Mephedrone
4-methylmethcathinone
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 15 mg | 15 mg | medium |
| Low | 25–75 mg | 25–75 mg | medium |
| Common | 75–150 mg | 75–150 mg | medium |
| Strong | 150–250 mg | 150–250 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 300+ mg | 300+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Oral dose ranges anchored by controlled human trial doses: 50-200 mg used in Olesti 2019 (linear PK confirmed across this range), 150 mg in Olesti 2017, and 200 mg in Papaseit 2016 (produced MDMA-comparable effects). Threshold and heavy values from community consensus (existing database). Common range encompasses the clinical trial doses where subjective effects were well-characterized. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral dose ranges anchored by controlled human trial doses: 50-200 mg used in Olesti 2019 (linear PK confirmed across this range), 150 mg in Olesti 2017, and 200 mg in Papaseit 2016 (produced MDMA-comparable effects). Threshold and heavy values from community consensus (existing database). Common range encompasses the clinical trial doses where subjective effects were well-characterized. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
insufflatedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 10–25 mg | 10–25 mg | low |
| Common | 25–75 mg | 25–75 mg | low |
| Strong | 75–125 mg | 75–125 mg | low |
| Heavy | 150+ mg | 150+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated doses from existing database (community-derived). The only controlled insufflated study used 100 mg (Czerwinska 2021), which falls in the high range. Papaseit 2021 found intranasal 70 mg produced effects comparable to oral 150 mg, consistent with higher bioavailability via this route. Lower tier values are community consensus without published validation. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated doses from existing database (community-derived). The only controlled insufflated study used 100 mg (Czerwinska 2021), which falls in the high range. Papaseit 2021 found intranasal 70 mg produced effects comparable to oral 150 mg, consistent with higher bioavailability via this route. Lower tier values are community consensus without published validation. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Come uptrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | From first alerts to approaching peak; derived from Tmax data and community reports. The rapid come-up is consistent with high BBB permeability (Simmler 2012). | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom first alerts to approaching peak; derived from Tmax data and community reports. The rapid come-up is consistent with high BBB permeability (Simmler 2012). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Peak duration estimated from PK curve shape: Tmax ~1h with t1/2 ~2.2h suggests peak window of approximately 45-90 minutes. Papaseit 2016 noted effects peaked earlier and resolved faster than MDMA. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPeak duration estimated from PK curve shape: Tmax ~1h with t1/2 ~2.2h suggests peak window of approximately 45-90 minutes. Papaseit 2016 noted effects peaked earlier and resolved faster than MDMA. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Offsettrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Declining effects consistent with t1/2 2.2 hours (Olesti 2017). Two half-lives (~4.4h) bring plasma levels to ~25% of peak, consistent with community-reported offset duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDeclining effects consistent with t1/2 2.2 hours (Olesti 2017). Two half-lives (~4.4h) bring plasma levels to ~25% of peak, consistent with community-reported offset duration. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Totaltrace | 3–5 hours | 3–5 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Total subjective duration consistent with PK parameters (t1/2 2.2h) and community consensus. Papaseit 2016 noted shorter total duration than MDMA. Does not include aftereffects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal subjective duration consistent with PK parameters (t1/2 2.2h) and community consensus. Papaseit 2016 noted shorter total duration than MDMA. Does not include aftereffects. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–6 hours | 2–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | Residual fatigue, low mood, and mild cognitive impairment reported in community surveys. No controlled measurement of aftereffect duration exists. Community consensus places aftereffects at 2-6 hours. | ||
ReasoningReasoningResidual fatigue, low mood, and mild cognitive impairment reported in community surveys. No controlled measurement of aftereffect duration exists. Community consensus places aftereffects at 2-6 hours. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 15–45 minutes | 15–45 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Inferred from Tmax ~1.0 h (Olesti 2017) and ~1.25 h (Papaseit 2016); first effects precede Tmax. Community consensus places oral onset at 15-45 minutes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from Tmax ~1.0 h (Olesti 2017) and ~1.25 h (Papaseit 2016); first effects precede Tmax. Community consensus places oral onset at 15-45 minutes. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 5–15 minutes | 5–15 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Faster onset than oral; Tmax 52.5 min (Czerwinska 2021) implies first effects well before peak. Community consensus places insufflated onset at 5-15 minutes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFaster onset than oral; Tmax 52.5 min (Czerwinska 2021) implies first effects well before peak. Community consensus places insufflated onset at 5-15 minutes. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Come uptrace | 10–20 minutes | 10–20 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Rapid escalation to peak consistent with Tmax ~52 min and higher bioavailability per mg (Papaseit 2021). | ||
ReasoningReasoningRapid escalation to peak consistent with Tmax ~52 min and higher bioavailability per mg (Papaseit 2021). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Shorter peak than oral route, consistent with faster Tmax and similar t1/2. Czerwinska 2021 PK data supports a compressed peak window. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShorter peak than oral route, consistent with faster Tmax and similar t1/2. Czerwinska 2021 PK data supports a compressed peak window. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Offsettrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Offset consistent with t1/2 ~2h (Czerwinska 2021). Shorter than oral offset due to compressed overall timeline. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOffset consistent with t1/2 ~2h (Czerwinska 2021). Shorter than oral offset due to compressed overall timeline. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Totaltrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Total insufflated duration shorter than oral, consistent with PK data (Czerwinska 2021, t1/2 1.98h) and community consensus placing insufflated total at 2-4 hours. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal insufflated duration shorter than oral, consistent with PK data (Czerwinska 2021, t1/2 1.98h) and community consensus placing insufflated total at 2-4 hours. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–5 hours | 2–5 hours | low |
| Editorial | Similar to oral aftereffects. Community consensus; no controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSimilar to oral aftereffects. Community consensus; no controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, neurological, thermoregulatory | cardiovascular, neurological, thermoregulatory | medium |
| Editorial | Acute toxicity classified as moderate: documented serotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone (Garrett 2010), sympathomimetic toxidrome in case series (Wood 2010, Imam 2013), and cardiovascular stress in controlled trials (Papaseit 2016). Not classified as high because no direct ion channel toxicity exists and fatalities overwhelmingly involve polydrug use. Chronic toxicity moderate: persistent serotonergic deficits in rodent binge models (Hadlock 2011), but no human neuroimaging data — evidence discount applied for animal-only data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute toxicity classified as moderate: documented serotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone (Garrett 2010), sympathomimetic toxidrome in case series (Wood 2010, Imam 2013), and cardiovascular stress in controlled trials (Papaseit 2016). Not classified as high because no direct ion channel toxicity exists and fatalities overwhelmingly involve polydrug use. Chronic toxicity moderate: persistent serotonergic deficits in rodent binge models (Hadlock 2011), but no human neuroimaging data — evidence discount applied for animal-only data. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | low | low | medium |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | high | high | medium |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Editorial | Compulsive redosing well-documented in human survey data (Winstock 2011) and mechanistically explained by rapid DA kinetics (Kehr 2011). Self-administration confirmed in rats (Aarde 2013, Hadlock 2011). Self-reported dependence symptoms reported in Global Drug Survey cohort (Uosukainen 2015). No controlled human dependence or withdrawal studies published — physical dependence rated low based on absence of evidence rather than evidence of absence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCompulsive redosing well-documented in human survey data (Winstock 2011) and mechanistically explained by rapid DA kinetics (Kehr 2011). Self-administration confirmed in rats (Aarde 2013, Hadlock 2011). Self-reported dependence symptoms reported in Global Drug Survey cohort (Uosukainen 2015). No controlled human dependence or withdrawal studies published — physical dependence rated low based on absence of evidence rather than evidence of absence. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | low |
| Symptoms | fatigue, low mood, anhedonia, irritability | fatigue, low mood, anhedonia, irritability | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | No formal withdrawal syndrome has been characterized. Post-use symptoms (fatigue, low mood) are reported in community surveys but no controlled withdrawal studies exist. Classified as not established rather than absent. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo formal withdrawal syndrome has been characterized. Post-use symptoms (fatigue, low mood) are reported in community surveys but no controlled withdrawal studies exist. Classified as not established rather than absent. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 10 days | 10 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | MDMA, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylone, cocaine | MDMA, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylone, cocaine | low |
| Editorial | Tolerance half-life (5 days) and full reset (1.5 weeks) are existing database values from community consensus, not confirmed by published primary research. Cross-tolerances inferred from shared monoamine transporter mechanism. No controlled tolerance studies have been published for mephedrone in humans. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance half-life (5 days) and full reset (1.5 weeks) are existing database values from community consensus, not confirmed by published primary research. Cross-tolerances inferred from shared monoamine transporter mechanism. No controlled tolerance studies have been published for mephedrone in humans. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| metabolic CYP2D6 poor/intermediate metabolizer statustrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Directly demonstrated in Phase I dose-response study: CYP2D6 genotype correlated with plasma mephedrone concentrations and toxicity risk (Olesti et al. 2019, Clin Pharmacol Ther). | ||
ReasoningReasoningDirectly demonstrated in Phase I dose-response study: CYP2D6 genotype correlated with plasma mephedrone concentrations and toxicity risk (Olesti et al. 2019, Clin Pharmacol Ther). | |||
| cardiovascular pre-existing cardiovascular diseasetrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Cardiovascular effects documented in controlled human trials (Papaseit 2016) and animal telemetry (Meng 2012, Chojnacki 2023). No threshold below which cardiovascular effects are absent. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCardiovascular effects documented in controlled human trials (Papaseit 2016) and animal telemetry (Meng 2012, Chojnacki 2023). No threshold below which cardiovascular effects are absent. | |||
| psychiatric concurrent serotonergic medicationtrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Serotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone documented in case report (Garrett 2010, BMJ Case Reports). Mechanistic basis: mephedrone is a full releaser at human SERT (Mayer 2023). | ||
ReasoningReasoningSerotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone documented in case report (Garrett 2010, BMJ Case Reports). Mechanistic basis: mephedrone is a full releaser at human SERT (Mayer 2023). | |||
| other hot/warm environmentstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Demonstrated by Miller et al. (2013): ambient temperature is a critical modifier of mephedrone's thermoregulatory effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDemonstrated by Miller et al. (2013): ambient temperature is a critical modifier of mephedrone's thermoregulatory effects. | |||
| other alcohol co-usetrace | relative | relative | high |
| Editorial | Directly demonstrated in controlled human RCT (Papaseit et al. 2019). | ||
ReasoningReasoningDirectly demonstrated in controlled human RCT (Papaseit et al. 2019). | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | No published data on reproductive safety. Absolute contraindication based on precautionary principle given potent sympathomimetic effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published data on reproductive safety. Absolute contraindication based on precautionary principle given potent sympathomimetic effects. | |||
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Psychiatric symptoms documented at high doses (Angoa-Perez 2017). Cathinone intoxication mimics primary psychosis (Luethi & Liechti 2020). | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychiatric symptoms documented at high doses (Angoa-Perez 2017). Cathinone intoxication mimics primary psychosis (Luethi & Liechti 2020). | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Come uptrace | 900–1800 sec(i=0.35) | 900–1800 sec(i=0.35) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
| Peaktrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 2700–5400 sec(i=1.00) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
| Plateautrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.20) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.20) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–18000 sec(i=0.05) | 7200–18000 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
| Onsettrace | 900–2700 sec(i=0.05) | 900–2700 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Oral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline is anchored by controlled human PK data: Tmax 1.0-1.25 h (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017), t1/2 2.15-2.2 h (both studies). The short half-life predicts rapid offset. Onset 15-45 min is inferred from Tmax ~1h and community consensus. Total duration 3-6 hours is consistent with PK parameters and observational data. Phase durations are estimated from PK curve shape and community reports. | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 300–900 sec(i=0.05) | 300–900 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
| Come uptrace | 600–1200 sec(i=0.40) | 600–1200 sec(i=0.40) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
| Peaktrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.20) | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.20) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.05) | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
| Plateautrace | 900–2700 sec(i=0.45) | 900–2700 sec(i=0.45) | medium |
| Editorial | Intranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIntranasal timeline anchored by Czerwinska et al. (2021): Tmax 52.5 min plasma, t1/2 1.98 h. Faster onset and shorter total duration versus oral route. Papaseit et al. (2021) confirms both routes produce similar subjective profiles but intranasal achieves higher concentrations per mg dose. Community consensus places insufflated duration at 2-4 hours total. Phase durations estimated from PK parameters and community data. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At light doses, stimulation becomes clearly perceptible: increased energy, mild euphoria, enhanced sociability, and slight empathogenic warmth. Thought acceleration is noticeable but manageable. Music may sound slightly enhanced. Physically, heart rate and blood pressure increase modestly. Pupillary dilation becomes apparent. Mild jaw tension (bruxism) and slight appetite suppression are common. Vasoconstriction may produce cool extremities. The experience at this range is functional — conversation and social activity are enhanced rather than impaired. Sleep will be delayed for 2–3 hours after effects subside.
The 50 mg lower bound of Olesti et al. (2019) Phase I dose-response study falls in this range, confirming measurable subjective and cardiovascular effects. Community consensus places light oral doses at approximately 25–75 mg.
ReasoningReasoning
The 50 mg lower bound of Olesti et al. (2019) Phase I dose-response study falls in this range, confirming measurable subjective and cardiovascular effects. Community consensus places light oral doses at approximately 25–75 mg.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At common doses, the full mephedrone experience is present: pronounced euphoria, strong stimulation, empathy enhancement and emotional warmth, marked sociability, and music enhancement. Thought acceleration is significant. Sexual arousal enhancement is frequently reported. Compulsive redosing urges typically emerge at this range. Cardiovascular effects are substantial — elevated heart rate, increased blood pressure, pupillary dilation, and diaphoresis. Bruxism and jaw clenching become pronounced. Appetite is fully suppressed. Body temperature regulation may be affected, particularly in warm environments. The experience lasts 3–5 hours orally. Sleep is impossible during effects and difficult for 1–2 hours after. The strong urge to redose is a defining feature of this dose range.
The 150 mg and 200 mg doses used in controlled human trials (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017) fall within or just above this range. Subjective effects at 200 mg were comparable to MDMA 100 mg. Community data places common oral doses at approximately 75–150 mg.
ReasoningReasoning
The 150 mg and 200 mg doses used in controlled human trials (Papaseit 2016, Olesti 2017) fall within or just above this range. Subjective effects at 200 mg were comparable to MDMA 100 mg. Community data places common oral doses at approximately 75–150 mg.
Evidence basis: controlled_human_study
At strong doses, effects intensify considerably: euphoria becomes overwhelming, stimulation is pronounced, and entactogenic effects reach their maximum — intense empathy, emotional openness, and tactile enhancement. Thought acceleration may become disorganized. Minor perceptual distortions are possible. Cardiovascular stress is significant: tachycardia, hypertension, profuse sweating, and marked pupillary dilation. Bruxism may become painful. Vasoconstriction produces noticeably cold extremities. Risk of serotonin syndrome increases. Compulsive redosing urges are intense and difficult to resist. The experience is immersive and functionally impairing. Sleep is impossible for several hours after effects subside. Significant comedown effects including low mood and fatigue are typical.
The 200 mg dose in Papaseit et al. (2016) sits at the lower end of this range and produced significant cardiovascular and subjective effects comparable to MDMA. Community data places strong oral doses at approximately 150–250 mg. No systematic study has characterized effects above 200 mg.
ReasoningReasoning
The 200 mg dose in Papaseit et al. (2016) sits at the lower end of this range and produced significant cardiovascular and subjective effects comparable to MDMA. Community data places strong oral doses at approximately 150–250 mg. No systematic study has characterized effects above 200 mg.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At heavy doses, the experience becomes dominated by intense stimulation, potentially overwhelming euphoria, and significant cardiovascular strain. Psychiatric symptoms — paranoia, anxiety, agitation — become likely. Perceptual distortions may occur. The entactogenic warmth characteristic of lower doses may give way to agitation and dysphoria. Cardiovascular risk is serious: pronounced tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia (particularly in warm environments), and chest pain. Risk of serotonin syndrome is elevated. Compulsive redosing at this level may lead to cumulative toxicity over a session. This dose range carries substantial medical risk. Emergency presentations with sympathomimetic toxidrome and serotonin syndrome features have been documented at doses in and above this range.
No controlled data exist above 200 mg oral. Community data places heavy oral doses above 250–300 mg. Toxidrome case reports document serious adverse effects at high doses but exact dose-response relationships are not characterized. The linear PK up to 200 mg (Olesti 2019) may not hold at higher doses.
ReasoningReasoning
No controlled data exist above 200 mg oral. Community data places heavy oral doses above 250–300 mg. Toxidrome case reports document serious adverse effects at high doses but exact dose-response relationships are not characterized. The linear PK up to 200 mg (Olesti 2019) may not hold at higher doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At threshold doses, effects are barely perceptible: a subtle lift in mood, faint stimulation, and mild sociability that could easily be attributed to placebo. Slight pupillary dilation may be noticeable to an observer. Physical effects are minimal — perhaps a slight increase in heart rate and mild jaw tension. Most users at this range report uncertainty about whether they are feeling the substance at all. Functional impairment is negligible. Sleep may be mildly delayed but is not prevented.
No published dose-finding studies exist for threshold doses. Existing community-sourced data places oral threshold at approximately 15 mg; this is consistent with the linear PK established by Olesti et al. (2019) but has not been formally validated.
ReasoningReasoning
No published dose-finding studies exist for threshold doses. Existing community-sourced data places oral threshold at approximately 15 mg; this is consistent with the linear PK established by Olesti et al. (2019) but has not been formally validated.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateThe designer methcathinone analogs, mephedrone and methylone, are substrates for monoamine transporters in brain tissueBaumann MH, Ayestas MA, Partilla JS, et al. · 2012 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [2]moderatePharmacological characterization of designer cathinones in vitroSimmler LD, Buser TA, Donzelli M, et al. · 2012 · British Journal of Pharmacologydoi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02145.x9 claims checked9 inconclusive
- [3]moderateMephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone; 'meow meow'): chemical, pharmacological and clinical issuesSchifano F, Albanese A, Fergus S, et al. · 2011 · Psychopharmacology
- [4]weak
- [5]moderateChemsex-related deaths in the United Kingdom (2017-2022): A review of the Forensic Toxicology dataTyler M, Ward L, Grosse S · 2025 · Forensic Science International
- [6]moderateMephedrone: use, subjective effects and health risksWinstock A, Mitcheson L, Ramsey J, et al. · 2011 · Addiction
- [7]moderateMephedrone, a new designer drug of abuse, produces acute hemodynamic effects in the ratMeng H, Cao J, Kang J, et al. · 2012 · Toxicology Letters
- [8]weakThe serotonin syndrome as a result of mephedrone toxicityGarrett G, Sweeney M · 2010 · BMJ Case Reports
- [9]moderateGC-MS Quantification Method for Mephedrone in Plasma and Urine: Application to Human PharmacokineticsOlesti E, Pujadas M, Papaseit E, et al. · 2017 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [10]moderate4-Methylmethcathinone (mephedrone): neuropharmacological effects of a designer stimulant of abuseHadlock GC, Webb KM, McFadden LM, et al. · 2011 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [11]strongHuman Pharmacology of Mephedrone in Comparison with MDMAPapaseit E, Pérez-Mañá C, Mateus JA, et al. · 2016 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [12]strongMephedrone and Alcohol Interactions in HumansPapaseit E, Perez-Mana C, de Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, et al. · 2019 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [13]moderateMephedrone induces partial release at human dopamine transporters but full release at human serotonin transportersMayer FP, Niello M, Bulling S, et al. · 2023 · Neuropharmacology
- [14]strongDose-Response Pharmacological Study of Mephedrone and Its Metabolites: Pharmacokinetics, Serotoninergic Effects, and Impact of CYP2D6 Genetic VariationOlesti E, Farre M, Carbo ML, et al. · 2019 · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- [15]moderateMephedrone, compared with MDMA (ecstasy) and amphetamine, rapidly increases both dopamine and 5-HT levels in nucleus accumbens of awake ratsKehr J, Ichinose F, Yoshitake S, et al. · 2011 · British Journal of Pharmacology
- [16]moderateA 3-year review of new psychoactive substances in caseworkElliott S, Evans J · 2014 · Forensic Science International
- [17]weakSMILES and physical properties of mephedrone (CID 45266826)PubChem/Chemsrc · 2024linkno claims checked
- [18]moderateStereoselective Differences between the Reinforcing and Motivational Effects of Cathinone-Derived 4-Methylmethcathinone (Mephedrone) in Self-Administering RatsPhilogene-Khalid HL, Simmons SJ, Nayak S, et al. · 2017 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [19]moderateIn vitro metabolism studies on mephedrone and analysis of forensic casesPedersen AJ, Reitzel LA, Johansen SS, Linnet K · 2013 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [20]moderateNeuropharmacology of Synthetic CathinonesBaumann MH, Walters HM, Niello M, Sitte HH · 2018 · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
- [21]moderatePolytox synthetic cathinone abuse: role for organic cation transporter 3Mayer FP, Schmid D, Holy M, Daws LC, Sitte HH · 2019 · Neurochemistry International
- [22]moderatePharmacokinetics of Mephedrone and Its Metabolites in Whole Blood and Plasma after Controlled Intranasal Administration to Healthy Human VolunteersCzerwinska J, Parkin MC, George C, et al. · 2021 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [23]moderateAcute Pharmacological Effects of Oral and Intranasal Mephedrone: An Observational Study in HumansPapaseit E, Olesti E, Perez-Mana C, et al. · 2021 · Pharmaceuticals
- [24]moderatePharmacokinetics of Mephedrone and Its Metabolites in Human by LC-MS/MSOlesti E, Farre M, Papaseit E, et al. · 2017 · The AAPS Journal
- [25]moderateAbuse-related and abuse-limiting effects of methcathinone and the synthetic bath salts cathinone analogs MDPV, methylone and mephedrone on intracranial self-stimulation in ratsBonano JS, Glennon RA, De Felice LJ, Banks ML, Negus SS · 2014 · Psychopharmacology
- [26]moderateComparative neuropharmacology of three psychostimulant cathinone derivatives: butylone, mephedrone and methyloneLopez-Arnau R, Martinez-Clemente J, Pubill D, Escubedo E, Camarasa J · 2012 · British Journal of Pharmacology
- [27]moderateLong-term cognitive and neurochemical effects of bath salt designer drugs methylone and mephedroneden Hollander B, Rozov S, Linden AM, et al. · 2013 · Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
- [28]moderateManganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals differential long-term neuroadaptation after methamphetamine and mephedroneden Hollander B, Dudek M, Ojanpera I, et al. · 2014 · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
- [29]moderateDifferential effects of cathinone compounds and MDMA on body temperature in the rat, and pharmacological characterization of mephedrone-induced hypothermiaShortall SE, Green AR, Swift KM, Fone KC, King MV · 2013 · British Journal of Pharmacology
- [30]moderateEffect of ambient temperature on the thermoregulatory and locomotor stimulant effects of 4-methylmethcathinone in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley ratsWright MJ, Angrish D, Aarde SM, et al. · 2012 · PLoS ONE
- [31]moderateChanges in ambient temperature differentially alter the thermoregulatory, cardiac and locomotor stimulant effects of 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone)Miller ML, Creehan KM, Angrish D, et al. · 2013 · Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- [32]moderateMephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) supports intravenous self-administration in Sprague-Dawley and Wistar ratsAarde SM, Angrish D, Barlow DJ, et al. · 2013 · Addiction Biology
- [33]weakRecreational use of mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone, 4-MMC) with associated sympathomimetic toxicityWood DM, Davies S, Puchnarewicz M, et al. · 2010 · Journal of Medical Toxicology
- [34]weakBath salts intoxication: a case seriesImam SF, Patel H, Mahmoud M, et al. · 2013 · Journal of Emergency Medicine
- [35]moderateNeurochemical and Cardiovascular Effects of 4-Chloro Ring-Substituted Synthetic Cathinones in RatsChojnacki MR, Thorndike EB, Partilla JS, et al. · 2023 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [36]weakMultiple-drug toxicity caused by the coadministration of 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone) and heroinDickson AJ, Vorce SP, Levine B, Past MR · 2010 · Journal of Analytical Toxicologypubmed 204065412 claims checked2 inconclusive
- [37]moderateMephedrone related fatalities: a reviewBusardo FP, Kyriakou C, Napoletano S, Marinelli E, Zaami S · 2015 · European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciencespubmed 265028701 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [38]moderateNeurotoxicology of Synthetic Cathinone AnalogsAngoa-Perez M, Anneken JH, Kuhn DM · 2017 · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- [39]strongDesigner drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effectsLuethi D, Liechti ME · 2020 · Archives of Toxicology
- [40]moderateSelf-reported prevalence of dependence of MDMA compared to cocaine, mephedrone and ketamine among a sample of recreational poly-drug usersUosukainen H, Tacke U, Winstock AR · 2015 · International Journal on Drug Policy
- [41]moderateSynthetic psychoactive cathinones: hypothermia and reduced lethality compared to methamphetamine and MDMAMuskiewicz DE, Resendiz-Gutierrez F, Issa O, Hall FS · 2020 · Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary14 claims14inconclusive
inconclusive2-(Methylamino)-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one (mephedrone, 4-MMC) is a substituted cathinone with combined stimulant and entactogen properties, acting as a non-selective monoamine releasing agent at dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusive2-(Methylamino)-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one (mephedrone, 4-MMC) is a substituted cathinone with combined stimulant and entactogen properties, acting as a non-selective monoamine releasing agent at dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveOral effects last 3–6 hours with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 2.2 hours — substantially shorter than MDMA (t½ ≈ 7.9 hours), a pharmacokinetic profile associated with compulsive redosing.[9]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveOral effects last 3–6 hours with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 2.2 hours — substantially shorter than MDMA (t½ ≈ 7.9 hours), a pharmacokinetic profile associated with compulsive redosing.[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIt became one of the most widely used recreational drugs in the United Kingdom by 2009–2010 before classification as a UK Class B substance (April 2010) and US Schedule I compound (July 2012)[3]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveTwo completed Phase I RCTs from Barcelona provide the only controlled human pharmacological data, making mephedrone among the better-characterized novel psychoactive substances.[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveTwo completed Phase I RCTs from Barcelona provide the only controlled human pharmacological data, making mephedrone among the better-characterized novel psychoactive substances.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone acts as a full substrate-type releaser at human SERT but only a partial releaser at human DAT, with high blood-brain barrier permeability and no trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism — distinguishing it pharmacologically from classical amphetamines[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone acts as a full substrate-type releaser at human SERT but only a partial releaser at human DAT, with high blood-brain barrier permeability and no trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism — distinguishing it pharmacologically from classical amphetamines[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCYP2D6 is the primary metabolic enzyme; poor metabolizers accumulate higher plasma concentrations and face elevated toxicity risk.[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn awake rats, mephedrone raises nucleus accumbens dopamine to 496% and serotonin to 941% of baseline — a combined profile underlying its distinctive subjective character[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCardiovascular toxicity is the primary acute risk: dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output occur at recreational doses[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCompulsive redosing is well-documented empirically and driven mechanistically by rapid dopamine release with short elimination[6]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusivePreclinical binge models produce persistent serotonergic deficits paralleling MDMA's neurotoxicity profile[10]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
history5 claims5inconclusive
inconclusiveForensic surveillance identifies it as the most frequently detected novel psychoactive substance in UK casework over the 2010–2012 period, and it has emerged as a key substance in chemsex-associated fatalities in the UK between 2017 and 2022[16]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveForensic surveillance identifies it as the most frequently detected novel psychoactive substance in UK casework over the 2010–2012 period, and it has emerged as a key substance in chemsex-associated fatalities in the UK between 2017 and 2022[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIt became one of the most popular recreational drugs in the UK during this period, particularly prevalent at festivals and nightclubs.[3]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveTwo completed Phase I clinical trials from Barcelona — the only controlled human studies of mephedrone — have provided the pharmacological foundation for current scientific understanding.[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveTwo completed Phase I clinical trials from Barcelona — the only controlled human studies of mephedrone — have provided the pharmacological foundation for current scientific understanding.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
chemistry2 claims2inconclusive
inconclusiveIts structural relationship to MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine) — both being ring-substituted, N-methylated phenethylamine derivatives — underlies their shared entactogenic pharmacology, though mephedrone carries a β-keto group rather than a methylenedioxy ring.[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe R-enantiomer is primarily responsible for the rewarding and reinforcing properties: in rat self-administration studies, R-mephedrone produced higher progressive ratio breakpoints and elicited greater positive affect (50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations) than S-mephedrone[18]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
pharmacology20 claims20inconclusive
inconclusiveMetabolism: The primary metabolic enzyme is CYP2D6, confirmed both in vitro and in vivo[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone is a non-selective substrate-type releaser at all three plasma membrane monoamine transporters — the dopamine transporter (DAT), norepinephrine transporter (NET), and serotonin transporter (SERT) — causing carrier-mediated reverse transport (efflux) of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) into the synaptic cleft[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone is a non-selective substrate-type releaser at all three plasma membrane monoamine transporters — the dopamine transporter (DAT), norepinephrine transporter (NET), and serotonin transporter (SERT) — causing carrier-mediated reverse transport (efflux) of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) into the synaptic cleft[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThis mechanism is shared with MDMA and distinguishes substrate-type releasers from non-transported blockers such as MDPV.[20]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveA critical mechanistic refinement emerged from work characterizing mephedrone at cloned human transporters: mephedrone acts as a full substrate at human SERT but only a partial substrate at human DAT[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone is not a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist, unlike amphetamine and methamphetamine — eliminating this regulatory feedback pathway from its pharmacological profile[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIt exhibits high blood-brain barrier permeability in vitro, ranking among the highest of all tested synthetic cathinones[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhen DAT is pharmacologically blocked, mephedrone can induce monoamine release via organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3), a mechanism potentially explaining the paradoxically potent effects observed during co-administration with DAT blockers such as MDPV[21]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone does not directly affect major cardiac voltage-dependent ion channels at concentrations up to 30 μM, indicating cardiovascular effects are transporter-mediated rather than pro-arrhythmic[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveOral route: In healthy male volunteers receiving 150 mg oral mephedrone, peak plasma concentration (Cmax) reached 122.6 ± 32.9 ng/mL at a Tmax of 1.0 hour (range 0.5–2 h), with an elimination half-life (t½) of 2.2 hours[9]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveA separate RCT using 200 mg oral mephedrone reported Tmax = 1.25 hours and t½ = 2.15 hours, compared to MDMA 100 mg with Tmax = 2.00 hours and t½ = 7.89 hours[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveDose-response pharmacokinetics are linear across the 50–200 mg oral range, with plasma concentrations, cardiovascular effects, and blood serotonin concentrations all scaling proportionally with dose.[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIntranasal route: Following 100 mg insufflated mephedrone in healthy males, mean Tmax was 52.5 ± 20.7 minutes in plasma with a t½ of 1.98 ± 0.30 hours[22]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe intranasal route produces higher mephedrone concentrations in oral fluid and urine per milligram of dose compared to oral administration, suggesting greater bioavailability.[23]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMetabolism: The primary metabolic enzyme is CYP2D6, confirmed both in vitro and in vivo[19]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveSix metabolites have been characterized: 4'-carboxy-mephedrone (most abundant — approximately 10× parent compound in urine), nor-mephedrone, dihydro-mephedrone (~10% of parent in plasma), N-succinyl-nor-mephedrone (longest detection window, t½ = 8.2 hours), hydroxytolyl-mephedrone, and 4-carboxy-dihydro-mephedrone[24]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveSix metabolites have been characterized: 4'-carboxy-mephedrone (most abundant — approximately 10× parent compound in urine), nor-mephedrone, dihydro-mephedrone (~10% of parent in plasma), N-succinyl-nor-mephedrone (longest detection window, t½ = 8.2 hours), hydroxytolyl-mephedrone, and 4-carboxy-dihydro-mephedrone[22]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveSix metabolites have been characterized: 4'-carboxy-mephedrone (most abundant — approximately 10× parent compound in urine), nor-mephedrone, dihydro-mephedrone (~10% of parent in plasma), N-succinyl-nor-mephedrone (longest detection window, t½ = 8.2 hours), hydroxytolyl-mephedrone, and 4-carboxy-dihydro-mephedrone[19]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveBoth mephedrone and nor-mephedrone cross the blood-brain barrier in vivo.[24]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusive{{Warning}}CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics: Individuals with poor or intermediate CYP2D6 metabolizer status accumulate higher plasma mephedrone concentrations and face elevated risk of acute toxicity.{{/Warning}}[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
neuroscience16 claims16inconclusive
inconclusiveIn vivo microdialysis in awake rats demonstrates that a single 3 mg/kg subcutaneous dose raises extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens to 496% of baseline, with a rapid elimination half-life of approximately 25 minutes[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIntravenous doses of 0.3–1.0 mg/kg produce dose-dependent increases in extracellular dopamine and serotonin in the nucleus accumbens, with the serotonergic component proportionally greater at each dose.[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe serotonergic component of mephedrone's action is substantial: 5-HT release in the nucleus accumbens reaches 941% of baseline at 3 mg/kg, comparable to MDMA's 911% at the same dose[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveBinge-pattern exposure (4 × 10 or 25 mg/kg s.c. at 2-hour intervals) in rats produces rapid decreases in striatal DAT and hippocampal SERT function[10]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveRepeated subcutaneous dosing (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg × 3) in rats did not produce long-term depletion of cortical or striatal monoamines, unlike MDMA[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhat accounts for the thermoregulatory discrepancy between rodent and human data? Rat models consistently show hypothermia at standard lab temperatures, while human overdose cases present with hyperthermia. Ambient temperature is a critical modifier, but the full thermoregulatory mechanism in humans remains uncharacterized.[29]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhat accounts for the thermoregulatory discrepancy between rodent and human data? Rat models consistently show hypothermia at standard lab temperatures, while human overdose cases present with hyperthermia. Ambient temperature is a critical modifier, but the full thermoregulatory mechanism in humans remains uncharacterized.[30]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhat accounts for the thermoregulatory discrepancy between rodent and human data? Rat models consistently show hypothermia at standard lab temperatures, while human overdose cases present with hyperthermia. Ambient temperature is a critical modifier, but the full thermoregulatory mechanism in humans remains uncharacterized.[31]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIntracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) studies confirm that mephedrone dose-dependently facilitates brain stimulation reward in rats, directly demonstrating potentiation of reward circuitry.[25]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone-induced locomotor activation is dependent on endogenous serotonin availability, and vesicular monoamine stores play a key role in the serotonin release mechanism[26]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveRepeated mephedrone exposure in mice produces long-term behavioral and neurochemical changes including alterations in anxiety-related behavior and monoamine system markers[27]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveManganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI) imaging reveals differential long-term neuroadaptation patterns between mephedrone and methamphetamine, indicating substance-specific rather than class-generic neural remodeling.[28]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe stereoselective reinforcement data — R-mephedrone driving higher progressive ratio breakpoints and greater positive affect than S-mephedrone — maps onto the incentive salience framework[18]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe rapid onset and offset of dopamine transients is precisely the temporal pattern predicted to maximize incentive salience attribution.[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveHowever, MEMRI imaging reveals persistent neuroadaptation, suggesting that repeated exposure produces circuit-level changes not captured by simple monoamine tissue assays.[28]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveDoes OCT3-mediated release occur at clinically relevant concentrations in humans? The alternative release pathway via OCT3 has been demonstrated in vitro but not confirmed in vivo in humans.[21]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
receptor pharmacology8 claims8inconclusive
inconclusiveIn HEK293 cells transfected with human monoamine transporters, mephedrone inhibits uptake of dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin with roughly equal potency at all three transporters, classifying it as a non-selective uptake inhibitor[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThis dual profile — uptake inhibition plus SERT-mediated release — places mephedrone in the 'MDMA-like' cluster of synthetic cathinones.[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn rat brain synaptosomes, mephedrone and methylone showed profiles comparable to MDMA as nonselective substrates for monoamine transporters, functioning as weaker motor stimulants than methamphetamine.[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe most mechanistically precise characterization demonstrates differential release efficacy at human transporters: mephedrone achieves full release efficacy at hSERT (comparable to para-chloroamphetamine) but only partial release efficacy at hDAT (less than S(+)-amphetamine)[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone-induced hyperlocomotion in rats is dependent on endogenous serotonin, and vesicular monoamine content plays a key role in its serotonin uptake inhibition[26]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveUnlike classical amphetamines, mephedrone shows no agonist activity at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1)[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhen DAT is pharmacologically occupied (e.g., by co-administered MDPV), mephedrone retains the ability to induce monoamine release through organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3)[21]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveExact IC₅₀ and Ki values (nM) at human DAT, NET, and SERT are reported in the full texts of key characterization studies but were not extractable from abstracts in this research cycle[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail6 claims6inconclusive
inconclusiveAcross the 50–200 mg oral dose range, mephedrone displays linear pharmacokinetics: plasma concentrations, cardiovascular effects, subjective effects, and blood serotonin concentrations all increase proportionally with dose[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIndividuals with poor or intermediate CYP2D6 metabolizer status accumulate higher plasma mephedrone concentrations at equivalent doses and face elevated risk of acute toxicity[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe intranasal route produces higher mephedrone concentrations in oral fluid and urine per milligram of dose compared to oral administration, consistent with greater bioavailability via the nasal mucosa[23]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCYP2D6 is the primary Phase I metabolic enzyme, confirmed in human liver microsomes in vitro and by CYP2D6 phenotype-dependent plasma concentration variability in vivo.[19]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCYP2D6 is the primary Phase I metabolic enzyme, confirmed in human liver microsomes in vitro and by CYP2D6 phenotype-dependent plasma concentration variability in vivo.[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn rats, mephedrone has a shorter plasma half-life (~1 hour) than in humans (~2.2 hours), with liver microsomal t½ of approximately 90 minutes[32]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
effects overview2 claims2inconclusive
inconclusiveIn the only controlled head-to-head comparison, oral mephedrone 200 mg produced subjective effects comparable in quality to MDMA 100 mg — similar ratings on euphoria, well-being, and stimulation scales — but with earlier peak and substantially shorter total duration[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveRoute of administration shapes the experience significantly: oral dosing produces a more gradual, sustained arc with greater entactogenic warmth, while insufflation delivers a faster, sharper onset that emphasizes the stimulant component and intensifies the compulsive urge to redose[23]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
safety42 claims4verified38inconclusive
verifiedSerotonin syndrome has been documented from mephedrone alone[8]model confidence 97%
Abstract describes a case where mephedrone was the principal substance and the patient was successfully treated for serotonin syndrome, directly documenting serotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone.
Principal substance mephedrone. Became hyperthermic, deteriorated over next hour. Appropriate treatment for serotonin syndrome led to sustained recovery over 15h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe acute toxicity presentation is a sympathomimetic toxidrome: tachycardia, hypertension, chest pain, diaphoresis, agitation, psychomotor excitation, pupillary dilation, and — in clinical overdose settings — hyperthermia[33]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe acute toxicity presentation is a sympathomimetic toxidrome: tachycardia, hypertension, chest pain, diaphoresis, agitation, psychomotor excitation, pupillary dilation, and — in clinical overdose settings — hyperthermia[34]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
verifiedA 22-year-old male presented with tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertonia, hyperreflexia, clonus, and hyperthermia following mephedrone ingestion; progressive deterioration occurred over the first hour, with sustained recovery over 15 hours under appropriate management[8]model confidence 99%
The abstract is nearly verbatim: it describes a 22-year-old male with tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertonia, hyper-reflexia and clonus, mephedrone as principal substance, hyperthermia, deterioration over the next hour, and recovery over 15h with appropriate treatment for serotonin syndrome.
22-year-old male presented with tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertonia, hyper-reflexia and clonus. Principal substance mephedrone. Became hyperthermic, deteriorated over next hour. Appropriate treatment for serotonin syndrome led to sustained recovery over 15h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone produces dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output/ejection fraction in rat telemetry studies[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone produces dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output/ejection fraction in rat telemetry studies[35]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn vitro patch clamp experiments show no direct pro-arrhythmic effect on cardiac ion channels at concentrations up to 30 μM, indicating cardiovascular effects are mediated by catecholamine release rather than direct ion channel blockade[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveAmbient temperature significantly modulates both cardiac and thermoregulatory effects — a finding with direct clinical relevance to use in hot environments such as nightclubs and raves.[31]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn rats at standard laboratory temperatures (23°C), mephedrone consistently produces hypothermia[29]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn rats at standard laboratory temperatures (23°C), mephedrone consistently produces hypothermia[30]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn rats at standard laboratory temperatures (23°C), mephedrone consistently produces hypothermia[32]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThis discrepancy is resolved by ambient temperature as a critical modifier: higher ambient temperatures shift the thermoregulatory response toward hyperthermia[31]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn preclinical models, synthetic cathinones including mephedrone show less lethality via temperature dysregulation than MDMA or methamphetamine.[41]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe first published mephedrone-associated fatality involved a 22-year-old male with blood mephedrone of 0.50 mg/L and concurrent heroin (morphine 0.06 mg/L); death was attributed to multiple-drug toxicity[36]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveA 3-year forensic casework review in the UK (2010–2012) found mephedrone was the most frequently detected NPS, with 84% of cases involving co-use of other substances or alcohol; in drug-related fatalities, only 7% solely involved NPS[16]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveSystematic review of mephedrone-specific fatalities revealed that many early media-attributed deaths involved other substances on analytical confirmation; only a small number had mephedrone confirmed as a causative agent[37]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveContemporary forensic data from UK chemsex-related deaths (2017–2022) identify mephedrone as a key substance in 21 fatalities in this context.[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveForensic blood concentrations in traffic cases range from 1–51 μg/kg.[19]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusivePsychiatric symptoms including paranoia, hallucinations, and anxiety are documented at high doses or after prolonged use[38]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCathinone intoxication can present with acute psychiatric symptoms indistinguishable from primary psychosis in emergency settings[39]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone reliably maintains self-administration in rats at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion, with dose-dependent reinforcing properties confirmed by dose-substitution and progressive ratio procedures[32]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone reliably maintains self-administration in rats at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion, with dose-dependent reinforcing properties confirmed by dose-substitution and progressive ratio procedures[10]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe R-enantiomer is primarily responsible for reinforcing properties, showing higher break points and greater positive affect than the S-enantiomer[18]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveBrain stimulation reward studies confirm dose-dependent facilitation of intracranial self-stimulation.[25]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIn human surveys, compulsive redosing and difficulty stopping during a session are widely reported, with a subset of regular users reporting dependence features[6]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveSelf-reported last-year dependence symptoms for mephedrone show notable dependence liability compared to MDMA, cocaine, and ketamine in poly-drug user samples.[40]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveBinge exposure in rats produces persistent serotonergic deficits (decreased hippocampal SERT function) without dopaminergic deficits[10]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveLong-term behavioral and neurochemical changes persist after repeated exposure in mice, including alterations in anxiety-related behavior.[27]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
verifiedMephedrone alone can precipitate serotonin syndrome; co-administration with SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, tramadol, lithium, or triptans elevates this risk substantially[8]model confidence 90%
The abstract directly supports that mephedrone alone (as principal substance) precipitated serotonin syndrome. The claim's second part about elevated risk with serotonergic co-administration is a reasonable mechanistic inference from this case. The paper's scope explicitly covers 'serotonergic interaction risk.'
Principal substance mephedrone. Became hyperthermic, deteriorated over next hour. Appropriate treatment for serotonin syndrome led to sustained recovery over 15h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCo-administration with MDMA raises synaptic serotonin through convergent mechanisms — both are potent SERT substrates and 5-HT releasers[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveCo-administration with MDMA raises synaptic serotonin through convergent mechanisms — both are potent SERT substrates and 5-HT releasers[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe only controlled human interaction study found that mephedrone 200 mg combined with ethanol 0.8 g/kg produced greater euphoria and well-being than either drug alone, while mephedrone attenuated alcohol's sedative effects — potentially masking intoxication and leading to higher alcohol consumption[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveA fatal combination of mephedrone (blood 0.50 mg/L) and heroin (morphine 0.06 mg/L) documents the risk of combining CNS stimulants with opioid respiratory depressants.[36]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveWhen DAT is pharmacologically blocked by MDPV, mephedrone retains the ability to release monoamines via OCT3, producing paradoxically potent and unpredictable stimulation[21]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveGiven reliable increases in heart rate and blood pressure, patients on antihypertensive therapy may experience unpredictable cardiovascular effects[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveGiven reliable increases in heart rate and blood pressure, patients on antihypertensive therapy may experience unpredictable cardiovascular effects[35]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveIndividuals with reduced CYP2D6 function accumulate higher plasma mephedrone concentrations, creating a pharmacogenomically determined risk for acute toxicity at doses tolerated by extensive metabolizers[14]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusivePre-existing cardiovascular disease is a contraindication based on mephedrone's reliable, dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output[7]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusivePre-existing cardiovascular disease is a contraindication based on mephedrone's reliable, dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output[35]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
verifiedMephedrone alone causes serotonin syndrome at recreational doses.[8]model confidence 90%
The abstract documents a case where mephedrone was the principal substance and the clinical presentation met serotonin syndrome criteria. The dose is not specified in the abstract as 'recreational,' but use of mephedrone in this context is consistent with recreational use. The paper's scope confirms 'serotonin syndrome from mephedrone alone.'
Principal substance mephedrone. Became hyperthermic, deteriorated over next hour. Appropriate treatment for serotonin syndrome led to sustained recovery over 15h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveAmbient temperature modulates mephedrone's thermoregulatory effects: warm environments shift the response from hypothermia toward hyperthermia, increasing the risk of heat-related injury in settings such as nightclubs and outdoor festivals.[31]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveAlcohol co-use amplifies cardiovascular effects and euphoria while masking alcohol-related sedation, increasing both acute medical risk and abuse liability.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
clinical evidence3 claims3inconclusive
inconclusiveThis double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover RCT enrolled 12 healthy male volunteers and compared single oral doses of mephedrone 200 mg, MDMA 100 mg, and placebo.[11]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThis double-blind crossover RCT enrolled 11 healthy males across four conditions: mephedrone 200 mg + ethanol 0.8 g/kg, mephedrone alone, alcohol alone, and placebo.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveAn observational study compared oral 150 mg and intranasal 70 mg mephedrone in 10 participants[23]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
comparative pharmacology5 claims5inconclusive
inconclusiveMephedrone is a weaker motor stimulant than methamphetamine in rodent locomotor assays.[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveAmphetamine (1 mg/kg) raises rat nucleus accumbens dopamine to 412% of baseline but serotonin to only 165% — a predominantly dopaminergic profile contrasting with mephedrone's balanced DA/5-HT release[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveThe structural and pharmacological parallels between mephedrone and MDMA are extensive: both are ring-substituted, N-methylated phenethylamine derivatives that function as non-selective monoamine transporter substrates with preferential serotonergic action[1]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveMephedrone produces approximately twice the dopamine release of equimolar MDMA while matching its serotonin release, combined with much faster elimination of both monoamines from the synapse[15]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
inconclusiveRing-substituted synthetic cathinones like mephedrone are transporter substrates (releasers), while pyrrolidine-containing cathinones such as MDPV are non-transported inhibitors (blockers)[20]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify claim against source text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 20, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | mephedrone | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary chemical identity data for mephedrone | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | mephedrone pharmacology mechanism dopamine serotonin transporter | 9 results, 6 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCore pharmacology papers with binding data and mechanism of action discarded 3: MDPV-focused paper (23072836) and general stimulant review (34396557) less central but retained for context | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | mephedrone toxicity overdose case report adverse effects | 3 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleToxicology case reports directly relevant to mephedrone safety discarded 1: U-47700 case (29745328) not relevant to mephedrone | |||
| 4literature search | OpenAlex | mephedrone 4-methylmethcathinone pharmacology | 15 results, 8 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHigh-citation landmark papers covering pharmacology, clinical toxicology, and mechanism of action discarded 7: Lower-relevance papers on synthetic cannabinoids, analytics, or broader NPS categories retained for context only | |||
| 5clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | mephedrone | 4 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHuman pharmacology Phase 1 trials directly relevant to mephedrone dosing, abuse liability, and alcohol interactions discarded 2: Chemsex studies address mephedrone indirectly in context of MSM drug use | |||
| 6document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 21072502, 21810934, 20358417 fetch | 3 results, 3 selected |
| 7literature search | PubMed | mephedrone human pharmacokinetics metabolism bioavailability | 2 results, 1 selected |
| 8literature search | PubMed | mephedrone dependence addiction abuse potential self-administration | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 9literature search | PubMed | mephedrone deaths fatalities post-mortem forensic | 3 results, 3 selected |
| 10literature search | PubMed | mephedrone subjective effects human study clinical trial | 3 results, 3 selected |
| 11clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | mephedrone | 4 results, 2 selected |
| 12document retrieval | OpenAlex | DOI 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02145.x (Simmler 2012) | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 13legal status search | Erowid/WebSearch | mephedrone legal status scheduling US UK Germany Australia | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 14web search | WebSearch | mephedrone first synthesis 1929 Saem de Burnaga Sanchez history | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 15literature search | PubMed | mephedrone cardiovascular cardiac effects blood pressure | 5 results, 4 selected |
| 16literature search | PubMed | mephedrone pharmacokinetics metabolites nor-mephedrone dihydromephedrone urine | 2 results, 2 selected |
| 17document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 22778288 serotonin syndrome mephedrone | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 18legal status search | WebSearch/Erowid | mephedrone legal status jurisdictions | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 19web search | WebSearch | mephedrone tramadol fatal interaction serotonin case report | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 1: No direct mephedrone-tramadol case report found; interaction listed as lethal in brief appears based on class-level serotonergic mechanism, not a specific published case | |||
| 20database lookup | Crossref/verify_doi | DOI 10.1007/s13181-011-0193-z | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 21web search | WebSearch | mephedrone SMILES CAS melting point physical properties | 10 results, 1 selected |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: Mephedrone
**PSX ID:** PSX-0243 | **Slug:** mephedrone | **Research Date:** 2026-04-20
**Provenance ID:** 25618495-032d-4439-b758-e10a0e03004e
---
## Chemical Identity
**Verified via PubChem CID 45266826 [database lookup confirmed]:**
- **Molecular formula:** C₁₁H₁₅NO *(confirms brief's blank; fills gap)*
- **Molecular weight:** 177.24 g/mol (free base); 213.70 g/mol as HCl salt *(fills gap)*
- **IUPAC name:** 2-(methylamino)-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one *(matches brief's systematic name)*
- **SMILES:** `Cc1ccc(cc1)C(=O)C(C)NC` *(fills blank in brief)*
- **InChIKey:** YELGFTGWJGBAQU-UHFFFAOYSA-N *(fills gap)*
- **CAS number:** 1189805-46-6 *(web-retrieved; not in brief)*
- **PubChem CID:** 45266826 *(fills blank in brief)*
**Physical properties (web-retrieved from Chemsrc/SWGDRUG [Ref 45]):**
- **Free base:** yellowish liquid at room temperature; MW 177.24; BP ~280°C at 760 mmHg
- **Hydrochloride salt:** white to off-white crystalline powder; MP ~249.6°C
- **Density:** ~0.987 g/cm³ (free base calculated)
- **Water solubility:** High in HCl salt form (enables oral, intranasal, and intravenous administration)
**Synonyms and street names:** 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC), 4-methyl-N-methylcathinone, drone, M-CAT, meow meow, miaow miaow, bubble, MMCAT. Also historically marketed under "bath salts" and "plant food" labels in the UK.
**Note on brief data:** The brief had blank SMILES, molecular formula, molecular weight, InChIKey, and PubChem CID fields. All have been filled via PubChem lookup (CID confirmed) and web-retrieved sources.
---
## Pharmacology
### Mechanism of Action
Mephedrone (4-MMC) is a β-keto amphetamine of the substituted cathinone class. It acts as a **non-selective substrate (releaser) at all three plasma membrane monoamine transporters** — the dopamine transporter (DAT), norepinephrine transporter (NET), and serotonin transporter (SERT) — causing carrier-mediated efflux (reverse transport) of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) (Baumann et al. 2012 [Ref 2]; Simmler et al. 2012 [Ref 19]).
The most recent and mechanistically detailed study (Mayer et al. 2023 [Ref 1]) establishes an important distinction: **mephedrone acts as a full substrate at human SERT but as only a partial substrate at human DAT**. Specifically, it shows greater efficacy as a releaser at hSERT than at hDAT compared to fully efficacious releasing agents (S(+)-amphetamine at DAT, para-chloroamphetamine at SERT). This release is sensitive to the protein kinase C inhibitor GF109203X, confirming carrier-mediated mechanism. Mephedrone is actively transported by both hDAT and hSERT.
**Key pharmacological profile points:**
- Mephedrone is NOT a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist, unlike classical amphetamines — this distinguishes its pharmacological fingerprint (Simmler et al. 2012 [Ref 19])
- Exhibits high blood-brain barrier permeability in vitro (among highest of all tested cathinones) (Simmler et al. 2012 [Ref 19])
- Can also induce monoamine release via OCT3 (organic cation transporter 3) when DAT is blocked, potentially explaining potentiation with MDPV (Mayer et al. 2019 [Ref 5])
- Does not directly affect major cardiac voltage-dependent ion channels at concentrations up to 30 μM (Meng et al. 2012 [Ref 29])
### Receptor Binding and Transporter Activity
In vitro characterization (Simmler et al. 2012 [Ref 19], HEK293 transfected cells):
- Mephedrone inhibits DA, NA, and 5-HT uptake with roughly **equal potency** at all three transporters (non-selective)
- Also induces 5-HT **efflux** (release), analogous to MDMA's entactogenic mechanism
- Classified in the "MDMA-like" group of cathinones: DAT/NET/SERT inhibitor + SERT releaser
Comparative neuropharmacology studies (Baumann et al. 2012 [Ref 2], rat brain synaptosomes):
- Mephedrone and methylone show profiles comparable to MDMA: nonselective substrates for plasma membrane monoamine transporters
- Both are structurally β-keto analogs of MDMA; weaker motor stimulants than methamphetamine
López-Arnau et al. 2012 [Ref 26] (comparative cathinones, rat brain):
- Mephedrone-induced hyperlocomotion was **dependent on endogenous 5-HT** (serotonin-mediated)
- Vesicular content plays a key role in mephedrone's 5-HT uptake inhibition
- Noradrenaline uptake inhibition potency suggests significant sympathetic effects
Baumann et al. 2018 [Ref 4] (comprehensive review):
- Ring-substituted cathinones like mephedrone are **transporter substrates** (releasers), contrasting with pyrrolidine-containing cathinones (e.g., MDPV) which are **non-transported inhibitors** (blockers)
- All synthetic cathinones increase extracellular monoamine concentrations, enhancing synaptic monoamine signaling
### In Vivo Neurochemical Effects
Kehr et al. 2011 [Ref 25] (awake rat nucleus accumbens microdialysis, 3 mg/kg s.c.):
- **Dopamine:** raised to **496%** of baseline; t½ for elimination ~25 min
- **Serotonin:** raised to **941%** of baseline; t½ for elimination ~26 min
- Comparison: MDMA (3 mg/kg) raised DA to 235%, 5-HT to 911%; amphetamine (1 mg/kg) raised DA to 412%, 5-HT to only 165%
- Mephedrone shows combined MDMA-like serotonergic AND amphetamine-like rapid dopaminergic release with fast elimination — a profile that may explain its potent reinforcing properties and compulsive redosing patterns
Baumann et al. 2012 [Ref 2] (rat nucleus accumbens, i.v. 0.3–1.0 mg/kg):
- Dose-related increases in extracellular DA and 5-HT; 5-HT effect proportionally greater
- Repeated dosing (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg s.c., ×3) caused hyperthermia but no long-term change in cortical/striatal amines (unlike MDMA which depletes 5-HT)
### Neurotoxicity
Hadlock et al. 2011 [Ref 9] (rat binge model, 4×10 or 25 mg/kg s.c., 2-h intervals):
- Caused **rapid decrease in striatal DAT and hippocampal SERT function**
- Like MDMA but unlike methamphetamine: produced **persistent serotonergic but not dopaminergic deficits**
- Self-administered by rodents (abuse liability confirmed)
Angoa-Pérez et al. 2017 [Ref 6] (review):
- Mephedrone at high/repeated doses can induce neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, temperature alterations, and dysregulation of monoamine systems in animal models
- Neurotoxic gauges similar to MDMA analogs
Den Hollander et al. 2013 [Ref 32]; 2014 [Ref 33]:
- Long-term neurochemical and behavioral changes in mice after repeated exposure
- MEMRI imaging revealed differential neuroadaptation compared to methamphetamine
**Caveat:** All neurotoxicity data are from animal (rodent) models. No controlled human neuroimaging studies of long-term mephedrone-induced neurotoxicity have been published.
---
## Pharmacokinetics
### Human Data (Oral Route)
**Olesti et al. 2017 [Ref 15]** (n=6 healthy males, 150 mg oral):
- Cmax = 122.6 ± 32.9 ng/mL
- Tmax = 1.0 hour (range 0.5–2h)
- Elimination t½ = 2.2 hours
- <15% of dose excreted as free (unchanged) mephedrone in urine
- Significant inter-subject variability in plasma concentrations
**Papaseit et al. 2016 [Ref 12]** (n=12 males, 200 mg oral, RCT NCT02232789):
- Tmax = 1.25 hours
- Elimination t½ = 2.15 hours
- Comparison: MDMA 100 mg had Tmax = 2.00h, t½ = 7.89h
**Olesti et al. 2019 [Ref 13]** (dose-response 50–200 mg oral, Phase I RCT):
- **Linear pharmacokinetics** confirmed across 50–200 mg dose range
- Plasma concentrations, cardiovascular/subjective effects, and blood serotonin concentrations all correlated in dose-dependent manner
### Human Data (Intranasal Route)
**Czerwinska et al. 2021 [Ref 24]** (n=6 healthy males, 100 mg insufflated):
- Mean Tmax = 52.5 ± 20.7 min in plasma; 55.0 ± 18.2 min in whole blood
- Mean t½ = 1.98 ± 0.30 h (plasma); 2.12 ± 0.33 h (whole blood)
- Whole blood:plasma distribution ratios: mephedrone 1.11, DHM 1.30, NOR 0.765
- Mephedrone and NOR detectable on Day 2 in some participants
**Papaseit et al. 2021 [Ref 28]** (observational, oral 150 mg vs. intranasal 70 mg, n=10):
- Both routes increase euphoria, well-being, and cardiovascular effects
- Intranasal route produces **higher mephedrone concentrations in oral fluid and urine per mg dose** compared to oral — suggesting greater bioavailability via intranasal route
### Metabolism
**Primary metabolic enzyme: CYP2D6** — confirmed in vitro (Pedersen et al. 2013 [Ref 31]) and in vivo in humans (Olesti et al. 2019 [Ref 13]).
**Identified metabolites** (Olesti et al. 2017 [Ref 30]; Czerwinska et al. 2021 [Ref 24]; Pedersen et al. 2013 [Ref 31]):
1. **4'-carboxy-mephedrone (4-CARBOXY)** — most abundant metabolite in plasma and urine; approximately 10× mephedrone in urine
2. **nor-mephedrone (NOR)** — second most abundant; secondary demethylation product
3. **dihydro-mephedrone (DHM)** — ~10% of mephedrone in plasma
4. **N-succinyl-nor-mephedrone** — longest half-life: **8.2 hours** (clinical detection window)
5. **hydroxytolyl-mephedrone (HYDROXY)** — identified in forensic cases
6. **4-carboxy-dihydro-mephedrone** — identified in forensic cases
**Active CNS metabolites:** Mephedrone and nor-mephedrone cross the blood-brain barrier in vivo in rats (Olesti et al. 2017 [Ref 30]).
**Clinical pharmacogenomics flag:** Individuals with no or low CYP2D6 functionality (poor/intermediate metabolizers) accumulate higher plasma mephedrone concentrations and face elevated risk of acute toxicity (Olesti et al. 2019 [Ref 13]).
### Animal PK Data
Aarde et al. 2013 [Ref 20] (rats): t½ ~1 hour in vivo in rat plasma; ~90 minutes in liver microsomal assays. Note: rat t½ is considerably shorter than human t½ ~2h.
---
## History
### First Synthesis (1929)
Mephedrone was first synthesized in **1929** by **Saem de Burnaga Sanchez**, published in the *Bulletin de la Société Chimique de France* under the name "toluyl-alpha-monomethylaminoethylcetone." The synthesis involved α-bromination of 1-tolylpropan-1-one followed by reaction with methylamine to produce racemic 4-methylmethcathinone. The compound remained a laboratory curiosity for over seven decades — no psychoactive properties were investigated or reported at the time [Ref 44].
### Rediscovery and Market Emergence
In **2003**, an anonymous chemist using the pseudonym "Kinetic" published the synthesis of mephedrone on *The Hive*, one of the earliest online forums for recreational chemistry. This constitutes the first modern publication of mephedrone's synthesis [Ref 44].
By **2007**, mephedrone was commercially available, primarily through Israeli head shops and early internet vendors. It was first banned in **Israel in December 2007**. By 2008, law enforcement agencies in the UK and Europe were becoming aware of the substance, with **Denmark and Sweden banning it in December 2008**.
Between **2009 and 2010**, mephedrone experienced explosive growth in the United Kingdom, marketed as "plant food," "bath salts," or "research chemicals" to circumvent drug laws. It became one of the most popular recreational drugs in the UK, particularly at festivals and nightclubs (Schifano et al. 2011 [Ref 8]).
### Regulatory History
| Jurisdiction | Date | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | December 2007 | First national ban |
| Denmark | December 15, 2008 | Controlled substance |
| Sweden | December 15, 2008 | Controlled substance |
| Germany | January 22, 2010 | Narcotics law amendment |
| Romania | February 2010 | Controlled |
| Netherlands | March 2010 | Controlled |
| Belgium | April 29, 2010 | Controlled |
| **United Kingdom** | **April 16, 2010** | **Class B, Misuse of Drugs Act** |
| France | June 2010 | Narcotics list |
| Russia/China | August–September 2010 | Controlled |
| European Union | October 2010 | EU-wide criminal law measures |
| **United States** | **October 2011** | **DEA emergency Schedule I (temporary)** |
| **United States** | **July 9, 2012** | **Permanent Schedule I (Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act 2012)** |
| Australia | By 2010 | Illegal for human consumption; major seizures 2008, 2010 |
| India | 2014–2015 | Controlled |
Source: Erowid Legal Status Database [Ref 37]; DEA press releases.
---
## Subjective Effects
### Published Data from Controlled Human Studies
**Papaseit et al. 2016 [Ref 12]** (NCT02232789, 12 male volunteers, single oral dose 200 mg, double-blind crossover RCT vs. MDMA 100 mg and placebo):
*Physiological effects:*
- Significant increases in **systolic and diastolic blood pressure**, **heart rate**, and **pupillary diameter**
- Earlier onset and shorter duration than MDMA
*Subjective effects:*
- **Stimulant-like effects** (energy, alertness, wakefulness)
- **Euphoria and well-being** comparable to MDMA ratings
- Mild changes in perceptions (minor perceptual distortions)
- Similar overall subjective profile to MDMA, but effects peaked earlier and were shorter in duration
*PK/PD relationship:*
- Earlier Tmax (1.25h vs 2.00h for MDMA) with shorter t½ (2.15h vs 7.89h for MDMA) — the shorter PK profile may drive more compulsive redosing patterns
**Papaseit et al. 2019 [Ref 14]** (NCT02294266, mephedrone 200 mg + alcohol 0.8 g/kg):
- Combination produced **more intense euphoria and well-being** than either drug alone
- Mephedrone **reduced sedative effects** of alcohol
- Combined cardiovascular effects amplified
- Abuse liability greater for combination than mephedrone alone
**Papaseit et al. 2021 [Ref 28]** (observational, oral vs. intranasal, n=10):
- Both routes increase euphoria, well-being, and cardiovascular measures
- No statistically significant difference in subjective effects between routes at observed doses (oral 150 mg vs. intranasal 70 mg)
### Community Survey Data
**Winstock et al. 2011 [Ref 17]** (large community survey, Addiction):
- Assessed use patterns, subjective effects, and dependence liability with corroborative urine toxicology
- Reported high rates of compulsive redosing
- Effects described: euphoria, stimulation, empathy enhancement, sociability
**Uosukainen et al. 2015 [Ref 34]** (Global Drug Survey cohort, self-reported dependence):
- Compared self-reported dependence symptoms for mephedrone vs. MDMA, cocaine, ketamine
- Mephedrone showed notable dependence liability in this non-treatment-seeking sample
### Duration Data from Literature
Based on human studies (Papaseit 2016 [Ref 12], Olesti 2017 [Ref 15], Czerwinska 2021 [Ref 24]):
- **Oral:** Onset 15–45 min (based on Tmax ~1h); peak effects ~1–2h; total duration consistent with 3–6h timeframe given short t½ (~2.2h) and clinical observations
- **Insufflated:** Faster onset (Tmax ~52 min); somewhat shorter peak
- The brief's existing duration data is broadly consistent with the pharmacokinetics. No controlled studies have formally measured duration-to-offset; the brief values appear reasonable from PK parameters and observational data.
### Effects Taxonomy Notes
The effects listed in the brief span stimulant and entactogen categories consistent with the dual DA/5-HT releasing mechanism:
- **Stimulant cluster** (DA/NE-mediated): stimulation, wakefulness, motivation enhancement, thought acceleration, sexual arousal enhancement, abnormal heartbeat, vasoconstriction
- **Entactogen cluster** (5-HT-mediated): empathy enhancement, music enhancement, touch enhancement, emotional warmth
- **Compulsive redosing** is documented empirically: Winstock 2011 [Ref 17]; mechanistic basis in rapid DA release/elimination (Kehr 2011 [Ref 25])
- **Olfactory hallucination** as a listed effect: Reported by users colloquially as "fish" smell — mechanism unclear; may be related to nor-mephedrone metabolite characteristics rather than true hallucination. Not documented in controlled studies; this specific effect is based on user reports only.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Acute Toxicity and Overdose
**No published human LD50 data exist for mephedrone.** The exact lethal dose in humans is unknown. The brief correctly notes this [FLAG: safety-critical value unconfirmed].
**Documented adverse effects in clinical/forensic contexts:**
*Sympathomimetic toxidrome* (Wood et al. 2010 [Ref 10]; Imam et al. 2013 [Ref 46]):
- Tachycardia, hypertension, chest pain
- Hyperthermia (in human clinical reports — contrast with rat models where hypothermia was observed at standard lab temperatures)
- Diaphoresis, agitation, psychomotor agitation
- Palpitations, pupillary dilation
*Serotonin syndrome* (Garrett & Sweeney 2010 [Ref 41], BMJ Case Report):
- 22-year-old male, presented to emergency department after mephedrone ingestion
- Features: tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertonia, hyperreflexia, **clonus**, hyperthermia
- Progressive deterioration over first hour
- Managed with appropriate serotonin syndrome treatment; sustained recovery over 15 hours
- This case establishes mephedrone alone can cause serotonin syndrome at recreational doses
*Cardiovascular effects* (Meng et al. 2012 [Ref 29], rat telemetry; Chojnacki et al. 2023 [Ref 27]):
- Dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output/ejection fraction
- No direct pro-arrhythmic effect on cardiac ion channels up to 30 μM (in vitro patch clamp)
- Effects persist after reserpine pretreatment — consistent with direct transporter mechanism rather than indirect catecholamine release
- Miller et al. 2013 [Ref 39]: Ambient temperature modulates cardiac and thermoregulatory effects significantly — relevant to rave/club environment risk
### Fatality Data
**Dickson et al. 2010 [Ref 7]** (first published mephedrone fatality case report):
- 22-year-old male; blood mephedrone 0.50 mg/L; concurrent heroin (morphine 0.06 mg/L blood)
- Cause of death: multiple-drug toxicity; mephedrone contribution could not be minimized at 0.50 mg/L
**Elliott & Evans 2014 [Ref 23]** (3-year casework review, UK, 2010–2012):
- Mephedrone was the **most frequently detected NPS** in forensic casework
- 84% of cases involved co-use of other substances or alcohol
- In drug-related fatalities, only 7% solely involved NPS; 41% of cathinone-related fatalities were hangings or other mechanical suicides
**Busardò et al. 2015 [Ref 11]** (systematic review of mephedrone-specific fatalities):
- Many early media reports attributed to mephedrone were found on analytical review to involve other substances
- Only a small number of fatalities had mephedrone confirmed as causative agent (as opposed to merely detected)
**Tyler et al. 2025 [Ref 36]** (chemsex-related deaths, UK, 2017–2022):
- 21 deaths in chemsex context; mephedrone was a key drug detected
- Provides contemporary forensic toxicology data on chemsex-associated mephedrone fatalities
**Forensic blood concentrations** (Pedersen et al. 2013 [Ref 31], traffic cases):
- Blood mephedrone: 1–51 μg/kg across 4 forensic traffic cases
### Thermoregulation
There is an apparent discrepancy between animal model data and human clinical observations:
- **Rat models:** Mephedrone consistently produces **hypothermia** at typical laboratory ambient temperatures (23°C) in Wistar rats (Shortall et al. 2013 [Ref 21]; Wright et al. 2012 [Ref 22]; Aarde et al. 2013 [Ref 20])
- **Human clinical reports:** Hyperthermia is documented in overdose/toxidrome cases
- **Resolution:** Miller et al. 2013 [Ref 39] demonstrated that **ambient temperature is a critical modifier** — higher ambient temperatures shift the thermoregulatory response. In hot club environments this likely produces hyperthermia; in controlled lab settings it causes hypothermia. Muskiewicz et al. 2020 [Ref 40] confirmed cathinones show less lethality via temperature dysregulation than MDMA or methamphetamine in rodent models.
### Psychological Risks
- Psychiatric symptoms including **paranoia, hallucinations, and anxiety** documented at high doses or after prolonged use (Angoa-Pérez et al. 2017 [Ref 6]; Weinstein et al. 2017)
- Case report of psychosis and shared delusional beliefs in mephedrone/bath salts users (Springs 2015)
- Luethi & Liechti 2020 [Ref 43]: cathinone intoxication can present with acute psychiatric symptoms indistinguishable from primary psychosis in emergency settings
---
## Harm Reduction
### Route-Specific Risks
**Insufflation:**
- Rapid onset increases compulsive redosing risk (shorter time to peak effect)
- Intranasal route produces higher concentration per mg dose (Papaseit 2021 [Ref 28])
- Nasal mucosal irritation expected given cathinone chemistry, though specific mephedrone nasal damage studies were not identified in published literature [FLAG: no primary data found]
**Oral:**
- Slower onset; longer total duration; potentially lower redosing compulsion per session
- Linear dose-response at 50–200 mg (Olesti 2019 [Ref 13]) allows more predictable titration
**Intravenous:**
- Dramatically increases bioavailability and CNS exposure
- No controlled IV human data exist; associated with highest risk profile
### Contraindications
Based on published literature — no formal contraindication list exists for mephedrone. Evidence-based risk factors for serious adverse outcomes:
- **CYP2D6 poor/intermediate metabolizers:** Elevated plasma exposure → higher toxicity risk (Olesti 2019 [Ref 13]) [FLAG: safety-critical, clinically relevant]
- **Pre-existing cardiovascular disease:** Mephedrone reliably increases HR, BP, cardiac output; no safe lower bound established
- **Concurrent serotonergic drugs** (SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, tramadol, lithium, triptans): Serotonin syndrome risk demonstrated for mephedrone alone (Garrett 2010 [Ref 41]); combination with other serotonergic agents substantially elevates this risk
- **Hot/warm environments (raves, clubs):** Thermoregulatory risk shifts from hypothermia to hyperthermia (Miller 2013 [Ref 39])
- **Alcohol co-use:** Amplified cardiovascular and euphoric effects with greater abuse liability (Papaseit 2019 [Ref 14])
### Emergency Response
- **Serotonin syndrome:** Managed with supportive care, benzodiazepines for agitation, cyproheptadine where appropriate; physical cooling for hyperthermia. Full recovery possible with appropriate treatment (Garrett 2010 [Ref 41])
- **Sympathomimetic toxidrome:** Supportive; benzodiazepines for agitation; avoid beta-blockers without alpha-blocker cover (unopposed alpha agonism risk)
- **Cardiovascular:** ECG monitoring; hypertension management
- No specific antidote
### Testing and Identification
No primary published data on mephedrone-specific reagent tests (Marquis, Simon's, etc.) were found in the indexed literature for this research output [FLAG: gap in harm reduction data]. Analytical identification methods are well-established via GC-MS and LC-MS/MS (Pedersen 2013 [Ref 31]; Olesti 2017 [Ref 30]).
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Preclinical Evidence
**Self-administration in rodents** (Aarde et al. 2013 [Ref 20]; Hadlock et al. 2011 [Ref 9]):
- Mephedrone reliably maintained self-administration in rats at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion
- Dose-substitution studies confirm dose-dependent reinforcing properties
- Progressive ratio breakpoints confirm motivational salience
**Stereochemistry and reward** (Philogene-Khalid et al. 2017 [Ref 16]):
- **R-enantiomer** primarily responsible for rewarding, reinforcing, and motivational properties
- R-MEPH showed higher break points under progressive ratio vs. S-MEPH
- R-MEPH elicited greater positive affect (50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations) in rats
- Sold commercially as racemate; the S-enantiomer contributes less to abuse liability
**Brain stimulation reward** (Bonano et al. 2014 [Ref 35]):
- Mephedrone dose-dependently facilitated intracranial self-stimulation in rats — consistent with abuse liability
### Human Evidence
**Winstock et al. 2011 [Ref 17]** (Addiction):
- Survey documented compulsive redosing and difficulty stopping during a session
- Dependence features reported by a subset of regular users
- Urine toxicology corroborated self-reported use patterns
**Uosukainen et al. 2015 [Ref 34]**:
- Self-reported last-year dependence symptoms for mephedrone compared to MDMA, cocaine, and ketamine in a large recreational poly-drug user sample
### Long-Term Effects
**Den Hollander et al. 2013 [Ref 32]** (mice, repeated exposure):
- Behavioral and neurochemical changes persisted after discontinuation
- Changes included alterations in anxiety-related behavior and monoamine system markers
**Hadlock et al. 2011 [Ref 9]** (rat binge model):
- Persistent serotonergic deficits (decreased hippocampal SERT function) after binge exposure — similar to MDMA profile but without dopaminergic deficits
### Tolerance Data from Brief
The brief lists: tolerance buildup with prolonged use; half-life 5 days; full reset 1.5 weeks; cross-tolerances: dopamine, stimulant. **No specific published primary source was identified for these values.** These appear to originate from the Psychonaut Wiki community synthesis or prior editorial entry. The cross-tolerance to dopaminergic and stimulant drugs is pharmacologically plausible given the mechanism, but the specific 5-day half-life and 1.5-week reset timeframes are **not confirmed by published research** [FLAG: safety-relevant values not verified against primary source].
---
## Interactions
### Alcohol (Controlled Human Data)
**Papaseit et al. 2019 [Ref 14]** (NCT02294266, RCT, n=11 males, 200 mg mephedrone + 0.8 g/kg ethanol):
- Combination produced **greater euphoria and well-being** than either drug alone
- Mephedrone **attenuated sedative effects** of alcohol — potentially masking alcohol intoxication levels
- **Amplified cardiovascular effects** (blood pressure, heart rate) relative to either drug alone
- Greater combined abuse liability
- PK: no significant pharmacokinetic interaction detected at these doses
- **Clinical significance:** High interaction — the combination is commonly used in recreational settings [Ref 14]
### Heroin / Opioids
**Dickson et al. 2010 [Ref 7]:**
- Fatal combination; blood mephedrone 0.50 mg/L with morphine 0.06 mg/L
- Mechanism: combined CNS stimulant + opioid respiratory depressant; cardiovascular interaction
### Tramadol (Listed as "Lethal" in Brief)
**No specific published case report of a mephedrone + tramadol fatality was identified in indexed literature.** The interaction labeled "lethal" in the brief appears to be based on class-level pharmacological reasoning rather than a specific documented case.
**Mechanistic basis:** Tramadol inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake and has weak serotonin-releasing properties. Combined with mephedrone (a potent serotonin releaser), the resulting serotonergic excess creates substantial risk for **serotonin syndrome**. The case report by Garrett & Sweeney (2010 [Ref 41]) establishes that mephedrone alone can cause serotonin syndrome. Tramadol is independently a known serotonin syndrome precipitant. The combination must be considered dangerous.
**[FLAG: The "lethal" classification in the brief is pharmacologically well-supported but lacks a specific published mephedrone+tramadol case report. The generation agent should classify this interaction as dangerous/potentially lethal based on serotonergic mechanism, noting the absence of a direct case report while citing the mechanistic evidence.]**
### MDMA
Both drugs raise synaptic 5-HT substantially; co-administration risks serotonin syndrome. No controlled human study exists for this combination. The brief lists this as "dangerous" — this is pharmacologically well-supported [Ref 1] [Ref 2].
### MDPV
**Mayer et al. 2019 [Ref 5]:** MDPV (a DAT/NET blocker) blocks conventional mephedrone-induced DA release via DAT, but mephedrone can still induce monoamine release via OCT3 when DAT is occupied. The combination may produce paradoxically potent and unpredictable psychostimulant effects — not simple additive but complex pharmacodynamic interaction.
### Cardiovascular Drugs
No specific published drug-drug interaction studies for cardiovascular medications (beta-blockers, antihypertensives) and mephedrone. Given mephedrone's reliable increases in HR and BP (Meng 2012 [Ref 29]; Chojnacki 2023 [Ref 27]), patients on antihypertensive therapy may experience unpredictable cardiovascular effects.
### MAOIs
No published data on mephedrone-MAOI combinations found. Given the mechanism (massive monoamine release), MAOIs would be expected to dramatically potentiate and prolong mephedrone's effects with life-threatening serotonergic and adrenergic risk. **This is a significant gap [FLAG].**
---
## Legal Status
| Jurisdiction | Status | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Class B | April 16, 2010 | Misuse of Drugs Act; criminal penalties for possession, supply |
| United States | Schedule I | July 9, 2012 | Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012; DEA temp scheduling Oct 2011 |
| European Union | Criminal law measures | October 2010 | EU-wide; implemented by member states individually |
| Denmark | Controlled | December 15, 2008 | Among first bans globally |
| Sweden | Controlled | December 15, 2008 | Among first bans globally |
| Germany | Controlled | January 22, 2010 | Narcotics Act amendment |
| Netherlands | Controlled | March 2010 | |
| Belgium | Controlled | April 29, 2010 | |
| France | Narcotic | June 2010 | |
| Israel | Controlled | December 2007 | First national ban globally |
| Australia | Illegal | By 2010 | Illegal for human consumption; Therapeutic Goods Act |
| Canada | Schedule I | 2012 | CDSA scheduling |
Source: Erowid Legal Status Database [Ref 37].
**Note on brief characterization ("emerging"):** While mephedrone is characterized as "emerging" in the brief's characterization field, it has been scheduled in all major Western jurisdictions since 2010–2012. The "emerging" tag likely refers to its status as a synthetic cathinone NPS rather than its current legal or market status. In the UK/Europe it is now an established controlled substance with an extensive published literature.
---
## Clinical Trials
**NCT02232789:** "Abuse Liability and Human Pharmacology of Mephedrone"
- Status: COMPLETED
- Phase: 1
- Sponsor: Parc de Salut Mar (Barcelona, Spain)
- Conditions: Amphetamine-Related Disorders
- Published output: Papaseit et al. 2016, *Neuropsychopharmacology* [Ref 12] — randomized double-blind crossover RCT, 12 males, single oral dose 200 mg mephedrone vs. 100 mg MDMA vs. placebo
**NCT02294266:** "Mephedrone and Alcohol Interactions in Humans"
- Status: COMPLETED
- Phase: 1
- Sponsor: Parc de Salut Mar (Barcelona, Spain)
- Conditions: Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Alcohol-Related Disorders
- Published output: Papaseit et al. 2019, *Frontiers in Pharmacology* [Ref 14] — double-blind crossover RCT, 11 males, 4 conditions (mephedrone+alcohol, mephedrone alone, alcohol alone, placebo)
No active or recruiting trials for mephedrone were identified as of April 2026.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### 🚩 Safety-Critical Values Not Confirmed
1. **Exact lethal dose / LD50 in humans:** Not published. Toxic dose range entirely unknown. Brief correctly notes this.
2. **Tramadol interaction classified as "lethal":** No specific mephedrone+tramadol case report found in indexed literature. Danger classification is pharmacologically sound (both serotonergic → serotonin syndrome) but is based on class mechanism, not a primary case report. **Generation agent should document this gap explicitly and cite the mechanistic basis.**
3. **Tolerance half-life (5 days) and full reset (1.5 weeks):** Not confirmed against any published primary source. Appears to be community-derived data. Label as unverified/community consensus in the article.
4. **Dose sensitivity field:** The brief has this blank. No published human dose-finding study specifically characterized dose sensitivity beyond the clinical trials at 50–200 mg oral. Published dose data suggest the brief's listed ranges (insufflated 5–125+ mg; oral 15–300+ mg) are plausible but no systematic threshold study exists.
### 🔍 Data Absent from Literature
5. **Mephedrone-MAOI interaction:** No published data found. High-risk mechanism; must flag as contraindicated based on class reasoning.
6. **Nasal damage specific to mephedrone insufflation:** No primary studies found. General cathinone-related nasal irritation expected but undocumented.
7. **Pregnancy/reproductive safety:** No published data.
8. **Specific IC50 values (nM) at human DAT/NET/SERT:** Available in full text of Simmler 2012 [Ref 19] and Baumann 2012 [Ref 2] but were not extractable from abstracts in this research run. Full-text access would be needed to populate pharmacology tables with exact Ki/EC50 values.
9. **Mephedrone reagent testing profiles:** No published primary data on colorimetric reagent test results (Marquis, Mecke, Simon's, etc.) identified.
10. **Dependence data (formal):** No controlled human dependence/withdrawal studies published. Brief's dependence section is blank — confirm no primary data exist.
### ⚠️ Cross-Source Discrepancies
11. **Characterization tag "emerging":** Mephedrone has extensive published literature (>300 primary papers) and has been controlled since 2010–2012. The "emerging" tag may reflect classification schema rather than current status. Generation agent should address this.
12. **Physical form discrepancy:** The free base is a liquid at room temperature, not a crystalline solid. The HCl salt (most commonly encountered form) is the white crystalline powder associated with recreational use. Generation agent should clarify this in chemistry section.
13. **SMILES in brief was blank:** Filled — `Cc1ccc(cc1)C(=O)C(C)NC`. PubChem CID 45266826 confirmed.
### 📊 Structural Analogy Sections
14. **MAOI interaction risk:** Based on amphetamine/stimulant class reasoning, not mephedrone-specific data.
15. **Oral bioavailability (% absorbed):** Not directly measured in published human studies. Can be inferred from comparative plasma concentrations between oral and IV routes, but IV human data don't exist.
---
*Research conducted 2026-04-20 | 48 citations in registry | 21 research steps logged*
*Provenance ID: 25618495-032d-4439-b758-e10a0e03004e*