generation run 2026-05-11
59 min completedmodel pipeline-v5plan not recordedrun/28857926…Selection
Verification
- record
- seen / partial
- working
The model's own caveats
- sparse_evidence
- sparse_evidence
- structural_inference
Reproduce
- inputs
- 33 source keys (listed under Sources)
- plan
- not recorded — template version, prompt hash and git SHA are written from 2026-09 onward
- model
- pipeline-v5
- streams
- none — agent transcripts are persisted from 2026-09 onward
18 searches — query, source, results, what was kept and why
| # | source | query | seen | kept | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAlex | JWH-073 synthetic cannabinoid | 10 | 6 | — |
| 2 | PubMed | JWH-073 synthetic cannabinoid toxicity case report | 4 | 4 | — |
| 3 | PubMed | JWH-073 cannabinoid pharmacology receptor binding | 7 | 7 | — |
| 4 | PubChem | JWH-073 | 1 | 1 | — |
| 5 | PubMed | naphthoylindole cannabinoid receptor binding affinity structure activity | 4 | 4 | — |
| 6 | PubMed | JWH-073 metabolism pharmacokinetics human urine | 5 | 5 | — |
| 7 | ClinicalTrials.gov · absence | JWH-073 synthetic cannabinoid | 0 | — | — |
| 8 | PubMed | synthetic cannabinoid spice K2 dependence withdrawal abuse | 5 | 5 | — |
| 9 | Web | JWH-073 DEA Schedule I scheduling date United States 2011 | 10 | 2 | — |
| 10 | Erowid | JWH-073 experience reports subjective effects | 4 | — | — |
| 11 | Web | JWH-073 legal status UK Australia Canada EU | 10 | 1 | — |
| 12 | PubMed | Cooper controlled administration JWH-073 JWH-018 smoked human | 1 | 1 | — |
| 13 | PubMed | JWH-073 metabolism pharmacokinetics human urine | 5 | 2 | — |
| 14 | PubMed | JWH-073 JWH-210 pharmacokinetic behavioral profile THC rats | 1 | 1 | — |
| 15 | Cayman Chemical | JWH-073 physical properties | 1 | 1 | — |
| 16 | Web | JWH-073 discovery synthesis history John Huffman Clemson University | 10 | 1 | — |
| 17 | PubMed | JWH-073 carboxylic acid metabolite detection times human urine | 2 | 1 | — |
| 18 | Web | JWH-073 Ki binding affinity CB1 CB2 nM values pharmacology | 10 | 1 | — |
188 claims by section — every cited sentence, checked against its source
safety68 · 12 ok
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Full agonism permits dose-dependent escalation of effects without the ceiling imposed by partial agonist pharmacology, producing a steeper dose-toxicity gradient.supported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis. 0269881114565142
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
JWH-073 induced membrane damage in buccal epithelial (TR146) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines at concentrations ≥75–100 µMpartially supported
JWH-018 causes cell membrane damage at ≥75-100 µM; anti-estrogenic effects; no estrogenic activity; no cytokine release effects in PBMCs at realistic concentrations. s00204-013-1029-1
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Population-level data identify tachycardia as the single most common adverse presentation (37–77% of synthetic cannabinoid emergency cases).supported
Most common: tachycardia (37-77%), agitation (16-41%), nausea (13-94%). 15563650.2015.1110590
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, including JWH-073, carry psychotomimetic risk exceeding that of Δ9-THCsupported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis. 0269881114565142
Three factors converge to elevate this risk: full CB1 agonism (producing greater receptor activation than the partial agonist THC), higher potency (lower doses needed for equivalent receptor occupancy), and absence of cannabidiol (CBD), which in natural cannabis may moderate psychosis risk.supported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis. 0269881114565142
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Psychosis-like conditions occur more frequently with synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists than with natural cannabis, particularly in inexperienced users and those with pre-existing psychiatric vulnerability. anxiety, paranoia, and confusion appear to be dose-dependent, though the absence of controlled human data prevents quantification of incidence at specific dose levels.supported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis; reviews general toxicity profile and psychosis risk of synthetic cannabinoids. 0269881114565142
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Physical and psychological-dependence on JWH-073 and related synthetic cannabinoids is documented in clinical literaturesupported
Review of SC pharmacology, adverse effects of acute intoxication and withdrawal from daily use. Withdrawal symptom relief reported with benzodiazepines and quetiapine. s11920-016-0694-1
Physical and psychological-dependence on JWH-073 and related synthetic cannabinoids is documented in clinical literaturesupported
Case series and systematic review; SC effects similar to marijuana; cases of dependence; SC effectively alleviates cannabis withdrawal. j.1521-0391.2012.00240.x
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Some symptom relief has been reported with benzodiazepines (for agitation) and quetiapine (for psychosis)supported
Withdrawal symptom relief reported with benzodiazepines and quetiapine. s11920-016-0694-1
Users may substitute synthetic cannabinoid products to manage cannabis withdrawal.supported
SC effectively alleviates cannabis withdrawal. j.1521-0391.2012.00240.x
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
History of psychosis or schizophrenia (absolute): full CB1 agonism at synthetic cannabinoid potency carries markedly elevated risk of precipitating acute psychotic episodes. The absence of CBD moderation in synthetic cannabinoid products removes a potential protective factor present in cannabis.supported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis. 0269881114565142
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
A systematic review of approximately 4,000 synthetic cannabinoid cases identified at least 26 deaths across the broader class, though JWH-073-specific mortality cannot be isolated from aggregate reporting.supported
Systematic review of ~4000 SC cases including ~26 deaths; major complications: cardiovascular events, AKI, seizures, psychosis. 15563650.2015.1110590
pharmacology34 · 0 ok
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
summary18 · 2 ok
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
The compound entered recreational markets in early 2009 as a replacement for JWH-018 following the latter's prohibition in Germany, and was permanently placed in Schedule I under the US Controlled Substances Act in March 2012partially supported
Monitoring of 140+ Spice products; JWH-018 identified in December 2008; product compositions changed repeatedly due to prohibition. jms.1811
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Full CB1 agonist status confers a higher ceiling for toxicity than Δ9-THC, and case reports document seizures, cardiotoxicity, and multi-organ dysfunction associated with synthetic cannabinoid products containing JWH-073. tolerance develops through CB1 receptor desensitization and downregulation; physical and psychological-dependence are documented at moderate severitypartially supported
Systematic review of ~4000 SC cases including ~26 deaths; major complications: cardiovascular events, AKI, seizures, psychosis. 15563650.2015.1110590
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
comparative-pharmacology12 · 1 ok
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
This difference confers several clinically important properties to JWH-073:supported
SCRAs are full agonists, more potent than THC, contain no CBD — higher psychosis-inducing potential than cannabis. 0269881114565142
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
neuroscience12 · 0 ok
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
pharmacokinetic-detail12 · 0 ok
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
receptor-pharmacology12 · 0 ok
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in receptor-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
clinical-evidence10 · 0 ok
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
chemistry6 · 0 ok
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in chemistry — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →