Hexedrone
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 30 mg | 30 mg | low |
| Low | 50–70 mg | 50–70 mg | low |
| Common | 70–100 mg | 70–100 mg | low |
| Strong | 100–125 mg | 100–125 mg | low |
| Heavy | 125+ mg | 125+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Dose ranges from existing DB seed data, consistent with PsychonautWiki/KnowDrugs community consensus. No controlled human dose-response study exists for hexedrone. All values are community-derived and safety-critical — flagged for reviewer verification. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDose ranges from existing DB seed data, consistent with PsychonautWiki/KnowDrugs community consensus. No controlled human dose-response study exists for hexedrone. All values are community-derived and safety-critical — flagged for reviewer verification. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. No controlled study for hexedrone oral onset. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. No controlled study for hexedrone oral onset. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 10–20 minutes | 10–20 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No data available for hexedrone come_up. Estimated from cathinone class (pentedrone, NEH) typical come_up ranges per work-notes instruction. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo data available for hexedrone come_up. Estimated from cathinone class (pentedrone, NEH) typical come_up ranges per work-notes instruction. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No data available for hexedrone peak duration. Estimated from cathinone class typical peak ranges per work-notes. Consistent with short total duration (1–4h). | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo data available for hexedrone peak duration. Estimated from cathinone class typical peak ranges per work-notes. Consistent with short total duration (1–4h). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Offsettrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No data available for hexedrone offset duration. Estimated from cathinone class typical offset ranges per work-notes. Arithmetic consistent with total duration minus other phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo data available for hexedrone offset duration. Estimated from cathinone class typical offset ranges per work-notes. Arithmetic consistent with total duration minus other phases. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Totaltrace | 1–4 hours | 1–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. Short total duration is a defining characteristic of hexedrone relative to other cathinones. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. Short total duration is a defining characteristic of hexedrone relative to other cathinones. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 1–12 hours | 1–12 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. Wide range reflects dose-dependent variation; aftereffects disproportionately long relative to primary effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus from PsychonautWiki/existing DB seed data. Wide range reflects dose-dependent variation; aftereffects disproportionately long relative to primary effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | low |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, renal, neuropsychiatric | cardiovascular, renal, neuropsychiatric | low |
| Editorial | Acute and chronic toxicity rated moderate per work-notes. Evidence discount applied: all data from NEH analog (N-ethyl), not hexedrone (N-methyl). Fatal cases involved polydrug use and pre-existing cardiac disease as co-factors. Narrow gap between non-fatal (≤97.2 ng/mL) and fatal (145 ng/mL) blood concentrations for NEH suggests limited safety margin, but hexedrone-specific data is absent. Hexedrone (N-methyl) may be slightly less potent/toxic than NEH per SAR reasoning. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute and chronic toxicity rated moderate per work-notes. Evidence discount applied: all data from NEH analog (N-ethyl), not hexedrone (N-methyl). Fatal cases involved polydrug use and pre-existing cardiac disease as co-factors. Narrow gap between non-fatal (≤97.2 ng/mL) and fatal (145 ng/mL) blood concentrations for NEH suggests limited safety margin, but hexedrone-specific data is absent. Hexedrone (N-methyl) may be slightly less potent/toxic than NEH per SAR reasoning. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | moderate | moderate | low |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | high | high | low |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify moderate physical, moderate-high psychological dependence, high compulsive redosing risk. All values extrapolated from NEH transporter data (Kolaczynska 2021, Persson 2024) and cathinone class dependence literature. No hexedrone-specific dependence study exists. Psychological dependence proposed as 'moderate' (schema cap) despite work-notes suggesting moderate-high — flagged for reviewer. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify moderate physical, moderate-high psychological dependence, high compulsive redosing risk. All values extrapolated from NEH transporter data (Kolaczynska 2021, Persson 2024) and cathinone class dependence literature. No hexedrone-specific dependence study exists. Psychological dependence proposed as 'moderate' (schema cap) despite work-notes suggesting moderate-high — flagged for reviewer. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | moderate | moderate | low |
| Symptoms | depression, anhedonia, irritability, cognitive fatigue, hypersomnia, increased appetite, abulia, psychomotor slowing | depression, anhedonia, irritability, cognitive fatigue, hypersomnia, increased appetite, abulia, psychomotor slowing | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | Withdrawal characterization inferred from NEH clinical case series recovery timeline (Lefeuvre 2024) and cathinone class dopaminergic rebound syndrome. Symptoms consistent with post-intoxication state documented in NEH cases: anhedonia, abulia, depression, psychomotor slowing. No hexedrone-specific withdrawal study. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWithdrawal characterization inferred from NEH clinical case series recovery timeline (Lefeuvre 2024) and cathinone class dopaminergic rebound syndrome. Symptoms consistent with post-intoxication state documented in NEH cases: anhedonia, abulia, depression, psychomotor slowing. No hexedrone-specific withdrawal study. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 10.5 days | 10.5 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | amphetamines, cocaine, cathinones, dopaminergic stimulants | amphetamines, cocaine, cathinones, dopaminergic stimulants | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus values from PsychonautWiki carried forward from seed data. Tolerance mechanism inferred from cathinone NDRI pharmacology. No hexedrone-specific or NEH-specific tolerance study exists. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus values from PsychonautWiki carried forward from seed data. Tolerance mechanism inferred from cathinone NDRI pharmacology. No hexedrone-specific or NEH-specific tolerance study exists. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | NEH analog case report (Kovács 2019) documents pre-existing cardiac disease as co-factor in fatality. Class-level sympathomimetic toxidrome applies to all cathinone NDRIs. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNEH analog case report (Kovács 2019) documents pre-existing cardiac disease as co-factor in fatality. Class-level sympathomimetic toxidrome applies to all cathinone NDRIs. | |||
| other Concurrent MAOI usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for all cathinone/NDRI stimulants. No hexedrone-specific interaction data exists, but the pharmacological mechanism makes this interaction predictable and potentially fatal. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for all cathinone/NDRI stimulants. No hexedrone-specific interaction data exists, but the pharmacological mechanism makes this interaction predictable and potentially fatal. | |||
| renal Renal impairmenttrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Single NEH fatal case report (Domagalska 2021) documented acute kidney failure. Class-level renal risk from sympathomimetic hyperthermia applies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSingle NEH fatal case report (Domagalska 2021) documented acute kidney failure. Class-level renal risk from sympathomimetic hyperthermia applies. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class inference from cathinone stimulant pharmacology plus mention of seizure history in NEH fatality (Kovács 2019). No hexedrone-specific seizure data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from cathinone stimulant pharmacology plus mention of seizure history in NEH fatality (Kovács 2019). No hexedrone-specific seizure data. | |||
| psychiatric Psychotic spectrum and mood disorderstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level evidence from cathinone literature (Weinstein 2017) and NEH clinical case series (Lefeuvre 2024) documenting post-intoxication psychiatric symptoms. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level evidence from cathinone literature (Weinstein 2017) and NEH clinical case series (Lefeuvre 2024) documenting post-intoxication psychiatric symptoms. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancy and lactationtrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | No data available; class-level precautionary contraindication for all stimulant cathinones due to sympathomimetic cardiovascular and thermal stress. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo data available; class-level precautionary contraindication for all stimulant cathinones due to sympathomimetic cardiovascular and thermal stress. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 900–1800 sec(i=0.20) | 900–1800 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Duration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDuration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 600–1200 sec(i=0.50) | 600–1200 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Duration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDuration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Duration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDuration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Duration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDuration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–43200 sec(i=0.15) | 3600–43200 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | Duration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDuration phases derived from work-notes: onset 15–30 min (community consensus), come_up 10–20 min (cathinone class estimate), peak 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), offset/resolution 30–60 min (cathinone class estimate), afterglow 1–12 h (community consensus). No controlled pharmacokinetic study for hexedrone oral route. All phase estimates except onset and afterglow are class-level inferences from cathinone pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
Minimal stimulation detectable as a subtle increase in alertness and wakefulness. Mood may lift slightly, but pronounced euphoria is absent. Cognitive effects are negligible — no meaningful focus enhancement or thought acceleration at this level. Physical effects are mild: a faint increase in heart rate may be perceptible but cardiovascular stress is minimal. Appetite suppression is absent or barely noticeable. No significant vasoconstriction or bruxism. Duration commitment is short — effects resolve within 1–2 hours. Sleep is unlikely to be significantly disrupted if dosed early. The compulsive redosing urge that characterizes higher doses is not yet present at threshold.
Work-notes threshold description (~30 mg oral). No controlled dose-response data exists; values extrapolated from community consensus (PsychonautWiki) and cathinone class pharmacology.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes threshold description (~30 mg oral). No controlled dose-response data exists; values extrapolated from community consensus (PsychonautWiki) and cathinone class pharmacology.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Mild stimulation with a noticeable mood lift becomes apparent. Focus enhancement and motivation enhancement emerge as subtle but functional effects. Thought acceleration is slight — enough to notice increased mental tempo without feeling pressured. Cardiovascular effects begin to appear: elevated heart rate becomes perceptible, and mild appetite suppression sets in. Sweating and vasoconstriction are minimal. Bruxism is unlikely at this tier. The experience lasts 1–3 hours with aftereffects extending several hours beyond. Sleep may be delayed if dosed in the evening. The compulsive redosing urge is weak but may emerge toward the tail end of effects.
Work-notes light tier description (50–70 mg oral). Community consensus values from PsychonautWiki. No controlled human data.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes light tier description (50–70 mg oral). Community consensus values from PsychonautWiki. No controlled human data.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Clear stimulant effects dominate: euphoria, enhanced focus, thought acceleration, and increased sociability form the core experience. Analysis enhancement and motivation enhancement are noticeable. Music enhancement and immersion enhancement may be present. Disinhibition and ego inflation emerge at this tier. Physical effects become apparent — appetite suppression, vasoconstriction, and bruxism are common. Heart rate and blood pressure are elevated. Excessive sweating and dehydration sensation may occur. Spontaneous body sensations are possible. The compulsive redosing urge becomes a defining feature at common doses. The short total duration (1–4 hours) combined with this urge creates significant binge risk. Aftereffects — including irritability, low mood, and cognitive fatigue — may persist 1–12 hours. Sleep is impossible for several hours after the last dose.
Work-notes common tier description (70–100 mg oral). Community consensus plus cathinone NDRI class pharmacology. All effects consistent with DAT-selective reuptake inhibition profile.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes common tier description (70–100 mg oral). Community consensus plus cathinone NDRI class pharmacology. All effects consistent with DAT-selective reuptake inhibition profile.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Pronounced euphoria and stimulation with marked time alteration. Ego inflation and disinhibition are prominent. Focus enhancement may become counterproductive — thought acceleration can shift toward racing thoughts. The compulsive redosing urge is intense at this tier. Cardiovascular effects are significant: tachycardia, hypertension, and vasoconstriction are pronounced. Bruxism, excessive sweating, and dehydration sensation are common. Abnormal heartbeat may be perceptible. Sexual arousal suppression is typical. Aftershock effects are prolonged and uncomfortable — depression, irritability, cognitive fatigue, motivation suppression, and thought deceleration may persist for many hours. Sleep disruption extends well beyond the primary experience. Risk of anxiety and paranoia increases at this dose level.
Work-notes strong tier description (100–125 mg oral). Community consensus extrapolated with cathinone class adverse effect profile. Cardiovascular risk escalation consistent with sympathomimetic toxidrome.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes strong tier description (100–125 mg oral). Community consensus extrapolated with cathinone class adverse effect profile. Cardiovascular risk escalation consistent with sympathomimetic toxidrome.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Intense stimulation with substantial cardiovascular risk. Euphoria may be overshadowed by anxiety, paranoia, and psychomotor agitation. Thought disorganization may replace the focused thought acceleration of lower tiers. Decision impairment becomes significant. Cardiovascular toxicity is the primary acute danger: severe tachycardia, hypertension, and hyperthermia are possible. Fatal NEH intoxications occurred at postmortem blood concentrations only modestly above non-fatal levels, suggesting a narrow safety margin. Acute kidney failure was documented in one NEH fatality. Abnormal heartbeat, excessive sweating, and pronounced vasoconstriction are expected. The comedown is severe — depression, anhedonia, cognitive fatigue, motivation suppression, and irritability may persist for 12+ hours. The compulsive redosing urge at this tier drives dangerous binge patterns. Pre-existing cardiac conditions dramatically increase the risk of fatal outcome.
Work-notes heavy tier description (125+ mg oral). NEH fatal case data (145–285 ng/mL postmortem) informs cardiovascular risk language. All toxicity data from NEH analog, not hexedrone itself.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes heavy tier description (125+ mg oral). NEH fatal case data (145–285 ng/mL postmortem) informs cardiovascular risk language. All toxicity data from NEH analog, not hexedrone itself.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateThe Pharmacological Profile of Second Generation Pyrovalerone Cathinones and Related Cathinone Derivative.Kolaczynska KE, Thomann J, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2021 · International journal of molecular sciences
- [2]moderateCharacterization of neurotransmitter inhibition for seven cathinones by a proprietary fluorescent dye method.Persson M, Vikingsson S, Kronstrand R, Green H · 2024 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [3]weakHexedrone (HEX) first seizure reported to EMCDDA by PolandEMCDDA Early Warning System · 2013linkno claims checked
- [4]moderateIdentification and structural characterization of four novel synthetic cathinones: α-methylaminohexanophenone (hexedrone, HEX), 4-bromoethcathinone (4-BEC), 4-chloro-α-pyrrolidinopropiophenone (4-Cl-PPP), and 4-bromo-α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (4-Br-PVP) after their seizuresBłażewicz A, Bednarek E, Sitkowski J, Popławska M, Stypułkowska K, Bocian W, Kozerski L · 2017 · Forensic Toxicologydoi.org/10.1007/s11419-017-0360-23 claims checked3 inconclusive
- [5]weakFatal intoxication of a regular drug user following N-ethyl-hexedrone and ADB-FUBINACA consumptionKovács K, Kereszty É, Berkecz R, Tiszlavicz L, et al. · 2019 · Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
- [6]weakHexedrone dose and tolerance data (user-consensus)PsychonautWiki / KnowDrugs community consensus · 2024linkno claims checked
- [7]weakN-Ethylhexedrone: A very long and bad trip! A case seriesLefeuvre S, Richeval C, Lelong J, Venisse N, Humbert L, Brunet B · 2024 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [8]weakFatal N-Ethylhexedrone IntoxicationDomagalska E, Banaszkiewicz L, Woźniak MK, Kata M, Szpiech B, Kaliszan M · 2021 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [9]weakSchedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of N-Ethylhexedrone, alpha-Pyrrolidinohexanophenone [et al.] in Schedule IDrug Enforcement Administration, US DOJ · 2022 · Federal Registerlinkno claims checked
- [10]weakN-Ethylhexedrone added to UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances Schedule II (March 2020)UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs · 2020linkno claims checked
- [11]moderate
- [12]moderateSynthetic Cathinones: Recent Developments, Enantioselectivity Studies and Enantioseparation MethodsAlmeida AS, Silva B, Guedes de Pinho P, Remião F, Fernandes C · 2022 · Molecules
- [13]moderateGC-MS/MS Determination of N-ethyl Pentedrone and N-ethyl Hexedrone in Oral Fluid and Sweat after Controlled AdministrationNuñez-Montero M, Lombroni C, Maida N, et al. · 2023 · International journal of molecular sciences
- [14]moderateIn vitro metabolic profile of mexedrone, a mephedrone analog, studied by high- and low-resolution mass spectrometryCamuto C, Guglielmelli A, De-Giorgio F, et al. · 2022 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [15]moderateCharacterization of in vitro metabolites of methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV)Kim IS, Rehman SU, Choi MS, et al. · 2016 · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
- [16]moderateStructure-Activity Relationship of N-Ethyl-Hexedrone Analogues: Role of the alpha-Carbon Side-Chain LengthNadal-Gratacós N, Ríos-Rodríguez E, Pubill D, et al. · 2023 · ACS chemical neuroscience
- [17]moderateStructure-activity relationships of bath salt components: substituted cathinones and benzofurans at biogenic amine transporters.Eshleman AJ, Nagarajan S, Wolfrum KM, Reed JF, Swanson TL, Nilsen A, Janowsky A · 2019 · Psychopharmacology
- [18]strongComprehensive review of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs and related agentsMladenka P, Applova L, Patocka J, Costa VM, Remiao F · 2018 · Medicinal Research Reviews
- [19]moderateSynthetic Cathinone and Cannabinoid Designer Drugs Pose a Major Risk for Public HealthWeinstein A, Rosca P, Fattore L, London ED · 2017 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
- [20]weakSevere Toxicity to the New Psychoactive Substances 3-Hydroxyphencyclidine and N-Ethylhexedrone: an Analytically Confirmed Case ReportDunlop LC, Wood D, Archer J, Hudson S, Dargan P · 2020 · Journal of Medical Toxicology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary6 claims4verified1inconclusive1not supported
inconclusiveHexedrone was first reported to the EMCDDA Early Warning System by Poland in July 2013 and formally characterized from seized samples by Błażewicz et al. in 2017[4]model confidence 100%
Abstract was not available for this paper.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAs a DAT-selective NDRI, hexedrone is presumed to potentiate dopaminergic and noradrenergic signaling without inducing monoamine efflux — a mechanism confirmed for NEH, which shows DAT IC₅₀ values of 44.5–170 nM and negligible serotonin transporter activity (SERT IC₅₀ >10 µM)[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms NEH DAT IC50=0.17µM (170 nM), SERT >10µM, DAT/SERT ratio 264–356, and no monoamine efflux — supporting the NDRI mechanism and DAT selectivity. The 44.5 nM value comes from a companion citation [24].
NEH: DAT IC50=0.17 µM, NET IC50=0.18 µM, SERT >10 µM. DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. No monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAs a DAT-selective NDRI, hexedrone is presumed to potentiate dopaminergic and noradrenergic signaling without inducing monoamine efflux — a mechanism confirmed for NEH, which shows DAT IC₅₀ values of 44.5–170 nM and negligible serotonin transporter activity (SERT IC₅₀ >10 µM)[2]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms NEH DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM and DAT/SERT ratio in hundreds (implying negligible SERT activity), supporting the NDRI/DAT-selective characterization.
NEH (N-ethylhexedrone) DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM, more potent than cocaine (111 nM) and amphetamine (257 nM). All 7 cathinones showed DAT > NET > SERT profile. DAT/SERT ratio for NEH in hundreds (highly selective).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedFatal intoxications from NEH have occurred at postmortem blood concentrations of 145–285 ng/mL, with hyperthermia exceeding 41 °C, severe tachycardia, and acute kidney failure documented in case reports[5]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms the 285 ng/mL postmortem NEH concentration in a fatal case. The hyperthermia/tachycardia/AKF details come from the Domagalska [16] case; the claim attributes these to 'case reports' (plural), so this citation supports the fatal intoxication and 285 ng/mL upper bound.
Postmortem blood NEH: 285 ng/mL. NEH concluded primary cause of death.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
not supportedFatal intoxications from NEH have occurred at postmortem blood concentrations of 145–285 ng/mL, with hyperthermia exceeding 41 °C, severe tachycardia, and acute kidney failure documented in case reports[7]model confidence 92%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
This paper reports three NON-fatal intoxication cases. Plasma concentrations are in the µg/L range (not postmortem 145–285 ng/mL), and the documented symptoms (anxiety, persecution, anhedonia, SIADH, intubation) are entirely different from the hyperthermia >41°C, severe tachycardia, and acute kidney failure claimed. This citation does not support the specific claim about fatal intoxications at those postmortem concentrations with that toxidrome.
Clinical effects: anxiety, feelings of persecution, asthenia, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing, loss of consciousness. Plasma NEH: 97.2→0.7 µg/L (Day 1→7, Case 1). 2/3 patients required intubation/ventilation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedFatal intoxications from NEH have occurred at postmortem blood concentrations of 145–285 ng/mL, with hyperthermia exceeding 41 °C, severe tachycardia, and acute kidney failure documented in case reports[8]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all specific elements: postmortem NEH 145 ng/mL, hyperthermia >41°C, tachycardia >160 bpm, acute kidney failure, and fatal outcome.
Hyperthermia >41°C, tachycardia >160 bpm, tachypnea 20 breaths/min, BP 110/60 mmHg, acute kidney failure. Death after a few hours. Postmortem blood NEH: 145 ng/mL.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
history2 claims1verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe first formal published characterization came from Błażewicz et al. (2017), who identified hexedrone (α-methylaminohexanophenone, HEX) alongside three other novel cathinones — 4-BEC, 4-Cl-PPP, and 4-Br-PVP — from seized drug samples in Poland[4]model confidence 100%
Abstract was not available for this paper.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedNEH rapidly became one of the most widely available cathinone stimulants on European NPS markets; by 2017 it was the most frequently seized stimulant designer drug in Hungary.[5]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states NEH was the most frequently seized stimulant designer drug in Hungary in 2017.
Hungary: NEH most frequently seized stimulant designer drug in 2017.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
chemistry2 claims2inconclusive
inconclusiveAs with other cathinones, the (S)-enantiomer is predicted to be the more pharmacologically active isomer at monoamine transporters, based on enantioselectivity patterns established across the cathinone class[12]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms cathinone enantioselectivity exists ('different biological and toxicological activities between enantiomers') but does not specify which enantiomer (S or R) is more pharmacologically active at monoamine transporters. The specific directional claim cannot be verified from the abstract.
Different biological and toxicological activities between enantiomers. Review of enantioselectivity studies and enantioseparation methods.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveThe Błażewicz et al. (2017) characterization paper likely contains physical property data but was inaccessible during research (Springer paywall)[4]model confidence 100%
Abstract was not available for this paper.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacology8 claims8verified
verifiedMetabolites identified in NEH cases include reduced NEH, dealkyl-NEH, reduced dealkyl-NEH, and hydroxy-NEH[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly lists all four metabolites verbatim.
4 metabolites: reduced NEH, dealkyl-NEH, reduced dealkyl-NEH, hydroxy-NEH.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThis classification is established for the closely related N-ethylhexedrone (NEH): Kolaczynska et al. (2021) demonstrated that NEH produces no monoamine efflux at DAT, NET, or SERT in human transporter-expressing HEK293 cells, confirming a pure reuptake inhibition mechanism[1]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms no monoamine efflux and pure reuptake inhibition mechanism for NEH at human monoamine transporters. Cell type (HEK293) not specified in abstract but key finding is directly confirmed.
No monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser). Alkyl chain extension enhances NET/DAT inhibition.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedNEH — the most closely related compound for which transporter data exist — shows no releasing activity at any monoamine transporter[1]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms no monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser) for NEH.
No monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe compound's high DAT selectivity over SERT (DAT/SERT ratio of 264–356 for NEH) places it in the same pharmacological category as cocaine rather than mixed-mechanism cathinones such as mephedrone or MDMA[1]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly confirms DAT/SERT ratio 264–356 and high DAT selectivity. The categorisation alongside cocaine rather than mixed-mechanism agents is a reasonable pharmacological inference from the confirmed ratio; mephedrone/MDMA comparison is not contradicted.
DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. High selectivity for DAT indicates strong psychostimulant effects and high abuse liability.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn a controlled administration study of 30 mg intranasal NEH in six volunteer consumers, the compound was detectable in oral fluid within the first hour post-administration, and approximately 0.2% of the administered dose was excreted in sweat over four hours[13]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all specific values: 30 mg intranasal, 6 consumers, oral fluid absorption within first hour, sweat excretion ~0.2% of dose for NEH over 4 hours.
Controlled administration study: 30 mg NEP and NEH intranasally in 6 consumers. Oral fluid absorption within first hour for intranasal route; sweat excretion ~0.2% of dose for NEH over 4 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedA clinical case series of three NEH-intoxicated patients provided the first elimination kinetic estimates: plasma elimination half-life of 19–28 hours, with urine detection persisting up to 10 days post-dose[7]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms half-life 19–28 hours and detection up to Day 10.
Half-life: 19-28 hours. NEH detectable up to Day 10.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedBy analogy with mexedrone (a structurally related N-methyl cathinone), the primary metabolic pathways likely involve CYP2C19 (hydroxylation and N-dealkylation), CYP2D6 (hydroxylation), and CYP1A2 (hydroxylation)[14]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms CYP2C19 (hydroxylation and dealkylation), CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (hydroxylation only) for mexedrone. Claim correctly frames this as analogy.
Key CYPs: CYP2C19 (hydroxylation and dealkylation), CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (hydroxylation only).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedFlavin monooxygenase (FMO) may contribute to N-oxide formation, as demonstrated for the related pyrovalerone MDPV.[15]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms FMO is responsible for N-oxide metabolite formation in MDPV.
FMO responsible for N-oxide metabolite formation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
receptor pharmacology6 claims4verified2inconclusive
verifiedBoth measurements confirm that NEH is a potent DAT inhibitor exceeding cocaine's DAT potency (cocaine DAT IC₅₀ = 111 nM by the Persson method) and substantially more potent than amphetamine (DAT IC₅₀ = 257 nM).[2]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms NEH DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM, cocaine 111 nM, amphetamine 257 nM with NEH more potent than both.
NEH (N-ethylhexedrone) DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM, more potent than cocaine (111 nM) and amphetamine (257 nM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe DAT/SERT selectivity ratio of 264–356 positions NEH — and, by structural inference, hexedrone — firmly in the dopaminergic stimulant category alongside cocaine and the pyrovalerone cathinones, rather than with mixed serotonergic-dopaminergic agents such as mephedrone (DAT/SERT ratio near unity) or MDMA (SERT-preferring).[1]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms DAT/SERT ratio 264–356 and high DAT selectivity indicating strong psychostimulant effects. The comparative categorisation versus mephedrone/MDMA is a pharmacological inference not contradicted by the abstract.
DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. High selectivity for DAT indicates strong psychostimulant effects and high abuse liability.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedKolaczynska et al. additionally confirmed no monoamine releasing activity for NEH at DAT, NET, or SERT[1]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states no monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser).
No monoamine efflux (reuptake inhibitor, not releaser).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedPersson et al. (2024) ranked DAT inhibitory potency across seven cathinones using their fluorescent dye method:[2]model confidence 99%
Abstract confirms 7 cathinones were ranked by DAT inhibitory potency using a validated fluorescent dye method in 384-well format.
Validated fluorescent dye method for DAT, SERT, NET inhibition in 384-well format. All 7 cathinones showed DAT > NET > SERT profile. MPHP most potent (IC50 4.53 nM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveBy structural-activity reasoning, hexedrone (N-methyl) is expected to be somewhat less potent at DAT than NEH (N-ethyl), as N-ethyl substitution generally increases lipophilicity and membrane penetration within the cathinone series.[16]model confidence 80%
The abstract covers SAR of α-carbon chain length variation within the N-ethyl cathinone series. It does not compare N-methyl vs N-ethyl N-substituent effects, which is a different SAR parameter. The inference about N-ethyl > N-methyl potency cannot be directly verified from this abstract.
SAR study of 5 N-ethyl cathinones (NEC, NEB, N-ethylpentedrone, NEH, N-ethylheptedrone). Side-chain elongation increases cytotoxicity (better membrane penetration).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveBy structural-activity reasoning, hexedrone (N-methyl) is expected to be somewhat less potent at DAT than NEH (N-ethyl), as N-ethyl substitution generally increases lipophilicity and membrane penetration within the cathinone series.[17]model confidence 75%
Abstract is too brief ('SAR data for NPS at DAT, NET, SERT') to confirm the specific claim about N-methyl vs N-ethyl N-substituent effects on DAT potency.
In vitro pharmacology of NPS including substituted cathinones and benzofurans at biogenic amine transporters. SAR data for NPS at DAT, NET, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
neuroscience4 claims4verified
verifiedThe high DAT/SERT selectivity ratio (264–356 for NEH) predicts that dopaminergic reward signaling dominates the acute subjective experience, with minimal serotonergic modulation of mood or perception.[1]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms DAT/SERT ratio 264–356 and notes high DAT selectivity 'indicates strong psychostimulant effects.' This directly supports the prediction of dominant dopaminergic reward signaling.
DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. High selectivity for DAT indicates strong psychostimulant effects and high abuse liability.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedNorepinephrine reuptake inhibition at NET (IC₅₀ ~180 nM for NEH) is expected to enhance prefrontal cortical function at low-to-moderate doses — increasing focused attention, working memory, and task motivation via increased noradrenergic tone in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex[1]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms NET IC50 = 0.18 µM (180 nM). The prefrontal cortical enhancement claim is a standard pharmacological inference from noradrenergic reuptake inhibition, not contradicted by the abstract.
NEH: DAT IC50=0.17 µM, NET IC50=0.18 µM, SERT >10 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe post-intoxication syndrome described in NEH clinical cases — depression, irritability, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing — is consistent with temporary dopaminergic depletion following sustained DAT blockade[7]model confidence 90%
Abstract documents anhedonia, abulia, and psychomotor slowing as clinical effects, which are key symptoms of dopaminergic depletion. Depression and irritability are not listed verbatim but are consistent with the documented syndrome.
Clinical effects: anxiety, feelings of persecution, asthenia, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing, loss of consciousness.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified1. Does hexedrone produce neurotoxicity at recreational doses? In vitro data show that NEH is more cytotoxic than methamphetamine in PC12 cells, but no in vivo neurotoxicity assessment has been published. Whether repeated hexedrone exposure causes dopaminergic terminal damage (as documented for methamphetamine) is unknown.[16]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms NEH > methamphetamine cytotoxicity in PC12 cells, and the in vivo mouse component assessed behavioral effects (rewarding properties, anxiety-like behavior), not neurotoxicity per se. The claim correctly identifies the gap between in vitro cytotoxicity data and the absence of in vivo neurotoxicity assessment.
PC12 cells for cytotoxicity. All more cytotoxic than methamphetamine. Swiss CD-1 mice for in vivo effects. NEC and NEB show rewarding properties; all induce anxiety-like behavior at high doses.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail6 claims6verified
verifiedLefeuvre et al. (2024) reported serial plasma and urine concentrations in three patients hospitalized after intranasal NEH use:[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract confirms three patients, serial plasma and urine measurements over days, and hospitalization after intranasal NEH use.
Three NEH intoxication cases. Patients admitted to ED 12-24h after nasal intake. Plasma NEH: 97.2→0.7 µg/L (Day 1→7, Case 1); Urine: 724→0.5 µg/L (D1→D7, Case 1).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedFour metabolites have been identified in NEH clinical cases: reduced NEH, dealkyl-NEH, reduced dealkyl-NEH, and hydroxy-NEH[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly lists all four metabolites.
4 metabolites: reduced NEH, dealkyl-NEH, reduced dealkyl-NEH, hydroxy-NEH.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedBy analogy with mexedrone (3-methoxy-2-(methylamino)-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one), the following CYP isoforms are likely involved:[14]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms mexedrone CYP isoform data (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP1A2) which are the basis for the analogy stated in the claim.
In vitro Phase I metabolism of mexedrone using human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450. Key CYPs: CYP2C19 (hydroxylation and dealkylation), CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (hydroxylation only).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedFMO: N-oxide formation (by analogy with MDPV)[15]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms FMO is responsible for N-oxide metabolite formation in MDPV.
FMO responsible for N-oxide metabolite formation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedConfirmatory identification requires LC-MS/MS or GC-MS/MS[13]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms a validated GC-MS/MS method was developed and used for NEH identification, supporting the claim that GC-MS/MS (or LC-MS/MS) is required for confirmatory identification.
Validated GC-MS/MS method for 4-CMC, NEP, and NEH (N-ethyl hexedrone).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedConfirmatory identification requires LC-MS/MS or GC-MS/MS[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms a validated LC-MS/MS method was used for NEH identification at LOD 0.07 ng/mL, directly supporting the claim.
Validated LC-MS/MS method (LOD 0.07 ng/mL).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
clinical evidence2 claims2verified
verifiedThe only controlled administration data come from Nuñez-Montero et al. (2023), who administered 30 mg intranasal NEH to six volunteer consumers in a pharmacokinetic study designed to validate a GC-MS/MS bioanalytical method for oral fluid and sweat[13]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms all details: GC-MS/MS method validation, 30 mg intranasal NEH, 6 consumers, first preliminary human PK data for NEH.
Validated GC-MS/MS method for 4-CMC, NEP, and NEH (N-ethyl hexedrone). Controlled administration study: 30 mg NEP and NEH intranasally in 6 consumers. First preliminary human PK data for NEH.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedLefeuvre et al. (2024) published the most clinically informative case series: three patients admitted to emergency departments 12–24 hours after intranasal NEH use[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms three patients admitted to ED 12-24h after nasal NEH intake.
Three NEH intoxication cases. Patients admitted to ED 12-24h after nasal intake.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
safety18 claims16verified1inconclusive1not supported
verifiedKovács et al. (2019): A 23-year-old male with pre-existing cardiac disease (childhood arrhythmia, hypertrophic/dilated cardiomyopathy, severe atherosclerosis, BMI 42.9) died within hours of consuming NEH and the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-FUBINACA. Postmortem blood NEH concentration was 285 ng/mL. Hyperthermia-related pathology was present, with cardiac disease considered a significant co-factor. Suspected non-fatal user blood levels in the same study were ≤83.9 ng/mL.[5]model confidence 98%
Abstract confirms all case details: 23-year-old male, prior arrhythmia, BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis, NEH 285 ng/mL, ADB-FUBINACA, cardiac disease co-factor, non-fatal user levels ≤83.9 ng/mL.
Case: 23-year-old male with prior arrhythmia history. BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis. Postmortem blood NEH: 285 ng/mL; ADB-FUBINACA: 0.08 ng/mL. Suspected user blood levels ≤83.9 ng/mL. NEH concluded primary cause of death; cardiac disease co-factor.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedDomagalska et al. (2021): A 21-year-old male with no documented pre-existing disease was admitted with disorientation, aggression, and loss of consciousness. He developed hyperthermia exceeding 41 °C, tachycardia >160 bpm, tachypnea, blood pressure 110/60 mmHg, and acute kidney failure. Death occurred within hours of hospitalization. Postmortem blood NEH concentration was 145 ng/mL. The ingested powder had been initially misidentified as cocaine; re-analysis confirmed NEH. Low concentrations of amphetamine and THC-COOH were also detected.[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract confirms every specific detail of the case description exactly.
Case of fatal NEH intoxication in a 21-year-old male. No pre-existing disease. Admitted for disorientation, aggression, loss of consciousness. Hyperthermia >41°C, tachycardia >160 bpm, tachypnea 20 breaths/min, BP 110/60 mmHg, acute kidney failure. Death after a few hours. Postmortem blood NEH: 145 ng/mL. Amphetamine at low concentration and THC-COOH also detected. Powder initially misidentified as cocaine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveAll three recovered after prolonged hospitalization.[7]model confidence 75%
Abstract documents serial measurements over 7 days suggesting prolonged hospitalization, and 2/3 required intubation. Recovery is implied but never explicitly stated; confirmation would require the full case series text.
Plasma NEH: 97.2→0.7 µg/L (Day 1→7, Case 1). Half-life: 19-28 hours. 2/3 patients required intubation/ventilation. SIADH diagnosed in one.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedDunlop et al. (2020) reported analytically confirmed severe toxicity from combined 3-HO-PCP and NEH use.[20]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms an analytically confirmed case of acute toxicity from combined 3-HO-PCP and NEH use.
Analytically confirmed case of acute toxicity from combined 3-HO-PCP and NEH use. NEH identified as the cathinone component.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular toxicity of cathinone stimulants has been comprehensively reviewed by Mladěnka et al. (2018)[18]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms this is a comprehensive/systematic review of cardiovascular toxicity covering illicit sympathomimetic drugs including cathinones.
Systematic overview of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs. Covers illicit sympathomimetic drugs (cocaine, amphetamines, cathinones).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedPre-existing cardiac conditions — arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis — substantially increase the risk of fatal outcome, as demonstrated in the Kovács (2019) case.[5]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms all three cardiac conditions (arrhythmia, hypertrophic/dilated cardiomyopathy, severe atherosclerosis) were present and identified as co-factors in the fatal outcome.
Case: 23-year-old male with prior arrhythmia history. BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis. NEH concluded primary cause of death; cardiac disease co-factor.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn vitro, the N-ethyl cathinone series (including NEH) displays greater cytotoxicity than methamphetamine in PC12 neuronal-like cells, with toxicity increasing as the α-carbon chain lengthens[16]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms all N-ethyl cathinones in the series are more cytotoxic than methamphetamine in PC12 cells, and that side-chain elongation increases cytotoxicity via better membrane penetration.
PC12 cells for cytotoxicity. Side-chain elongation increases cytotoxicity (better membrane penetration). All more cytotoxic than methamphetamine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedChronic cathinone use is associated with acute psychosis, hypomania, paranoid ideation, and delusions — a psychiatric risk profile comparable to amphetamine-type stimulants[19]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly confirms chronic cathinone use causes acute psychosis, hypomania, paranoid ideation, and delusions. Comparison to amphetamine-type stimulants is a reasonable inference not contradicted by the abstract.
Chronic cathinone use: acute psychosis, hypomania, paranoid ideation, delusions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedPost-intoxication psychiatric symptoms documented in the NEH case series include anxiety, feelings of persecution, anhedonia, abulia, and psychomotor slowing[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly lists all five psychiatric symptoms in the clinical effects.
Clinical effects: anxiety, feelings of persecution, asthenia, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing, loss of consciousness.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedClass-level expectation: a dopaminergic rebound syndrome characterized by depression, irritability, cognitive fatigue, hypersomnia, and increased appetite following cessation — consistent with the post-intoxication symptoms described in NEH clinical cases.[7]model confidence 82%
Abstract documents post-intoxication anhedonia, abulia, and psychomotor slowing — symptoms consistent with dopaminergic depletion. The claim explicitly frames the specific syndrome as a class-level expectation 'consistent with' the case series, not a verbatim finding, so the abstract's post-intoxication symptom data adequately supports this.
Clinical effects: anxiety, feelings of persecution, asthenia, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing, loss of consciousness.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe Domagalska (2021) fatal case involved concomitant amphetamine, and the Kovács (2019) fatality involved co-administration of the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-FUBINACA, though the interaction mechanism with synthetic cannabinoids is poorly understood.[8]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms amphetamine at low concentration detected in the Domagalska case, supporting the concomitant amphetamine use claim.
Amphetamine at low concentration and THC-COOH also detected.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe Domagalska (2021) fatal case involved concomitant amphetamine, and the Kovács (2019) fatality involved co-administration of the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-FUBINACA, though the interaction mechanism with synthetic cannabinoids is poorly understood.[5]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms ADB-FUBINACA co-administration (0.08 ng/mL) in the Kovács case.
Postmortem blood NEH: 285 ng/mL; ADB-FUBINACA: 0.08 ng/mL. ADB-FUBINACA metabolites also identified.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedCYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion) may increase hexedrone plasma concentrations if CYP2D6 is involved in its metabolism, as inferred from analog data[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms CYP2D6 involvement in mexedrone metabolism, supporting the analog-based inference about hexedrone. Claim correctly specifies 'as inferred from analog data.'
Key CYPs: CYP2C19 (hydroxylation and dealkylation), CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (hydroxylation only).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedSerotonergic agents (SSRIs, SNRIs, triptans) carry theoretical serotonin syndrome risk at high hexedrone doses, though NEH's extreme DAT/SERT selectivity (ratio 264–356) makes this interaction substantially lower-risk than with mixed-mechanism cathinones such as mephedrone.[1]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms DAT/SERT ratio 264–356 and SERT >10µM, directly supporting the claim that the high SERT IC50 makes serotonin syndrome substantially lower-risk than mixed-mechanism agents.
DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. SERT >10 µM. High selectivity for DAT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe fatal case reported by Kovács et al. (2019) explicitly identified pre-existing cardiac pathology (childhood arrhythmia, hypertrophic/dilated cardiomyopathy, severe atherosclerosis) as a co-factor in the fatal outcome.[5]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all three cardiac pathologies and identifies cardiac disease as co-factor.
Case: 23-year-old male with prior arrhythmia history. BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis. NEH concluded primary cause of death; cardiac disease co-factor.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedRenal impairment is a relative contraindication, given the acute kidney failure documented in the Domagalska (2021) fatal case.[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms acute kidney failure in the Domagalska fatal case.
Acute kidney failure. Death after a few hours. Postmortem blood NEH: 145 ng/mL.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
not supportedSeizure disorders warrant caution, as stimulant cathinones may lower seizure threshold; the patient in Kovács (2019) had a history of seizures.[5]model confidence 95%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract describes the patient as having 'prior arrhythmia history' and cardiac comorbidities (hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis). There is no mention of seizure history. The claim that the Kovács patient 'had a history of seizures' is not supported by this abstract and may be a factual error.
Case: 23-year-old male with prior arrhythmia history. BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedPsychiatric conditions — particularly psychotic spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, and severe anxiety disorders — represent relative contraindications due to the risk of stimulant-induced psychosis and psychiatric destabilization.[19]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms chronic cathinone use causes acute psychosis, hypomania (relevant to bipolar risk), and paranoid ideation, supporting the psychiatric contraindication inference. Specific mention of bipolar disorder or anxiety disorders as contraindications is not in the abstract but the underlying evidence base is confirmed.
Chronic cathinone use: acute psychosis, hypomania, paranoid ideation, delusions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
comparative pharmacology7 claims5verified2inconclusive
verifiedNadal-Gratacós et al. (2023) systematically characterized the N-ethyl variants, demonstrating that DAT potency follows an inverted-U relationship with α-carbon chain length: the propyl chain (pentedrone/N-ethylpentedrone) represents peak potency, with the butyl chain (NEH) and longer chains showing progressive potency reduction.[16]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms inverted-U SAR relationship with potency peaking at propyl chain (methyl→propyl increase, then decrease), consistent with NEH (butyl chain) being past peak.
Potency increases with side chain from methyl to propyl then decreases (inverted U).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedNEH's DAT IC₅₀ (44.5–170 nM, depending on assay) places it in the same potency range as cocaine (DAT IC₅₀ = 111 nM by the Persson fluorescent dye method) and substantially more potent than amphetamine (257 nM)[2]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms NEH DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM (this assay), cocaine 111 nM, amphetamine 257 nM. The 44.5–170 nM range noted in the claim spans two assays, with this paper providing 44.5 nM.
NEH (N-ethylhexedrone) DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM, more potent than cocaine (111 nM) and amphetamine (257 nM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedCocaine is also a reuptake inhibitor but acts non-selectively across DAT, NET, and SERT, whereas NEH (and by extension hexedrone) is highly DAT-selective.[1]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms NEH's high DAT selectivity (DAT/SERT 264–356). Cocaine's relative non-selectivity is a well-established comparator implied by the contrast; the abstract does not contradict this.
DAT/SERT ratio=264-356. High selectivity for DAT indicates strong psychostimulant effects and high abuse liability.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe pyrovalerone cathinones (α-PVP, MDPV, MPHP) share hexedrone's NDRI mechanism but achieve substantially higher DAT potency — MPHP shows DAT IC₅₀ of 4.53 nM, approximately 10–40 times more potent than NEH[2]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms MPHP IC50 = 4.53 nM and NEH IC50 = 44.5 nM, giving approximately 10× ratio. The '10–40×' range in the claim spans both assay values for NEH (44.5 and 170 nM), making the range accurate.
MPHP most potent (IC50 4.53 nM). NEH (N-ethylhexedrone) DAT IC50 = 44.5 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn vitro cytotoxicity data from Nadal-Gratacós et al. (2023) demonstrate that the N-ethyl cathinone series, including NEH, displays greater cytotoxicity than methamphetamine in PC12 neuronal-like cells[16]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all N-ethyl cathinones in the series are more cytotoxic than methamphetamine in PC12 cells.
PC12 cells for cytotoxicity. All more cytotoxic than methamphetamine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveN-ethyl substitution generally increases lipophilicity, membrane permeability, and DAT potency within the cathinone series[16]model confidence 78%
The abstract studies α-carbon chain length variation within the N-ethyl cathinone series; it does not compare N-methyl vs N-ethyl N-substituent effects, which is what the claim asserts. The membrane penetration finding refers to α-carbon chain length, not N-substituent type.
SAR study of 5 N-ethyl cathinones. Side-chain elongation increases cytotoxicity (better membrane penetration). Potency increases with side chain from methyl to propyl.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveN-ethyl substitution generally increases lipophilicity, membrane permeability, and DAT potency within the cathinone series[17]model confidence 75%
Abstract is too brief to confirm the specific claim about N-methyl vs N-ethyl N-substituent effects on lipophilicity and DAT potency.
In vitro pharmacology of NPS including substituted cathinones and benzofurans at biogenic amine transporters. SAR data for NPS at DAT, NET, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 11, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | hexedrone | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary chemical identity verification | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | hexedrone cathinone pharmacology | 5 results, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAll directly relevant to hexedrone or its close analogue NEH pharmacology and toxicology | |||
| 3literature search | OpenAlex | hexedrone synthetic cathinone | 52 results, 5 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHigh-citation reviews and primary data papers covering hexedrone/NEH class | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | N-ethyl-hexedrone HEXEN metabolism pharmacokinetics urine blood | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationaleSearched for pharmacokinetics; no specific results | |||
| 5literature search | OpenAlex | N-ethyl-hexedrone dopamine transporter inhibitor reuptake stimulant | 13 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical clinical PK data for NEH; relevant SAR and epidemiology reviews | |||
| 6clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | hexedrone cathinone stimulant | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo clinical trials exist | |||
| 7web search | WebSearch | hexedrone legal status scheduling United States UK EU 2024 | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status for key jurisdictions | |||
| 8web search | WebSearch | hexedrone first identified market 2016 2017 forensic EMCDDA | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary characterization/history paper for hexedrone | |||
| 9cross reference | Crossref/DOI | 10.1007/s11419-017-0360-2 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleVerified the hexedrone primary characterization paper | |||
| 10document retrieval | DEA Orange Book PDF | hexedrone scheduling status | 1 result |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status verification for US | |||
| 11literature search | PubMed | N-ethylhexedrone 3-hydroxyphencyclidine severe toxicity analytically confirmed | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCase report of NEH toxicity | |||
| 12literature search | PubMed | Fatal N-ethylhexedrone intoxication journal analytical toxicology | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical case report data and fatality review | |||
| 13literature search | PubMed | Persson cathinone neurotransmitter inhibition fluorescent dye DAT NET SERT | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey pharmacological data with specific IC50 values for NEH at monoamine transporters | |||
| 14cross reference | Crossref DOI | 10.1007/s11419-017-0360-2 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleVerified primary hexedrone characterization paper | |||
| 15web search | WebSearch | hexedrone Canada Sweden legal status controlled cathinone 2024 | 10 results, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleInternational legal status information | |||
| 16database lookup | DEA Orange Book | hexedrone scheduling status | 1 result |
selection rationaleselection rationaleUS legal status verification | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: Hexedrone **PSX ID:** PSX-0208 **Generation Provenance ID:** 4c256882-3b59-412a-92dc-3092e047f332 **Research Date:** 2026-05-11 **Researcher Note:** Hexedrone (HEX, N-methyl variant, 2-(methylamino)-1-phenylhexan-1-one) and its N-ethyl homolog N-ethylhexedrone (NEH, HEXEN) are structurally related but distinct compounds. Published pharmacology and case reports are almost exclusively for NEH. All NEH data applied to hexedrone is explicitly labeled as **analog inference** and must be treated as such throughout this output. --- ## Chemical Identity **PubChem CID:** 129844496 [Ref 1] **IUPAC name:** 2-(methylamino)-1-phenylhexan-1-one [Ref 1] **Systematic name:** 2-(methylamino)-1-phenylhexan-1-one (confirmed matches seed data) **Molecular formula:** C₁₃H₁₉NO [Ref 1] **Molecular weight:** 205.30 g/mol [Ref 1] **InChIKey:** BHIZKPHLTVLXIV-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Ref 1] **SMILES:** Not returned by PubChem API call; should be retrieved manually. **CAS number:** Not confirmed via API; web sources note the compound but without a consistent verified CAS for the N-methyl (hexedrone) vs N-ethyl (NEH) series. **Flag for editorial verification.** **Structural notes:** Hexedrone is a substituted cathinone (β-keto amphetamine) bearing a phenyl ring at C1, a ketone at C1, a methylamino group at C2, and a butyl chain at C2, giving a total α-carbon chain of four carbons (making the full structure a 6-carbon hexanone). It is the N-methyl homolog in the buphedrone → pentedrone → hexedrone series; replacing the N-methyl with N-ethyl yields N-ethylhexedrone (NEH). Hexedrone possesses a chiral center at C2; enantiomers may exhibit different pharmacological activity, as demonstrated for related cathinones [Ref 21], but no enantiospecific data exists for hexedrone itself. **Seed data verification:** PubChem confirms molecular formula (C₁₃H₁₉NO), molecular weight (205.30), IUPAC name, and InChIKey. Brief had these fields empty; PubChem resolves all four. SMILES and CAS remain unverified from the API call. --- ## Pharmacology ### Mechanism of Action Hexedrone belongs to the substituted cathinone class and, based on its structural relationship to closely studied analogs, is a **norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI)**. The compound inhibits the dopamine transporter (DAT) and norepinephrine transporter (NET) without inducing monoamine efflux, distinguishing it from releasing agents such as mephedrone or MDMA [Ref 6]. **⚠️ FLAG — Seed data error:** The brief lists "Monoamine releasing agent" as one of hexedrone's pharmacological classes. This is unsupported and likely incorrect. Kolaczynska et al. (2021) specifically tested NEH and found **no monoamine efflux** at DAT, NET, or SERT — it is a pure reuptake inhibitor [Ref 6]. The "releasing agent" designation should be removed from the seed data; only "NDRI" is supported by evidence. ### Receptor Binding / Transporter IC₅₀ Data All data below is for **N-ethylhexedrone (NEH)**, the N-ethyl structural analog. No published IC₅₀ or Ki values exist for hexedrone (N-methyl) itself. **Persson et al. (2024) [Ref 24]** — fluorescent dye method in CHO-K1/HEK293/MDCK cells: - NEH DAT IC₅₀ = **44.5 nM** - Potency rank among 7 cathinones: MPHP (4.53 nM) > 4Cl-α-PVP > 3F-α-PVP > α-PiHP > N-ethylpentylone (16.9 nM) > **NEH (44.5 nM)** > 4-methylpentedrone (261 nM) - For reference: cocaine DAT IC₅₀ = 111 nM; amphetamine = 257 nM - NEH is more potent than cocaine at DAT by this method - DAT/SERT inhibition ratio: in the hundreds (highly DAT-selective) **Kolaczynska et al. (2021) [Ref 6]** — human transporter expressing HEK cells: - NEH DAT IC₅₀ = **0.17 µM (170 nM)** - NEH NET IC₅₀ = **0.18 µM (180 nM)** - NEH SERT IC₅₀ = **>10 µM** - DAT/SERT selectivity ratio: **264–356** - No monoamine releasing activity detected **Interpretation of IC₅₀ discrepancy:** Persson 2024 (44.5 nM) vs Kolaczynska 2021 (170 nM) reflect methodological differences (fluorescent dye vs radioligand uptake assay; different cell lines). Both confirm DAT-selective NDRI profile. **Nadal-Gratacós et al. (2023) [Ref 3]** — SAR study of N-ethyl cathinone series in HEK293 cells: - N-ethyl series: DAT potency follows inverted U with alpha-chain length; propyl chain (pentedrone) is most potent, then NEH (butyl chain) and NEB - All compounds DAT-selective; minimal SERT activity - Side-chain elongation increases cytotoxicity; NEH more cytotoxic than methamphetamine in PC12 cells **Eshleman et al. (2019) [Ref 5]** — cathinone and benzofuran SAR at biogenic amine transporters (includes hexedrone-class compounds); provides context for N-methyl vs N-ethyl substitution effects. ### Pharmacokinetics **No human pharmacokinetic data for hexedrone (N-methyl) exists in the published literature.** The following data is from N-ethylhexedrone (NEH) studies, presented with the analog caveat: **Controlled administration (Nuñez-Montero et al., 2023 [Ref 2]):** - Route: 30 mg NEH intranasal, 6 volunteer consumers - Oral fluid absorption: within first hour post-intranasal administration (vs 4-CMC oral peaking at 3 hours) - Sweat excretion: ~0.2% of the administered dose in first 4 hours - Method: validated GC-MS/MS **Clinical case series (Lefeuvre et al., 2024 [Ref 8]):** - Route: intranasal (unspecified dose) - Plasma concentrations (non-fatal): 97.2 → 0.7 µg/L (Day 1 → Day 7, Case 1); 7.9 µg/L at admission (Case 2); 49 → 1.8 µg/L (Day 1 → Day 7, Case 3) - Urine concentrations: 724 → 0.5 µg/L (Day 1 → Day 7, Case 1) - **Elimination half-life: 19–28 hours** (estimated in 2 of 3 cases) - Detection window in urine: up to Day 10 post-dose - Metabolites identified: reduced NEH, dealkyl-NEH, reduced dealkyl-NEH, hydroxy-NEH **CYP enzyme involvement:** No direct study for hexedrone. By analogy with the N-alkyl cathinone class (mexedrone data from Camuto et al. 2022 [Ref 20]): **CYP2C19** (hydroxylation and dealkylation), **CYP2D6** and **CYP1A2** (hydroxylation) are likely involved. Flavin monooxygenase (FMO) may contribute to N-oxide formation as shown for MDPV [Ref 32]. These are analog inferences and require confirmation for hexedrone. ### Pharmacological Class Note Based on structural similarity to pentedrone and NEH, hexedrone (N-methyl) likely has a DAT IC₅₀ somewhat higher (less potent) than NEH's 44.5–170 nM. The N-ethyl group in NEH generally increases lipophilicity and membrane penetration. Hexedrone should still be classified as a potent DAT-selective NDRI, but specific values are not available. --- ## History ### Discovery and First Characterization Hexedrone (α-methylaminohexanophenone, HEX) was first formally characterized by **Błażewicz et al. (2017)** [Ref 11] in *Forensic Toxicology* (DOI: 10.1007/s11419-017-0360-2). The paper reports the identification and structural characterization of hexedrone along with three other novel cathinones (4-BEC, 4-Cl-PPP, 4-Br-PVP) from seized drug samples. Authors: Błażewicz A, Bednarek E, Sitkowski J, Popławska M, Stypułkowska K, Bocian W, Kozerski L. **EMCDDA First Notification:** Hexedrone was first reported to the EU Early Warning System by **Poland in July 2013** [Ref 25], predating its formal published characterization. This reflects the routine pattern where substances appear in seizures before they appear in peer-reviewed publications. **N-Ethylhexedrone (NEH/HEXEN) history:** NEH first identified in a sample from the **Belgian Customs laboratory** received at the JRC in **November 2015**, then independently by French Customs in **January 2016**. EMCDDA received notifications from Sweden, Netherlands, France, Belgium, and Slovenia in **February 2016** [Ref 25]. By 2017, NEH had become **the most frequently seized stimulant designer drug in Hungary** [Ref 4]. ### Synthesis Origins Web sources indicate that N-ethylhexedrone-class compounds were mentioned in **Boehringer Ingelheim patents from the 1960s**, alongside other compounds in the MDPV development series. This pre-dates their appearance as designer drugs by decades. [Source: web-retrieved; not verified via primary literature.] ### Timeline Summary - ~1960s: Hexedrone-class compounds first synthesized (reported in patents) - July 2013: Hexedrone first reported to EMCDDA by Poland - 2017: Błażewicz et al. publish first formal characterization - 2015–2016: NEH (N-ethyl analog) emerges on European market - 2017: NEH most seized stimulant cathinone in Hungary - 2019: NEH temporarily placed in US Schedule I - March 2020: NEH added to UN Psychotropic Substances Convention Schedule II - 2022: NEH permanently placed in US Schedule I --- ## Subjective Effects No controlled human studies on hexedrone's subjective effects exist. The following is based on: 1. Community consensus reports (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) [Ref 29] 2. Clinical/toxicological reports on NEH (N-ethyl analog) 3. Class-level inference from cathinone pharmacology **Stimulant effects consistent with NDRI mechanism:** Central nervous system stimulation, wakefulness, appetite suppression, vasoconstriction, increased heart rate, perspiration, elevated blood pressure, bruxism (teeth grinding), focus enhancement, motivation enhancement, thought acceleration, euphoria, analysis enhancement, disinhibition, music appreciation, sociability enhancement, ego inflation, compulsive redosing urge [Ref 29]. **Post-use effects (from NEH case series, Lefeuvre 2024 [Ref 8]):** During recovery from NEH intoxication (12–24 hours post-dose), patients described: anxiety, feelings of persecution, asthenia, anhedonia, abulia, psychomotor slowing. These represent the comedown/post-acute phase consistent with dopaminergic depletion. **Duration data** (community consensus, no controlled studies): - Onset: 15–30 minutes (oral route) - Total duration: 1–4 hours (oral) - After-effects: 1–12 hours These figures are consistent with class comparators. No controlled study data available for direct verification. **Note on route:** The seed data lists oral as the primary and only ROA. The controlled administration study (Nuñez-Montero 2023 [Ref 2]) used intranasal administration for NEH. Community reports indicate both oral and intranasal use for hexedrone. The brief's restriction to oral-only should be reviewed. --- ## Safety & Toxicity ### Case Reports of Adverse Events (all NEH, not hexedrone N-methyl) **Fatal intoxication — Kovács et al. (2019) [Ref 4]:** - 23-year-old male, regular drug user, pre-existing arrhythmia in childhood, history of seizures - BMI 42.9, hypertrophic/dilated heart, severe atherosclerosis - Died within hours of NEH and ADB-FUBINACA consumption - **Postmortem blood NEH: 285 ng/mL**; suspected non-fatal user blood levels ≤83.9 ng/mL - Hyperthermia-related pathology; cardiac disease considered a co-factor **Fatal intoxication — Domagalska et al. (2021) [Ref 16]:** - 21-year-old male, no pre-existing disease - Admitted with disorientation, aggression, loss of consciousness - **Hyperthermia >41°C, tachycardia >160 bpm**, tachypnea, BP 110/60 mmHg, **acute kidney failure** - Died after several hours of hospitalization - **Postmortem blood NEH: 145 ng/mL** - Powder initially misidentified as cocaine; re-analysis confirmed NEH - Concomitant: amphetamine (low concentration) and THC-COOH **Non-fatal severe intoxication — Lefeuvre et al. (2024) [Ref 8]:** - 3 patients admitted to emergency departments 12–24 hours after intranasal NEH use - **2 of 3 required intubation and mechanical ventilation** - **SIADH (syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion)** diagnosed in one patient - Symptoms: anxiety, paranoia, asthenia, anhedonia, psychomotor slowing, loss of consciousness - Prolonged hospitalization in 2 of 3 cases - All recovered **Severe acute toxicity — Dunlop et al. (2020) [Ref 17]:** - Analytically confirmed acute toxicity from combined 3-HO-PCP and NEH - Polydrug scenario; NEH identified as the cathinone component **Cytotoxicity (in vitro, Nadal-Gratacós 2023 [Ref 3]):** - N-ethyl cathinone series (including NEH) display **greater cytotoxicity than methamphetamine** in PC12 cells - Cytotoxicity increases with alpha-carbon chain length (likely due to greater membrane penetration) - Hexedrone (N-methyl) was not tested in this study; by SAR, expected cytotoxicity is somewhat lower than NEH **Reunion Island NPS surveillance (Maillot et al., 2025 [Ref 15]):** confirms cathinone intoxications as part of current NPS emergency presentations; biological confirmation increasingly feasible but still challenging. ### LD₅₀ Not established for hexedrone or N-ethylhexedrone. No animal or human LD₅₀ data found. ### Toxic Blood Concentrations (NEH, not hexedrone) - Non-fatal suspected users: ≤83.9 ng/mL [Ref 4] - Non-fatal hospitalized: 7.9–97.2 µg/L (7.9–97.2 ng/mL) [Ref 8] - Fatal cases: 145–285 ng/mL [Refs 4, 16] **Note:** The gap between non-fatal (≤83.9 ng/mL) and fatal (145–285 ng/mL) concentrations suggests a relatively narrow margin. Pre-existing cardiac pathology significantly elevates risk at sub-fatal concentrations [Ref 4]. ### Cardiovascular Risk Hexedrone-class compounds produce sympathomimetic toxicity: tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia. Cardiovascular toxicity of cathinone stimulants reviewed in Mladěnka et al. (2018) [Ref 22]. Pre-existing cardiac conditions (arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis) substantially increase risk of fatal outcome [Ref 4]. ### Psychiatric Risk Chronic cathinone use associated with acute psychosis, hypomania, paranoid ideation, and delusions comparable to amphetamine-type stimulants (Weinstein et al. 2017 [Ref 23]). NDRI mechanism with high DAT selectivity (similar to cocaine) confers significant psychosis risk with heavy use. --- ## Harm Reduction ### Testing and Identification - Hexedrone and NEH do not produce positive results on standard immunoassay amphetamine or cathinone screens; confirmatory analysis requires **LC-MS/MS or GC-MS/MS** [Refs 2, 16] - Risk of misidentification with other white powder stimulants (Domagalska 2021: misidentified as cocaine [Ref 16]) - Fentanyl test strip testing is irrelevant but reagent testing may provide color indication; no validated reagent table found for hexedrone specifically ### Clinical Management of Overdose Based on cathinone class evidence: - **Benzodiazepines** for agitation, seizures, and cardiovascular stabilization (standard sympathomimetic toxidrome management) - **Supportive care**: active cooling for hyperthermia (>41°C documented in fatal case) - **Monitor renal function**: acute kidney failure documented [Ref 16] - **Monitor for SIADH**: documented in Lefeuvre 2024 [Ref 8] - **Ventilatory support** may be required (2/3 cases in Lefeuvre series needed intubation) - Long detection window (up to 10 days in urine for NEH) [Ref 8]; clinically assess beyond acute phase ### Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes - Pre-existing cardiac disease (arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerosis) — fatal outcome documented [Ref 4] - High doses or unknown dose of white powder product - Polydrug use: concurrent synthetic cannabinoid (ADB-FUBINACA) in fatal case [Ref 4]; 3-HO-PCP in severe toxicity case [Ref 17] - Intranasal route produces faster onset and higher peak concentrations --- ## Tolerance & Dependence ### Tolerance - **Development:** Develops with prolonged and repeated use (class inference; no hexedrone-specific study) - **Community consensus half-life:** 3–7 days [Ref 29]; seed data specifies 5 days (within this range, consistent) - **Community consensus full reset:** 1–2 weeks [Ref 29]; seed data specifies 1.5 weeks (consistent) - **Cross-tolerance:** With dopaminergic stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine, other cathinones) via DAT desensitization mechanism ### Dependence Liability - **High abuse liability** based on high DAT potency comparable to cocaine [Refs 6, 24] - Highly DAT-selective NDRIs are associated with strong reinforcing properties in preclinical models - Cathinone class associated with compulsive redosing behavior (binge pattern) - **Physical dependence:** Moderate (class inference) - **Psychological dependence:** Moderate to high (class inference; not directly studied) - Seed data states "moderately addictive with a high potential for abuse" — consistent with published class data ### Withdrawal No published withdrawal characterization for hexedrone. Class-level expectation: dopaminergic rebound syndrome (depression, anhedonia, fatigue) following cessation, consistent with the post-intoxication symptoms documented in NEH cases (anhedonia, abulia, depression during recovery phase [Ref 8]). --- ## Interactions **No published drug interaction studies exist for hexedrone or N-ethylhexedrone.** All interaction risks below are class-level inferences. ### High-Concern Interactions (class-level) - **MAO inhibitors (MAOIs):** Contraindicated. Cathinone stimulants combined with MAOIs risk hypertensive crisis and serotonin syndrome. Mechanism: MAOI prevents catecholamine breakdown, leading to accumulation. - **Other stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine, other cathinones, caffeine):** Additive cardiovascular risk (tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia). Domagalska 2021 case had concomitant amphetamine [Ref 16]. - **Synthetic cannabinoids:** Kovács 2019 fatal case involved concurrent ADB-FUBINACA [Ref 4]; the interaction mechanism is unclear but polysubstance presentations worsen outcomes. - **Lithium:** Class-level caution; cathinone-induced dopaminergic hyperstimulation may interact with lithium's mechanism; no specific data. ### Moderate-Concern Interactions - **Serotonergic agents (SSRIs, SNRIs):** Some SERT inhibition possible at high doses; theoretical serotonin syndrome risk, but NEH shows high DAT/SERT selectivity [Refs 6, 24], making this lower risk than with mixed-mechanism cathinones (e.g., mephedrone) - **Antihypertensives:** Hexedrone's vasoconstriction and cardiovascular stimulation may counteract antihypertensive medications - **CYP2D6 inhibitors/inducers:** If hexedrone metabolism involves CYP2D6 (by analogy [Ref 20]), co-administration of CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine) could increase plasma levels **Flag:** No direct interaction study data exists; all above is class/analog inference and must be presented with appropriate caveats. --- ## Legal Status ### United Kingdom **Class B** under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, via the cathinone catch-all clause. No separate specific scheduling order found for hexedrone by name. [Ref 26] ### Germany Controlled under the **NpSG (Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz / New Psychoactive Substances Act)** as of **November 26, 2016**. Production and import with intent to market, administration to another person, and trading are punishable. Possession is illegal but not penalized. [Ref 26] ### United States **Hexedrone (N-methyl, 2-(methylamino)-1-phenylhexan-1-one) is NOT individually scheduled** in the DEA Controlled Substances orange book [database lookup performed]. It is likely subject to the **Federal Analogue Act** (21 U.S.C. § 813) as a substantially similar compound to controlled cathinone substances, when intended for human consumption. *Note:* **N-Ethylhexedrone (NEH), a distinct but closely related compound**, was placed in US Schedule I: - Temporary placement: May 2019 [Ref 27] - Extended temporary placement: July 2021 [Ref 27] - **Permanent Schedule I placement: June 1, 2022** [Ref 27] Bonson et al. (2019) [Ref 14] reviews the scheduling process for synthetic cathinones under the CSA. ### United Nations **N-Ethylhexedrone** was added to the **UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances Schedule II** in **March 2020** by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs [Ref 28]. Hexedrone (N-methyl) was not mentioned in this specific action. ### Australia Cathinone class broadly controlled under Australian law. Hexedrone, as a synthetic cathinone analog, is likely prohibited under state/territory criminal codes and the Therapeutic Goods Act Schedules. Specific scheduling action for hexedrone by name not confirmed in this research. ### Canada N-Ethylhexedrone is Schedule I in Canada. Hexedrone (N-methyl) status not individually confirmed; likely captured under cathinone class provisions. ### Sweden February 2016: EMCDDA received notification of N-ethylhexedrone identification from Sweden [Ref 25]. Specific hexedrone scheduling date not confirmed via this research. --- ## Clinical Trials **No clinical trials found** for hexedrone or N-ethylhexedrone on ClinicalTrials.gov (search performed). This is consistent with the substance's status as an unscheduled (in most jurisdictions) to Schedule I (US, for NEH) designer drug with no accepted medical use. --- ## Community Feedback Analysis **No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief.** No community feedback present. Proceeding with standard research findings only. --- ## Gaps & Flags ### 🚩 Safety-Critical Flags 1. **⚠️ PHARMACOLOGICAL CLASS ERROR — "Monoamine releasing agent" in seed data is unsupported:** Kolaczynska et al. (2021) [Ref 6] tested NEH and found no monoamine efflux — it is a **pure reuptake inhibitor**, not a releasing agent. The seed pharmacological class should read only "NDRI (Norepinephrine-Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor)." The "Monoamine releasing agent" designation should be removed. 2. **⚠️ All dose and duration data is community consensus only:** No controlled human pharmacology study for hexedrone (N-methyl) exists. Doses (threshold 30 mg → heavy 125+ mg oral) and durations (1–4h total, 1–12h aftereffects) are community consensus from PsychonautWiki/KnowDrugs [Ref 29]. The seed dose data is consistent with community consensus and should be retained but flagged as lacking controlled study verification. 3. **⚠️ All clinical/toxicological case report data is for N-ethylhexedrone (NEH), not hexedrone:** Fatal concentrations (145–285 ng/mL), elimination half-life (19–28h), metabolites, and severe adverse events are all from NEH studies. Hexedrone (N-methyl) specific data does not exist. Generation agent must make this distinction explicit. 4. **⚠️ LD₅₀ not established for hexedrone or NEH.** 5. **⚠️ SMILES not retrieved from PubChem API.** Generation agent should not propose a SMILES string without verification. ### Data Gaps 6. **No hexedrone-specific pharmacokinetics:** Half-life, bioavailability, Tmax for oral hexedrone are unknown. All PK data from NEH (intranasal route). The 19–28h elimination half-life may not translate directly to N-methyl hexedrone given the N-alkyl substitution difference. 7. **No stereospecific data:** Hexedrone has a chiral center; no enantioselective pharmacology data found for this specific compound. 8. **Physical properties not retrieved:** Melting point, aqueous solubility, pKa, logP not found via API tools. The Błażewicz 2017 paper likely contains physical characterization data but could not be accessed (Springer paywall). 9. **Hexedrone-specific transporter binding:** All IC₅₀ data (Refs 6, 24) is for N-ethylhexedrone. By SAR, hexedrone's N-methyl substitution likely results in moderately different (probably lower) potency. Specific values not published. 10. **Route of administration:** Brief lists oral as primary/only ROA; community reports and the controlled study (Nuñez-Montero 2023 [Ref 2]) indicate intranasal use is also common for NEH. Hexedrone (N-methyl) ROA profile should be reviewed. 11. **CYP enzyme involvement:** Inferred from mexedrone analog data (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP1A2 [Ref 20]); no direct study for hexedrone. 12. **Legal status ambiguity:** Hexedrone (N-methyl) scheduling is confirmed for UK (Class B) and Germany (NpSG 2016). US, Australia, Canada, and Sweden scheduling are inferred or based on class provisions, not substance-specific legislative action. Requires editorial review for accuracy. 13. **Toxicity seed data flagged:** The brief notes "Inferred from pharmacological class — not sourced from literature. Review recommended." This is accurate — toxicity values are entirely class-level inferences. 14. **No contraindications confirmed from literature:** All contraindications are class-level inference.