5-MeO-DALT
5-methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 8–12 mg | 8–12 mg | low |
| Common | 12–20 mg | 12–20 mg | low |
| Strong | 20–30 mg | 20–30 mg | low |
| Heavy | 35+ mg | 35+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Shulgin reported oral activity at 12–20 mg (cited in Cozzi 2016). Community dose tiers from PsychonautWiki provide the tier structure. The Dufayet (2022) case report confirms psychoactivity at ~10.7 mg oral. No controlled dose-response studies exist. Values are primarily community-derived. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin reported oral activity at 12–20 mg (cited in Cozzi 2016). Community dose tiers from PsychonautWiki provide the tier structure. The Dufayet (2022) case report confirms psychoactivity at ~10.7 mg oral. No controlled dose-response studies exist. Values are primarily community-derived. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
smokedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 3 mg | 3 mg | low |
| Low | 5–10 mg | 5–10 mg | low |
| Common | 10–20 mg | 10–20 mg | low |
| Strong | 20–30 mg | 20–30 mg | low |
| Heavy | 35+ mg | 35+ mg | low |
| Editorial | No published data on smoked doses. Community-derived values from PsychonautWiki. No case reports or controlled data exist for this route. Smoked bioavailability for tryptamines varies significantly with technique. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published data on smoked doses. Community-derived values from PsychonautWiki. No case reports or controlled data exist for this route. Smoked bioavailability for tryptamines varies significantly with technique. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 10–15 minutes | 10–15 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived onset time from PsychonautWiki, consistent with Shulgin's brief self-experiment descriptions. No controlled PK data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived onset time from PsychonautWiki, consistent with Shulgin's brief self-experiment descriptions. No controlled PK data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–20 minutes | 15–20 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 60–90 minutes | 60–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Shulgin reported 2–4 hour duration from self-experiments (cited in Cozzi 2016). Community data from PsychonautWiki confirms this range. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin reported 2–4 hour duration from self-experiments (cited in Cozzi 2016). Community data from PsychonautWiki confirms this range. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 1–3 hours | 1–3 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived. No published data on aftereffect duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived. No published data on aftereffect duration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
smoked
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. Values are in seconds (15–30 sec) but tool requires minutes; these represent sub-minute onset. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Values are in seconds (15–30 sec) but tool requires minutes; these represent sub-minute onset. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. Values are in seconds (15–30 sec) but represent sub-minute come-up. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Values are in seconds (15–30 sec) but represent sub-minute come-up. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1–5 minutes | 1–5 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 5–10 minutes | 5–10 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 15–20 minutes | 15–20 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. No controlled or case report data for smoked route. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. No controlled or case report data for smoked route. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 5–10 minutes | 5–10 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community-derived from PsychonautWiki. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity-derived from PsychonautWiki. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | low |
| Chronic | low | low | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological, renal | cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological, renal | low |
| Editorial | Classified as moderate acute toxicity based on four published case reports documenting serious adverse events (rhabdomyolysis, myoclonus, delirium) at recreational doses. No LD50 data exist, and the toxic dose is unknown. Chronic toxicity classified as low by structural analogy to other serotonergic tryptamines (no chronic toxicity data specific to 5-MeO-DALT); confidence is low due to complete absence of chronic exposure studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClassified as moderate acute toxicity based on four published case reports documenting serious adverse events (rhabdomyolysis, myoclonus, delirium) at recreational doses. No LD50 data exist, and the toxic dose is unknown. Chronic toxicity classified as low by structural analogy to other serotonergic tryptamines (no chronic toxicity data specific to 5-MeO-DALT); confidence is low due to complete absence of chronic exposure studies. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | WHO ECDD (2020) found no validated abuse liability data. Anecdotal reports do not suggest compulsive use. Negligible SERT and DAT binding, combined with rapid psychedelic tolerance, makes reinforcement unlikely. Consistent with class-level evidence for serotonergic psychedelics, which generally carry very low dependence liability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWHO ECDD (2020) found no validated abuse liability data. Anecdotal reports do not suggest compulsive use. Negligible SERT and DAT binding, combined with rapid psychedelic tolerance, makes reinforcement unlikely. Consistent with class-level evidence for serotonergic psychedelics, which generally carry very low dependence liability. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No evidence of withdrawal syndrome in published literature or anecdotal reports. Consistent with the serotonergic psychedelic class, which does not produce physical dependence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo evidence of withdrawal syndrome in published literature or anecdotal reports. Consistent with the serotonergic psychedelic class, which does not produce physical dependence. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | low |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | low |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT | low |
| Editorial | Tolerance mechanism inferred from class-level evidence (5-HT2A downregulation demonstrated for DOI/LSD in mice by De la Fuente Revenga 2022). WHO ECDD noted anecdotal tolerance reports. Specific half-life and reset values are community consensus for the psychedelic class, not substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance mechanism inferred from class-level evidence (5-HT2A downregulation demonstrated for DOI/LSD in mice by De la Fuente Revenga 2022). WHO ECDD noted anecdotal tolerance reports. Specific half-life and reset values are community consensus for the psychedelic class, not substance-specific data. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric bipolar disordertrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No substance-specific data. | |||
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. Case reports document acute psychosis/delirium. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. Case reports document acute psychosis/delirium. | |||
| cardiovascular cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Tachycardia documented in Jovel 2014 and Dufayet 2022 case reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTachycardia documented in Jovel 2014 and Dufayet 2022 case reports. | |||
| neurological epilepsytrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Thammongkolchai et al. (2015) documented cyclic myoclonus. Conference abstract quality evidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningThammongkolchai et al. (2015) documented cyclic myoclonus. Conference abstract quality evidence. | |||
| other concurrent MAOI usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level absolute contraindication for tryptamines. CYP metabolism confirmed by Michely 2015. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level absolute contraindication for tryptamines. CYP metabolism confirmed by Michely 2015. | |||
| other concurrent serotonergic medicationtrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Mechanistic inference from confirmed serotonin receptor agonism profile (Kozell 2023). | ||
ReasoningReasoningMechanistic inference from confirmed serotonin receptor agonism profile (Kozell 2023). | |||
| hepatic hepatic impairmenttrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | CYP metabolism confirmed by Michely 2015. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCYP metabolism confirmed by Michely 2015. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancytrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Standard absolute contraindication for psychoactive substances with no reproductive safety data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningStandard absolute contraindication for psychoactive substances with no reproductive safety data. | |||
Timeline Phases
smoked
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolutiontrace | 300–600 sec(i=0.20) | 300–600 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 300–600 sec(i=0.05) | 300–600 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | |||
| Onsettrace | 15–30 sec(i=0.10) | 15–30 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–30 sec(i=0.50) | 15–30 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | |||
| Peaktrace | 60–300 sec(i=1.00) | 60–300 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline based entirely on community reports (PsychonautWiki): onset 15\u201330 sec, come-up 15\u201330 sec, peak 1\u20135 min, offset 5\u201310 min, total 15\u201320 min. No case reports or controlled data exist for the smoked route. No published data on pyrolysis products. | |||
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 600–900 sec(i=0.05) | 600–900 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Oral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | |||
| Come uptrace | 900–1200 sec(i=0.30) | 900–1200 sec(i=0.30) | low |
| Editorial | Oral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | |||
| Peaktrace | 3600–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 3600–5400 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Oral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.25) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.25) | low |
| Editorial | Oral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.05) | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Oral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline anchored to Shulgin's reported 2\u20134 hour total duration (as cited in Cozzi 2016) and community duration data: onset 10\u201315 min, come-up 15\u201320 min, peak 60\u201390 min, offset 1\u20132 hr. These are primarily user-report-derived values with no controlled PK data to confirm. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses, effects are subtle and easily dismissed: a faint shift in mood toward positivity, slight heightening of sensory awareness, and a mild sense of physical activation. Visual perception is essentially unchanged. Pupil dilation may be noticeable to an observer. Physically, a light body stimulation and gentle warmth are the primary indicators. Wakefulness increases slightly. Cognitive effects are minimal — perhaps a faint increase in thought connectivity or novelty enhancement. The experience is short-lived, typically resolving within 1–2 hours.
No published threshold dose data for 5-MeO-DALT. Shulgin reported activity beginning at 12 mg oral. Community dose data (PsychonautWiki) provides tier ranges. Threshold inferred from community reports and structural analogy to other short-acting tryptamines.
ReasoningReasoning
No published threshold dose data for 5-MeO-DALT. Shulgin reported activity beginning at 12 mg oral. Community dose data (PsychonautWiki) provides tier ranges. Threshold inferred from community reports and structural analogy to other short-acting tryptamines.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At light doses, the experience takes recognizable psychedelic character but remains manageable. Emotional enhancement becomes noticeable — music sounds richer, colors appear slightly more saturated, and a gentle euphoria emerges. Thought connectivity increases, with novel associations and mild pattern recognition enhancement. Visual effects are subtle: slight color enhancement and occasional tracers behind moving objects. Physical stimulation is the dominant somatic feature, distinguishing 5-MeO-DALT from more sedating tryptamines. Spontaneous body sensations, mild temperature fluctuations, and increased wakefulness are common. Sexual arousal enhancement may be noticed. Total duration is approximately 2–3 hours.
Inferred from Shulgin's self-experiment (12–20 mg active range), community reports characterizing the experience as predominantly physical and stimulating, and PsychonautWiki dose tiers.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from Shulgin's self-experiment (12–20 mg active range), community reports characterizing the experience as predominantly physical and stimulating, and PsychonautWiki dose tiers.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At common doses, the full 5-MeO-DALT experience manifests. Emotional enhancement is pronounced — appreciation of music, social warmth, and aesthetic sensitivity increase substantially. Thought acceleration and thought connectivity are prominent cognitive features, with analysis enhancement and conceptual thinking becoming accessible. Visual effects remain moderate compared to classical psychedelics: color enhancement, visual drifting, symmetrical texture repetition, and visual acuity enhancement are present but rarely overwhelming. Stimulation is marked and distinguishes the experience from DMT or psilocybin. Spontaneous body sensations pervade, and sexual arousal enhancement is frequently reported. Pupil dilation, mild tachycardia, and temperature dysregulation occur. Time alteration becomes noticeable. Functional impairment is moderate. Sleep is unlikely for 3–4 hours post-ingestion. Total duration is typically 2–4 hours.
Shulgin's 12–20 mg active range with described effects (positive emotional changes, music appreciation, closed-eye visuals) corresponds approximately to the common dose tier. Community reports emphasize physical/stimulating character over deep visual or introspective effects. PsychonautWiki dose tiers anchor the range.
ReasoningReasoning
Shulgin's 12–20 mg active range with described effects (positive emotional changes, music appreciation, closed-eye visuals) corresponds approximately to the common dose tier. Community reports emphasize physical/stimulating character over deep visual or introspective effects. PsychonautWiki dose tiers anchor the range.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At strong doses, all effect domains intensify substantially. Visual effects become more prominent — drifting, symmetrical texture repetition, and color alteration are clearly present, though still less intense than equivalent doses of classical tryptamines. Thought acceleration and novelty enhancement may become difficult to direct. Emotional enhancement can swing toward anxiety or dysphoria in unfavorable settings. Memory suppression during the peak is common. Physical effects intensify: tachycardia, pronounced temperature dysregulation, profuse sweating, and abnormal heartbeat sensation may occur. Stimulation can become uncomfortable. The risk of agitation increases significantly — case reports of extreme agitation and combativeness suggest that strong doses can produce a markedly disorienting state. Duration extends slightly beyond the common range, typically 3–4 hours total.
Strong dose effects inferred from the escalating toxidrome documented in case reports (agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis), Shulgin's upper active range, and community reports. No controlled dose-response data exist for 5-MeO-DALT.
ReasoningReasoning
Strong dose effects inferred from the escalating toxidrome documented in case reports (agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis), Shulgin's upper active range, and community reports. No controlled dose-response data exist for 5-MeO-DALT.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At heavy doses, the experience becomes unpredictable and carries significant medical risk. Delirium, loss of consciousness, and extreme agitation are documented at doses in this range. Visual hallucinations may be intense. Cognitive coherence is substantially impaired — memory suppression is profound and disorientation is likely. Physical risks escalate sharply: tachycardia, profuse diaphoresis, hyperthermia, and risk of rhabdomyolysis (skeletal muscle breakdown) are documented in clinical case reports. Cyclic myoclonus has been observed. Behavioral impairment can lead to dangerous actions — one indirect fatality involved an intoxicated individual struck by a vehicle. Heavy doses of 5-MeO-DALT represent a medical emergency risk. The compound is not detected by standard hospital toxicology screens, complicating clinical management.
Heavy dose effects directly documented in four published case reports (delirium, rhabdomyolysis, myoclonus, loss of consciousness). However, exact doses consumed in case reports are poorly characterized — only one case has a confirmed dose (~10.7 mg at 11% tablet purity). Heavy tier boundaries are from community consensus only.
ReasoningReasoning
Heavy dose effects directly documented in four published case reports (delirium, rhabdomyolysis, myoclonus, loss of consciousness). However, exact doses consumed in case reports are poorly characterized — only one case has a confirmed dose (~10.7 mg at 11% tablet purity). Heavy tier boundaries are from community consensus only.
Evidence basis: published_case_series
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateReceptor binding profiles and behavioral pharmacology of ring-substituted N,N-diallyltryptamine analogsKlein LM, Cozzi NV, Daley PF, Brandt SD, Halberstadt AL · 2018 · Neuropharmacology
- [2]moderateThe recreational tryptamine 5-MeO-DALT (N,N-diallyl-5-methoxytryptamine): a brief reviewCorkery JM, Durkin E, Elliott S, Schifano F, Ghodse AH · 2012 · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
- [3]weak5-Methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine - WHO ECDD RepositoryWHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence · 2020linkno claims checked
- [4]weak
- [5]weakDelirium due to intoxication from the novel synthetic tryptamine 5-MeO-DALTJovel A, Felthous A, Bhattacharyya A · 2014 · Journal of Forensic Sciencesdoi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12367pubmed 243291189 claims checked5 verified1 inconclusive3 not supported
- [6]weak5-MeO-DALT; a novel designer drug on the market causing acute delirium and rhabdomyolysisKalasho A, Vibe Nielsen S · 2016 · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- [7]weak5-Meo-DALT-induced Cyclic Myoclonus (P3.013)Thammongkolchai T, Termsarasab P, Alkhachroum A, Gujrati Y, Frucht SJ · 2015 · Neurology (conference abstract)doi.org/10.1212/wnl.84.14_supplement.p3.0135 claims checked5 verified
- [8]weakLoss of Consciousness and Visual Hallucinations Related to 5-MeO-DALT Intake, a Case Report Confirmed by Toxicological AnalysesDufayet L, Langrand J, Alvarez JC, Islam Larabi A · 2022 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [9]moderateReceptor binding profiles and quantitative structure-affinity relationships of some 5-substituted-N,N-diallyltryptamines.Cozzi NV, Daley PF · 2016 · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Lettersdoi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.053pubmed 267397819 claims checked4 verified1 partial3 inconclusive1 not supported
- [10]moderateMetabolism of the new psychoactive substances N,N-diallyltryptamine (DALT) and 5-methoxy-DALT and their detectability in urine by GC-MS, LC-MSn, and LC-HR-MS-MSMichely JA, Helfer AG, Brandt SD, Meyer MR, Maurer HH · 2015 · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- [11]moderatePharmacologic Activity of Substituted Tryptamines at 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, 5-HT1A Receptors and SERTKozell LB, Eshleman AJ, Swanson TL, Bloom SH, Wolfrum KM, et al. · 2023 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [12]moderateTolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Micede la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [13]moderateAnalytical characterization of N,N-diallyltryptamine (DALT) and 16 ring-substituted derivativesBrandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Dowling G, Talbot B, Westphal F, Meyer MR, Maurer HH, Halberstadt AL · 2017 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [14]moderate5-MeO-DALT: the freebase of N,N-diallyl-5-methoxytryptamineChadeayne AR, Pham DNK, Golen JA, Manke DR · 2020 · IUCrData
- [15]weak5-Methoxy-DALT - SWGDRUG MonographScientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs (SWGDRUG) · 2015linkno claims checked
- [16]moderateSetup of a Serotonin 2A Receptor (5-HT2AR) BioassayPottie E, Cannaert A, Van Uytfanghe K, Stove CP · 2019 · Analytical Chemistry
- [17]moderateMetabolism of the tryptamine-derived new psychoactive substances 5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, 5-MeO-2-Me-ALCHT, and 5-MeO-2-Me-DIPT and their detectability in urineCaspar AT, Gaab JB, Michely JA, Brandt SD, Meyer MR, Maurer HH · 2018 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [18]moderateA Comprehensive HPLC-MS-MS Screening Method for 77 New Psychoactive Substances, 24 Classic Drugs and 18 Related Metabolites in Blood, Urine and Oral FluidDi Trana A, Mannocchi G, Pirani F, La Maida N, Gottardi M, Pichini S, Busardò FP · 2020 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [19]moderateDevelopment and validation of a rapid LC-MS/MS method for the detection of 182 novel psychoactive substances in whole bloodGiorgetti A, Barone R, Pelletti G, Garagnani M, Pascali JP · 2021 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [20]strongLocomotor and discriminative stimulus effects of four novel hallucinogens in rodentsGatch MB, Dolan SB, Forster MJ · 2017 · Behavioural Pharmacology
- [21]moderateIn vitro screening of psychoactive drugs by [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in rat brain membranes.Nonaka R, Nagai F, Ogata A, Satoh K · 2007 · Biological & pharmaceutical bulletinpubmed 180577211 claim checked1 verified
- [22]moderateToxicology and Analysis of Psychoactive Tryptamines.Malaca S, Lo Faro AF, Tamborra A, Pichini S, Busardò FP, Huestis MA · 2020 · International journal of molecular sciences
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary18 claims15verified1partial1inconclusive1not supported
partial5-MeO-DALT (5-methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine) is a synthetic substituted tryptamine psychedelic active orally at 12–20 mg with a total duration of 2–4 hours[9]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms 12–20 mg oral psychoactivity from Shulgin's self-experiments, but the 2–4 hour duration is not mentioned anywhere in the abstract. Duration is a specific factual assertion not confirmed by this source.
5-MeO-DALT psychoactive at 12-20 mg self-experiments.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAmong tryptamine psychedelics, it occupies an unusual pharmacological position: high-affinity 5-HT₁A agonism (Ki ≈ 8 nM) coexists with moderate 5-HT₂A agonism, producing a predominantly physical and stimulating experience rather than the deeply visual or introspective states characteristic of classical tryptamines such as DMT or psilocybin.[1]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms binding at 45 receptor/transporter sites and the key behavioral finding that 5-HT2A positively and 5-HT1A negatively contribute to HTR potency, supporting the mechanistic claim. The Ki ≈ 8 nM and experiential characterization are reasonable inferences from data in the full paper.
5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedFirst synthesized by Alexander Shulgin in May 2004 and distributed to research chemical markets within weeks, 5-MeO-DALT has not entered clinical development — no registered trials exist[2]model confidence 78%
The review abstract confirms synthesis details available from 2004 and limited pharmacological literature/clinical development. Specific details (May, 'within weeks') would be in the full text but are consistent with the review's scope.
Synthesis details available from 2004; limited pharmacological literature; controlled in few countries.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe published evidence base comprises receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology studies in rodents, metabolic characterization in rat and human liver microsomes, and four clinical case reports of adverse presentations[1]model confidence 90%
This paper directly provides receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology (HTR assay in mice) data — one of the cited components of the evidence base.
DALT and 5-MeO-DALT binding at 45 receptor and transporter sites; HTR assay in mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe published evidence base comprises receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology studies in rodents, metabolic characterization in rat and human liver microsomes, and four clinical case reports of adverse presentations[9]model confidence 90%
This paper directly provides receptor binding data at 45 sites — one of the cited components of the evidence base.
Binding at 45 receptors: 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B ~10-80 nM; 5-HT2A 250-730 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe published evidence base comprises receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology studies in rodents, metabolic characterization in rat and human liver microsomes, and four clinical case reports of adverse presentations[10]model confidence 92%
This paper directly provides the metabolic characterization component, characterizing CYP pathways consistent with rat/pHLM work.
Metabolic pathways: aromatic/aliphatic hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, N-oxidation, O-demethylation; phase II glucuronidation/sulfation. CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe published evidence base comprises receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology studies in rodents, metabolic characterization in rat and human liver microsomes, and four clinical case reports of adverse presentations[5]model confidence 92%
This is one of the four case reports of adverse presentations — directly constituting part of the evidence base claimed.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose. First published case report.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe published evidence base comprises receptor binding and behavioral pharmacology studies in rodents, metabolic characterization in rat and human liver microsomes, and four clinical case reports of adverse presentations[8]model confidence 92%
This is one of the four clinical case reports of adverse presentations forming the evidence base.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity); plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusive5-MeO-DALT acts as a full agonist at 5-HT₁A (Ki = 7.95 ± 0.52 nM), 5-HT₂A (Ki = 48 ± 15 nM), and 5-HT₂C (Ki = 573 ± 48 nM) receptors, with additional nanomolar-range affinity at 5-HT₁D, 5-HT₆, 5-HT₇, and α₂-adrenergic subtypes[11]model confidence 65%
Abstract covers 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and SERT for 21 tryptamines, but does not provide the specific Ki values claimed and does not mention 5-HT1D, 5-HT6, 5-HT7, or α2 subtypes. The specific numerical values and additional receptor subtypes cannot be verified from the abstract.
21 substituted tryptamines at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supported5-MeO-DALT acts as a full agonist at 5-HT₁A (Ki = 7.95 ± 0.52 nM), 5-HT₂A (Ki = 48 ± 15 nM), and 5-HT₂C (Ki = 573 ± 48 nM) receptors, with additional nanomolar-range affinity at 5-HT₁D, 5-HT₆, 5-HT₇, and α₂-adrenergic subtypes[9]model confidence 88%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract from this paper reports 5-HT2A at 250–730 nM, which directly contradicts the claimed Ki = 48 ± 15 nM (a >5-fold discrepancy). The 48 nM value appears to originate from a different study (Kozell et al), not this citation.
5-HT1A and 5-HT2B ~10-80 nM; 5-HT2A 250-730 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMultiple regression analysis of head twitch response potency across the DALT series (R² = 0.87) shows 5-HT₂A binding positively predicts hallucinogenic activity while 5-HT₁A binding negatively modulates it — a buffering effect likely underlying the compound's muted visual profile.[1]model confidence 82%
Abstract directly confirms 5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency. The R² = 0.87 is a specific statistical value from the full paper not in the abstract, but the abstract clearly supports the main finding.
5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCase reports document delirium, rhabdomyolysis, and cyclic myoclonus as serious adverse events; one indirect fatality occurred when an intoxicated individual was struck by a vehicle[5]model confidence 90%
This paper documents delirium as a serious adverse event, which is one of the claimed adverse events. It is appropriately cited collectively alongside papers covering rhabdomyolysis, myoclonus, and the fatality.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose; physical restraint and IV sedation required. First published case report.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCase reports document delirium, rhabdomyolysis, and cyclic myoclonus as serious adverse events; one indirect fatality occurred when an intoxicated individual was struck by a vehicle[6]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly documents acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis as serious adverse events.
Case report: acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT use.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCase reports document delirium, rhabdomyolysis, and cyclic myoclonus as serious adverse events; one indirect fatality occurred when an intoxicated individual was struck by a vehicle[7]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly documents cyclic myoclonus as a serious adverse event following 5-MeO-DALT use.
29-year-old man with cyclic myoclonus (all extremities, trunk, neck, every ~10 min) after 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCase reports document delirium, rhabdomyolysis, and cyclic myoclonus as serious adverse events; one indirect fatality occurred when an intoxicated individual was struck by a vehicle[2]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms the first reported death from trauma while under the influence, supporting the indirect fatality component of the claim.
first reported death (mid-2010, trauma under influence).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe compound is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens, creating a significant clinical diagnostic gap[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly states the compound was not detected by routine screens, directly supporting the claim.
not detected by routine screens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTolerance is expected to develop rapidly via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation but has not been confirmed substance-specifically[12]model confidence 85%
Abstract supports the mechanism (5-HT2A downregulation mediating tolerance) via class-level animal data, and the caveat about substance-specific confirmation is appropriate given the data comes from DOI/LSD studies.
Repeated DOI induces HTR tolerance via 5-HT2A downregulation; cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHuman pharmacokinetic parameters remain uncharacterized beyond a single plasma concentration datapoint.[8]model confidence 88%
The abstract provides exactly one plasma concentration measurement (7 ng/mL at 8h), consistent with the claim that only a single datapoint exists. No full PK profile is provided.
plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h. LC-MS/MS quantification.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
history4 claims1verified3inconclusive
inconclusiveShulgin's self-experimentation indicated oral psychoactivity in the 12–20 mg range, with effects lasting 2–4 hours and characterized by positive emotional changes, lightheadedness, closed-eye visuals, and enhanced appreciation of music and sex.[9]model confidence 65%
Abstract confirms Shulgin self-experiments at 12–20 mg but does not describe the specific qualitative effects (positive emotional changes, lightheadedness, CEVs, music/sex) or the 2–4 hour duration. These details are in the full paper but cannot be verified from the abstract alone.
5-MeO-DALT psychoactive at 12-20 mg self-experiments. Confirms Shulgin synthesized DALT and 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe first reported death involving 5-MeO-DALT occurred in mid-2010 in the United Kingdom, when a man in his mid-20s was struck by a lorry while intoxicated — an indirect fatality attributed to behavioral impairment rather than direct pharmacological toxicity.[2]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms the first reported death in mid-2010 from trauma while under the influence. Specific details (UK, mid-20s, lorry) would be in the full review text, but the abstract supports the event's existence and indirect nature.
first reported death (mid-2010, trauma under influence).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveShulgin described the synthesis procedure and self-experimental effects in a document sent to a research associate known by the pseudonym "Murple"[2]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms synthesis details from 2004, consistent with this historical event, but the pseudonym 'Murple' and the specific communication to a research associate are not mentioned. This level of detail would be in the full text.
Synthesis details available from 2004.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveBy 2015, fourteen European countries had identified the compound in seizure or monitoring data, including the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, France, Denmark, and Italy[2]model confidence 55%
Abstract says 'controlled in few countries' — this does not confirm or deny 14 European countries identifying it in seizure/monitoring data. Identification in monitoring data ≠ being controlled. The specific country count and list would be in the full review text.
controlled in few countries.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
chemistry2 claims1verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe molecule contains no stereogenic centers and is therefore achiral; enantiomeric considerations do not apply.[14]model confidence 60%
Abstract provides crystal structure data (space group P21/n, unit cell parameters) but does not explicitly state whether the molecule has stereogenic centers or is achiral. Chirality would need to be inferred from the structure, which may be in the full crystallographic analysis.
Crystal structure of 5-MeO-DALT freebase: monoclinic, P21/n, a=6.1444, b=12.8514, c=19.3315 Angstrom, beta=91.626, Z=4.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMolecules form zigzag chains along the b-axis via N–H⋯N hydrogen bonds (N⋯N distance = 2.988 Å), adopting a colorless plate morphology.[14]model confidence 88%
Abstract explicitly confirms N-H...N hydrogen bonds forming zigzag chains and colorless plate crystal morphology. The specific N...N distance (2.988 Å) is a crystallographic detail from the full data tables.
N-H...N hydrogen bonds form zigzag chains. Colorless plate crystals.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacology15 claims14verified1not supported
verifiedPsychedelic-type effects are mediated principally through 5-HT₂A receptor agonism, while concurrent high-affinity 5-HT₁A agonism (Ki = 7.95 ± 0.52 nM) negatively modulates the behavioral expression of 5-HT₂A-mediated activity.[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract directly confirms 5-HT2A positively and 5-HT1A negatively contributes to HTR potency (the behavioral proxy for psychedelic activity). Specific Ki values would be in the data tables.
5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedKlein et al. (2018) quantified this relationship using multiple regression analysis of head twitch response (HTR) potency across the DALT series. 5-HT₂A binding affinity made a significant positive contribution to HTR potency (R² = 0.87 for the full model), while 5-HT₁A affinity contributed negatively — consistent with 5-HT₁A agonism buffering the hallucinogenic response[1]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms the key finding: 5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency across the DALT series. The R² = 0.87 is a specific statistic from the full paper not in the abstract, but the directional findings are confirmed.
rank order of potency for HTR; 5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTwo comprehensive receptor screening studies have characterized 5-MeO-DALT at 45 receptor and transporter sites each, with additional functional data from Kozell et al. (2023) and Pottie et al. (2019).[9]model confidence 92%
This paper is one of the two comprehensive 45-receptor screening studies referred to in the claim.
Binding at 45 receptors: 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B ~10-80 nM; 5-HT2A 250-730 nM. Also binds alpha2 adrenergic, sigma, H1, SERT, NET.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTwo comprehensive receptor screening studies have characterized 5-MeO-DALT at 45 receptor and transporter sites each, with additional functional data from Kozell et al. (2023) and Pottie et al. (2019).[1]model confidence 92%
This paper is the second of the two comprehensive 45-receptor/transporter screening studies for the DALT series.
DALT and 5-MeO-DALT binding at 45 receptor and transporter sites.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTwo comprehensive receptor screening studies have characterized 5-MeO-DALT at 45 receptor and transporter sites each, with additional functional data from Kozell et al. (2023) and Pottie et al. (2019).[11]model confidence 80%
This paper (Kozell et al) is correctly cited as providing additional functional data (at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, SERT), not as one of the 45-site screening studies. The citation is appropriate.
21 substituted tryptamines at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTwo comprehensive receptor screening studies have characterized 5-MeO-DALT at 45 receptor and transporter sites each, with additional functional data from Kozell et al. (2023) and Pottie et al. (2019).[16]model confidence 85%
This paper (Pottie et al) is correctly cited as providing additional functional data via beta-arrestin2 recruitment assay EC50.
beta-arrestin2 recruitment bioassay; 5-MeO-DALT used as test compound alongside LSD and mescaline; EC50 values reported.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe sole human plasma datapoint derives from a clinical case report: 7 ng/mL at 8 hours post-ingestion of approximately 10.7 mg oral[8]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms 7 ng/mL at 8h from 3 tablets at 32.5 mg/tablet × 11% purity = ~10.7 mg active compound. Both the plasma level and the calculated dose are supported.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity); plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMetabolic fate has been characterized in rat urine with confirmation in pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM)[10]model confidence 85%
Abstract describes comprehensive metabolic pathway characterization including CYP enzyme identification, consistent with rat urine/pHLM incubation methodology. The paper title references urine detectability.
Metabolic pathways: aromatic/aliphatic hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, N-oxidation, O-demethylation; phase II glucuronidation/sulfation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal cytochrome P450 enzymes involved are CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, consistent with metabolism data for related DALT derivatives.[10]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly lists CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT metabolism, directly confirming the claim.
CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal cytochrome P450 enzymes involved are CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, consistent with metabolism data for related DALT derivatives.[17]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly confirms the same CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 involvement for related DALT derivatives (5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, etc.), supporting the comparative consistency claim.
O-demethylation, hydroxylation, N-dealkylation for DALT derivatives; CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 involvement.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe recommended urinary detection targets are the N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite (loss of both allyl groups and the methoxy group) and its glucuronide conjugate. 5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens; confirmed identification requires LC-MS/MS[10]model confidence 90%
Abstract explicitly identifies N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite and glucuronide as target urine markers. The LC-MS/MS confirmation method is stated in the paper title. Detection gap from immunoassays is consistent with the specialized methodology used.
Target urine markers: N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite and glucuronide.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe recommended urinary detection targets are the N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite (loss of both allyl groups and the methoxy group) and its glucuronide conjugate. 5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens; confirmed identification requires LC-MS/MS[8]model confidence 90%
Abstract explicitly states the compound was not detected by routine screens and was confirmed by LC-MS/MS quantification.
LC-MS/MS quantification; not detected by routine screens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supportedThe recommended urinary detection targets are the N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite (loss of both allyl groups and the methoxy group) and its glucuronide conjugate. 5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens; confirmed identification requires LC-MS/MS[5]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract is a clinical case report describing the acute toxidrome (agitation, tachycardia, combativeness). It contains no information about urine metabolite detection targets, immunoassay screens, or LC-MS/MS methodology. Completely wrong citation for this claim.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose; physical restraint and IV sedation required.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedValidated LC-MS/MS methods for detection in blood, urine, and oral fluid have been published.[18]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly confirms HPLC-MS-MS validation for 77 NPS including 5-MeO-DALT across blood, urine, and oral fluid matrices.
HPLC-MS-MS validated for 77 NPS including 5-MeO-DALT in blood, urine, oral fluid.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedValidated LC-MS/MS methods for detection in blood, urine, and oral fluid have been published.[19]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms an LC-MS/MS method validated for 182 NPS in whole blood. Cited collectively alongside the paper covering all three matrices; contributes to the general claim about published validated methods.
LC-MS/MS method for 182 NPS in whole blood; fast, cost-effective, applicable to clinical and postmortem toxicology.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
receptor pharmacology6 claims5verified1inconclusive
verifiedBinding affinity data for 5-MeO-DALT derive from two comprehensive screening studies — Cozzi and Daley (2016) and Klein et al. (2018) — with receptor-specific values from Kozell et al. (2023).[9]model confidence 92%
This paper (Cozzi and Daley) is one of the two comprehensive 45-receptor screening studies explicitly named in the claim.
Binding at 45 receptors: 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B ~10-80 nM; 5-HT2A 250-730 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedBinding affinity data for 5-MeO-DALT derive from two comprehensive screening studies — Cozzi and Daley (2016) and Klein et al. (2018) — with receptor-specific values from Kozell et al. (2023).[1]model confidence 92%
This paper (Klein et al) is the second of the two comprehensive 45-receptor/transporter screening studies named in the claim.
DALT and 5-MeO-DALT binding at 45 receptor and transporter sites.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedBinding affinity data for 5-MeO-DALT derive from two comprehensive screening studies — Cozzi and Daley (2016) and Klein et al. (2018) — with receptor-specific values from Kozell et al. (2023).[11]model confidence 85%
This paper (Kozell et al) provides receptor-specific values at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and SERT, consistent with its characterization as providing additional 'receptor-specific values.'
21 substituted tryptamines at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveA >5-fold discrepancy exists between the 5-HT₂A Ki values reported by Cozzi and Daley (250–730 nM range for 5-substituted DALTs) and Kozell et al. (48 ± 15 nM for 5-MeO-DALT specifically)[11]model confidence 60%
The abstract confirms this paper covers 5-HT2A binding for substituted tryptamines, but does not provide the specific Ki value of 48 ± 15 nM that the claim attributes to this study. The specific value would need to be in the full data tables.
21 substituted tryptamines at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAdditional binding has been reported at α₂A, α₂B, and α₂C adrenergic receptors (nanomolar-to-low-micromolar range), σ₁ and σ₂ receptors (micromolar affinity), H₁ histamine receptors (nanomolar affinity for some DALT analogs), DAT (micromolar range), and κ opioid receptors[9]model confidence 83%
Abstract confirms binding at alpha2 adrenergic, sigma, and H1 receptors, as well as SERT and NET. Specific affinity ranges and additional subtypes (DAT, κ opioid) would be in the full 45-receptor dataset.
Also binds alpha2 adrenergic, sigma, H1, SERT, NET.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedIn a β-arrestin2 recruitment assay at the 5-HT₂A receptor, Pottie et al. (2019) confirmed 5-MeO-DALT activation with an EC₅₀ in the low-micromolar to submicromolar range, comparable to mescaline in the same assay system.[16]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms beta-arrestin2 recruitment bioassay with 5-MeO-DALT tested alongside mescaline with EC50 values reported. Specific EC50 range and comparison to mescaline would be in the full paper.
beta-arrestin2 recruitment bioassay; 5-MeO-DALT used as test compound alongside LSD and mescaline; EC50 values reported.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
neuroscience2 claims2verified
verifiedAs a 5-HT₂A receptor agonist confirmed by head twitch response activity and DOM drug discrimination substitution, 5-MeO-DALT is expected to engage the neural circuits established for serotonergic psychedelics: activation of 5-HT₂A receptors on layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex, disruption of thalamocortical gating, dissolution of default mode network (DMN) integrity, and increased global functional connectivity and neural entropy[1]model confidence 80%
This citation is used to support '5-HT₂A receptor agonist confirmed by head twitch response activity.' The abstract directly confirms HTR activity and 5-HT2A's positive contribution. The neural circuit description is class-level inference not claimed from this paper.
HTR assay in mice; 5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAs a 5-HT₂A receptor agonist confirmed by head twitch response activity and DOM drug discrimination substitution, 5-MeO-DALT is expected to engage the neural circuits established for serotonergic psychedelics: activation of 5-HT₂A receptors on layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex, disruption of thalamocortical gating, dissolution of default mode network (DMN) integrity, and increased global functional connectivity and neural entropy[20]model confidence 88%
This citation is used to support 'DOM drug discrimination substitution.' The abstract explicitly confirms full substitution for DOM in drug discrimination, directly supporting this portion of the claim.
fully substituted for DOM but not MDMA in drug discrimination.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail8 claims7verified1not supported
verifiedThe recommended urinary detection targets are the N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite (loss of both allyl groups and the methoxy group) and its glucuronide conjugate.[10]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly identifies N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite and glucuronide as target urine markers.
Target urine markers: N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite and glucuronide.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe only published human plasma measurement is a single datapoint: 7 ng/mL at 8 hours after oral ingestion of approximately 10.7 mg[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 7 ng/mL at 8h. Dose calculation: 3 tablets × 32.5 mg × 11% purity = ~10.7 mg active compound. Directly supported.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity); plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMichely et al. (2015) characterized the metabolic fate of 5-MeO-DALT using rat urine analysis with confirmatory incubation in pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM).[10]model confidence 85%
Abstract describes comprehensive metabolic pathway characterization with CYP identification, consistent with the stated methodology. Paper title references urine detectability. The pHLM confirmation method would be in the full text.
Metabolic pathways: aromatic/aliphatic hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, N-oxidation, O-demethylation; phase II glucuronidation/sulfation. CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal CYP enzymes mediating Phase I metabolism are CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4[10]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly lists CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThis CYP profile is consistent with data from structurally related DALT derivatives including 5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, 5-MeO-2-Me-ALCHT, and 5-MeO-2-Me-DIPT.[17]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms the same CYP profile (CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4) for DALT derivatives. The paper title explicitly names 5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, 5-MeO-2-Me-ALCHT, and 5-MeO-2-Me-DIPT.
O-demethylation, hydroxylation, N-dealkylation for DALT derivatives; CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 involvement.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens — a significant clinical limitation documented across multiple case reports[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly confirms the compound was not detected by routine screens.
not detected by routine screens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supported5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens — a significant clinical limitation documented across multiple case reports[5]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract describes the acute clinical toxidrome only. It makes no mention of toxicology screen results or immunoassay detection. This citation does not document the immunoassay detection gap.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose; physical restraint and IV sedation required.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedConfirmed detection requires LC-MS/MS methodology, which has been validated for blood, urine, and oral fluid matrices.[18]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly confirms HPLC-MS-MS validated for 5-MeO-DALT in blood, urine, and oral fluid.
HPLC-MS-MS validated for 77 NPS including 5-MeO-DALT in blood, urine, oral fluid.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
effects overview2 claims1verified1inconclusive
verifiedThe 5-MeO-DALT experience is shaped by its unusual dual-receptor pharmacology: high 5-HT₁A affinity appears to buffer the 5-HT₂A-mediated visual and perceptual intensity typical of classical tryptamines, producing a state that is fundamentally more somatic and stimulating than introspective or visionary[1]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms the dual-receptor pharmacological mechanism: 5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR. The experiential characterization (somatic/stimulating vs introspective/visionary) is a reasonable inference from this mechanistic finding.
5-HT2A positive and 5-HT1A negative contributions to HTR potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe smoked route compresses the entire arc into 15–20 minutes with a sharper intensity peak; oral administration produces a more gradual, longer experience (2–4 hours).[9]model confidence 55%
Abstract confirms oral self-experiments at 12–20 mg but does not provide route comparison data or specific durations (2–4 hours oral; 15–20 minutes smoked). These details would be in the self-experimental notes in the full paper.
5-MeO-DALT psychoactive at 12-20 mg self-experiments.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
safety22 claims19verified1partial2not supported
verifiedAcute psychosis, delirium, and severe agitation are documented in case reports[8]model confidence 80%
Abstract documents LOC and visual hallucinations, which are consistent with acute psychosis and delirium, supporting the general claim about these adverse events being documented in case reports.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe coroner attributed death to traumatic injuries sustained due to behavioral impairment, not direct pharmacological toxicity.[2]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms death from trauma while under the influence, consistent with behavioral impairment as the proximate cause rather than direct toxicity. Coroner's specific attribution would be in the full text.
first reported death (mid-2010, trauma under influence).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAcross four published case reports, the documented acute toxidrome includes:[5]model confidence 90%
This is the first published case report documenting the acute toxidrome, directly contributing to the four-report evidence base.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose. First published case report.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAcross four published case reports, the documented acute toxidrome includes:[6]model confidence 90%
This is one of the four case reports documenting the acute toxidrome, directly contributing to the evidence base.
Case report: acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT use.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAcross four published case reports, the documented acute toxidrome includes:[7]model confidence 90%
This case report documenting cyclic myoclonus is one of the four reports comprising the evidence base.
29-year-old man with cyclic myoclonus (all extremities, trunk, neck, every ~10 min) after 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAcross four published case reports, the documented acute toxidrome includes:[8]model confidence 90%
This case report (LOC, visual hallucinations) is one of the four reports comprising the toxidrome evidence base.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMusculoskeletal: Rhabdomyolysis (skeletal muscle breakdown) with secondary risk of acute kidney injury[6]model confidence 92%
Abstract explicitly documents rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT. The secondary AKI risk is a well-established medical consequence of rhabdomyolysis.
Case report: acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT use.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly states the compound was not detected by routine screens.
not detected by routine screens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supported5-MeO-DALT is not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens[5]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract describes the clinical toxidrome (agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis) but contains no information about immunoassay detection or toxicology screen results. This citation does not support the detection claim.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose; physical restraint and IV sedation required.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedEmergency physicians should consider synthetic tryptamines when patients present with unexplained sympathomimetic or serotonergic toxidrome and negative routine screens.[22]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms 5-MeO-DALT is among the most prevalent tryptamines acting as a 5-HT2A agonist, and notes 22 new analytical methods needed for detection. This supports the clinical implication that routine screens miss it and physicians should consider tryptamines.
5-MeO-DALT among most prevalent tryptamines; 5-HT2A agonist; 22 new analytical methods 2015-2020.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedOnline products have documented extreme impurity: one analytically confirmed case found 11% purity in tablets marketed as 5-MeO-DALT, with each tablet containing approximately 3.6 mg of active compound despite a 32.5 mg total tablet weight[8]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly reports 32.5 mg/tablet at 11% purity (= 3.575 mg active ≈ 3.6 mg), with analytical confirmation by LC-MS/MS.
3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity); plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h. LC-MS/MS quantification.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAcute psychosis, delirium, and severe agitation are documented in case reports[5]model confidence 92%
Abstract title references delirium and the case description includes extreme agitation and combativeness, directly supporting these adverse events.
extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose. First published case report.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialDe la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) demonstrated in mice that DOI-induced HTR tolerance develops within 24 hours of a single dose, involves 5-HT₂A receptor density reduction in frontal cortex, and shows cross-tolerance between psychedelics (DOI↔LSD) but not with non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists[12]model confidence 72%
Abstract confirms cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD, no cross-tolerance with non-psychedelic 5-HT2AR agonists (lisuride), and 5-HT2A downregulation as the mechanism. However, the abstract says 'repeated DOI' not 'single dose', and does not specify 'frontal cortex' — two specific factual claims that are not confirmed.
Repeated DOI induces HTR tolerance via 5-HT2A downregulation; cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD; nonpsychedelic 5-HT2AR agonists (lisuride) do not induce cross-tolerance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMAO inhibition would reduce 5-MeO-DALT clearance (given O-demethylation and N-dealkylation metabolic pathways potentially involving MAO) while simultaneously increasing synaptic serotonin availability, compounding both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic exposure.[10]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms O-demethylation and N-dealkylation as metabolic pathways. The claim appropriately hedges with 'potentially involving MAO.' The CYP-mediated pathways documented do not exclude additional MAO contribution, and the metabolic routes cited are confirmed.
Metabolic pathways: aromatic/aliphatic hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, N-oxidation, O-demethylation; phase II glucuronidation/sulfation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTramadol additionally lowers seizure threshold, which may compound risk given the documented myoclonus case.[7]model confidence 82%
This citation is used to support 'the documented myoclonus case' — the abstract directly documents the cyclic myoclonus case. The tramadol seizure threshold claim is general pharmacology cited separately.
29-year-old man with cyclic myoclonus (all extremities, trunk, neck, every ~10 min) after 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPharmacokinetic interactions: 5-MeO-DALT is metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4[10]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly lists CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT metabolism.
CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedDrug discrimination data show that 5-MeO-DALT does not substitute for MDMA in trained rats, suggesting different dominant mechanisms and potentially different interaction profiles than entactogens.[20]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly states 5-MeO-DALT fully substituted for DOM but not MDMA in drug discrimination, directly supporting the claim.
fully substituted for DOM but not MDMA in drug discrimination.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedConditions predisposing to rhabdomyolysis: Given the documented case of rhabdomyolysis, individuals with myopathies, metabolic muscle disorders, or conditions increasing rhabdomyolysis susceptibility face elevated risk.[6]model confidence 88%
Abstract documents rhabdomyolysis as a documented adverse event, supporting the clinical reasoning about elevated risk in susceptible individuals.
Case report: acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT use.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular disease: Tachycardia is documented across case reports[5]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly documents tachycardia in the case presentation.
extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supportedCardiovascular disease: Tachycardia is documented across case reports[8]model confidence 85%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract for this case report describes LOC and visual hallucinations — it does not mention tachycardia. This paper cannot serve as a citation for tachycardia being documented.
46-year-old man: LOC and visual hallucinations after 3 tablets (32.5 mg/tablet, 11% purity); plasma 7 ng/mL at 8h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedSeizure disorders: Cyclic myoclonus has been documented[7]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly and unambiguously documents cyclic myoclonus following 5-MeO-DALT use.
29-year-old man with cyclic myoclonus (all extremities, trunk, neck, every ~10 min) after 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHepatic impairment: 5-MeO-DALT is extensively hepatically metabolized via CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4[10]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 metabolism for 5-MeO-DALT, directly supporting the hepatic metabolism claim.
CYPs: CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 for 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
clinical evidence3 claims1verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveThe patient recovered.[5]model confidence 55%
Abstract describes management (physical restraint and IV sedation) but does not mention recovery or outcome. Recovery would be documented in the full case report.
Young healthy male: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness after standard dose; physical restraint and IV sedation required. First published case report.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe likely mechanism involves hyperthermia and sustained muscular exertion during the agitated state.[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract documents rhabdomyolysis but does not describe the proposed mechanism (hyperthermia and sustained muscular exertion). The mechanistic discussion would be in the case report text.
Case report: acute delirium and rhabdomyolysis associated with 5-MeO-DALT use.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThis case — presented as a conference abstract rather than a full peer-reviewed publication — represents the first documented neurological presentation of 5-MeO-DALT-induced myoclonus.[7]model confidence 92%
Abstract explicitly states this is the 'First report of myoclonus as neurological presentation of 5-MeO-DALT.' The paper type 'other' and the '(P3.013)' designation in the title are consistent with a conference abstract format.
First report of myoclonus as neurological presentation of 5-MeO-DALT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
comparative pharmacology5 claims1verified1partial3inconclusive
partial5-MeO-DALT dose-dependently increased locomotor activity in mice, with peak stimulation at 10 mg/kg and suppression at 25 mg/kg — a biphasic pattern distinct from the dose-dependent locomotor depression characteristically observed with NBOMe-class compounds.[20]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms dose-dependent locomotor increase with peak at 10 mg/kg. The specific claim of suppression at 25 mg/kg (biphasic pattern) is not mentioned in the abstract and cannot be verified. The NBOMe comparison is also not in the abstract.
5-MeO-DALT: dose-dependent locomotor increase (peak 10 mg/kg).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveNotably, 2-position substituted analogs (5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, 5-F-2-Me-DALT) and bulky substitutions (2-Ph-DALT, 7-Et-DALT) abolished HTR entirely, indicating strict structural requirements for hallucinogenic activity in this series.[1]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms the HTR assay was run across the DALT series with rank order of potency reported, but does not specifically mention the 2-position substituted analogs or their abolishment of HTR. These specific SAR findings would be in the paper's data tables and discussion.
HTR assay in mice; rank order of potency for HTR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedIn the [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay, 5-MeO-DMT ranked as the most potent tryptamine tested, with 5-MeO-DALT second[21]model confidence 97%
Abstract explicitly confirms the G protein activation rank: 5-MeO-DMT > 5-MeO-DALT, making 5-MeO-DMT first and 5-MeO-DALT second.
G protein activation: 5-MeO-DALT second most potent tryptamine (behind 5-MeO-DMT). Rank: 5-MeO-DMT > 5-MeO-DALT > 5-MeO-AMT > 5-MeO-MIPT > 5-MeO-DIPT > DPT > AMT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveDespite this relatively high G-protein activation potency, the allyl substituents substantially reduce 5-HT₂A binding affinity compared to the dimethyl analog, while increasing 5-HT₁A affinity — resulting in the characteristically muted visual profile and more physically stimulating quality reported by users.[1]model confidence 58%
Abstract covers binding data and HTR but does not describe SAR comparisons between allyl and dimethyl substitution. The specific finding about allyl reducing 5-HT2A and increasing 5-HT1A relative to the dimethyl analog would be in the paper's SAR analysis section.
DALT and 5-MeO-DALT binding at 45 receptor and transporter sites; HTR assay in mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveDespite this relatively high G-protein activation potency, the allyl substituents substantially reduce 5-HT₂A binding affinity compared to the dimethyl analog, while increasing 5-HT₁A affinity — resulting in the characteristically muted visual profile and more physically stimulating quality reported by users.[9]model confidence 58%
Abstract provides affinity values for 5-MeO-DALT but does not present SAR comparisons between allyl and dimethyl substitution patterns. This structural comparison would be in the QSAR analysis section of the full paper.
Binding at 45 receptors: 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B ~10-80 nM; 5-HT2A 250-730 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 26, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 5-MeO-DALT | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary compound identity verification | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 5-MeO-DALT tryptamine pharmacology | 13 results, 12 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAll directly relevant to 5-MeO-DALT pharmacology, case reports, or tryptamine overview | |||
| 3literature search | OpenAlex | 5-MeO-DALT N,N-diallyl-5-methoxytryptamine psychedelic | 10 results, 5 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDirectly relevant to 5-MeO-DALT pharmacology, case reports, and NPS context | |||
| 4web search | Web | 5-MeO-DALT legal status scheduling UK US Australia Germany 2024 | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComprehensive legal status across jurisdictions | |||
| 5web search | Web | 5-MeO-DALT Shulgin TIHKAL synthesis history | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDiscovery timeline and attribution | |||
| 6document retrieval | WHO ECDD Repository | — | 1 result, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleOfficial WHO assessment for scheduling decision and physical properties | |||
| 7web search | Web | WHO ECDD 43rd meeting 5-MeO-DALT critical review recommendation | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleScheduling recommendation clarity | |||
| 8literature search | PubMed | N,N-diallyltryptamine serotonin receptor binding affinity Ki 5-HT2A | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical binding affinity data and discovery confirmation | |||
| 9document retrieval | PubMed Central | — | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDefinitive crystallographic/physical property data | |||
| 10web search | Web | 5-MeO-DALT melting point hydrochloride freebase physical properties | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDefinitive physical property data | |||
| 11web search | Web | 5-MeO-DALT Ki nM binding affinity receptor data table | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleSpecific Ki and EC50 values for pharmacology section | |||
| 12clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 5-MeO-DALT diallyltryptamine | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms absence of registered clinical trials | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 5-MeO-DALT
**PSX ID:** PSX-0077
**Research completed:** 2026-04-26
**Provenance ID:** 44fa7c42-36ba-4498-ac3d-403e6ccd5e4e
---
## Chemical Identity
**Name:** 5-MeO-DALT (5-methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine)
**Systematic IUPAC name:** N-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-N-prop-2-en-1-yl-prop-2-en-1-amine
**Alternative IUPAC:** N-allyl-N-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)prop-2-en-1-amine
**Other names:** Foxtrot (street/market name); N,N-diallyl-5-methoxytryptamine
**PubChem CID:** 50878551 — verified via API [Ref 16 by proxy; PubChem lookup]
**Molecular formula:** C₁₇H₂₂N₂O — confirmed [Ref 1, PubChem]
**Molecular weight:** 270.37 g/mol — confirmed [Ref 1, PubChem]
**InChIKey:** HGRHWEAUHXYNNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N — confirmed [PubChem]
**Brief discrepancies:** The brief listed SMILES, molecular formula, molecular weight, InChIKey, and PubChem CID fields as empty. PubChem confirms: formula C₁₇H₂₂N₂O, MW 270.37, CID 50878551, InChIKey HGRHWEAUHXYNNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N. The IUPAC name in the brief matches the PubChem record.
### Physical Properties
**Physical form:** White to off-white (also described as grey, light brown, or tan) crystalline powder; also encountered as yellow, purple, and green compressed tablets [Ref 23].
**Melting point (freebase):** 105.1°C — from SWGDRUG reference monograph [Ref 26].
**Melting point (HCl salt):** 160.3°C — from SWGDRUG reference monograph [Ref 26].
**Solubility:** DMF ~20 mg/mL; DMSO ~15 mg/mL. Freebase is poorly water-soluble; the fumarate salt ("Foxtrot") was specifically developed for water solubility. [Web-retrieved; unverified quantitatively]
**Predicted boiling point:** ~423°C [web-retrieved, computational prediction]
**Crystal structure (freebase):** Monoclinic; space group P2₁/n; unit cell a = 6.1444 Å, b = 12.8514 Å, c = 19.3315 Å, β = 91.626°; Z = 4; calculated density 1.177 Mg/m³; colorless plate morphology. Molecules linked by N–H⋯N hydrogen bonds (N⋯N = 2.988 Å) into zigzag chains along [010] (Chadeayne et al. 2020 [Ref 16]).
**Synthesis method:** Speeter–Anthony tryptamine synthesis; a microwave-accelerated version was used in multi-compound reference standard preparations (Brandt et al. 2017 [Ref 11]).
**No stereogenic centers:** 5-MeO-DALT is achiral; stereochemistry not applicable.
---
## Pharmacology
### Receptor Binding Profile
5-MeO-DALT has a complex, multi-target pharmacological profile with no single dominant mechanism. Data are drawn from two key primary sources: Cozzi & Daley (2016) [Ref 2] and Klein et al. (2018) [Ref 1], both of which screened compounds at 45 receptor and transporter sites. More recent functional data come from Kozell et al. (2023) [Ref 12] and Pottie et al. (2019) [Ref 8].
**Binding affinities (Ki):**
| Receptor / Site | Ki (nM) | Source | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-HT₁A | 7.95 ± 0.52 | Kozell 2023 [Ref 12] | Full agonist; EC₅₀ ~3.4 nM |
| 5-HT₂A | 48 ± 15 (Kozell) or 250–730 (Cozzi) | [Ref 12] / [Ref 2] | Full agonist; assay discrepancy — see Flags |
| 5-HT₂B | ~10–80 | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | Nanomolar range for 5-substituted DALTs |
| 5-HT₂C | 573 ± 48 | Kozell 2023 [Ref 12] | Full agonist |
| 5-HT₁D | 50–400 | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | Nanomolar range for 5-substituted DALTs |
| 5-HT₆ | 50–400 | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | |
| 5-HT₇ | 50–400 | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | |
| SERT | >1,000 | Kozell 2023 [Ref 12] | Negligible uptake inhibition |
| DAT | Micromolar range | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | Minimal |
| α₂A, α₂B, α₂C adrenergic | Nanomolar–low micromolar | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | |
| σ₁, σ₂ | Micromolar | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | Weak |
| H₁ histamine | Nanomolar | Cozzi 2016 [Ref 2] | Nanomolar for some analogs |
| κ opioid | Present | WHO ECDD 2020 [Ref 23] | Exact Ki not in available abstracts |
**Functional bioassay — 5-HT₂AR β-arrestin2 recruitment:** Pottie et al. (2019) [Ref 8] confirmed 5-MeO-DALT activates 5-HT₂A in a β-arrestin2 recruitment assay with EC₅₀ in the low-micromolar to submicromolar range (precise value in abstract but labeled "micromolar range"; comparable to mescaline in the same assay).
**G-protein activation (rat brain membranes):** Nonaka et al. (2007) [Ref 14] found 5-MeO-DALT the second-most potent tryptamine in a [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay, ranking: 5-MeO-DMT > 5-MeO-DALT > 5-MeO-AMT > 5-MeO-MiPT > 5-MeO-DiPT > DPT > AMT.
### Mechanism of Action
5-MeO-DALT is primarily a serotonin receptor agonist. Psychedelic-type effects are mediated principally through 5-HT₂A agonism; the concurrent high-affinity 5-HT₁A agonism (Ki ≈ 8 nM) appears to negatively modulate the behavioral expression of 5-HT₂A-mediated effects [Ref 1]. Klein et al. (2018) [Ref 1] demonstrated via multiple regression in the head twitch response (HTR) assay that 5-HT₂A binding makes a significant positive contribution to HTR potency (R² = 0.87 across the DALT series), while 5-HT₁A makes a negative contribution — consistent with 5-HT₁A agonism buffering the psychedelic expression.
The WHO ECDD (2020) [Ref 23] concluded that 5-MeO-DALT has "no clear single mechanism of action," reflecting its broad multi-receptor profile.
### Behavioral Pharmacology (Animal Studies)
**Head Twitch Response (mice):** 5-MeO-DALT produced dose-dependent HTR, confirming hallucinogen-like activity. Within the DALT series, rank order of HTR potency: 4-AcO-DALT > 5-F-DALT > **5-MeO-DALT** > 4-OH-DALT > DALT > 5-Br-DALT. 5-MeO-2-Me-DALT, 5-F-2-Me-DALT, 2-Ph-DALT, and 7-Et-DALT did not induce HTR (Klein et al. 2018 [Ref 1]).
**Drug Discrimination (rats):** 5-MeO-DALT fully substituted for DOM (prototypical hallucinogen; ≥80% drug-appropriate responding), but produced few or no MDMA-like effects in MDMA-trained rats (Gatch et al. 2017 [Ref 9]). This indicates hallucinogen-class discriminative properties without significant entactogen-like character.
**Locomotor activity (mice):** 5-MeO-DALT dose-dependently increased locomotor activity, with peak effect at 10 mg/kg; a higher dose of 25 mg/kg suppressed activity (Gatch et al. 2017 [Ref 9]). This biphasic locomotor pattern is noted as distinct from the locomotor depression seen with NBOMe compounds.
### Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism
**Route-specific bioavailability:** No published human PK studies. Plasma data from a single case report: 7 ng/mL at 8 hours post-ingestion of approximately 10.7 mg oral dose (Dufayet et al. 2022 [Ref 5]). No Tmax, AUC, or bioavailability data published in humans.
**Metabolic pathways (rat model; human liver microsome confirmation):** Michely et al. (2015) [Ref 3] studied metabolic fate in rat urine with pHLM confirmation:
- Phase I: aromatic hydroxylation, aliphatic hydroxylation, N-dealkylation (loss of allyl groups), N-oxidation, O-demethylation (loss of methoxy group → 5-OH-DALT)
- Phase II: glucuronidation and sulfation of Phase I metabolites
- Principal CYP enzymes: **CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4** (Michely 2015 [Ref 3]; consistent with analog data in Caspar et al. 2018 [Ref 15])
**Main urinary detection targets:** N,O-bis-dealkyl metabolite (loss of both allyl groups and methoxy group) and its glucuronide conjugate (Michely 2015 [Ref 3]).
**Detection:** 5-MeO-DALT is NOT detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens. Confirmed LC-MS/MS detection methods exist and have been validated in blood, urine, and oral fluid [Ref 18, Ref 25]. This is a significant clinical limitation documented in multiple case reports [Ref 5, Ref 6].
---
## History
### Discovery and Synthesis
5-MeO-DALT was first synthesized by Alexander Shulgin, who described synthesis and self-experimental effects in a document sent to a research associate using the pseudonym "Murple" in **May 2004** (Corkery et al. 2012 [Ref 4]; web-retrieved discovery timeline). Shulgin reportedly stated the compound had not previously existed in the scientific literature. A TIHKAL entry for the compound was released online in 2004; however, 5-MeO-DALT was not included in the originally published TiHKAL book.
Synthesis details and self-experiment reports were published by Erowid.org in **August 2004**. The compound became commercially available from internet research chemical vendors around **June 2004**, synthesized by commercial laboratories in China.
The compound first appeared in EMCDDA monitoring reports from **Finland in 2007** and had been reported by **14 European countries** by 2015 (Finland, UK, Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Sweden, Hungary, Denmark, France, Croatia, Cyprus, Italy, Norway, and others).
By Shulgin's self-experiments (as cited in Cozzi & Daley 2016 [Ref 2]), 5-MeO-DALT was reported active orally in the **12–20 mg range** with duration of 2–4 hours.
### Analytical Reference Preparation
The Speeter–Anthony synthesis (microwave-accelerated) was used for analytical reference standard preparation of 17 DALTs including 5-MeO-DALT by Brandt et al. (2017) [Ref 11], providing the first comprehensive NMR, GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, and GC-IR spectral reference data for the compound.
---
## Subjective Effects
### Published Descriptions
**Shulgin (self-experiment, as cited Cozzi & Daley 2016 [Ref 2]):** Psychoactive at 12–20 mg oral; reported positive emotional changes, lightheadedness, increased appreciation of music and sex, closed-eye visuals; duration ~2–4 hours.
**Case report data (Jovel et al. 2014 [Ref 6]; Dufayet et al. 2022 [Ref 5]):** Clinical presentations document loss of consciousness, visual hallucinations, extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, and combativeness. These are adverse/acute overdose presentations, not descriptions of controlled recreational use.
**User report characterization (web-retrieved; Erowid, PsychonautWiki [Ref 24]):** Anecdotal user reports characterize 5-MeO-DALT effects as predominantly **physical and stimulating** rather than deeply visual or introspective, distinguishing it from classical psychedelics. Euphoria, sensory enhancement, and mild visual alteration are commonly described; profound visual distortions or perceptual depth are reported as less prominent than with DMT or psilocybin. This is consistent with the high 5-HT₁A affinity (which may buffer 5-HT₂A-mediated visuals) and the drug discrimination data showing DOM-like but not MDMA-like character.
**Effect domains documented (from the effects taxonomy in brief, consistent with literature):**
- *Time:* Time alteration
- *Perception:* Tracers, color enhancement/alteration, symmetrical texture repetition, music enhancement, visual acuity enhancement, visual drifting (generally less intense than classical psychedelics)
- *Feeling:* Emotional enhancement
- *Body:* Stimulation (prominent), spontaneous body sensations, sexual arousal enhancement, pupil dilation, temperature dysregulation, wakefulness, abnormal heartbeat
- *Thinking:* Thought connectivity, novelty enhancement, pattern recognition enhancement, conceptual thinking, thought acceleration, analysis enhancement, memory suppression
### Duration Data
From brief seed data (consistent with Shulgin self-experiment as cited [Ref 2] and case report patterns):
- **Oral:** onset 10–15 min; come-up 15–20 min; peak 60–90 min; offset 1–2 hr; total 2–4 hr
- **Smoked:** onset 15–30 sec; come-up 15–30 sec; peak 1–5 min; offset 5–10 min; total 15–20 min; aftereffects 5–10 min
No contradictions between these values and published literature were found. Shulgin's cited data support the 2–4 hr oral duration. Smoked duration data is based on user reports only; no case report data for smoked administration exists in the published literature.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Lethal Dose
**No published LD₅₀ data in any species.** Toxic dose in humans is unknown [brief seed data confirmed]. The WHO ECDD (2020) [Ref 23] noted that no formal animal lethal dose studies have been published for 5-MeO-DALT.
### Reported Deaths
Corkery et al. (2012) [Ref 4] reported what they described as **the first death involving 5-MeO-DALT** — a man in his mid-20s who died in **mid-2010** in the United Kingdom. The coroner concluded the deceased "died from injuries sustained after being hit by a lorry whilst under the influence of 5-MeO-DALT." This is an **indirect death** (behavioral intoxication leading to fatal trauma), not direct pharmacological fatality.
No directly drug-caused fatalities (cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, etc.) attributable to 5-MeO-DALT alone have been published as of the literature reviewed.
### Case Reports of Adverse Events
**Case 1 — Delirium (Jovel et al. 2014 [Ref 6]):**
A previously healthy young male presented to hospital after ingesting a "standard dose" of 5-MeO-DALT. Symptoms: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis, combativeness. Required physical restraint and intravenous sedation. Standard toxicology screen negative (5-MeO-DALT not detected). Recovery documented. This was the first published clinical case report.
**Case 2 — Acute Delirium + Rhabdomyolysis (Kalasho & Vibe Nielsen 2016 [Ref 7]):**
Case report documenting acute delirium plus rhabdomyolysis in a patient using 5-MeO-DALT. Rhabdomyolysis is a life-threatening complication with risk of acute kidney injury; likely mechanism involves hyperthermia and extreme muscular exertion during agitation.
**Case 3 — Cyclic Myoclonus (Thammongkolchai et al. 2015, Neurology conference abstract [Ref 27]):**
A 29-year-old man (with history of heroin/marijuana use, on buprenorphine) developed markedly reduced oral intake, unresponsiveness, and intermittent myoclonic jerks involving all extremities, trunk, and neck in a cyclic pattern (~every 10 minutes). Brainstem or high spinal cord origin was suspected clinically. IV lorazepam partially effective transiently. EEG showed no ictal/interictal activity; brain MRI unremarkable. Standard urine screen positive only for opioids and cannabinoids. Patient reported 5-MeO-DALT use prior to admission upon recovery; symptoms resolved over one week. **First documented case of myoclonus as a neurological presentation of 5-MeO-DALT.**
**Case 4 — Loss of Consciousness + Visual Hallucinations with Toxicological Confirmation (Dufayet et al. 2022 [Ref 5]):**
A 46-year-old man consumed 3 tablets of 5-MeO-DALT purchased online; each tablet contained approximately 32.5 mg at 11% purity (≈3.6 mg 5-MeO-DALT per tablet; total ≈10.7 mg). Presented with brief loss of consciousness and visual hallucinations. Plasma concentration: 7 ng/mL at 8 hours post-ingestion (confirmed by LC-MS/MS). This is the first case with quantified plasma levels. Not detected by routine toxicological screening. The extreme impurity (11%) highlights the danger of unregulated online product quality.
### Acute Toxidrome Summary
Across all cases, the documented toxidrome includes: extreme agitation, tachycardia, diaphoresis (sweating), combativeness, visual hallucinations, loss of consciousness, myoclonus, rhabdomyolysis, and encephalopathy. Features overlap with sympathomimetic toxidrome and are consistent with serotonin excess, though full serotonin syndrome triad (altered mental status + neuromuscular abnormalities + autonomic instability) was not formally diagnosed in published cases.
### Organ Toxicity
- **Muscular:** Rhabdomyolysis documented [Ref 7]; risk of acute kidney injury
- **Cardiac:** Tachycardia documented; no published reports of arrhythmia or cardiac arrest
- **Renal:** Risk secondary to rhabdomyolysis; no primary nephrotoxicity documented
- **Neurological:** Myoclonus, encephalopathy, delirium documented
### Psychological Risks
No controlled studies. Acute psychosis, delirium, and agitation documented in case reports. Long-term psychological risks unstudied.
---
## Harm Reduction
### Detection Gap
5-MeO-DALT is **not detected by standard immunoassay toxicology screens** [Ref 5, Ref 6]. Specific LC-MS/MS analysis is required. Clinicians treating suspected intoxication must maintain awareness of this gap. Emergency department physicians should consider synthetic tryptamines when patients present with unexplained sympathomimetic/serotonergic toxidrome and negative routine screens [Ref 10, Ref 5].
### Product Purity
Online products have documented extreme impurity: 11% purity was confirmed analytically in one case (Dufayet 2022 [Ref 5]). This means labeled/nominal doses may be dramatically higher than actual drug content, but conversely, users seeking effects may consume far higher quantities to compensate, creating unpredictable exposure.
### Reagent Testing
No published data on colorimetric reagent test responses for 5-MeO-DALT, but tryptamine compounds generally produce color reactions with Ehrlich's reagent (p-DMAB). This has not been formally validated for 5-MeO-DALT in published literature.
### Clinical Management
Based on case reports: IV benzodiazepines (lorazepam) have been used with partial effect for agitation and myoclonus. IV sedation was required in at least one case [Ref 6]. No specific antidote. Supportive care with monitoring for rhabdomyolysis (creatine kinase, renal function) and hyperthermia is indicated.
### MAO Inhibitor Risk
As a tryptamine, 5-MeO-DALT is expected to carry significant risk of serotonin syndrome when combined with MAO inhibitors (MAOIs). While no 5-MeO-DALT + MAOI case has been published, this risk is well-established for the tryptamine class (structural analogy). The compound's O-demethylation and N-dealkylation by CYP enzymes (and potentially MAO) suggest that MAO inhibition could substantially increase plasma levels and serotonergic activity.
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Tolerance
The brief's seed data (buildup: almost immediately after ingestion; half-life: 3 days; full reset: 7 days) is **not confirmed by published substance-specific data**. No human tolerance studies for 5-MeO-DALT have been published.
**Class-level inference:** The mechanism of classical psychedelic tolerance involves 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation with repeated administration. De la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) [Ref 17] demonstrated in mice that DOI-induced HTR tolerance develops rapidly (within 24h of a single dose), involves 5-HT₂A receptor density reduction in frontal cortex, and shows cross-tolerance between psychedelics (DOI↔LSD) but not with non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists. Given 5-MeO-DALT's 5-HT₂A agonism and HTR activity, rapid tolerance development via this mechanism is expected but not directly confirmed.
**WHO ECDD (2020) [Ref 23]:** Anecdotal reports mentioned tolerance development with daily use. No controlled data.
**Cross-tolerance:** Expected with other classical psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT) based on shared 5-HT₂A mechanism.
### Dependence
No evidence of physical dependence or withdrawal syndrome in published literature. WHO ECDD (2020) [Ref 23]: no validated human abuse liability studies; anecdotal reports do not suggest strong compulsive use. The brief's designation of "not habit-forming" is consistent with the class-level evidence.
---
## Interactions
The brief lists the following known interactions. Evidence assessment for each:
**PCP: lethal**
⚠️ FLAG — No published case reports or controlled studies documenting a lethal interaction between 5-MeO-DALT and PCP. PCP inhibits reuptake of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine and is an NMDA receptor antagonist. Combined with 5-MeO-DALT's serotonin receptor agonism, the combination could theoretically cause compounded cardiovascular and CNS toxicity. PCP intoxication independently causes hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and behavioral disturbances with fatality risk. The "lethal" designation in the brief is **not confirmed by published evidence for this specific combination**. This value requires editorial review against its original source.
**Tramadol: dangerous**
**Plausible but unconfirmed substance-specifically.** Tramadol is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and weak mu-opioid agonist. Combined with a direct 5-HT₁A and 5-HT₂A agonist such as 5-MeO-DALT, the risk of **serotonin syndrome** is mechanistically significant. No published case reports of this specific combination were found. The "dangerous" rating is pharmacologically reasonable.
**Cocaine: dangerous**
**Plausible mechanism; unconfirmed substance-specifically.** Cocaine inhibits reuptake of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Combined with 5-MeO-DALT's serotonergic agonism, heightened cardiovascular strain (tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia) is expected. No published case reports specifically for this combination.
**MDMA: unknown**
MDMA releases and prevents reuptake of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine. The drug discrimination data (Gatch 2017 [Ref 9]) showed 5-MeO-DALT does not substitute for MDMA in trained rats, suggesting different dominant mechanisms. However, combined serotonergic effects are a plausible concern. Interaction severity unknown.
**Cannabis: unknown**
No published interaction data.
**Mescaline: unknown**
No published interaction data. Both are serotonin receptor agonists; potential for pharmacodynamic summation of psychedelic effects.
### Serotonin Syndrome Risk Factors
Based on pharmacology: concurrent use with MAOIs, SSRIs, SNRIs, tramadol, triptans, or other serotonergic substances should be considered high-risk. No controlled data.
### CYP Interactions
5-MeO-DALT is metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 [Ref 3]. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers may have elevated plasma levels. Inhibitors of CYP2D6 (e.g., fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion) or CYP3A4 (e.g., azole antifungals, ritonavir) could reduce clearance and potentiate effects. No clinical data.
---
## Legal Status
| Jurisdiction | Status | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| **International (UN 1971 Convention)** | Not scheduled | — | WHO ECDD 43rd meeting (Oct 2020): placed under surveillance; insufficient evidence for international control [Ref 23] |
| **United States (federal)** | Unscheduled | — | Federal Analog Act may apply if used for human consumption as analog of scheduled tryptamines |
| **Florida (US)** | Schedule I | — | State-level controlled |
| **Louisiana (US)** | Schedule I | June 2013 | [Ref 22] |
| **Virginia (US)** | Schedule I | July 1, 2012 | [Ref 22] |
| **United Kingdom** | Class A | January 7, 2015 | Under tryptamine blanket ban [Ref 22] |
| **Sweden** | Controlled | May 1, 2007 | Earliest national control known |
| **China** | Category I psychotropic | September 2010 | [Ref 22] |
| **Japan** | Designated Substance | — | Under Pharmaceutical Affairs Law [Ref 22] |
| **Finland** | Banned | December 2014 | Included in mass-scheduling of 100+ compounds [Ref 22] |
| **Singapore** | Fifth Schedule, MDA | May 2015 | Misuse of Drugs Act [Web-retrieved] |
| **Germany** | Notified to EMCDDA | 2011 | Scheduling status unclear; reported to EMCDDA as an observed NPS |
| **Canada** | Unclear | — | Not explicitly listed in CDSA schedules; may fall under tryptamine analog provisions |
| **Australia** | Unclear | — | No specific scheduling found; status under Poisons Standard unconfirmed |
**EMCDDA reporting history:** First reported by Finland (2007); by 2015, had been reported by 14 EU member states including UK, Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Sweden, Hungary, Denmark, France, Croatia, Cyprus, Italy, Norway.
---
## Clinical Trials
**No registered clinical trials found** on ClinicalTrials.gov for 5-MeO-DALT or any of its synonyms. Search confirmed zero results.
This substance has no approved medical use and has not entered any clinical development pipeline.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
**No community feedback submitted.** The brief's Part A2 section was empty. Standard research directives applied without modification.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### ⚠️ Safety-Critical Flags
1. **PCP interaction labeled "lethal" — unverified.** No published source confirms a lethal interaction between 5-MeO-DALT and PCP specifically. PCP independently causes life-threatening toxicity, and the combination with a serotonergic drug could compound CNS and cardiovascular risk, but the "lethal" designation has no substance-specific evidence base. **Flag for editorial review of source origin.**
2. **LD₅₀ unknown.** No published lethal dose data in any species. The brief's "toxic dose unknown" is confirmed. All dose ranges listed in the brief should be considered unvalidated against controlled safety studies.
3. **Cocaine interaction labeled "dangerous" — not substance-specifically confirmed.** Mechanistic plausibility is high but no published reports specific to 5-MeO-DALT + cocaine exist.
4. **Tramadol interaction "dangerous" — mechanistically plausible but unconfirmed.** Serotonin syndrome risk from combined serotonergic drugs is a real class-level concern but no 5-MeO-DALT + tramadol case has been published.
### ⚠️ Data Discrepancies
5. **5-HT₂A binding affinity discrepancy between sources.** Cozzi & Daley (2016) [Ref 2] reported 5-HT₂A as the weakest 5-HT₂ subtype for the DALT series (Ki 250–730 nM across 5-substituted analogs). Kozell et al. (2023) [Ref 12] / Grokipedia (web-retrieved) report 5-MeO-DALT 5-HT₂A Ki = 48 ± 15 nM. This is a >5-fold discrepancy that may reflect different assay conditions (radioligand, cell system, temperature) or compound-specific values vs. class-range values in Cozzi. The generation agent should use both figures with appropriate caveats; the Kozell 2023 peer-reviewed figure (48 nM) is probably more specifically accurate.
6. **UK scheduling date discrepancy.** Erowid [Ref 22] states Class A since January 7, 2015; Grokipedia (web-retrieved) states June 2014. The Erowid date is the more widely cited and is probably correct; the tryptamine blanket ban came into effect January 2015. Flag if precision is needed.
### Data Gaps
7. **No human pharmacokinetic data.** Only one plasma concentration datapoint from a case report (7 ng/mL at 8h). Tmax, Cmax, AUC, elimination half-life, and bioavailability are unknown.
8. **No smoked administration case reports or controlled data.** Smoked route dose and duration data are based on user reports only.
9. **No published melting point from a peer-reviewed journal.** Melting point data (105.1°C freebase; 160.3°C HCl) comes from the SWGDRUG monograph [Ref 26], which is a technical reference standard rather than a peer-reviewed study.
10. **Australia and Canada legal status unconfirmed.** Could not find definitive scheduling information for either country.
11. **MAOI interaction risk not substance-specifically studied.** Treated as high-risk by class inference only.
12. **No published SMILES from PubChem returned** in this research run (PubChem API returned formula/weight/InChIKey but not SMILES string). SMILES can be obtained directly from PubChem CID 50878551.
13. **Street name variation.** The brief lists "Foxtrot" as the street name. PsychonautWiki appears to use "Foxtrol." Web searches confirm "Foxtrot" is the more common form, associated with the fumarate salt marketed under that name. The brief value ("Foxtrot") appears correct.
14. **Physical property data for smoked route.** No published data on pyrolysis products or smoke composition of 5-MeO-DALT. Safety implications of smoked administration (aside from general risks of inhalation) are unknown.
15. **Thammongkolchai et al. (2015)** was presented as a Neurology conference abstract [Ref 27]. While 43 citations in OpenAlex suggest scientific visibility, its conference abstract status means it should be treated as moderate quality evidence; the findings have not been published in a full peer-reviewed case report.