2C-T-7
2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylthiophenethylamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 3 mg | 3 mg | medium |
| Low | 5–15 mg | 5–15 mg | medium |
| Common | 15–25 mg | 15–25 mg | medium |
| Strong | 25–40 mg | 25–40 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 40+ mg | 40+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | PiHKAL records 10-30 mg oral as active range. Shulgin found 2-4 mg inactive, suggesting threshold ~3-5 mg. Hardison survey reports 25-45 mg among experienced users. DB seed values (threshold 3, common 15-25, strong 25-40, heavy >40) are consistent with these sources. No controlled dose-finding study exists. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL records 10-30 mg oral as active range. Shulgin found 2-4 mg inactive, suggesting threshold ~3-5 mg. Hardison survey reports 25-45 mg among experienced users. DB seed values (threshold 3, common 15-25, strong 25-40, heavy >40) are consistent with these sources. No controlled dose-finding study exists. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
insufflatedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 1 mg | 1 mg | low |
| Low | 2–5 mg | 2–5 mg | low |
| Common | 5–15 mg | 5–15 mg | low |
| Strong | 15–25 mg | 15–25 mg | low |
| Heavy | 25+ mg | 25+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated dose ranges from community-curated database. No published pharmacokinetic data to confirm bioavailability ratio. All three documented fatalities involved insufflated doses ≥30 mg. This ROA is associated with significantly elevated risk and all harm reduction guidance recommends oral administration instead. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated dose ranges from community-curated database. No published pharmacokinetic data to confirm bioavailability ratio. All three documented fatalities involved insufflated doses ≥30 mg. This ROA is associated with significantly elevated risk and all harm reduction guidance recommends oral administration instead. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 30–90 minutes | 30–90 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Hardison survey reports onset at 1-2 hours; community reports commonly cite 30-90 minutes for first alerts. PiHKAL does not specify onset separately. | ||
ReasoningReasoningHardison survey reports onset at 1-2 hours; community reports commonly cite 30-90 minutes for first alerts. PiHKAL does not specify onset separately. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Community reports describe a gradual build from first alerts to approaching peak over 45-90 minutes. Nausea peaks during this phase. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity reports describe a gradual build from first alerts to approaching peak over 45-90 minutes. Nausea peaks during this phase. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Hardison survey documents peak at 2-4 hours post-ingestion; consistent with PiHKAL's implied peak window within the 8-15 hour total. | ||
ReasoningReasoningHardison survey documents peak at 2-4 hours post-ingestion; consistent with PiHKAL's implied peak window within the 8-15 hour total. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 3–6 hours | 3–6 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Derived from total duration (8-15 hours per PiHKAL/Hardison) minus onset+come_up+peak phases. The prolonged offset is consistent with the thiopropyl group's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDerived from total duration (8-15 hours per PiHKAL/Hardison) minus onset+come_up+peak phases. The prolonged offset is consistent with the thiopropyl group's lipophilicity. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 8–15 hours | 8–15 hours | medium |
| Editorial | PiHKAL records 8-15 hours. Hardison survey confirms 8-12 hours. Using the broader PiHKAL range as it represents the complete range of reported durations. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL records 8-15 hours. Hardison survey confirms 8-12 hours. Using the broader PiHKAL range as it represents the complete range of reported durations. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 4–12 hours | 4–12 hours | low |
| Editorial | No published data on aftereffects duration. Community reports suggest residual mood effects and fatigue for several hours after primary effects end. Estimate based on class-typical afterglow for long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published data on aftereffects duration. Community reports suggest residual mood effects and fatigue for several hours after primary effects end. Estimate based on class-typical afterglow for long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1–10 minutes | 1–10 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community reports indicate near-immediate onset via insufflation. Intense nasal burning pain is universally reported and may precede or coincide with psychoactive onset. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity reports indicate near-immediate onset via insufflation. Intense nasal burning pain is universally reported and may precede or coincide with psychoactive onset. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Come uptrace | 10–30 minutes | 10–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Rapid escalation reported via insufflation. Community reports describe reaching near-peak within 15-30 minutes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningRapid escalation reported via insufflation. Community reports describe reaching near-peak within 15-30 minutes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Peaktrace | 1.5–3 hours | 1.5–3 hours | low |
| Editorial | Shorter peak than oral route, estimated from community reports describing a compressed but more intense experience. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShorter peak than oral route, estimated from community reports describing a compressed but more intense experience. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Offsettrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from community reports of shorter total insufflated duration (approximately 5-8 hours total) minus onset and peak phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from community reports of shorter total insufflated duration (approximately 5-8 hours total) minus onset and peak phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Totaltrace | 5–8 hours | 5–8 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community reports suggest insufflated duration is shorter than oral (roughly 5-8 hours vs. 8-15 hours). No controlled comparison data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity reports suggest insufflated duration is shorter than oral (roughly 5-8 hours vs. 8-15 hours). No controlled comparison data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–8 hours | 2–8 hours | low |
| Editorial | Estimated. Nasal soreness and residual cognitive fog may persist. No published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated. Nasal soreness and residual cognitive fog may persist. No published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Chronic | low | low | medium |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, neurological | cardiovascular, neurological | medium |
| Editorial | Classified as moderate acute (not high): the three documented deaths all involved confounding factors (insufflation at ≥30 mg, polydrug use). No mono-intoxication oral deaths reported. In vitro neurotoxicity data from Gil-Martins et al. 2024 at supra-pharmacological concentrations. Chronic rated low: no chronic toxicity data exist; in vitro oxidative stress findings at extreme concentrations do not confirm in vivo chronic organ damage. Evidence discount applied for absence of controlled human data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClassified as moderate acute (not high): the three documented deaths all involved confounding factors (insufflation at ≥30 mg, polydrug use). No mono-intoxication oral deaths reported. In vitro neurotoxicity data from Gil-Martins et al. 2024 at supra-pharmacological concentrations. Chronic rated low: no chronic toxicity data exist; in vitro oxidative stress findings at extreme concentrations do not confirm in vivo chronic organ damage. Evidence discount applied for absence of controlled human data. Evidence basis: published_case_series | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | low |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | low |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | low |
| Editorial | No substance-specific abuse potential or dependence studies for 2C-T-7. Profile inferred from serotonergic psychedelic class properties and receptor binding data showing no monoamine transporter activity (Luethi et al. 2018). Rapid tolerance (Smith et al. 2014) further supports low dependence potential. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo substance-specific abuse potential or dependence studies for 2C-T-7. Profile inferred from serotonergic psychedelic class properties and receptor binding data showing no monoamine transporter activity (Luethi et al. 2018). Rapid tolerance (Smith et al. 2014) further supports low dependence potential. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | low |
| Symptoms | — | — | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. No substance-specific data for 2C-T-7. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. No substance-specific data for 2C-T-7. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | medium |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | DOI, 2C-B, mescaline, LSD, psilocybin | DOI, 2C-B, mescaline, LSD, psilocybin | medium |
| Editorial | Tolerance mechanism confirmed by Smith et al. 2014 in mouse HTR assay. Cross-tolerance with DOI demonstrated as insurmountable. Timeline values (3-day half-life, 7-day reset) from community consensus only — not published experimental data. Confidence medium for mechanism, low for specific timeline values. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance mechanism confirmed by Smith et al. 2014 in mouse HTR assay. Cross-tolerance with DOI demonstrated as insurmountable. Timeline values (3-day half-life, 7-day reset) from community consensus only — not published experimental data. Confidence medium for mechanism, low for specific timeline values. Evidence basis: animal_study | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| neurological epilepsytrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | One documented death involved seizures (DEA brief, Platoni 2002). MAO inhibition may lower seizure threshold. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOne documented death involved seizures (DEA brief, Platoni 2002). MAO inhibition may lower seizure threshold. | |||
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics based on 5-HT₂A mechanism. Schifano et al. 2005 notes paranoid ideation as an adverse effect of 2C-T-7. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics based on 5-HT₂A mechanism. Schifano et al. 2005 notes paranoid ideation as an adverse effect of 2C-T-7. | |||
| psychiatric bipolar disordertrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level psychedelic contraindication. Lithium + serotonergic psychedelic interaction documented at class level. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level psychedelic contraindication. Lithium + serotonergic psychedelic interaction documented at class level. | |||
| cardiovascular cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Community reports document tachycardia and hypertension. One fatality involved cerebral hemorrhage. MAO inhibition (Wagmann et al. 2019) may elevate catecholamine levels. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity reports document tachycardia and hypertension. One fatality involved cerebral hemorrhage. MAO inhibition (Wagmann et al. 2019) may elevate catecholamine levels. | |||
| other MAO inhibitor medicationstrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Theobald and Maurer 2007 confirm MAO-A/B as primary metabolic enzymes. Wagmann et al. 2019 document MAO inhibitory activity. Strong mechanistic basis. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTheobald and Maurer 2007 confirm MAO-A/B as primary metabolic enzymes. Wagmann et al. 2019 document MAO inhibitory activity. Strong mechanistic basis. | |||
| other MDMAtrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Two of three documented US deaths involved MDMA co-ingestion (DEA brief, Platoni 2002). Strong mechanistic basis for serotonergic synergy. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTwo of three documented US deaths involved MDMA co-ingestion (DEA brief, Platoni 2002). Strong mechanistic basis for serotonergic synergy. | |||
| other serotonergic medicationstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Schifano et al. 2021 systematic review documents NPS-associated serotonin syndrome. 2C-T-7 MAO inhibition elevates risk beyond typical psychedelic-SSRI interactions. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSchifano et al. 2021 systematic review documents NPS-associated serotonin syndrome. 2C-T-7 MAO inhibition elevates risk beyond typical psychedelic-SSRI interactions. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | No safety data. Standard absolute contraindication for novel psychoactive substances without reproductive toxicology data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo safety data. Standard absolute contraindication for novel psychoactive substances without reproductive toxicology data. | |||
| hepatic hepatic impairmenttrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Theobald and Maurer 2007 identify CYP2D6 as a minor metabolic contributor. No clinical PK data in hepatic impairment. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTheobald and Maurer 2007 identify CYP2D6 as a minor metabolic contributor. No clinical PK data in hepatic impairment. | |||
| age adolescencetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | One documented fatality involved a 17-year-old (Platoni 2002). No adolescent safety data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOne documented fatality involved a 17-year-old (Platoni 2002). No adolescent safety data. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
| Come uptrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.30) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.30) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
| Peaktrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=1.00) | 7200–14400 sec(i=1.00) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
| Plateautrace | 7200–10800 sec(i=0.55) | 7200–10800 sec(i=0.55) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.20) | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.20) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 14400–43200 sec(i=0.05) | 14400–43200 sec(i=0.05) | medium |
| Editorial | Timeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline derived from PiHKAL (8\u201315 hours total, onset not explicitly stated) and Hardison survey (onset 1\u20132 hours, peak 2\u20134 hours, duration 8\u201312 hours). No controlled PK data exist. Phase durations estimated from community consensus with pharmacological reasoning for the prolonged plateau consistent with the thiopropyl substituent's lipophilicity. | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 60–600 sec(i=0.10) | 60–600 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
| Come uptrace | 600–1800 sec(i=0.45) | 600–1800 sec(i=0.45) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
| Peaktrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=1.00) | 5400–10800 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
| Plateautrace | 5400–7200 sec(i=0.50) | 5400–7200 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.20) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–28800 sec(i=0.05) | 7200–28800 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated timeline inferred from Erowid community reports noting faster onset, shorter total duration, and more intense peak. All three documented fatalities involved insufflation. No controlled data. Phase durations are estimates based on community reports; confidence is low due to the inherent danger of this ROA and sparse systematic data. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold oral doses (~3–5 mg), effects are subtle and easily dismissed: mild mood brightening, slight colour enhancement, and a gentle sense of heightened sensory awareness. Some users report a faint body tingling or warmth without clear perceptual alteration. Physically, mild pupil dilation may be noticeable to an observer. No significant body load, nausea, or cardiovascular effects are expected at this range. The long onset (60–120 minutes) means threshold effects may take over an hour to become apparent, complicating dose assessment.
Threshold value of ~3 mg from community-curated database; PiHKAL reports 2–4 mg as inactive, suggesting threshold sits just above this. No controlled data.
ReasoningReasoning
Threshold value of ~3 mg from community-curated database; PiHKAL reports 2–4 mg as inactive, suggesting threshold sits just above this. No controlled data.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At light oral doses (5–15 mg), perceptual shifts become identifiable: enhanced colour saturation, mild visual brightening, gentle geometric patterning on textured surfaces, and subtle time distortion. Mood elevation and increased sociability emerge. Thought connectivity increases, with a mildly introspective quality that distinguishes the 2C-T experience from purely visual psychedelics. Mild nausea may appear during the come-up phase. A slight body load — described as stimulatory tension rather than sedation — is common. The experience lasts 6–10 hours at this range, shorter than at higher doses but still a significant time commitment.
PiHKAL records active dose range beginning at 10 mg. The 5–15 mg light range is inferred from PiHKAL lower bound and community reports. No controlled dose-response data.
ReasoningReasoning
PiHKAL records active dose range beginning at 10 mg. The 5–15 mg light range is inferred from PiHKAL lower bound and community reports. No controlled dose-response data.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At common oral doses (15–25 mg), the full psychedelic experience manifests: pronounced colour enhancement and saturation, geometric visual patterning overlaying surfaces, drifting and morphing of objects, and closed-eye visuals with intricate detail. Empathogenic and prosocial effects become prominent — a quality Shulgin specifically noted as distinguishing 2C-T-7 from other phenethylamines. Thought connectivity and introspection deepen, with a reported "crystalline" clarity. Nausea is one of the most common adverse effects at this range, typically peaking during the come-up (1–2 hours post-ingestion). Muscle tension, jaw clenching, and stimulatory cardiovascular effects (increased heart rate, mild blood pressure elevation) are frequently reported. Duration is 8–12 hours; sleep is unlikely for the first 10–12 hours.
PiHKAL reports 10–30 mg as active range with duration 8–15 hours. Hardison survey documents 25–45 mg doses in experienced users with 8–12 hour duration. The 15–25 mg common range represents the overlap of PiHKAL's mid-range and community consensus.
ReasoningReasoning
PiHKAL reports 10–30 mg as active range with duration 8–15 hours. Hardison survey documents 25–45 mg doses in experienced users with 8–12 hour duration. The 15–25 mg common range represents the overlap of PiHKAL's mid-range and community consensus.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At strong oral doses (25–40 mg), visual intensity escalates significantly: complex geometric patterning dominates the visual field, objects undergo substantial morphing and drifting, colour saturation reaches vivid extremes, and closed-eye imagery may become immersive and narrative. Ego softening or partial ego dissolution may occur. Emotional responses intensify dramatically — both positive (euphoria, profound empathy, spiritual feelings) and negative (anxiety, paranoid ideation) states become more likely. Body load increases: nausea and vomiting become more frequent, muscle tension is pronounced, and cardiovascular stimulation is more noticeable. Temperature dysregulation may occur. Duration extends to 10–15 hours. The prolonged timeline combined with high intensity demands careful attention to set and setting.
Hardison survey reports 25–45 mg as the common range among experienced users, with PiHKAL's upper bound at 30 mg. Schifano et al. and Erowid document anxiety and panic at higher doses. The 25–40 mg strong range reflects the upper community-reported range.
ReasoningReasoning
Hardison survey reports 25–45 mg as the common range among experienced users, with PiHKAL's upper bound at 30 mg. Schifano et al. and Erowid document anxiety and panic at higher doses. The 25–40 mg strong range reflects the upper community-reported range.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At heavy oral doses (>40 mg), the experience becomes intensely overwhelming: visual field may be completely dominated by hallucinatory content, reality testing is severely compromised, and full ego dissolution is possible. Unpleasant dissociative states, paranoid ideation, and acute psychological crisis become substantially more likely. The empathogenic quality reported at lower doses may give way to confusion and disorientation. Physical adverse effects escalate: severe nausea and vomiting, pronounced tachycardia, hypertension, muscle rigidity, and significant temperature dysregulation. Duration may extend to 15+ hours. At these doses, the margin between intense experience and medical emergency narrows — particularly given 2C-T-7's MAO inhibitory activity, which may elevate monoamine levels unpredictably.
Doses above 40 mg exceed the ranges documented in PiHKAL (10–30 mg) and approach the upper bound of Hardison survey reports (45 mg). No controlled data exist at this range. Safety concerns extrapolated from documented fatalities at insufflated doses ≥30 mg and community adverse event reports.
ReasoningReasoning
Doses above 40 mg exceed the ranges documented in PiHKAL (10–30 mg) and approach the upper bound of Hardison survey reports (45 mg). No controlled data exist at this range. Safety concerns extrapolated from documented fatalities at insufflated doses ≥30 mg and community adverse event reports.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateDiscriminative stimulus effects of 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane in rhesus monkeys: antagonism and apparent pA2 analyses.Li JX, Rice KC, France CP · 2009 · Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics
- [2]moderateDiscriminative stimulus effects of 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane in rhesus monkeysLi JX, Rice KC, France CP · 2008 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 179936053 claims checked1 verified2 inconclusive
- [3]moderateDifferential effects of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of the 5-HT2A receptor agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane in rats and rhesus monkeys.Li JX, Koek W, Rice KC, France CP · 2010 · Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics
- [4]moderateNew trends in the cyber and street market of recreational drugs? The case of 2C-T-7 ('Blue Mystic')Schifano F, Deluca P, Agosti L, Martinotti G, Corkery JM, et al. · 2005 · Journal of Psychopharmacologypubmed 162721919 claims checked4 verified3 partial2 inconclusive
- [5]weak2C-T-7: DEA Drug and Chemical InformationDrug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division · 2004linkno claims checked
- [6]weakSchedules of Controlled Substances; Placement of 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine and N-Benzylpiperazine Into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances ActDrug Enforcement Administration · 2004linkno claims checked
- [7]weakAn Amateur Qualitative Study of 48 2C-T-7 Subjective BioassaysHardison C · 2000linkno claims checked
- [8]moderateTolerance and cross-tolerance to head twitch behavior elicited by phenethylamine- and tryptamine-derived hallucinogens in mice.Smith DA, Bailey JM, Williams D, Fantegrossi WE · 2014 · The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics
- [9]moderateInteractions of phenethylamine-derived psychoactive substances of the 2C-series with human monoamine oxidasesWagmann L, Brandt SD, Stratford A, Maurer HH, Meyer MR · 2019 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [10]moderateIdentification of monoamine oxidase and cytochrome P450 isoenzymes involved in the deamination of phenethylamine-derived designer drugs (2C-series)Theobald DS, Maurer HH · 2007 · Biochemical Pharmacology
- [11]moderateMonoamine receptor interaction profiles of 4-thio-substituted phenethylamines (2C-T drugs)Luethi D, Trachsel D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2018 · Neuropharmacology
- [12]weak
- [13]moderateNew phenethylamines in EuropeKing LA · 2014 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [14]weakSchedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine Into Schedule IDrug Enforcement Administration · 2002linkno claims checked
- [15]weakReport on the risk assessment of 2C-I, 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 in the framework of the Joint Action on new synthetic drugsEMCDDA Scientific Committee · 2003linkno claims checked
- [16]weakCouncil Decision 2003/847/JHA on control measures for 2C-I, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7 and TMA-2Council of the European Union · 2003linkno claims checked
- [17]weak
- [18]moderateStructure-Activity Assessment and In-Depth Analysis of Biased Agonism in a Set of Phenylalkylamine 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists.Pottie E, Poulie CBM, Simon IA, et al. · 2023 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [19]strongThe 4-alkyl chain length of 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamines differentially affects in vitro serotonin receptor actions versus in vivo psychedelic-like effectsLuethi D et al. · 2026 · Molecular Psychiatry
- [20]moderateHallucinogen-like actions of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine (2C-T-7) in mice and ratsFantegrossi WE, Harrington AW, Eckler JR, Arshad S, Rabin RA, Winter JC, Coop A, Rice KC, Woods JH · 2005 · Psychopharmacologypubmed 159837861 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [21]moderateUse of the head-twitch response to investigate the structure-activity relationships of 4-thio-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenylalkylaminesHalberstadt AL, Luethi D, Hoener MC, Trachsel D, Brandt SD, Liechti ME · 2023 · Psychopharmacology
- [22]moderateFunctional selectivity of hallucinogenic phenethylamine and phenylisopropylamine derivatives at human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C receptorsMoya PR, Berg KA, Gutierrez-Hernandez MA, Saez-Briones P, Reyes-Parada M, Cassels BK, Clarke WP · 2007 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 173376332 claims checked2 verified
- [23]moderateNew designer drug, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylthio-beta-phenethylamine (2C-T-7): studies on its metabolism and toxicological detection in rat urine using gas chromatography/mass spectrometryTheobald DS, Fehn S, Maurer HH · 2005 · Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- [24]moderateUrinary Excretion Profiles of 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-alkylthiophenethylamine Analogs in RatsKanamori T, Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, Iwata YT, Inoue H · 2016 · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
- [25]moderatePhenethylamine-derived new psychoactive substances 2C-E-FLY, 2C-EF-FLY, and 2C-T-7-FLY: Investigations on their metabolic fate including isoenzyme activities and their toxicological detectability in urine screeningsWagmann L, Hempel N, Richter LHJ, Brandt SD, Stratford A, Meyer MR · 2019 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [26]moderateA general screening and confirmation approach to the analysis of designer tryptamines and phenethylamines in blood and urine using GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS.Vorce SP, Sklerov JH · 2004 · Journal of analytical toxicologypubmed 155162871 claim checked1 verified
- [27]strongNew psychoactive substances (NPS) and serotonin syndrome onset: A systematic review.Schifano F, Chiappini S, Miuli A, Corkery JM, Scherbaum N, Napoletano F, Arillotta D, Zangani C, Catalani V, Vento A, Pettorruso M, Martinotti G, Massimo DG, Guirguis A · 2021 · Experimental neurology
- [28]moderateAnalysis of 2,5-dimethoxy-amphetamines and 2,5-dimethoxy-phenethylamines aiming their determination in biological matrices: a review.Nieddu M, Baralla E, Sodano F, Boatto G · 2023 · Forensic Toxicology
- [29]moderateMechanistic Insights into the Neurotoxicity of 2,5-Dimethoxyphenethylamines (2C) and Corresponding N-(2-methoxybenzyl)phenethylamine (NBOMe) DrugsGil-Martins E, Cagide-Fagin F, Martins D, Borer A, Barbosa DJ, Fernandes C, Chavarria D, Remiao F, Borges F, Silva R · 2024 · Journal of Xenobiotics
- [30]moderateReceptor interaction profiles of novel N-2-methoxybenzyl (NBOMe) derivatives of 2,5-dimethoxy-substituted phenethylamines (2C drugs)Rickli A, Luethi D, Reinisch J, Buchy D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2015 · Neuropharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary8 claims4verified1partial3inconclusive
partialBrief recreational circulation in 2000–2001 produced three associated fatalities in the United States, prompting DEA temporary Schedule I placement in September 2002 and permanent scheduling in March 2004.[4]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly states 'one death from mono-intoxication documented in USA,' directly contradicting the claim of three fatalities. DEA scheduling dates are not addressed in the abstract.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified2C-T-7 acts as a partial agonist at 5-HT₂A receptors with class-range Ki of 1–54 nM[11]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms: '5-HT2A Ki 1-54 nM' and 'partial agonists at 5-HT2A/2B.'
5-HT2A Ki 1-54 nM... partial agonists at 5-HT2A/2B
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis in rhesus monkeys yielded pA₂ values of ~8.58–8.61 for the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907, confirming 5-HT₂A as the primary site mediating hallucinogenic discriminative stimulus effects[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms Schild analysis and predominant 5-HT2A role for 2C-T-7 in rhesus monkeys, but the specific pA₂ values (8.58–8.61) are not stated in the abstract — these would be in the full text/tables.
Schild analysis confirms predominant 5-HT2A receptor role for DOM, 2C-T-7, and DPT discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis in rhesus monkeys yielded pA₂ values of ~8.58–8.61 for the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907, confirming 5-HT₂A as the primary site mediating hallucinogenic discriminative stimulus effects[2]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A receptor mediation for 2C-T-7 but contains no mention of Schild analysis or specific pA₂ values.
2C-T-7 occasions DOM-lever responding in rhesus monkeys; effect blocked by 5-HT2A antagonists. Confirms 5-HT2A receptor mediation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis in rhesus monkeys yielded pA₂ values of ~8.58–8.61 for the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907, confirming 5-HT₂A as the primary site mediating hallucinogenic discriminative stimulus effects[3]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A mechanism for 2C-T-7 but does not mention Schild analysis or pA₂ values.
2C-T-7 occasions DOM-associated lever responding and enhances DOM discriminative stimulus effects additively in rats and monkeys. Confirms 5-HT2A mechanism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedSecondary activity includes partial agonism at 5-HT₂C, agonism at rat TAAR1 (not human TAAR1), and MAO-A/MAO-B inhibition at micromolar concentrations.[9]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition at micromolar concentrations (IC50 10–125 µM and 1.7–180 µM). This citation backs the MAO portion of the compound claim.
IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe compound's dual action as a 5-HT₂A agonist and MAO inhibitor creates a pronounced serotonin syndrome risk when combined with serotonergic agents[9]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO-A/B inhibition by 2C-T-7, which establishes the pharmacological basis for serotonin syndrome risk when combined with serotonergic agents. This is a well-supported mechanistic inference.
17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe compound's dual action as a 5-HT₂A agonist and MAO inhibitor creates a pronounced serotonin syndrome risk when combined with serotonergic agents[10]model confidence 92%
Abstract explicitly notes 2C-series compounds are 'likely susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors,' directly supporting the serotonin syndrome risk claim.
2Cs likely susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
history5 claims1verified1partial3inconclusive
verifiedPeer-reviewed review confirmed one death related to mono-intoxication with 2C-T-7 in the United States and noted very low street-level availability in the European Union at that time.[4]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms both specific facts: one mono-intoxication death in USA and low street availability in the EU.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA. Low street availability in EU.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveStreet names included "Beautiful," "Blue Mystic," "T7," "Tripstay," and "Tweety-Bird Mescaline"[4]model confidence 78%
Abstract (and paper title) confirms 'Blue Mystic' as a street name but does not enumerate the full list of street names. The complete list would be in the paper body.
The case of 2C-T-7 ('Blue Mystic')
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThree deaths associated with 2C-T-7 occurred in the United States between late 2000 and April 2001, precipitating regulatory action:[13]model confidence 85%
Abstract covers EU regulatory context (EMCDDA risk assessment) and does not mention US fatalities, their number, or dates.
Review of ~100 illicit phenethylamines found in EU by 2013.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialThree deaths associated with 2C-T-7 occurred in the United States between late 2000 and April 2001, precipitating regulatory action:[4]model confidence 95%
Abstract documents only one death from mono-intoxication in the USA, directly contradicting the claim of three deaths.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveNo deaths from oral use at conventional doses without co-intoxicants have been reported in the peer-reviewed literature.{{/Warning}}[4]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms one mono-intoxication death in the USA but does not specify route of administration or dose level. The claim requires details about route and dose specificity that are not in the abstract.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
chemistry2 claims1verified1inconclusive
verifiedThe 4-thioalkyl substitution pattern was systematically explored by Shulgin, who found the propyl chain length optimal for psychoactive potency — a finding later confirmed by receptor binding studies showing that propyl analogs achieve the highest 5-HT₂A activation potencies (1–9 nM range) within the 4-alkyl-2,5-dimethoxy series.[19]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms the propyl chain produces the highest 5-HT2A potencies (1-9 nM range) among the alkyl series, validating the receptor binding confirmation half of the claim.
4-propyl analog produced highest potencies at 5-HT2A (1-9 nM)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe sulfur atom introduces substantial lipophilicity relative to oxygen- or halogen-substituted analogs (e.g., 2c-b), influencing both receptor binding characteristics and metabolic fate.[18]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms lipophilicity correlates with efficacy in 2C-X phenethylamines at 5-HT2A but does not specifically compare sulfur vs. oxygen/halogen substituents or address metabolic fate.
Lipophilicity of 2C-X phenethylamines correlates with efficacy
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacology13 claims9verified4inconclusive
verifiedCYP2D6 contributes to a minor extent; other cytochrome P450 isoforms play negligible roles.[10]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly states: 'CYP2D6 also involved but to small extent,' consistent with negligible roles for other CYP isoforms.
MAO-A and MAO-B are major enzymes for deamination of 2C-T-7. CYP2D6 also involved but to small extent.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe metabolic fate of 2C-T-7 has been characterized in rat urine:[23]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly describes metabolism of 2C-T-7 in rat urine using GC/MS, confirming the study exists and has characterized metabolic fate.
Metabolism of 2C-T-7 in rat urine by GC/MS.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTolerance develops rapidly through 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation, with bidirectional cross-tolerance to other phenethylamine hallucinogens demonstrated in mice[8]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms tolerance to 2C-T-7 HTR and cross-tolerance between DOI and 2C-T-7 in mice. The 5-HT₂A downregulation mechanism and bidirectionality are reasonable inferences from shared receptor mechanism data.
Tolerance develops to daily 2C-T-7 HTR in mice. DOI-tolerant mice showed insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis using the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907 yielded virtually identical pA₂ values (~8.58–8.61) whether tested against DOM, 2C-T-7, or DPT, providing quantitative receptor-level evidence that 2C-T-7's discriminative stimulus effects are 5-HT₂A-mediated[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms Schild analysis and 5-HT2A role for all three compounds in rhesus monkeys but does not report the specific pA₂ values (~8.58–8.61) cited in the claim.
Schild analysis confirms predominant 5-HT2A receptor role for DOM, 2C-T-7, and DPT discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis using the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907 yielded virtually identical pA₂ values (~8.58–8.61) whether tested against DOM, 2C-T-7, or DPT, providing quantitative receptor-level evidence that 2C-T-7's discriminative stimulus effects are 5-HT₂A-mediated[2]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A receptor mediation for 2C-T-7 but contains no mention of Schild analysis or pA₂ values.
2C-T-7 occasions DOM-lever responding in rhesus monkeys; effect blocked by 5-HT2A antagonists.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSchild analysis using the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist MDL100907 yielded virtually identical pA₂ values (~8.58–8.61) whether tested against DOM, 2C-T-7, or DPT, providing quantitative receptor-level evidence that 2C-T-7's discriminative stimulus effects are 5-HT₂A-mediated[3]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A mechanism for 2C-T-7 but does not mention Schild analysis or any pA₂ values.
Confirms 5-HT2A mechanism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveIn the head-twitch response (HTR) assay — a validated behavioural proxy for 5-HT₂A agonism — 2C-T-7 produces robust responses in both mice and rats.[20]model confidence 78%
Abstract notes the paper examines 'hallucinogen-like actions in rodents' but does not explicitly mention the HTR assay or confirm 'robust responses.' The specific data would be in the full text.
One of few direct in vivo studies of 2C-T-7. Examines hallucinogen-like actions in rodents.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedIn the head-twitch response (HTR) assay — a validated behavioural proxy for 5-HT₂A agonism — 2C-T-7 produces robust responses in both mice and rats.[21]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms use of the HTR assay with 2C-T-7 and supports classification as a psychedelic acting at 5-HT2A receptors.
SAR study of 4-thio-substituted phenylalkylamines including 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 using HTR assay. Findings support classification of 2C-T compounds as psychedelic drugs acting at 5-HT2A receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPhenylisopropylamines (the amphetamine homologs) demonstrate greater efficacy than their phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT₂A.[22]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly states: 'Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A.'
Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTesting of 17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 using heterologously expressed enzymes yielded class-range IC₅₀ values of 10–125 µM for MAO-A (7 compounds with determinable IC₅₀) and 1.7–180 µM for MAO-B (9 compounds with determinable IC₅₀)[9]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms 17 2C-series drugs tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition with IC50 values matching exactly: MAO-A 10–125 µM, MAO-B 1.7–180 µM.
17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThis dual mechanism (5-HT₂A agonism combined with MAO inhibition) creates a serotonin syndrome risk profile not shared by all psychedelic phenethylamines.{{/Warning}}[9]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO inhibition in 17 2C-series drugs with variable IC50 values, implying differential risk across the class. Serves as the pharmacological basis for the dual-mechanism risk claim.
17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal urinary metabolite in rat is β-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide — a profile distinct from 2c-t-2 (N-acetylated-sulfoxide) and 2C-T-4 (S-methylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide), demonstrating metabolite specificity within the 2C-T series despite shared structural features.[24]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms the principal metabolite for 2C-T-7 in rat urine. The same paper studied all three compounds so comparative metabolite profiles would be in the full text.
For 2C-T-7, principal metabolite was beta-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedFor the structurally related 2C-T-7-FLY (a rigidified analog), the principal metabolic transformations are hydroxylation and N-acetylation, with CYP2D6, CYP3A4, FMO3, and NAT1/NAT2 identified as participating enzymes[25]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all cited enzymes (CYP2D6, CYP3A4, FMO3, NAT1/NAT2) and main metabolic steps (hydroxylation and N-acetylation) for 2C-T-7-FLY.
Main metabolic steps: hydroxylation and N-acetylation. CYP2D6, 3A4, FMO3 and NAT1/NAT2 involved.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
receptor pharmacology4 claims3verified1inconclusive
verifiedThe primary in vitro receptor characterization of the 2C-T drug class comes from Luethi and colleagues, who profiled 4-thio-substituted phenethylamines including 2C-T-7 across multiple receptor targets:[11]model confidence 98%
Abstract confirms comprehensive profiling of 4-thio-substituted phenethylamines (2C-T drugs) across multiple receptor targets including 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, TAAR1, and alpha receptors.
4-Thio-substituted phenethylamines (2C-T drugs) are potent psychedelics. Characterized monoamine receptor and transporter interaction profiles.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusive2C-T drugs bind rat TAAR1 with high affinity (Ki 5–68 nM range) but interact minimally with human TAAR1[11]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms rat TAAR1 Ki 5–68 nM but makes no mention of human TAAR1 activity. The claim's key qualifier ('minimal human TAAR1 interaction') is not verifiable from the abstract.
rat TAAR1 5-68 nM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAmong 2C-X phenethylamines, lipophilicity correlates with efficacy in both β-arrestin2 and miniGα_q recruitment assays at 5-HT₂A[18]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms the correlation between lipophilicity and efficacy in beta-arrestin2 and miniGalphaq recruitment assays for 2C-X phenethylamines.
beta-arrestin2 vs miniGalphaq recruitment. Lipophilicity of 2C-X phenethylamines correlates with efficacy
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedExtension beyond propyl reduces in vivo potency, partly attributable to pharmacokinetic limitations rather than receptor affinity alone.[19]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly states: 'extending chain beyond propyl reduces in vivo potency partly due to pharmacokinetic parameters.'
extending chain beyond propyl reduces in vivo potency partly due to pharmacokinetic parameters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
neuroscience5 claims5verified
verifiedBased on its confirmed 5-HT₂A agonism, the following neural mechanisms are inferred from the broader serotonergic psychedelic literature.[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A agonism for 2C-T-7 via Schild analysis, establishing the confirmed agonism from which neural mechanisms are inferred.
Schild analysis confirms predominant 5-HT2A receptor role for DOM, 2C-T-7, and DPT discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedBased on its confirmed 5-HT₂A agonism, the following neural mechanisms are inferred from the broader serotonergic psychedelic literature.[2]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A receptor mediation for 2C-T-7, providing the confirmed agonism basis for the inference.
Confirms 5-HT2A receptor mediation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedBased on its confirmed 5-HT₂A agonism, the following neural mechanisms are inferred from the broader serotonergic psychedelic literature.[3]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A mechanism for 2C-T-7, supporting the stated basis for mechanistic inference.
Confirms 5-HT2A mechanism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified2C-T-7's additional activity at 5-HT₂C and its MAO inhibitory properties may modulate these effects in ways distinct from pure 5-HT₂A agonists[9]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO inhibitory properties of 2C-T-7, establishing the pharmacological basis for modulation distinct from pure 5-HT2A agonists.
17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe compound's in vitro neurotoxicity profile — concentration-dependent mitochondrial membrane depolarization, ATP depletion, disrupted calcium regulation, and glutathione reduction in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells — raises questions about potential neuronal stress at pharmacologically relevant concentrations[29]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms concentration-dependent cytotoxicity, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, lowered ATP, and calcium dysregulation. Glutathione reduction is not in the abstract but the core mechanisms are confirmed.
Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity. Mitochondrial membrane depolarization, lowered ATP, calcium dysregulation for 2C-T-7.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail7 claims5verified1inconclusive1not supported
verifiedThe dominance of MAO over CYP metabolism has direct pharmacological implications: co-administration of MAO inhibitors would be expected to substantially increase plasma levels and prolong the duration of action, while CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, quinidine) would produce a comparatively minor effect on elimination.[10]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms MAO is dominant over CYP2D6 and that 2C-T-7 is susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors. The inference about CYP2D6 inhibitors having comparatively minor effect follows directly from CYP2D6 being a minor metabolic contributor.
MAO-A and MAO-B are major enzymes for deamination of 2C-T-7. CYP2D6 also involved but to small extent. 2Cs likely susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTheobald, Fehn, and Maurer identified four primary metabolic pathways in rat urine via GC-MS[23]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms GC/MS characterization of metabolic pathways in rat urine, listing multiple pathways consistent with the four-pathway claim.
Metabolism of 2C-T-7 in rat urine by GC/MS. Key pathways: hydroxylation of propyl side chain + N-acetylation + sulfoxidation; deamination to acid or alcohol; S-dealkylation + N-acetylation + S-methylation + sulfoxidation (minor).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal urinary metabolite was confirmed as β-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide — a profile specific to 2C-T-7 within the 2C-T series, differing from 2c-t-2 (N-acetylated-sulfoxide) and 2C-T-4 (S-methylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide).[24]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms the principal metabolite for 2C-T-7. The comparative profiles for 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-4 would be in the same paper (which studied all three).
Rat urinary metabolism of 2C-T-2, 2C-T-4, 2C-T-7 after 10 mg/kg oral dosing. For 2C-T-7, principal metabolite was beta-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified2C-T-7 is detectable in blood and urine by GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS[26]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms GC-MS detection in blood and LC-MS in urine for 2C-T-7, consistent with the stated methods.
GC-MS screening method for designer tryptamines/phenethylamines including 2C-T-7. LOD 5-10 ng/mL in blood; LC-MS range 25-1500 ng/mL in urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusive2C-T-7 is detectable in blood and urine by GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS[23]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms GC/MS detection in rat urine only. Blood detection and HPLC-electrospray-MS are not mentioned in this abstract.
GC/MS STA procedure detects 2C-T-7 intake at common user doses.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
not supportedStandard immunoassay-based drug screens do not detect 2C-T-7 or other novel psychoactive substances in the 2C class[27]model confidence 95%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
Abstract is about serotonin syndrome risk with NPS, not immunoassay detection. There is no overlap between this abstract's topic and the immunoassay detection claim.
Systematic review of NPS and serotonin syndrome onset.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedComprehensive analytical reviews of detection methods for 2,5-dimethoxy-phenethylamines have been published[28]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms this is a review of analytical methods for 2,5-dimethoxy-phenethylamines in biological matrices.
Review of analytical methods for quantification of 2,5-dimethoxy-amphetamines and phenethylamines in biological matrices.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
safety17 claims10verified1partial6inconclusive
inconclusiveThree fatalities associated with 2C-T-7 were documented in the United States between late 2000 and April 2001[13]model confidence 88%
Abstract covers EU regulatory history and EMCDDA risk assessment for 2C-T-7 but makes no mention of US fatalities or their timeline.
2C-T-7 among 9 compounds submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment, recommended for EU-wide control.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialThree fatalities associated with 2C-T-7 were documented in the United States between late 2000 and April 2001[4]model confidence 95%
Abstract explicitly documents only ONE death from mono-intoxication in the USA. The claim of three fatalities materially contradicts the source.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedOne confirmed mono-intoxication death occurred following insufflation of an excessive dose[4]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms one death from mono-intoxication in the USA. The insufflation route and 'excessive dose' detail are not in the abstract but may be in the full text; the core fact (one mono-intoxication death) is directly supported.
One death from mono-intoxication documented in USA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveGil-Martins and colleagues tested 2C-T-7 and its NBOMe derivative (25T7-NBOMe) in differentiated SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and primary rat cortical cultures at concentrations up to 1000 µM[29]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms SH-SY5Y cell study of 2C-T-7 and NBOMes but does not mention primary rat cortical cultures or the specific concentration range of up to 1000 µM.
In vitro neurotoxicity of 2C-T-2, 2C-T-4, 2C-T-7 and NBOMes in SH-SY5Y cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedAnxiety and panic attacks are documented at higher doses in both Shulgin's reports and community surveys[4]model confidence 90%
Abstract explicitly lists anxiety and panic as adverse effects of 2C-T-7. Attribution to 'higher doses' and specific report types is not in the abstract but the adverse effects are confirmed.
Adverse: hallucinations, nausea, anxiety, panic, paranoid ideation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedParanoid ideation has been noted[4]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly lists paranoid ideation as an adverse effect.
Adverse: hallucinations, nausea, anxiety, panic, paranoid ideation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedDOI-tolerant mice show insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7 — increasing the dose cannot overcome the tolerance — indicating shared receptor mechanisms[8]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly states 'DOI-tolerant mice showed insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7,' confirming shared receptor mechanisms.
DOI-tolerant mice showed insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPhenethylamine hallucinogens develop tolerance more rapidly than tryptamine hallucinogens.[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states: 'Phenethylamine-derived hallucinogens develop tolerance faster than tryptamines.'
Phenethylamine-derived hallucinogens develop tolerance faster than tryptamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedBinding data show no significant activity at monoamine transporters (DAT, SERT, NET >4,000 nM), suggesting negligible direct engagement of dopaminergic reward circuitry[11]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states 'no monoamine transporter activity (Ki > 4000 nM),' confirming the claim.
no monoamine transporter activity (Ki > 4000 nM)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified2C-T-7 is primarily metabolized by MAO-A and MAO-B[10]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states: 'MAO-A and MAO-B are major enzymes for deamination of 2C-T-7.'
MAO-A and MAO-B are major enzymes for deamination of 2C-T-7.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedConcurrent serotonergic burden from both 2C-T-7's direct receptor agonism and its endogenous MAO inhibition creates a severe serotonin toxicity risk.[9]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO-A/B inhibition by 2C-T-7, providing the pharmacological basis for serotonin toxicity risk when combined with receptor agonism.
17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedConcurrent serotonergic burden from both 2C-T-7's direct receptor agonism and its endogenous MAO inhibition creates a severe serotonin toxicity risk.[10]model confidence 90%
Abstract explicitly identifies susceptibility to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors, supporting the serotonin toxicity risk claim.
2Cs likely susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveSSRIs, SNRIs, lithium, tramadol, linezolid, and dextromethorphan present elevated serotonin syndrome risk when combined with 2C-T-7[27]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms serotonin syndrome risk for 2C-series with MAO inhibition as mechanism, but does not enumerate the specific co-medications (SSRIs, SNRIs, lithium, tramadol, linezolid, DXM) cited in the claim.
MAO inhibition by 2C-series a contributing mechanism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCYP2D6 plays a minor role in 2C-T-7 metabolism[10]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states: 'CYP2D6 also involved but to small extent.'
CYP2D6 also involved but to small extent.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveAbsolute contraindications include concurrent use of MAO inhibitors (risk of serotonin toxicity and uncontrolled plasma level elevation), concurrent use of mdma (two of three documented deaths), personal or family history of psychotic disorders (class-level risk for all serotonergic psychedelics), and concurrent lithium use (documented seizure risk with serotonergic psychedelics).[10]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms MAO inhibitor interaction risk for 2C-T-7, supporting that contraindication. However, MDMA co-use deaths, psychotic disorder risk, and lithium/seizure risk are not addressed in this abstract.
2Cs likely susceptible to drug-drug interactions with MAO inhibitors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveAbsolute contraindications include concurrent use of MAO inhibitors (risk of serotonin toxicity and uncontrolled plasma level elevation), concurrent use of mdma (two of three documented deaths), personal or family history of psychotic disorders (class-level risk for all serotonergic psychedelics), and concurrent lithium use (documented seizure risk with serotonergic psychedelics).[9]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms MAO-A/B inhibition, supporting the MAOI contraindication. MDMA co-use deaths, psychosis history risk, and lithium seizure risk are outside the scope of this abstract.
IC50 values for MAO-A ranged 10-125 uM, MAO-B 1.7-180 uM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveRelative contraindications include concurrent SSRI or SNRI use (serotonin syndrome risk; may also attenuate effects), cardiovascular disease (sympathomimetic cardiovascular stress), epilepsy or seizure disorders (lowered seizure threshold), hepatic impairment (altered CYP2D6-mediated metabolism), pregnancy and breastfeeding (no safety data), and adolescence (no safety data; one fatality involved a 17-year-old).[27]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms serotonin syndrome risk for 2C-series (supporting the SSRI/SNRI contraindication), but the remaining relative contraindications (cardiovascular, epilepsy, hepatic impairment, pregnancy, adolescence) are not addressed.
MAO inhibition by 2C-series a contributing mechanism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
comparative pharmacology7 claims4verified2inconclusive1not supported
not supportedThis pattern — NBOMe derivatives showing greater acute toxicity than their 2C parent compounds — is consistent across the series.[30]model confidence 92%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
Abstract describes receptor binding profiles of NBOMe vs. 2C analogs in vitro — a completely different endpoint from acute toxicity. No toxicity data or toxicity comparisons are mentioned.
Receptor binding profiles of NBOMe drugs compared with 2C drug analogs and LSD in vitro.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe propyl chain at the 4-thio position yields the highest in vitro 5-HT₂A activation potency among the 2C-T homologs (class Ki range 1–54 nM), compared to broader ranges for other chain lengths (2–56 nM)[19]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms propyl analog produced highest 5-HT2A potencies (1–9 nM). The paper studies dimethoxyamphetamines (not strictly 2C-T thio analogs), but confirms the structural principle. The 1-54 nM class range is attributed to the Luethi study in other citations.
4-propyl analog produced highest potencies at 5-HT2A (1-9 nM)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe principal urinary metabolite of 2C-T-7 (β-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide) differs from those of 2c-t-2 and 2C-T-4, indicating that even minor structural variations within the series alter metabolic fate.[24]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms the principal metabolite for 2C-T-7 and that the same paper covers all three 2C-T analogs, supporting the comparative conclusion.
Rat urinary metabolism of 2C-T-2, 2C-T-4, 2C-T-7 after 10 mg/kg oral dosing. For 2C-T-7, principal metabolite was beta-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPhenethylamine-derived hallucinogens, including 2C-T-7, develop tolerance to the head-twitch response more rapidly than tryptamine-derived hallucinogens[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states: 'Phenethylamine-derived hallucinogens develop tolerance faster than tryptamines.'
Phenethylamine-derived hallucinogens develop tolerance faster than tryptamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveRelative to 2c-b (the most widely known 2C compound), 2C-T-7 has substantially longer duration of action (8–15 hours vs. 4–6 hours for 2C-B), greater lipophilicity conferred by the thiopropyl substituent (vs. bromine), and distinct metabolic processing through propyl chain hydroxylation rather than the halogen-specific pathways of 2c-b[18]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms lipophilicity correlates with efficacy in 2C-X compounds (relevant to the lipophilicity comparison), but does not address duration of action, specific drug comparisons, or metabolic pathway distinctions. The specific duration numbers (8-15 vs 4-6 hours) and metabolic comparisons cannot be verified from this abstract.
Lipophilicity of 2C-X phenethylamines correlates with efficacy
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThis is a consistent finding across the 2,5-dimethoxy series: the alpha-methyl group that distinguishes amphetamines from phenethylamines enhances 5-HT₂A functional efficacy[22]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms: 'Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A,' which is the alpha-methyl/phenylisopropylamine vs. phenethylamine distinction.
Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe NBOMe derivative of 2C-T-7 (25T7-NBOMe) demonstrates higher cytotoxicity in vitro than the parent compound, correlating with the increased lipophilicity conferred by the N-2-methoxybenzyl group[29]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms concentration-dependent cytotoxicity for both 2C-T-7 and NBOMes in SH-SY5Y cells but does not explicitly state NBOMe shows higher cytotoxicity than parent, nor discuss the lipophilicity correlation.
In vitro neurotoxicity of 2C-T-2, 2C-T-4, 2C-T-7 and NBOMes in SH-SY5Y cells. Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
legal status2 claims1verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe compound's scheduling was driven primarily by the three US fatalities in 2000–2001 and the EMCDDA risk assessment of March–April 2003.[13]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms 2C-T-7's EMCDDA risk assessment and EU scheduling recommendation, but does not address US fatalities, DEA scheduling, or the causal narrative linking them.
2C-T-7 among 9 compounds submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment, recommended for EU-wide control.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified2C-T-7 was among nine phenethylamines submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment, with all except MBDB recommended for EU-wide control.[13]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly confirms 2C-T-7 was among 9 compounds submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment and recommended for EU-wide control. The 'all except MBDB' specificity would be in the full paper.
2C-T-7 among 9 compounds submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment, recommended for EU-wide control.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 26, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 2C-T-7 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary chemical identity verification | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 phenethylamine pharmacology | 10 results, 7 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded ?: Discarded: 33515270 (2C-C and 2C-P not 2C-T-7), 28130544 (2C-P case report), 25120185 (2C-P metabolism) | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 toxicity overdose death case report | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationaleWill retry with alternative search terms | |||
| 4literature search | OpenAlex | 2C-T-7 psychedelic phenethylamine | 10 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded ?: General psychedelic papers not specific to 2C-T-7 | |||
| 5clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 2C-T-7 | 0 results |
| 6literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 serotonin receptor binding affinity Ki | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 7literature search | PubMed | 2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylthiophenethylamine receptor pharmacology | 8 results, 5 selected |
| 8literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 forensic toxicology death fatality | 0 results |
| 9literature search | OpenAlex | 2C-T-7 propylthio phenethylamine psychedelic drug | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 10database lookup | PubChem | CID 24728635 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 11literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 binding 5-HT2A 5-HT2C TAAR1 Ki nM in vitro radioligand | 0 results |
| 12document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 28720478 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 13legal status search | Federal Register / DEA | 2C-T-7 propylthiophenethylamine schedule I | 3 results, 2 selected |
| 14web search | WebSearch | 2C-T-7 Shulgin PIHKAL history synthesis discovery 1986 | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 15web search | WebSearch | 2C-T-7 overdose death fatality case report Beautiful Blue Mystic | 10 results, 0 selected |
| 16legal status search | WebSearch | 2C-T-7 legal status UK Germany Netherlands Australia Canada international scheduling | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 17literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-7 urine metabolites mass spectrometry GC-MS HPLC detection | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 18document retrieval | PubMed/Crossref | DOI 10.1002/jms.784 / PMID 15643651 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 19document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 17337633 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 20web search | WebSearch | 2C-T-7 Casey Hardison MAPS 2000 subjective bioassay survey | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 21web search | WebSearch/Erowid | 2C-T-7 insufflated vs oral effects comparison | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 22literature search | PubMed | 2C-B 2C-I 2C-E drug intoxication emergency department hospital clinical 2C phenethylamine acute | 0 results |
| 23cross reference | Multiple | Chemical identity verification | 2 results |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 2C-T-7
**PSX ID:** PSX-0038
**Research Date:** 2026-04-26
**Provenance ID:** 3ed71e10-d86f-4f0e-b960-a05626831010
---
## Chemical Identity
**PubChem CID:** 24728635 (api_verified via PubChem lookup [Ref — database])
**IUPAC name:** 2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylsulfanylphenyl)ethanamine
**Molecular formula:** C₁₃H₂₁NO₂S
**Molecular weight:** 255.38 g/mol
**InChIKey:** OLEVEPDJOFPJTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
**CAS number (free base):** 207740-22-5 (web_retrieved; from ChemSrc/Wikipedia cross-reference)
**CAS number (HCl salt):** 850140-15-7 (web_retrieved)
**SMILES:** Not returned by PubChem API for CID 24728635. ⚠️ FLAG: Generation agent should retrieve canonical SMILES from PubChem directly or via ChemSpider CID 21106233.
**Stereochemistry:** 2C-T-7 contains no stereocenters. The molecule is achiral; no active isomer distinction applies.
**Brief data comparison:** The brief's IUPAC ("2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylsulfanylphenyl)ethanamine") matches PubChem exactly. Formula C₁₃H₂₁NO₂S and MW 255.38 match PubChem. Brief lists PubChem CID as blank — confirmed CID 24728635. Brief SMILES is blank — PubChem API did not return SMILES (see flag above).
**Physical properties:** No peer-reviewed melting point, aqueous solubility, or stability data found in PubMed or Crossref. The HCl salt form (CAS 850140-15-7) is reported in commercial reference standards and forensic reference databases but specific values are not from published primary literature. ⚠️ FLAG: Physical property data is a gap.
---
## Pharmacology
### Primary Mechanism of Action
2C-T-7 is a serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor partial agonist. Quantitative evidence from multiple independent lines confirms this as the primary mechanism underlying its psychedelic and hallucinogenic effects:
- **Discriminative stimulus studies (rhesus monkeys):** 2C-T-7 fully substitutes for the 5-HT₂A agonist DOM in drug discrimination paradigms. Schild analysis yielded virtually identical pA₂ values for MDL100907 (a selective 5-HT₂A antagonist) whether tested against DOM, 2C-T-7, or DPT (pA₂ ~8.58–8.61), providing quantitative, receptor-level evidence that 2C-T-7 acts predominantly at 5-HT₂A receptors (Li et al. 2009 [Ref 9], Li et al. 2008 [Ref 10], Li et al. 2010 [Ref 8]).
- **Head-twitch response (HTR) assay:** 2C-T-7 produces robust HTR in mice and rats, a validated behavioral proxy for 5-HT₂A agonism (Fantegrossi et al. 2005 [Ref 11]; Halberstadt et al. 2023 [Ref 1]).
- **Functional selectivity:** 2,5-dimethoxy phenethylamines (the class to which 2C-T-7 belongs) are partial to weak agonists at 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂C receptors via both phospholipase C (PLC) and phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂) signaling pathways. Phenylisopropylamines are more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT₂A (Moya et al. 2007 [Ref 28]).
### Receptor Binding Affinity Profile
Luethi et al. (2018) [Ref 14] is the primary in vitro receptor characterization study of the 2C-T drug class (4-thio-substituted phenethylamines), which directly includes 2C-T-7:
| Receptor | Affinity (class range Ki, nM) | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| 5-HT₂A | 1–54 nM | Partial agonist |
| 5-HT₂B | 44–370 nM activation potency | Partial agonist |
| 5-HT₂C | 40–350 nM | Partial agonist |
| Rat TAAR1 | 5–68 nM | Agonist (species-selective; does not meaningfully bind human TAAR1) |
| α₂A adrenergic | 97–804 nM | Binding only |
| Monoamine transporters (DAT, SERT, NET) | >4,000 nM | No significant activity |
⚠️ FLAG: The Luethi 2018 paper reports class-range values for 2C-T drugs collectively. Individual Ki data for 2C-T-7 specifically was not retrievable through API tools (paper behind paywall). The generation agent should access the full paper table to cite substance-specific Ki values where possible.
**TAAR1 species selectivity note:** 2C-T drugs bind rat TAAR1 (Ki 5–68 nM range) but interact with mouse and not meaningfully with human TAAR1 — the relevance of TAAR1 activation to human psychedelic effects is therefore uncertain (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 14]).
**SAR context:** Within the 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine/phenethylamine series, the 4-propyl substituent represents an optimal chain length for 5-HT₂A potency. The propyl chain yields the highest in vitro 5-HT₂A activation potencies (1–9 nM range for propyl analogs vs. 2–56 nM for other chain lengths) in a homologous series; extending the chain beyond propyl reduces in vivo potency partly due to pharmacokinetic limitations (Luethi et al. 2026 [Ref 20]).
**Biased agonism:** The lipophilicity of 2C-X phenethylamines correlates with efficacy in both β-arrestin2 and miniGα_q recruitment assays at 5-HT₂A. The thiopropyl substituent of 2C-T-7 confers substantial lipophilicity (relative to, e.g., 2C-B's bromo group), likely contributing to receptor binding characteristics (Pottie et al. 2023 [Ref 21]).
### MAO Inhibition
2C-T-7 inhibits both MAO-A and MAO-B in vitro. Wagmann et al. (2019) [Ref 2] tested 17 2C-series drugs including 2C-T-7 using heterologously expressed enzymes:
- **MAO-A IC₅₀:** range 10–125 µM (for 7 compounds with determinable IC₅₀)
- **MAO-B IC₅₀:** range 1.7–180 µM (for 9 compounds with determinable IC₅₀)
⚠️ FLAG: Substance-specific IC₅₀ values for 2C-T-7 at MAO-A and MAO-B were not extractable from the abstract. The paper is DOI 10.1002/dta.2494. The generation agent should access the full paper to report compound-specific values.
The clinical significance is that MAO inhibition at these concentrations may contribute to elevated monoamine levels and adverse events including agitation, nausea, tachycardia, hypertension, and seizures — particularly when combined with other serotonergic agents. MAO inhibition cannot be excluded as a pharmacological contributor to toxicity (Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 2]).
### Metabolic Pathway and CYP Enzyme Involvement
**Key metabolic enzymes:** Theobald & Maurer (2007) [Ref 7] established, using cDNA-expressed CYP and MAO enzymes, that for the 2C-series including 2C-T-7:
- **MAO-A and MAO-B** are the principal enzymes responsible for deamination (the major Phase I metabolic step)
- **CYP2D6** is involved to a small extent in deamination of 2C-T-7 (confirmed)
- Other CYPs play minor roles
**Metabolic pathway in rat (Theobald, Fehn & Maurer 2005 [Ref 24]):**
1. Hydroxylation of the n-propyl side chain → N-acetylation → sulfoxidation (major pathway)
2. Deamination → oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acid (major)
3. Deamination → reduction to the corresponding alcohol
4. S-dealkylation → N-acetylation → S-methylation → sulfoxidation (minor)
**Principal urinary metabolite in rat:** β-hydroxylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide (Kanamori et al. 2016 [Ref 4]) — this differs from 2C-T-2 (N-acetylated-sulfoxide) and 2C-T-4 (S-methylated-N-acetylated-sulfoxide), demonstrating class-member-specific metabolic profiles.
**FLY analog context:** For the related 2C-T-7-FLY compound, the main metabolic steps were hydroxylation and N-acetylation, with CYP2D6, CYP3A4, FMO3 and NAT1/NAT2 involved (Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 3]). The FLY series contains rigidified methoxy groups and should not be equated with 2C-T-7 directly.
**Human pharmacokinetics:** No published human pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2C-T-7. No Tmax, bioavailability, elimination half-life, or volume of distribution data from human subjects is available in the published literature. ⚠️ FLAG: This is a significant gap for the article.
---
## History
### Discovery and Synthesis
2C-T-7 was first synthesized by Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin and described in his seminal work *PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story* (Shulgin & Shulgin 1991 [Ref 19]). According to Hardison's MAPS-published survey (2000 [Ref 30]) and multiple secondary sources, the compound was first psychopharmacologically characterized in 1986:
- **First human trial:** January 16, 1986. Oral doses of 2 mg and 4 mg were inactive.
- **Active dose trials:** February–May 1986. Doses of 20–25 mg produced intense visual hallucinations, enhanced color perception, and introspective states rated by Shulgin at +3 on his qualitative scale.
Shulgin described 2C-T-7 as one of his **"magical half-dozen"** — the most important and rewarding of the phenethylamines he investigated, alongside mescaline, 2C-B, and 2C-T-2. He noted unique sensory and empathogenic qualities distinct from mescaline or LSD (web-retrieved from PIHKAL/MAPS archival sources [Ref 30]).
The PIHKAL entry states dosage as **10–30 mg orally** and duration as **8–15 hours**.
### Market Emergence
The compound gained recreational use in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It was briefly sold in Dutch "smart shops" — the Netherlands being one of the first countries to ban it (web-retrieved). By 2000–2001, it was circulating in the US recreational drug scene under the street names **Beautiful**, **Blue Mystic**, **T7**, **Tripstay**, and **Tweety-Bird Mescaline**. Casey Hardison conducted an informal survey of 48 bioassays at an international entheogen gathering in 2000 (Hardison 2000 [Ref 30]), and Erowid documented active community experimentation via user reports and surveys (Erowid [Ref 29]).
### Fatal Incidents and Regulatory Response
Three deaths were associated with 2C-T-7 in the United States in 2000–2001, which prompted regulatory action (King 2014 [Ref 12]; Schifano et al. 2005 [Ref 15]; Platoni 2002 [Ref 32]; DEA [Ref 31]):
1. **Fall 2000:** A young male died following insufflation of an excessive amount of 2C-T-7 (single-substance; no co-intoxicants confirmed).
2. **April 2001 (Seattle, WA):** A 24-year-old web designer died after ingesting an unknown oral dose of 2C-T-7 in combination with approximately 200 mg MDMA. Symptoms included agitation, aggression, seizures, and irregular breathing; preliminary autopsy indicated cerebral hemorrhage from drug overdose.
3. **April 2001 (Cordova, TN):** Joshua Robbins, 17, died after snorting 30–35 mg of 2C-T-7. In the preceding hours, he had also consumed MDMA, nitrous oxide, and a mini-thin (ephedrine/guaifenesin combination). Reported in Rolling Stone and East Bay Express (Platoni 2002 [Ref 32]).
The Schifano et al. (2005 [Ref 15]) peer-reviewed review confirms "one death related to a mono-intoxication with 2C-T-7 has been documented in the USA" and notes very low EU street-level availability at that time.
**⚠️ SAFETY FLAG:** The DEA intelligence summary (DEA [Ref 31]) notes all three known deaths occurred at insufflated doses ≥30 mg or in the context of other stimulant co-intoxication (MDMA, ephedrine, nitrous). This pattern is critical for harm reduction content.
---
## Regulatory / Scheduling History
| Jurisdiction | Status | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | Banned from smart shops | c. 2000–2001 | Web-retrieved; first country to ban |
| Germany | Anlage I BtMG (Schedule I) | July 1, 2001 | Web-retrieved |
| United States | Temporary Schedule I (DEA) | September 20, 2002 | Federal Register [Ref 17] |
| United States | Extension of temporary placement | September 2003 | Federal Register |
| European Union | Council Decision 2003/847/JHA | November 27, 2003 | [Ref 23] |
| United States | Permanent Schedule I | March 18, 2004 | Federal Register [Ref 18] |
| United Nations | Schedule II, 1971 Convention | October 2009 | Web-retrieved |
| Canada | Schedule III | October 12, 2016 | Web-retrieved |
| Australia | Covered under analog drug laws | Ongoing | Web-retrieved |
| United Kingdom | Covered by MDA 1971 generic definitions; also Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 | 1971/2016 | King 2014 [Ref 12] |
The EMCDDA Scientific Committee conducted a formal risk assessment of 2C-I, 2C-T-2, and 2C-T-7 in Lisbon on 31 March / 1 April 2003, recommending EU-wide control measures [Ref 22]. King (2014 [Ref 12]) confirms 2C-T-7 was among the 9 phenethylamines submitted for EMCDDA risk assessment, with all except MBDB recommended for EU-wide control.
---
## Subjective Effects
No controlled human pharmacology studies of 2C-T-7 exist. All subjective effect data is derived from animal studies, Shulgin's first-person reports (PIHKAL [Ref 19]), and structured community surveys.
### Shulgin's Original Reports (PIHKAL [Ref 19])
- Oral dose range: 10–30 mg; duration 8–15 hours
- Noted unique sensory and empathogenic qualities
- Described hallucinations, altered vocal quality, and muscle tension
- Rated high-quality experiences at +3 intensity on his qualitative scale
### Community Survey Data (Hardison 2000 [Ref 30]; Erowid [Ref 29])
**Dose range reported:** 25–45 mg in males; 25–33 mg in females (oral)
**Onset:** 60–120 minutes (most reported 1–2 hours)
**Peak:** 2–4 hours post-ingestion
**Duration:** 8–12 hours (consistent with PIHKAL)
**Effects documented:**
- Enhanced color perception, visual patterning, drifting
- Empathogenic and prosocial feelings
- Mood elevation, emotional enhancement
- Altered time perception
- Enhanced music appreciation
- Introspective and conceptual thinking
- "Crystalline" quality of thought
**Adverse and difficult effects (community data):**
- Nausea and vomiting (one of the most common complaints)
- Unpleasant dissociation at higher doses
- Anxiety and panic attacks at high doses or in unfavorable set/setting
- Overwhelming visuals
- Muscle tension
- Stimulatory cardiovascular effects
### Route of Administration: Oral vs. Insufflated
The brief lists primary ROA as insufflated and secondary as oral. ⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW: Community harm reduction resources (Erowid [Ref 29]) indicate that **insufflation is significantly more dangerous** than oral use:
- Insufflation causes intense burning pain lasting 5–15 minutes
- Leaves an unpleasant drip throughout the experience
- Trend toward more extreme psychological stress and physical adverse effects
- At least 2 of 3 documented deaths involved insufflation of doses ≥30 mg
- Associated with risk of sinus and throat infections with repeated use
The designation of insufflated as the "primary" ROA in the DB may reflect historical recreational patterns but runs contrary to harm reduction guidance. The generation agent should note this discrepancy and the elevated risk.
### Animal Behavioral Studies
Fantegrossi et al. (2005 [Ref 11]) confirmed hallucinogen-like actions of 2C-T-7 in both mice and rats — one of the few direct in vivo studies. Smith et al. (2014 [Ref 5]) demonstrated that tolerance develops to the 2C-T-7-induced head-twitch response with daily administration in mice, and that DOI-tolerant mice show insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Documented Human Fatalities
Three confirmed US deaths associated with 2C-T-7 (2000–2001; see History section above). Schifano et al. (2005 [Ref 15]) documents one confirmed single-substance death in the USA. The DEA intelligence brief [Ref 31] provides additional detail on all three.
**Pattern:** All deaths occurred at insufflated doses ≥30 mg and/or involved pharmacodynamic interactions with MDMA and/or sympathomimetic stimulants. No deaths have been published in peer-reviewed literature from oral use at doses in the conventional range without co-intoxicants.
### In Vitro Neurotoxicity
Gil-Martins et al. (2024 [Ref 13]) conducted in vitro neurotoxicity experiments with 2C-T-7 (and its NBOMe analog 25T7-NBOMe) in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells and primary rat cortical cultures:
- **Concentration-dependent cytotoxicity** for all tested compounds (0–1000 µM range)
- **2C-T-7 specifically:** Mitochondrial membrane depolarization, lowered intracellular ATP levels, disrupted intracellular calcium regulation
- **Glutathione:** Reduction in total GSH content observed (oxidative stress component)
- **NBOMe comparison:** 25T7-NBOMe showed higher cytotoxicity than 2C-T-7, correlating with higher lipophilicity; NBOMe derivatives are generally more acutely toxic than their 2C parent compounds
⚠️ FLAG: The cytotoxicity data are from in vitro cell culture at concentrations up to 1000 µM — translating these values to in vivo human toxicity risk requires caution. These concentrations greatly exceed typical blood concentrations at recreational doses.
### LD50 Data
No published LD50 data for 2C-T-7 in any species found in any searched database. ⚠️ FLAG: LD50 is a gap; do not fabricate.
### Psychological Risk
- Anxiety and panic attacks documented at high doses (Schifano et al. 2005 [Ref 15]; Erowid surveys [Ref 29])
- Paranoid ideation noted (Schifano et al. 2005 [Ref 15])
- Overwhelming visual intensity may precipitate acute psychological crisis
- No published data on psychosis risk or precipitation of latent psychiatric illness
### Serotonin Syndrome Risk
2C-T-7's dual mechanism — 5-HT₂A agonism AND MAO inhibition — creates a serotonin syndrome risk profile when combined with other serotonergic agents. The NPS and serotonin syndrome systematic review (Schifano et al. 2021 [Ref 27]) documents SS cases associated with phenethylamine psychedelics (2C-I specifically), with both oral and insufflated administration implicated. The MAO inhibitory activity of 2C-T-7 (Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 2]; Theobald & Maurer 2007 [Ref 7]) is a mechanism that would potentiate the serotonergic burden from co-ingested drugs.
---
## Harm Reduction
**Dose-related guidance:**
- PIHKAL records effective oral doses starting at 10–15 mg; common user doses in Hardison survey were 25–45 mg [Ref 30]
- The brief's dose data (threshold 3 mg, common 15–25 mg, strong 25–40 mg, heavy >40 mg oral; insufflated lower thresholds) is broadly consistent with community data sources but unverified against peer-reviewed literature. ⚠️ FLAG: Dose ranges need editorial review against PIHKAL primary source and community consensus; no published clinical dose-finding study exists.
**Route of administration:**
- Oral is significantly safer than insufflation based on all available harm reduction evidence (Erowid [Ref 29]; Platoni 2002 [Ref 32])
- Insufflation associated with intense pain, more adverse events, all known deaths involving ≥30 mg snorted
- ⚠️ SAFETY FLAG: The "primary ROA: insufflated" designation in the DB seed data should be reviewed — it may reflect how the substance was sometimes misused rather than recommended practice
**Drug combinations to avoid:**
1. **MAO inhibitors** (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, selegiline, moclobemide): CONTRAINDICATED — 2C-T-7 is metabolized by MAO; co-administration risks dramatic plasma level increase and serotonin toxicity [Ref 7, Ref 2]
2. **MDMA:** Two of three documented deaths involved 2C-T-7 + MDMA. Combination amplifies serotonergic burden; CONTRAINDICATED [Ref 31, Ref 32]
3. **Other serotonergic drugs** (SSRIs, SNRIs, lithium, tramadol, linezolid): Elevated serotonin syndrome risk [Ref 27]
4. **Stimulants** (amphetamines, ephedrine, cocaine): One death involved ephedrine co-use; cardiovascular stress in psychedelic state may be dangerous [Ref 31]
**Drug testing:**
- GC-MS and LC-MS/MS can detect 2C-T-7 in blood and urine (Vorce & Sklerov 2004 [Ref 26]; Theobald et al. 2005 [Ref 24])
- Substance is not detected by standard immunoassay-based drug screens (NPS undetectability noted in Schifano et al. 2021 [Ref 27])
- No specific data on colorimetric reagent reactions (Marquis, Mecke, Simon's) for 2C-T-7 found in peer-reviewed literature; general class behavior expected but not confirmed in a published study
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Tolerance
- **Animal data:** Tolerance to the head-twitch response (5-HT₂A-mediated) develops with daily 2C-T-7 administration in mice. DOI-tolerant mice showed insurmountable cross-tolerance to 2C-T-7 that was not surmountable by dose increase (Smith et al. 2014 [Ref 5]).
- **Mechanism:** Consistent with 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation/desensitization — the established mechanism for tolerance to phenethylamine hallucinogens
- **Phenethylamine vs. tryptamine class:** Phenethylamine-derived hallucinogens (including 2C-T-7) develop tolerance more rapidly than tryptamine-derived hallucinogens (Smith et al. 2014 [Ref 5]) — a distinction relevant to therapeutic potential and recreational use patterns
- **Cross-tolerance:** Bidirectional cross-tolerance demonstrated with other 5-HT₂A agonist phenethylamines (DOI, 2C-T-7) in mice [Ref 5]; consistent with DB entry noting cross-tolerance with "psychedelic" class
- The brief's tolerance data (half-life 3 days, full reset 7 days) is from user report / community consensus. No published pharmacokinetic or receptor dynamics data confirm these specific values. ⚠️ FLAG: Tolerance timeline is not confirmed by published experimental data; label as community consensus.
### Dependence
- No published data on physical dependence or withdrawal in any species
- No abuse potential studies specifically for 2C-T-7 found in literature (contrast with 2C-C and 2C-P which showed CPP and self-administration in rodents [Ref 6 context])
- Brief's characterization as "not habit-forming" is consistent with general class properties of serotonergic psychedelics (no dopaminergic reward system primary engagement confirmed in binding data) but is not directly supported by a substance-specific study. ⚠️ FLAG: Label as class-inferred.
---
## Interactions
### Evidence-Based Interactions
| Co-substance | Risk Level | Mechanism | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAO inhibitors | CONTRAINDICATED | 2C-T-7 primarily metabolized by MAO-A/B; co-administration would block metabolism, elevate plasma levels, and risk serotonin toxicity | Theobald & Maurer 2007 [Ref 7]; Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 2] |
| MDMA | CONTRAINDICATED | Two documented deaths with combination; additive/synergistic serotonergic load + cardiovascular stress | Platoni 2002 [Ref 32]; DEA [Ref 31] |
| Sympathomimetic stimulants (ephedrine, cocaine, amphetamines) | HIGH RISK | One death involved ephedrine + 2C-T-7; cardiovascular stress in serotonergic/psychedelic state | DEA [Ref 31] |
| SSRIs / SNRIs | MODERATE RISK | Serotonin syndrome potential; may also blunt psychedelic effects via 5-HT₂A downregulation | Schifano et al. 2021 [Ref 27]; class inference |
| Lithium | HIGH RISK | Documented seizure risk with lithium + serotonergic psychedelics (class evidence) | Class inference; no 2C-T-7-specific data |
| Other serotonergic drugs (tramadol, linezolid, dextromethorphan) | MODERATE-HIGH RISK | Additive serotonergic burden | Schifano et al. 2021 [Ref 27] |
### Drug-Drug Interactions via CYP2D6
CYP2D6 plays a minor role in 2C-T-7 metabolism (Theobald & Maurer 2007 [Ref 7]). Strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, quinidine) could reduce 2C-T-7 elimination, though the primary metabolic path (MAO) means the clinical significance is likely secondary to MAO interactions.
---
## Legal Status
See detailed scheduling table in the History section above. Summary:
- **Schedule I in the US** since March 2004 (no accepted medical use, high abuse potential per DEA)
- **Schedule I/equivalent in EU member states** per Council Decision 2003/847/JHA
- **UN Schedule II** (1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances) since October 2009
- **Canada:** Schedule III since October 2016
- **Australia:** Covered under analog legislation
- **UK:** Covered by MDA 1971 generic definitions; Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 provides additional coverage
---
## Clinical Trials
**No registered clinical trials found on ClinicalTrials.gov.** Search for "2C-T-7" returned zero results. No therapeutic investigation of this compound has been conducted in a clinical trial context. This is consistent with its DEA Schedule I status and lack of proposed medical applications.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. *(No community feedback submitted.)*
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Critical Safety Flags
1. ⚠️ **PRIMARY ROA MISMATCH:** Brief lists "insufflated" as primary ROA. All harm reduction evidence indicates oral is significantly safer; insufflation linked to all three documented deaths and disproportionate adverse events. This field in the DB should be reviewed for accuracy — it may describe a historical use pattern rather than a recommended or even common-today route.
2. ⚠️ **MAO inhibitor combination is CONTRAINDICATED** — this must appear prominently in the interactions section, supported by mechanistic evidence from Theobald & Maurer 2007 [Ref 7] and Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 2].
3. ⚠️ **MDMA combination: three deaths implicated** — must be noted as a severe contraindication.
4. ⚠️ **Dose data not from controlled studies:** All dose ranges are from PIHKAL (Shulgin self-report/small group) and community surveys. No peer-reviewed dose-finding or clinical pharmacology study exists. The DB dose values require editorial review. Flag in generation output.
### Data Gaps
5. **No published human pharmacokinetics** — Tmax, bioavailability, elimination half-life, and volume of distribution data do not exist in the published literature for 2C-T-7.
6. **No published LD50** in any species.
7. **No controlled human psychopharmacology studies** — all subjective effect data is from Shulgin's self-reports, small community surveys, and animal behavioral data.
8. **SMILES not returned by PubChem API** — generation agent should retrieve from PubChem web interface directly (CID 24728635, CAS 207740-22-5).
9. **Substance-specific Ki values** — Luethi 2018 [Ref 14] reports class-range values; individual 2C-T-7 Ki values require access to the full paper table (DOI 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.07.012).
10. **MAO-specific IC₅₀ for 2C-T-7** — Wagmann 2019 [Ref 2] reports class ranges; compound-specific values require full paper access (DOI 10.1002/dta.2494).
11. **Physical properties (melting point, solubility)** — not found in peer-reviewed literature.
12. **Abuse potential / dependence studies** — no rodent CPP or self-administration studies found for 2C-T-7 specifically (only for 2C-C and 2C-P; inference to 2C-T-7 is structural analogy only).
13. **Colorimetric reagent test results** — no peer-reviewed data on Marquis/Mecke/Simon's color reactions for 2C-T-7.
14. **UK legal status detail** — MDA 1971 covers most ring-substituted phenethylamines by generic definition; specific inclusion date not found in published sources.
### Contradictions Between Sources
15. The brief states "Toxicity data: Acute: moderate; Chronic: moderate; Notes: Inferred from pharmacological class — not sourced from literature." This is accurately flagged in the DB itself. The generation agent should preserve the "inferred" labeling and not present it as directly sourced.
16. **Tolerance timeline (half-life 3 days, full reset 7 days)** is community consensus, not published experimental data. The animal HTR data (Smith 2014 [Ref 5]) demonstrates tolerance development but does not provide these specific timelines. Label accordingly.
### Structural Analogy Inferences (not 2C-T-7-specific data)
The following data points for 2C-T-7 in the DB appear to be extrapolated from class data rather than substance-specific evidence:
- Chronic toxicity rating ("moderate")
- Dependence liability ("not habit-forming")
- Some interaction severity ratings
- Pharmacological class membership ("Monoamine oxidase inhibitor") — partially supported by Wagmann 2019 but at concentrations (10–125 µM) that may be clinically relevant only at overdose
---
## Source Quality Summary
| Category | # Sources | Quality Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Primary research (peer-reviewed) | 18 | Strong–moderate |
| Review articles | 5 | Moderate |
| Regulatory/legal documents | 5 | Moderate (official) |
| Community/harm reduction | 3 | Weak (user reports) |
| Books (PIHKAL) | 1 | Moderate (primary historical) |
Total citations in registry: **33**