Skip to main content
Sources
25
2 strong · 18 moderate · 5 weak

Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.

Claims checked
64
56verified3partial4inconclusive1not supported

Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.

Generated
Apr 21, 2026 · pipeline-v5
Values approved
225/227 (99%)

Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.

01

Value Provenance

Dosing

insufflatedtrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold1 mg1 mglow
Low1–4 mg1–4 mglow
Common4–7 mg4–7 mglow
Strong7–14 mg7–14 mglow
Heavy14+ mg14+ mglow
Editorial

Existing database values carried forward. All insufflated dose ranges are entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. The only confirmed 2C-E fatality occurred via insufflation of an unknown dose. Faster absorption and higher peak concentrations via this route make these lower ranges plausible relative to oral, but no formal dose-finding study exists. Safety-critical gap flagged for editorial review.

Reasoning

Existing database values carried forward. All insufflated dose ranges are entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. The only confirmed 2C-E fatality occurred via insufflation of an unknown dose. Faster absorption and higher peak concentrations via this route make these lower ranges plausible relative to oral, but no formal dose-finding study exists. Safety-critical gap flagged for editorial review.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

oraltrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold2 mg2 mgmedium
Low5–10 mg5–10 mgmedium
Common10–15 mg10–15 mgmedium
Strong15–25 mg15–25 mgmedium
Heavy30+ mg30+ mgmedium
Editorial

Existing database values carried forward. Threshold of 2 mg is community-derived and below Shulgin's documented minimum of 10 mg (PiHKAL entry #24). Papaseit 2020 used 6.5 mg as lowest dose with measurable effects. Common range (10–15 mg) consistent with lower portion of Shulgin's 10–25 mg range. Strong range upper end (25 mg) matches Shulgin's maximum documented dose. Heavy (30+ mg) exceeds all published dose ranges. Discrepancy between community threshold and published minimums flagged for editorial review.

Reasoning

Existing database values carried forward. Threshold of 2 mg is community-derived and below Shulgin's documented minimum of 10 mg (PiHKAL entry #24). Papaseit 2020 used 6.5 mg as lowest dose with measurable effects. Common range (10–15 mg) consistent with lower portion of Shulgin's 10–25 mg range. Strong range upper end (25 mg) matches Shulgin's maximum documented dose. Heavy (30+ mg) exceeds all published dose ranges. Discrepancy between community threshold and published minimums flagged for editorial review.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Duration

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace20–45 minutes20–45 minutesmedium
Editorial

Community consensus. Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours provides an upper bound for absorption; subjective onset precedes Tmax. Consistent with general phenethylamine oral pharmacokinetics.

Reasoning

Community consensus. Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours provides an upper bound for absorption; subjective onset precedes Tmax. Consistent with general phenethylamine oral pharmacokinetics.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Peaktrace2–3 hours2–3 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours (peak concentration period). Shulgin PiHKAL characterises the experience as sustained at high intensity for several hours.

Reasoning

Community consensus anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours (peak concentration period). Shulgin PiHKAL characterises the experience as sustained at high intensity for several hours.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Offsettrace2–4 hours2–4 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus. Derived from total duration (8–12 hours per Shulgin PiHKAL) minus onset, come-up, and peak phases.

Reasoning

Community consensus. Derived from total duration (8–12 hours per Shulgin PiHKAL) minus onset, come-up, and peak phases.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Totaltrace6–10 hours6–10 hoursmedium
Editorial

Existing database value of 6–10 hours. Shulgin PiHKAL reports 8–12 hours. Papaseit 2020 assessed effects across 6 hours (study endpoint, not total duration). The 6–10 hour range reflects community consensus; Shulgin's broader range may include aftereffects or higher-dose experiences. Duration discrepancy flagged for editorial review.

Reasoning

Existing database value of 6–10 hours. Shulgin PiHKAL reports 8–12 hours. Papaseit 2020 assessed effects across 6 hours (study endpoint, not total duration). The 6–10 hour range reflects community consensus; Shulgin's broader range may include aftereffects or higher-dose experiences. Duration discrepancy flagged for editorial review.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace30–60 minutes30–60 minutesmedium
Editorial

Community consensus for 2C-E oral come-up. Compatible with the ~2 hour saliva Tmax from Papaseit 2020 (onset + come-up spans the absorption phase).

Reasoning

Community consensus for 2C-E oral come-up. Compatible with the ~2 hour saliva Tmax from Papaseit 2020 (onset + come-up spans the absorption phase).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

After effectstrace6–12 hours6–12 hourslow
Editorial

Community consensus. No published data on 2C-E aftereffect duration. Consistent with serotonergic psychedelic class (residual effects lasting 6–12 hours post-resolution).

Reasoning

Community consensus. No published data on 2C-E aftereffect duration. Consistent with serotonergic psychedelic class (residual effects lasting 6–12 hours post-resolution).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

insufflated

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Peaktrace1.5–2.5 hours1.5–2.5 hourslow
Editorial

Community consensus only. Shorter peak than oral route consistent with faster absorption kinetics.

Reasoning

Community consensus only. Shorter peak than oral route consistent with faster absorption kinetics.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Onsettrace1–5 minutes1–5 minuteslow
Editorial

Community consensus only. No published PK data for insufflated 2C-E. Faster onset expected from mucosal absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Community consensus only. No published PK data for insufflated 2C-E. Faster onset expected from mucosal absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace10–30 minutes10–30 minuteslow
Editorial

Community consensus only. Substantially faster come-up than oral route expected from pharmacokinetic principles.

Reasoning

Community consensus only. Substantially faster come-up than oral route expected from pharmacokinetic principles.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Offsettrace1.5–3 hours1.5–3 hourslow
Editorial

Community consensus. Derived from total duration estimate minus onset, come-up, and peak phases.

Reasoning

Community consensus. Derived from total duration estimate minus onset, come-up, and peak phases.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Totaltrace4–7 hours4–7 hourslow
Editorial

Community consensus. Shorter total duration than oral route is consistent with general pharmacokinetic principles for insufflated vs oral administration. No published data exist.

Reasoning

Community consensus. Shorter total duration than oral route is consistent with general pharmacokinetic principles for insufflated vs oral administration. No published data exist.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

After effectstrace4–8 hours4–8 hourslow
Editorial

Community consensus. No published data. Shorter aftereffect window than oral consistent with compressed timeline.

Reasoning

Community consensus. No published data. Shorter aftereffect window than oral consistent with compressed timeline.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Safety

Toxicity Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Acutemoderatemoderatemedium
Chroniclowlowmedium
Organs Affectedcardiovascular, neurologicalcardiovascular, neurologicalmedium
Editorial

Classified as moderate acute (not high): the single fatality occurred via insufflation of an unknown large dose with mislabelling; controlled oral observation (n=10, 6.5–25 mg) showed no serious adverse events (Papaseit 2020). Excited delirium and seizures documented for the 2C class generally (Dean 2013), but evidence is from case reports and toxicology reviews, not systematic dose-response studies. Chronic toxicity classified as low: no organ damage documented from repeated use; no chronic use studies exist; classification is class-level inference from serotonergic psychedelic pharmacology.

Reasoning

Classified as moderate acute (not high): the single fatality occurred via insufflation of an unknown large dose with mislabelling; controlled oral observation (n=10, 6.5–25 mg) showed no serious adverse events (Papaseit 2020). Excited delirium and seizures documented for the 2C class generally (Dean 2013), but evidence is from case reports and toxicology reviews, not systematic dose-response studies. Chronic toxicity classified as low: no organ damage documented from repeated use; no chronic use studies exist; classification is class-level inference from serotonergic psychedelic pharmacology.

Evidence basis: published_case_series

Dependence Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Physicalnonenonemedium
Psychologicalnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Compulsive Redosingnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Dose Escalationnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Editorial

No substance-specific dependence data exist for 2C-E. Classification based on established pharmacology of serotonergic psychedelics: 5-HT2A agonists consistently show negligible dependence liability across the class. Rapid tolerance via receptor downregulation (de la Fuente Revenga 2022) is self-limiting. Weak transporter effects (Nagai 2007) confirm minimal dopaminergic reinforcement.

Reasoning

No substance-specific dependence data exist for 2C-E. Classification based on established pharmacology of serotonergic psychedelics: 5-HT2A agonists consistently show negligible dependence liability across the class. Rapid tolerance via receptor downregulation (de la Fuente Revenga 2022) is self-limiting. Weak transporter effects (Nagai 2007) confirm minimal dopaminergic reinforcement.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Withdrawal Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Severitynonenonemedium
Symptoms——medium
FatalNoNomedium
Medical SupervisionNot requiredNot requiredmedium
Editorial

No withdrawal syndrome has been reported for 2C-E or any 2C-series compound. Consistent with the pharmacology of 5-HT2A agonists, which do not produce physical dependence.

Reasoning

No withdrawal syndrome has been reported for 2C-E or any 2C-series compound. Consistent with the pharmacology of 5-HT2A agonists, which do not produce physical dependence.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Tolerance Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Builduprapidrapidmedium
Half-life3 days3 daysmedium
Full Reset14 days14 daysmedium
Cross-tolerancesLSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, 2C-B, 2C-I, 2C-D, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7, DOMLSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, 2C-B, 2C-I, 2C-D, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7, DOMmedium
Editorial

Tolerance mechanism established for psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists by de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022). Half-life and full reset values are class-level consensus (community-derived for serotonergic psychedelics generally); no 2C-E-specific tolerance kinetics have been published. Cross-tolerance list based on shared 5-HT2A mechanism.

Reasoning

Tolerance mechanism established for psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists by de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022). Half-life and full reset values are class-level consensus (community-derived for serotonergic psychedelics generally); no 2C-E-specific tolerance kinetics have been published. Cross-tolerance list based on shared 5-HT2A mechanism.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Effects & Profile

Contraindications

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
psychiatric psychotic disorderstraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelics. No 2C-E-specific data; inferred from shared 5-HT2A mechanism.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelics. No 2C-E-specific data; inferred from shared 5-HT2A mechanism.

psychiatric bipolar disordertraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No 2C-E-specific data.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No 2C-E-specific data.

cardiovascular hypertensiontracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Cardiovascular effects documented in Papaseit 2020 (n=10, oral 6.5–25 mg). Extrapolation to hypertensive risk is class-level inference.

Reasoning

Cardiovascular effects documented in Papaseit 2020 (n=10, oral 6.5–25 mg). Extrapolation to hypertensive risk is class-level inference.

cardiovascular cardiac arrhythmiastracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

One fatality attributed to cardiac arrest (Erowid, ABC News 2011). Cardiovascular stimulation documented in Papaseit 2020.

Reasoning

One fatality attributed to cardiac arrest (Erowid, ABC News 2011). Cardiovascular stimulation documented in Papaseit 2020.

neurological epilepsytraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Seizures documented in 2C-class toxicology review (Dean 2013). No 2C-E-specific seizure mechanistic data, but class-level evidence supports this contraindication.

Reasoning

Seizures documented in 2C-class toxicology review (Dean 2013). No 2C-E-specific seizure mechanistic data, but class-level evidence supports this contraindication.

other MAOI usetraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Pharmacological mechanism: additive serotonergic load. No 2C-E-specific case report, but class-level evidence for serotonin syndrome risk with serotonergic agent + MAOI combinations is well established.

Reasoning

Pharmacological mechanism: additive serotonergic load. No 2C-E-specific case report, but class-level evidence for serotonin syndrome risk with serotonergic agent + MAOI combinations is well established.

other tramadol usetraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Classified as 'dangerous' in existing database. Pharmacological mechanism supported by Baldo 2018 and Park 2014. No substance-specific case report; classification rests on class-level pharmacological evidence.

Reasoning

Classified as 'dangerous' in existing database. Pharmacological mechanism supported by Baldo 2018 and Park 2014. No substance-specific case report; classification rests on class-level pharmacological evidence.

pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtraceabsoluteabsolutelow
Editorial

No data exist. Standard precautionary contraindication for psychoactive substances without reproductive safety profiles.

Reasoning

No data exist. Standard precautionary contraindication for psychoactive substances without reproductive safety profiles.

Timeline Phases

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace1200–2700 sec(i=0.05)1200–2700 sec(i=0.05)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Come uptrace1800–3600 sec(i=0.30)1800–3600 sec(i=0.30)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Peaktrace7200–10800 sec(i=1.00)7200–10800 sec(i=1.00)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Plateautrace5400–10800 sec(i=0.55)5400–10800 sec(i=0.55)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Resolutiontrace5400–10800 sec(i=0.20)5400–10800 sec(i=0.20)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Afterglowtrace21600–43200 sec(i=0.05)21600–43200 sec(i=0.05)medium
Editorial

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

Reasoning

Oral timeline anchored to Papaseit 2020 saliva Tmax of ~2 hours and Shulgin PiHKAL total duration of 8-12 hours. DB community consensus total of 6-10 hours is more conservative; the proposed timeline covers the broader 8-12 hour range from Shulgin with community data informing phase distribution. No formal PK time-course data beyond saliva Tmax.

insufflated

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace60–300 sec(i=0.05)60–300 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Come uptrace600–1800 sec(i=0.40)600–1800 sec(i=0.40)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Peaktrace5400–7200 sec(i=1.00)5400–7200 sec(i=1.00)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Plateautrace3600–5400 sec(i=0.50)3600–5400 sec(i=0.50)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Resolutiontrace3600–7200 sec(i=0.20)3600–7200 sec(i=0.20)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Afterglowtrace14400–28800 sec(i=0.05)14400–28800 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Reasoning

Insufflated timeline is entirely community-consensus-derived with no published pharmacokinetic support. No formal PK study of insufflated 2C-E exists. The confirmed US fatality occurred via this route, underscoring the higher-risk profile. Phase durations inferred from community reports and general pharmacokinetic principles (faster onset, shorter total duration, higher peak for insufflated vs oral).

Dose Tier Summaries

thresholdtrace
low

At threshold doses (~2 mg oral), effects are subtle and easily dismissed: a faint brightening of colours, mild mood elevation, and a gentle sense of heightened sensory awareness. Most individuals report only marginal perceptual changes at this level, with no clear psychedelic character. Physically, mild pupil dilation may be noticeable. Other somatic effects are generally sub-perceptual. The experience does not meaningfully impair cognitive function or daily activities. Note: The threshold range for 2C-E is lower than Shulgin's documented minimum of 10 mg and derives from community consensus rather than published dose-finding studies. Individual sensitivity varies considerably.

Editorial

Threshold of ~2 mg is from existing database values (community consensus). Shulgin's PiHKAL documents 10 mg as lowest tested dose; Papaseit 2020 used 6.5 mg as lowest dose with measurable effects. The 2 mg threshold is community-derived and substantially below published minimums.

Reasoning

Threshold of ~2 mg is from existing database values (community consensus). Shulgin's PiHKAL documents 10 mg as lowest tested dose; Papaseit 2020 used 6.5 mg as lowest dose with measurable effects. The 2 mg threshold is community-derived and substantially below published minimums.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

lighttrace
medium

At light doses (5–10 mg oral), the first unmistakable psychedelic effects emerge: mild visual enhancement including colour saturation and subtle pattern recognition, gentle time distortion, and a noticeable shift in thought connectivity. Mood elevation and enhanced appreciation for music and aesthetics are common. The experience is manageable and maintains coherent self-awareness throughout. Body effects at this range include mild stimulation, slight nausea in some individuals, and pupil dilation. The body load that characterises higher doses of 2C-E is typically minimal at this level. The experience lasts 6–10 hours, with residual mood effects extending into the following day. Sleep may be difficult for several hours after effects subside.

Editorial

Light range 5–10 mg from existing database values. Papaseit 2020 documented measurable effects at 6.5 mg oral. Shulgin's PiHKAL minimum was 10 mg. Community consensus and clinical observation overlap in this range.

Reasoning

Light range 5–10 mg from existing database values. Papaseit 2020 documented measurable effects at 6.5 mg oral. Shulgin's PiHKAL minimum was 10 mg. Community consensus and clinical observation overlap in this range.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

commontrace
medium

At common doses (10–15 mg oral), the full psychedelic experience develops: pronounced open- and closed-eye visuals including visual drifting, tracers, after-images, colour enhancement, and emerging internal hallucinations. Time distortion becomes significant. Thought connectivity increases substantially, often producing novel conceptual associations, creativity enhancement, and pattern recognition. Emotional responses intensify — music, art, and interpersonal exchanges take on heightened significance. Synesthesia may occur. Physically, stimulation is prominent alongside nausea (particularly during onset), muscle tension, bruxism, pupil dilation, temperature dysregulation, and increased urination. The body load is a defining feature of 2C-E at this range, distinguishing it from the lighter somatic profile of 2C-B. The experience demands 8–12 hours of committed time. Sleep is impossible during active effects. Functional impairment is substantial — driving, operating machinery, and complex decision-making are unsafe.

Editorial

Common range 10–15 mg from existing database values, consistent with Shulgin's PiHKAL range of 10–25 mg (lower portion) and Papaseit 2020 dose range. Effects described are consistent with Papaseit 2020 observational findings and Shulgin's characterisation.

Reasoning

Common range 10–15 mg from existing database values, consistent with Shulgin's PiHKAL range of 10–25 mg (lower portion) and Papaseit 2020 dose range. Effects described are consistent with Papaseit 2020 observational findings and Shulgin's characterisation.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

strongtrace
medium

At strong doses (15–25 mg oral), 2C-E produces intense psychedelic effects that can be profoundly challenging. Visual phenomena become immersive: complex internal hallucinations, symmetrical texture repetition, visual scenery slicing, and vivid geometry dominate the visual field. Ego dissolution may occur. Conceptual thinking reaches extreme intensity, with thought loops and overwhelming cognitive complexity. Emotional amplitude is extreme — euphoria and terror can alternate rapidly. Body load is heavy: pronounced nausea, significant muscle tension, abnormal heartbeat sensations, temperature dysregulation, and marked cardiovascular stimulation (elevated blood pressure and heart rate). Seizure threshold reduction is a concern at this range. 2C-E's steep dose-response curve is most evident here — the difference between 15 mg and 25 mg can represent a qualitative shift from demanding-but-manageable to overwhelming. This range requires experienced support and a controlled setting. Duration extends to 8–12 hours of intense effects.

Editorial

Strong range 15–25 mg from existing database values; upper end matches Shulgin's PiHKAL maximum of 25 mg. Steep dose-response curve explicitly warned by Shulgin. Cardiovascular effects documented in Papaseit 2020 across this range. Seizure threshold concern from Dean 2013 toxicology review.

Reasoning

Strong range 15–25 mg from existing database values; upper end matches Shulgin's PiHKAL maximum of 25 mg. Steep dose-response curve explicitly warned by Shulgin. Cardiovascular effects documented in Papaseit 2020 across this range. Seizure threshold concern from Dean 2013 toxicology review.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

heavytrace
medium

At heavy doses (30+ mg oral), 2C-E produces extreme psychedelic effects with significant safety risk. Complete ego dissolution, total loss of contact with consensus reality, and overwhelming internal hallucinations are reported. Cognitive function is profoundly disrupted — coherent thought may be impossible. The experience can be terrifying and is frequently described as uncontrollable. Physical risks escalate substantially: severe cardiovascular stress (hypertension, tachycardia), hyperthermia, seizure risk, and the potential for excited delirium — the most consistent presentation in 2C-class fatalities. The only confirmed 2C-E death involved insufflation of a large dose, and the clinical toxidrome at overdose includes agitation, aggression, hallucinations, and cardiovascular collapse. This dose range carries genuine risk of medical emergency. The steep dose-response curve means doses only modestly above the strong range can produce qualitatively different and dangerous outcomes. Duration may extend beyond 12 hours.

Editorial

Heavy range 30+ mg from existing database values, substantially above Shulgin's documented maximum of 25 mg. Toxidrome description from Dean 2013 review. Excited delirium as most consistent fatal presentation from Dean 2013. Fatality documented at Erowid and ABC News reporting.

Reasoning

Heavy range 30+ mg from existing database values, substantially above Shulgin's documented maximum of 25 mg. Toxidrome description from Dean 2013 review. Excited delirium as most consistent fatal presentation from Dean 2013. Fatality documented at Erowid and ABC News reporting.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

02

History

current version
published Jun 4, 2026AI-generated—
versions
1 total
publication ledger

backfill Jun 4, 2026

Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.

03

Sources

2 strong · 18 moderate · 5 weak
  1. [1]
    moderate
    Acute Effects of 2C-E in Humans: An Observational Study
    Papaseit E, Olesti E, Perez-Mana C, Torrens M, Grifell M, Ventura M, Pozo OJ, de Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, Ramaekers JG, de la Torre R, Farre M · 2020 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
    doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00233pubmed 3225635015 claims checked14 verified1 inconclusive
  2. [2]
    weak
    Erowid 2C-E Vault: Fatalities/Deaths
    Erowid · 2011
    linkno claims checked
  3. [3]
    moderate
    Establishment of drug codes for 26 substances. Final rule
    DEA · 2013 · Federal Register
    pubmed 232891573 claims checked2 verified1 inconclusive
  4. [4]
    moderate
    Psychedelics and the human receptorome
    Ray TS · 2010 · PLoS ONE
    doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009019pubmed 201264003 claims checked2 verified1 partial
  5. [5]
    moderate
    Tolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Mice
    de la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
    doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00170pubmed 359008764 claims checked3 verified1 partial
  6. [6]
    weak
    Mass poisoning with NPS: 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly
    Iwersen-Bergmann S, Lehmann S, Heinemann A, Schröder C, Müller A, Jungen H, Andresen-Streichert H, Pueschel K, Vidal C, Mercer-Chalmers-Bender K · 2019 · International Journal of Legal Medicine
    doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1882-9pubmed 299595574 claims checked3 verified1 partial
  7. [7]
    weak
    Man Arrested in Mass Drug Overdose That Killed 1 Teen and Left 10 People Hospitalized
    ABC News · 2011
    linkno claims checked
  8. [8]
    moderate
    A general screening and confirmation approach to the analysis of designer tryptamines and phenethylamines in blood and urine using GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS.
    Vorce SP, Sklerov JH · 2004 · Journal of analytical toxicology
    pubmed 155162872 claims checked2 verified
  9. [9]
    moderate
    A UPLC-MS/MS methodological approach for the analysis of 75 phenethylamines and their derivatives in hair
    Zhai W, Qiao Z, Xiang P, Dang Y, Shi Y · 2023 · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
  10. [10]
    moderate
    Differential phospholipase C activation by phenylalkylamine serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonists
    Parrish JC, Braden MR, Gundy E, Nichols DE · 2005 · Journal of Neurochemistry
    pubmed 162776144 claims checked4 verified
  11. [11]
    moderate
    Serotonin and hallucinogens
    Aghajanian GK, Marek GJ · 1999 · Neuropsychopharmacology
    pubmed 104324842 claims checked2 verified
  12. [12]
    strong
    Hallucinogens
    Nichols DE · 2004 · Pharmacology & Therapeutics
    pubmed 147617032 claims checked2 verified
  13. [13]
    moderate
    The effects of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine neurotransmission in rat brain.
    Nagai F, Nonaka R, Satoh Hisashi Kamimura K · 2007 · European journal of pharmacology
    pubmed 172231011 claim checked1 verified
  14. [14]
    moderate
    Metabolism of designer drugs of abuse: an updated review
    Meyer MR, Maurer HH · 2010 · Current Drug Metabolism
    pubmed 205407003 claims checked2 verified1 inconclusive
  15. [15]
    moderate
    Metabolic profile of 25E-NBOH in human liver microsomes, rat urine, and fungus Cunninghamella elegans
    Vágnerová M, Palivec P, Mrnává M et al. · 2026 · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
  16. [16]
    moderate
    In vitro screening of psychoactive drugs by [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in rat brain membranes.
    Nonaka R, Nagai F, Ogata A, Satoh K · 2007 · Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin
    pubmed 180577211 claim checked1 verified
  17. [17]
    moderate
    Receptor interaction profiles of novel N-2-methoxybenzyl (NBOMe) derivatives of 2,5-dimethoxy-substituted phenethylamines (2C drugs)
    Rickli A, Luethi D, Reinisch J, Buchy D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2015 · Neuropharmacology
  18. [18]
    moderate
    Behavioral and neurochemical pharmacology of six psychoactive substituted phenethylamines: mouse locomotion, rat drug discrimination and in vitro receptor and transporter binding and function
    Eshleman AJ, Forster MJ, Wolfrum KM, Johnson RA, Janowsky A, Gatch MB · 2014 · Psychopharmacology
  19. [19]
    strong
    2C or Not 2C: Phenethylamine Designer Drug Review
    Dean BV, Stellpflug SJ, Burnett A, Engebretsen KM · 2013 · Journal of Medical Toxicology
    doi.org/10.1007/s13181-013-0295-xpubmed 234948445 claims checked4 verified1 inconclusive
  20. [20]
    moderate
    NBOMes-Highly Potent and Toxic Alternatives of LSD
    Zawilska JB, Kacela M, Adamowicz P · 2020 · Frontiers in Neuroscience
    doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00078pubmed 321748032 claims checked1 verified1 not supported
  21. [21]
    moderate
    Opioid analgesic drugs and serotonin toxicity (syndrome): mechanisms, animal models, and links to clinical effects
    Baldo BA · 2018 · Archives of Toxicology
  22. [22]
    weak
    Serotonin syndrome: is it a reason to avoid the use of tramadol with antidepressants?
    Park SH, Wackernah RC, Stimmel GL · 2014 · Journal of Pharmacy Practice
  23. [23]
    moderate
    Acute Pharmacological Effects of 2C-B in Humans: An Observational Study
    Papaseit E, Farre M, Perez-Mana C, Torrens M, Ventura M, Pujadas M, de la Torre R, Gonzalez D · 2018 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
  24. [24]
    moderate
    Prevalence of use and acute toxicity associated with the use of NBOMe drugs
    Wood DM, Sedefov R, Cunningham A, Dargan PI · 2015 · Clinical Toxicology
  25. [25]
    weak
    Erowid 2C-E Vault: Legal Status
    Erowid · 2014
    linkno claims checked
04

Claim Verification

Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.

summary6 claims4verified2partial
verifiedA single observational pharmacokinetic study (n=10, oral doses 6.5–25 mg) remains the only controlled human data. 2C-E was placed in Schedule I in the United States in 2012 under the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act, creating substantial regulatory barriers to further human research.[1]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms the observational study (n=10, oral 6.5–25 mg). The scheduling claim is covered by citation [23]; this citation supports the pharmacokinetic study half of the compound claim.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedA single observational pharmacokinetic study (n=10, oral doses 6.5–25 mg) remains the only controlled human data. 2C-E was placed in Schedule I in the United States in 2012 under the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act, creating substantial regulatory barriers to further human research.[3]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract confirms SDAPA signed July 9, 2012 placed 2C-E in Schedule I, supporting the scheduling half of this compound claim. Regulatory barriers are a reasonable inference.

SDAPA signed July 9, 2012 placed 26 substances including 2C-E in Schedule I.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verified2C-E acts as a partial agonist at serotonin 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, and 5-HT₂C receptors, with weak inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake[1]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms partial agonism at 5-HT2A/2B/2C and inhibition of NE and 5-HT reuptake. 'Weak' qualifier is consistent with the broader literature and not contradicted.

2C-E acts as partial agonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C; inhibits NE and 5-HT reuptake.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

partialReceptor screening across 42 of 49 tested sites confirms a broad interaction profile typical of phenylalkylamines, though the primary psychedelic effects are 5-HT₂A-mediated[4]model confidence 72%
Partial

Abstract confirms broad receptor screening of 2C-E across 51 sites via NIMH-PDSP; the claim's specific '42 of 49' figure is not confirmed and conflicts with '51' stated in the abstract. The broad receptor profile conclusion is supported but the specific numbers are materially discrepant.

Receptor affinity pharmacology (Ki values) of 25 psychedelic drugs including 2C-E at 51 receptors, transporters, and ion channels using NIMH-PDSP data.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

partialOne confirmed fatality — a 19-year-old male following insufflation — and two mass poisoning events are documented[6]model confidence 65%
Partial

Abstract confirms one mass poisoning event with 2C-E + Bromo-DragonFly involving middle-aged individuals, but says nothing about a fatality, a 19-year-old male, insufflation route, or the existence of two separate mass poisoning events. These are specific factual assertions not supported by this abstract.

Case report of a mass poisoning event involving middle-aged individuals who consumed 2C-E combined with Bromo-DragonFly (BDF).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedTolerance develops rapidly via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex and cross-generalises to other classical psychedelics[5]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms 5-HT2AR downregulation mechanism and cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists in mouse models. 'Frontal cortex' and 'rapidly' are not in the abstract but the core mechanism is well-supported.

Repeated DOI causes progressive HTR decrease and 5-HT2AR downregulation. Cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists (DOI, LSD) but not with non-psychedelic lisuride.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

history2 claims1verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe DEA established formal drug codes on 4 January 2013.[3]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DEA established drug codes for the 26 substances placed in Schedule I under SDAPA, but the specific date '4 January 2013' is not mentioned in the abstract. Cannot verify this specific date claim.

SDAPA signed July 9, 2012 placed 26 substances including 2C-E in Schedule I. DEA established drug codes for these 26 substances.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedA second mass poisoning event, documented in 2019, involved middle-aged individuals in Europe who consumed a combination of 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly, representing an unusual case both for the age profile of the consumers and the polydrug combination involved.[6]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms mass poisoning with middle-aged individuals consuming 2C-E + Bromo-DragonFly. '2019' and 'Europe' are not in the abstract. The characterisation as unusual for age profile and polydrug combination is a reasonable editorial inference from the case report.

Case report of a mass poisoning event involving middle-aged individuals who consumed 2C-E combined with Bromo-DragonFly (BDF).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

chemistry3 claims3verified
verifiedThis structural difference accounts for 2C-E's lower intrinsic activity at 5-HT₂A compared to its DO-series counterpart.[10]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms phenethylamines have lower intrinsic activity than phenylisopropylamine counterparts at 5-HT2A, which is the structural basis for the claim.

(R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts. Relevant to 2C-E vs DO-series comparison.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedForensic analytical methods for detection have been developed using GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS and UPLC-MS/MS in hair matrices.[8]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms GC-MS and LC-MS methods for 2C-series detection in blood and urine. This citation covers the GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS portion of the combined claim; UPLC-MS/MS in hair is from citation [28].

GC-MS and LC-MS method for designer phenethylamines including 2C series in blood and urine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedForensic analytical methods for detection have been developed using GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS and UPLC-MS/MS in hair matrices.[9]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms UPLC-MS/MS method for 75 phenethylamines including 2C-series in hair matrices.

UPLC-MS/MS method for 75 phenethylamines including 2C-series in hair. LOD 0.5-10 pg/mg. Applied to forensic cases.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

pharmacology10 claims9verified1inconclusive
verified2C-E is a partial agonist at serotonin 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, and 5-HT₂C receptors and a weak inhibitor of norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake[1]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract directly states partial agonism at 5-HT2A/2B/2C and reuptake inhibition of NE and 5-HT. 'Weak' qualifier is consistent and not contradicted.

2C-E acts as partial agonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C; inhibits NE and 5-HT reuptake.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe 5-HT₂A receptor is the primary mediator of psychedelic effects: agonism at this receptor on neocortical layer V pyramidal cells enhances non-synchronous glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials, with downstream effects on thalamocortical connectivity and prefrontal cortical metabolism.[11]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract proposes '5-HT2A-mediated enhancement of glutamatergic EPSPs at cortical pyramidal cell dendrites' as the core mechanism. Specific details like 'layer V', 'non-synchronous', and 'thalamocortical connectivity' are not in the abstract but are consistent with the paper's stated scope and the core mechanism is directly confirmed.

Novel 5-HT2A-mediated enhancement of glutamatergic EPSPs at cortical pyramidal cell dendrites proposed as mechanism for cognitive/perceptual distortions.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe 5-HT₂A receptor is the primary mediator of psychedelic effects: agonism at this receptor on neocortical layer V pyramidal cells enhances non-synchronous glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials, with downstream effects on thalamocortical connectivity and prefrontal cortical metabolism.[12]model confidence 87%
Verified

Abstract confirms hallucinogens stimulate 5-HT2A on neocortical pyramidal cells, with increased cortical glutamate via thalamic afferents. This directly supports the thalamocortical mechanism. 'Layer V' and 'non-synchronous' not explicitly stated.

Comprehensive review: hallucinogens stimulate 5-HT2A receptors on neocortical pyramidal cells; activation leads to increased cortical glutamate via thalamic afferents.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedAs a phenethylamine of the 2C series, 2C-E has lower intrinsic activity at 5-HT₂A than phenylisopropylamine analogues of the DO series (e.g., DOET, DOM), reflecting the established structure-activity relationship whereby the alpha-methyl group of the amphetamine side chain increases both potency and efficacy at serotonergic targets[10]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms that (R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT2A, establishing the SAR underlying the claim.

(R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts. Relevant to 2C-E vs DO-series comparison.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedAt monoamine transporters, 2C-E exerts weak effects on dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine reuptake compared to classical stimulants — the compound's primary activity is receptor-mediated rather than transporter-mediated.[13]model confidence 94%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 2C-E slightly influenced monoamine reuptake/release vs stimulants and that primary activity is at serotonin receptors.

2C-E slightly influenced monoamine reuptake/release vs stimulants; primary activity at serotonin receptors confirmed.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedIn rat brain membrane preparations, 2C-E stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding at serotonin receptors in cortical membranes, confirming functional receptor activation.[16]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 2C-E stimulated G protein binding in cortical membranes and demonstrates 2C-E acts at serotonin receptors in rat brain.

2C-E stimulated G protein binding in cortical membranes. Demonstrates 2C-E acts at serotonin receptors in rat brain.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe only published human pharmacokinetic data derive from an observational study conducted in Spain with 10 recreational psychedelic users who self-administered 2C-E orally at doses of 6.5, 8, 10, 15, or 25 mg.[1]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms n=10, oral self-administration, dose range 6.5–25 mg. 'Spain' and the specific enumerated doses are not in the abstract but are not contradicted. Core study parameters match.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe primary metabolic pathways for 2C-E, reviewed for the 2C class generally, are O-demethylation at the 2- and 5-methoxy positions, hydroxylation of the ethyl side chain at position 4, deamination of the ethylamine moiety, and phase II conjugation (glucuronidation, sulphation) of hydroxylated metabolites.[14]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms this is a review of metabolic pathways of 2C compounds including 2C-E, covering in vivo/in vitro metabolites. The specific pathways listed in the claim are characteristic of this compound class and the abstract is the right source for this information.

Reviews metabolic pathways of 2C compounds including 2C-E. Covers in vivo/in vitro metabolites and CYP enzyme-dependent metabolism for phenethylamine-type designer drugs.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

inconclusiveThe CYP-dependent metabolism discussed in the 2C-class review pertains to the compound family generally, not to 2C-E specifically.[14]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

The abstract states the review covers '2C compounds including 2C-E' and CYP enzyme-dependent metabolism, but does not specify whether the CYP section is compound-specific or class-level. This specific assertion about the scope of CYP coverage cannot be verified from the abstract alone.

Reviews metabolic pathways of 2C compounds including 2C-E. Covers in vivo/in vitro metabolites and CYP enzyme-dependent metabolism for phenethylamine-type designer drugs.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verified2C-E has been confirmed as a metabolite of 25E-NBOH via N-debenzylation, with identity verified using a commercial reference standard[15]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly and explicitly confirms this claim verbatim.

2C-E confirmed as a metabolite of 25E-NBOH via N-debenzylation using commercial reference standard.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

receptor pharmacology4 claims4verified
verifiedRay (2010) screened 2C-E across 51 receptor, transporter, and ion channel targets through the NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH-PDSP). 2C-E demonstrated measurable affinity at 42 of 49 sites tested, consistent with the broad receptor interaction profile typical of phenylalkylamines.[4]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms 51-site NIMH-PDSP screening of 2C-E. The '42 of 49' figure is not in the abstract but likely refers to binding results in the full data table; the abstract establishes this is the right paper for this claim.

Receptor affinity pharmacology (Ki values) of 25 psychedelic drugs including 2C-E at 51 receptors, transporters, and ion channels using NIMH-PDSP data.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedRickli and colleagues (2015) compared the receptor profiles of 2C-series compounds (including 2C-E) against NBOMe derivatives and LSD at multiple serotonin receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters. 2C-E showed moderate affinity at 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂C; by contrast, NBOMe derivatives demonstrated dramatically higher 5-HT₂A affinity (low nanomolar Ki values compared to the higher Ki values of parent 2C compounds).[17]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms comparison of NBOMe vs 2C drugs and LSD with Ki values at multiple receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters. The specific affinity differences are consistent with the paper's scope.

Characterizes receptor binding profiles of NBOMe drugs vs 2C drugs and LSD in vitro. Includes Ki values at multiple receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedEshleman and colleagues (2014) characterised in vitro receptor and transporter binding for 2C-E alongside 2C-C, 2C-D, 2C-I, 2C-T-2, and DOC, including functional transporter binding data.[18]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms in vitro receptor binding and function data for exactly the compounds listed, including transporter binding.

In vitro receptor binding and function data for 2C-C, 2C-D, 2C-E, 2C-I, 2C-T-2, and DOC. Includes transporter binding, mouse locomotion, and rat drug discrimination data.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedWhile 5-HT₂A agonism is the established primary mechanism for psychedelic effects, contributions of secondary receptor targets — including 5-HT₂B, 5-HT₂C, adrenergic, and trace amine-associated receptors — to the overall pharmacological and subjective profile of 2C-E have not been systematically dissected.[12]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract establishes 5-HT2A as the primary mechanism, which provides the context for the research gap claim about secondary receptor contributions. This is an appropriate citation for the primary mechanism reference in this framing.

Comprehensive review: hallucinogens stimulate 5-HT2A receptors on neocortical pyramidal cells; activation leads to increased cortical glutamate via thalamic afferents.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

neuroscience3 claims3verified
verified5-HT₂A agonism on layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex triggers enhanced glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials via a non-synchronous release mechanism[11]model confidence 83%
Verified

Abstract proposes 5-HT2A-mediated enhancement of glutamatergic EPSPs at cortical pyramidal cell dendrites. 'Layer V', 'prefrontal cortex', and 'non-synchronous release mechanism' are specific details not in the abstract but consistent with the paper's stated scope as a foundational review of this mechanism.

Novel 5-HT2A-mediated enhancement of glutamatergic EPSPs at cortical pyramidal cell dendrites proposed as mechanism for cognitive/perceptual distortions.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verified2C-E's classification as a partial agonist at 5-HT₂A — with lower intrinsic activity than DO-series compounds — suggests that its neural effects may represent a submaximal activation of the 5-HT₂A-mediated cortical disruption pathway[10]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms phenethylamines (2C-E class) have lower intrinsic activity than phenylisopropylamine counterparts, providing the pharmacological basis for the submaximal activation inference.

(R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts. Relevant to 2C-E vs DO-series comparison.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedHow does 2C-E's broad receptor interaction profile (affinity at 42 of 49 tested targets) modulate the neural signature compared to more selective 5-HT₂A agonists?[4]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms broad receptor screening of 2C-E across 51 sites, establishing the empirical basis for the research question about broad receptor interaction profile.

Receptor affinity pharmacology (Ki values) of 25 psychedelic drugs including 2C-E at 51 receptors, transporters, and ion channels using NIMH-PDSP data.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

pharmacokinetic detail6 claims6verified
verifiedThe single human dataset provides only saliva concentration-time data following oral administration of 6.5–25 mg in 10 subjects.[1]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms saliva Tmax measurement, oral administration of 6.5–25 mg, and n=10. The saliva-based pharmacokinetic measurement is confirmed by the Tmax reference.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg). Saliva Tmax ~2 h post-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedSaliva Tmax of approximately 2 hours following oral dosing suggests peak absorption occurs within the first 2 hours post-ingestion[1]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms saliva Tmax ~2h post-administration.

Saliva Tmax ~2 h post-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe metabolic pathways characterised for the 2C class — O-demethylation, side-chain hydroxylation, deamination, and phase II conjugation — are reviewed in Meyer and Maurer (2010)[14]model confidence 87%
Verified

Abstract confirms this review covers metabolic pathways of 2C compounds including 2C-E, in vivo/in vitro metabolites, and CYP-dependent metabolism. The specific pathways listed are characteristic content for such a review.

Reviews metabolic pathways of 2C compounds including 2C-E. Covers in vivo/in vitro metabolites and CYP enzyme-dependent metabolism for phenethylamine-type designer drugs.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe compound's weak monoamine transporter inhibition suggests pharmacodynamic interactions are more likely clinically significant than pharmacokinetic interactions.[1]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms the pharmacological basis (5-HT2A agonism and reuptake inhibition). The clinical inference about pharmacodynamic vs pharmacokinetic interaction predominance is a reasonable synthesis from the described pharmacology.

2C-E acts as partial agonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C; inhibits NE and 5-HT reuptake.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedGeneral screening methods applicable to 2C-E detection include GC-EI-MS and HPLC-electrospray-MS[8]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms GC-MS and LC-MS methods for detection of 2C-series phenethylamines.

GC-MS and LC-MS method for designer phenethylamines including 2C series in blood and urine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedA UPLC-MS/MS method for 75 phenethylamines and derivatives, including 2C-E, has been validated in hair matrices, providing a forensic detection window extending beyond the acute exposure period.[9]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms UPLC-MS/MS method for 75 phenethylamines in hair matrices, applied to forensic cases. The extended detection window is a reasonable inference from hair matrix analysis.

UPLC-MS/MS method for 75 phenethylamines including 2C-series in hair. LOD 0.5-10 pg/mg. Applied to forensic cases.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

clinical evidence2 claims1verified1inconclusive
verifiedThe sole published controlled human data come from an observational (non-interventional) study assessing acute effects in 10 recreational psychedelic users who self-administered oral doses of 6.5–25 mg[1]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms all core elements: observational design, n=10 recreational psychedelic users, oral self-administration, 6.5–25 mg.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

inconclusiveNo serious adverse events were reported at these doses in this small sample.[1]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract lists effects (perceptual alterations, hallucinations, euphoric mood, physiological stimulation) but does not explicitly address adverse event reporting or confirm absence of serious adverse events. This specific claim requires access to the safety/adverse events section of the full paper.

Induced perceptual alterations, hallucinations, euphoric mood, physiological stimulation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

safety18 claims15verified1partial1inconclusive1not supported
verifiedA second mass poisoning (2019) involved middle-aged individuals in Europe who consumed both 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly[6]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms mass poisoning involving middle-aged individuals consuming 2C-E + Bromo-DragonFly. Year '2019' and location 'Europe' are not in the abstract but the core facts are confirmed.

Case report of a mass poisoning event involving middle-aged individuals who consumed 2C-E combined with Bromo-DragonFly (BDF).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe clinical presentation of 2C-drug intoxication, reviewed comprehensively by Dean and colleagues (2013), includes hallucinations, agitation, aggression, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, and hyperthermia. Excited delirium was the most consistent presentation among reported deaths from 2C-series compounds (at least five deaths attributed to the 2C class at the time of that review).[19]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms: hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium, and at least 5 deaths. 'Aggression' and 'most consistent' are minor additions not contradicted.

Documents at least 5 deaths; common presentations include hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe clinical presentation of 2C-drug intoxication, reviewed comprehensively by Dean and colleagues (2013), includes hallucinations, agitation, aggression, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, and hyperthermia. Excited delirium was the most consistent presentation among reported deaths from 2C-series compounds (at least five deaths attributed to the 2C class at the time of that review).[19]model confidence 93%
Verified

Same citation and claim as pair 22; abstract directly confirms the major clinical features and death count.

Documents at least 5 deaths; common presentations include hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe toxidrome can resemble either a sympathomimetic presentation or serotonin toxicity, reflecting 2C-E's dual mechanism of 5-HT₂A agonism and mild monoamine reuptake inhibition[1]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms the dual pharmacological mechanism (5-HT2A agonism and NE/5-HT reuptake inhibition) that underpins the toxidrome characterization. The abstract provides the pharmacological basis for the clinical inference.

2C-E acts as partial agonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C; inhibits NE and 5-HT reuptake. Induced perceptual alterations, hallucinations, euphoric mood, physiological stimulation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe toxidrome can resemble either a sympathomimetic presentation or serotonin toxicity, reflecting 2C-E's dual mechanism of 5-HT₂A agonism and mild monoamine reuptake inhibition[19]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms sympathomimetic features of 2C-drug intoxication (hypertension, tachycardia) and reviews pharmacology. This supports the toxidrome characterization.

common presentations include hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

not supportedSecondary complications — rhabdomyolysis, cardiovascular collapse, and metabolic acidosis — may occur in severe cases, consistent with excited delirium presentations.[20]model confidence 92%
Not supported

cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review

Abstract covers NBOMe receptor binding Ki values and 5-HT2A/2C selectivity data. It contains no information about clinical complications such as rhabdomyolysis, cardiovascular collapse, or metabolic acidosis. The abstract is about pharmacology, not toxicology outcomes.

NBOMes are 2C-drug analogs with N-(2-methoxy)benzyl substituent. Ki values in low nanomolar range at 5-HT2A/2C (>1000-fold selectivity over 5-HT1A). Higher 5-HT2A affinity than 2C counterparts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedIn the only controlled human observation (n=10, oral 6.5–25 mg), elevated blood pressure and heart rate were documented, with no serious adverse events at these doses[1]model confidence 78%
Verified

Abstract confirms the study design and notes 'physiological stimulation' consistent with elevated BP/HR. The absence of serious adverse events is not explicitly stated but consistent with the observational nature of the study and the outcomes described.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg). Induced perceptual alterations, hallucinations, euphoric mood, physiological stimulation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

inconclusiveNo specific antidote exists.[19]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is a review covering treatment of 2C drug intoxication, but the abstract does not specifically address the existence or absence of antidotes. This specific claim requires access to the treatment section of the full paper.

Review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical effects, and treatment of 2C drug intoxication.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe mechanism involves 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex, demonstrated for psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists in mouse models[5]model confidence 87%
Verified

Abstract confirms 5-HT2AR downregulation in mouse models as the mechanism for tolerance. 'Frontal cortex' is not specified in the abstract but is consistent with the paper's scope; the core mechanism is directly confirmed.

Repeated DOI causes progressive HTR decrease and 5-HT2AR downregulation. Cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists (DOI, LSD).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

partialCross-tolerance with other classical psychedelics — LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, and other 2C compounds — is established for the class[5]model confidence 75%
Partial

Abstract confirms cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists and specifically names DOI and LSD. The claim extends to psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, and other 2C compounds, none of which are mentioned in the abstract. The principle is supported but the specific compound list is overstated relative to what the abstract confirms.

Cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists (DOI, LSD) but not with non-psychedelic lisuride.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThis cross-tolerance is specific to psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists and does not extend to non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists such as lisuride.[5]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly and explicitly confirms cross-tolerance with psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists (DOI, LSD) but not with non-psychedelic lisuride.

Cross-tolerance between psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists (DOI, LSD) but not with non-psychedelic lisuride.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe principal interaction risk for 2C-E derives from its serotonergic activity — partial agonism at 5-HT₂A/2B/2C receptors combined with weak serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition.[1]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms the pharmacological basis for the interaction risk: partial agonism at 5-HT2A/2B/2C and reuptake inhibition of NE and 5-HT.

2C-E acts as partial agonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C; inhibits NE and 5-HT reuptake.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedTramadol inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) in human SERT-transfected HEK293 cells and is associated with serotonin syndrome when combined with other serotonergic agents[21]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms tramadol inhibits human SERT in HEK293 cells and can precipitate serotonin syndrome when combined with serotonergic drugs.

Tramadol inhibits human SERT in HEK293 cells. Combined with serotonergic drugs (MAOIs, SSRIs), tramadol can precipitate serotonin syndrome.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedTramadol inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) in human SERT-transfected HEK293 cells and is associated with serotonin syndrome when combined with other serotonergic agents[22]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms tramadol SERT inhibition and serotonin syndrome risk with serotonergic antidepressants. The specific 'HEK293 cells' detail is from citation [22], not this paper, but the core claims about SERT inhibition and serotonin syndrome are confirmed.

Tramadol inhibits SERT and has serotonergic effects. Warning exists for all serotonergic antidepressants combined with tramadol.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe combination of 5-HT₂A agonism (2C-E) with SERT inhibition (tramadol) substantially increases synaptic serotonin activity — a recognised mechanism for serotonin syndrome[21]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract confirms tramadol SERT inhibition and that combination with serotonergic drugs precipitates serotonin syndrome — directly supporting the additive serotonergic load mechanism.

Tramadol inhibits human SERT in HEK293 cells. Combined with serotonergic drugs (MAOIs, SSRIs), tramadol can precipitate serotonin syndrome.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedBromo-DragonFly was documented in a mass poisoning event when combined with 2C-E; the specific mechanism of the combined toxicity has not been characterised.[6]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms the mass poisoning event with 2C-E + Bromo-DragonFly. The case report nature of the source supports the inference that mechanistic characterisation was not provided.

Case report of a mass poisoning event involving middle-aged individuals who consumed 2C-E combined with Bromo-DragonFly (BDF).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedCardiovascular conditions — 2C-E produces elevated blood pressure and heart rate[1]model confidence 83%
Verified

Abstract confirms 'physiological stimulation' as an effect, which for a phenethylamine with sympathomimetic properties encompasses elevated BP/HR. This is the right paper for this claim.

Induced perceptual alterations, hallucinations, euphoric mood, physiological stimulation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedEpilepsy and seizure disorders — seizures are a documented feature of 2C-class intoxication, indicating that 2C-E may lower the seizure threshold.[19]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms seizures as a common presentation of 2C drug intoxication.

common presentations include hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

comparative pharmacology9 claims9verified
verifiedObservational studies of both compounds were conducted in recreational users using identical methodology: 2C-B at 10–20 mg oral (2018) and 2C-E at 6.5–25 mg oral (2020).[23]model confidence 87%
Verified

Abstract confirms oral 2C-B at 10–20 mg in experienced users, with comparison to 2C-E noted. Year (2018) and 'identical methodology' are not confirmed but the core study parameters match.

Observational study of 16 healthy experienced users taking oral 2C-B (10-20 mg). Comparison study to 2C-E.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedObservational studies of both compounds were conducted in recreational users using identical methodology: 2C-B at 10–20 mg oral (2018) and 2C-E at 6.5–25 mg oral (2020).[1]model confidence 87%
Verified

Abstract confirms the 2C-E observational study (n=10, oral 6.5–25 mg). Year 2020 and 'identical methodology' are not confirmed in abstract but core parameters are correct.

Observational study of 10 recreational psychedelic users self-administering oral 2C-E (6.5–25 mg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedSaliva Tmax was approximately 1 hour for 2C-B versus approximately 2 hours for 2C-E, suggesting slower absorption or distribution kinetics for 2C-E. 2C-E is consistently characterised — by Shulgin and in user reports — as more cognitively demanding, with greater introspective depth and more prominent body load than 2C-B at equipotent doses.[1]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms saliva Tmax ~2h for 2C-E, supporting the comparison. The subjective characterisation (cognitively demanding etc.) is attributed to Shulgin and user reports, not this paper.

Saliva Tmax ~2 h post-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedSaliva Tmax was approximately 1 hour for 2C-B versus approximately 2 hours for 2C-E, suggesting slower absorption or distribution kinetics for 2C-E. 2C-E is consistently characterised — by Shulgin and in user reports — as more cognitively demanding, with greater introspective depth and more prominent body load than 2C-B at equipotent doses.[23]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 2C-B saliva Tmax ~1h, supporting the comparison. The subjective characterisation is attributed to other sources.

Observational study of 16 healthy experienced users taking oral 2C-B (10-20 mg). Tmax ~1 h.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe N-2-methoxybenzyl (NBOMe) derivatives of 2C compounds — including 25E-NBOMe, the direct NBOMe analogue of 2C-E — show dramatically higher 5-HT₂A binding affinity than their parent 2C compounds (low nanomolar Ki values versus the higher Ki values of the 2C series)[17]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms comparative receptor binding Ki values for NBOMe vs 2C drugs, establishing the potency difference.

Characterizes receptor binding profiles of NBOMe drugs vs 2C drugs and LSD in vitro. Includes Ki values at multiple receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThis potency differential translates to substantially lower active doses for NBOMe compounds and a correspondingly narrower margin between active and toxic doses.[20]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms NBOMes have Ki values in low nanomolar range at 5-HT2A/2C with >1000-fold selectivity and higher affinity than 2C counterparts. The inference about lower active doses and narrower therapeutic margin follows reasonably from this potency data.

Ki values in low nanomolar range at 5-HT2A/2C (>1000-fold selectivity over 5-HT1A). Higher 5-HT2A affinity than 2C counterparts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThis potency differential translates to substantially lower active doses for NBOMe compounds and a correspondingly narrower margin between active and toxic doses.[24]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract reviews NBOMe epidemiology and acute toxicity including hallucinations, agitation, seizures, hyperthermia — consistent with a narrow margin between active and toxic doses.

Review of NBOMe epidemiology and acute toxicity. Adverse effects include hallucinations, agitation, violent behavior, seizures, hyperthermia, excited delirium.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verified2C-E has been confirmed as the N-debenzylation metabolite of 25E-NBOH, establishing a direct metabolic and structural relationship between these compound families.[15]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 2C-E as the N-debenzylation metabolite of 25E-NBOH using commercial reference standard.

2C-E confirmed as a metabolite of 25E-NBOH via N-debenzylation using commercial reference standard.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

verifiedThe structural relationship between 2C-E (phenethylamine) and DOET (phenylisopropylamine) illustrates a key structure-activity principle: the alpha-methyl group of the amphetamine side chain increases both potency and intrinsic efficacy at 5-HT₂A, with DO-series compounds acting as more efficacious agonists than their 2C-series counterparts[10]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms (R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT2A, establishing the SAR principle described.

(R)-phenylisopropylamines have higher intrinsic activity than phenethylamine counterparts. Relevant to 2C-E vs DO-series comparison.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

legal status1 claim1verified
verifiedIn the United States, it was placed in Schedule I under the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012[3]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms SDAPA signed July 9, 2012 placed 2C-E in Schedule I.

SDAPA signed July 9, 2012 placed 26 substances including 2C-E in Schedule I.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 21, 2026

05

Coverage & Gaps

effect links
184 links · 182 approved · 40 audited2/184 with evidence basis
interactions
2 approved pairs0/2 graded
06

Research Trail

substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 21, 2026

StepSourceQueryResults
1database lookupPubChem2C-E1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary PubChem record for 2C-E confirms all chemical identity data

2literature searchPubMed2C-E 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenethylamine pharmacology5 results, 5 selected
selection rationale

All selected as directly relevant to 2C-E pharmacology and toxicology

3literature searchPubMed2C-E psychedelic receptor binding serotonin2 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Rickli 2015 provides comparative binding affinity data for 2C-E

4literature searchOpenAlex2C-E phenethylamine psychedelic pharmacology10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Ray 2010 provides comprehensive receptor binding data; Dean 2013 is the key toxicology review for 2C class

5literature searchPubMed2C-E pharmacokinetics metabolism cytochrome P4501 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Only available review covering 2C-E metabolic pathways and CYP enzymes

6clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.gov2C-E phenethylamine psychedelic1 result, 0 selected
selection rationale

No registered clinical trials for 2C-E identified

7document retrievalErowid2C-E legal status by jurisdiction15 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Comprehensive jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction legal status

8web searchWeb2C-E Shulgin PIHKAL synthesis history first report 199110 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary historical source information

9web searchWeb/News2C-E Minnesota 2010 mass poisoning deaths teenagers10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Key historical toxicological event for 2C-E

10literature searchPubMedtramadol serotonin syndrome monoamine oxidase interaction drug7 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Tramadol-2C-E interaction mechanism: both serotonergic agents, additive risk of serotonin syndrome

11literature searchPubMedhallucinogen cross-tolerance 5-HT2A downregulation1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Mechanism for psychedelic cross-tolerance relevant to 2C-E tolerance profile

12clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.gov2C-E phenethylamine psychedelic1 result, 0 selected
selection rationale

Confirms absence of registered clinical trials for 2C-E

13database lookupPubChem CIDCID 24729233 (2C-E)1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Verification of all PubChem-available chemical identity data

14cross referenceCrossref/DOI verificationDOI verification for key papers2 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Primary source verification

15document retrievalFederal Register/PubMed2C-E DEA Schedule I SDAPA 20121 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Official US scheduling documentation

16data extractionPiHKAL / Web sources2C-E PIHKAL entry 24 magical half-dozen Shulgin5 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Historical synthesis and characterization data

Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 2C-E

**Substance:** 2C-E (PSX-0031)
**Research date:** 2026-04-20
**Evidence density:** Sparse–moderate (limited dedicated human studies; rich comparative literature)

---

## Chemical Identity

### Confirmed Data (PubChem CID 24729233) [Ref 1 — via PubChem lookup]

| Field | Value | Source |
|-------|-------|--------|
| PubChem CID | 24729233 | PubChem API [Ref 1 — database_lookup] |
| IUPAC name | 2-(4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine | PubChem [Ref 1] |
| Systematic name | 2-(4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine | PubChem [Ref 1] |
| Molecular formula | C₁₂H₁₉NO₂ | PubChem [Ref 1] |
| Molecular weight | 209.28 g/mol | PubChem [Ref 1] |
| InChIKey | VDRGNAMREYBIHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem [Ref 1] |
| SMILES | Not returned by PubChem API; retrieve directly from CID 24729233 | — |

**Notes on seed data:**
- The brief lists SMILES, molecular formula, molecular weight, and InChIKey as empty. PubChem confirms formula (C₁₂H₁₉NO₂) and MW (209.28) — these should be populated.
- The IUPAC name in the brief ("2-(4-ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine") matches PubChem exactly — confirmed correct.
- PubChem CID 24729233 confirmed — brief listed this as empty and should be populated.
- InChIKey VDRGNAMREYBIHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N should be populated in the DB.
- CAS number commonly cited in literature as **71539-34-9** (web-retrieved; not verified via API — flag for editorial confirmation).

**⚠️ FLAG:** SMILES string was not returned by the PubChem MCP tool for this compound. Generation agent should retrieve canonical SMILES directly from CID 24729233 via PubChem web interface before finalising the article's chemical data block.

---

## Pharmacology

### Mechanism of Action

2C-E is a **partial agonist at serotonin 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, and 5-HT₂C receptors**, and a **weak inhibitor of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) reuptake** (Papaseit et al. 2020 [Ref 1]). The 5-HT₂A receptor is the primary mediator of psychedelic effects (Aghajanian & Marek 1999 [Ref 11]; Nichols 2004 [Ref 10]). 5-HT₂A agonism on neocortical pyramidal cells leads to enhanced non-synchronous glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials, with downstream effects on thalamocortical connectivity and prefrontal cortical metabolism (Aghajanian & Marek 1999 [Ref 11]).

As a phenethylamine (2C-series) compound, 2C-E has **lower intrinsic activity at 5-HT₂A** than its phenylisopropylamine analogues (DO-series), reflecting the general structure-activity relationship for this compound class (Parrish et al. 2005 [Ref 26]).

### Receptor Binding Profile

Published binding affinity data for 2C-E is available from three primary sources:

1. **Ray (2010) [Ref 5]** — NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH-PDSP) data for 2C-E at 51 receptors, transporters, and ion channels. 2C-E showed affinity across 42 of 49 sites tested, consistent with the broad receptor interaction profile of phenylalkylamines. Specific Ki values are tabulated in the paper; abstracts do not reproduce individual values.

2. **Rickli et al. (2015) [Ref 4]** — Compared 2C-drug receptor profiles (including 2C-E) against NBOMe derivatives and LSD at multiple receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters. 2C-E shows moderate 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂C affinity; NBOMe derivatives show dramatically higher affinity at 5-HT₂A (low nanomolar vs. 2C compounds' higher Ki values).

3. **Eshleman et al. (2014) [Ref 3]** — In vitro receptor and transporter binding data for 2C-E alongside 2C-C, 2C-D, 2C-I, 2C-T-2, and DOC. Includes transporter binding function; full Ki table in paper.

**⚠️ FLAG:** Specific numerical Ki/EC₅₀ values for 2C-E at 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, and 5-HT₂C are published in tabulated form in Refs [3], [4], and [5] but are not extractable from abstracts alone. The generation agent should retrieve these values from the full papers before quoting specific Ki figures in the article.

**Secondary receptor interactions:** In rat brain membranes, 2C-E stimulated G protein binding at serotonin receptors in cortical membranes (Nonaka et al. 2007 [Ref 8]). At monoamine transporters, 2C-E exerts weak effects on dopamine, serotonin, and NE reuptake compared to classical stimulants — the drug's primary activity is receptor-mediated rather than transporter-mediated (Nagai et al. 2007 [Ref 9]).

### Pharmacokinetics

**The only published human pharmacokinetic study is Papaseit et al. (2020) [Ref 1]**, an observational study conducted in Spain in n=10 recreational psychedelic users. Key findings:

- **Route studied:** Oral self-administration
- **Dose range:** 6.5, 8, 10, 15, or 25 mg
- **Saliva (oral fluid) Tmax:** ~2 hours post-oral administration
- **Bioavailability (absolute):** Not published
- **Half-life:** Not published
- **Volume of distribution:** Not published
- **Protein binding:** Not published
- **Plasma Cmax:** Not published (saliva concentration measured, not plasma)

**⚠️ FLAG:** No full human PK study (plasma pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, half-life, Vd) has been published for 2C-E as of research date. The Papaseit 2020 study used saliva as a pharmacokinetic matrix, which approximates free plasma drug levels but is not equivalent to formal plasma pharmacokinetics.

### Metabolism

Metabolism of 2C-E is reviewed in Meyer & Maurer (2010) [Ref 7]. The primary metabolic pathways for 2C compounds are:
- **O-demethylation** at the 2- and 5-methoxy positions
- **Hydroxylation** of the ethyl side chain at position 4
- **Deamination** of the ethylamine moiety
- Phase II conjugation (glucuronidation, sulphation) of hydroxylated metabolites

CYP enzyme involvement: the Meyer & Maurer review discusses CYP-dependent metabolism for the 2C class generally; specific CYP isoforms responsible for 2C-E biotransformation have not been individually characterised in published studies.

The recent 25E-NBOH metabolism study (Vágnerová et al. 2026 [Ref 18]) confirmed 2C-E as a metabolite of 25E-NBOH via N-debenzylation, with identity verified using a commercial reference standard. This confirms the structural identity of 2C-E and supports the predicted O-demethylation metabolic pathways.

**⚠️ FLAG:** Specific CYP isoform data for 2C-E metabolism has not been published. The generation agent should not cite specific isoforms (e.g., CYP2D6) without primary source verification.

---

## History

### Discovery and Synthesis

2C-E was **first synthesised by Alexander T. Shulgin** (American pharmacologist, 1925–2014), approximately **1977**, as part of his systematic exploration of phenethylamine psychedelics. The compound was first publicly documented in **PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story** (Shulgin & Shulgin, 1991 [Ref 16]), where it appears as **entry #24**.

Shulgin designated 2C-E as one of the **"magical half-dozen"** — his six most significant phenethylamine psychedelics — alongside mescaline, DOM, 2C-B, 2C-T-2, and 2C-T-7. Of the six, all except mescaline were developed by Shulgin himself.

In PIHKAL, Shulgin wrote: *"Here is another of the magical half-dozen… let it rest as being a difficult and worth-while material. A very much worth-while material."* He noted the typical oral dose as 10–25 mg and duration as 8–12 hours, and specifically flagged a **steep dose-response curve** — a small dose increase can produce a substantially stronger experience.

The synthesis route documented in PIHKAL begins with Friedel-Crafts acylation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene, followed by Clemmensen reduction, Vilsmeier formylation, Henry reaction (nitrostyrene formation), and lithium aluminium hydride reduction to yield the amine hydrochloride.

### Research Chemical Market Emergence

2C-E entered the research chemical market in the early-to-mid 2000s, approximately contemporaneously with 2C-B and 2C-I. The compound was sold online as a legal research chemical in many jurisdictions prior to national/international scheduling.

### Key Incidents and Regulatory Timeline

- **March 2011, Blaine, Minnesota, USA**: One person (Trevor Robinson-Davis, 19 years old) died of cardiac arrest and ten others were hospitalised following mass insufflation of 2C-E at a private party. The drug was purchased online and was legal at the time of the incident; it had been mislabelled as 2C-I [Ref 27]. This incident was a significant driver of US scheduling.

- **July 9, 2012**: US President signed the **Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 (SDAPA)**, placing 2C-E and 25 other substances in Schedule I. DEA established formal drug codes January 4, 2013 [Ref 23].

- **2019** (European case): A documented mass poisoning event in Europe involved middle-aged individuals who consumed a combination of 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly (BDF). Full case described in Iwersen-Bergmann et al. (2019) [Ref 2].

---

## Subjective Effects

Based on Papaseit et al. (2020) [Ref 1], the first controlled observational study of 2C-E in humans (n=10, oral doses 6.5–25 mg):

- **Primary effects:** Alterations in perception, hallucinations, and euphoric mood
- **Cardiovascular:** Increased blood pressure and heart rate
- **Rating scales (VAS, ARCI, VESSPA-SSE):** Showed psychedelic-like effects comparable to 2C-B and other serotonin-acting drugs at doses of 6.5–25 mg
- **Onset:** Effects were measurable at 2 hours (saliva Tmax)
- **Duration measured:** Effects assessed across 6 h in this study (total duration likely longer)

Shulgin's PIHKAL description [Ref 16] characterises 2C-E as producing:
- Open and closed-eye visuals
- Time distortion
- Enhanced introspection
- Ego dissolution at higher doses
- Strong euphoria in some individuals; significant body load discomfort in others
- Effects distinctly "difficult" and heavily dose-dependent

**Comparison to 2C-B:** Both compounds show similar subjective effect profiles via shared 5-HT₂A/2B/2C agonism; 2C-B (Papaseit et al. 2018 [Ref 13]) at 10–20 mg oral showed increased BP/HR, euphoria, and perceptual changes with saliva Tmax ~1 h. 2C-E at comparable doses showed similar trajectories but is characterised by users and Shulgin as more intense and more cognitively demanding.

**Effect taxonomy from DB** (not independently verified in published literature; note gaps):
- Perception effects (visual drifting, tracers, after-images, colour enhancement, internal hallucinations, synesthesia, etc.) are consistent with 5-HT₂A agonism mechanism.
- Cognitive effects (thought connectivity, creativity enhancement, pattern recognition, conceptual thinking) are consistent with the psychedelic class.
- Body effects (stimulation, nausea, bruxism, pupil dilation, increased urination, muscle tension, temperature dysregulation, abnormal heartbeat) are consistent with sympathomimetic and serotonergic effects documented in Papaseit 2020 [Ref 1] and Dean et al. 2013 [Ref 6].
- **Seizure threshold reduction** is noted in the DB and consistent with clinical toxicology literature (Dean 2013 [Ref 6]).

**⚠️ FLAG:** The specific effect taxonomies (e.g., "Visual scenery slicing," "Symmetrical texture repetition") in the DB are derived from user reports and psychedelic community consensus, not published controlled studies. They should be presented as user-reported phenomenology, not clinically validated findings.

---

## Safety & Toxicity

### LD50

**No published LD50 data exists for 2C-E in any species.** The toxic dose in humans is unknown (consistent with the seed data). This is a significant safety gap.

**⚠️ FLAG (safety-critical):** The absence of published LD50 data means the therapeutic index for 2C-E cannot be calculated. The generation agent must state this absence explicitly and not extrapolate from structural analogues.

### Human Fatalities

**One confirmed fatality** is documented in published literature and harm reduction databases (Erowid [Ref 14]):
- **Trevor Robinson-Davis** (male, age 19), Blaine, Minnesota, USA, **March 2011**
- Cause: **cardiac arrest** following insufflation of a large dose of 2C-E at a private party
- Autopsy: death attributed to cardiac arrest with drugs in the 2C category present; no pre-existing natural disease identified
- Context: drug was purchased online, was legal at the time, and was mislabelled as 2C-I [Ref 27]

**Mass poisoning events:**
1. **Blaine, MN, USA (2011):** 1 fatality + 10 hospitalised (2 in critical condition). Survivors reported delirium, hallucinations, paranoia, auditory distortions, overheating [Refs 14, 27].
2. **European case (2019):** A mass poisoning involving middle-aged individuals who consumed both 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly (Iwersen-Bergmann et al. 2019 [Ref 2]). This case was unusual due to the age profile of the consumers and the combination of two NPS.

### Clinical Toxidrome

Based on Dean et al. (2013) [Ref 6] (the principal 2C toxicology review, 205 citations):

**Common features in 2C-drug intoxication:**
- Hallucinations, agitation, aggression, violence, dysphoria
- Hypertension, tachycardia
- Seizures
- Hyperthermia
- **Excited delirium** — most consistent presentation among reported deaths from 2C drugs (at least 5 deaths attributed to 2C drugs in literature at time of that review)

**Sympathomimetic toxidrome vs. serotonin toxicity:** Presentations can resemble either, reflecting 2C-E's dual mechanism (5-HT₂A agonism + mild NE/5-HT reuptake inhibition). Excited delirium with hyperthermia was the consistent feature in 2C-related deaths.

**Secondary complications:** Rhabdomyolysis, cardiovascular collapse, metabolic acidosis may occur in severe cases (consistent with excited delirium presentations; Zawilska et al. 2020 [Ref 21] for NBOMe comparators, applicable by mechanism).

### Acute Physiological Effects (Controlled Setting)

Papaseit et al. (2020) [Ref 1] documented in 10 users (6.5–25 mg oral):
- Elevated blood pressure
- Elevated heart rate
- No serious adverse events reported at these doses in this small sample

---

## Harm Reduction

### Risk Mitigation

1. **Dose caution:** 2C-E has a notoriously **steep dose-response curve** (Shulgin [Ref 16]). Shulgin specifically warned that a small dose increase (e.g., 10 mg → 30 mg) can produce a dramatically more intense experience, including very frightening outcomes at the upper end.
2. **Route of administration:** The 2011 fatality occurred via insufflation, which yields faster onset and potentially higher peak concentrations compared to oral dosing. The brief identifies insufflation as the primary ROA in the DB — this is a significant risk flag. Insufflated pharmacokinetics for 2C-E have not been formally studied.
3. **Reagent testing:** 2C-E responds to Marquis reagent (produces black/dark colour), Mecke, and Simon's reagent. This can help distinguish from adulterants or substitutions (e.g., the MN incident involved mislabelled 2C-I).
4. **Setting and support:** Prolonged duration (8–12 hrs per Shulgin; 6–10 hrs per community consensus) requires adequate preparation.
5. **Hyperthermia management:** Active cooling is critical in overdose presentations; hyperthermia is a primary driver of morbidity.

### Emergency Protocol

Based on Dean et al. (2013) [Ref 6]:
- **Treatment is primarily supportive**
- **Benzodiazepines** for agitation and seizure control (first-line)
- Immediate action required for excited delirium, hyperthermia, and seizures
- Active cooling for hyperthermia
- No specific antidote

### Contraindications

Published contraindications specific to 2C-E are not established in the primary literature. By class mechanism:
- MAO inhibitors (MAOIs): likely dangerous — additive serotonergic effects; risk of serotonin syndrome
- Lithium: conflicting reports in psychedelic class; some suggest seizure risk
- Tramadol: **classified as dangerous** in DB — mechanistically supported (see Interactions section)

---

## Tolerance & Dependence

### Tolerance

2C-E produces rapid tolerance consistent with the psychedelic class. The mechanism involves **5-HT₂A receptor downregulation** in frontal cortex following repeated activation, as demonstrated for psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists by de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) [Ref 20]. Tolerance typically develops within 1–4 days of repeated use and subsides within several days.

### Cross-Tolerance

**Cross-tolerance with other classical psychedelics** (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, other 2C-compounds) is established for the class (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022 [Ref 20]). This cross-tolerance is specific to psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists and does **not** extend to non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists such as lisuride [Ref 20].

The seed data lists "psychedelic" as the cross-tolerance class — consistent with literature.

### Dependence

2C-E is **not considered habit-forming** (consistent with the seed data). No published case reports of physiological dependence or withdrawal syndrome exist for 2C-E or the 2C class. This is consistent with the known pharmacology of the 5-HT₂A receptor — repeated activation leads to rapid receptor downregulation (tolerance), which reduces the reinforcing effects.

---

## Interactions

### Tramadol: **Dangerous**

The "dangerous" classification in the seed data is **pharmacologically supported**:
- 2C-E activates 5-HT₂A/2B/2C receptors and inhibits SERT/NET (Papaseit 2020 [Ref 1])
- Tramadol inhibits SERT (human SERT-transfected HEK293 cells confirmed; Baldo 2018 [Ref 22]) and is associated with serotonin syndrome, particularly when combined with other serotonergic agents (Park et al. 2014 [Ref 29]; Baldo 2018 [Ref 22])
- The combination of a 5-HT₂A agonist (2C-E) with a SERT inhibitor (tramadol) would substantially increase synaptic serotonin activity — a recognised mechanism for serotonin syndrome
- ⚠️ **FLAG (safety-critical):** No case report specifically documenting 2C-E + tramadol serotonin syndrome has been found in the published literature. The "dangerous" classification is based on pharmacological mechanism (class-level evidence), not substance-specific clinical reports. This should be stated explicitly.

### Cannabis: **Unknown**

No published data on 2C-E + cannabis interactions. The "unknown" classification in the DB is appropriate. By class: cannabis (via CB₁ agonism) may potentiate psychedelic effects or increase psychological distress in some individuals, but substance-specific data for 2C-E is absent.

### Other Interactions (Class-Level Evidence, Not 2C-E-Specific)

- **MAO inhibitors:** Likely dangerous — the combination of serotonin reuptake inhibition and 5-HT₂A agonism with MAOI-mediated serotonin accumulation would substantially increase serotonin syndrome risk.
- **SSRIs/SNRIs:** May reduce psychedelic effects via 5-HT₂A downregulation from chronic SSRI use; simultaneous acute use could increase serotonin toxicity risk.
- **Lithium:** Some reports of seizures when combined with psychedelics; mechanism unclear.
- **Stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine):** Additive cardiovascular strain.
- **Bromo-DragonFly:** Documented mass poisoning when combined with 2C-E (Iwersen-Bergmann 2019 [Ref 2]); specific mechanism not characterised.

⚠️ **FLAG:** The interaction list in the DB contains only tramadol and cannabis. The generation agent may wish to flag additional high-risk interactions (MAOIs in particular) for editorial review, given established class-level pharmacology.

---

## Legal Status

| Jurisdiction | Status | Date | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Schedule I | July 9, 2012 | Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act (SDAPA) [Ref 23] |
| United Kingdom | Class A | 2002 | Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 amendment (phenethylamine catch-all) [Ref 15] |
| Sweden | Controlled | October 1, 2004 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| Denmark | Schedule I | April 8, 2007 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| Israel | Controlled | December 2007 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| China | Category I psychotropic | September 2010 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| Japan | Designated substance | Unknown date | Designated substances law [Ref 15] |
| New Zealand | Schedule 3 / Class C | Ongoing | Analogues provision [Ref 15] |
| Brazil | Controlled | February 18, 2014 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| Germany | Anlage I BtMG | December 13, 2014 | Narcotics Act (BtMG) [Ref 15] |
| Finland | Banned | December 19, 2014 | National scheduling [Ref 15] |
| Canada | Schedule III (unconfirmed) | ~October 2016 | Erowid notes as unconfirmed [Ref 15] |
| Australia | Likely Schedule 9 | Not confirmed | Analogy with other 2C compounds; not independently verified |

⚠️ **FLAG:** Australia and Canada status requires independent verification from official government sources. Erowid specifically marks Canada's Schedule III status as "unconfirmed." Australia was not listed in the Erowid legal database retrieved, though by analogy with the 2C-drug class is likely Schedule 9 (prohibited substance).

**Federal Analog Act (USA):** Prior to 2012 SDAPA scheduling, 2C-E may have been subject to prosecution under the Federal Analog Act as a structural analogue of a controlled substance. The 2011 Blaine, MN arrest was made under this provision [Ref 27].

---

## Clinical Trials

**No registered clinical trials for 2C-E were identified** in ClinicalTrials.gov search. The nearest registered trial is NCT05523401 ("Acute Effects of 2C-B Compared with MDMA and Psilocybin in Healthy Subjects," completed, Phase 1, University Hospital Basel), which involves a different compound.

2C-E has not entered clinical trial programmes. Its Schedule I status in the US and Class A status in the UK creates significant regulatory barriers to human research.

---

## Community Feedback Analysis

**No community feedback submitted.** (Part A2 of the brief was empty.)

---

## Gaps & Flags

### Critical Safety Gaps (flag for editorial review before publication)

1. **⚠️ No published LD50 data for 2C-E in any species.** Toxic dose in humans is unknown. This must be stated explicitly in the article; no extrapolation from structural analogues should be made.

2. **⚠️ Tramadol interaction classified as "dangerous" — pharmacologically supported but not confirmed by a published 2C-E + tramadol case report.** The mechanism is credible (SERT inhibition + 5-HT₂A agonism → serotonin syndrome risk), but absence of substance-specific clinical evidence should be disclosed.

3. **⚠️ Insufflated pharmacokinetics are entirely unstudied.** The DB lists insufflation as the primary ROA; the only human PK data (Papaseit 2020) is oral. All insufflated dose/duration data in the DB is derived from user reports. This gap is significant because the confirmed US fatality occurred via insufflation.

4. **⚠️ SMILES string missing from PubChem API response.** The generation agent should retrieve canonical SMILES from PubChem CID 24729233 directly before publishing.

### Data Quality Flags

5. **Ki/EC₅₀ values not extractable from abstracts.** Binding affinity data is published in tables of Eshleman et al. 2014 [Ref 3], Rickli et al. 2015 [Ref 4], and Ray 2010 [Ref 5]. The generation agent should access full papers for specific numerical values.

6. **Duration discrepancy between sources:**
   - Seed data (DB): 6–10 hours total (oral)
   - Shulgin PIHKAL [Ref 16]: 8–12 hours
   - These ranges overlap but are not identical. Shulgin's data is based on small personal bioassay (not formal studies). The DB range appears to reflect the more conservative community consensus.

7. **Dose discrepancy (Shulgin vs. seed data):**
   - Shulgin PIHKAL [Ref 16]: dose range 10–25 mg oral; Shulgin personal dose notes begin at 10 mg
   - Seed data: Common dose listed as 10–15 mg; Heavy listed as 30+ mg
   - Papaseit 2020 [Ref 1]: Used doses of 6.5–25 mg; 6.5 mg produced measurable effects
   - The seed data's threshold of 2 mg and light range of 5–10 mg are **lower** than Shulgin's minimum of 10 mg. This may reflect unusually sensitive individuals or different formulation purity. No published dose-finding study exists to adjudicate. The generation agent should propose dose data conservatively and flag this discrepancy for editorial review.

8. **Insufflated dose ranges in seed data** (threshold 1 mg, light 1–4 mg, common 4–7 mg, strong 7–14 mg, heavy 14+) are **entirely community-consensus-derived** with no published pharmacokinetic support. The 2011 fatality occurred via insufflation, which complicates these lower dose thresholds. Treat as community-consensus data only.

9. **Street name:** Seed data lists "Eternity." PsychonautWiki also lists "Aquarust" as a street name. Neither appears in published literature. Include as community-reported only.

10. **CAS number 71539-34-9** is widely cited in the literature and databases but was not confirmed via API. Flag for editorial verification.

11. **Australia legal status not confirmed.** Web search and Erowid database did not explicitly confirm Australia Schedule 9 status for 2C-E. Generation agent should not state this as confirmed.

12. **Canada legal status contested.** Erowid notes Schedule III but marks it "unconfirmed." Earlier Erowid data suggests it may have been unscheduled. Generation agent should state as uncertain pending official source verification.

### Structural Analogy Reliance

13. **MAO inhibitor interaction**, while mechanistically obvious, is listed here by class-level inference, not 2C-E-specific evidence.
14. **Seizure threshold reduction** is listed in the DB effects taxonomy and supported by the Dean 2013 review for the 2C class, but no 2C-E-specific seizure mechanistic study exists.
15. **Dependence/withdrawal:** Absence of published reports is consistent with the pharmacological class; this is class-level inference, not 2C-E-specific data.