TMA-6
2,4,6-trimethoxyamphetamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | medium |
| Low | 10–20 mg | 10–20 mg | medium |
| Common | 20–35 mg | 20–35 mg | medium |
| Strong | 35–50 mg | 35–50 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 50+ mg | 50+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Shulgin's PiHKAL entry #162 reports the active dose range as 25-50 mg oral. The threshold (5 mg) and light range (10-20 mg) are community-derived from PsychonautWiki and are not confirmed by primary literature. The common (20-35 mg) and strong (35-50 mg) ranges align with Shulgin's documented range. Heavy (50+ mg) exceeds all documented use. Existing database values carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin's PiHKAL entry #162 reports the active dose range as 25-50 mg oral. The threshold (5 mg) and light range (10-20 mg) are community-derived from PsychonautWiki and are not confirmed by primary literature. The common (20-35 mg) and strong (35-50 mg) ranges align with Shulgin's documented range. Heavy (50+ mg) exceeds all documented use. Existing database values carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 30–90 minutes | 30–90 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Onset of 30-90 minutes reported by PsychonautWiki, consistent with oral amphetamine absorption kinetics. Not from controlled PK study. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset of 30-90 minutes reported by PsychonautWiki, consistent with oral amphetamine absorption kinetics. Not from controlled PK study. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Come-up duration inferred from total duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profile. No substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCome-up duration inferred from total duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profile. No substance-specific data. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 3–4.5 hours | 3–4.5 hours | low |
| Editorial | Peak duration estimated from total subjective duration of 12-16 hours (PiHKAL). No controlled data on phase-specific timing for TMA-6. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPeak duration estimated from total subjective duration of 12-16 hours (PiHKAL). No controlled data on phase-specific timing for TMA-6. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Offsettrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Offset duration inferred from total duration envelope (12-16 hours from PiHKAL) minus onset, come-up, and peak estimates. No substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOffset duration inferred from total duration envelope (12-16 hours from PiHKAL) minus onset, come-up, and peak estimates. No substance-specific data. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Totaltrace | 12–16 hours | 12–16 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Total subjective duration of 12-16 hours from Shulgin's PiHKAL entry #162, corroborated by PsychonautWiki community data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal subjective duration of 12-16 hours from Shulgin's PiHKAL entry #162, corroborated by PsychonautWiki community data. Evidence basis: expert_opinion | |||
| After effectstrace | 6–18 hours | 6–18 hours | low |
| Editorial | Aftereffects duration of 6-18 hours from PsychonautWiki community reports. Not documented in primary Shulgin literature. Wide range reflects variability across community reports and potential influence of MAO-A inhibition on residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAftereffects duration of 6-18 hours from PsychonautWiki community reports. Not documented in primary Shulgin literature. Wide range reflects variability across community reports and potential influence of MAO-A inhibition on residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | low | low | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular | cardiovascular | low |
| Editorial | Classified as low (downgraded from moderate): no substance-specific toxicity data exist. Cardiovascular and serotonergic risks inferred from amphetamine backbone + 5-HT2A agonist + MAO-A inhibitor pharmacological profile. Class-level evidence from mescaline analogs (Hardman et al. 1973) may include TMA-6 but is unconfirmed. The absence of any case reports or overdose data limits assessment confidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClassified as low (downgraded from moderate): no substance-specific toxicity data exist. Cardiovascular and serotonergic risks inferred from amphetamine backbone + 5-HT2A agonist + MAO-A inhibitor pharmacological profile. Class-level evidence from mescaline analogs (Hardman et al. 1973) may include TMA-6 but is unconfirmed. The absence of any case reports or overdose data limits assessment confidence. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | No TMA-6-specific dependence studies exist. Assessment based on well-established class profile of classical 5-HT2A psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline), which uniformly lack reinforcing properties and dependence liability. TMA-6's confirmed absence of monoamine transporter activity supports this classification. Confidence medium rather than high because no substance-specific data confirm the class inference. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo TMA-6-specific dependence studies exist. Assessment based on well-established class profile of classical 5-HT2A psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline), which uniformly lack reinforcing properties and dependence liability. TMA-6's confirmed absence of monoamine transporter activity supports this classification. Confidence medium rather than high because no substance-specific data confirm the class inference. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome documented or expected for classical 5-HT2A psychedelics. TMA-6 does not produce physical dependence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome documented or expected for classical 5-HT2A psychedelics. TMA-6 does not produce physical dependence. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | medium |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DOM, DOB, DOI, 2C-B, TMA-2 | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DOM, DOB, DOI, 2C-B, TMA-2 | medium |
| Editorial | Tolerance profile inferred from classical 5-HT2A psychedelic class (Nichols 2018). Specific values (3-day half-life, 7-day reset) from community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No substance-specific tolerance data exist for TMA-6. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance profile inferred from classical 5-HT2A psychedelic class (Nichols 2018). Specific values (3-day half-life, 7-day reset) from community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No substance-specific tolerance data exist for TMA-6. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for all 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics, well-established in clinical and community literature. No TMA-6-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for all 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics, well-established in clinical and community literature. No TMA-6-specific data. | |||
| psychiatric bipolar disordertrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No TMA-6-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. No TMA-6-specific data. | |||
| cardiovascular uncontrolled hypertensiontrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from amphetamine backbone pharmacology and 5-HT2A-mediated vasoconstriction. No TMA-6-specific cardiovascular data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from amphetamine backbone pharmacology and 5-HT2A-mediated vasoconstriction. No TMA-6-specific cardiovascular data. | |||
| other concurrent MAO inhibitor usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Pharmacological inference from TMA-6's reported MAO-A inhibitory activity combined with established serotonin syndrome pathophysiology. No substance-specific interaction data, but the mechanism is well-characterized. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPharmacological inference from TMA-6's reported MAO-A inhibitory activity combined with established serotonin syndrome pathophysiology. No substance-specific interaction data, but the mechanism is well-characterized. | |||
| other concurrent SSRI/SNRI usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Well-established pharmacological interaction between MAO inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors. TMA-6's reported MAO-A IC50 of ~400 nM indicates clinically relevant inhibition at active doses. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWell-established pharmacological interaction between MAO inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors. TMA-6's reported MAO-A IC50 of ~400 nM indicates clinically relevant inhibition at active doses. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | Standard contraindication for unstudied psychoactive compounds with serotonergic and sympathomimetic activity. No TMA-6-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningStandard contraindication for unstudied psychoactive compounds with serotonergic and sympathomimetic activity. No TMA-6-specific data. | |||
| hepatic hepatic impairmenttrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Structural class inference — methoxylated amphetamines are expected to undergo hepatic CYP-mediated metabolism. No TMA-6-specific metabolic data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningStructural class inference — methoxylated amphetamines are expected to undergo hepatic CYP-mediated metabolism. No TMA-6-specific metabolic data. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
| Come uptrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.30) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.30) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
| Peaktrace | 10800–16200 sec(i=1.00) | 10800–16200 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
| Plateautrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.55) | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.55) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.20) | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 21600–64800 sec(i=0.05) | 21600–64800 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases inferred from PiHKAL total duration (12-16 hours), PsychonautWiki onset (30-90 minutes) and aftereffects (6-18 hours), and class pharmacology of long-acting phenethylamine psychedelics. No controlled pharmacokinetic or phase-specific timing data exist for TMA-6. Phase boundaries are estimates based on the overall duration envelope and typical phenethylamine psychedelic temporal profiles. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (~5 mg oral), effects are subtle and easily mistaken for placebo: mild mood elevation, slight brightening of colors, and a gentle sense of heightened awareness. Some users report faint body tingling or a barely perceptible shift in thought pattern. These effects are at the edge of perceptibility and may not be noticed in distracting environments. Physically, mild pupil dilation may be the only observable sign. No significant stimulation or body load is expected at this range. The threshold dose is not confirmed by primary literature — Shulgin's PiHKAL entry begins at 25 mg — and derives from community self-reports.
Threshold of 5 mg derives from community sources (PsychonautWiki) and is not confirmed by Shulgin's primary literature, which reports the active range as 25-50 mg. Community-derived value carried forward with low confidence.
ReasoningReasoning
Threshold of 5 mg derives from community sources (PsychonautWiki) and is not confirmed by Shulgin's primary literature, which reports the active range as 25-50 mg. Community-derived value carried forward with low confidence.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At light doses (10–20 mg oral), a recognizable psychedelic shift begins to emerge. Color enhancement becomes noticeable, with surfaces appearing more vivid and saturated. Mild thought connectivity produces novel associations, and emotional sensitivity increases. A gentle stimulation — consistent with the amphetamine backbone — manifests as mental alertness and physical energy. Body effects include mild pupil dilation, slight increase in heart rate, and faint body tingling. The experience is manageable and functional for most users, though cognitive focus may be intermittently disrupted. Duration at this range is expected to be 8–12 hours, shorter than at full doses but still requiring a clear schedule.
Light dose range of 10-20 mg is community-derived (PsychonautWiki) and falls below Shulgin's reported active range of 25-50 mg. Not confirmed by primary literature. Experiential description inferred from class pharmacology of phenethylamine psychedelics at sub-active doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Light dose range of 10-20 mg is community-derived (PsychonautWiki) and falls below Shulgin's reported active range of 25-50 mg. Not confirmed by primary literature. Experiential description inferred from class pharmacology of phenethylamine psychedelics at sub-active doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At common doses (20–35 mg oral), the full psychedelic experience develops. Visual effects become pronounced: color alteration intensifies, surfaces exhibit visual drifting and morphing, and tracers follow moving objects. Closed-eye visuals feature geometric patterning. Thought connectivity increases substantially, producing insight and associative thinking. Emotional enhancement and empathy enhancement are reported, alongside a stimulating body state described by Shulgin as producing "great humor" and steady physical control. Physically, stimulation is prominent — consistent with the amphetamine backbone. Peripheral vasoconstriction may produce cool extremities. Heart rate and blood pressure elevation are expected. Appetite suppression is typical. The full 12–16 hour duration applies at this range. Sleep is not possible for the majority of the experience. Plan for no obligations for the entire day.
Common dose range (20-35 mg) overlaps with Shulgin's PiHKAL active range of 25-50 mg. Subjective effect descriptions drawn from PiHKAL reports and consistent with 5-HT2A agonist phenomenology. Duration of 12-16 hours from PiHKAL.
ReasoningReasoning
Common dose range (20-35 mg) overlaps with Shulgin's PiHKAL active range of 25-50 mg. Subjective effect descriptions drawn from PiHKAL reports and consistent with 5-HT2A agonist phenomenology. Duration of 12-16 hours from PiHKAL.
Evidence basis: expert_opinion
At strong doses (35–50 mg oral), TMA-6 produces an intense, fully immersive psychedelic experience. Visual phenomena become very active — Shulgin described the experience at this range as "very, very active, visual, colorful." Time distortion is significant, and cognitive patterns shift toward deep introspection or expansive associative thinking. Emotional responses intensify markedly, encompassing both euphoric peaks and potential periods of psychological difficulty — one participant reported "a strange mixture of plateaus, exuberance, and strong negative feelings." Physical stimulation is pronounced: tachycardia, hypertension, vasoconstriction, and jaw tension are expected. Wakefulness is sustained throughout the experience. Body load increases relative to common doses. The full 12–16 hour duration is expected. The intensity and length of this experience demand careful preparation, a trusted environment, and no scheduled obligations for 24 hours.
Strong dose range (35-50 mg) corresponds to the upper portion of Shulgin's PiHKAL active range (25-50 mg). Subjective descriptions drawn directly from PiHKAL entry #162 qualitative reports. Physical effects inferred from amphetamine backbone + 5-HT2A agonist pharmacology.
ReasoningReasoning
Strong dose range (35-50 mg) corresponds to the upper portion of Shulgin's PiHKAL active range (25-50 mg). Subjective descriptions drawn directly from PiHKAL entry #162 qualitative reports. Physical effects inferred from amphetamine backbone + 5-HT2A agonist pharmacology.
Evidence basis: expert_opinion
At heavy doses (50+ mg oral), TMA-6 exceeds the upper bound of Shulgin's documented active range. The psychedelic experience at this level is expected to be overwhelming: intense and potentially uncontrollable visual phenomena, profound time distortion, and extreme emotional lability. The risk of psychologically challenging experiences increases substantially. Cognitive coherence may be intermittently lost. Physical effects are expected to be significant: pronounced sympathomimetic cardiovascular stress (tachycardia, hypertension), strong vasoconstriction, and sustained wakefulness. The MAO-A inhibitory activity at these doses may produce unpredictable potentiation of serotonergic effects. No safety data exist for doses above 50 mg. Duration may extend beyond 16 hours. This dose range carries substantially elevated risk and is not documented in the primary literature.
Heavy doses (50+ mg) exceed Shulgin's documented range of 25-50 mg. No primary literature describes effects above 50 mg. Risk assessment inferred from class pharmacology — higher doses of 5-HT2A agonists produce dose-dependent intensification of all effects. MAO-A inhibition adds unpredictability at high doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Heavy doses (50+ mg) exceed Shulgin's documented range of 25-50 mg. No primary literature describes effects above 50 mg. Risk assessment inferred from class pharmacology — higher doses of 5-HT2A agonists produce dose-dependent intensification of all effects. MAO-A inhibition adds unpredictability at high doses.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]weak
- [2]moderateStructure-Activity Relationships of One-Ring PsychotomimeticsShulgin A, Sargent T, Naranjo C · 1969 · Naturedoi.org/10.1038/221537a07 claims checked7 inconclusive
- [3]weak
- [4]strongChemistry and Structure-Activity Relationships of Psychedelics.Nichols DE · 2018 · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- [5]weak2,4,6-Trimethoxyamphetamine hydrochloride - Cayman Chemical/Bertin BioreagentCayman Chemical · 2024linkno claims checked
- [6]moderateLC-MS analysis of trimethoxyamphetamine designer drugs (TMA series) from urine samplesNieddu M, Boatto G, Pirisi MA, Azara E, Marchetti M · 2008 · Journal of Chromatography B
- [7]moderateLC-MS/MS screening method for designer amphetamines, tryptamines, and piperazines in serumWohlfarth A, Weinmann W, Dresen S · 2010 · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- [8]moderateFunctional selectivity of hallucinogenic phenethylamine and phenylisopropylamine derivatives at human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C receptorsMoya PR, Berg KA, Gutierrez-Hernandez MA, Saez-Briones P, Reyes-Parada M, Cassels BK, Clarke WP · 2007 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 173376332 claims checked1 verified1 partial
- [9]weak
- [10]moderateMonoamine oxidase inhibitory properties of some methoxylated and alkylthio amphetamine derivatives: structure-activity relationshipsScorza MC, Carrau C, Silveira R, Zapata-Torres G, Cassels BK, Reyes-Parada M · 1997 · Biochemical Pharmacologypubmed 93936792 claims checked2 verified
- [11]moderateComparison of AM1 and B3LYP-DFT for inhibition of MAO-A by phenylisopropylamines: a QSAR studyDeeb O, Clare BW · 2008 · Chemical Biology and Drug Design
- [12]weak
- [13]moderateReceptor Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkoxy-Substituted 2,5-Dimethoxyphenethylamines and Related Amphetamines.Kolaczynska KE, Luethi D, Trachsel D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2019 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [14]moderateReceptor Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkoxy-3,5-Dimethoxy-Phenethylamines (Mescaline Derivatives) and Related AmphetaminesKolaczynska KE, Luethi D, Trachsel D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2021 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [15]moderateSulfur-substituted alpha-alkyl phenethylamines as selective and reversible MAO-A inhibitors: biological activities, CoMFA analysis, and active site modelingGallardo-Godoy A, Fierro A, McLean TH, Castillo M, Cassels BK, Reyes-Parada M, Nichols DE · 2005 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 158018321 claim checked1 verified
- [16]moderateRelationship of the structure of mescaline and seven analogs to toxicity and behavior in five species of laboratory animalsHardman HF, Haavik CO, Seevers MH · 1973 · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacologypubmed 41976352 claims checked2 verified
- [17]moderateDihydrobenzofuran analogues of hallucinogens. 4. Mescaline derivativesMonte AP, Waldman SR, Marona-Lewicka D, Wainscott DB, Nelson DL, Sanders-Bush E, Nichols DE · 1997 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 93016611 claim checked1 verified
- [18]moderateComparison of the behavioral effects of mescaline analogs using the head twitch response in miceHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Chapman SJ, Brandt SD · 2019 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
- [19]moderateComparison of the behavioral responses induced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens and their tetrahydrobenzodifuran ("FLY") and benzodifuran ("DragonFLY") analogsHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Stratford A, Grill M, Brandt SD · 2019 · Neuropharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary2 claims2inconclusive
inconclusiveFirst synthesized in the early 1950s and independently characterized as psychoactive by Alexander Shulgin in 1964, TMA-6 was documented as entry #162 in PiHKAL (1991) and studied in the landmark 1969 Nature paper establishing structure-activity relationships across TMA positional isomers[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify any aspect of the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveTolerance develops rapidly through 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation, consistent with the classical psychedelic class; no dependence liability has been identified[4]model confidence 90%
The abstract describes a SAR review focused on structure-activity relationships and 5-HT2A as the principal target. It says nothing about tolerance, receptor downregulation, or dependence liability — these mechanistic/clinical details are not addressed in the abstract.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
history4 claims2verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveThe paper positioned TMA-6 among the more potent trimethoxyamphetamine isomers, though TMA-2 (2,4,5-isomer) was identified as the most potent in human subjects.[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedA broader LC-MS/MS screening method for designer amphetamines in serum, developed by Wohlfarth et al., also includes TMA-6 among its target analytes[7]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms a validated LC-MS/MS screening method covering 35 designer drugs including TMA-6 in serum.
Validated LC-MS/MS screening method covering 35 designer drugs including TMA-6 and 3,4,5-TMA. LOD 1.0-5.0 ng/mL in serum.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedIts detection in forensic samples prompted development of a specific LC-MS assay by Nieddu et al. for simultaneous identification of TMA, TMA-2, and TMA-6 in urine[6]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms a validated LC-MS method for simultaneous quantification of TMA, TMA-2, and TMA-6 in human urine.
Validated LC-MS method for simultaneous quantification of TMA, TMA-2, and TMA-6 in human urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveWorking with Thornton Sargent and Claudio Naranjo, Shulgin conducted systematic human dose-response studies across multiple TMA positional isomers, culminating in the 1969 Nature paper Structure-Activity Relationships of One-Ring Psychotomimetics[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
chemistry2 claims1verified1inconclusive
verifiedMoya et al. demonstrated that phenylisopropylamines are more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT2A receptors, establishing the functional significance of this structural feature across the broader class.[8]model confidence 99%
The abstract explicitly states 'Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A,' directly confirming the claim.
Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A. Functional selectivity demonstrated.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveWithin the phenylisopropylamine psychedelic class, the (R)-enantiomer is generally the more pharmacologically active stereoisomer at 5-HT2A receptors[4]model confidence 85%
The SAR review abstract mentions 'key structural features for each class' but does not specifically address stereochemistry or (R)-enantiomer activity. This detail may be covered in the full text but cannot be confirmed from the abstract.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacology5 claims5verified
verifiedTMA-6 is a potent, full agonist at the serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor, the primary molecular target mediating classical psychedelic effects[4]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms 5-HT2A is the principal target for this class of serotonergic hallucinogens. While TMA-6 is not specifically named and 'full agonist' is not explicitly stated, the review's scope covers phenethylamine/phenylisopropylamine psychedelics and establishes 5-HT2A as the primary target — sufficient to support the core mechanistic claim.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe specific primary publication containing this TMA-6 data was not located in PubMed or OpenAlex during literature review; the Kolaczynska et al. studies from the same group (2019, 2021) characterized related mescaline derivatives and TMA-2 but did not directly report TMA-6 binding data[13]model confidence 90%
The abstract describes receptor binding data for 2C-O and DO-alkoxy derivatives with TMA-2 as a reference compound. No TMA-6 binding data appears in the abstract, supporting the claim that this paper characterizes related compounds and TMA-2 but not TMA-6 directly.
TMA-2 included as reference compound (5-HT2A Ki=1300 nM, EC50=190 nM, Emax=84%).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe specific primary publication containing this TMA-6 data was not located in PubMed or OpenAlex during literature review; the Kolaczynska et al. studies from the same group (2019, 2021) characterized related mescaline derivatives and TMA-2 but did not directly report TMA-6 binding data[14]model confidence 95%
The abstract explicitly states 'TMA-6 mentioned in historical context as 2,4,6-substituted compound' — confirming TMA-6 appears only as a historical reference, with no direct binding data reported.
TMA-6 mentioned in historical context as 2,4,6-substituted compound. No potent affinity at non-serotonergic targets.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe MAO-A inhibitory activity is consistent with the broader pharmacology of methoxylated amphetamine derivatives: Scorza et al. demonstrated that submicromolar MAO-A IC50 values are achievable in this chemical class, with para-position electron-donating groups increasing inhibitory potency and steric bulk adjacent to the para-substituent attenuating activity[10]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms submicromolar IC50 for MAO-A and that para-position electron donors increase MAO-A inhibitory activity. The steric bulk claim is not in the abstract but is not contradicted; it is likely addressed in the full paper's SAR analysis.
Several compounds showed submicromolar IC50 for MAO-A. Structure-activity analysis shows para-position electron donors increase MAO-A inhibitory activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedComputational QSAR modeling by Deeb and Clare further contextualized MAO-A inhibition across phenylisopropylamines as a class.[11]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly describes a QSAR study of MAO-A inhibition by phenylisopropylamines, exactly matching the claim.
QSAR study of MAO-A inhibition by phenylisopropylamines. Electron-rich ring systems and HOMO levels increase MAO-A inhibitory activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
receptor pharmacology3 claims2verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe Emax exceeding 100% indicates superagonism relative to the endogenous ligand at this receptor, consistent with the Nichols framework establishing that full 5-HT2A agonism is a critical requirement for hallucinogenic activity.[4]model confidence 85%
The SAR review abstract confirms 5-HT2A as the principal target but does not specifically address full agonism as a critical requirement, superagonism, or the framework described in the claim. These details may be in the full review text.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedScorza et al. established that para-position electron-donating groups increase activity, while steric bulk adjacent to the para-substituent attenuates it[10]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms that para-position electron donors increase MAO-A inhibitory activity. The steric bulk attenuation claim is not mentioned in the abstract but is not contradicted; it likely appears in the full SAR analysis.
Structure-activity analysis shows para-position electron donors increase MAO-A inhibitory activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedGallardo-Godoy et al. further explored SAR for substituted phenethylamines as MAO-A inhibitors, though their primary focus was sulfur-substituted analogs[15]model confidence 95%
The abstract and title confirm a study of sulfur-substituted alpha-alkyl phenethylamines as selective MAO-A inhibitors with CoMFA/SAR analysis, directly matching the claim.
Phenethylamine derivatives assayed for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition. Submicromolar IC50 for MAO-A selectivity. CoMFA modeling.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
neuroscience1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveAs a 5-HT2A agonist, TMA-6 is expected to activate layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex — the cellular trigger for psychedelic effects established across LSD, psilocybin, and mescaline[4]model confidence 85%
The SAR review abstract confirms 5-HT2A as the principal target for this class but does not address the specific cellular mechanism involving layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex. This claim may be covered in the full review but cannot be verified from the abstract.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
safety3 claims1verified2inconclusive
verifiedHardman, Haavik, and Seevers studied mescaline and seven analogs across five species of laboratory animals in 1973[16]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms toxicity and behavioral data for mescaline and analogs in five species of laboratory animals. The 1973 date and 'seven analogs' specifics are not in the abstract but the core description is confirmed.
Toxicity and behavioral data for mescaline and analogs in five species of laboratory animals.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveTolerance to TMA-6's psychedelic effects develops rapidly, consistent with the established mechanism of 5-HT2A receptor downregulation (internalization and reduced surface expression) observed across all classical serotonergic psychedelics[4]model confidence 90%
The SAR review abstract confirms 5-HT2A as the principal target but does not address tolerance, receptor downregulation, internalization, or reduced surface expression. These specific mechanistic claims cannot be verified from this abstract.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveCross-tolerance extends to other 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics including LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, and the DOx series, mediated by the shared receptor downregulation mechanism.[4]model confidence 90%
The SAR review abstract focuses on structure-activity relationships and receptor identity. Cross-tolerance and receptor downregulation mechanisms are not addressed in the abstract.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for each class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
clinical evidence3 claims1verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveThe entirety of published human pharmacological data derives from Shulgin's self-experimentation and small-group studies conducted in the 1960s-1990s, documented in the 1969 Nature paper and in PiHKAL (1991)[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe animal model data from the 1969 paper (ED50 = 46.0 umol/kg) was generated using behavioral assays of the era[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the specific ED50 value or assay methods.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHardman, Haavik, and Seevers studied mescaline and seven analogs across five species of laboratory animals in 1973, though whether TMA-6 was among the seven analogs tested is not confirmed from the available abstract.[16]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms a study of mescaline and analogs in five species of laboratory animals. The claim accurately represents what the abstract says and correctly hedges about TMA-6's inclusion.
Toxicity and behavioral data for mescaline and analogs in five species of laboratory animals.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
comparative pharmacology7 claims4verified1partial2inconclusive
verifiedKolaczynska et al. measured TMA-2's 5-HT2A profile: Ki = 1,300 +/- 700 nM, EC50 = 190 +/- 90 nM, Emax = 84%.[13]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms Ki=1300 nM, EC50=190 nM, and Emax=84% for TMA-2. The uncertainty values are not in the abstract but the central values match exactly.
TMA-2 included as reference compound (5-HT2A Ki=1300 nM, EC50=190 nM, Emax=84%).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveShulgin identified TMA-2 as the most potent TMA isomer in human subjects, suggesting that in vitro 5-HT2A EC50 alone does not predict human potency — pharmacokinetic differences, metabolic stability, and blood-brain barrier penetration likely contribute.[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialBackbone: Mescaline lacks the alpha-methyl group, making it a phenethylamine rather than a phenylisopropylamine. The alpha-methyl group increases 5-HT2A efficacy, metabolic stability, and oral bioavailability.[8]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms that phenylisopropylamines (alpha-methyl bearing) are more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A, supporting the efficacy claim. However, the specific assertions about increased metabolic stability and oral bioavailability are pharmacokinetic claims not addressed in this abstract, which focuses purely on receptor pharmacology.
Phenylisopropylamines more efficacious than phenethylamines at 5-HT2A. Functional selectivity demonstrated.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe Monte et al. study of dihydrobenzofuran mescaline analogs provides additional SAR context for understanding how trimethoxyphenyl substitution patterns influence 5-HT2A binding and hallucinogenic potency.[17]model confidence 88%
The abstract discusses conformationally restricted mescaline analogs and the role of methoxy group positioning and mobility for receptor activation, directly providing SAR context for trimethoxyphenyl substitution patterns.
Conformationally restricted mescaline analogs show loss of activity; 3 and 5 methoxy groups may need conformational mobility for receptor activation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe Halberstadt et al. head twitch response (HTR) study in mice provides the most systematic behavioral comparison across mescaline analogs[18]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms an HTR study showing that potency relationships closely parallel human hallucinogenic data, validating the assay for investigating 5-HT2A agonist SAR across mescaline analogs.
Potency relationships in HTR closely parallel human hallucinogenic data; provides additional evidence HTR assay for investigating 5-HT2A agonist SAR
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveTMA-6 was not directly tested in that study, but its ED50 of 46.0 umol/kg from the 1969 Shulgin data provides a reference point for future comparative behavioral studies.[2]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available — cannot verify the ED50 value or any aspect of the claim.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe Halberstadt et al. comparison of behavioral responses induced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens and their conformationally restricted analogs further contextualizes the relationship between structural rigidity and behavioral potency within this compound class.[19]model confidence 95%
The abstract confirms comparative behavioral data (HTR in mice) for phenylalkylamine hallucinogens and their conformationally restricted (benzodifuran/FLY) analogs, with restricted analogs showing higher potency — directly supporting the claim about structural rigidity and behavioral potency.
DOB and 2C-B induced HTR in mice; benzodifuran analogs had higher potency. Comparative behavioral data for phenylalkylamine hallucinogen class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 26, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | TMA-6 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleExact match on compound name TMA-6 discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | TMA-6 trimethoxyphenyl amphetamine psychedelic | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo results discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | trimethoxyamphetamine psychedelic phenethylamine Shulgin | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo results discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 4literature search | OpenAlex | TMA-6 2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl amphetamine psychedelic | 1 result, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNot relevant discarded 1: no summary recorded | |||
| 5literature search | PubMed | trimethoxyamphetamine TMA isomers pharmacology serotonin | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCovers mescaline analogs including TMA series in HTR assay | |||
| 6literature search | PubMed | mescaline analog 5-HT2A receptor binding affinity hallucinogen phenethylamine | 3 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleSAR data relevant to trimethoxy substitution pattern similar to TMA-6 | |||
| 7clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | trimethoxyamphetamine psychedelic | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo results discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 8literature search | PubMed | Nichols hallucinogen phenethylamine structure activity relationship 5-HT2A | 9 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComprehensive SAR review directly relevant to TMA-6 class | |||
| 9web search | Web | TMA-6 2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl amphetamine Shulgin PiHKAL pharmacology | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary source for historical and pharmacological data not available in academic literature | |||
| 10document retrieval | Erowid/PiHKAL | — | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary source for synthesis route, dose, duration, and subjective effects | |||
| 11literature search | PubMed | monoamine oxidase inhibitor amphetamine phenethylamine IC50 MAO-A inhibition | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDirectly relevant to TMA-6 MAO-A inhibitory mechanism | |||
| 12literature search | OpenAlex | Shulgin mescaline analog hallucinogen human study 1969 phenylisopropylamine | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHardman 1973 covers mescaline analog toxicity; may include TMA-6. Glennon 2024 provides SAR historical context. | |||
| 13document retrieval | Crossref/DOI | 10.1038/221537a0 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary historical source for TMA-6 pharmacology | |||
| 14document retrieval | ScienceDirect/PubMed | TMA-6 receptor binding 5-HT2A | 1 result, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleTMA-2 data relevant for comparison; TMA-6 not directly studied | |||
| 15web search | Web | TMA-6 5-HT2A EC50 29.2 nM MAO-A IC50 400 nM source | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey pharmacological correction for seed data | |||
| 16database lookup | OpenAlex | Luethi Liechti mescaline 3,4,5-TMA trimethoxyphenethylamine receptor binding | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo direct primary source found for TMA-6 EC50 29.2 nM | |||
| 17legal status search | Web | TMA-6 legal status US UK Germany Sweden Brazil Japan | 1 result, 7 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status data for all major jurisdictions | |||
| 18literature search | OpenAlex | trimethoxyamphetamine TMA series urine analysis LC-MS designer drug | 5 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleForensic detection papers directly relevant to TMA-6 | |||
| 19document retrieval | Frontiers in Pharmacology | TMA-6 receptor binding mescaline derivatives | 1 result, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms TMA-6 is not directly studied in most receptor binding papers from Liechti group | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: TMA-6
---
## Chemical Identity
**Verified from PubChem (CID 31015) [Ref 1 — database lookup]:**
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1-(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine |
| Molecular formula | C₁₂H₁₉NO₃ |
| Molecular weight | 225.28 g/mol |
| InChIKey | DDGNOUVDFKXADP-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| PubChem CID | 31015 |
| CAS (free base) | 15402-79-6 |
| CAS (hydrochloride) | 23815-74-9 |
| SMILES | COc1cc(OC)cc(c1CC(N)C)OC |
**Physical properties:**
- Melting point: 207–208°C (hydrochloride salt) [Ref 17]
- Compound is a racemate; both enantiomers are present in the free base form
**Brief seed data cross-check:**
- Molecular formula (C₁₂H₁₉NO₃), molecular weight (225.28), and IUPAC name all confirmed correct against PubChem.
- SMILES was blank in the brief — now confirmed as: `COc1cc(OC)cc(c1CC(N)C)OC`
- InChIKey was blank in the brief — confirmed as: `DDGNOUVDFKXADP-UHFFFAOYSA-N`
- PubChem CID was blank in the brief — confirmed as: **31015**
---
## Pharmacology
### Primary Mechanism: 5-HT₂A Receptor Agonism
TMA-6 is reported to be a potent, full agonist at the serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor, with an EC₅₀ of 29.2 nM and a maximal efficacy (Emax) of 107% relative to serotonin. It shows no appreciable affinity at the 5-HT₁A receptor (Ki >10,000 nM) or dopamine D₂ receptor (Ki >10,000 nM) [Ref 22 — web-retrieved; see Gaps & Flags for sourcing note].
**⚠️ FLAG — Unverified primary source:** The EC₅₀ of 29.2 nM and Emax of 107% at 5-HT₂A are cited by secondary sources (Wikipedia) and attributed to the Luethi/Liechti group at University Hospital Basel. However, the specific primary publication containing this TMA-6 data was not locatable in PubMed, OpenAlex, or Frontiers in Pharmacology during this research session. The Kolaczynska et al. 2019 [Ref 19] and 2021 [Ref 20] papers from the same group studied related mescaline derivatives and mentioned TMA-6 only in historical context. **This value must be flagged for editorial verification before publication.**
**Comparison with TMA-2 (2,4,5-isomer):** The structurally related TMA-2 has been directly measured at 5-HT₂A: Ki = 1,300 ± 700 nM, EC₅₀ = 190 ± 90 nM, Emax = 84% (Kolaczynska et al. 2019 [Ref 19]). If the reported TMA-6 EC₅₀ of 29.2 nM is accurate, it would indicate substantially higher 5-HT₂A potency than TMA-2 — plausible given that the 2,4,6-substitution pattern is distinct from 2,4,5, and the steric and electronic effects of ortho methoxy groups may enhance receptor interaction.
**Animal model data:** In the landmark Shulgin, Sargent & Naranjo (1969) Nature paper [Ref 12] examining structure-activity relationships across one-ring psychotomimetics, TMA-6 had an ED₅₀ of 46.0 μmol/kg in animal assays, placing it among the more potent trimethoxyamphetamine isomers studied in that series. The paper was the first systematic comparison across TMA positional isomers.
### MAO-A Inhibition
TMA-6 is reported as a potent monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) inhibitor with an IC₅₀ of approximately 400 nM [Ref 22]. This is consistent with the broader finding that methoxylated amphetamine derivatives — including the TMA series — possess MAO-A inhibitory properties [Ref 4 — Scorza et al. 1997; Ref 5 — Deeb & Clare 2008; Ref 16 — Gallardo-Godoy et al. 2005]. The Scorza et al. 1997 paper [Ref 4] established that submicromolar MAO-A IC₅₀ values are achievable with methoxylated amphetamines, with para-position electron-donating groups increasing activity; steric bulk adjacent to the para-substituent attenuates activity.
**⚠️ FLAG — Unverified primary source:** As with the 5-HT₂A EC₅₀, the MAO-A IC₅₀ of 400 nM for TMA-6 specifically is cited by secondary sources (Wikipedia) and the primary study has not been independently confirmed during this research. The Deeb & Clare 2008 QSAR paper [Ref 5] studied phenylisopropylamines as a class, which may include TMA-6. **Requires editorial verification.**
The MAO-A inhibitory activity may contribute to TMA-6's prolonged duration of action (12–16 hours) by reducing serotonin degradation and elevating synaptic 5-HT levels, amplifying 5-HT₂A stimulation.
### ❌ Critical Discrepancy: Not a Monoamine Releasing Agent
**The seed data classifies TMA-6 under "Monoamine releasing agent" — this appears to be incorrect.**
Multiple commercial pharmacological data sources (Cayman Chemical [Ref 18]; Bertin Bioreagent) state explicitly that TMA-6 "has no effect on the release or re-uptake of monoamines (dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine)." In the web-based synthesis of data attributed to the Luethi/Liechti group, TMA-6 is described as "inactive as a monoamine reuptake inhibitor and releasing agent in rat brain synaptosomes (IC₅₀ and EC₅₀ = >100,000 nM, respectively)." This is consistent with TMA-6's structural profile: the three ortho/para methoxy groups and the absence of a 4-position halogeno or alkyl substituent characteristic of the DOM/DOx series mean TMA-6 lacks the structural requirements for potent transporter interaction. Its primary psychedelic mechanism is 5-HT₂A receptor agonism, not monoamine release.
**⚠️ FLAG for editorial correction:** The pharmacological class "Monoamine releasing agent" should be removed from TMA-6's profile. The correct classification is: serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor agonist, MAO-A inhibitor.
### Structure-Activity Context
Within the phenethylamine/amphetamine psychedelic class, the 2,4,6-substitution pattern is unique. The 2,4,5-isomer (TMA-2) was identified by Shulgin as the most potent of the TMA isomers in humans [Ref 12]. The 2,4,6 arrangement places methoxy groups symmetrically at the 2, 4, and 6 positions ("phloroglucinol" pattern), which differs from the asymmetric 3,4,5-arrangement found in mescaline. Nichols' SAR review [Ref 2] provides the pharmacological framework for phenethylamine psychedelics, emphasizing that 5-HT₂A agonism as a full agonist is the critical requirement for hallucinogenic activity — consistent with TMA-6's reported Emax of 107%.
The alpha-methyl group (the amphetamine side chain) significantly increases efficacy relative to the phenethylamine counterpart at 5-HT₂A receptors, as demonstrated by Moya et al. 2007 [Ref 14], who showed phenylisopropylamines are more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts at 5-HT₂A.
The Halberstadt et al. 2019 head twitch response (HTR) study [Ref 1] provides comparative behavioral potency data for the mescaline analog class. HTR potency in mice closely parallels human hallucinogenic potency, making this assay a relevant tool for TMA-6 SAR work (though TMA-6 was not directly tested in that paper).
### Pharmacokinetics
No published human pharmacokinetic data (Cmax, Tmax, Vd, elimination half-life) specific to TMA-6 exists in the published literature reviewed. Inference from structural class:
- Oral bioavailability: expected to be moderate-to-high based on lipophilicity and amphetamine backbone
- Onset: 30–90 minutes (reported in PsychonautWiki [Ref 9]; consistent with oral amphetamine pharmacokinetics)
- The long total duration (10–16 hours) may reflect a combination of: moderate 5-HT₂A receptor residency, MAO-A inhibition slowing serotonin degradation, and slow hepatic clearance
**Metabolism:** No specific metabolic data for TMA-6 has been published. As a substituted amphetamine, CYP2D6 and MAO-A are the most likely primary metabolic enzymes. The three methoxy groups are candidates for O-demethylation via CYP3A4/CYP2D6, producing catechol metabolites. The methoxylated aromatic ring may also undergo aromatic hydroxylation. **No specific CYP enzyme data exists for TMA-6.** The MAO-A inhibitory property of TMA-6 itself may complicate its own metabolism by MAO.
### Stereochemistry
TMA-6 possesses a chiral center at the alpha-carbon. Pharmacologically active phenylisopropylamine psychedelics in the DOx and TMA series are generally more active as the (R)-enantiomer [Ref 2 — Nichols 2018]. No specific enantioselectivity studies have been published for TMA-6. The free base form available commercially is the racemate (CAS 15402-79-6).
---
## History
**Discovery and first synthesis:**
The compound was first synthesized in the early 1950s as part of systematic exploration of mescaline analogs. The earliest documentation of synthesis is from 1954, predating Shulgin's work.
**Shulgin and psychedelic effects (1964):**
Alexander Shulgin independently discovered TMA-6's psychedelic properties in 1964 through self-experimentation. His systematic human pharmacological studies were conducted with Thornton Sargent and Claudio Naranjo, resulting in the landmark 1969 Nature paper "Structure-Activity Relationships of One-Ring Psychotomimetics" [Ref 12]. This paper examined multiple TMA isomers and established the first systematic human dose-response data for this chemical class, reporting TMA-6's ED₅₀ as 46.0 μmol/kg.
**PiHKAL documentation (1991):**
Shulgin documented TMA-6 as entry #162 in PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved, 1991) [Ref 8, Ref 21]. He described TMA-6 as "one of the most rewarding and pleasurable of the methoxylated amphetamines," positioning it alongside TMA-2 as a key compound in the series. He also proposed TMA-6 as a template for generating a "psi-series" of analogues (parallel to the 2C-series off TMA-2). He deliberately described synthesis from phloroglucinol (naturally occurring in redwoods, tea, citrus, apples) as a precursor, noting this ensured synthetic accessibility regardless of regulatory changes.
**Human potency:**
Shulgin estimated TMA-6 to have approximately 8–10× the potency of mescaline in humans. For reference, mescaline's typical oral threshold is ~100 mg (0.36 mmol/kg for a 70-kg person); TMA-6's active range begins at 25 mg (~0.11 mmol/kg), consistent with this potency estimate.
**Research chemical market:**
TMA-6 has appeared on the illicit and grey-market research chemical market, though to a limited extent compared to more popular members such as TMA-2. It was detected in forensic samples, prompting the development of a specific LC-MS assay (Nieddu et al. 2008 [Ref 10]) for TMA, TMA-2, and TMA-6 in urine. Trimethoxyamphetamine was also detected as an adulterant in herbal weight-loss products in Iran [confirmed by OpenAlex cross-reference].
---
## Subjective Effects
Published subjective effect data derives primarily from Shulgin's PiHKAL [Ref 8, Ref 21] and the 1969 Nature paper [Ref 12]. There are no controlled human clinical studies with standardized psychometric instruments.
**From PiHKAL (#162) [Ref 8, Ref 21]:**
- At lower doses: mental clarity, smooth thinking, mild body awareness
- At moderate-to-higher doses: body tingling, intoxication-like euphoria, visual phenomena described as "very, very active, visual, colorful" with "great humor," steady physical control
- One participant noted "a strange mixture of plateaus, exuberance, and strong negative feelings" with psychological insights
- Shulgin's overall characterization: "one of the most rewarding and pleasurable of the methoxylated amphetamines"
**Dose (PiHKAL):** 25–50 mg orally
**Duration (PiHKAL):** 12–16 hours total
**Seed data dosage cross-check:**
The seed data lists: Threshold 5 mg, Light 10–20 mg, Common 20–35 mg, Strong 35–50 mg, Heavy 50+ mg.
Shulgin's PiHKAL dose entry is simply "25–50 mg" — this suggests Shulgin's active range begins where the seed data's "common" range does. The seed data threshold of 5 mg and light range of 10–20 mg do not appear in the primary Shulgin literature. They are likely derived from community self-reports and may represent dose sensitivity in some individuals or potentially impure samples. **Flag: Seed data threshold/light dose not confirmed by primary literature.** The PsychonautWiki dose range [Ref 9] corroborates the seed data community values but these remain unverifiable against controlled studies.
**Effects taxonomy alignment (from the brief):**
The reported effects profile (touch enhancement, tracers, color alteration, visual drifting, empathy enhancement, emotional enhancement, stimulation, time alteration) is broadly consistent with 5-HT₂A agonism and the known phenethylamine psychedelic profile. The relatively high stimulation component is consistent with the amphetamine backbone. The long aftereffects (6–18 hours) may reflect MAO-A inhibition. No controlled study has mapped specific effect domains for TMA-6.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
**LD₅₀ / toxic dose:**
No published LD₅₀ data for TMA-6 in any species was found. The seed data correctly states "toxic dose is unknown."
**Preclinical toxicity:**
Hardman, Haavik & Seevers (1973) [Ref 3] studied mescaline and seven analogs across five species of laboratory animals. This paper likely includes TMA isomers given Shulgin's 1969 publication, but the abstract does not specify which seven analogs were studied. The paper is a primary animal toxicity data source for this chemical class.
**Adverse effects from human self-reports (PiHKAL [Ref 8, Ref 21]):**
- At higher doses: "strong negative feelings," potential psychological instability
- The original TMA (3,4,5-isomer) was associated with anger, hostility, and megalomaniac euphoria in early Shulgin studies (1961 Nature paper), particularly at high doses — a response not observed with mescaline. The extent to which TMA-6 shares this risk profile is unknown.
- No case reports of overdose with TMA-6 were found in the published medical literature.
**Cardiovascular:**
As an amphetamine-backbone compound with 5-HT₂A agonist activity, TMA-6 is expected to produce sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects (tachycardia, hypertension, vasoconstriction) consistent with both the amphetamine backbone and 5-HT₂A stimulation. The seed data lists "Vasoconstriction," "Abnormal heartbeat," and "Wakefulness" as body effects, consistent with this expectation. No published human cardiovascular data exists for TMA-6 specifically.
**Serotonin syndrome risk:**
The MAO-A inhibitory activity (IC₅₀ ~400 nM, if confirmed) represents a clinically significant risk. Serotonin syndrome could theoretically be precipitated when TMA-6 is combined with serotonergic agents (SSRIs, SNRIs, other MAO inhibitors, tryptamines, other 5-HT₂A agonists). **Safety-critical: see Interactions section.**
**Psychological risks:**
Like all classical psychedelic phenethylamines, TMA-6 carries risk of acute anxiety, paranoia, challenging psychological experiences ("bad trips"), and—at very high doses or in vulnerable populations—psychosis. No peer-reviewed literature on TMA-6-specific psychological risks exists.
---
## Harm Reduction
No published harm reduction protocols specific to TMA-6 exist. The following are derived by class-level inference from published psychedelic harm reduction literature [Ref 2 — Nichols 2018; Ref 7 — Monte et al. 1997]:
- **Set and setting:** Critical for all 5-HT₂A psychedelics; Shulgin's PiHKAL reports emphasize psychological stability of participants [Ref 8]
- **Dosing:** Start at low end of the range (25 mg per Shulgin); titration is critical given the long duration
- **Duration:** Users must be prepared for a 12–16 hour experience with 6–18 hours of aftereffects; no obligations should be scheduled
- **Drug interactions (critical):** Avoid MAO inhibitors (risk of serotonin crisis); avoid other serotonergic drugs; avoid stimulants that may synergize cardiovascular effects
- **Testing:** Ehrlich reagent will not react (no indole); Marquis reagent may give a weak orange/brown reaction for amphetamine skeleton. Froehde may help identify methoxy pattern. No specific reagent test data for TMA-6 was found; confirmatory GC-MS or LC-MS/MS is recommended [Ref 10, Ref 11]
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
**Tolerance:**
The seed data states tolerance builds "almost immediately after ingestion," with a half-life of 3 days and full reset at 7 days. These values are consistent with the established cross-tolerance profile of 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics as a class (5-HT₂A receptor downregulation). No TMA-6-specific tolerance studies exist; the values are appropriately inferred from the class. **Flag as class-inference, not substance-specific data.**
**Cross-tolerance:**
Listed as cross-tolerant with "psychedelic" class broadly. Published literature on 5-HT₂A psychedelics confirms cross-tolerance within the class (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DOx compounds all share 5-HT₂A downregulation mechanism) [Ref 2].
**Dependence:**
Seed data states "not habit-forming." Classical 5-HT₂A psychedelics generally lack reinforcing properties and dependence liability. No TMA-6-specific dependence studies exist, but class-level inference supports this characterization.
---
## Interactions
**Critical interaction concern — MAO-A inhibition:**
If TMA-6's MAO-A IC₅₀ of ~400 nM is confirmed, the compound would inhibit the primary serotonin-degrading enzyme with clinically relevant potency. This creates a significant serotonin syndrome risk when combined with:
- SSRIs/SNRIs (serotonin reuptake inhibitors)
- MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline)
- Other irreversible or reversible MAOI antidepressants
- Tryptamine psychedelics (DMT, psilocin, 5-MeO-DMT)
- Other 5-HT₂A agonists
**Published drug interaction data** for TMA-6 specifically: none found. Class-level guidance is provided by Halman et al. 2023 [systemic review of psychedelic drug-drug interactions — found in OpenAlex].
**Stimulant interactions:**
The amphetamine backbone suggests potential additive cardiovascular toxicity with other stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA).
**Contraindications (class-level inference, no TMA-6-specific data):**
- Concurrent MAO inhibitor use (absolute)
- Personal or family history of psychosis or schizophrenia
- Cardiac arrhythmia or uncontrolled hypertension
- Pregnancy/breastfeeding (no data)
---
## Legal Status
| Jurisdiction | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Schedule I | Listed as positional isomer of 3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA, DEA code 7390). May also fall under Federal Analogue Act as structurally similar to mescaline (Schedule I). |
| United Kingdom | Illegal | Covered under the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (blanket ban on psychoactive substances). Also arguably covered under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 generic phenethylamine provisions. |
| Germany | Controlled | NpSG (New Psychoactive Substances Act) since November 26, 2016. Production, import, and sale for human use is punishable. |
| Sweden | Schedule I narcotic | Listed on Swedish narcotic schedules. |
| Brazil | Controlled | F2 class of prohibited psychotropics. |
| Japan | Controlled | Scheduled under drug control legislation. |
| Italy | Controlled | Listed on Italian drug schedules. |
| Finland | Controlled | Banned December 2014. |
| Australia | Not confirmed | Status not independently verified during this research session. |
| Canada | Not confirmed | Status not independently verified during this research session. |
**Note on US status:** The DEA orange book groups TMA and its positional isomers under code 7390. Whether TMA-6 (2,4,6-isomer) is explicitly named or covered implicitly requires editorial verification against the current DEA orange book. The Federal Analogue Act also provides a basis for prosecution if TMA-6 is intended for human consumption, given structural similarity to mescaline.
---
## Clinical Trials
No clinical trials for TMA-6 (2,4,6-trimethoxyamphetamine) were found on ClinicalTrials.gov. The compound has not entered formal clinical development.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. No community feedback items to analyze.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Safety-Critical Flags
1. **⚠️ PRIMARY SOURCE UNVERIFIED — 5-HT₂A EC₅₀ 29.2 nM:** This value is reported by Wikipedia and attributed to the Luethi/Liechti group, but the specific primary publication was not located during this research. The Kolaczynska 2019 [Ref 19] and 2021 [Ref 20] papers from that group do not directly test TMA-6. Editorial review should identify this source before publication, or the value should be presented with explicit uncertainty.
2. **⚠️ PRIMARY SOURCE UNVERIFIED — MAO-A IC₅₀ 400 nM:** Same situation as EC₅₀ value. The Scorza 1997 [Ref 4], Deeb/Clare 2008 [Ref 5], and Gallardo-Godoy 2005 [Ref 16] papers provide SAR context for MAO-A inhibition in this compound class, but none directly report a TMA-6 IC₅₀ of 400 nM in retrievable abstracts.
3. **⚠️ DOSE DATA — Threshold/light dose not confirmed by primary literature:** Shulgin's PiHKAL entry reports dose as simply "25–50 mg" with no sub-threshold or light range. The seed data threshold of 5 mg and light range of 10–20 mg are community-derived. Given that TMA-6 has MAO-A inhibitory activity, unusual dose sensitivity in some individuals is pharmacologically plausible, but this has not been studied.
### Data Corrections
4. **❌ INCORRECT CLASSIFICATION — "Monoamine releasing agent":** Multiple data sources confirm TMA-6 is NOT a monoamine releasing agent (EC₅₀ >100,000 nM at monoamine transporters). This pharmacological class should be removed. Correct classification: 5-HT₂A receptor agonist (full agonist), MAO-A inhibitor.
### Data Gaps
5. **No human pharmacokinetic data:** Tmax, Cmax, bioavailability, elimination half-life, and metabolic pathway (CYP enzymes involved) are all unknown for TMA-6 specifically.
6. **No LD₅₀ or toxicity data:** The toxic dose in any species is unknown. Class-level animal toxicity data (Hardman et al. 1973 [Ref 3]) may include TMA-6 but abstract did not specify which isomers were included.
7. **No case reports:** No published case reports of TMA-6 overdose, adverse events, or clinical presentations in emergency settings were found.
8. **Metabolism unknown:** No CYP enzyme or metabolite data published for TMA-6. Metabolic pathway is inferred by structural class only.
9. **Stereochemistry unstudied:** Enantioselectivity at 5-HT₂A not determined for TMA-6. Active enantiomer is presumed to be (R) by analogy with other phenylisopropylamine psychedelics [Ref 2], but no study confirmed this.
10. **Legal status gaps:** Australia, Canada, and several EU countries not confirmed during this research session.
11. **Structural analog inference for most pharmacological data:** All pharmacokinetic, metabolism, and most receptor data is inferred from structural class (trimethoxyphenethylamine/amphetamine psychedelics), not measured directly for TMA-6. This applies to: CYP enzymes, serotonin syndrome risk parameters, and cardiovascular toxicity profile.