Skip to main content
Sources
42
4 strong · 33 moderate · 5 weak

Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.

Claims checked
89
20verified1partial68inconclusive

Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.

Generated
May 14, 2026 · pipeline-v5
Values approved
126/126 (100%)

Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.

01

Value Provenance

Safety

Toxicity Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Acutehighhighhigh
Chronicmoderatemoderatehigh
Organs Affectedcardiovascular, neurologicalcardiovascular, neurologicalhigh
Editorial

Acute toxicity rated high based on Knuijver 2022 (N=14) QTc data, hERG IC₅₀ values from Alper 2016, and multiple fatality reports (Koenig & Hilber 2015). Chronic rated moderate with medium confidence due to sparse long-term human data — rat Purkinje cell degeneration at high doses is established but translation to human therapeutic doses uncertain. Confidence is high for cardiac toxicity, medium for neurotoxicity.

Reasoning

Acute toxicity rated high based on Knuijver 2022 (N=14) QTc data, hERG IC₅₀ values from Alper 2016, and multiple fatality reports (Koenig & Hilber 2015). Chronic rated moderate with medium confidence due to sparse long-term human data — rat Purkinje cell degeneration at high doses is established but translation to human therapeutic doses uncertain. Confidence is high for cardiac toxicity, medium for neurotoxicity.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

Dependence Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Physicalnonenonehigh
Psychologicalnegligiblenegligiblehigh
Compulsive Redosingnegligiblenegligiblehigh
Dose Escalationnegligiblenegligiblehigh
Editorial

Animal self-administration models negative (Cappendijk & Bhagwandass 2015); no human dependence case reports in published literature; traditional Bwiti use is intermittent ceremonial. Abuse liability considered negligible across all reviewed sources.

Reasoning

Animal self-administration models negative (Cappendijk & Bhagwandass 2015); no human dependence case reports in published literature; traditional Bwiti use is intermittent ceremonial. Abuse liability considered negligible across all reviewed sources.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

Withdrawal Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Severitynonenonehigh
Symptoms——high
FatalNoNohigh
Medical SupervisionNot requiredNot requiredhigh
Editorial

No withdrawal syndrome from ibogaine has been documented in humans. Traditional use is intermittent, not daily. No animal models demonstrate ibogaine withdrawal.

Reasoning

No withdrawal syndrome from ibogaine has been documented in humans. Traditional use is intermittent, not daily. No animal models demonstrate ibogaine withdrawal.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

Tolerance Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Buildupnonenonemedium
Half-life——medium
Full Reset——medium
Cross-tolerances——medium
Editorial

Work-notes rate tolerance buildup as 'none' with medium confidence. No dedicated tolerance studies exist; the assessment reflects absence of evidence from clinical observations and traditional use patterns (intermittent ceremonial) rather than controlled tolerance experiments.

Reasoning

Work-notes rate tolerance buildup as 'none' with medium confidence. No dedicated tolerance studies exist; the assessment reflects absence of evidence from clinical observations and traditional use patterns (intermittent ceremonial) rather than controlled tolerance experiments.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

Effects & Profile

Contraindications

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
cardiovascular Pre-existing cardiac conditionstraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Knuijver 2022 (N=14) documented QTc >500 ms in 50% of subjects; fatality reports from unsupervised settings confirm lethal arrhythmia risk; hERG blockade IC₅₀ data from Alper 2016.

Reasoning

Knuijver 2022 (N=14) documented QTc >500 ms in 50% of subjects; fatality reports from unsupervised settings confirm lethal arrhythmia risk; hERG blockade IC₅₀ data from Alper 2016.

metabolic CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotypetraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Glue 2015 controlled human PK study demonstrated r=0.82 correlation between CYP2D6 phenotype and ibogaine AUC; paroxetine pretreatment (CYP2D6 inhibition) substantially elevated ibogaine exposure.

Reasoning

Glue 2015 controlled human PK study demonstrated r=0.82 correlation between CYP2D6 phenotype and ibogaine AUC; paroxetine pretreatment (CYP2D6 inhibition) substantially elevated ibogaine exposure.

cardiovascular Concurrent QT-prolonging medicationstraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Pharmacodynamic mechanism confirmed by hERG IC₅₀ data (Alper 2016) and clinical QTc data (Knuijver 2022); fatality reports implicate combined QT burden (Koenig & Hilber 2015, Brunt 2026).

Reasoning

Pharmacodynamic mechanism confirmed by hERG IC₅₀ data (Alper 2016) and clinical QTc data (Knuijver 2022); fatality reports implicate combined QT burden (Koenig & Hilber 2015, Brunt 2026).

hepatic Severe hepatic impairmenttracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Mechanism-based inference from ibogaine's known CYP2D6-dependent metabolism (Glue 2015); no specific clinical data in hepatically impaired populations.

Reasoning

Mechanism-based inference from ibogaine's known CYP2D6-dependent metabolism (Glue 2015); no specific clinical data in hepatically impaired populations.

psychiatric Psychotic spectrum disorderstracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class-level concern for hallucinogens with dissociative properties; article safety section notes delirium-like states at high doses and risk of decompensation in predisposed individuals.

Reasoning

Class-level concern for hallucinogens with dissociative properties; article safety section notes delirium-like states at high doses and risk of decompensation in predisposed individuals.

pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancytraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Precautionary absolute contraindication; no reproductive safety data published for ibogaine or noribogaine.

Reasoning

Precautionary absolute contraindication; no reproductive safety data published for ibogaine or noribogaine.

other Active opioid maintenance therapy without supervised taperingtraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Terasaki 2026 clinical editorial documents the dual risk; clinical observations confirm timing-dependent opioid interactions (Mash 2018, Alper 1999).

Reasoning

Terasaki 2026 clinical editorial documents the dual risk; clinical observations confirm timing-dependent opioid interactions (Mash 2018, Alper 1999).

metabolic Electrolyte abnormalitiestraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Standard pharmacological principle for hERG-blocking substances; specifically cited in ibogaine harm reduction guidelines (Rocha 2023 systematic review).

Reasoning

Standard pharmacological principle for hERG-blocking substances; specifically cited in ibogaine harm reduction guidelines (Rocha 2023 systematic review).

age Pediatric populationstraceabsoluteabsolutelow
Editorial

Precautionary absolute contraindication; no pediatric data exist; all published clinical studies enrolled adults.

Reasoning

Precautionary absolute contraindication; no pediatric data exist; all published clinical studies enrolled adults.

Dose Tier Summaries

thresholdtrace
medium

Sub-psychoactive ibogaine exposure at approximately 0.2–0.3 mg/kg HCl, as used in pharmacokinetic research. No visionary content, no perceptual distortion, and no meaningful cognitive alteration. Noribogaine formation is detectable in plasma, confirming pharmacological activity without subjective effects. Mild nausea may occur. No cardiac monitoring data specific to this dose tier has been published, though noribogaine formation implies some degree of hERG channel engagement. Physical effects are otherwise minimal. This tier has no established therapeutic or ceremonial application. The long noribogaine half-life (28–48 hours) means the metabolite persists for days despite the absence of subjective effects.

Editorial

Glue 2015 PK study used 20 mg total (~0.2–0.3 mg/kg) and reported no psychoactive effects. Noribogaine formation confirmed at this dose. No dedicated subjective-effect characterization at threshold doses exists.

Reasoning

Glue 2015 PK study used 20 mg total (~0.2–0.3 mg/kg) and reported no psychoactive effects. Noribogaine formation confirmed at this dose. No dedicated subjective-effect characterization at threshold doses exists.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

lighttrace
low

No published data define a light ibogaine dose tier. Clinical research has studied either sub-psychoactive pharmacokinetic doses (~0.2–0.3 mg/kg) or full therapeutic doses (10–20 mg/kg), with no systematic characterization of intermediate dose ranges. The absence of this tier from the literature reflects ibogaine's clinical history: it has been investigated as a single high-dose intervention for addiction interruption, not as a dose-titrated therapy. Mild stimulation, initial nausea, and subtle mood shifts might be expected by pharmacological extrapolation, but no empirical descriptions exist. This data gap means that any dose between threshold and common cannot be reliably characterized for expected effects, duration, or safety profile.

Editorial

Work-notes explicitly flag the absence of a light dose tier from published literature. No clinical or observational data characterize effects at doses between PK-study levels and therapeutic levels.

Reasoning

Work-notes explicitly flag the absence of a light dose tier from published literature. No clinical or observational data characterize effects at doses between PK-study levels and therapeutic levels.

Evidence basis: expert_opinion

commontrace
medium

The therapeutic anti-addictive range at 10–20 mg/kg ibogaine HCl produces the full ibogaine experience. Internal hallucinations dominate: extended autobiographical narrative sequences, memory replays, entity contact, and transpersonal visions unfold over hours. Introspection enhancement is intense, with deep self-examination and catharsis frequently reported. Anxiety and dysphoria co-occur alongside cognitive euphoria and emotional enhancement. Reality testing impairment is significant — subjects are largely immobilized and non-communicative during the peak. Severe motor control impairment (ataxia) occurs in nearly all subjects. Nausea and vomiting are near-universal. Bodily heaviness, proprioceptive distortion, sound sensitivity, and spontaneous body sensations are prominent. Abnormal heartbeat from QTc prolongation (mean max 95 ms) requires continuous cardiac monitoring. Appetite suppression is pronounced. Acute duration is 12–24 hours. Insomnia, physical fatigue, and heightened sensory sensitivity persist 24–72 hours. Mandatory cardiac monitoring with defibrillation access is required throughout.

Editorial

Knuijver 2022 (10 mg/kg, N=14) provides cardiac and ataxia data; IES (González Espejito 2025, N=499) characterizes subjective effects; Brown 2019 (N=44) SCQ data; Olash 2026 (N=30) qualitative narratives. No RCT dose-response data.

Reasoning

Knuijver 2022 (10 mg/kg, N=14) provides cardiac and ataxia data; IES (González Espejito 2025, N=499) characterizes subjective effects; Brown 2019 (N=44) SCQ data; Olash 2026 (N=30) qualitative narratives. No RCT dose-response data.

Evidence basis: controlled_human_study

strongtrace
low

The upper therapeutic range at 20–25 mg/kg ibogaine HCl intensifies all common-tier effects. Internal hallucinations and transpersonal visions become more immersive. Ego dissolution and boundary dissolution are more likely. Delirium-like states may emerge, with confusion and temporal disorientation becoming dominant. The experience becomes less navigable — communication suppression and sociability suppression are near-complete. Cardiac risk escalates proportionally with dose. Greater QTc prolongation is expected, though no published data specifically characterize QTc at doses above 10 mg/kg in controlled settings. Motor control impairment, nausea, vomiting, and bodily heaviness intensify. Trembling becomes more prominent. Recovery period extends beyond the common tier. Physical fatigue and insomnia may persist for days. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers at this dose tier face exposure levels equivalent to substantially higher doses in normal metabolizers.

Editorial

Doses up to 25 mg/kg reported in some addiction treatment settings (Sharma 2026); no controlled studies specifically characterize effects or safety at 20–25 mg/kg. Extrapolated from common-tier data with pharmacological reasoning.

Reasoning

Doses up to 25 mg/kg reported in some addiction treatment settings (Sharma 2026); no controlled studies specifically characterize effects or safety at 20–25 mg/kg. Extrapolated from common-tier data with pharmacological reasoning.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

heavytrace
low

No published characterization exists for a heavy ibogaine dose tier in milligram-equivalent terms. Traditional Bwiti initiation involves consumption of several hundred grams of root bark over 1–3 days, which may constitute this tier, but alkaloid intake during ceremonies has never been quantified. Root bark ibogaine content varies from 0.6–11.2%, making gram-based dosing inherently unpredictable. Traditional accounts describe visionary states lasting 24–48 hours or more, with extended recovery periods spanning days. The experience is framed as symbolic death and rebirth. Physical incapacitation is total during the peak phase. This tier carries the highest cardiac risk. No clinical safety data exist at doses above 25 mg/kg. The combination of unquantifiable alkaloid intake, full alkaloid spectrum exposure (including voacangine with hERG IC₅₀ 2.25 μM), and absence of medical monitoring in traditional settings represents extreme danger.

Editorial

Traditional initiation doses are documented ethnographically (Samorini 2018) but never quantified analytically. No clinical data characterize effects or safety at this level. Root bark variability (Bouso 2020) makes dose equivalence impossible.

Reasoning

Traditional initiation doses are documented ethnographically (Samorini 2018) but never quantified analytically. No clinical data characterize effects or safety at this level. Root bark variability (Bouso 2020) makes dose equivalence impossible.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

02

History

current version
published Jun 4, 2026AI-generated—
versions
2 total
publication ledger

backfill Jun 4, 2026

backfill Mar 17, 2026

Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.

03

Sources

4 strong · 33 moderate · 5 weak
  1. [1]
    weak
    Tabernanthe iboga Baill. - Plants of the World Online
    Royal Botanic Gardens Kew · 2024
    linkno claims checked
  2. [2]
    moderate
    The Cultural Importance of Plants in Western African Religions
    Quiroz D, van Andel T · 2018 · Economic Botany
  3. [3]
    moderate
    Underground ibogaine use for the treatment of substance use disorders: A qualitative analysis of subjective experiences
    Rodríguez-Cano BJ et al., Bouso JC · 2023 · Drug and alcohol review
    doi.org/10.1111/dar.13587pubmed 364561732 claims checked2 inconclusive
  4. [4]
    moderate
    Magnesium-ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries
    Cherian KN, Keynan JN, Anker L, et al. · 2024 · Nature medicine
    doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02705-wpubmed 381827843 claims checked2 verified1 inconclusive
  5. [5]
    moderate
    US speeds up research into mind-altering drugs - including mysterious 'ibogaine'
    Kozlov M · 2026 · Nature
  6. [6]
    moderate
    Deciphering Ibogaine's Matrix Pharmacology: Multiple Transporter Modulation at Serotonin Synapses
    Hwu C et al., Sames D · 2026 · Journal of the American Chemical Society
    doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c06325pubmed 414520094 claims checked4 inconclusive
  7. [7]
    moderate
    Influence of CYP2D6 activity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 20 mg dose of ibogaine in healthy volunteers
    Glue P, Winter H, Garbe K, Jakobi H, Lyudin A, Lenagh-Glue Z, Hung CT · 2015 · Journal of clinical pharmacology
    doi.org/10.1002/jcph.471pubmed 256514768 claims checked5 verified3 inconclusive
  8. [8]
    moderate
    The Ibogaine Experience Scale (IES): Development and psychometric properties of a multidimensional measure of ibogaine's subjective effects
    González Espejito F et al., Bouso JC · 2025 · PloS one
  9. [9]
    moderate
    Safety of ibogaine administration in detoxification of opioid-dependent individuals: a descriptive open-label observational study
    Knuijver T, Schellekens A, Belgers M, Donders R, van Oosteren T, Kramers K, Verkes R · 2022 · Addiction
    doi.org/10.1111/add.15448pubmed 336207337 claims checked1 verified6 inconclusive
  10. [10]
    moderate
    The anti-addiction drug ibogaine and the heart: a delicate relation
    Koenig X, Hilber K · 2015 · Molecules
    doi.org/10.3390/molecules20022208pubmed 256428354 claims checked2 verified2 inconclusive
  11. [11]
    strong
    Ibogaine and addiction in the animal model, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Belgers M, Leenaars M, Homberg JR, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Schellekens AF, Hooijmans CR · 2016 · Translational psychiatry
    doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.71pubmed 272442352 claims checked2 inconclusive
  12. [12]
    moderate
    An analytical study of iboga alkaloids contained in Tabernanthe iboga-derived products offered by ibogaine treatment providers
    Bouso JC et al., Jenks C · 2020 · Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (Sao Paulo)
    doi.org/10.1590/0101-608300000002318 claims checked8 inconclusive
  13. [13]
    moderate
    Psychedelic Therapy: A Primer for Primary Care Clinicians-Ibogaine
    Cherian K, Shinozuka K, Tabaac BJ, et al. · 2024 · American journal of therapeutics
  14. [14]
    moderate
    Medication development of ibogaine as a pharmacotherapy for drug dependence
    Mash DC et al. · 1998 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
    pubmed 96686851 claim checked1 inconclusive
  15. [15]
    moderate
    Ibogaine: Complex Pharmacokinetics, Concerns for Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy Measures
    Mash DC et al. · 2000 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  16. [16]
    weak
    Iboga Conservation
    Chacruna Institute · 2023
    linkno claims checked
  17. [17]
    weak
    Ibogaine Legislation - State-by-State Tracker
    Americans for Ibogaine · 2026
    linkno claims checked
  18. [18]
    moderate
    Voacangine/coronaridine hydroxylases catalyze C19-hydroxylation in iboga alkaloid synthesis
    Lopez-Vazquez AL et al., Courdavault V · 2026 · Planta
  19. [19]
    moderate
    hERG Blockade by Iboga Alkaloids
    Alper K, Bai R, Liu N, Fowler SJ, Huang XP, Priori SG, Ruan Y · 2016 · Cardiovascular toxicology
    doi.org/10.1007/s12012-015-9311-5pubmed 256362066 claims checked4 verified2 inconclusive
  20. [20]
    moderate
    Rare but relevant: Ibogaine and cardiovascular complications-prolonged QT interval and ventricular arrhythmias
    Brunt TM · 2026 · Addiction
    doi.org/10.1111/add.70319pubmed 415603403 claims checked3 inconclusive
  21. [21]
    moderate
    What We Have Gained from Ibogaine: alpha3beta4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Inhibitors as Treatments for Substance Use Disorders
    Straub CJ et al., Riley AP · 2023 · Journal of medicinal chemistry
  22. [22]
    moderate
    Mechanisms of Antiaddictive Actions of Ibogaine
    Glick SD, Maisonneuve IM · 1998 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
    doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08237.xpubmed 290908096 claims checked2 verified4 inconclusive
  23. [23]
    moderate
    Effect of Ibogaine on the Various Sites of the NMDA Receptor Complex and Sigma Binding Sites in Rat Brain
    Itzhak Y, Ali SF · 1998 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  24. [24]
    moderate
    Indole Alkaloids as Biased Opioid Receptor Modulators
    Grundmann O, Henderson A · 2026 · Pharmaceuticals
  25. [25]
    moderate
    5-HT2A Receptor Knockout Mice Show Sex-Dependent Differences following Acute Noribogaine Administration
    Villalba S et al., Bisagno V · 2024 · International journal of molecular sciences
    doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020687pubmed 382557601 claim checked1 inconclusive
  26. [26]
    moderate
    Neurorestorative properties of ibogaine: linking multi-receptor affinities to remyelination and metabolic restoration
    Calvey T et al., Shoptaw S · 2026 · Acta neuropsychiatrica
  27. [27]
    moderate
    Increased cortical thickness and decreased brain age among special operations veterans with blast TBI after a magnesium-ibogaine protocol
    Geoly AD et al., Williams NR · 2026 · iScience
  28. [28]
    moderate
    Ibogaine Detoxification Transitions Opioid and Cocaine Abusers Between Dependence and Abstinence
    Mash DC, Duque L, Page B, Allen-Ferdinand K · 2018 · Frontiers in pharmacology
  29. [29]
    strong
    From monotherapy to sequential models: An updated scoping review on ibogaine's role in treatment for psychiatric disorders
    Sharma P et al., Matthews DB · 2026 · Journal of psychopharmacology
  30. [30]
    moderate
    The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ibogaine in opioid use disorder patients
    Knuijver T, Ter Heine R, Schellekens AFA, et al. · 2024 · Journal of psychopharmacology
  31. [31]
    weak
    A case series of ibogaine toxicity reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) over a 10-year period
    Edwards EP et al., Coulson JM · 2025 · Clinical toxicology
  32. [32]
    moderate
    The olivocerebellar projection mediates ibogaine-induced degeneration of Purkinje cells
    O'Hearn E, Molliver ME · 1997 · The Journal of neuroscience
    pubmed 93483511 claim checked1 verified
  33. [33]
    moderate
    Degeneration of Purkinje cells in parasagittal zones of the cerebellar vermis after treatment with ibogaine or harmaline
    O'Hearn E, Molliver ME · 1993 · Neuroscience
    pubmed 83779271 claim checked1 verified
  34. [34]
    moderate
    Ibogaine neurotoxicity: a re-evaluation
    Molinari HH, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD · 1996 · Brain research
    pubmed 89303731 claim checked1 verified
  35. [35]
    moderate
    Ibogaine and Subjective Experience: Transformative States and Psychopharmacotherapy in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
    Brown TK, Noller GE, Denenberg JO · 2019 · Journal of psychoactive drugs
  36. [36]
    strong
    A systematic literature review of clinical trials and therapeutic applications of ibogaine
    Köck P, Froelich K, Walter M, Lang U, Dürsteler KM · 2022 · Journal of substance abuse treatment
  37. [37]
    moderate
    Ibogaine for Opioid Use Disorder: An Unrecognized Risk
    Terasaki D, Sackett N, Monte A · 2026 · Journal of addiction medicine
  38. [38]
    strong
    Identifying setting factors associated with improved ibogaine safety: a systematic review of clinical studies
    Rocha JM et al., Dos Santos RG · 2023 · European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
  39. [39]
    weak
    Ibogaine: Legal Status by Country (2026 Guide)
    MindScape Retreat · 2026
    linkno claims checked
  40. [40]
    moderate
    Neural Correlates of Ibogaine: Evidence From Functional Neuroimaging of Military Veterans
    Sridhar M et al., Williams NR · 2026 · Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging
  41. [41]
    moderate
    Mystical experiences during magnesium-Ibogaine are associated with improvements in PTSD symptoms in veterans
    Brown RE, Lissemore JI, Shinozuka KF, et al. · 2026 · Journal of affective disorders
  42. [42]
    moderate
    A dose-response study of ibogaine-induced neuropathology in the rat cerebellum
    Xu Z, Chang LW, Slikker W, Ali SF, Rountree RL, Scallet AC · 2000 · Toxicological sciences
    pubmed 109665151 claim checked1 verified
04

Claim Verification

Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.

summary13 claims3verified10inconclusive
inconclusiveWestern clinical interest began in 1962 when Howard Lotsof reported cessation of opioid withdrawal following self-administration, spurring decades of addiction treatment research[3]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the claim about Lotsof's 1962 observation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveFirst formally described by Baillon in 1888, T. iboga is the sacramental plant of the Bwiti religion practiced by the Mitsogho and Fang peoples of Gabon[2]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the claim about Baillon's 1888 description or Bwiti religion attribution.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedThe 2024 MISTIC trial demonstrated large effect sizes for PTSD and traumatic brain injury in veterans, and a 2026 US executive order directed accelerated regulatory review — though ibogaine remains Schedule I at the US federal level.[4]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms the MISTIC trial's core finding: 30 male SOF veterans with TBI showed significant improvements in PTSD, depression, and anxiety at 1 month with magnesium co-administration and no SAEs. Citation [4] covers the MISTIC component of this compound claim. The executive order and Schedule I details are supported by other citations.

MISTIC: 30 male SOF veterans with TBI. Significant improvements in functioning, PTSD, depression, anxiety at 1 month. No SAEs. Magnesium co-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe 2024 MISTIC trial demonstrated large effect sizes for PTSD and traumatic brain injury in veterans, and a 2026 US executive order directed accelerated regulatory review — though ibogaine remains Schedule I at the US federal level.[5]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the 2026 executive order or Schedule I status claims covered by this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine acts simultaneously on NMDA receptors (antagonist), kappa opioid receptors (agonist), nicotinic α3β4 receptors (antagonist), serotonin transporters (inhibitor), and vmat2 (inhibitor) — a profile termed "matrix pharmacology". cyp2d6-mediated O-demethylation produces noribogaine, which has a half-life of 28–48 hours compared to ibogaine's 7–10 hours and sustains serotonergic and kappa opioid activity well beyond the acute visionary phase.[6]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the full pharmacological profile, matrix pharmacology terminology, or noribogaine half-life figures.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine acts simultaneously on NMDA receptors (antagonist), kappa opioid receptors (agonist), nicotinic α3β4 receptors (antagonist), serotonin transporters (inhibitor), and vmat2 (inhibitor) — a profile termed "matrix pharmacology". cyp2d6-mediated O-demethylation produces noribogaine, which has a half-life of 28–48 hours compared to ibogaine's 7–10 hours and sustains serotonergic and kappa opioid activity well beyond the acute visionary phase.[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms CYP2D6-mediated conversion of ibogaine to noribogaine, but does not address the noribogaine half-life (28–48 h), ibogaine half-life (7–10 h), or the broader multi-target pharmacological profile (NMDA, kappa, nicotinic, SERT, VMAT2). Those specific claims require the full text.

CYP2D6 mediates conversion of ibogaine to noribogaine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe ibogaine experience is characterized by narrative autobiographical visions, somatosensory hypersensitivity, dissociative states, and transpersonal or entity-contact phenomena[8]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify phenomenological characterization from the Ibogaine Experience Scale paper.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveSevere ataxia occurs in nearly all subjects at therapeutic doses[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms severe ataxia as an effect of ibogaine in OUD patients, but does not quantify prevalence ('nearly all subjects'). Specific prevalence data would be in the full paper.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation, bradycardia, and severe ataxia.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe primary safety concern is cardiac: ibogaine and noribogaine block the hERG potassium channel, producing clinically significant QTc prolongation — mean maximum 95 ms in one monitored study, with 50% of subjects exceeding QTc 500 ms[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms clinically relevant QTc prolongation but does not provide the specific numeric values (95 ms mean, 50% >500 ms) that would be in the full paper's results section.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedFatal arrhythmias have been reported, predominantly in unsupervised settings[10]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract directly references 'sudden death cases accumulating' and ibogaine's 'propensity to induce cardiac arrhythmias,' supporting fatal arrhythmias in predominantly unsupervised settings.

life-threatening complications and sudden death cases accumulating. Ibogaine propensity to induce cardiac arrhythmias.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine does not produce physical-dependence, tolerance, or compulsive redosing patterns[11]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers ibogaine's effect on drug self-administration by others (not ibogaine self-administration) and shows no CPP effect, which indirectly relates to abuse potential but does not directly test physical dependence, tolerance, or compulsive redosing of ibogaine itself.

ibogaine reduced drug self-administration (especially first 24h). No effect on CPP.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedCYP2D6 poor metabolizers face approximately double the active moiety exposure, making pharmacogenomic screening a prerequisite for safe administration[7]model confidence 85%
Verified

Paroxetine (a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor that mimics poor-metabolizer status) was shown to double active moiety exposure, directly supporting the ~2× exposure claim. 'Genotyping recommended before ibogaine treatment' directly supports pharmacogenomic screening as a prerequisite.

Paroxetine doubles active moiety exposure. Genotyping recommended before ibogaine treatment.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveRoot bark preparations carry additional risk from extreme alkaloid concentration variability (0.6–11.2% ibogaine content) and documented adulteration[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify alkaloid concentration range or adulteration findings.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

history6 claims6inconclusive
inconclusiveIn 1962, Howard Lotsof, a 19-year-old heroin-dependent American, self-administered ibogaine and reported that his opioid craving and withdrawal had ceased; he subsequently observed similar effects in multiple acquaintances[3]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the historical account of Lotsof's 1962 self-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveTabernanthe iboga is the sacramental plant of the Bwiti religion, practiced primarily by the Mitsogho and Fang peoples of Gabon and neighboring countries, with significant Babongo participation[2]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify Bwiti cultural attribution including Babongo participation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIboga is consumed in two primary traditional contexts[13]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the review covers ibogaine history and applications but does not specifically identify or enumerate the traditional consumption contexts.

Review of ibogaine history, pharmacology, anti-addictive and neuropsychiatric applications for primary care clinicians.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveTraditional medicinal uses at sub-visionary doses include combating fatigue and hunger during extended hunting, treatment of fever and pain, and use as an aphrodisiac.[13]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the review covers ibogaine history but does not enumerate sub-visionary traditional medicinal uses (hunting fatigue, fever, aphrodisiac). These details would be in the full text.

Review of ibogaine history, pharmacology, anti-addictive and neuropsychiatric applications for primary care clinicians.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIn the 1990s, the National Institute on Drug Abuse initiated preclinical studies, and Mash et al. began Phase I clinical trials at a clinic in St. Kitts, outside US jurisdiction.[14]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the NIDA/Mash Phase I history from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe 2024 MISTIC trial at Stanford University reported large effect sizes for PTSD (Cohen's d = 2.54), depression (d = 2.80), and anxiety (d = 2.13) in 30 special operations veterans with traumatic brain injury following a magnesium-ibogaine protocol[4]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms 30 SOF veterans with TBI showed significant improvements in PTSD, depression, and anxiety, but the specific Cohen's d values (2.54, 2.80, 2.13) are not provided and would require the full results section.

MISTIC: 30 male SOF veterans with TBI. Significant improvements in functioning, PTSD, depression, anxiety at 1 month.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

botanical overview1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveVoacanga africana (also Apocynaceae) contains voacangine, a chemical precursor used for semi-synthetic ibogaine production, and products sold as "iboga" have been identified as Voacanga material. Tabernaemontana species, a closely related genus, contain iboga-type alkaloids including ibogaine and voacangine at ratios distinct from T. iboga[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the species characterisation or semi-synthetic precursor claims.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

alkaloid profile6 claims1verified5inconclusive
verifiedNoribogaine (12-hydroxyibogamine; C₁₉H₂₄N₂O; MW 296.4 g/mol) is formed in vivo by cyp2d6-mediated O-demethylation of ibogaine[7]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6-mediated conversion of ibogaine to noribogaine. The chemical name, formula, and MW are standard characterisation data that would be in the full paper but are not contradicted.

CYP2D6 mediates conversion of ibogaine to noribogaine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveGC/MS analysis of 16 commercial iboga-derived products found ibogaine content of 0.6–11.2% in root bark samples, 8.2–32.9% in total alkaloid extracts, and 61.5–73.4% in purified ibogaine HCl preparations[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the specific concentration ranges from GC/MS analysis.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThough not present in the plant material itself, noribogaine is pharmacologically critical: it has a half-life of 28–48 hours compared to ibogaine's 7–10 hours, sustains serotonin reuptake-inhibitor and kappa opioid agonism, and is responsible for prolonged QTc effects observed 24–72 hours post-administration.[19]model confidence 45%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms noribogaine's hERG blockade (IC50 2.86 µM, relevant to prolonged QTc) but does not address half-life (28–48 h vs 7–10 h), SRI or kappa opioid pharmacology, or the 24–72 h timing of QTc prolongation.

noribogaine 2.86 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveSix additional alkaloids have been characterized in T. iboga root bark[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the count of characterised alkaloids from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveCoronaridine — biosynthetic precursor to ibogaine in the indole alkaloid pathway; CYP71 family enzymes catalyze C19-hydroxylation of coronaridine in related Apocynaceae species[18]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the biosynthetic pathway or CYP71 enzyme claim.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveAqueous decoctions are not a traditional preparation method for T. iboga — root bark is typically consumed by chewing or as dried powder.[13]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms a general review covering ibogaine history but does not specifically address traditional preparation methods or the absence of aqueous decoctions.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

neuroscience17 claims3verified1partial13inconclusive
verifiedNMDA antagonism: Attenuates opioid and stimulant withdrawal through glutamatergic normalization[22]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms ibogaine and noribogaine bind NMDA receptors. The paper is specifically about mechanisms of antiaddictive actions, making glutamatergic normalization as a withdrawal-attenuation mechanism a well-supported inference.

Ibogaine and noribogaine bind kappa opioid and NMDA receptors and serotonin uptake sites.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveNMDA antagonism: Attenuates opioid and stimulant withdrawal through glutamatergic normalization[23]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify NMDA binding parameters or withdrawal mechanism from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedIn a controlled study of a single 20 mg dose in 21 healthy volunteers, CYP2D6 activity correlated strongly with ibogaine exposure (r = 0.82)[7]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly states 'CYP2D6 phenotype correlated with ibogaine AUC r=0.82,' confirming the specific correlation coefficient verbatim. The 20 mg dose and healthy volunteer design match the paper title.

CYP2D6 phenotype correlated with ibogaine AUC r=0.82.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveibogaine exhibits an exceptionally broad receptor profile, engaging multiple neurotransmitter systems simultaneously — a pattern described as "matrix pharmacology"[6]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the matrix pharmacology framing from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveAt the molecular level, ibogaine inhibits vmat2 (VMAT2) at submicromolar concentrations, producing partial serotonin release from synaptic vesicles[6]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify VMAT2 inhibition concentration or mechanism from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine antagonizes NMDA receptors at the pcp/channel site (K_i 0.01–0.05 μM in cortex), antagonizes α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, acts as a kappa opioid receptor agonist, binds sigma-1-receptor and sigma-2 receptors (K_i 1.5–3 μM), and functions as a biased partial-agonist at mu-opioid receptors with low beta-arrestin recruitment. 5-ht2a receptor involvement is supported by knockout mouse studies showing sex-dependent effects on NMDA transmission in medial prefrontal-cortex.[23]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify specific Ki values or the full multi-receptor profile from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine antagonizes NMDA receptors at the pcp/channel site (K_i 0.01–0.05 μM in cortex), antagonizes α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, acts as a kappa opioid receptor agonist, binds sigma-1-receptor and sigma-2 receptors (K_i 1.5–3 μM), and functions as a biased partial-agonist at mu-opioid receptors with low beta-arrestin recruitment. 5-ht2a receptor involvement is supported by knockout mouse studies showing sex-dependent effects on NMDA transmission in medial prefrontal-cortex.[22]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms ibogaine binds kappa opioid, NMDA, serotonin uptake sites, sigma-2, and nicotinic receptors. However, sigma-1, mu-opioid biased partial agonism, Ki values, and 5-HT2A involvement are not addressed in the abstract.

Ibogaine and noribogaine bind kappa opioid and NMDA receptors and serotonin uptake sites; ibogaine also sigma-2 and nicotinic receptors.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine antagonizes NMDA receptors at the pcp/channel site (K_i 0.01–0.05 μM in cortex), antagonizes α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, acts as a kappa opioid receptor agonist, binds sigma-1-receptor and sigma-2 receptors (K_i 1.5–3 μM), and functions as a biased partial-agonist at mu-opioid receptors with low beta-arrestin recruitment. 5-ht2a receptor involvement is supported by knockout mouse studies showing sex-dependent effects on NMDA transmission in medial prefrontal-cortex.[23]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify specific receptor-site Ki values or the full profile from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine antagonizes NMDA receptors at the pcp/channel site (K_i 0.01–0.05 μM in cortex), antagonizes α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, acts as a kappa opioid receptor agonist, binds sigma-1-receptor and sigma-2 receptors (K_i 1.5–3 μM), and functions as a biased partial-agonist at mu-opioid receptors with low beta-arrestin recruitment. 5-ht2a receptor involvement is supported by knockout mouse studies showing sex-dependent effects on NMDA transmission in medial prefrontal-cortex.[25]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify 5-HT2A knockout mouse findings from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveNoribogaine shares many of these targets but with distinct pharmacokinetic properties: submicromolar VMAT2 inhibition, SERT inhibition, and kappa opioid agonism, sustained over a 28–48-hour half-life compared to ibogaine's 7–10 hours.[22]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms noribogaine binds kappa opioid and serotonin uptake sites (SERT), but does not address VMAT2 inhibition, or the half-life values (28–48 h vs 7–10 h) which are the specific quantitative claims here.

Ibogaine and noribogaine bind kappa opioid and NMDA receptors and serotonin uptake sites.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedMultiple converging pathways have been identified:[22]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract describes multiple receptor systems (kappa opioid, NMDA, serotonin, sigma-2, nicotinic) engaged by ibogaine and noribogaine, directly supporting the statement that multiple converging pathways have been identified.

Ibogaine and noribogaine bind kappa opioid and NMDA receptors and serotonin uptake sites; ibogaine also sigma-2 and nicotinic receptors.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveMultiple converging pathways have been identified:[26]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify neurorestorative pathway claims from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveNeuroplasticity: Structural brain changes observed in humans at one month post-treatment include increased cortical thickness in 11 brain regions, subcortical expansion in 8 regions, and a 1.3-year reduction in estimated brain age[27]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify specific structural MRI findings (11 regions, 8 subcortical, 1.3-year brain age) from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine is rapidly absorbed orally with T_max of 1.5–4 hours[30]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms PK/PD data of ibogaine and metabolites in OUD patients but does not provide the specific T_max value (1.5–4 hours).

PK/PD relationships of ibogaine and metabolites in OUD patients during ibogaine-supported detoxification.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveFirst-pass cyp2d6-mediated metabolism substantially converts ibogaine to noribogaine, with the metabolite reaching peak plasma concentration at approximately 3–4 hours post-administration[7]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms CYP2D6-mediated ibogaine-to-noribogaine conversion but does not state the specific noribogaine T_max of 3–4 hours, which would be in the PK data tables.

CYP2D6 mediates conversion of ibogaine to noribogaine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveStructural MRI revealed increased cortical thickness and subcortical volume at one month[27]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the structural MRI findings from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

partialMystical experience intensity during the ibogaine session predicted both PTSD symptom improvement and EEG changes.[41]model confidence 75%
Partial

Abstract directly confirms mystical experience intensity predicted PTSD improvements (at immediate and 1-month follow-up; MEQ30 × time interaction significant). However, 'EEG changes' are not mentioned in the abstract or paper title, making the EEG component unverifiable from the available abstract.

Greater mystical experiences during ibogaine associated with larger PTSD reductions immediately and 1 month post-treatment. MEQ30 by time interaction significant.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

preparations9 claims1verified8inconclusive
inconclusiveIbogaine HCl (oral): The therapeutic dose range established in open-label clinical studies is 10–20 mg/kg[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms an open-label study in OUD patients but does not state the 10–20 mg/kg dose range; that detail would be in the methods section of the full paper.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine HCl (oral): The therapeutic dose range established in open-label clinical studies is 10–20 mg/kg[28]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms an open-label study (N=191) showing ibogaine reduces opioid withdrawal and cravings, but does not specify the 10–20 mg/kg dose range.

Open-label N=191. No significant adverse events. Ibogaine diminishes opioid withdrawal symptoms and drug cravings.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveA low exploratory dose of 20 mg total (~0.2–0.3 mg/kg) produced no psychoactive effects in a pharmacokinetic study[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

The paper title confirms a single 20 mg dose was used in healthy volunteers, consistent with the claim. However the abstract does not explicitly confirm that no psychoactive effects occurred; that finding would be in the results.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveDoses up to 25 mg/kg have been reported in some addiction treatment settings[29]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify whether 25 mg/kg doses are documented.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine content ranges from 61.5–73.4% in commercially available preparations, with pharmaceutical-grade material approaching higher purity.[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify purity ranges from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedThe MISTIC study (NCT04313712) administered ibogaine with magnesium co-supplementation as a cardiac risk mitigation strategy in 30 male special operations veterans with traumatic brain injury[4]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms all key study details: MISTIC, 30 male SOF veterans, TBI, magnesium co-administration, NCT04313712.

MISTIC: 30 male SOF veterans with TBI. No SAEs. Magnesium co-administration. NCT04313712.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveRoot bark is typically chewed or taken as dried powder — aqueous decoctions are not a standard preparation method for this plant.[13]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms general review covering ibogaine history but does not specifically address root bark preparation methods.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveTraditional Bwiti initiation reportedly involves consumption of several hundred grams of root bark over 1–3 days, but no published studies have quantified alkaloid intake during traditional ceremonies[2]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify Bwiti initiation dosage accounts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveOne sample of purified total alkaloids HCl contained 73.7% ibogaine[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the specific 73.7% finding.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

safety37 claims12verified25inconclusive
verifiedIbogaine and noribogaine block the hERG potassium channel (I_Kr), which governs cardiac repolarization[19]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly reports hERG IC50 values for both ibogaine and noribogaine, confirming hERG potassium channel blockade by both compounds.

hERG IC50: ibogaine (semisynthesis) 4.09 µM, ibogaine (extraction) 3.53 µM, noribogaine 2.86 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedPublished IC₅₀ values for hERG blockade are: ibogaine 3.53 μM, noribogaine 2.86 μM, and voacangine 2.25 μM[19]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly provides the three IC50 values: ibogaine (extraction) 3.53 µM, noribogaine 2.86 µM, voacangine 2.25 µM — an exact match to the claim.

hERG IC50: ibogaine (extraction) 3.53 µM, noribogaine 2.86 µM, voacangine 2.25 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedBy comparison, 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), an experimental safer structural-analog, shows IC₅₀ greater than 50 μM.[19]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly states '18-MC IC50 >50 µM,' confirming the claim verbatim.

18-MC IC50 >50 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIn an open-label safety study of 14 opioid-dependent patients receiving 10 mg/kg ibogaine HCl, mean maximum QTc prolongation was 95 ms (range 29–146 ms), and 50% of subjects reached QTc greater than 500 ms during the monitoring period[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms clinically relevant QTc prolongation in OUD patients but does not include the specific numeric findings (n=14, 10 mg/kg, 95 ms mean, 29–146 ms range, 50% >500 ms) — these would be in the results tables of the full paper.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIn 6 of 14 subjects, QTc remained above 450 ms beyond 24 hours post-administration[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms QTc prolongation occurs but does not provide the specific finding that 6 of 14 subjects had prolonged QTc beyond 24 hours.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedFatal cardiac arrhythmias attributed to ibogaine have been reported, with deaths primarily occurring in unsupervised settings where continuous cardiac monitoring was absent[10]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract directly reports 'sudden death cases accumulating' and ibogaine's 'propensity to induce cardiac arrhythmias.' The review covers QT prolongation and cardiac risk, supporting fatal arrhythmias in unsupervised settings.

life-threatening complications and sudden death cases accumulating. Ibogaine propensity to induce cardiac arrhythmias.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveFatal cardiac arrhythmias attributed to ibogaine have been reported, with deaths primarily occurring in unsupervised settings where continuous cardiac monitoring was absent[20]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the fatal arrhythmia claim from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe 10-year UK National Poisons Information Service case series documents real-world ibogaine toxicity presentations[31]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify case series scope from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveNoribogaine's prolonged half-life (28–48 hours) means cardiac risk extends well beyond the visionary phase — sudden death has been reported up to 72 hours after ibogaine ingestion.[10]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms sudden death and cardiac arrhythmias accumulating, but does not specify the 72-hour window or the 28–48 hour noribogaine half-life. These specific timing details would require the full review text.

life-threatening complications and sudden death cases accumulating.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveNoribogaine's prolonged half-life (28–48 hours) means cardiac risk extends well beyond the visionary phase — sudden death has been reported up to 72 hours after ibogaine ingestion.[19]model confidence 45%
Inconclusive

Abstract is specifically about hERG IC50 values and does not address noribogaine's half-life, ibogaine's half-life, or timing of sudden death post-administration.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedIn rats, ibogaine causes indirect (trans-synaptic) excitotoxic degeneration of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis via activation of the olivocerebellar projection[32]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly describes the mechanism: ibogaine activates inferior olivary neurons causing glutamate release at climbing fibers (indirect excitotoxic), confirmed by inferior olive ablation preventing Purkinje cell degeneration.

Inferior olive ablation prevents ibogaine-induced Purkinje cell degeneration. Ibogaine activates inferior olivary neurons causing glutamate release at climbing fibers — indirect excitotoxic mechanism.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedIn rats, ibogaine causes indirect (trans-synaptic) excitotoxic degeneration of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis via activation of the olivocerebellar projection[33]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms selective Purkinje cell degeneration in rat cerebellar vermis via sustained activation of inferior olivary neurons and excitotoxic climbing fiber glutamate — the olivocerebellar mechanism.

Both ibogaine and harmaline caused selective degeneration of Purkinje cells in rat cerebellar vermis. Mechanism: sustained activation of inferior olivary neurons leading to excitotoxic damage via climbing fiber glutamate.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedDose-response studies established 100 mg/kg (i.p.) as consistently neurotoxic and 25 mg/kg as the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL)[42]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms NOAEL at 25 mg/kg and Purkinje cell degeneration at 75–100 mg/kg in rats, supporting the stated dose thresholds.

Purkinje cell degeneration at 75-100 mg/kg (rats). NOAEL 25 mg/kg.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedAt 40 mg/kg — within the anti-addictive dose range in rodents — ibogaine did not cause Purkinje cell degeneration, suggesting that anti-addictive and neurotoxic properties may be dissociable at the dose level.[34]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 40 mg/kg (the anti-addictive dose) produced no Purkinje cell degeneration, while 100 mg/kg caused degeneration — directly supporting the claimed dose dissociation.

40 mg/kg ibogaine (anti-addictive dose) produced no Purkinje cell degeneration. High doses (100 mg/kg) caused degeneration in lateral/intermediate cerebellum.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIn humans, severe transient ataxia (inability to walk without support) was observed in all 14 patients in a clinical safety study[9]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms severe ataxia occurs in OUD patients treated with ibogaine but does not specify n=14, 'all patients,' or define it as 'inability to walk without support.' Those details are in the full results.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation, bradycardia, and severe ataxia.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveThe MISTIC cohort showed structural brain improvements (increased cortical thickness, decreased brain age) rather than deterioration at one month.[27]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify structural MRI findings from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveGC/MS analysis of 16 products found unknown substances in almost all samples, and one product labeled as "iboga" contained no detectable iboga alkaloids[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the adulteration and contaminant findings.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIndependent analytical verification by GC/MS or HPLC before clinical use is the only available risk mitigation for product quality.[12]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the analytical recommendation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveChallenging and dysphoric experiences are a documented component of the ibogaine experience, identified as one of seven empirically-derived factors ("Discomfort and challenge") in the Ibogaine Experience Scale (N=499). anxiety, fear, confrontation with difficult autobiographical material, and nausea-related distress are commonly reported during the acute phase.[8]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify IES factor structure, sample size, or dysphoric experience characterisation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveChallenging and dysphoric experiences are a documented component of the ibogaine experience, identified as one of seven empirically-derived factors ("Discomfort and challenge") in the Ibogaine Experience Scale (N=499). anxiety, fear, confrontation with difficult autobiographical material, and nausea-related distress are commonly reported during the acute phase.[35]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify dysphoric experience documentation from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIt is typically administered as a single dose in therapeutic contexts, and no published evidence documents dose escalation or tolerance development in humans.[36]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is a systematic review of ibogaine clinical trials but does not specifically address single-dose administration patterns or the absence of tolerance documentation.

Systematic review of ibogaine clinical trials and therapeutic applications.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIt is typically administered as a single dose in therapeutic contexts, and no published evidence documents dose escalation or tolerance development in humans.[22]model confidence 45%
Inconclusive

Abstract is about receptor binding mechanisms (kappa opioid, NMDA, serotonin), not clinical dosing patterns or tolerance documentation. Insufficient to verify the dosing claim.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveAnimal self-administration models do not show ibogaine self-administration, and no compulsive redosing patterns have been documented.[11]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract shows ibogaine reduced other-drug self-administration and found no CPP effect (relevant to abuse potential), but does not directly assess ibogaine self-administration or compulsive redosing of ibogaine itself.

ibogaine reduced drug self-administration (especially first 24h). No effect on CPP.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedIn a controlled human pharmacokinetic study, pretreatment with paroxetine (a potent cyp2d6 inhibitor) substantially elevated ibogaine AUC, with a strong correlation (r = 0.82) between CYP2D6 phenotype and ibogaine exposure[7]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms paroxetine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) doubles active moiety exposure and provides the exact correlation coefficient r=0.82 between CYP2D6 phenotype and ibogaine AUC.

Paroxetine doubles active moiety exposure. CYP2D6 phenotype correlated with ibogaine AUC r=0.82.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveCo-administration of ibogaine with any QT-prolonging agent — including methadone, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, certain SSRIs, and some antihistamines — compounds the hERG blockade effect and elevates risk of torsades de pointes.[10]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms QT prolongation and hERG mechanism coverage in this review, but does not specifically address drug-drug interactions with the listed agents or risk of torsades de pointes.

Covers QT prolongation, hERG, and 18-MC comparison.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveCo-administration of ibogaine with any QT-prolonging agent — including methadone, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, certain SSRIs, and some antihistamines — compounds the hERG blockade effect and elevates risk of torsades de pointes.[20]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the drug-interaction claim from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine may precipitate opioid withdrawal or attenuate withdrawal depending on the timing relative to last opioid dose[22]model confidence 50%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers receptor pharmacology relevant to withdrawal (kappa opioid, NMDA) but does not address the timing-dependent precipitation vs. attenuation of opioid withdrawal.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine may precipitate opioid withdrawal or attenuate withdrawal depending on the timing relative to last opioid dose[28]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms ibogaine attenuates opioid withdrawal symptoms (one side of the claim), but does not address precipitation or timing-dependence — the compound claim cannot be fully verified.

Ibogaine diminishes opioid withdrawal symptoms and drug cravings.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveDiscontinuation of medications for opioid use disorder (methadone, buprenorphine) for ibogaine treatment creates a dangerous scenario: incomplete tapering risks precipitated withdrawal, while loss of opioid tolerance after ibogaine treatment increases post-session overdose risk.[37]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the MOUD tapering risk claim.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIbogaine's serotonin-transporter inhibition creates a theoretical serotonin-syndrome risk when combined with MAOIs or serotonin releasers. No published clinical case report of ibogaine-induced serotonin syndrome was identified.[6]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify SERT-inhibition-based serotonin syndrome risk or case report absence.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedAny history of QT prolongation, cardiac arrhythmia, structural heart disease, or heart failure precludes ibogaine administration due to the established hERG blockade mechanism.[19]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract establishes the hERG blockade mechanism (IC50 values for ibogaine and noribogaine), providing the pharmacological basis for the cardiac-history contraindication.

hERG IC50: ibogaine (extraction) 3.53 µM, noribogaine 2.86 µM. Voltage-dependent low-affinity blockade.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedAny history of QT prolongation, cardiac arrhythmia, structural heart disease, or heart failure precludes ibogaine administration due to the established hERG blockade mechanism.[9]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms clinically significant QTc prolongation and bradycardia in OUD patients, directly supporting the contraindication rationale for patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions.

Ibogaine treatment of OUD patients induces clinically relevant but reversible QTc prolongation, bradycardia, and severe ataxia.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

verifiedIndividuals with reduced CYP2D6 activity experience approximately double the active moiety exposure, substantially increasing cardiac and neurological adverse event risk[7]model confidence 85%
Verified

Paroxetine (modeling CYP2D6 inhibition) doubling active moiety exposure directly supports the ~2× exposure claim for poor metabolizers. 'Genotyping recommended' implies increased risk warrants screening.

Paroxetine doubles active moiety exposure. Genotyping recommended before ibogaine treatment.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveIndividuals with reduced CYP2D6 activity experience approximately double the active moiety exposure, substantially increasing cardiac and neurological adverse event risk[20]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the CYP2D6 exposure-risk claim from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusivePersonal or family history of psychotic spectrum disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder) constitutes a relative contraindication due to risk of precipitated psychosis.[38]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify psychosis contraindication from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveActive opioid maintenance therapy without supervised tapering creates a dual risk: precipitated withdrawal during ibogaine treatment and post-treatment opioid overdose from reduced tolerance.[37]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify the dual MOUD risk claim.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

inconclusiveElectrolyte abnormalities — particularly hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia — potentiate QT prolongation and must be corrected before ibogaine administration.[38]model confidence 90%
Inconclusive

Abstract not available; cannot verify electrolyte management guidance from this citation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Jul 18, 2026

05

Coverage & Gaps

effect links
108 links · 108 approved · 0 audited0/108 with evidence basis
06

Research Trail

substance-article pipeline-v5 May 14, 2026

StepSourceQueryResults
1literature searchPubMedTabernanthe iboga alkaloids ibogaine pharmacology15 results, 10 selected
selection rationale

Selected papers most directly addressing ibogaine pharmacology, clinical use, safety, and effects. Discarded Tabernaemontana arborea alkaloid papers and unrelated bisindole studies.

2literature searchPubMedTabernanthe iboga ethnobotany traditional use Africa4 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Only PMID 8145572 is relevant as background on African Apocynaceae traditional uses. Main iboga ethnobotany requires targeted searches.

3literature searchOpenAlexTabernanthe iboga ibogaine15 results, 6 selected
selection rationale

Selected landmark citation-rich papers on ibogaine GDNF mechanism, neurotoxicity, pharmacokinetics, and foundational alkaloid chemistry. Discarded general psychedelic paradigm papers and unrelated substance P paper.

4literature searchPubMedibogaine cardiac toxicity QT prolongation fatalities5 results, 4 selected
selection rationale

All are highly relevant to safety section on cardiac toxicity. hERG blockade paper provides mechanistic data. NPIS paper provides UK case series.

5literature searchPubMedibogaine pharmacokinetics noribogaine CYP2D6 metabolism4 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

All selected for pharmacokinetics section. Glue 2015 is the only controlled human PK study at low dose with paroxetine inhibition paradigm.

6database lookupPubChemibogaine1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary alkaloid chemical identity confirmed.

7database lookupPubChemnoribogaine1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary metabolite chemical identity confirmed.

8literature searchPubMedibogaine neurotoxicity Purkinje cells cerebellar degeneration8 results, 5 selected
selection rationale

Core neurotoxicology papers establishing mechanisms and dose thresholds. Important for safety section.

9literature searchPubMedibogaine opioid addiction treatment clinical study12 results, 4 selected
selection rationale

Key clinical efficacy and safety studies selected.

10literature searchPubMedibogaine PTSD traumatic brain injury veterans Stanford3 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Both directly relevant to newer TBI/PTSD indications.

11legal status searchWebSearchibogaine legal status Schedule I DEA United States 2025 202610 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Legal status data from advocacy tracker and news sources.

12document retrievalWebFetch—1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary authoritative taxonomy source.

13database lookupPubChemtabernanthine1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Confirms tabernanthine chemical identity.

14database lookupPubChemibogamine1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Confirms ibogamine chemical identity.

15web searchWebSearchTabernanthe iboga IUCN conservation status endangered overcollection Gabon10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Conservation and legal harvest context.

16literature searchOpenAlexTabernanthe iboga ethnobotany Bwiti Africa traditional use10 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Critical alkaloid quantification data and Bwiti ethnobotany sources.

17document retrievalWebFetch—1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Comprehensive US state legal status data.

18literature searchPubMedibogaine (broad search)15 results, 10 selected
selection rationale

All highly relevant - neuroscience mechanisms, newer therapeutic applications, safety considerations.

19literature searchOpenAlexibogaine cardiac toxicity safety death fatalities8 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Added meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials.

20clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.govibogaine addiction opioid treatment2 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

All relevant clinical trials identified.

21literature searchPubMedibogaine detection urine plasma drug screening1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Only relevant detection paper found.

22cross referenceMultipleIbogaine dose ranges from clinical studies5 results, 4 selected
selection rationale

Dose data triangulated across multiple clinical sources.

23data extractionMultiple API sourcesIbogaine alkaloid profile, pharmacokinetics, mechanism synthesis20 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Core pharmacological data for research output.

24data extractionMultiple API sourcesLegal status and conservation synthesis10 results, 4 selected
selection rationale

Legal status section data.

25data extractionKnuijver et al. 2022QTc clinical data ibogaine safety1 result, 3 selected
selection rationale

Most comprehensive clinical safety data point.

Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: Tabernanthe iboga

---

## Botanical Identity

**Accepted binomial:** *Tabernanthe iboga* Baill.
**Family:** Apocynaceae (subfamily Rauvolfioideae)
**First publication:** Baillon, H. (1888). *Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Paris* 1: 783 [Ref 43].
**Common names:** iboga, eboka, ibogha (Bwiti tradition), ebogha

**Synonyms (7 total, from POWO) [Ref 43]:**
- *Iboga vateriana* Braun-Blanq. & K.Schum.
- *Tabernanthe albiflora* Stapf
- *Tabernanthe bocca* Stapf
- *Tabernanthe mannii* Stapf
- *Tabernanthe pubescens* Pichon
- *Tabernanthe subsessilis* Stapf
- *Tabernanthe tenuiflora* Stapf

**Native range [Ref 43]:** West and Central Tropical Africa to Angola. Specifically: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Angola, and Cabinda. Gabon is the primary source of commercially traded iboga material.

**Habitat:** Shrub or tree growing in wet tropical biome, typically forest understory; also found in riverine or swamp forest and relatively wet savannah; elevation 0–1,500 m above sea level [Ref 43].

**Cultivation status:** Primarily wild-harvested. Cultivation exists (Gabon permits cultivation on private land with Ministry permits) but wild harvesting predominates in the commercial supply. The IUCN Red List classifies *T. iboga* as Least Concern based on wide distribution, but overcollection for global ibogaine demand has depleted wild populations, particularly in Gabon [Ref 54]. In 2000, Gabon declared iboga a "national cultural heritage strategic reserve" and enacted an export ban on wild-harvested iboga in 2019 [Ref 54].

**Morphology:** Perennial shrub or small tree, 1.5–2 m tall (occasionally taller under forest canopy). Leaves are shiny, ovate-oblong, in whorls. Flowers small, white to light pink. Fruits are orange-yellow, ovoid, edible. The root and root bark contain the highest alkaloid concentrations; the alkaloid content decreases from root to stem bark, then leaves.

**Misidentification risk:** *Tabernanthe iboga* is the source plant for traditional Bwiti use and most commercial ibogaine extraction. *Voacanga africana* (also Apocynaceae) contains voacangine (a chemical precursor to ibogaine), and is a commercially available semi-synthetic ibogaine source. *Tabernaemontana* species (a closely related genus) contain iboga-type alkaloids including ibogaine and voacangine but at different ratios than *T. iboga* [Ref 5 — González-Trujano 2023, Ref 40 — Lopez-Vazquez 2026]. Misidentification of products sold as "iboga" as *Voacanga africana* or *Tabernaemontana* spp. has occurred [Ref 31].

**Discrepancies with brief seed data:** The brief contained no botanical seed data. All botanical data above is newly established through primary research. Family (Apocynaceae), genus/species, native range, and synonyms are now confirmed against POWO [Ref 43].

---

## Alkaloid / Cannabinoid Profile

### Primary Constituents

**1. Ibogaine** — the major psychoactive alkaloid. *T. iboga* root bark characteristically contains ibogaine as the most abundant psychoactive constituent.
- **PubChem CID:** 197060
- **Molecular formula:** C₂₀H₂₆N₂O; **MW:** 310.4 g/mol
- **Structure:** Pentacyclic monoterpene indole alkaloid (ibogane skeleton); 12-methoxyibogamine; an indolethylamine embedded in a cage-like pentacyclic framework
- **InChIKey:** HSIBGVUMFOSJPD-CFDPKNGZSA-N

**2. Noribogaine (12-hydroxyibogamine)** — the primary pharmacologically active metabolite of ibogaine, formed in vivo by CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation.
- **PubChem CID:** 3083548
- **Molecular formula:** C₁₉H₂₄N₂O; **MW:** 296.4 g/mol
- **InChIKey:** RAUCDOKTMDOIPF-RYRUWHOVSA-N
- Noribogaine has a longer half-life (~28–48h) than ibogaine, persistent serotonin reuptake inhibition, and kappa opioid agonism

**3. Tabernanthine** — structural isomer of ibogaine; differs in methoxy group position (C-6 vs C-7)
- **PubChem CID:** 6326116
- **Molecular formula:** C₂₀H₂₆N₂O; **MW:** 310.4 g/mol

**4. Ibogamine** — desmethoxy analog lacking the methoxy group
- **PubChem CID:** 100217
- **Molecular formula:** C₁₉H₂₄N₂; **MW:** 280.4 g/mol

**5. Voacangine** — also present in *T. iboga* root bark; a coronaridine carboxymethyl ester; used as a semi-synthetic ibogaine precursor; demonstrates hERG blockade IC₅₀ ~2.25 μM [Ref 16]

**6. Coronaridine** — biosynthetic precursor to ibogaine in the indole alkaloid pathway; CYP71 enzyme family catalyzes C19-hydroxylation of coronaridine [Ref 40]

**7. Ibogaline** (6-methoxytabernanthine) — minor alkaloid

### Quantified Concentrations

Bouso et al. (2020 [Ref 31]) conducted GC/MS analysis of 16 commercial iboga-derived products from treatment providers and online vendors. Findings:

| Product form | Ibogaine content |
|---|---|
| Root bark | 0.6–11.2% |
| Total Alkaloids (TA) | 8.2–32.9% |
| Purified Total Alkaloids HCl (PTA HCl) | 73.7% (single sample) |
| Ibogaine HCl | 61.5–73.4% |
| One sample (labeled as iboga) | No iboga alkaloids detected |

Additional alkaloids and unknown substances were found in almost all samples, including coronaridine, voacangine, ibogamine, tabernanthine, and ibogaline [Ref 31].

The 1958 foundational chemistry paper by Bartlett, Dickel, and Taylor [Ref 51] established the chemical structures of ibogamine, ibogaine, tabernanthine, and voacangine — the foundational structural pharmacognosy of the genus.

### Alkaloid Variability
Ibogaine content in root bark (0.6–11.2%) shows extreme variability that is likely related to geographic origin, plant age, plant part (root bark vs. stem bark vs. leaves), season, and post-harvest handling. This variability creates substantial overdose risk when dosing from uncharacterized root bark preparations [Ref 31].

### How Preparation Alters Constituent Ratios
- **Raw root bark:** Full alkaloid profile including non-ibogaine alkaloids (voacangine, coronaridine, tabernanthine, ibogamine). Highly variable ibogaine content. Traditional Bwiti use involves chewing raw root bark.
- **Total Alkaloid (TA) extract:** Concentrates all alkaloids; still contains full spectrum but at higher relative concentrations.
- **Purified Total Alkaloids / Ibogaine HCl:** Near-pure ibogaine; removes most co-alkaloids. Used in clinical research. This eliminates voacangine-related hERG contribution beyond ibogaine itself.
- **Aqueous decoctions:** Not commonly used for *T. iboga* (unlike *Mitragyna speciosa* or ayahuasca preparations); root bark is typically chewed or taken as powder.

### Minor Alkaloids
Tabernanthe species also contain small amounts of ibogaline (6-methoxytabernanthine) and related ibogane-skeleton compounds. Their in vivo contributions are not well-characterized at typical use concentrations. Literature on minor alkaloid effects is largely limited to in vitro receptor binding data.

### Biosynthesis Note
The biosynthetic pathway from strictosidine (shared with all monoterpene indole alkaloids) to iboga alkaloids has been substantially elucidated. CYP71 family enzymes (VCOH1-3) catalyze C19-hydroxylation of coronaridine and voacangine in related *Voacanga thouarsii* [Ref 40], indicating convergent enzyme solutions for iboga alkaloid production across Apocynaceae genera.

---

## History & Ethnobotany

### First Scientific Description
The species was formally described by Henri Ernest Baillon in 1888 [Ref 43]. The genus *Tabernanthe* was established by Baillon to accommodate this plant and related taxa within the family Apocynaceae.

### Traditional/Indigenous Use
*Tabernanthe iboga* is the sacramental plant of the **Bwiti religion**, practiced primarily by the Mitsogho and Fang peoples of Gabon and neighboring countries, with significant Babongo (hunter-gatherer) participation [Ref 32]. The Bwiti religion integrates ancestral veneration, initiation, and healing into a complex ceremonial structure in which iboga root bark is central.

Iboga is consumed in two primary traditional contexts [Ref 19, Ref 32]:
1. **Large initiation doses ("grand iboga"):** Eaten over 1–3 days in quantities described as several hundred grams of root bark, producing intense and prolonged visionary states lasting 24–48+ hours. These initiation rites are conducted for young adults entering the Bwiti tradition and are considered a symbolic death-and-rebirth experience enabling contact with ancestral spirits.
2. **Smaller ceremonial doses:** Taken in ceremonial settings for healing, guidance, or community ritual, without reaching the full visionary threshold.

The Babongo of southern Gabon have documented use of iboga in hunting and ceremonial contexts, with social and land-use patterns changing significantly since the 1960s [OpenAlex — Matsuura 2011].

Traditional medicinal uses at sub-visionary doses include: stimulant to combat fatigue and hunger during extended hunting; aphrodisiac; treatment of fever, pain, and parasitic infection [Ref 19, Ref 43 via POWO context].

**⚠ Flag for human review:** Traditional-use accounts are the primary evidence for ceremonial dose ranges, preparation methods, and phenomenological descriptions. No controlled ethnopharmacological studies with quantified dosing have been conducted in the traditional Bwiti setting.

### Western Discovery and Early Research
French colonial botanists and pharmacologists encountered iboga in the late 19th century. The first alkaloid isolation from *T. iboga* root bark — yielding what would eventually be named ibogaine — is attributed to **Landrin** (1898) and more fully to **Dybowsky and Landrin** (1901), working in the French colonial pharmacological tradition (cited in Alper 2001 review [Ref 28 context]; not independently verified via API). The plant itself had been documented in European herbaria from the 1850s–1880s exploratory period.

### 20th Century Pharmaceutical Interest
- **1930s–1950s:** Ibogaine was sold in France as a neuromuscular tonic under the brand name "Lambarene" (5 mg tablets); used as a fatigue remedy and mild stimulant [cited in Alper 2001; unverified via API].
- **1957:** Leo Zeff reportedly experienced ibogaine (unconfirmed in primary sources via API searches).
- **1962:** **Howard Lotsof**, a 19-year-old heroin-dependent American, self-administered ibogaine and reported that his opioid craving and withdrawal had ceased. He subsequently observed similar effects in multiple acquaintances [Ref 8].
- **1985–1986:** Lotsof obtained US patents for ibogaine treatment of multiple substance dependencies.
- **1967:** US DEA classified ibogaine as Schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act.
- **1990s:** NIDA initiated preclinical studies; Mash et al. began Phase I clinical trials at a St. Kitts clinic outside US jurisdiction [Ref 50, Ref 14].
- **2000:** Gabon declared iboga a "national cultural heritage strategic reserve" [Ref 54].
- **2019:** Gabon banned export of wild-harvested iboga [Ref 54].
- **2024:** Landmark MISTIC trial published in *Nature Medicine* for ibogaine in TBI/PTSD [Ref 28].
- **2026:** US executive order to accelerate ibogaine research and regulatory review [Ref 46].

---

## Neuroscience & Mechanism

### Primary Receptor Targets (Ibogaine)
Ibogaine exhibits exceptionally broad, multi-target ("matrix pharmacology") pharmacology [Ref 2]:

| Target | Action | Evidence level |
|---|---|---|
| VMAT2 (vesicular monoamine transporter 2) | Inhibitor; submicromolar IC₅₀ | In vitro, mouse brain [Ref 2] |
| SERT (serotonin transporter) | Inhibitor; transport inhibition in brain slices | In vitro/ex vivo [Ref 2] |
| OCT2 (organic cation transporter 2) | Inhibitor | In vitro [Ref 2] |
| α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor | Antagonist | In vitro [Ref 9] |
| NMDA receptor (PCP/channel site) | Antagonist; Ki(H) 0.01–0.05 μM cortex | Radioligand binding [Ref 27] |
| Kappa opioid receptor | Agonist | Animal models [Ref 26] |
| Sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors | Binding; Ki 1.5–3 μM | Radioligand binding [Ref 27] |
| Mu-opioid receptor | Biased partial agonist (low beta-arrestin recruitment) | In vitro [Ref 39] |
| 5-HT₂A receptor | Indirect effects; mediates some behavioral responses | 5-HT₂A KO mouse model [Ref 5] |
| GDNF pathway (VTA) | Upregulation; Ret receptor phosphorylation | Rodent in vivo [Ref 11] |

### Noribogaine-Specific Pharmacology
Noribogaine (the primary CYP2D6 metabolite) demonstrates:
- Submicromolar VMAT2 inhibition and partial serotonin release from synaptic vesicles [Ref 2]
- SERT inhibition in brain slice and rat synaptosome preparations [Ref 2]
- Kappa opioid receptor agonism contributing to anti-addictive effects [Ref 26]
- 5-HT₂A receptor-mediated sex-dependent effects on NMDA transmission in mPFC [Ref 5]
- Longer half-life than ibogaine (~28–48h vs ~7–10h); explains persistent effects and delayed cardiac risk

### CNS Mechanism Summary
Ibogaine's anti-addictive effects involve multiple converging mechanisms [Ref 26, Ref 36]:
1. **Acute dopamine suppression:** Ibogaine and noribogaine decrease extracellular dopamine in nucleus accumbens, acutely reducing drug reward reinforcement.
2. **GDNF upregulation in VTA:** Microinjection into VTA reduces ethanol self-administration, mimicked by exogenous GDNF [Ref 11].
3. **NMDA antagonism:** Attenuates opioid/stimulant withdrawal through glutamatergic normalization [Ref 26, Ref 27].
4. **Kappa opioid effects:** Contributes to effects on opioid and stimulant self-administration [Ref 26].
5. **VMAT2/SERT inhibition ("SynRI"):** Dual vesicular and plasma membrane serotonin transport modulation [Ref 2].
6. **Neuroplasticity/GDNF:** Structural brain changes observed in humans at 1 month post-treatment (increased cortical thickness, subcortical volume, decreased brain age) [Ref 33].
7. **Remyelination:** Proposed mechanism involving NMDA, kappa, and sigma receptor actions reducing excitotoxicity and promoting neuronal repair [Ref 36].

### Pharmacokinetics

**Ibogaine (oral administration):**
- Rapidly absorbed; Tmax ~1.5–4 h [Ref 15, Ref 20]
- Bioavailability: first-pass metabolism via CYP2D6 substantially converts ibogaine to noribogaine
- Elimination half-life: ~7–10 h in CYP2D6 normal metabolizers; significantly longer in poor metabolizers [Ref 15]
- Distribution: lipophilic; significant adipose sequestration with slow release (explains prolonged duration)
- **CYP2D6 is the primary metabolic enzyme:** O-demethylation to noribogaine. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers have 2× higher active moiety (ibogaine + noribogaine) exposure [Ref 15]
- Paroxetine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) pretreatment → ibogaine AUC substantially elevated; robust correlation (r = 0.82) between CYP2D6 phenotype and ibogaine AUC [Ref 15]

**Noribogaine (metabolite):**
- Formed primarily by CYP2D6; secondary pathway via CYP3A4
- Tmax ~3–4 h post-ibogaine administration [Ref 15]
- Half-life ~28–48 h — substantially longer than ibogaine
- Active pharmacologically (SERT inhibition, kappa opioid agonism, hERG blockade)
- Persistent noribogaine explains QTc prolongation observed 24–72h post-ibogaine administration [Ref 16, Ref 18]

**Glue et al. 2015 [Ref 15]** controlled human PK study (20 mg ibogaine, N=21):
- Normal metabolizers: rapid ibogaine-to-noribogaine conversion; noribogaine peak at median Tmax 4h
- Paroxetine-pretreated (CYP2D6 inhibition): ibogaine detectable to 72h, elimination half-life 10.2h
- 20 mg dose was safe and well-tolerated at this low exploratory dose

**Knuijver et al. 2024 [Ref 20]** PK/PD in OUD patients (10 mg/kg ibogaine HCl):
- Documented relationships between ibogaine/noribogaine PK and side effect magnitude and opioid withdrawal relief

---

## Effects & Dose by Preparation

**⚠ Note:** Published quantitative dose-response data for different preparation types is sparse. The data below combines clinical study doses, traditional use accounts, and pharmacological characterization. Dose values not verified against a Curiosity v1 DB record are flagged.

### Preparation 1: Ibogaine HCl (oral, therapeutic/clinical)

**Dose range:**
- Low exploratory dose (PK studies): 20 mg total (~0.2–0.3 mg/kg); no psychoactive effects [Ref 15]
- Anti-addictive / therapeutic range: **10–20 mg/kg** ibogaine HCl oral [Ref 21 — Knuijver 10 mg/kg; Ref 30 — Mash 2018 variable dosing in N=191]
- Higher doses reported in some addiction treatment settings: up to 25 mg/kg

**⚠ FLAG:** The 10–20 mg/kg dose range is derived from clinical study protocols (Knuijver 2022 used 10 mg/kg; Mash 2018 used variable doses for opioid withdrawal). No standardized dose-response data from controlled RCTs exist for therapeutic endpoint doses.

**Onset:** 1–3 h (oral, ibogaine HCl)
**Peak effects:** 3–8 h
**Duration total:** 12–24 h for acute phase; residual effects (insomnia, heightened senses) may persist 24–48 h

**Subjective effects (from González Espejito et al. 2025 [Ref 3], N=499):**

The Ibogaine Experience Scale (IES) identified 7 empirically-derived factors explaining 53.9% of variance:
1. **Narrative and symbolic visions** — story-like visual sequences, often autobiographical
2. **Visual changes** — altered visual perception, geometry, brightness, color
3. **Discomfort and challenge** — anxiety, fear, nausea, difficult material
4. **Cosmic/Archetypal Visions** — transpersonal content, entity contact, universal symbols
5. **Introspection and personal transformation** — insight, self-review, changed perspective
6. **Somatosensory hypersensitivity and physiological activation** — heightened tactile/auditory sensitivity, nausea, tremor
7. **Dissociation** — detachment from body and ordinary self-sense

**From Brown et al. 2019 [Ref 22] (N=44, States of Consciousness Questionnaire):**
- Mean SCQ scores in many domains exceeded 0.6 (threshold for "complete mystical experience")
- 43% achieved complete mystical experience in >5 of 7 domains
- Qualitative themes: cyclic visions, confronting autobiographical memories, guilt/release, spiritual transformation

**From Olash et al. 2026 [Ref 35] (N=30 veterans, qualitative post-session narratives):**
Four experiential domains:
1. Dialogic trauma re-appraisal (guided autobiographical memory replay)
2. Altered-self and mystical connectedness
3. Emotional resolution (forgiveness, love, renewed purpose)
4. Embodied healing (sensation of neural repair, cognitive clarity)

### Preparation 2: Root bark / Total alkaloid extract (oral, traditional/underground use)

**Dose range:** Highly variable; ibogaine content 0.6–11.2% in root bark [Ref 31], making milligram-equivalent dosing extremely unreliable.

**Traditional Bwiti initiation:** Several hundred grams of root bark reportedly consumed over 1–3 days in grand initiation ceremonies — but quantified alkaloid intake data from traditional ceremonies is absent from published literature.

**⚠ FLAG:** No published dose-response data with verified alkaloid content characterizes traditional or informal root bark use. Dose values from traditional use reports cannot be converted to ibogaine milligram equivalents without product analysis. This is a safety-critical gap.

**⚠ FLAG:** Commercial root bark and total alkaloid products show extreme concentration variability, including one sample with no detectable iboga alkaloids (Bouso et al. 2020 [Ref 31]). Adulteration and mislabeling represent serious overdose and under-dose risks.

### Preparation 3: Magnesium-ibogaine (MISTIC protocol)

Co-administration with magnesium has been investigated as a cardiac risk mitigation strategy [Ref 28].

**Setting:** Stanford MISTIC study (NCT04313712): 30 male special operations veterans with TBI.
- Complementary treatment modalities alongside magnesium-ibogaine protocol
- Specific doses not reported in the published paper [Ref 28]
- Significant improvements in WHO Disability Assessment (Cohen's d = 2.20 at 1 month), PTSD (d = 2.54), depression (d = 2.80), anxiety (d = 2.13)
- Cortical thickness increases in 11 brain regions; subcortical expansion in 8 regions; -1.3 year brain age at 1 month [Ref 33]
- No unexpected or serious adverse events reported [Ref 28]

### Effect Modifiers
- **CYP2D6 genotype:** Poor metabolizers have 2× active moiety exposure; higher cardiovascular risk [Ref 15, Ref 18]
- **Co-administered medications:** CYP2D6 inhibitors (SSRIs: paroxetine, fluoxetine) substantially increase ibogaine exposure [Ref 15]
- **Prior opioid maintenance:** Tapering from methadone/buprenorphine before ibogaine is dangerous if incompletely managed [Ref 37]
- **Set and setting:** Structured psychotherapeutic context appears to enhance therapeutic outcomes (Rocha et al. 2023 systematic review [Ref 7])

---

## Safety & Toxicity

### Acute Toxicity
**Rat LD50:** Not precisely established via API-verified sources. Animal toxicology studies in rats used single doses of 25–100 mg/kg (i.p.); 100 mg/kg caused consistent Purkinje cell degeneration; 25 mg/kg was the NOAEL [Ref 23]. No published mammalian LD50 for ibogaine was retrieved via structured database search.

**⚠ FLAG:** Human LD50 data do not exist. Rat cerebellar toxicity doses (75–100 mg/kg i.p.) likely exceed human therapeutic ranges, but the translation is uncertain given species differences and route of administration.

### Cardiac Toxicity (Primary Human Safety Concern)
Ibogaine and noribogaine block the hERG potassium channel (IKr), which is critical for cardiac repolarization [Ref 16].

**IC₅₀ values for hERG blockade (Alper et al. 2016 [Ref 16]):**
- Ibogaine (from *T. iboga* extraction): IC₅₀ = 3.53 μM
- Ibogaine (from voacangine semi-synthesis): IC₅₀ = 4.09 μM
- Noribogaine: IC₅₀ = 2.86 μM
- Voacangine: IC₅₀ = 2.25 μM
- 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC, experimental safer analog): IC₅₀ > 50 μM

**Clinical QT prolongation data (Knuijver et al. 2022 [Ref 21], N=14, 10 mg/kg ibogaine HCl):**
- Mean maximum QTc prolongation: 95 ms (range 29–146 ms)
- 50% of subjects reached QTc > 500 ms during observation
- In 6 of 14 subjects, QTc remained > 450 ms beyond 24 h post-administration
- No torsades de pointes (TdP) observed in this monitored clinical setting
- Severe transient ataxia (inability to walk without support) in **all** patients
- 11 of 14 did not return to morphine within 24 h (primary outcome)

**Fatal arrhythmias:** Reported deaths are attributed to TdP progressing to ventricular fibrillation [Ref 13, Ref 18]. The 10-year UK NPIS case series (Edwards et al. 2025 [Ref 4]) documents real-world ibogaine toxicity cases. Deaths primarily occur in unsupervised settings. Brunt (2026 [Ref 18]) notes cases occurring with therapeutic doses in individuals without pre-existing cardiac conditions.

**Timing of cardiac risk:** Noribogaine's prolonged half-life (~28–48h) means cardiac risk extends beyond the visionary phase — sudden death has been reported up to 72h after ibogaine ingestion [Ref 13, Ref 16].

### Neurological Toxicity
**In rodents:** Ibogaine causes indirect (trans-synaptic) excitotoxic degeneration of Purkinje cells in cerebellar vermis via olivocerebellar projection activation [Ref 12, Ref 25]. Established at 75–100 mg/kg (i.p.) in rats; NOAEL at 25 mg/kg [Ref 23].

Critically, at **40 mg/kg** (within or near the anti-addictive dose range in rodents), ibogaine did NOT cause Purkinje cell degeneration (Molinari et al. 1996 [Ref 24]). This dose-response separation suggests the anti-addictive and neurotoxic properties may be dissociable.

**In humans at therapeutic doses:** Severe transient ataxia is observed in clinical settings [Ref 21]. Long-term Purkinje cell effects in humans at therapeutic doses have not been established in published literature. The MISTIC study showed structural brain improvements, not deterioration [Ref 33].

### Psychological Risks
- Challenging / dysphoric experiences ("bad trips") are common and are captured as one of the 7 IES factors ("Discomfort and challenge") [Ref 3]
- Risk of acute psychological decompensation in individuals with pre-existing psychotic disorders (contraindication)
- Delirium-like states at high doses
- Hyperekplexia (exaggerated startle response) during residual phase

### Herb–Drug Interactions

**⚠ Note on evidence levels:** Mechanism-based CYP interactions are well-established pharmacokinetically; pharmacodynamic interactions are based on mechanism rather than clinical case reports.

| Interactant | Interaction | Evidence basis |
|---|---|---|
| CYP2D6 inhibitors (paroxetine, fluoxetine, bupropion) | ↑ Ibogaine AUC up to 2×; ↑ cardiac risk | Controlled human PK study [Ref 15] — **clinical case report basis confirmed** |
| QT-prolonging agents (methadone, TCAs, antipsychotics, SSRIs, antihistamines) | Additive QT prolongation → TdP risk | Pharmacodynamic mechanism [Ref 13, Ref 18] — **mechanism-based; clinical case reports not individually retrieved** |
| Opioids (acute coadministration) | Pharmacodynamic interaction; ibogaine may precipitate opioid withdrawal OR attenuate withdrawal depending on timing | Animal models [Ref 26]; clinical observations [Ref 30] |
| MOUD (methadone, buprenorphine) — withdrawal for ibogaine | Risk of precipitated severe withdrawal + post-ibogaine opioid overdose risk | Clinical editorial [Ref 37] — **mechanism-based; no controlled clinical trial data** |
| Serotonergic agents (MAOIs, serotonin releasers) | Potential serotonin syndrome via SERT inhibition | Mechanism-based — **no specific clinical case reports retrieved** |

**⚠ FLAG:** Herb–drug interaction severities above classified as mechanism-based are not individually backed by specific case reports retrieved through this research. Clinical supervision and medication review before ibogaine administration is essential.

### Tolerance and Dependence
- **Tolerance:** Not characterized by standard pharmacological tolerance. Ibogaine is typically administered as a single dose in therapeutic contexts. No published evidence of dose escalation or classic tolerance development in humans [Ref 48, Ref 26].
- **Dependence/withdrawal:** Ibogaine does not appear to produce physical dependence. No documented withdrawal syndrome in humans from ibogaine itself. The plant's traditional ceremonial use is intermittent, not daily.
- **Abuse liability:** Not considered a substance of abuse. Animal self-administration models do not show ibogaine self-administration; no compulsive-redosing patterns documented [Ref 47].

### Contaminant/Adulterant Risk
Based on Bouso et al. 2020 [Ref 31] analysis of 16 commercial products:
- One sample labeled as "iboga" contained no iboga alkaloids — **extreme adulteration risk**
- Unknown substances detected in almost all samples
- Wide ibogaine content variability (0.6–11.2% root bark) makes dose titration impossible from uncharacterized material
- No specific heavy metal, pesticide, or mycotoxin data retrieved for iboga products via API searches

**⚠ FLAG:** Heavy metal contamination, pesticide residues, and mycotoxin data for commercially sold iboga products are absent from the published literature retrieved. This parallels concerns for other botanicals and should be flagged as a safety gap.

### Contraindications and Vulnerable Populations
Based on safety literature [Ref 1, Ref 7, Ref 18, Ref 21]:
- **Cardiac disease:** Pre-existing QT prolongation, arrhythmias, heart failure — absolute contraindication
- **CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype:** Major risk factor; CYP2D6 genotyping recommended before treatment [Ref 15, Ref 18]
- **Concurrent QT-prolonging medications:** Must be discontinued with appropriate washout
- **Severe hepatic impairment:** CYP enzyme-mediated metabolism; impaired clearance
- **Personal or family history of psychiatric psychosis/schizophrenia:** Risk of precipitated psychosis
- **Pregnancy:** No published safety data; contraindicated by default
- **Opioid maintenance without tapering:** Dangerous discontinuation scenario [Ref 37]
- **Pediatric populations:** No safety or efficacy data

---

## Harm Reduction

### Published Risk Reduction Strategies (from systematic reviews [Ref 7, Ref 1]):
1. **Cardiac screening:** Pre-treatment ECG mandatory; QTc > 450 ms is a standard exclusion criterion
2. **CYP2D6 genotyping:** Recommended before any therapeutic ibogaine administration to identify poor metabolizers requiring dose reduction [Ref 15, Ref 18]
3. **Medication review and washout:** All QT-prolonging and CYP2D6-inhibiting medications must be reviewed and appropriately discontinued
4. **Cardiac monitoring:** Continuous ECG monitoring during and for minimum 24h after administration; defibrillator immediately available [Ref 7, Ref 21]
5. **Electrolyte management:** Hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia potentiate QT prolongation; pre-correction essential
6. **Magnesium co-administration:** MISTIC protocol used magnesium to potentially mitigate cardiac risk [Ref 28]
7. **Supervised setting only:** Medically supervised inpatient setting strongly recommended; death risk in unsupervised settings [Ref 7]
8. **Fall/ataxia prevention:** Severe ataxia occurs in nearly all patients [Ref 21]; immobilization or intensive physical support during experience
9. **Avoid in isolation:** NPIS case series emphasizes importance of trained supervision [Ref 4]

### Testing and Identification
- GC/MS or HPLC analysis of any iboga product before clinical use to determine actual alkaloid content [Ref 31]
- Standard immunoassay drug panels do NOT detect ibogaine [Ref 41]; dedicated LC-MS assay required for plasma/urine detection
- Drug checking services (harm reduction labs) can test root bark and extract products [Ref 31]

### Cessation and Recovery Resources
- No published ibogaine-specific addiction or dependence cessation literature (ibogaine itself is not typically dependence-forming)
- For individuals who experience adverse reactions: emergency cardiac intervention (defibrillation, magnesium sulfate IV for TdP), ICU-level monitoring
- MAPS and ICEERS have published harm reduction guidelines (referenced in Rocha et al. 2023 [Ref 7])

---

## Legal Status

### United States — Federal
**Schedule I** under the Controlled Substances Act since **1967**. No FDA approval. No accepted medical use recognized at federal level. Ibogaine HCl is also Schedule I [Ref 44, Ref 46].

### United States — State Level (as of May 2026 [Ref 44])
**Enacted bills (9 states):**
- **Texas** — SB 2308 (June 2025): $50 million allocated for ibogaine clinical research
- **Arizona** — HB 2871 (June 2025): $5M for Phase I clinical trials
- **Kentucky** — SB 77 (April 2026): $21M annually for SUD research
- **Louisiana** — SB 43 (May 2026): psychedelic-assisted therapy program (effective August 2026)
- **Mississippi** — HB 314 (March 2026): $5M for FDA approval consortium
- **Oklahoma** — HB 3834 (May 2026): clinical trial drug development framework
- **Indiana, California, Tennessee** — various research facilitation bills
- **Oregon** — HB 4110 (first US state to establish regulated ibogaine program)

**Active bills (9 states):** Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, West Virginia, and others

### United States — Recent Federal Developments
- **2026 US Executive Order:** Directs FDA and DEA to accelerate ibogaine research, fast-track clinical trials, and create pathways for Right to Try access [Ref 46, via Kozlov Nature 2026]
- **⚠ FLAG:** Legal status in US is rapidly evolving. Confirm current federal status with DEA scheduling database before publication.

### International
| Country/Region | Status |
|---|---|
| Mexico | Unscheduled; physician-supervised administration lawful; most international ibogaine clinics operate here |
| Brazil | Licensed clinics under ANVISA oversight |
| New Zealand | Class C controlled drug; prescription required |
| Netherlands | Therapeutic use permitted; no prohibition; several licensed clinics |
| South Africa | Medical supervision required; not prohibited |
| Costa Rica | Unregulated but openly practiced |
| United Kingdom | Not licensed; monitored by NPIS [Ref 4]; classified as a controlled substance |
| European Union | Varies by member state; generally not approved |
| Gabon | National heritage plant; wild harvest export banned (2019); cultivation permitted with Ministry approval [Ref 54] |

**⚠ FLAG:** Low confidence in exact EU member-state-level scheduling. UK status as controlled substance needs verification against current Misuse of Drugs Act schedules.

### International Treaties
Ibogaine is not listed in the schedules of the **1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs**, the **1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances**, or the **1988 UN Drug Convention**. Therefore, *Tabernanthe iboga* and ibogaine have no international treaty-mandated scheduling — national laws govern independently. This explains why countries like Mexico and Netherlands can permit ibogaine use legally.

---

## Clinical Trials

| NCT ID | Title | Status | Phase | Condition | Sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **NCT04313712** | MISTIC — Magnesium-Ibogaine for TBI/PTSD | Completed | N/A (observational) | TBI, PTSD, depression, anxiety | Stanford University |
| **NCT04003948** | Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of Ibogaine for Methadone Detoxification | Completed | Phase 2 | Drug Dependence, Opioid Dependence | ICEERS |
| **NCT06810765** | Trifecta Research Study | Withdrawn | Phase 2 | PTSD, Cognitive Dysfunction, TBI | Johns Hopkins University |

**Note:** Multiple additional ibogaine studies are underway or planned through MAPS, academic centers, and commercial sponsors following the 2025–2026 Texas appropriation and federal executive order. ClinicalTrials.gov search returned only 3 results; additional trials may be registered under related compound names (noribogaine, oxa-noribogaine, tabernanthalog).

---

## Community Feedback Analysis

**No community feedback submitted** in the brief's Part A2. No feedback items to assess.

---

## Gaps & Flags

### Safety-Critical Gaps
1. **⚠ Dose values not fully verified from published controlled RCT:** The 10–20 mg/kg therapeutic dose range derives from open-label observational studies and case series, not placebo-controlled trials. No standardized dose-response data confirmed.
2. **⚠ Traditional Bwiti doses:** Quantified alkaloid intake during Bwiti initiation ceremonies is absent from the published literature. "Hundreds of grams of root bark" is reported but unverifiable in mg-equivalent terms.
3. **⚠ Human LD50:** Not established. Rat NOAEL is 25 mg/kg (i.p.); anti-addictive doses in rats (40 mg/kg) are below the neurotoxic threshold. Human toxicity threshold is undefined.
4. **⚠ Herb–drug interaction case reports:** Many listed interactions are mechanism-based (CYP2D6, QT prolongation) rather than backed by individual clinical case reports. The CYP2D6 interaction (paroxetine study [Ref 15]) is clinical-trial confirmed. Others are extrapolated from mechanistic data.
5. **⚠ Serotonin syndrome risk:** No retrieved clinical case report of ibogaine-induced serotonin syndrome. Mechanism-based concern only.
6. **⚠ Heavy metals and contaminants:** No published analytical data on heavy metal (lead, cadmium), pesticide, or mycotoxin contamination of commercial iboga products.

### Data Absent from Published Literature
7. **Drug test detectability on standard panels:** Standard immunoassay panels do not detect ibogaine; confirmed via LC-MS methods [Ref 41]. No specific panel names or immunoassay cross-reactivity data found.
8. **Ibogamine, tabernanthine, and coronaridine pharmacodynamics in humans:** Largely uncharacterized; in vitro data only.
9. **Traditional-use-only evidence:** Sections on Bwiti ceremonial dosing, preparation methods, and phenomenological descriptions rely on ethnographic accounts without controlled pharmacological verification. **Flagged for human review.**
10. **Alkaloid content across cultivars and regions:** Quantified data on ibogaine variability by geographic origin, plant age, and part collected exists in commercial product analysis [Ref 31] but not from systematic botanical surveys of wild *T. iboga* populations.

### Unresolved/Needs Clarification
11. **UK legal status:** Needs verification against current Misuse of Drugs Act schedules. NPIS case series implies it is used (not licensed) in UK, but specific schedule placement unconfirmed via API.
12. **Lotsof's 1962 discovery:** Referenced in multiple secondary sources [Ref 8] but no primary documentation retrieved via API.
13. **1901 first alkaloid isolation (Landrin/Dybowsky):** Referenced in secondary literature [Alper 2001, Ref 28 context] but not directly verified via structured API search.
14. **Ibogaine's DEA scheduling as Schedule I in 1967:** Widely reported but not confirmed via DEA primary source in this research. Flag as moderate confidence — consistent across multiple sources.
15. **Interactions with specific MOUD:** The clinical risk when stopping methadone for ibogaine is real (Terasaki 2026 [Ref 37]) but quantified data (overdose incidence) are absent.
16. **Oneiric classification controversy:** Underwood et al. 2021 [OpenAlex] debates whether ibogaine experience should be classified as "oneirophrenic" vs. "holotropic." Traditional-use literature uses "oneirogen" as the classifier. Resolution depends on phenomenological criteria unavailable from structured PubMed/OpenAlex searches.