MXiPr
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 10–20 mg | 10–20 mg | low |
| Common | 20–40 mg | 20–40 mg | low |
| Strong | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | low |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus values carried forward. Oral dose ranges are identical to insufflated in seed data, which is unusual — oral bioavailability may differ due to first-pass metabolism, but no pharmacokinetic data exist to adjust ranges. Flagged for editorial review. Safety-critical: unverified against published sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus values carried forward. Oral dose ranges are identical to insufflated in seed data, which is unusual — oral bioavailability may differ due to first-pass metabolism, but no pharmacokinetic data exist to adjust ranges. Flagged for editorial review. Safety-critical: unverified against published sources. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
insufflatedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 10–20 mg | 10–20 mg | low |
| Common | 20–40 mg | 20–40 mg | low |
| Strong | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | low |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus values carried forward. No published controlled dose-response studies exist for MXiPr. All dose ranges are derived from anonymous community reports and harm reduction aggregators. Safety-critical: these values have not been verified against any published source. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus values carried forward. No published controlled dose-response studies exist for MXiPr. All dose ranges are derived from anonymous community reports and harm reduction aggregators. Safety-critical: these values have not been verified against any published source. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totaltrace | 1.5–4 hours | 1.5–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus values carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus values carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 2–5 minutes | 2–5 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus. Consistent with rapid nasal absorption of arylcyclohexylamines. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus. Consistent with rapid nasal absorption of arylcyclohexylamines. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 5–15 minutes | 5–15 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No existing data — estimated from class behavior and total duration. Work-notes propose 5–15 minutes based on arylcyclohexylamine class. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo existing data — estimated from class behavior and total duration. Work-notes propose 5–15 minutes based on arylcyclohexylamine class. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 30–90 minutes | 30–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No existing data — estimated from total duration (1.5–4 hours) minus onset and come-up. Work-notes propose 30–90 minutes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo existing data — estimated from total duration (1.5–4 hours) minus onset and come-up. Work-notes propose 30–90 minutes. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–12 hours | 2–12 hours | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus. Wide range reflects variability in body load persistence reported by users. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus. Wide range reflects variability in body load persistence reported by users. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 20–60 minutes | 20–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus. Consistent with gastrointestinal absorption and first-pass metabolism. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus. Consistent with gastrointestinal absorption and first-pass metabolism. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No existing data — estimated from class behavior. Work-notes flag this as requiring confidence=low. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo existing data — estimated from class behavior. Work-notes flag this as requiring confidence=low. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 60–150 minutes | 60–150 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No existing data — estimated from total duration (2–5 hours) and oral pharmacokinetics. Work-notes propose this range. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo existing data — estimated from total duration (2–5 hours) and oral pharmacokinetics. Work-notes propose this range. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Totaltrace | 2–5 hours | 2–5 hours | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus values carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus values carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 4–48 hours | 4–48 hours | low |
| Editorial | Existing DB / community consensus. Very wide range flagged for editorial review — work-notes note this is unusually broad and may reflect individual variability in MXiPr metabolism and the prolonged body load unique to this compound. | ||
ReasoningReasoningExisting DB / community consensus. Very wide range flagged for editorial review — work-notes note this is unusually broad and may reflect individual variability in MXiPr metabolism and the prolonged body load unique to this compound. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | low |
| Organs Affected | urological, cardiovascular, neurological | urological, cardiovascular, neurological | low |
| Editorial | All toxicity assessment derived from analog cases and class pharmacology — no MXiPr-specific data. Acute rated 'low' per work-notes (no single-substance fatalities, no organ damage at typical doses). Chronic rated 'moderate' per work-notes (class concern for uroepithelial toxicity from chronic ketamine/MXE use, cardiovascular strain, seizure risk from user reports). Evidence discount applied: entirely structural analogy from ketamine, MXE, 2-Oxo-PCE, and 2-FDCK. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll toxicity assessment derived from analog cases and class pharmacology — no MXiPr-specific data. Acute rated 'low' per work-notes (no single-substance fatalities, no organ damage at typical doses). Chronic rated 'moderate' per work-notes (class concern for uroepithelial toxicity from chronic ketamine/MXE use, cardiovascular strain, seizure risk from user reports). Evidence discount applied: entirely structural analogy from ketamine, MXE, 2-Oxo-PCE, and 2-FDCK. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | low | low | low |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | moderate | moderate | low |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | low |
| Editorial | All dependence parameters inferred from ketamine and MXE class data. No MXiPr-specific dependence studies exist. Physical dependence rated 'low' (work-notes specify low-to-moderate; downgraded given pure inference). Psychological dependence rated 'moderate' per work-notes due to euphoric afterglow and antidepressant-like class properties serving as reinforcement. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll dependence parameters inferred from ketamine and MXE class data. No MXiPr-specific dependence studies exist. Physical dependence rated 'low' (work-notes specify low-to-moderate; downgraded given pure inference). Psychological dependence rated 'moderate' per work-notes due to euphoric afterglow and antidepressant-like class properties serving as reinforcement. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | mild | mild | low |
| Symptoms | anxiety, dysphoria, craving, insomnia | anxiety, dysphoria, craving, insomnia | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | Withdrawal profile entirely inferred from ketamine class. No MXiPr-specific withdrawal data exist. Symptoms, onset, and duration estimated from ketamine/MXE withdrawal literature. Severity rated mild (work-notes specify mild-to-moderate). | ||
ReasoningReasoningWithdrawal profile entirely inferred from ketamine class. No MXiPr-specific withdrawal data exist. Symptoms, onset, and duration estimated from ketamine/MXE withdrawal literature. Severity rated mild (work-notes specify mild-to-moderate). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 10.5 days | 10.5 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | ketamine, MXE, DMXE, MXPr, DCK, PCP, DXM, nitrous oxide | ketamine, MXE, DMXE, MXPr, DCK, PCP, DXM, nitrous oxide | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus values from MXE class, not measured for MXiPr specifically. Work-notes specify moderate buildup, 5-day half-life, 1.5-week reset. Cross-tolerance list from work-notes covers all major NMDA antagonist dissociatives (Luethi & Liechti 2020). | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus values from MXE class, not measured for MXiPr specifically. Work-notes specify moderate buildup, 5-day half-life, 1.5-week reset. Cross-tolerance list from work-notes covers all major NMDA antagonist dissociatives (Luethi & Liechti 2020). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric Psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-established from ketamine/PCP research (Zanos et al. 2018). No MXiPr-specific data, but mechanism is well-characterized for all NMDA antagonists. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-established from ketamine/PCP research (Zanos et al. 2018). No MXiPr-specific data, but mechanism is well-characterized for all NMDA antagonists. | |||
| other Concurrent MAOI usetrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | SERT affinity inferred from MXE (Roth et al. 2013). Not confirmed for MXiPr but classified absolute due to severity of serotonin syndrome. Fatal analog case (Theofel 2019) involved venlafaxine co-administration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSERT affinity inferred from MXE (Roth et al. 2013). Not confirmed for MXiPr but classified absolute due to severity of serotonin syndrome. Fatal analog case (Theofel 2019) involved venlafaxine co-administration. | |||
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-established cardiovascular effects from ketamine research (Zanos et al. 2018). No MXiPr-specific cardiovascular data exist. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-established cardiovascular effects from ketamine research (Zanos et al. 2018). No MXiPr-specific cardiovascular data exist. | |||
| hepatic Hepatic impairmenttrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Substance-specific metabolic data from Frankenfeld et al. (2024) demonstrates extensive hepatic metabolism. Impaired clearance in liver disease is a pharmacokinetic inference with medium confidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSubstance-specific metabolic data from Frankenfeld et al. (2024) demonstrates extensive hepatic metabolism. Impaired clearance in liver disease is a pharmacokinetic inference with medium confidence. | |||
| renal Urological conditionstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-based concern from ketamine bladder toxicity literature. No MXiPr-specific uroepithelial data exist. Structural analogy inference from ketamine/MXE. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-based concern from ketamine bladder toxicity literature. No MXiPr-specific uroepithelial data exist. Structural analogy inference from ketamine/MXE. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | User reports of seizures at high doses combined with class-level seizure threshold effects of NMDA antagonists (Luethi & Liechti 2020). No published case reports confirm MXiPr-specific seizure risk. | ||
ReasoningReasoningUser reports of seizures at high doses combined with class-level seizure threshold effects of NMDA antagonists (Luethi & Liechti 2020). No published case reports confirm MXiPr-specific seizure risk. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancy and lactationtrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Theoretical risk based on NMDA receptor involvement in neurodevelopment. No reproductive data for MXiPr or close analogs. Class-level inference. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTheoretical risk based on NMDA receptor involvement in neurodevelopment. No reproductive data for MXiPr or close analogs. Class-level inference. | |||
| respiratory CNS depressant co-administrationtrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Analog case evidence from fatal arylcyclohexylamine polydrug cases (Theofel 2019, Riess 2024, Gicquel 2021). No MXiPr-specific interaction data, but mechanism is pharmacologically established. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAnalog case evidence from fatal arylcyclohexylamine polydrug cases (Theofel 2019, Riess 2024, Gicquel 2021). No MXiPr-specific interaction data, but mechanism is pharmacologically established. | |||
Timeline Phases
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 0–300 sec(i=0.15) | 0–300 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 300–900 sec(i=0.60) | 300–900 sec(i=0.60) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1800–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 1800–5400 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.50) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–43200 sec(i=0.20) | 7200–43200 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 2-5 min, total 1.5-4 hours, aftereffects 2-12 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior since no published phase-specific data exist for MXiPr. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1200–3600 sec(i=0.10) | 1200–3600 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 3600–9000 sec(i=1.00) | 3600–9000 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.45) | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.45) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 14400–172800 sec(i=0.15) | 14400–172800 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from work-notes and community consensus duration data (onset 20-60 min, total 2-5 hours, aftereffects 4-48 hours). Come-up and peak estimated from class behavior. The very wide afterglow range (4-48 hours) reflects the prolonged body load unique to MXiPr user reports. Afterglow advisory verbatim from work-notes. All values are community-derived, not from controlled studies. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
Perceptible onset of effects with subtle dissociation, mild bodily lightness, and a slight shift in mood. The experience is often compared to a mild nitrous oxide sensation — a gentle cognitive softening without significant impairment. Physical effects are minimal: faint tingling sensations may be noticed in the hands or head, and a light stimulating quality emerges. Analgesic effects are not yet apparent at this level. Cognitive function remains largely preserved. Threshold doses are primarily useful for assessing individual sensitivity to MXiPr before committing to higher doses, particularly given the absence of published dose-response data for this compound.
All dose tier descriptions derived from community consensus reports and structural analogy to MXE/ketamine. No controlled studies establish MXiPr dose-response relationships. Work-notes specify threshold tier characteristics.
ReasoningReasoning
All dose tier descriptions derived from community consensus reports and structural analogy to MXE/ketamine. No controlled studies establish MXiPr dose-response relationships. Work-notes specify threshold tier characteristics.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Noticeable stimulation and bodily lightness become the dominant physical features, with a sensation of weightlessness that users describe as characteristic of MXiPr. Tingling and spontaneous body sensations localize to the hands, feet, and head. Mild mood elevation and increased sociability emerge. Slight analgesic effects and pain suppression become apparent. Motor control remains functional but may feel subtly altered. The stimulating quality is more pronounced than at threshold, distinguishing MXiPr from the more sedating profile of ketamine at comparable dissociative depths. Dissociation remains subtle — a mild cognitive disconnection and perceptual softening rather than overt detachment. Cognitive function is only mildly impaired.
Community reports describe prominent stimulation and bodily lightness at light doses, positioning MXiPr as more stimulating than ketamine. No controlled dose-response data exist. Work-notes outline these features.
ReasoningReasoning
Community reports describe prominent stimulation and bodily lightness at light doses, positioning MXiPr as more stimulating than ketamine. No controlled dose-response data exist. Work-notes outline these features.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Moderate dissociation with clearer bodily disconnection from the external environment. The stimulating quality transitions toward a more balanced state as dissociative depth increases. Music enhancement becomes prominent, and visual drifting and perspective distortion emerge as perceptual features. Cognitive euphoria and conceptual thinking become apparent, alongside immersion enhancement. Time alteration is noticeable — subjective time perception may slow or become irregular. Motor control is noticeably impaired; walking and fine motor tasks require deliberate effort. Pain suppression is well-established at this tier. Touch suppression develops alongside the deepening dissociation. The characteristic warm, euphoric quality of MXiPr's afterglow typically begins to manifest during the offset phase at this dose level.
Common dose represents the typical recreational experience described in community reports. Effects profile drawn from work-notes and article prose. All values are community-derived with no controlled studies.
ReasoningReasoning
Common dose represents the typical recreational experience described in community reports. Effects profile drawn from work-notes and article prose. All values are community-derived with no controlled studies.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Pronounced dissociation approaching hole territory. Sedation overtakes the stimulating quality that characterizes lower doses, producing a warm, dreamy state. Internal hallucinations emerge — closed-eye visuals may include structured geometric patterns or immersive environmental scenes. Ego boundaries soften noticeably. Amnesia for portions of the experience becomes likely. Motor control impairment is significant — ambulation is difficult and potentially hazardous. Spatial disorientation is pronounced. Memory suppression and thought deceleration dominate the cognitive landscape. The body load may become more apparent at this tier, and aftereffects can extend significantly. The warm afterglow is typically intense and prolonged. Physical safety requires a controlled, seated or reclined environment.
Strong dose effects extrapolated from community reports describing hole-adjacent states and sedation takeover. Work-notes describe the stimulation-to-sedation transition and amnesia onset at strong doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Strong dose effects extrapolated from community reports describing hole-adjacent states and sedation takeover. Work-notes describe the stimulation-to-sedation transition and amnesia onset at strong doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Full dissociative hole — complete disconnection from the external environment with ego dissolution and immersion in internal hallucinatory landscapes. Awareness of the physical body and surroundings may be entirely absent. Depersonalization and derealization are total. Amnesia for the experience is likely. Significant body load is reported, with aftereffects potentially extending one to two days even from a single dose. Seizure risk, though rare, has been reported at these dose levels in community accounts. Cardiovascular strain from sympathomimetic effects is a concern. Recovery is prolonged compared to ketamine at equivalent dissociative depths. The extended afterglow may be accompanied by persistent body load, fatigue, and cognitive fog. This dose level carries the highest risk profile and should be approached with extreme caution given the complete absence of controlled safety data.
Heavy dose effects derived from community reports of full hole states and prolonged body load (up to 2 days). Work-notes flag seizure risk at high doses and extended recovery. No LD50 or controlled safety data exist.
ReasoningReasoning
Heavy dose effects derived from community reports of full hole states and prolonged body load (up to 2 days). Work-notes flag seizure risk at high doses and extended recovery. No LD50 or controlled safety data exist.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateDerivatives of methoxetamine and major methoxetamine metabolites potently block NMDA receptorsIrie T, Yanase Y, Demizu Y, Usami M, Kikura-Hanajiri R · 2022 · Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
- [2]moderateIdentification of Three Arylcyclohexylamines (MXPr, MXiPr, and DMXE) in Illegal ProductsTanaka R, Kawamura M, Mizutani S, Hakamatsuka T, Kikura-Hanajiri R · 2022 · Yakugaku Zasshi (Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan)
- [3]weak
- [4]moderate1,2-Diarylethylamine- and Ketamine-Based New Psychoactive SubstancesWallach J, Brandt SD · 2018 · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
- [5]moderatePhencyclidine-Based New Psychoactive SubstancesWallach J, Brandt SD · 2018 · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
- [6]strongKetamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic MechanismsZanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, Riggs LM, Highland JN · 2018 · Pharmacological Reviews
- [7]weakCommunity-aggregated experience reports on MXiPr subjective effects and dosage2024linkno claims checked
- [8]weakA Fatal Case Involving N-Ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE) and VenlafaxineTheofel N, Möller P, Vejmelka E, Kastner K, Roscher S, Scholtis S, Tsokos M · 2019 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [9]weak2-Fluorodeschloroketamine consumption: About two deaths and a case of self-mutilationRiess S, Chèze M, Muckensturm A, Klinger N, Roussel O, Cirimele V · 2024 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [10]strongDesigner drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effectsLuethi D, Liechti ME · 2020 · Archives of Toxicology
- [11]weakMXIPr - Methoxisopropamine Test Report (Druglab - Bus 31/32, Marseille)Druglab harm reduction service · 2024linkno claims checked
- [12]moderateEmerging new psychoactive ketamine analogues: patterns of use and health risks identified by the French Addictovigilance NetworkMezaache S, Pochard L, Peyriére H, Fouillhé Sam-Laï N, Micallef J · 2026 · The International Journal on Drug Policy
- [13]moderateChiral Separation and Determination of Enantiomer Elution Order of Novel Ketamine Derivatives Using CE-UV and HPLC-UV-ORDSeibert E, Hubner EM, Schmid MG · 2025 · Separationsdoi.org/10.3390/separations120200441 claim checked1 verified
- [14]moderateIn Vivo and In Vitro Metabolic Fate and Urinary Detectability of Five Deschloroketamine Derivatives Studied by Means of Hyphenated Mass SpectrometryFrankenfeld F, Wagmann L, Abelian A, Wallach J, Adejare A, Brandt SD, Meyer MR · 2024 · Metabolites
- [15]moderateThe ketamine analogue methoxetamine and 3- and 4-methoxy analogues of phencyclidine are high affinity and selective ligands for the glutamate NMDA receptorRoth BL, Gibbons S, Arunotayanun W, Huang XP, Setola V, Treble R, Iversen L · 2013 · PLoS ONE
- [16]moderateMethoxpropamine (MXPr) in powder, urine and hair samples: Analytical characterization and metabolite identification of a new threatGoncalves R, Castaing N, Richeval C, Ducint D, Titier K, Morvan E, Grelard A, Loquet A, Molimard M · 2022 · Forensic Science International
- [17]weakFatal intoxication related to two new arylcyclohexylamine derivatives (2F-DCK and 3-MeO-PCE)Gicquel T, Richeval C, Mesli V, Gish A, Hakim F, Pelletier R, Cornez R, Balgairies A, Allorge D, Gaulier JM · 2021 · Forensic Science International
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary10 claims9verified1not supported
verifiedIt inhibits NMDA receptor currents with an IC₅₀ of 0.661 µM in murine electrophysiology, placing its receptor-level potency between methoxetamine (MXE; IC₅₀ = 0.524 µM) and deoxymethoxetamine (DMXE; IC₅₀ = 0.679 µM)[1]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly provides all three IC₅₀ values confirming the claim verbatim: MXiPr = 0.661 µM, MXE = 0.524 µM, DMXE = 0.679 µM.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; DMXE = 0.679 µM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
not supportedMXiPr first appeared on research chemical markets in late 2020 and was formally identified by the National Forensic Laboratory of Slovenia in December of that year[2]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract describes identification of MXiPr in seized illegal products in Japan, with no mention of Slovenia or the National Forensic Laboratory of Slovenia. The cited paper cannot support the Slovenia attribution.
MXiPr (2-(isopropylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one) identified alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIt emerged as part of a wave of N-alkyl-substituted MXE analogs designed to circumvent the scheduling of MXE across multiple jurisdictions[4]model confidence 78%
The review covers historical context and design rationale for arylcyclohexylamine NPS analogs on illicit markets, which supports the claim about circumventing scheduling.
Historical context of arylcyclohexylamine analogs on illicit markets, pharmacology, and design rationale.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIt emerged as part of a wave of N-alkyl-substituted MXE analogs designed to circumvent the scheduling of MXE across multiple jurisdictions[5]model confidence 75%
Review covers arylcyclohexylamine class history including internet-era designer drug emergence, supporting the claim about analogs designed to circumvent scheduling.
arylcyclohexylamine class history from 1950s through internet-era designer drug emergence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedAs of 2026, only two peer-reviewed studies provide substance-specific data: one pharmacological characterization measuring NMDA IC₅₀ and one forensic identification report[1]model confidence 82%
This paper is the pharmacological characterization paper (one of the two referenced), directly providing the NMDA IC₅₀ measurement for MXiPr.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedAs of 2026, only two peer-reviewed studies provide substance-specific data: one pharmacological characterization measuring NMDA IC₅₀ and one forensic identification report[2]model confidence 82%
This paper is the forensic identification report (the second of two), identifying MXiPr in seized products with NMDA antagonism confirmed.
MXiPr (2-(isopropylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one) identified alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan. NMDA receptor antagonism confirmed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedAs an arylcyclohexylamine, MXiPr produces dissociation through open-channel blockade of NMDA receptors — the same mechanism underlying ketamine and PCP[6]model confidence 80%
Comprehensive ketamine pharmacology review covering NMDA receptor mechanisms. Open-channel NMDA antagonism is the canonical mechanism for the arylcyclohexylamine class, directly covered.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedNo LD₅₀ has been established, and no human fatalities attributed solely to MXiPr appear in published literature — though fatal cases involving structurally related arylcyclohexylamines have been reported, typically in polydrug contexts[8]model confidence 87%
Confirms a fatal case involving N-ethyldeschloroketamine (a structural analog of MXiPr) in combination with venlafaxine, directly demonstrating polydrug fatality in a related compound.
Fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE, a direct structural analog of MXiPr) combined with venlafaxine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedNo LD₅₀ has been established, and no human fatalities attributed solely to MXiPr appear in published literature — though fatal cases involving structurally related arylcyclohexylamines have been reported, typically in polydrug contexts[9]model confidence 87%
Confirms fatal cases (2 deaths) involving 2-FDCK, a structurally related arylcyclohexylamine, with DCK also detected as co-drug.
Forensic case series: 2 deaths and 1 self-mutilation involving 2-FDCK; DCK detected as co-drug.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedTolerance develops with repeated use and cross-generalizes within the NMDA antagonist class[10]model confidence 70%
Comprehensive review of designer drug adverse effects covers NMDA antagonists and dissociative NPS, which encompasses tolerance and cross-tolerance phenomena.
Comprehensive review of designer drug mechanisms and adverse effects. Covers NMDA antagonists, dissociative NPS, cardiovascular effects, psychological risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
history7 claims6verified1not supported
not supportedThe first formal laboratory identification was performed by the National Forensic Laboratory of Slovenia in December 2020.[2]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
Abstract describes identification of MXiPr in seized illegal products in Japan, with no mention of Slovenia. The paper cannot support the Slovenia attribution.
MXiPr (2-(isopropylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one) identified alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThis modification exemplifies a broader pattern in NPS design — minor N-alkyl substitution variations intended to circumvent generic scheduling definitions while preserving the pharmacological core of the parent compound[4]model confidence 80%
Review covers design rationale for arylcyclohexylamine NPS analogs, directly supporting the claim about minor structural modifications to circumvent scheduling.
Historical context of arylcyclohexylamine analogs on illicit markets, pharmacology, and design rationale.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThis modification exemplifies a broader pattern in NPS design — minor N-alkyl substitution variations intended to circumvent generic scheduling definitions while preserving the pharmacological core of the parent compound[5]model confidence 75%
PCP-class review covers arylcyclohexylamine history through internet-era designer drug emergence, supporting the claim about structural variation patterns to circumvent scheduling.
arylcyclohexylamine class history from 1950s through internet-era designer drug emergence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedTanaka et al. (2022) reported the identification of MXiPr alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan, representing the first published forensic identification of the compound[2]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms identification of MXiPr alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan.
MXiPr (2-(isopropylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one) identified alongside MXPr and DMXE in seized illegal products in Japan.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIrie et al. (2022), from the same research group at the National Institute of Health Sciences (Japan), subsequently published the first — and, as of 2026, only — pharmacological characterization, measuring NMDA receptor IC₅₀ via patch-clamp electrophysiology[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms patch-clamp electrophysiology NMDA IC₅₀ measurement for MXiPr. Institutional affiliation (NIHS Japan) and 'same research group' not verifiable from abstract alone, but the pharmacological characterization is directly confirmed.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe authors explicitly identified MXiPr and DMXE as 'serious concerns' given their potent NMDAR blockade and online availability since 2020.[1]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms MXiPr and DMXE sold online since 2020 with potent NMDAR blockade documented. The 'serious concerns' framing is a reasonable inference from the paper's purpose and content as reflected in the abstract.
MXiPr and DMXE sold online as designer drugs since 2020.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe French Addictovigilance Network has flagged MXiPr in the context of emerging ketamine analogue use patterns[12]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms characterization of use patterns for emerging ketamine analogues including MXiPr class reported to the French Addictovigilance Network.
Characterizes patterns of use, user profiles, and associated health outcomes for emerging ketamine analogues (including MXiPr class) reported to the French Addictovigilance Network.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
chemistry3 claims3verified
verifiedFrankenfeld et al. (2024) designate MXiPr as 'deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine,' placing it within the deschloroketamine derivative series[14]model confidence 98%
Abstract uses the exact term 'deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr)' confirming this nomenclature and placement within the DCK derivative series.
Phase I/II metabolism of 5 DCK derivatives including deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSeibert et al. (2025) developed enantioseparation methods for 11 ketamine derivatives including MXiPr, using capillary electrophoresis with UV detection (CE-UV) and HPLC-UV with optical rotation detection[13]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms chiral separation methods (CE and HPLC) on 11 ketamine derivatives including MXiPr. CE-UV and HPLC with ORD methods are confirmed.
Chiral separation methods (CE and HPLC) tested on 11 ketamine derivatives including MXiPr.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedFor reference, S-ketamine is approximately twice as potent as R-ketamine at NMDA receptors; whether MXiPr exhibits comparable enantioselectivity is unknown.[6]model confidence 70%
Stereochemistry is explicitly listed in the scope of this comprehensive ketamine pharmacology review, which makes the S/R potency ratio a natural inclusion. The abstract's coverage of stereochemistry supports this claim.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
pharmacology9 claims7verified2inconclusive
verifiedMXiPr acts primarily as an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist — it blocks the ion channel pore of the NMDA receptor in an open-channel, use-dependent manner, the same mechanism established for ketamine, PCP, and MXE.[6]model confidence 82%
Comprehensive ketamine pharmacology review directly covers the uncompetitive, open-channel NMDA antagonism mechanism that is the defining feature of the arylcyclohexylamine class.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedMXiPr acts primarily as an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist — it blocks the ion channel pore of the NMDA receptor in an open-channel, use-dependent manner, the same mechanism established for ketamine, PCP, and MXE.[4]model confidence 75%
Review of dissociative NPS covering MXE and DCK analogs with pharmacology explicitly in scope, confirming NMDA antagonism as the class mechanism.
Review of dissociative NPS including beta-keto-arylcyclohexylamines (MXE, DCK, 2-FDCK). Historical context of arylcyclohexylamine analogs on illicit markets, pharmacology, and design rationale.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIrie et al. (2022) determined the IC₅₀ of MXiPr at NMDA receptors to be 0.661 µM using patch-clamp electrophysiology in NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons of mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus[1]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms IC₅₀ = 0.661 µM, patch-clamp methodology, and NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons in mice.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedMXE and related β-keto-arylcyclohexylamines demonstrate sigma receptor affinity, but no published binding study has evaluated MXiPr at sigma receptors[15]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms sigma receptor affinity for PCP analogues (related class). The paper tests MXE/PCP analogues but not MXiPr, consistent with the claim that MXiPr has not been evaluated.
PCP analogues exhibited high affinities for sigma receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSimilarly, Roth et al. (2013) demonstrated that MXE possesses affinity for the serotonin transporter (SERT)[15]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly states 'MXE and PCP analogues showed appreciable affinities for serotonin transporter.'
MXE and PCP analogues showed appreciable affinities for serotonin transporter.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedFrankenfeld et al. (2024) conducted the most detailed published study of MXiPr metabolism, examining five deschloroketamine derivatives in male Wistar rats (in vivo, urine collected over 24 hours at 2 mg/kg body weight) and pooled human liver microsomes (in vitro)[14]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms: 5 DCK derivatives including MXiPr, rats (in vivo), pooled human liver microsomes (in vitro). Specific methodological details (Wistar strain, 24h, 2mg/kg) are not in the abstract but are not contradicted.
Phase I/II metabolism of 5 DCK derivatives including deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr) in rats and pooled human liver microsomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveCompound-specific metabolites were identified by LC-HRMS/MS, enabling targeted urinary detection of MXiPr use; GC-MS screening detected only non-specific acetylated N-dealkylation metabolites[14]model confidence 58%
Abstract confirms the study uses hyphenated mass spectrometry and identifies N-dealkylation and N-acetylation metabolites, but the specific comparison between LC-HRMS/MS compound-specific detection and GC-MS non-specific detection is not described in the abstract.
Main pathways: N-dealkylation, hydroxylation, multiple oxidations, glucuronidation, N-acetylation. 29 phase I and 10 phase II metabolites detected.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe analogous metabolism of the N-propyl congener MXPr includes N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, and dihydroMXPr.[16]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly lists the exact metabolites: N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, dihydroMXPr.
Metabolites: N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, dihydroMXPr.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveArylcyclohexylamines are generally metabolized via CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, as established for ketamine[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract covers ketamine pharmacology and metabolites but does not specifically mention CYP2B6 or CYP3A4 isoforms. The specific CYP enzyme attribution requires data from the full text.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
neuroscience4 claims2verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveThe glutamate hypothesis of psychosis, originally developed to explain schizophrenia, provides additional mechanistic context: NMDA antagonists reproduce positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions), negative symptoms (emotional flattening, withdrawal), and cognitive symptoms (working memory impairment) observed in psychotic disorders, more faithfully than dopaminergic models[6]model confidence 52%
The abstract covers ketamine pharmacology and therapeutic mechanisms but does not specifically address the glutamate hypothesis of psychosis or comparison with dopaminergic models of schizophrenia. This specific claim would require detail not present in the abstract.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedKetamine studies demonstrate that NMDA antagonism preferentially affects GABAergic cortical interneurons, producing a paradoxical increase in glutamate release in prefrontal regions — the 'glutamate surge' — that is thought to underlie both the acute psychotomimetic effects and the delayed antidepressant response[6]model confidence 68%
The abstract explicitly covers antidepressant mechanisms for ketamine, and the GABAergic interneuron disinhibition / glutamate surge is the leading mechanistic model for ketamine's antidepressant effects — a core topic in any comprehensive review of this scope.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe rapid synaptogenesis observed following ketamine administration (mediated by AMPA receptor potentiation → BDNF release → mTOR pathway activation) represents the leading mechanistic hypothesis for ketamine's antidepressant effects[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract covers antidepressant mechanisms broadly but does not specifically mention AMPA potentiation, BDNF release, or mTOR pathway activation. These specific downstream mechanistic details require the full text to verify.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedWhat is the contribution of MXiPr's metabolites to its overall pharmacological and neurological profile? The O-desmethyl metabolite of MXE is 2.3× more potent at NMDA receptors — does an analogous metabolite of MXiPr contribute to or extend its effects?[1]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms O-desmethyl MXE IC₅₀ = 0.227 µM vs MXE 0.524 µM, yielding the 2.3× potency ratio cited in the claim.
O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; MXiPr = 0.661 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
receptor pharmacology4 claims3verified1partial
verifiedThe sole published pharmacological measurement for MXiPr is an IC₅₀ of 0.661 µM at NMDA receptors, determined by Irie et al. (2022) using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in cartwheel interneurons of the mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus[1]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms IC₅₀ = 0.661 µM, patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice — all key methodological details confirmed.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe following IC₅₀ values were measured under identical conditions by Irie et al. (2022):[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract provides all IC₅₀ values (MXiPr, MXE, DMXE, N-desethyl MXE, O-desmethyl MXE) measured by the same patch-clamp method in the same preparation.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; DMXE = 0.679 µM; N-desethyl MXE = 1.649 µM; O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialSigma-1 receptor: MXE and related β-keto-arylcyclohexylamines demonstrate sigma receptor affinity. Whether MXiPr acts as a sigma-1 agonist has not been tested.[15]model confidence 68%
Abstract attributes sigma receptor affinity specifically to 'PCP analogues,' not MXE. The claim states 'MXE and related β-keto-arylcyclohexylamines demonstrate sigma receptor affinity' but the abstract shows sigma affinity for PCP analogues while MXE specifically shows SERT affinity. This is a material misattribution.
MXE and PCP analogues showed appreciable affinities for serotonin transporter; PCP analogues exhibited high affinities for sigma receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSerotonin transporter (SERT): MXE possesses SERT affinity. The N-isopropyl substitution may alter SERT binding relative to the N-ethyl parent, but no data exist.[15]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms MXE SERT affinity. The caveat about N-isopropyl substitution effects is appropriate uncertainty.
MXE and PCP analogues showed appreciable affinities for serotonin transporter.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail6 claims4verified2inconclusive
verifiedFrankenfeld et al. (2024) conducted the most detailed published metabolic study of MXiPr, examining five deschloroketamine derivatives in male Wistar rats (in vivo, urine collected over 24 hours following administration at 2 mg/kg body weight) and pooled human liver microsomes (in vitro)[14]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms 5 DCK derivatives including MXiPr studied in rats and pooled human liver microsomes. Specific methodological details (Wistar, 24h, 2mg/kg) not in abstract but not contradicted.
Phase I/II metabolism of 5 DCK derivatives including deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr) in rats and pooled human liver microsomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveGC-MS screening, by contrast, detected only non-specific acetylated N-dealkylation metabolites common to multiple deschloroketamine derivatives, limiting its utility for identifying MXiPr specifically.[14]model confidence 55%
Abstract confirms N-dealkylation and N-acetylation as metabolic pathways, but the specific statement about GC-MS detecting only non-specific metabolites (versus LC-HRMS/MS compound-specific detection) is not described in the abstract. This level of analytical detail requires the full text.
Main pathways: N-dealkylation, hydroxylation, multiple oxidations, glucuronidation, N-acetylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedFor comparative context, the analogous metabolism of MXPr (the N-propyl congener) includes N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, and dihydroMXPr[16]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly lists all three metabolites: N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, and dihydroMXPr.
Metabolites: N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, dihydroMXPr.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe O-desmethyl metabolite is of particular pharmacological interest: O-desmethyl MXE is the most potent NMDA antagonist in the MXE derivative series tested by Irie et al. (2022), with an IC₅₀ of 0.227 µM — approximately 2.3-fold more potent than MXE and 2.9-fold more potent than MXiPr[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly provides the values: O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM, MXE = 0.524 µM, MXiPr = 0.661 µM. Math checks out: 0.524/0.227 ≈ 2.31×, 0.661/0.227 ≈ 2.91×.
O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; MXiPr = 0.661 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveArylcyclohexylamines are generally metabolized via CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, as established for ketamine[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract covers ketamine pharmacology including metabolites but does not specifically mention CYP2B6 or CYP3A4. This specific CYP attribution cannot be confirmed from the abstract.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedUrinary excretion of MXiPr metabolites has been demonstrated in rats, with metabolites detectable in 24-hour urine collections[14]model confidence 87%
Abstract confirms in vivo urinary detectability of MXiPr metabolites in rats (study title includes 'Urinary Detectability'; abstract confirms in vivo rat study).
Phase I/II metabolism of 5 DCK derivatives including deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr) in rats... 29 phase I and 10 phase II metabolites detected.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
clinical evidence1 claim1verified
verifiedThe broader arylcyclohexylamine class does include clinically developed compounds: ketamine has extensive clinical use as an anesthetic and is approved (as the S-enantiomer, esketamine) for treatment-resistant depression[6]model confidence 82%
Abstract covers ketamine pharmacology including antidepressant mechanisms and stereochemistry, supporting the clinical context for ketamine/esketamine use.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
comparative pharmacology2 claims2verified
verifiedAll values from Irie et al. (2022).[1]model confidence 95%
All IC₅₀ values referenced are sourced from this single paper.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; DMXE = 0.679 µM; N-desethyl MXE = 1.649 µM; O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe only direct pharmacological comparison available for MXiPr derives from Irie et al. (2022), who measured NMDA receptor IC₅₀ values for MXiPr and four structurally related MXE derivatives under identical assay conditions (patch-clamp electrophysiology, mouse cartwheel interneurons).[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms IC₅₀ values for MXiPr plus four others (MXE, DMXE, N-desethyl MXE, O-desmethyl MXE) all measured by the same patch-clamp method.
IC50 values at NMDA receptors (patch-clamp, NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons, mice): MXiPr = 0.661 µM; MXE = 0.524 µM; DMXE = 0.679 µM; N-desethyl MXE = 1.649 µM; O-desmethyl MXE = 0.227 µM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
safety14 claims9verified2partial3inconclusive
verifiedN-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE): One fatal case reported by Theofel et al. (2019), with femoral blood concentration of 375 µg/L. The decedent had co-administered venlafaxine (SNRI).[8]model confidence 97%
Abstract exactly confirms: femoral blood 375 µg/L and venlafaxine co-administration in this fatal case.
Fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE, a direct structural analog of MXiPr) combined with venlafaxine. Concentrations: femoral blood 375 µg/L.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partial2-Fluorodeschloroketamine (2-FDCK): Two fatal cases reported by Riess et al. (2024), with blood concentrations of 758 and 5,885 µg/L.[9]model confidence 62%
Abstract confirms two deaths involving 2-FDCK and an upper range of 5,885 µg/L, consistent with the claim. However, the abstract states the overall blood concentration range is 457–5,885 µg/L (including self-mutilation case), and the specific per-death value of 758 µg/L is not confirmed. The lower bound 457 µg/L does not match the claimed 758 µg/L.
Forensic case series: 2 deaths and 1 self-mutilation involving 2-FDCK; blood concentrations 457-5885 µg/L.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verified2F-DCK and 3-MeO-PCE combination: One fatal intoxication reported by Gicquel et al. (2021).[17]model confidence 97%
Abstract exactly confirms a fatal intoxication involving 2F-DCK and 3-MeO-PCE.
Fatal intoxication involving 2F-DCK and 3-MeO-PCE, both arylcyclohexylamine NPS.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveNMDA antagonists including ketamine produce dose-dependent sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects — tachycardia and hypertension — via central sympathetic stimulation[6]model confidence 52%
The abstract covers ketamine pharmacology at multiple receptors but does not specifically mention cardiovascular effects, tachycardia, or hypertension. These details would require the full text.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedNo case reports in published literature confirm this for MXiPr specifically, though NMDA antagonists as a class can affect seizure threshold.[10]model confidence 72%
Review explicitly covers adverse effects for NMDA antagonists and dissociative NPS, which encompasses seizure threshold effects at the class level.
Comprehensive review of designer drug mechanisms and adverse effects. Covers NMDA antagonists, dissociative NPS, cardiovascular effects, psychological risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedAcute psychological distress: Anxiety, paranoia, and confusion during the acute phase, particularly at higher doses or in unfamiliar settings.[10]model confidence 75%
Review explicitly covers psychological risks for NMDA antagonist/dissociative NPS, which directly encompasses acute anxiety, paranoia, and confusion.
Comprehensive review of designer drug mechanisms and adverse effects. Covers NMDA antagonists, dissociative NPS, cardiovascular effects, psychological risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusivePsychosis precipitation: NMDA antagonists can precipitate psychotic episodes in vulnerable individuals. The glutamate hypothesis of psychosis identifies NMDA hypofunction as a potential mechanism for both substance-induced and endogenous psychotic states.[6]model confidence 52%
The abstract covers ketamine pharmacology and antidepressant mechanisms but does not specifically address psychosis precipitation or the glutamate hypothesis of psychosis. These specific details are not confirmable from the abstract alone.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSelf-medication risk: The antidepressant-like properties observed for ketamine and MXE may attract self-medication use, creating patterns of escalating frequency.[6]model confidence 75%
Abstract explicitly covers antidepressant mechanisms for ketamine, directly supporting the premise that antidepressant-like properties could motivate self-medication.
Comprehensive review of ketamine pharmacology at NMDA, opioid, sigma, and other receptors. Covers antidepressant mechanisms, metabolites, stereochemistry.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveCommunity-derived estimates place the functional tolerance half-life at approximately 5 days with full reset at 1.5 weeks. Cross-tolerance within the dissociative class (all NMDA antagonists) is expected.[10]model confidence 50%
The review covers adverse effects for NMDA antagonists and dissociative NPS broadly, but the specific community-derived tolerance timeline (5 days / 1.5 weeks) is not confirmable from a peer-reviewed abstract. Cross-tolerance as a class expectation may be covered but is not explicitly stated in the abstract.
Comprehensive review of designer drug mechanisms and adverse effects. Covers NMDA antagonists, dissociative NPS, cardiovascular effects, psychological risks, detection challenges.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialThe fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine reported by Theofel et al. (2019) involved co-presence of morphine, oxycodone, and other compounds, illustrating the danger of polydrug use in this class.[8]model confidence 70%
The abstract confirms a polydrug fatality (2-Oxo-PCE + venlafaxine + DCK in urine). However, the claim specifies morphine and oxycodone as co-present drugs, which are not mentioned in the abstract. The abstract only identifies venlafaxine (SNRI) and DCK. The specific opioids named in the claim are not supported.
Fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE) combined with venlafaxine. Concentrations: femoral blood 375 µg/L, liver 6137 ng/g. DCK also detected in urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSerotonergic agent combinations carry potential risk if MXiPr shares the SERT affinity demonstrated for MXE[15]model confidence 87%
Abstract confirms MXE possesses SERT affinity, which directly supports the conditional risk claim for serotonergic combinations.
MXE and PCP analogues showed appreciable affinities for serotonin transporter.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe fatal case reported by Theofel et al. (2019) involved co-administration with venlafaxine (SNRI), though the specific contribution of serotonergic interaction to the fatality was not established.[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms venlafaxine (SNRI) co-administration in this fatal case.
Fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE, a direct structural analog of MXiPr) combined with venlafaxine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedHepatic impairment: MXiPr undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism. Impaired hepatic function may prolong drug exposure and increase toxicity risk.[14]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms extensive hepatic metabolism via multiple Phase I and II pathways (N-dealkylation, hydroxylation, glucuronidation, etc.), directly supporting the hepatic impairment risk inference.
Phase I/II metabolism of 5 DCK derivatives including deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine (MXiPr) in rats and pooled human liver microsomes. Main pathways: N-dealkylation, hydroxylation, multiple oxidations, glucuronidation, N-acetylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedSeizure disorders: User reports of seizures at high doses and the class-level seizure threshold effects of NMDA antagonists indicate increased risk for individuals with epilepsy or lowered seizure threshold.[10]model confidence 70%
Review covers adverse effects of NMDA antagonists and dissociative NPS, which encompasses seizure risk at the class level.
Comprehensive review of designer drug mechanisms and adverse effects. Covers NMDA antagonists, dissociative NPS, cardiovascular effects, psychological risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 9, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | MXiPr | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 2database lookup | PubChem | methoxisopropamine | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 3literature search | PubMed | MXiPr dissociative arylcyclohexylamine | 0 results |
| 4literature search | PubMed | deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine metabolism deschloroketamine derivative | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 5literature search | OpenAlex | MXiPr dissociative research chemical arylcyclohexylamine | 2 results, 2 selected |
| 6literature search | PubMed | deschloroketamine new psychoactive substance toxicology case report | 2 results, 2 selected |
| 7literature search | OpenAlex | deschloroketamine derivatives new psychoactive substance pharmacology | 10 results, 4 selected |
| 8literature search | OpenAlex | methoxetamine pharmacology binding affinity NMDA sigma receptor | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 9literature search | PubMed | MXPr MXiPr DMXE arylcyclohexylamine identification illegal | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 10literature search | PubMed | Irie Yanase Demizu Usami Kikura-Hanajiri methoxetamine NMDA 2022 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 11literature search | PubMed | ketamine analog dissociative drug harm reduction adverse effects clinical toxicology emergency | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 12web search | Web (KnowDrugs) | MXiPr test report drug checking service | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 13legal status search | Web (multiple) | MXiPr methoxisopropamine legal status scheduling | 5 results, 2 selected |
| 14document retrieval | HandWiki | methoxisopropamine MXiPr chemical data legal status | 1 result, 2 selected |
| 15document retrieval | CFSRE | DMXE deoxymethoxetamine related to MXiPr | 1 result, 2 selected |
| 16web search | Web | MXiPr dose effects experience research chemical 2021-2024 | 5 results, 1 selected |
| 17clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | MXiPr dissociative | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: MXiPr (Methoxisopropamine) **PSX ID:** PSX-0268 **Research Date:** 2026-05-09 **Substance Readiness:** Sparse/Emerging (< 0.3) — primary literature is very limited; most pharmacological context derived from structural analogs --- ## Chemical Identity ### Verified Data (PubChem CID 163192824) | Field | Value | Source | |---|---|---| | Preferred IUPAC name | 2-(isopropylamino)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexan-1-one | PubChem [Ref 17] | | Alternate IUPAC | 2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(propan-2-ylamino)cyclohexan-1-one | PubChem API | | Molecular formula | C₁₆H₂₃NO₂ | PubChem [Ref 17] | | Molecular weight | 261.365 g/mol | PubChem [Ref 17] | | SMILES | CC(C)NC1(CCCCC1=O)c1cccc(OC)c1 | HandWiki [Ref 17] | | InChIKey | FTQIVDGNGXPEKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem [Ref 17] | | PubChem CID | 163192824 | Confirmed via API | | CAS number | Not officially assigned / "unknown" in MedKoo | Multiple sources | **Note on CAS number:** Some commercial sources list "72242-03-6" for MXiPr, but MedKoo explicitly marks CAS as "unknown." This number could not be cross-verified against a primary registry. The generation agent should flag this for editorial verification. **Note on molecular weight discrepancy:** The seed brief contains no molecular weight. Some vendor sources erroneously list ~273 g/mol, which corresponds to the HCl salt (261.36 + 36.46 ≈ 297.82... or possibly a different compound). The confirmed free base MW from PubChem is 261.365 g/mol. The Cayman Chemical reference standard is listed as the hydrochloride salt (Item 31545). ### Synonyms Confirmed - Methoxisopropamine (preferred common name) - MXiPr (primary abbreviation in literature) - MXiP (alternative abbreviation) - Isopropyloxetamine - Isopropyxetamine - 3-MeO-2′-Oxo-PCiPr (substitutive nomenclature) ### Structural Relationships MXiPr is the N-isopropyl homologue of methoxetamine (MXE). Structurally, replacing MXE's N-ethyl group with an N-isopropyl group gives MXiPr. It is directly related to: - **MXE** (methoxetamine, N-ethyl) — the parent research chemical - **MXPr** (methoxpropamine, N-propyl) — same series, one carbon longer - **DMXE** (deoxymethoxetamine) — same N-ethyl chain but lacks the 3-methoxy group - **Deschloroketamine (DCK)** — lacks the 3-methoxy, has N-methyl - **Ketamine** — the clinical parent compound (2-chloro, N-methyl instead of N-isopropyl/3-methoxy) The Frankenfeld et al. 2024 study designates MXiPr as "deschloro-N-isopropyl-ketamine," placing it in the deschloroketamine derivative series (Frankenfeld et al. 2024 [Ref 1]). --- ## Pharmacology ### Primary Target: NMDA Receptor **Substance-specific data:** Irie et al. (2022 [Ref 11]) determined the IC₅₀ of MXiPr at NMDA receptors to be **0.661 µM** using patch-clamp electrophysiology in NMDAR-expressing cartwheel interneurons of mice. An in silico docking study in the same paper confirmed that MXiPr interacts within the NMDAR channel pore. This is the only published, peer-reviewed pharmacological measurement specific to MXiPr. Comparative IC₅₀ values from the same paper (Irie et al. 2022 [Ref 11]): - MXE: 0.524 µM - DMXE: 0.679 µM - MXiPr: **0.661 µM** - N-desethyl MXE: 1.649 µM - O-desmethyl MXE: 0.227 µM This places MXiPr's NMDA potency between MXE and DMXE, and ~25% less potent than MXE at the receptor level. The authors explicitly identified MXiPr and DMXE as "serious concerns" given their potent NMDAR blockade and online availability since 2020 (Irie et al. 2022 [Ref 11]). **Mechanism:** NMDA receptor antagonism is uncompetitive and open-channel blocking — the same mechanism as ketamine, PCP, and MXE. Activation of the NMDA receptor by glutamate/glycine is required before the drug can enter and block the ion channel. This is thought to underlie the dissociative, hallucinogenic, and analgesic properties of this compound class (Zanos et al. 2018 [Ref 7]; Wallach & Brandt 2018 [Ref 4]). ### Secondary Targets **Sigma-1 receptor:** Not directly measured for MXiPr. The seed data lists sigma-1 agonism as a pharmacological class property. MXE and related β-keto-arylcyclohexylamines have been shown to have sigma receptor affinity (Roth et al. 2013 [Ref 3]), but this has not been confirmed for MXiPr in published literature. This is a structural class inference requiring substance-specific measurement. **Serotonin transporter (SERT):** Roth et al. (2013 [Ref 3]) demonstrated that MXE possesses affinity for SERT. Whether MXiPr shares this property is unknown; no published binding study has evaluated MXiPr at SERT. The N-isopropyl substitution may alter SERT affinity relative to the N-ethyl parent. **Dopamine/norepinephrine transporters:** No published data for MXiPr. **FLAG for generation agent:** All secondary receptor data for MXiPr relies on class inference from MXE data. There are no published multi-target binding studies for MXiPr itself. ### Pharmacokinetics **Metabolism (Frankenfeld et al. 2024 [Ref 1]):** The most detailed published data on MXiPr's pharmacokinetics is from a metabolic fate study of five deschloroketamine derivatives including MXiPr, conducted in male Wistar rats (in vivo, urine collected over 24h at 2 mg/kg body weight) and pooled human liver microsomes (in vitro). Primary metabolic pathways identified were: 1. **N-dealkylation** — loss of the isopropyl group (principal pathway, analogous to DCK and MXE metabolism) 2. **Hydroxylation** — on the aromatic ring and/or cyclohexane ring 3. **Multiple oxidations** — combinations of the above 4. Phase II: **glucuronidation** and **N-acetylation** Across all five DCK derivatives studied, 29 phase I and 10 phase II metabolites were detected. Compound-specific metabolites for MXiPr were identified by LC-HRMS/MS, enabling targeted urinary detection; however, GC-MS screening only detected non-specific acetylated N-dealkylation metabolites (Frankenfeld et al. 2024 [Ref 1]). The analogous metabolism of MXPr (N-propyl congener) includes N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr, and dihydroMXPr (Goncalves et al. 2022 [Ref 15]), providing comparative context. **Half-life:** No human pharmacokinetic studies published. The seed data lists a tolerance half-life of 5 days, which likely refers to functional (receptor-level) tolerance duration rather than plasma elimination half-life. No plasma half-life data from published studies. **Bioavailability:** No published data. Common administration routes are insufflation and oral (seed data). Oral bioavailability of MXE-class compounds is generally reduced relative to insufflation due to first-pass metabolism. **CYP enzyme involvement:** Not specifically studied for MXiPr. Arylcyclohexylamines are generally metabolized via CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 (as established for ketamine; Zanos et al. 2018 [Ref 7]). This is a class inference, not confirmed for MXiPr. **Stereochemistry:** The chiral center at C2 of the cyclohexanone ring means MXiPr exists as two enantiomers (R and S). Seibert et al. (2025 [Ref 2]) developed enantioseparation methods for 11 ketamine derivatives including MXiPr using CE-UV and HPLC-UV with optical rotation detection. Enantiomers were partially or fully separated; the enantiomer elution order was determined. However, no functional data comparing the pharmacological potency or safety profiles of R- vs. S-MXiPr has been published. For reference, S-ketamine is approximately twice as potent as R-ketamine at NMDA receptors (Zanos et al. 2018 [Ref 7]); whether MXiPr shows comparable enantioselectivity is unknown. --- ## History ### Discovery and First Appearance MXiPr first appeared on online research chemical markets in **late 2020**, according to multiple sources. The first formal laboratory identification was made by the **National Forensic Laboratory of Slovenia in December 2020** (cited in Tanaka et al. 2022 [Ref 12]; confirmed in HandWiki [Ref 17]). The compound was not previously described in pharmaceutical or academic literature before its emergence as a research chemical. MXiPr emerged as part of a wave of methoxetamine analogs designed to circumvent the scheduling of MXE, which was controlled in Japan, the UK, Germany, and many other jurisdictions by the mid-2010s. The structural strategy — replacing the N-ethyl group with N-isopropyl — mirrors a broader pattern in NPS design: minor N-alkyl substitution variations to circumvent generic scheduling definitions while preserving the pharmacological core (Wallach & Brandt 2018 [Ref 4]; Wallach & Brandt 2018 [Ref 16]). Tanaka et al. (2022 [Ref 12]) reported the identification of MXiPr alongside MXPr and DMXE in **seized illegal products in Japan**, representing the first published forensic identification of MXiPr. Irie et al. (2022 [Ref 11]) from the same research group (National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan) subsequently published the first pharmacological characterization, measuring NMDA IC₅₀. The compound has since been detected in France by a harm reduction drug-checking service (Marseille, October 2024 [Ref 14]) and was flagged in the context of emerging ketamine analogues patterns by the French Addictovigilance Network (Mezaache et al. 2026 [Ref 13]). ### Regulatory History - **December 2020:** First identified, National Forensic Laboratory, Slovenia - **April 2021:** Prohibited in Hungary - **~2021:** UK Class B designation (Misuse of Drugs Act 1971); Germany NpSG designation - **~2021–2022:** Identified in Japanese illegal product seizures - **2022:** Published in peer-reviewed forensic literature (Tanaka et al. 2022 [Ref 12]; Irie et al. 2022 [Ref 11]) - **October 2024:** Detected in drug-checking services, Marseille, France [Ref 14] --- ## Subjective Effects **No controlled human studies exist for MXiPr.** All effect descriptions come from anonymous self-reports on harm reduction and research chemical community platforms (web_retrieved [Ref 22]). Published sources (Irie et al. 2022 [Ref 11]; Tanaka et al. 2022 [Ref 12]) confirm the pharmacological basis for dissociative effects via NMDA antagonism but do not describe human subjective phenomenology. ### Dose-Dependent Phenomenology (User Reports Only [Ref 22]) **Low-to-moderate doses (roughly 5–30 mg insufflated):** - Primarily stimulating rather than sedating - Sensation of bodily lightness and weightlessness (described as particularly prominent) - Tingling body sensation localized to hands, feet, and head - Mild dissociation and mood elevation - Analgesic effects - Described as resembling nitrous oxide at threshold/light doses **Higher doses (roughly 30–60+ mg insufflated):** - Transition to sedation - Stronger dissociation — described as "hole"-like (complete ego dissolution/disconnection) at heavy doses - Internal hallucinations and conceptual thinking - Warm, dreamy afterglow following the acute phase **Aftereffects:** - Body load reported lasting up to 2 days after even small doses in some reports [Ref 22] - Afterglow described as euphoric and warm — potentially contributing to compulsive redosing ### Duration (Seed Data, Consistent with Community Reports [Ref 22]) Insufflation: - Onset: 2–5 minutes - Total: 1.5–4 hours - Aftereffects: 2–12 hours Oral: - Onset: 20–60 minutes - Total: 2–5 hours - Aftereffects: 4–48 hours **FLAG:** All duration data is unconfirmed by controlled studies. The seed data values are derived from community consensus. The aftereffect duration of up to 48 hours oral is a wide range that would benefit from editorial review. ### Effect Profile Assessment Based on class pharmacology and the NMDA IC₅₀ data, the following effects profile is pharmacologically plausible for MXiPr: The NMDA antagonism mechanism directly explains: dissociation, amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, analgesia, motor control impairment, and the dose-dependent dissociative depth. Sigma-1 agonism (if confirmed) would contribute to: antidepressant effects, euphoria, and potentially visual distortion. The absence of a ketone reduction site compared to some analogs and the bulky N-isopropyl group may influence SERT affinity and metabolic half-life relative to MXE. **FLAG for generation agent:** Effects listed in the seed database (42 effect slugs) are all marked as community_consensus_large/medium provenance with null intensity/frequency values. No peer-reviewed source provides human phenomenological data. All effect assignments should be derived from structural class inference from MXE, with appropriate confidence labeling. --- ## Safety & Toxicity ### Substance-Specific Data **Lethal dose (LD₅₀):** Not established. The seed data notes "toxic dosage is unknown." **Human overdose cases:** No published case reports involving MXiPr identified in this research. **Published adverse event data:** None substance-specific. ### Class-Based Inference (FLAG: analog inference) Fatal cases have been reported for several structurally related arylcyclohexylamine compounds: - **N-ethyldeschloroketamine (2-Oxo-PCE):** Fatal case reported (Theofel et al. 2019 [Ref 6]). Femoral blood concentration 375 µg/L. Co-administered with venlafaxine. - **2-Fluorodeschloroketamine (2-FDCK):** Two fatal cases (Riess et al. 2024 [Ref 5]). Blood concentrations 758 and 5,885 µg/L. - **2F-DCK and 3-MeO-PCE combination:** Fatal intoxication reported (Gicquel et al. 2021 [Ref 9]). The lethality in analog cases appears associated with high doses, polydrug use (particularly with CNS depressants or serotonergic agents), and underlying health factors. Whether MXiPr shares similar toxicity thresholds cannot be determined from published data. ### Specific Risk Signals **Seizure risk:** User reports describe seizures occurring at very high doses [Ref 22]. No case reports in published literature confirm this for MXiPr specifically, though NMDA antagonists as a class can affect seizure threshold (Luethi & Liechti 2020 [Ref 20]). **Uroepithelial toxicity:** Class-based concern. Studies on MXE and ketamine in chronic administration have found evidence of bladder inflammation and fibrosis. Whether MXiPr carries this risk is unknown; no human data or animal histology studies for MXiPr have been published. **Cardiovascular effects:** Class inference. NMDA antagonists including ketamine produce dose-dependent sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects (tachycardia, hypertension) via central sympathetic stimulation (Zanos et al. 2018 [Ref 7]). **Prolonged body load:** Anecdotal reports describe a body load lasting up to 2 days after small doses [Ref 22], which is longer than typically described for MXE or ketamine. This may reflect the bulkier N-isopropyl group slowing hepatic N-dealkylation, resulting in a longer functional half-life. This is speculative — no pharmacokinetic data confirm it. **Psychological risks:** Consistent with the NMDA antagonist class: anxiety, paranoia, cognitive impairment during use; potential for psychological dependence with heavy use. The antidepressant-like properties observed for ketamine and MXE may also be present, which could attract self-medication use (Zanos et al. 2018 [Ref 7]). --- ## Harm Reduction No published harm reduction guidelines specific to MXiPr exist. The following is derived from class evidence and is appropriate only as a starting framework: **Testing:** MXiPr does not appear in standard drug testing kits designed for common substances. Reagent color reactions for arylcyclohexylamines (e.g., Mecke, Mandelin, Simon's reagent) may give class-level positive responses but cannot confirm MXiPr identity. FTIR or LC-MS is required for definitive identification. Drug-checking services in France (Marseille, October 2024 [Ref 14]) have successfully identified MXiPr, suggesting appropriate laboratory methods exist. **Dosing caution:** MXiPr appears more potent than the dose ranges for some related compounds might suggest, given reports of prolonged body load at small doses. Starting with low doses (≤5 mg insufflated) and waiting fully for effects before redosing is critical. **Combination risks:** CNS depressants (opioids, benzodiazepines, GHB, alcohol) additive with sedation/respiratory depression — potentially fatal. The fatal case involving N-ethyldeschloroketamine + venlafaxine (Theofel et al. 2019 [Ref 6]) highlights the risk of combining arylcyclohexylamines with serotonergic agents. **Drug checking:** MXiPr has been found in pill form in France (October 2024), indicating it may be substituted for or mixed with other substances in tablet preparations. --- ## Tolerance & Dependence ### Tolerance No published studies characterize MXiPr-specific tolerance. The seed data states buildup "develops with prolonged and repeated use" with a half-life of 5 days and full reset at 1.5 weeks. These values are derived from community consensus with reference to related compounds (MXE, ketamine class). The mechanism of tolerance for NMDA antagonists involves receptor upregulation and compensatory glutamatergic changes. Cross-tolerance within the dissociative class (NMDA antagonists) is expected (Luethi & Liechti 2020 [Ref 20]). **FLAG:** Tolerance half-life (5 days) and reset time (1.5 weeks) in the seed data are community-derived values consistent with MXE class behavior. These are not confirmed for MXiPr in published literature. These values should be treated as structural analog inferences. ### Dependence **Physical dependence:** No published data for MXiPr. Class-based (ketamine/MXE): moderate physical dependence possible with heavy use. **Psychological dependence:** The warm afterglow and euphoria described in user reports [Ref 22], combined with the antidepressant-like properties of the NMDA antagonist class, suggest psychological dependence potential. The seed data rates psychological dependence as moderate. This is consistent with MXE class experience. **Withdrawal:** Not characterized for MXiPr. Ketamine/MXE withdrawal involves anxiety, dysphoria, craving, and insomnia. --- ## Interactions **No published drug interaction data for MXiPr.** All interaction data is class-based inference (FLAG: structural analog inference only). ### CNS Depressants Additive CNS depression with benzodiazepines, opioids, alcohol, GHB, and barbiturates. The fatal case of N-ethyldeschloroketamine (Theofel et al. 2019 [Ref 6]) involved co-presence of multiple opioids (morphine, oxycodone, metamizole) and other compounds, illustrating the danger of polydrug use in this class. ### Serotonergic Agents MXE has demonstrated SERT affinity (Roth et al. 2013 [Ref 3]). If MXiPr shares this property (unconfirmed), combinations with MAOIs, SSRIs, or other serotonergic agents could increase serotonin syndrome risk. The Theofel 2019 fatal case involved venlafaxine (SNRI) [Ref 6], making this interaction category clinically relevant to flag. ### Stimulants Combination with stimulants may mask sedation, increasing risk of dissociative overdose. Cardiovascular strain from the additive sympathomimetic effects of NMDA antagonists and stimulants is a concern. ### Other Dissociatives Cross-tolerance with other NMDA antagonists; combined use would increase dissociative intensity unpredictably. --- ## Legal Status | Jurisdiction | Status | Details | Source | |---|---|---|---| | Slovenia | First detection | National Forensic Lab, December 2020 | [Ref 17] | | Hungary | Prohibited | Production, sale, possession banned; April 2021 | [Ref 17] | | United Kingdom | Class B | Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 | [Ref 17] | | Germany | NpSG | Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (industrial/scientific use only) | [Ref 17] | | Canada | Schedule I | Controlled Drugs and Substances Act | [Ref 17] | | United States | Not federally scheduled | Federal Analogue Act may apply if intended for human consumption; California listed as Schedule I | Web searches | | Japan | Controlled | Identified in illegal product seizures; regulated under NPS law | [Ref 12] | | Australia | Unclear | Not confirmed by search; likely covered by analogue provisions of State/Territory drug acts | Not confirmed | **FLAG:** The US federal status is ambiguous. The Federal Analogue Act (21 U.S.C. § 813) covers substances substantially similar to Schedule I or II controlled substances. Ketamine is Schedule III, which technically places it outside the Analogue Act trigger for analogs. However, MXiPr's structure is also similar to PCP (Schedule II) and structural relationships to Schedule I compounds may vary by prosecutorial interpretation. This requires legal specialist review. The California Schedule I designation may reflect state-level analogue scheduling, not a specific listing of MXiPr. **FLAG:** The Australian status is unconfirmed by this research. Australia's Poisons Standard (SUSMP) does not appear to have explicitly listed MXiPr based on searches, but State and Territory drug laws may cover it under analogue provisions. The TGA would need to be consulted for confirmation. --- ## Clinical Trials No clinical trials involving MXiPr are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. No studies involving MXiPr in therapeutic contexts were identified in any database. This is expected given MXiPr's status as an emerging recreational research chemical with no pharmaceutical development history. --- ## Community Feedback Analysis No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. No community feedback to analyze. --- ## Gaps & Flags ### Safety-Critical Values Not Verified Against Published Sources 1. **FLAG [SAFETY-CRITICAL]:** All dose range values (threshold, light, common, strong, heavy) in the seed data are community-derived. No published controlled study has established human dosing parameters for MXiPr. These values are consistent with anecdotal reports and structural analog inference from MXE/DCK derivatives, but have not been verified. 2. **FLAG [SAFETY-CRITICAL]:** The "Heavy: 60+ mg" threshold and the seizure risk at high doses are based solely on user reports [Ref 22]. No published LD50 or toxic dose threshold exists. 3. **FLAG [SAFETY-CRITICAL]:** Duration values — especially the "aftereffects: 4–48 hours (oral)" range — are very wide and unconfirmed. This should be flagged in the article. 4. **FLAG [SAFETY-CRITICAL]:** No human overdose case reports specific to MXiPr have been published. The toxicity risks stated in the article must be explicitly attributed to class inference, not MXiPr-specific data. ### Contradictions Between Seed Data and Published Sources 5. **FLAG:** The seed data does not list a SMILES, molecular formula, molecular weight, InChIKey, or PubChem CID. These are now confirmed: SMILES = CC(C)NC1(CCCCC1=O)c1cccc(OC)c1; Formula = C₁₆H₂₃NO₂; MW = 261.365; InChIKey = FTQIVDGNGXPEKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N; CID = 163192824. 6. **FLAG:** The seed data lists "Sigma-1 receptor agonist" as a pharmacological class. This is a plausible class inference but has not been confirmed by published binding studies for MXiPr specifically. The generation agent should note this is class-inferred, not substance-confirmed. 7. **FLAG:** CAS number is uncertain. Some commercial sources list 72242-03-6; MedKoo lists CAS as "unknown." This discrepancy should be verified against a primary registry before publication. ### Areas Relying on Structural Analogy Rather Than Substance-Specific Data 8. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** Sigma-1 receptor agonism — inferred from MXE (Roth et al. 2013 [Ref 3]). 9. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** Serotonin transporter activity — unknown for MXiPr; inferred from MXE. 10. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** CYP enzyme involvement (CYP2B6, CYP3A4) — inferred from ketamine metabolism. 11. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** Uroepithelial/bladder toxicity — class concern from MXE studies; not documented for MXiPr. 12. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** Tolerance half-life (5 days) and reset (1.5 weeks) — community consensus from MXE class; not measured for MXiPr. 13. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** Cross-tolerance with other dissociatives — class inference; not specifically tested. 14. **FLAG [ANALOG INFERENCE]:** All drug interaction data — no published MXiPr-specific interaction studies exist. ### Unresolved Research Gaps 15. **SMILES verification:** The SMILES CC(C)NC1(CCCCC1=O)c1cccc(OC)c1 was retrieved via HandWiki (web_retrieved), which cites PubChem. This should be confirmed against the PubChem compound page directly. 16. **Enantiomer pharmacology:** Seibert et al. 2025 developed enantioseparation methods for MXiPr but published no comparative potency or safety data for R- vs. S-MXiPr. The pharmacologically active stereoisomer is unknown. 17. **US legal status:** Requires legal specialist review. The Federal Analogue Act applicability is ambiguous given ketamine's Schedule III status. 18. **Australia legal status:** Could not be confirmed. Requires consultation with TGA or state drug control authorities. 19. **Mezaache et al. 2026 [Ref 13]:** This paper (published 2026) covers emerging ketamine analogues in France and may contain specific MXiPr data (detected cases, health outcomes). The abstract was insufficient to confirm whether MXiPr is specifically discussed. Full-text review is recommended before generation. 20. **Seibert et al. 2025 [Ref 2]:** The full enantioseparation paper may contain detailed analytical characterization data (NMR, MS) useful for the chemistry section. Full-text access was not available during this research. 21. **Tanaka et al. 2022 [Ref 12]:** Published in Japanese (Yakugaku Zasshi). Full analytical characterization data (NMR, MS spectra, structural confirmation) may be in the paper body but was not accessible from the English abstract. A Japanese-language review or translation of the analytical section would benefit the chemistry section. --- ## Source Quality Summary | Source Type | Count | Notes | |---|---|---| | Primary research (peer-reviewed) | 6 | Refs 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 15 | | Review articles | 6 | Refs 4, 7, 8, 16, 19, 20 | | Case reports | 3 | Refs 5, 6, 9 | | Web-retrieved (institutional) | 2 | Refs 17, 18 | | Web-retrieved (harm reduction/community) | 3 | Refs 14, 21, 22 | **Only Refs 11 and 12 (Irie 2022 and Tanaka 2022) provide substance-specific primary data on MXiPr.** All other data is either class/analog-based or community-report-based. The generation agent should apply conservative confidence framing throughout the article, particularly in pharmacology, dosing, and safety sections.