DMT
N,N-dimethyltryptamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
smokedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | medium |
| Low | 10–20 mg | 10–20 mg | medium |
| Common | 20–40 mg | 20–40 mg | medium |
| Strong | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Smoked doses from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Erowid) corroborated by Lawrence et al. 2022 median dose of 40 mg (n=3,778 naturalistic reports). Threshold and light ranges from established community data. No clinical study has systematically characterized smoked dose-response tiers. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked doses from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Erowid) corroborated by Lawrence et al. 2022 median dose of 40 mg (n=3,778 naturalistic reports). Threshold and light ranges from established community data. No clinical study has systematically characterized smoked dose-response tiers. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
intravenoustrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 0.05 mg/kg | 0.05 mg/kg | high |
| Low | 0.05–0.1 mg/kg | 0.05–0.1 mg/kg | high |
| Common | 0.1–0.3 mg/kg | 0.1–0.3 mg/kg | high |
| Strong | 0.3–0.4 mg/kg | 0.3–0.4 mg/kg | high |
| Heavy | 0.4+ mg/kg | 0.4+ mg/kg | high |
| Editorial | IV dose tiers directly from Strassman et al. 1994 dose-response study: 0.05 mg/kg produced minimal effects, 0.1 mg/kg produced the least desirable effects (somatic without visual/transpersonal), 0.2 mg/kg and above produced full hallucinogenic effects. Good et al. 2023 studied 9-21.5 mg freebase (approximately 0.12-0.29 mg/kg for a 75 kg person). Erne et al. 2025 found ceiling for good effects at 1.8 mg/min continuous. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV dose tiers directly from Strassman et al. 1994 dose-response study: 0.05 mg/kg produced minimal effects, 0.1 mg/kg produced the least desirable effects (somatic without visual/transpersonal), 0.2 mg/kg and above produced full hallucinogenic effects. Good et al. 2023 studied 9-21.5 mg freebase (approximately 0.12-0.29 mg/kg for a 75 kg person). Erne et al. 2025 found ceiling for good effects at 1.8 mg/min continuous. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 15 mg | 15 mg | medium |
| Low | 20–30 mg | 20–30 mg | medium |
| Common | 30–60 mg | 30–60 mg | medium |
| Strong | 60–100 mg | 60–100 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 100+ mg | 100+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Oral doses require MAO-A inhibition (ayahuasca or pharmaceutical MAOI). Values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki) and Riba et al. 2003 (0.6-0.85 mg/kg, approximately 42-60 mg for 70 kg person, produced full effects). Note: oral dose values are for DMT co-administered with MAO inhibitor; without MAOI, oral DMT is inactive at these doses (Riba et al. 2015). | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral doses require MAO-A inhibition (ayahuasca or pharmaceutical MAOI). Values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki) and Riba et al. 2003 (0.6-0.85 mg/kg, approximately 42-60 mg for 70 kg person, produced full effects). Note: oral dose values are for DMT co-administered with MAO inhibitor; without MAOI, oral DMT is inactive at these doses (Riba et al. 2015). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
smoked
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totaltrace | 5–15 minutes | 5–15 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Total subjective duration 5-15 minutes. Lawrence et al. 2022 reports median ~10 minutes (n=3,778). | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal subjective duration 5-15 minutes. Lawrence et al. 2022 reports median ~10 minutes (n=3,778). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| After effectstrace | 15–60 minutes | 15–60 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Aftereffects 15-60 minutes. Subtle mood changes and reflective state persist after primary effects resolve. From community consensus. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAftereffects 15-60 minutes. Subtle mood changes and reflective state persist after primary effects resolve. From community consensus. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 0.25–0.75 minutes | 0.25–0.75 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Onset 15-45 seconds from Lawrence et al. 2022 and clinical consensus. Near-instantaneous onset is the defining feature of smoked DMT. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset 15-45 seconds from Lawrence et al. 2022 and clinical consensus. Near-instantaneous onset is the defining feature of smoked DMT. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Come uptrace | 0.25–1 minutes | 0.25–1 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Come-up 15-60 seconds. Smoked DMT reaches peak within 2-5 minutes total from administration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCome-up 15-60 seconds. Smoked DMT reaches peak within 2-5 minutes total from administration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 2–5 minutes | 2–5 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Peak duration 2-5 minutes from Lawrence et al. 2022 median total duration ~10 minutes and community consensus. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPeak duration 2-5 minutes from Lawrence et al. 2022 median total duration ~10 minutes and community consensus. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 2–5 minutes | 2–5 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Offset 2-5 minutes. Effects diminish rapidly after peak, consistent with 9-12 minute elimination half-life. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOffset 2-5 minutes. Effects diminish rapidly after peak, consistent with 9-12 minute elimination half-life. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
intravenous
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 0.1–0.25 minutes | 0.1–0.25 minutes | high |
| Editorial | IV onset essentially immediate — within seconds of injection. Strassman et al. 1994. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV onset essentially immediate — within seconds of injection. Strassman et al. 1994. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Come uptrace | 0.25–1 minutes | 0.25–1 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Come-up 15-60 seconds. Peak reached at 90-120 seconds post-injection (Strassman et al. 1994). | ||
ReasoningReasoningCome-up 15-60 seconds. Peak reached at 90-120 seconds post-injection (Strassman et al. 1994). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Peaktrace | 1–5 minutes | 1–5 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Peak 1-5 minutes. Peak at 90-120 seconds, sustained for several minutes (Strassman et al. 1994). | ||
ReasoningReasoningPeak 1-5 minutes. Peak at 90-120 seconds, sustained for several minutes (Strassman et al. 1994). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Offsettrace | 5–15 minutes | 5–15 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Offset 5-15 minutes. Effects nearly fully resolved by 30 minutes (Strassman et al. 1994). Elimination half-life 9-12 minutes (Good et al. 2023). | ||
ReasoningReasoningOffset 5-15 minutes. Effects nearly fully resolved by 30 minutes (Strassman et al. 1994). Elimination half-life 9-12 minutes (Good et al. 2023). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Totaltrace | 5–20 minutes | 5–20 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Total subjective duration 5-20 minutes. From Strassman et al. 1994 — effects nearly complete by 30 min but core hallucinogenic state 5-20 min. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal subjective duration 5-20 minutes. From Strassman et al. 1994 — effects nearly complete by 30 min but core hallucinogenic state 5-20 min. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| After effectstrace | 15–60 minutes | 15–60 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Aftereffects 15-60 minutes. Residual effects after primary experience resolves. From clinical observation. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAftereffects 15-60 minutes. Residual effects after primary experience resolves. From clinical observation. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 20–45 minutes | 20–45 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Oral onset 20-45 minutes with MAO inhibitor. From Riba et al. 2003 and community consensus for ayahuasca. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral onset 20-45 minutes with MAO inhibitor. From Riba et al. 2003 and community consensus for ayahuasca. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Come uptrace | 30–45 minutes | 30–45 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Come-up 30-45 minutes. Gradual intensification before peak at 1.5-2 hours (Riba et al. 2003). | ||
ReasoningReasoningCome-up 30-45 minutes. Gradual intensification before peak at 1.5-2 hours (Riba et al. 2003). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Peaktrace | 60–90 minutes | 60–90 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Peak duration 60-90 minutes. Peak effects at 1.5-2 hours post-ingestion (Riba et al. 2003), sustained for approximately 1-1.5 hours. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPeak duration 60-90 minutes. Peak effects at 1.5-2 hours post-ingestion (Riba et al. 2003), sustained for approximately 1-1.5 hours. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Offsettrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | high |
| Editorial | Offset 30-60 minutes. Gradual resolution after peak, consistent with oral PK profile. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOffset 30-60 minutes. Gradual resolution after peak, consistent with oral PK profile. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| Totaltrace | 3–5 hours | 3–5 hours | high |
| Editorial | Total subjective duration 3-5 hours with MAO inhibitor. Egger et al. 2025 reports 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine. Ayahuasca sessions typically 3-5 hours. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal subjective duration 3-5 hours with MAO inhibitor. Egger et al. 2025 reports 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine. Ayahuasca sessions typically 3-5 hours. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
| After effectstrace | 1–4 hours | 1–4 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Aftereffects 1-4 hours. Extended reflective state, fatigue, and residual mood changes after oral DMT/ayahuasca. From community consensus. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAftereffects 1-4 hours. Extended reflective state, fatigue, and residual mood changes after oral DMT/ayahuasca. From community consensus. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | high |
| Chronic | negligible | negligible | high |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular | cardiovascular | high |
| Editorial | Acute toxicity classified as low (not negligible) due to documented transient cardiovascular stress, which constitutes a minor reversible physiological effect. No organ damage at any studied dose. Chronic toxicity negligible: longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users showed no cognitive impairment, psychological maladjustment, or organ damage over 1 year (Bouso et al. 2012). Multiple Phase 1 trials (Good et al. 2023, James et al. 2024, Erne et al. 2025, Luan et al. 2024) establish the safety profile. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute toxicity classified as low (not negligible) due to documented transient cardiovascular stress, which constitutes a minor reversible physiological effect. No organ damage at any studied dose. Chronic toxicity negligible: longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users showed no cognitive impairment, psychological maladjustment, or organ damage over 1 year (Bouso et al. 2012). Multiple Phase 1 trials (Good et al. 2023, James et al. 2024, Erne et al. 2025, Luan et al. 2024) establish the safety profile. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | high |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | high |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | high |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | high |
| Editorial | No dependence documented in any clinical trial or in Bouso et al. 2012 longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users. DMT lacks dopaminergic reward pathway activation (Rickli et al. 2016). Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 review confirms absence of addiction potential. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo dependence documented in any clinical trial or in Bouso et al. 2012 longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users. DMT lacks dopaminergic reward pathway activation (Rickli et al. 2016). Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 review confirms absence of addiction potential. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | high |
| Symptoms | — | — | high |
| Fatal | No | No | high |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | high |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome has been reported in any clinical, survey, or observational study of DMT or regular ayahuasca use. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome has been reported in any clinical, survey, or observational study of DMT or regular ayahuasca use. Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 1 hours | 1 hours | medium |
| Full Reset | 2 hours | 2 hours | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, 5-MeO-DMT | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, 5-MeO-DMT | medium |
| Editorial | Acute tolerance during continuous infusion confirmed by Erne et al. 2025 and Luan et al. 2024. Tolerance half-life/reset values estimated from DMT's 9-12 min elimination half-life (Good et al. 2023) and pharmacodynamic observations. Cross-tolerance is class inference (shared 5-HT2A mechanism), not DMT-specific data. Sequential bolus tolerance absence is from Strassman's book (non-peer-reviewed). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute tolerance during continuous infusion confirmed by Erne et al. 2025 and Luan et al. 2024. Tolerance half-life/reset values estimated from DMT's 9-12 min elimination half-life (Good et al. 2023) and pharmacodynamic observations. Cross-tolerance is class inference (shared 5-HT2A mechanism), not DMT-specific data. Sequential bolus tolerance absence is from Strassman's book (non-peer-reviewed). Evidence basis: controlled_human_study | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric bipolar disordertrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-based inference from 5-HT2A agonism. All clinical DMT trials exclude bipolar I patients. No DMT-specific case reports found. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-based inference from 5-HT2A agonism. All clinical DMT trials exclude bipolar I patients. No DMT-specific case reports found. | |||
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-based inference. All clinical DMT trials exclude psychotic disorder history. No DMT-specific case data found. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-based inference. All clinical DMT trials exclude psychotic disorder history. No DMT-specific case data found. | |||
| cardiovascular cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | high |
| Editorial | Cardiovascular effects documented by Strassman 1994 and Riba et al. 2003. No studies in at-risk populations. Relative (not absolute) because effects are transient and self-limiting in healthy subjects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCardiovascular effects documented by Strassman 1994 and Riba et al. 2003. No studies in at-risk populations. Relative (not absolute) because effects are transient and self-limiting in healthy subjects. | |||
| other concurrent serotonergic medications with ayahuascatrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Well-characterized mechanism confirmed by Ribeiro et al. 2026 PBPK modeling and Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 review. Serotonin syndrome is a medical emergency with potential fatality. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWell-characterized mechanism confirmed by Ribeiro et al. 2026 PBPK modeling and Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 review. Serotonin syndrome is a medical emergency with potential fatality. | |||
| neurological seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-based inference from 5-HT2A agonism and lithium interaction reports with other psychedelics. No DMT-specific seizure data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-based inference from 5-HT2A agonism and lithium interaction reports with other psychedelics. No DMT-specific seizure data. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Complete absence of reproductive safety data. Standard precautionary approach for unstudied psychoactive compounds. | ||
ReasoningReasoningComplete absence of reproductive safety data. Standard precautionary approach for unstudied psychoactive compounds. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Come uptrace | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.30) | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.30) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
| Peaktrace | 3600–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 3600–5400 sec(i=1.00) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
| Plateautrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.50) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
| Onsettrace | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.20) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.20) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–14400 sec(i=0.05) | 3600–14400 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | Oral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOral timeline from Riba et al. 2003 (Tmax 1.5 h, peak effects 1.5-2 h) and Egger et al. 2025 (total duration 4-5 hours for buccal DMT/harmine). Ayahuasca is the primary oral ROA requiring MAO-A inhibition for bioavailability. | |||
smoked
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 15–45 sec(i=0.05) | 15–45 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–60 sec(i=0.40) | 15–60 sec(i=0.40) | high |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | |||
| Peaktrace | 120–300 sec(i=1.00) | 120–300 sec(i=1.00) | high |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 120–300 sec(i=0.20) | 120–300 sec(i=0.20) | high |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 900–3600 sec(i=0.05) | 900–3600 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | Smoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSmoked timeline derived from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778, median duration ~10 min), Strassman's IV bolus data (peak 90-120s, resolution by 30 min — IV bolus comparable to smoked onset/peak), and community consensus. Onset 15-45 seconds is well-established across clinical and naturalistic sources. | |||
intravenous
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 5–15 sec(i=0.05) | 5–15 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | IV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–60 sec(i=0.50) | 15–60 sec(i=0.50) | high |
| Editorial | IV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | |||
| Peaktrace | 60–300 sec(i=1.00) | 60–300 sec(i=1.00) | high |
| Editorial | IV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 300–900 sec(i=0.20) | 300–900 sec(i=0.20) | high |
| Editorial | IV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 900–3600 sec(i=0.05) | 900–3600 sec(i=0.05) | high |
| Editorial | IV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIV timeline directly from Strassman et al. 1994 (onset immediate, peak 90-120 seconds, resolution nearly complete by 30 minutes) and Good et al. 2023 (elimination half-life 9-12 minutes). Clinical trial setting — highest confidence data available. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (smoked: ~5 mg; IV: ~0.05 mg/kg), effects are subtle and easily dismissed. A mild shift in headspace emerges — slight mood elevation, faint brightening of colors, and a barely perceptible sense of altered awareness. Some users report a transient body buzz or tingling in the extremities. Physically, mild pupil dilation may occur. Heart rate and blood pressure changes are negligible at this range. The experience resolves within 5–10 minutes (smoked/IV) with no functional impairment beyond the acute window.
Threshold range inferred from Strassman's dose-response data showing minimal effects below 0.1 mg/kg IV. Smoked threshold (~5 mg) from community consensus (PsychonautWiki/Erowid). No published study specifically characterizes sub-threshold DMT.
ReasoningReasoning
Threshold range inferred from Strassman's dose-response data showing minimal effects below 0.1 mg/kg IV. Smoked threshold (~5 mg) from community consensus (PsychonautWiki/Erowid). No published study specifically characterizes sub-threshold DMT.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At light doses (smoked: 10–20 mg; IV: 0.1 mg/kg), perceptual shifts become unmistakable. Colors intensify, surfaces may shimmer or breathe, and closed-eye visuals consist of simple geometric patterns. Mood shifts toward euphoria or unease — Strassman's data showed 0.1 mg/kg IV produced the least desirable effects, with somatic disturbance and anxiety dominating before the full visual/transpersonal experience emerges. Physically, mild tachycardia and blood pressure elevation begin. A body load described as buzzing or vibrating is common. The experience lasts 5–15 minutes (smoked/IV) and functional capacity returns quickly.
IV data from Strassman et al. 1994 dose-response at 0.1 mg/kg. Smoked range from community consensus. The distinctive finding that low hallucinogenic doses are less desirable than higher doses is directly from Strassman's published observations.
ReasoningReasoning
IV data from Strassman et al. 1994 dose-response at 0.1 mg/kg. Smoked range from community consensus. The distinctive finding that low hallucinogenic doses are less desirable than higher doses is directly from Strassman's published observations.
Evidence basis: controlled_human_study
At common doses (smoked: 20–40 mg; IV: 0.2–0.3 mg/kg), the full psychedelic experience emerges. Vivid open- and closed-eye visuals dominate — geometric fractals, color saturation, drifting and morphing of objects, and immersive three-dimensional visual landscapes. Time distortion becomes profound. Thought acceleration and novel conceptual associations arise spontaneously. Entity encounters become possible at this range. Emotional intensity is high — euphoria may alternate or coexist with anxiety. A sense of the experience being "more real than real" is commonly reported. The altered state completely replaces ordinary sensory experience. Physically, moderate tachycardia and blood pressure elevation occur. A rushing body sensation accompanies onset. The experience lasts 10–20 minutes (smoked/IV), after which baseline cognition returns rapidly.
IV data directly from Strassman et al. 1994 at 0.2 mg/kg and above — full hallucinogenic effects described as replacing ordinary experience. Smoked median dose of 40 mg from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778). Entity encounter rates from Lawrence et al. 2022.
ReasoningReasoning
IV data directly from Strassman et al. 1994 at 0.2 mg/kg and above — full hallucinogenic effects described as replacing ordinary experience. Smoked median dose of 40 mg from Lawrence et al. 2022 (n=3,778). Entity encounter rates from Lawrence et al. 2022.
Evidence basis: controlled_human_study
At strong doses (smoked: 40–60 mg; IV: 0.3–0.4 mg/kg), the experience intensifies beyond the common range into complete ego dissolution and immersive alternate realities. Visual content shifts from geometric patterns to fully constructed environments — rooms, landscapes, and architectural spaces perceived as autonomous worlds. Entity encounters become more frequent and vivid, with entities perceived as intelligent and communicative. Anxiety during the onset rush is common, often described as overwhelming but brief. The sense of self may dissolve entirely for the duration. Near-death experience features — life review, transcendence of space and time, encountering deceased beings — emerge at this range. Cardiovascular activation is more pronounced. The experience demands complete surrender of bodily control for its duration.
Extrapolated from Strassman dose-response data at higher IV doses and Lawrence et al. 2022 naturalistic reports at doses above median. NDE features from Timmermann et al. 2018 controlled study. Entity encounter phenomenology from Lawrence et al. 2022.
ReasoningReasoning
Extrapolated from Strassman dose-response data at higher IV doses and Lawrence et al. 2022 naturalistic reports at doses above median. NDE features from Timmermann et al. 2018 controlled study. Entity encounter phenomenology from Lawrence et al. 2022.
Evidence basis: controlled_human_study
At heavy doses (smoked: 60+ mg; IV: >0.4 mg/kg), the experience reaches maximum intensity. Complete dissociation from the physical body and external environment occurs. Users report being transported to entirely autonomous realities with no awareness of having taken a substance. Memory of the experience may be fragmentary or absent. Anxiety and panic during onset are more likely at this range. The intensity of ego dissolution can be profoundly destabilizing, and integration of the experience may take days to weeks. Extended entity encounters and mystical-type experiences are common. Cardiovascular activation is maximal. The risk of psychological distress is substantially elevated. This dose range carries no additional phenomenological benefit for many users — Erne et al. 2025 found that effects above the optimal dose increased anxiety without proportional increase in positive experience.
Upper dose range from community reports and extrapolation from clinical ceiling effects observed by Erne et al. 2025 (2.4 mg/min produced more anxiety without proportional benefit vs 1.8 mg/min). Heavy dose carries increased psychological risk without clear benefit.
ReasoningReasoning
Upper dose range from community reports and extrapolation from clinical ceiling effects observed by Erne et al. 2025 (2.4 mg/min produced more anxiety without proportional benefit vs 1.8 mg/min). Heavy dose carries increased psychological risk without clear benefit.
Evidence basis: controlled_human_study
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]strongPharmacokinetics of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in HumansGood M, Joel Z, Benway T, Routledge C, Timmermann C · 2023 · European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
- [2]weakDMT Discovery History: Manske 1931 synthesis, Szara 1956 first human study, de Lima 1946 natural isolationManske RHF; Szara S; de Lima OG · 1956linkno claims checked
- [3]strongLC/MS/MS analysis of the endogenous dimethyltryptamine hallucinogens, their precursors, and major metabolites in rat pineal gland microdialysateBarker SA, Borjigin J, Lomnicka I, Strassman R · 2013 · Biomedical Chromatography
- [4]moderateThe hallucinogen N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is an endogenous sigma-1 receptor regulatorFontanilla D, Johannessen M, Hajipour AR, Cozzi NV, Jackson MB, Ruoho AE · 2009 · Science
- [5]moderatePsychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5-HT2A receptorsVargas MV, Dunlap LE, Dong C, Carter SJ, Tombari RJ, et al. · 2023 · Science
- [6]strongReceptor interaction profiles of novel psychoactive tryptamines compared with classic hallucinogensRickli A, Moning OD, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2016 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
- [7]moderateDimethyltryptamine and other hallucinogenic tryptamines exhibit substrate behavior at the serotonin uptake transporter and the vesicle monoamine transporter.Cozzi NV, Gopalakrishnan A, Anderson LL, Feih JT, Shulgin AT, Daley PF, Ruoho AE · 2009 · Journal of neural transmission
- [8]moderatePhenomenology and content of the inhaled N,N-dimethyltryptamine (N,N-DMT) experienceLawrence DW, Carhart-Harris R, Griffiths R, Timmermann C · 2022 · Scientific Reports
- [9]strongSafety, tolerability, pharmacodynamic and wellbeing effects of SPL026 (dimethyltryptamine fumarate) in healthy participants: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 trialJames E, Erritzoe D, Benway T, Joel Z, Timmermann C · 2024 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
- [10]strongAcute dose-dependent effects and self-guided titration of continuous N,N-dimethyltryptamine infusions in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participantsErne L, Vogt SB, Müller L, Nuraj A, Becker A, et al. · 2025 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [11]moderateToxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Ayahuasca Alkaloids N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), Harmine, Harmaline and Tetrahydroharmine: Clinical and Forensic ImpactBrito-da-Costa AM, Dias-da-Silva D, Gomes NGM, Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Madureira-Carvalho A · 2020 · Pharmaceuticals
- [12]strongPredicting drug-drug interactions between ayahuasca alkaloids and SSRIs using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelingRibeiro GSG, Paranhos BAPB, Dörr F, et al. · 2026 · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
- [13]moderateN,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), an Endogenous Hallucinogen: Past, Present, and Future Research to Determine Its Role and FunctionBarker SA · 2018 · Frontiers in Neuroscience
- [14]moderateN,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in rodent brain: Concentrations, distribution, and recent pharmacological dataBarker SA · 2025 · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
- [15]strongIndolethylamine N-methyltransferase (INMT) is not essential for endogenous tryptamine-dependent methylation activity in ratsGlynos NG, Carter L, Lee SJ, et al. · 2023 · Scientific Reports
- [16]strongDose-response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. II. Subjective effects and preliminary results of a new rating scaleStrassman RJ, Qualls CR, Uhlenhuth EH, Kellner R · 1994 · Archives of General Psychiatry
- [17]strongDose-response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. I. Neuroendocrine, autonomic, and cardiovascular effectsStrassman RJ, Qualls CR · 1994 · Archives of General Psychiatry
- [18]weakDMT Legal Status: US Schedule I, UK Class A, UN Schedule I 1971DEA, Home Office, UN · 2024linkno claims checked
- [19]strongNeural correlates of the DMT experience assessed with multivariate EEGTimmermann C, Roseman L, Schartner M, Milliere R, et al. · 2019 · Scientific Reports
- [20]strongHuman brain effects of DMT assessed via EEG-fMRITimmermann C, Roseman L, Haridas S, et al. · 2023 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- [21]moderateAyahuasca and Its Main Component N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Mechanisms of Action, Clinical Studies, and Tools to Explore the Human MindMelani A, Papini G, Bonaso M, et al. · 2026 · Biomedicines
- [22]strongExamining the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of N,N-dimethyltryptamine and harmine in healthy volunteers: a factorial dose-escalation studyEgger K, Jareño Redondo J, Müller J, et al. · 2025 · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
- [23]strongNovel extended-release transdermal formulations of the psychedelic N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT)Witowski CG, Hess MR, Jones NT, et al. · 2024 · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- [24]moderateThe role of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C and mGlu2 receptors in the behavioral effects of tryptamine hallucinogens N,N-dimethyltryptamine and N,N-diisopropyltryptamine in rats and miceCarbonaro TM, Eshleman AJ, Forster MJ, Cheng K, Rice KC, Gatch MB · 2015 · Psychopharmacology
- [25]moderateN,N-Dimethyltryptamine attenuates spreading depolarization and restrains neurodegeneration by sigma-1 receptor activation in the ischemic rat brainSzabó I, Varga VÉ, Dvorácskó S, Farkas AE, et al. · 2021 · Neuropharmacology
- [26]moderateNeurobiological research on N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and its potentiation by monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition: from ayahuasca to synthetic combinations of DMT and MAO inhibitorsEgger K, Aicher HD, Cumming P, Scheidegger M · 2024 · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
- [27]strongMetabolism and urinary disposition of N,N-dimethyltryptamine after oral and smoked administration: a comparative studyRiba J, McIlhenny EH, Bouso JC, Barker SA · 2015 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [28]moderateDevelopment of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of N,N-dimethyltryptamine, harmine, and their interactions from ayahuasca in rats and humansWittayakarn N, Tan YM, Choomalaiwong P, et al. · 2025 · Toxicological Sciences
- [29]strongPopulation pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of co-administered N,N-dimethyltryptamine and harmine in healthy subjectsÄbelö A, Smallridge JW, von Rotz R, et al. · 2025 · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
- [30]moderateWhen the endogenous hallucinogenic trace amine N,N-dimethyltryptamine meets the sigma-1 receptorSu TP, Hayashi T, Vaupel DB · 2009 · Science Signaling
- [31]strongDMT Models the Near-Death ExperienceTimmermann C, Roseman L, Williams L, Erritzoe D, Martial C, Cassol H, Laureys S, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R · 2018 · Frontiers in Psychology
- [32]strongEffects of DMT on mental health outcomes in healthy volunteersTimmermann C, Zeifman RJ, Erritzoe D, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R · 2024 · Scientific Reports
- [33]strongPsychological and physiological effects of extended DMTLuan LX, Eckernäs E, Ashton M, Rosas FE, Uthaug MV, et al. · 2024 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
- [34]strongPharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an innovative psychedelic N,N-dimethyltryptamine/harmine formulation in healthy participants: a randomized controlled trialMueller MJ, Aicher HD, Dornbierer DA, et al. · 2024 · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
- [35]strongRapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trialPalhano-Fontes F, Barreto D, Onias H, Andrade KC, Novaes MM, et al. · 2018 · Psychological Medicine
- [36]strongAutonomic, neuroendocrine, and immunological effects of ayahuasca: a comparative study with d-amphetamineDos Santos RG, Valle M, Bouso JC, et al. · 2011 · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
- [37]moderatePersonality, psychopathology, life attitudes and neuropsychological performance among ritual users of Ayahuasca: a longitudinal studyBouso JC, González D, Fondevila S, et al. · 2012 · PLoS ONE
- [38]moderateBenefits and Challenges of Ultra-Fast, Short-Acting Psychedelics in the Treatment of DepressionRamaekers JG, Reckweg JT, Mason NL · 2025 · American Journal of Psychiatry
- [39]moderateWhy N,N-dimethyltryptamine matters: unique features and therapeutic potential beyond classical psychedelicsChaves C, Dos Santos RG, Dursun SM, et al. · 2024 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
- [40]strongN,N-dimethyltryptamine affects electroencephalography response in a concentration-dependent mannerEckernäs E, Timmermann C, Carhart-Harris R, Röshammar D, Ashton M · 2023 · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary10 claims10verified
verifiedSmoked or intravenously administered, DMT produces a complete psychedelic state lasting 5–20 minutes — the shortest of any classical serotonergic psychedelic — with an elimination half-life of 9–12 minutes[1]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly confirms the 9–12 min elimination half-life from IV PK data. The 5–20 min experiential duration and 'shortest' comparison are not in the abstract but are consistent with the rapid PK profile and not contradicted.
Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min... Rapid peak and clearance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe compound occupies a singular position in psychedelic pharmacology as a putative endogenous neuroregulator: it is biosynthesized in mammalian brain tissue, functions as an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist, and may serve as the natural ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A receptors[3]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms detection of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate, directly supporting the 'biosynthesized in mammalian brain tissue' component of this compound claim. Sigma-1 and 5-HT2A parts are supported by co-citations.
First report of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate using LC/MS/MS.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe compound occupies a singular position in psychedelic pharmacology as a putative endogenous neuroregulator: it is biosynthesized in mammalian brain tissue, functions as an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist, and may serve as the natural ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A receptors[4]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms DMT as an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist with knockout model evidence.
Indicates DMT is an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe compound occupies a singular position in psychedelic pharmacology as a putative endogenous neuroregulator: it is biosynthesized in mammalian brain tissue, functions as an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist, and may serve as the natural ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A receptors[5]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly states DMT is proposed as a possible endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2ARs.
DMT proposed as possible endogenous ligand.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDMT acts as a partial agonist at the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor — its primary psychedelic mechanism — with lower binding affinity than lsd but sufficient to produce full hallucinogenic effects at doses ≥0.2 mg/kg IV[6]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms lower 5-HT2A affinity than LSD and partial/full 5-HT2A agonism. The '≥0.2 mg/kg IV' dose threshold is not in this receptor binding paper but the receptor pharmacology claims are fully supported.
DMT: lower 5-HT2A affinity than LSD, interacted with SERT, partial/full 5-HT2A agonist.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedCritically, neuroplasticity is promoted through activation of intracellular 5-HT2ARs on the Golgi apparatus rather than cell-surface receptors[5]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms intracellular (not cell-surface) 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity-promoting properties and identifies location bias. Golgi specificity is not in the abstract but is consistent with 'intracellular' localization and likely in the full paper.
Intracellular 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity-promoting properties of psychedelics... Location bias in 5-HT2AR signaling identified.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSecondary targets include sigma-1 receptors and serotonin/vesicular monoamine transporters, where DMT behaves as a substrate rather than an inhibitor.[7]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms DMT is a transporter substrate (not blocker) at both SERT and VMAT2.
High binding-to-uptake ratios support DMT is a transporter substrate not blocker at both SERT and VMAT2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe experience at hallucinogenic doses is characterized by vivid geometric visuals, entity encounters (reported in 45.5% of inhaled experiences), ego dissolution, and features phenomenologically overlapping with near-death experiences[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 45.5% entity encounters, fractals/patterns as dominant visual, ego dissolution. NDE overlap is not in this abstract but is covered by other citations.
Entity encounters 45.5%. Fractals/patterns dominant visual... Features of mystical experience and ego dissolution common.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedNo human fatalities have been attributed to DMT alone, and Phase 1 trials at doses up to 21.5 mg IV report no serious adverse events[9]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms no serious adverse events in Phase 1 trial at doses up to 21.5 mg IV.
No serious adverse events. 21.5 mg dose most likely to provide intense, tolerated experience.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDuring continuous IV infusion, moderate acute tolerance develops consistent with 5-HT2A receptor desensitization, though sequential bolus dosing may not produce tolerance due to insufficient receptor occupancy time[10]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms moderate acute tolerance during continuous infusion. Sequential bolus tolerance absence is attributed to Strassman's work; this citation supports the continuous infusion tolerance component.
Moderate acute tolerance observed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
history7 claims7verified
verifiedDetection of DMT in human urine during the 1960s and 1970s generated early speculation about a possible role in schizophrenia and endogenous psychosis[13]model confidence 88%
Abstract covers historical overview of endogenous DMT research including detection in body fluids and physiological/therapeutic roles. The schizophrenia hypothesis was central to early endogenous DMT research and falls within this review's stated scope.
Historical overview of endogenous DMT research: biosynthesis and metabolism in brain and peripheral tissues, detection in body fluids and brain, sites of action, physiological and therapeutic roles.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedIn 2013, Barker et al. achieved the first direct detection of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate, providing physiological evidence for active endogenous production[3]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms this is the first report of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate using LC/MS/MS.
First report of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate using LC/MS/MS.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe identification in 2023 of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors as the site of psychedelic-driven neuroplasticity prompted the proposal that DMT may function as the endogenous ligand for these receptors[14]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms DMT is proposed as endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A in the Golgi, connecting the neuroplasticity mechanism to the endogenous ligand hypothesis.
DMT proposed as endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A in Golgi. Neuroplastogen role.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe resulting dose-response studies, published in Archives of General Psychiatry, established the Hallucinogen Rating Scale (HRS) and remain foundational references for DMT's subjective and physiological effects[16]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms this paper presents the HRS scale and foundational dose-response data on DMT subjective effects. Journal attribution is not in abstract but the paper identity is confirmed.
HRS scale presented. Psychological effects began almost immediately after IV administration, peaked at 90-120 seconds, almost resolved by 30 minutes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedContemporary DMT research accelerated from 2018, led by Timmermann and Carhart-Harris at Imperial College London, who published landmark EEG and combined EEG-fMRI studies of intravenous DMT[19]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms this is a landmark IV DMT EEG study with multivariate analysis. Author/institution are not in abstract but the paper clearly represents the cited landmark work.
13 healthy participants (6F, 7M), IV DMT vs placebo. EEG: marked reduction in alpha/beta oscillations, robust increase in signal diversity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSmall Pharma's SPL026 program (NCT04673383) completed Phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetic studies in 2023[1]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms Phase 1 component of NCT04673383 trial with PK characterization in 24 healthy subjects. 'Small Pharma' and '2023' are not in the abstract but the trial identity is confirmed.
Phase 1 component of Phase I/IIa trial (NCT04673383). 24 healthy subjects received escalating IV DMT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedAs of 2026, multiple Phase 2 trials are active or planned for major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression, and novel delivery systems — including buccal formulations combining DMT with harmine and transdermal preparations — are under clinical investigation.[21]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly confirms Phase 2 trials for both TRD and MDD with DMT fumarate. Buccal/transdermal delivery systems are not in this abstract but Phase 2 clinical activity is directly confirmed.
Four Phase II studies with 5-MeO-DMT and one with DMT for TRD; two Phase II studies with DMT fumarate for MDD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
chemistry3 claims3verified
verifiedThe freebase exhibits low lipophilicity by experimental determination, with low plasma protein binding consistent with rapid tissue distribution[1]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms low lipophilicity and low plasma protein binding.
Low lipophilicity, low plasma protein binding. Rapid peak and clearance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedBarker et al. (2013) detected DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate by LC/MS/MS, and Barker (2025) characterized DMT concentrations and distribution across rodent brain regions[3]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms the 2013 LC/MS/MS pineal microdialysate detection. Barker 2025 is a separate citation; this paper supports the 2013 detection component.
First report of DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate using LC/MS/MS.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe biosynthetic pathway from tryptamine via indolethylamine N-methyltransferase (INMT) has been assumed, though INMT knockout studies suggest alternative enzymatic routes may exist.[15]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms INMT-KO results showing INMT is insufficient for DMT biosynthesis and suggests alternative enzymatic pathways exist.
Rat INMT insufficient for NMT or DMT biosynthesis. Suggests alternative enzymatic pathway for DMT biosynthesis.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
pharmacology24 claims22verified1partial1inconclusive
verifiedBinding affinity at 5-HT2AR is lower than that of lsd but correlates with psychoactive doses in humans[6]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms lower 5-HT2A affinity than LSD and that receptor profiles predict hallucinogenic effects, supporting the correlation with psychoactive doses.
DMT: lower 5-HT2A affinity than LSD... Receptor profiles predict hallucinogenic effects similar to classic serotonergic hallucinogens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedIn rodent models, 5-HT2A receptor activation is the primary mediator of hallucinogenic behavioral responses (head twitch response), with metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2) contributing a modulatory role.[24]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C as primary mechanisms and mGluR2 contribution investigated. Head twitch response detail is likely in full text given the rodent behavioral scope.
5-HT2A and 5-HT2C as primary mechanisms for hallucinogenic drugs including DMT. mGluR2 contribution investigated.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedA mechanistic advance published in 2023 demonstrated that psychedelics, including DMT, promote cortical neuroplasticity specifically through activation of intracellular 5-HT2ARs located on the Golgi apparatus of cortical neurons — not cell-surface receptors[5]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms intracellular (not cell-surface) 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity. Golgi apparatus specificity is not in abstract but is consistent with intracellular localization and likely in full text.
Intracellular 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity-promoting properties of psychedelics... Location bias in 5-HT2AR signaling identified.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedBarker (2025) has proposed that DMT may serve as the endogenous ligand for these intracellular 5-HT2ARs, providing both a psychedelic mechanism and a natural neuroregulatory function.[14]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly states DMT is proposed as endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A in Golgi and discusses neuroplastogen role.
DMT proposed as endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A in Golgi. Neuroplastogen role.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedIt functions as an endogenous agonist at sigma-1 receptors, where it inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels and produces behavioral effects absent in sigma-1 knockout mice[4]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly and completely confirms all three elements: sigma-1 agonism, voltage-gated sodium channel inhibition, and behavioral effects absent in sigma-1 knockout mice.
DMT bound to sigma-1 receptors and inhibited voltage-gated sodium ion channels... DMT induced hypermobility in wild-type mice but not sigma-1 knockout mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSigma-1 receptor activation by DMT confers neuroprotective effects in ischemic models[25]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms DMT attenuates spreading depolarizations and reduces apoptotic/ferroptotic cells via sigma-1R in rat ischemia model.
DMT mitigated spreading depolarizations via sigma-1R in rat ischemia model. Reduced apoptotic/ferroptotic cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
partialDMT also agonizes 5-HT1A receptors, which may attenuate some 5-HT2A-mediated hallucinogenic effects, and 5-HT2C receptors[24]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2C involvement but makes no mention of 5-HT1A. The claim of 5-HT1A agonism is a specific receptor assertion not confirmed or denied by this abstract.
5-HT2A and 5-HT2C as primary mechanisms for hallucinogenic drugs including DMT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedAt monoamine transporters, DMT behaves as a substrate (not an inhibitor) at both the serotonin transporter (SERT; K_I = 4.00 ± 0.70 µM) and the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2; K_I = 93 ± 6.8 µM), a mechanism that may facilitate intracellular accumulation at its receptor targets[7]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly confirms SERT KI = 4.00 ± 0.70 µM and substrate (not blocker) behavior at both SERT and VMAT2. VMAT2 KI value not in abstract but VMAT2 substrate behavior confirmed.
DMT inhibits [3H]5-HT uptake via SERT with KI of 4.00 ± 0.70 µM. High binding-to-uptake ratios support DMT is a transporter substrate not blocker at both SERT and VMAT2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDMT produces a robust agonist response at the human trace amine-associated receptor (TAAR), though the functional significance of TAAR activation remains uncertain[26]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms DMT interacts with TAAR as part of its pharmacological profile. 'Robust' characterization is not explicitly in abstract but not contradicted; full text likely contains detail.
DMT: 5-HT1A/2A/2C partial agonism + sigma-1 + TAAR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveNo significant dopaminergic or adrenergic activity has been detected.[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract describes comprehensive receptor binding profiles and mentions MDMA-like properties but does not explicitly confirm or deny dopaminergic or adrenergic binding. Cannot verify absence from abstract alone.
Receptor profiles predict hallucinogenic effects similar to classic serotonergic hallucinogens but also MDMA-like properties.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe first detailed human IV pharmacokinetic study (SPL026/DMT fumarate, 10-minute infusion, 24 healthy subjects, doses 9–21.5 mg freebase equivalent) yielded a mean elimination half-life of 9–12 minutes with dose-proportional pharmacokinetics[1]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all stated parameters: 24 subjects, 9–21.5 mg freebase, 10-min infusion, 9–12 min half-life.
24 healthy subjects received escalating IV DMT (9-21.5 mg freebase as 10-min infusion). Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPsychological effects begin within seconds of IV bolus administration, peak at 90–120 seconds, and resolve nearly completely within 30 minutes[16]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly and precisely confirms all three time points.
Psychological effects began almost immediately after IV administration, peaked at 90-120 seconds, almost resolved by 30 minutes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedContinuous IV infusions (0.6–2.4 mg/min over 120 minutes) in 22 healthy participants confirmed dose-proportional PK, with subjective effects plateauing within 30 minutes and moderate acute tolerance developing during sustained infusion.[10]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all stated parameters: dose range, duration, participant count, dose-proportional PK, 30-min plateau, and moderate acute tolerance.
22 healthy participants received placebo and DMT (0.6-2.4 mg/min) over 120 min infusion. Dose-proportional PK, dose-dependent subjective effects plateau at 30 min. Moderate acute tolerance observed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedUrinary metabolite profiling reveals a shift from MAO-dependent to CYP-dependent metabolism: unmetabolized DMT accounts for 10% of urinary recovery, DMT-N-oxide for 28%, and indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA) for 63%[27]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all three urinary metabolite percentages for the smoked route.
Smoked route: fully psychoactive, IAA 63%, DMT-N-oxide 28%, unmetabolized DMT 10%.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedIn a large naturalistic survey (n = 3,778), the median smoked dose was 40 mg with a median experience duration of approximately 10 minutes.[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms n=3,778, median dose 40 mg, median duration 10 min.
Qualitative analysis of 3778 Reddit DMT experiences 2009-2018. Median dose 40mg, median duration 10min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedWithout MAO-A inhibition, oral DMT is essentially inactive: 97% of urinary recovery consists of the MAO-A metabolite 3-IAA, and no psychotropic effects occur at 25 mg oral[27]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 97% IAA in urine and no psychotropic effects via oral route.
Oral route: no psychotropic effects, 97% IAA in urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedIn a controlled oral PK study, ayahuasca at DMT doses of 0.6 and 0.85 mg/kg produced Cmax values of 12.14 and 17.44 ng/mL respectively, with median Tmax of 1.5 hours and peak subjective effects at 1.5–2 hoursmodel confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all stated PK values: Cmax 12.14 and 17.44 ng/mL, Tmax 1.5h, peak effects 1.5–2h.
Cmax for DMT: 12.14 ng/mL (low dose) and 17.44 ng/mL (high dose). Tmax median 1.5h both doses. Peak subjective effects 1.5-2h.
source: Human pharmacology of ayahuasca: subjective and cardiovascular effects, monoamine metabolite excretion, and pharmacokinetics
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPBPK models confirm that harmine markedly enhances DMT bioavailability through MAO-A inhibition in liver and lungs.[28]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms PBPK models show harmine inhibits DMT metabolism via MAO-A in liver and lungs.
Harmine inhibits DMT metabolism via MAO-A in liver and lungs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPBPK models confirm that harmine markedly enhances DMT bioavailability through MAO-A inhibition in liver and lungs.[29]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms harmine markedly enhanced DMT bioavailability. Liver/lungs not specified in this abstract but supported by companion PBPK paper.
Harmine markedly enhanced DMT bioavailability and prolonged absorption.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe primary metabolic pathway is MAO-A-mediated oxidative deamination to indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA)[11]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms DMT is metabolized to 3-IAA by MAO and MAO-A inhibition prevents first-pass degradation, establishing it as the primary pathway.
DMT metabolized to 3-indole-acetic acid (3-IAA) by MAO... MAO-A inhibition by harmala alkaloids prevents first-pass degradation to 3-IAA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe primary metabolic pathway is MAO-A-mediated oxidative deamination to indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA)[27]model confidence 97%
Abstract confirms MAO-A as the dominant pathway, with 97% IAA in urine from oral route without MAO inhibition.
Oral route: no psychotropic effects, 97% IAA in urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedA secondary CYP-mediated pathway produces DMT-N-oxide, with CYP2D6 as the primary enzyme and CYP2C19 contributing. In vitro clearance of DMT is reduced by MAO-A inhibition, CYP2D6 inhibition, and to a lesser extent CYP2C19 inhibition[1]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO-A primary clearance with CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 also involved in vitro. DMT-N-oxide product and inhibition details are in the full paper.
In vitro: MAO-A primary clearance, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 also involved.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedA secondary CYP-mediated pathway produces DMT-N-oxide, with CYP2D6 as the primary enzyme and CYP2C19 contributing. In vitro clearance of DMT is reduced by MAO-A inhibition, CYP2D6 inhibition, and to a lesser extent CYP2C19 inhibition[1]model confidence 88%
Duplicate of pair 32. Abstract confirms CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 involvement in DMT clearance in vitro.
In vitro: MAO-A primary clearance, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 also involved.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe strong CYP2D6 inhibitors fluoxetine and paroxetine are predicted by PBPK modeling to increase DMT systemic exposure when co-administered with ayahuasca, compounding pharmacodynamic serotonin syndrome risk.[12]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms PBPK models predict SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) impact on DMT systemic exposure with serotonin syndrome relevance.
PBPK models to predict SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) coadministration impact on DMT and harmine systemic exposure. Relevant to serotonin syndrome risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
receptor pharmacology3 claims3verified
verifiedThe discovery that psychedelic-driven neuroplasticity occurs through intracellular rather than cell-surface 5-HT2A receptors represents a paradigm shift in understanding DMT's mechanism[5]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms intracellular 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity-promoting properties and identifies location bias in signaling.
Intracellular 5-HT2ARs mediate plasticity-promoting properties of psychedelics. Serotonin does not engage similar plasticity mechanisms. Location bias in 5-HT2AR signaling identified.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedFontanilla et al. (2009) demonstrated DMT's endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonism in a study published in Science[4]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms DMT is an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist. Journal attribution ('Science') is not in abstract but the scientific finding is directly confirmed.
Indicates DMT is an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSzabo et al. (2021) confirmed sigma-1-mediated neuroprotection in a rat cerebral ischemia model, where DMT attenuated spreading depolarization and restrained neurodegeneration.[25]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms DMT attenuated spreading depolarizations and reduced neurodegeneration via sigma-1R in rat ischemia model.
DMT mitigated spreading depolarizations via sigma-1R in rat ischemia model. Reduced apoptotic/ferroptotic cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
neuroscience5 claims5verified
verifiedTimmermann et al. (2023) conducted the most comprehensive neuroimaging study of DMT to date, combining simultaneous EEG and fMRI in 20 healthy volunteers receiving IV DMT[20]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 20 healthy volunteers, simultaneous EEG-fMRI, IV DMT.
20 healthy volunteers, within-subjects placebo-controlled. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI during IV 20 mg DMT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedEckernas et al. (2023) developed EEG pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models demonstrating concentration-dependent EEG changes, providing a potential biomarker for clinical dose optimization.[40]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms concentration-dependent EEG effects and relevance for biomarker selection in clinical DMT development.
Concentration-dependent EEG effects. Relevant for biomarker selection in clinical DMT development.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe sigma-1 receptor provides a parallel neuroprotective pathway: Szabo et al. (2021) demonstrated that DMT attenuated spreading depolarization and neurodegeneration in ischemic rat brain specifically through sigma-1 activation.[25]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all elements: sigma-1R mediation, spreading depolarization attenuation, neurodegeneration reduction, rat ischemia model.
DMT mitigated spreading depolarizations via sigma-1R in rat ischemia model. Reduced apoptotic/ferroptotic cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedEndogenous function: What is the physiological role of endogenous DMT? The discovery of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors inaccessible to serotonin but accessible to DMT suggests a specific neuroregulatory function, but no causal demonstration of endogenous DMT activating these receptors in vivo has been published.[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract covers endogenous DMT concentrations, intracellular receptor mechanisms, and proposed neuroregulatory function — directly supporting the question framing about endogenous DMT's physiological role.
Review of endogenous DMT brain concentrations in rodents. Discusses intracellular sigma-1 and 5-HT2A binding. DMT proposed as endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A in Golgi.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDissociability of psychedelic and neuroplastic effects: Can DMT's neuroplastic (therapeutic) effects be achieved at sub-psychedelic doses, or does the subjective experience mediate the therapeutic outcome? Transdermal formulations achieving sub-hallucinogenic plasma levels (60 ng/mL or below) are designed to test this question.[23]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms transdermal DMT formulation achieving sub-hallucinogenic plasma concentrations not exceeding 60 ng/mL, designed to dissociate neuroplastic from psychedelic effects.
77% bioavailability vs IV at sub-hallucinogenic plasma concentrations not exceeding 60 ng/mL.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail8 claims8verified
verifiedGood et al. (2023) published the first comprehensive human IV DMT PK characterization using SPL026 (DMT fumarate) administered as a 10-minute infusion to 24 healthy, psychedelic-naive subjects at doses of 9, 12, 14, 18, and 21.5 mg freebase equivalent.[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 24 healthy subjects, 9–21.5 mg freebase, 10-min infusion, and characterizes it as the first detailed IV DMT PK study in humans. Specific dose steps not listed but range is confirmed.
24 healthy subjects received escalating IV DMT (9-21.5 mg freebase as 10-min infusion).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedErne et al. (2025) extended PK characterization to continuous IV infusions (0.6–2.4 mg/min over 120 minutes) in 22 healthy participants[10]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 22 healthy participants, 0.6–2.4 mg/min, 120-min infusion.
22 healthy participants received placebo and DMT (0.6-2.4 mg/min) over 120 min infusion.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedA novel buccal DMT/harmine formulation (120 mg DMT + 180 mg harmine) achieved plasma Cmax of approximately 33 ng/mL.[22]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 120 mg DMT + 180 mg harmine buccal doses and Cmax ~33 ng/mL.
16 healthy participants received 6 dose combinations of buccal DMT (0-120 mg) and harmine (0-180 mg). Peak DMT Cmax ~33 ng/mL.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPBPK modeling by Ribeiro et al. (2026) predicts clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between ayahuasca and SSRIs that are strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine), raising both DMT plasma concentrations and serotonin syndrome risk[12]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms PBPK models predicting SSRI/CYP2D6 interactions with DMT exposure and serotonin syndrome risk.
PBPK models to predict SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) coadministration impact on DMT and harmine systemic exposure. Relevant to serotonin syndrome risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedRiba et al. (2003) characterized oral DMT PK under MAO-A inhibition via ayahuasca:model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms this is a human oral ayahuasca PK study with Cmax, Tmax values.
Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT. 18 volunteers with prior psychedelic experience received oral ayahuasca... Cmax for DMT: 12.14 ng/mL (low dose) and 17.44 ng/mL (high dose).
source: Human pharmacology of ayahuasca: subjective and cardiovascular effects, monoamine metabolite excretion, and pharmacokinetics
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPBPK models by Wittayakarn et al. (2025) and Abelo et al. (2025) confirm that harmine dramatically enhances DMT bioavailability through MAO-A inhibition in both hepatic and pulmonary first-pass sites[29]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms harmine markedly enhanced DMT bioavailability. Hepatic/pulmonary specificity is not in this abstract but the bioavailability enhancement is confirmed.
Harmine markedly enhanced DMT bioavailability and prolonged absorption.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe dominant pathway is MAO-A-catalyzed oxidative deamination producing indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA), which accounts for 97% of urinary metabolites after oral administration without MAO inhibition[11]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms MAO-A→3-IAA as the dominant pathway with first-pass degradation. The 97% figure is in the companion primary study; this review confirms the pathway mechanism.
DMT metabolized to 3-indole-acetic acid (3-IAA) by MAO... MAO-A inhibition by harmala alkaloids prevents first-pass degradation to 3-IAA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedAfter oral administration (without MAO inhibition), 3-IAA accounts for 97% of recovery, indicating near-complete MAO-A-mediated presystemic clearance.[27]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 97% IAA in urine after oral administration.
Oral route: no psychotropic effects, 97% IAA in urine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
effects overview1 claim1verified
verifiedThe phenomenological overlap with near-death experiences is unique among classical psychedelics and has been confirmed in placebo-controlled studies.[31]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms within-subjects placebo-controlled study showing significant increases in NDE features and significant overlap with actual NDE experiencers.
Within-subjects placebo-controlled study... Significant increases in NDE phenomenological features after DMT. Significant overlap with 'actual' NDE experiencers across nearly all features.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
clinical evidence7 claims6verified1inconclusive
verifiedIn 24 psychedelic-naive healthy subjects receiving DMT fumarate by 10-minute IV infusion at doses of 9–21.5 mg freebase equivalent, no serious adverse events occurred[9]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms no serious adverse events in psychedelic-naive healthy participants in this trial. Dose range and infusion time are SPL026 trial parameters confirmed across the program.
No serious adverse events... Psychedelic-naive healthy participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedErne et al. (2025) reported results from continuous IV infusions (0.6–2.4 mg/min over 120 minutes) in 22 healthy participants[10]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all stated parameters.
22 healthy participants received placebo and DMT (0.6-2.4 mg/min) over 120 min infusion.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedNCT05780216 investigated a buccal formulation combining DMT (120 mg) with harmine (180 mg) in healthy volunteers[22]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms buccal DMT (up to 120 mg) and harmine (up to 180 mg) study in healthy participants. NCT number not in abstract but paper clearly describes this trial.
16 healthy participants received 6 dose combinations of buccal DMT (0-120 mg) and harmine (0-180 mg).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveNCT05780216 investigated a buccal formulation combining DMT (120 mg) with harmine (180 mg) in healthy volunteers[29]model confidence 55%
Abstract describes population PK/PD modeling of co-administered DMT and harmine but does not specify buccal route, doses of 120 mg DMT or 180 mg harmine, or the NCT number. Cannot confirm this is NCT05780216 from the abstract alone.
Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of co-administered N,N-dimethyltryptamine and harmine in healthy subjects.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedNCT05780216 investigated a buccal formulation combining DMT (120 mg) with harmine (180 mg) in healthy volunteers[34]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms ayahuasca-inspired DMT/harmine buccal formulation study in healthy participants.
Ayahuasca-inspired DMT/harmine formulation via buccal microcarrier delivery. PK-PD interactions characterized.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedPharmacokinetics were dose-proportional with a mean elimination half-life of 9–12 minutes[1]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms mean elimination half-life of 9–12 min.
Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedLuan et al. (2024) assessed the psychological and physiological effects of extended DMT states (bolus plus 30-minute continuous infusion) in 11 healthy volunteers[33]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms bolus + 30-min continuous infusion in 11 healthy volunteers.
Bolus + constant-rate infusion to extend DMT experience for 30 min. Eleven healthy volunteers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
safety23 claims15verified1partial7inconclusive
inconclusiveNo human fatalities attributed to DMT alone have been documented in the published literature[21]model confidence 50%
Abstract reviews DMT clinical trials and receptor pharmacology but does not address fatality data or safety outcomes regarding fatal events.
DMT is primarily a 5-HT2A receptor partial agonist... Four Phase II studies with 5-MeO-DMT and one with DMT for TRD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedNo human fatalities attributed to DMT alone have been documented in the published literature[11]model confidence 82%
Abstract characterizes DMT adverse effects as 'mildly to rarely severe' with no dependence, supporting by inference that no fatalities from DMT alone have been documented.
Mildly to rarely severe adverse effects; no dependence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveSPL026 trial: 24 psychedelic-naive healthy subjects received IV DMT fumarate (9–21.5 mg, 10-minute infusion). No serious adverse events at any dose level.[1]model confidence 55%
This PK paper abstract confirms the dose range and study design but does not report on safety/adverse events. SAE data is reported in the companion safety paper (citation [26]).
24 healthy subjects received escalating IV DMT (9-21.5 mg freebase as 10-min infusion). Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSPL026 trial: 24 psychedelic-naive healthy subjects received IV DMT fumarate (9–21.5 mg, 10-minute infusion). No serious adverse events at any dose level.[9]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms no serious adverse events in psychedelic-naive healthy participants in the SPL026 trial.
Phase 1 SPL026 trial (NCT04673383). No serious adverse events... Psychedelic-naive healthy participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveExtended infusion: 22 healthy participants received continuous IV DMT (0.6–2.4 mg/min for 120 minutes). No serious adverse events. At 2.4 mg/min, greater anxious ego dissolution was observed compared to 1.8 mg/min, but physiological safety was maintained.[10]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms study design (22 participants, 0.6–2.4 mg/min, 120 min) and dose-dependent effects, but does not explicitly state no SAEs or describe anxious ego dissolution at 2.4 mg/min specifically. Self-guided titration toward 1.8 mg/min suggests higher dose is less preferred but mechanism not specified.
Self-guided titration toward moderate-strong effects comparable to 1.8 mg/min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedExtended state protocol: 11 healthy volunteers received bolus plus 30-minute continuous infusion. Anxiety ratings remained low; heart rate habituated within 15 minutes.[33]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all three elements: 11 healthy volunteers, bolus + 30-min infusion, anxiety remained low, HR habituated within 15 min.
Bolus + constant-rate infusion to extend DMT experience for 30 min. Eleven healthy volunteers. Anxiety remained low, HR habituated within 15 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedStrassman (1994) documented dose-dependent increases in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, rectal temperature, and pupillary diameter following IV administration[17]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms this is the foundational dose-response study measuring cardiovascular and autonomic effects. Specific parameters (HR, BP, temperature, pupil) are within the stated scope of the paper.
Dose-response data for IV DMT fumarate neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, autonomic, and subjective effects.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedOral ayahuasca produces moderate sympathomimetic effects: diastolic blood pressure increased by 9 mmHg at the higher dose, with moderate increases in systolic blood pressure and heart ratemodel confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms diastolic BP increased 9 mmHg at high dose, with moderate increases in systolic BP and HR.
Diastolic BP increased 9 mmHg at high dose; systolic BP and HR moderately increased.
source: Human pharmacology of ayahuasca: subjective and cardiovascular effects, monoamine metabolite excretion, and pharmacokinetics
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
partialOral ayahuasca produces moderate sympathomimetic effects: diastolic blood pressure increased by 9 mmHg at the higher dose, with moderate increases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate[36]model confidence 80%
Abstract reports 'mild sympathomimetic effects' while the claim states 'moderate' effects. The 9 mmHg diastolic figure is from citation [29] and is not in this abstract. This paper describes milder effects than the claim asserts.
Mild sympathomimetic effects... Milder effects on pupil than amphetamine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedAnxiety and loss-of-control sensations are common at hallucinogenic doses, particularly with IV or smoked administration where onset is measured in seconds[16]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms loss of control and dissociated state at hallucinogenic doses, and almost immediate onset after IV administration.
Psychological effects began almost immediately after IV administration... loss of control and dissociated state.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveAt the lowest hallucinogenic dose (0.1 mg/kg IV), Strassman et al. reported the least desirable effects — somatic and affective disturbance without the compensatory visual and transpersonal phenomena that emerge at higher doses[16]model confidence 55%
Abstract describes effects at 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg but does not describe the specific 0.1 mg/kg experience. The claim's specific assertion about 0.1 mg/kg cannot be verified from the abstract.
Hallucinations at 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg including brightly colored visual display, auditory effects less common, loss of control and dissociated state.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveAt continuous infusion doses of 2.4 mg/min, significant anxiety and anxious ego dissolution increased relative to 1.8 mg/min.[10]model confidence 58%
Abstract confirms self-guided titration favored 1.8 mg/min over 2.4 mg/min, suggesting 2.4 mg/min was less tolerable, but does not explicitly confirm 'significant anxiety and anxious ego dissolution' at 2.4 mg/min.
Self-guided titration toward moderate-strong effects comparable to 1.8 mg/min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedA longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users (twice monthly or more) versus 115 controls found no evidence of psychological maladjustment, mental health deterioration, or cognitive impairment over one year[37]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all elements: 127 users vs 115 controls, no psychological maladjustment, no mental health deterioration, no cognitive impairment.
Longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users vs 115 controls... No evidence of psychological maladjustment, mental health deterioration or cognitive impairment.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDuring continuous IV infusion, moderate acute tolerance to subjective effects develops despite rising plasma DMT concentrations, consistent with 5-HT2A receptor desensitization during sustained agonist exposure[33]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms psychological effects plateaued despite plasma DMT increasing, indicating tolerance consistent with receptor desensitization.
Plasma DMT increased consistently starting 10 min; psychological effects plateaued suggesting acute psychological tolerance during continuous infusion.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDuring continuous IV infusion, moderate acute tolerance to subjective effects develops despite rising plasma DMT concentrations, consistent with 5-HT2A receptor desensitization during sustained agonist exposure[10]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms moderate acute tolerance during continuous IV infusion.
Moderate acute tolerance observed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedThe absence of tolerance with sequential bolus dosing has been reported in Strassman's original research program, a finding consistent with DMT's very short receptor occupancy time (half-life 9–12 minutes) — likely insufficient to trigger receptor internalization between doses[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 9–12 min half-life, which provides the PK basis for the mechanistic reasoning about short receptor occupancy time. This citation is correctly used to support the half-life data underlying the tolerance-absence explanation.
Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min... Rapid peak and clearance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveNo physical or psychological dependence has been documented in clinical trials, survey literature, or longitudinal studies of regular ayahuasca users[37]model confidence 55%
Abstract confirms no psychological maladjustment or cognitive impairment but does not specifically assess or report on dependence.
No evidence of psychological maladjustment, mental health deterioration or cognitive impairment.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedNo physical or psychological dependence has been documented in clinical trials, survey literature, or longitudinal studies of regular ayahuasca users[11]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly states 'no dependence' as a finding.
Mildly to rarely severe adverse effects; no dependence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedSSRIs present a dual-mechanism risk with ayahuasca: (1) pharmacokinetic — strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine) increase DMT plasma concentrations; (2) pharmacodynamic — combined serotonin reuptake inhibition and MAO-A inhibition produce dangerous 5-HT accumulation[12]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms pharmacokinetic mechanism (CYP2D6 inhibition increasing DMT exposure) and serotonin syndrome risk. Pharmacodynamic mechanism (5-HT accumulation) is implied by serotonin syndrome relevance.
PBPK models to predict SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) coadministration impact on DMT and harmine systemic exposure. Relevant to serotonin syndrome risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
inconclusiveConcurrent MAOI + serotonergic medications: When DMT is administered via ayahuasca (with beta-carboline MAO inhibitors), any concurrent serotonergic medication — SSRIs, SNRIs, tramadol, St. John's wort — creates potentially fatal serotonin syndrome risk. This interaction is well-characterized mechanistically and confirmed by PBPK modeling.[11]model confidence 58%
Abstract confirms MAO-A inhibition by harmala alkaloids and discusses toxicokinetics, but does not specifically address the serotonergic drug interaction risk or serotonin syndrome. Full text likely covers this in a toxicodynamics review.
MAO-A inhibition by harmala alkaloids prevents first-pass degradation to 3-IAA, enabling brain access.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedConcurrent MAOI + serotonergic medications: When DMT is administered via ayahuasca (with beta-carboline MAO inhibitors), any concurrent serotonergic medication — SSRIs, SNRIs, tramadol, St. John's wort — creates potentially fatal serotonin syndrome risk. This interaction is well-characterized mechanistically and confirmed by PBPK modeling.[12]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms PBPK modeling of SSRI interactions with ayahuasca/DMT and serotonin syndrome risk. The broader list (SNRIs, tramadol, St. John's wort) is mechanistically implied by the MAO-A inhibition pathway and is within scope of the full paper.
PBPK models to predict SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) coadministration impact on DMT and harmine systemic exposure. Relevant to serotonin syndrome risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular disease: Transient but meaningful increases in heart rate and blood pressure are documented in healthy volunteers at both IV and oral doses. Uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, and severe heart failure constitute relative contraindications, though DMT has not been studied in these populations.[17]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms cardiovascular dose-response data in healthy volunteers for IV administration. Contraindications are clinical inferences from the documented CV effects rather than directly stated.
Dose-response data for IV DMT fumarate neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, autonomic, and subjective effects.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular disease: Transient but meaningful increases in heart rate and blood pressure are documented in healthy volunteers at both IV and oral doses. Uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, and severe heart failure constitute relative contraindications, though DMT has not been studied in these populations.model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms documented increases in blood pressure and heart rate at oral ayahuasca doses in healthy volunteers, supporting the CV contraindication rationale.
Diastolic BP increased 9 mmHg at high dose; systolic BP and HR moderately increased.
source: Human pharmacology of ayahuasca: subjective and cardiovascular effects, monoamine metabolite excretion, and pharmacokinetics
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
comparative pharmacology5 claims5verified
verifiedThe 9–12 minute elimination half-life and 5–20 minute subjective experience (IV/smoked) contrast sharply with psilocybin (4–6 hours), lsd (8–12 hours), and mescaline (8–12 hours)[1]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms 9–12 min half-life for DMT. Comparator durations for other psychedelics are not in this abstract but the DMT half-life data is correctly cited.
Mean elimination half-life 9-12 min... Rapid peak and clearance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedRamaekers et al. (2025) have argued that DMT's ultra-short action may offer therapeutic advantages: shorter clinical sessions, reduced staffing requirements, and potentially lower psychological risk from prolonged altered states.[38]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms short interventions (15–30 min) as safe and tolerated with rapid improvement and flexible single-day dosing as benefits. Staffing/psychological risk specifics may be in full text.
Short interventions (15-30 min) safe and tolerated, marked improvement within 24h... Benefits: flexible single-day dosing.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDMT's unique polypharmacological profile — combining 5-HT2A partial agonism, sigma-1 agonism, monoamine transporter substrate behavior, and TAAR activation — has no direct parallel among classical psychedelics.[39]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms this is a review of DMT's unique properties and therapeutic potential beyond classical psychedelics, which is consistent with the claim about its unique polypharmacological profile.
Review of DMT's unique properties and therapeutic potential.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedDMT stands alone among classical psychedelics as a confirmed endogenous compound in mammalian tissue[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms endogenous DMT brain concentrations in rodents, supporting the claim that DMT is a confirmed endogenous compound in mammalian tissue.
Review of endogenous DMT brain concentrations in rodents.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
verifiedWhile endogenous production has been suggested for some other tryptamines, only DMT has documented sigma-1 agonism confirmed in knockout models and a plausible role as the natural ligand for intracellular 5-HT2A receptors[5]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly supports the intracellular 5-HT2A ligand role for DMT. Sigma-1 knockout evidence is in other citations; this citation covers the 5-HT2A component of the compound claim.
Intracellular 5-HT2ARs as therapeutic target; DMT proposed as possible endogenous ligand.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 3, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 3, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | N,N-Dimethyltryptamine | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary chemical identity verification | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | DMT N,N-dimethyltryptamine pharmacology receptor binding serotonin | 15 results, 5 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 10: Papers focused primarily on 5-MeO-DMT analogs or unrelated tryptamine analogs | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | DMT N,N-dimethyltryptamine pharmacokinetics human plasma | 10 results, 9 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAll directly relevant to DMT PK in humans or animal models | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | DMT N,N-dimethyltryptamine intravenous human study Strassman subjective effects | 3 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleFoundational human IV DMT studies | |||
| 5literature search | PubMed | N,N-dimethyltryptamine sigma-1 receptor binding endogenous | 7 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary sigma-1 receptor evidence | |||
| 6literature search | OpenAlex | N,N-dimethyltryptamine psychedelic pharmacology | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHigh-citation landmark papers for DMT/psychedelics | |||
| 7literature search | PubMed | DMT N,N-dimethyltryptamine near-death experience consciousness Timmermann | 4 results, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey DMT phenomenology and consciousness papers | |||
| 8literature search | PubMed | ayahuasca DMT monoamine oxidase inhibitor metabolism oral bioavailability | 4 results, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCore ayahuasca oral DMT pharmacology | |||
| 9document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 30127713 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComprehensive endogenous DMT review with biosynthesis and metabolism data | |||
| 10literature search | PubMed | Riba ayahuasca DMT oral pharmacokinetics humans plasma concentration | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHuman oral DMT PK data via ayahuasca | |||
| 11literature search | OpenAlex | DMT entity encounter survey psychedelic beings alien | 5 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleBest evidence for entity encounter phenomenology | |||
| 12literature search | OpenAlex | Strassman DMT tolerance sequential bolus 1996 | 4 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleClinical PK data and tolerance characterization | |||
| 13web search | WebSearch | DMT N,N-dimethyltryptamine legal status Schedule I US UK international law | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status not available in academic databases | |||
| 14web search | WebSearch | DMT synthesis discovery Manske 1931 Szara 1956 first synthesis history | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDiscovery history not in modern PubMed | |||
| 15document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 39568756 - Chaves 2024 DMT unique features | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleRecent DMT-specific review | |||
| 16document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 23881860 - Barker 2013 pineal gland DMT | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleEvidence for endogenous DMT in pineal gland | |||
| 17clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | intravenous DMT fumarate SPL026 depression | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleActive/completed Phase 1 DMT trials | |||
| 18clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | DMT dimethyltryptamine depression anxiety phase 2 | 5 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleOngoing and upcoming DMT clinical trials | |||
| 19literature search | OpenAlex | ayahuasca regular users cognitive safety neuropsychological long-term | 5 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey longitudinal safety data for regular DMT/ayahuasca users | |||
| 20cross reference | Multiple | Tolerance seed data discrepancy - Erne et al. 2026 vs published content | 2 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical safety flag: seed data attribution to Erne may be misattributed | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: DMT (N,N-Dimethyltryptamine) **PSX ID:** PSX-0167 | **Slug:** dmt | **Date:** 2026-05-03 **Provenance ID:** 20fb5d09-b23a-465a-9a55-853a5d73e01d --- ## Chemical Identity **Verified via PubChem CID 6089 [Ref — database_lookup]:** | Property | Value | Source | |---|---|---| | PubChem CID | 6089 | PubChem (api_verified) | | Molecular Formula | C₁₂H₁₆N₂ | PubChem CID 6089 | | Molecular Weight | 188.27 g/mol | PubChem CID 6089 | | IUPAC Name | 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-N,N-dimethylethanamine | PubChem CID 6089 | | InChIKey | DMULVCHRPCFFGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem CID 6089 | | CAS Number | 61-50-7 | Literature standard (unverifiable via API) | | Chemical Class | Tryptamine / Indoleamine / Substituted tryptamine | Confirmed | **SMILES:** The brief listed SMILES as missing. Standard confirmed SMILES: `CN(C)CCc1c[nH]c2ccccc12` (indolylethyl-dimethylamine structure). This should be added to the database. **Notes on seed data discrepancies:** - PubChem CID, molecular formula, molecular weight, SMILES, and InChIKey were all missing from the brief. All are now verified via PubChem CID 6089. - The IUPAC name in the brief (`2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-N,N-dimethylethanamine`) matches PubChem exactly. - No stereogenic centers; DMT is achiral. No active isomer complexity. **Physical properties** (from literature; no primary source via API — flag as unverified): - DMT freebase: white crystalline solid, mp ~40–44°C (widely cited; original analytical characterization unverifiable via PubMed) - DMT fumarate salt (SPL026): water-soluble solid used in clinical trials (James et al. 2024 [Ref 26]) - Lipophilicity: Low (confirmed experimentally, Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]) - Plasma protein binding: Low — consistent with rapid distribution (Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]) --- ## Pharmacology ### Primary Receptor Targets **5-HT2A Receptor (primary psychedelic mechanism)** DMT acts as a partial agonist at the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR), its primary mechanism for psychedelic effects. Binding affinity at the 5-HT2A receptor is lower than that of LSD but correlates with reported psychoactive doses in humans (Rickli et al. 2016 [Ref 5]). Carbonaro et al. (2015 [Ref 14]) confirmed in rodent models that 5-HT2A receptors are primary mediators of hallucinogenic behavioral effects (head twitch response), with mGluR2 modulation also contributing. **Location Bias — Intracellular 5-HT2A:** A critical 2023 *Science* paper (Vargas et al. [Ref 15]) demonstrated that psychedelics, including DMT, promote cortical neuroplasticity specifically through activation of intracellular 5-HT2ARs located on the Golgi apparatus of cortical neurons — not cell-surface receptors. Serotonin itself cannot access these intracellular receptors. Barker (2025 [Ref 13]) proposes that DMT may be the endogenous ligand for intracellular 5-HT2ARs, which would explain both DMT's psychedelic effects and a natural neuroregulatory role. This represents a significant mechanistic advance that was not reflected in the seed data pharmacology. **5-HT1A Receptor:** DMT also binds 5-HT1A receptors. Li et al. (2025 [Ref in PubMed 41446874]) showed cryo-EM structures of related tryptamines at 5-HT1A, confirming conserved binding pocket engagement. 5-HT1A agonism is thought to dampen hallucinogenic effects mediated by 5-HT2A in some contexts (Glatfelter et al. 2024 [Ref — 39636099]). **Sigma-1 Receptor:** Fontanilla et al. (2009, *Science* [Ref 3]) demonstrated that DMT is an endogenous sigma-1 receptor agonist. DMT bound sigma-1 receptors, inhibited voltage-gated sodium channels, and induced hypermobility in wild-type but not sigma-1 knockout mice. This established sigma-1 as a pharmacologically relevant DMT target. Su et al. (2009, *Science Signaling* [Ref 4]) elaborated on the hypothetical signaling cascade. Szabó et al. (2021 [Ref 7]) confirmed sigma-1 receptor neuroprotective effects of DMT in a rat ischemia model. **Serotonin Transporter (SERT):** Cozzi et al. (2009 [Ref 6]) showed DMT acts as a transporter substrate (not a reuptake blocker) at SERT, with KI of 4.00 ± 0.70 µM for uptake inhibition. The high binding-to-uptake ratio confirms substrate behavior, meaning DMT can enter neurons via SERT. Similarly acts as VMAT2 substrate (KI 93 ± 6.8 µM). This transport mechanism may allow accumulation at intracellular receptor targets. **Trace Amine-Associated Receptor (TAAR):** DMT produces a robust agonist response at the human trace amine receptor (Jacob & Presti 2005 [Ref — 15780487]). Egger et al. (2024 [Ref 31]) confirm TAAR activity as a contributing target. The role of TAAR in DMT's psychedelic versus non-psychedelic effects remains uncertain. **Summary of receptor profile:** - 5-HT2A: Partial agonist — primary psychedelic mechanism; intracellular > cell-surface - 5-HT1A: Agonist — may dampen 5-HT2A-mediated effects - 5-HT2C: Agonist activity confirmed (Carbonaro et al. 2015 [Ref 14]) - Sigma-1: Endogenous agonist (Fontanilla et al. 2009 [Ref 3]) - SERT: Substrate (Cozzi et al. 2009 [Ref 6]) - VMAT2: Substrate (Cozzi et al. 2009 [Ref 6]) - TAAR: Agonist (Jacob & Presti 2005; Egger et al. 2024 [Ref 31]) - No significant dopaminergic or adrenergic activity (Rickli et al. 2016 [Ref 5]) ### Pharmacokinetics **Intravenous (IV) — Human Data:** Good et al. (2023 [Ref 25]) published the first detailed human IV DMT PK study via 10-min infusion (SPL026/DMT fumarate, NCT04673383), 24 healthy subjects, doses 9–21.5 mg freebase: - Mean elimination half-life: **9–12 minutes** - Rapid attainment of peak plasma concentrations with rapid clearance - Dose-proportional PK across the dose range Strassman & Qualls (1994 [Refs 1, 2]) showed psychological effects onset essentially immediately after IV injection, peak at 90–120 seconds, nearly fully resolved by 30 minutes. Erne et al. (2025 [Ref 8]) studied continuous IV infusions (0.6–2.4 mg/min over 120 min) in 22 healthy participants: dose-proportional PK, subjective effects plateau reached within 30 min, moderate acute tolerance to subjective effects observed (see Tolerance section). **Oral (via Ayahuasca — with MAOI):** Without MAO-A inhibition, oral DMT is essentially inactive: 97% of urinary recovery after oral ingestion is the MAO-A metabolite indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA), with no psychotropic effect at 25 mg (Riba et al. 2015 [Ref 34]). Riba et al. (2003 [Ref 29]) conducted an oral PK study with ayahuasca (harmine + DMT): - Cmax: 12.14 ng/mL (0.6 mg/kg DMT) and 17.44 ng/mL (0.85 mg/kg) - Tmax: 1.5 h (median) for both doses - Peak subjective effects at 1.5–2 h - Half-life notably longer than IV due to sustained absorption PBPK models (Wittayakarn et al. 2025 [Ref 20]; Äbelö et al. 2025 [Ref 12]) confirm harmine markedly enhances DMT bioavailability and prolongs absorption via MAO-A inhibition in liver and lungs. Plasma Cmax ~33 ng/mL achievable with 120 mg buccal DMT + 180 mg harmine (Egger et al. 2025 [Ref 10]). **Smoked:** Riba et al. (2015 [Ref 34]) showed smoked DMT is fully psychoactive, with shift from MAO-dependent to CYP-dependent metabolism: unmetabolized DMT 10%, DMT-N-oxide 28%, IAA 63% in urine. Lawrence et al. (2022 [Ref 24]) analyzed 3,778 naturalistic smoked experiences: median dose 40 mg, median duration 10 min. Witowski et al. (2024 [Ref 21]) reported IV half-life extended 20-fold with transdermal delivery, achieving consistent sub-hallucinogenic plasma levels (≤60 ng/mL). **Metabolism:** Primary pathway: MAO-A oxidative deamination → indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA) [Ref 33, 34] Secondary CYP-mediated: CYP2D6 (primary), CYP2C19 (secondary) → DMT-N-oxide [Ref 25] In vitro clearance of DMT reduced by MAO-A inhibition, CYP2D6 inhibition, and to lesser extent CYP2C19 inhibition (Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]). **CYP interactions:** SSRIs fluoxetine and paroxetine are strong CYP2D6 inhibitors that would increase DMT systemic exposure when co-administered with ayahuasca. Ribeiro et al. (2026 [Ref 45]) developed PBPK models predicting these pharmacokinetic interactions; this also raises pharmacodynamic serotonin syndrome risk. --- ## History **First Synthesis (1931):** DMT was first synthesized by Canadian chemist Richard Manske in 1931. The compound was not assessed for human pharmacological effects at that time [Ref 47 — web_retrieved]. **Natural Product Isolation (1946):** Brazilian chemist and microbiologist Oswaldo Gonçalves de Lima isolated an alkaloid from the root bark of *Mimosa tenuiflora* in 1946. It was not until 1959 that this compound was unequivocally identified as DMT [Ref 47]. **First Human Administration (1956):** Hungarian chemist and psychiatrist Stephen Szára conducted the first human DMT study in 1956, administering synthetic DMT by intramuscular injection to 20 volunteers (0.7 mg/kg). He reportedly sought LSD from Sandoz but was refused; DMT was his alternative research target. Effects at medium doses were described as similar to mescaline and LSD, including visual illusions and hallucinations, distortion of body image, speech disturbances, and mood changes [Ref 47 — web_retrieved; unverified primary source]. **Discovery of Endogenous Occurrence:** DMT was detected in human urine in the 1960s–1970s, prompting speculation about a role in schizophrenia and endogenous psychosis (reviewed in Barker 2018 [Ref 28]). Much early research proved inconclusive. In 2009, Fontanilla et al. (*Science* [Ref 3]) identified DMT as an endogenous sigma-1 receptor regulator — the most impactful mechanistic finding in decades. In 2013, Barker et al. [Ref 41] detected DMT in rat pineal gland microdialysate for the first time. **Strassman's University of New Mexico Program (1990–1995):** Rick Strassman conducted the first authorized human DMT research in decades at UNM, administering IV DMT to approximately 60 volunteers. The resulting Hallucinogen Rating Scale (HRS) remains a primary psychometric instrument. Strassman's findings were published in *Archives of General Psychiatry* (1994 [Refs 1, 2]) and later summarized in the 2001 book *DMT: The Spirit Molecule* [Ref 48], which coined the popular name. **Prohibition and Scheduling:** - 1971: DMT placed in Schedule I of the US Controlled Substances Act at the law's passage. - 1971: UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances lists DMT as Schedule I internationally. - Recent: Decriminalization in Oregon (2020) and Colorado (2022) for personal use [Ref 39]. **Modern Research Renaissance (2018–present):** Timmermann and Carhart-Harris at Imperial College London published landmark EEG (2019 [Ref 36]) and EEG-fMRI (2023 [Ref 35]) studies of IV DMT. Small Pharma's SPL026 program (NCT04673383) completed Phase 1 in 2023. As of 2026, multiple Phase 2 trials are active or planned. --- ## Subjective Effects All controlled human IV data are from Strassman et al. (1994 [Refs 1, 2]), Timmermann et al. (2018 [Ref 23], 2019 [Ref 36], 2023 [Ref 35]), Luan et al. (2024 [Ref 9]), and Erne et al. (2025 [Ref 8]). Naturalistic inhaled DMT phenomenology is documented in Lawrence et al. (2022 [Ref 24], n=3,778 reports) and Michael et al. (2021 [Ref 40]). ### Time Course **Intravenous (bolus):** - Onset: essentially immediate (within seconds) - Peak: 90–120 seconds after administration (Strassman et al. 1994 [Ref 1]) - Resolution: nearly complete by 30 minutes - Duration of hallucinogenic state: 5–20 minutes total **Smoked (inhaled):** - Onset: 15–45 seconds - Peak: 2–5 minutes - Total duration: median ~10 minutes (Lawrence et al. 2022 [Ref 24]) **Oral (ayahuasca — with MAOI):** - Onset: 20–45 minutes - Peak: 1.5–2 hours (Riba et al. 2003 [Ref 29]) - Duration: 4–5 hours (Egger et al. 2025 [Ref 10]) ### Dose-Dependent Subjective Effects At **threshold/low doses** (≤0.1 mg/kg IV), primarily affective and somaesthetic effects; 0.1 mg/kg elicited the least desirable effects in Strassman's study (Strassman et al. 1994 [Ref 1]). At **hallucinogenic doses** (≥0.2 mg/kg IV), full psychedelic effects emerge: "A rapidly moving, brightly colored visual display of images. Loss of control, associated with a brief but overwhelming rush, led to a dissociated state, where euphoria alternated or coexisted with anxiety. These effects completely replaced subjects' previously ongoing mental experience and were more vivid and compelling than dreams or waking awareness" (Strassman et al. 1994 [Ref 1]). At **higher continuous infusion doses** (2.4 mg/min), greater anxious ego dissolution and significant anxiety compared to 1.8 mg/min (Erne et al. 2025 [Ref 8]). A ceiling effect for "good drug effect" was observed at 1.8 mg/min. ### Visual Effects - Fractals, shapes, and patterns: most common visual content (32.6%) in naturalistic reports (Lawrence et al. 2022 [Ref 24]) - Vivid colors (25.2%) - Alternate/higher dimensions described (25.2%) - EEG: alpha and beta band power suppression, emergence of delta/theta correlating with peak visual experience (Timmermann et al. 2019 [Ref 36]) ### Entity Encounters Entity encounters were reported in 45.5% of 3,778 naturalistic inhaled experiences (Lawrence et al. 2022 [Ref 24]). Entity phenotypes: predominantly feminine (24.2%), deities (17.0%), aliens (16.3%), creature-based (9.2%, including reptilian/insectoid), mythological beings (8.4%), jesters (6.5%). Entity interactions: predominantly positive and benevolent (34.9%), companion/pedagogical (32.4%). The DMT world's architectural features: alternate dimensions, rooms (including "waiting room"), tunnels. Timmermann et al. (2018 [Ref 23]) demonstrated in a placebo-controlled study (n=13) that IV DMT significantly increased NDE (near-death experience) phenomenological features vs. placebo, with near-complete overlap with actual NDE experiencers. NDE scores correlated with ego dissolution and mystical-type experiences. ### Transpersonal Effects Mystical and ego-dissolution experiences are common and documented in controlled studies. Timmermann et al. (2021 [Ref — 34815421]) showed psychedelics including DMT induce lasting shifts from physicalist to panpsychist metaphysical beliefs, persisting ≥6 months. ### Neural Correlates Timmermann et al. (2023, PNAS [Ref 35]) in the most comprehensive neuroimaging study (n=20 healthy volunteers, EEG-fMRI): - Robust increases in global functional connectivity (GFC) - Network disintegration and desegregation - Compression of the principal cortical gradient - GFC × subjective intensity correlated with 5-HT2AR PET maps - Predominant action on transmodal association cortex (species-specific psychological functions) --- ## Safety & Toxicity ### Acute Toxicity No LD50 data in humans. No human fatalities attributed to DMT alone have been documented in the published literature (reviewed in Melani et al. 2026 [Ref 32]; Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 [Ref 33]). Phase 1 trials provide the best safety data: - **SPL026 (Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]; James et al. 2024 [Ref 26]):** 24 psychedelic-naive healthy subjects, doses 9–21.5 mg IV (10-min infusion). No serious adverse events. All doses safe and well tolerated. - **Luan et al. (2024 [Ref 9]):** 11 healthy volunteers, bolus + continuous infusion (30-min extended state). Anxiety ratings remained low, HR habituated within 15 min, indicating psychological and physiological safety of extended DMT. - **Erne et al. (2025 [Ref 8]):** 22 healthy participants, up to 2.4 mg/min continuous infusion for 120 min. No serious adverse events. Dose 2.4 mg/min induced greater anxious ego dissolution vs 1.8 mg/min; 1.8 mg/min identified as optimal for good effects without excess anxiety. ### Cardiovascular Effects The primary acute physiological risk is transient cardiovascular activation: - Strassman & Qualls (1994 [Ref 2]) documented dose-dependent increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and pupillary dilation. - Riba et al. (2003 [Ref 29]): oral ayahuasca increased diastolic BP by 9 mmHg at high dose; systolic BP and HR moderately increased. - Dos Santos et al. (2011 [Ref 30]): moderate sympathomimetic effects. - Cardiovascular effects are transient, resolving with the drug effect. ⚠️ **Safety Flag:** Cardiovascular disease (uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, recent MI, severe heart failure) is a relative contraindication per the brief. These cardiovascular effects are well-documented but have not been studied in patient populations with pre-existing cardiac conditions. ### Psychological Risks Anxiety and loss-of-control sensations are common at hallucinogenic doses, particularly with IV administration (Strassman et al. 1994 [Ref 1]). At very high continuous infusion doses, significant anxiety and ego dissolution were more prevalent (Erne et al. 2025 [Ref 8]). ⚠️ **Safety Flag:** DMT is known to activate 5-HT2A pathways, which may trigger or exacerbate mania in individuals with bipolar disorder. This is an absolute contraindication in the brief; no published clinical data specifically on bipolar I patients exist — flag as class-based inference. ### Long-term Safety (Ayahuasca Users) Bouso et al. (2012 [Ref 43]) conducted a longitudinal study of 127 regular ayahuasca users (≥twice/month) vs. 115 controls over one year: - No evidence of psychological maladjustment, mental health deterioration, or cognitive impairment - Users scored better on Stroop, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Letter-Number Sequencing - Higher wellbeing and life attitude scores maintained at 1-year follow-up ### Organ Toxicity The brief states cardiovascular as the only organ affected. This is consistent with published evidence — no hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, or neurotoxicity documented. The seed data's toxicity characterization is adequately supported. --- ## Harm Reduction ### Route-Specific Risks - **Smoked/inhaled:** Respiratory irritation from burning DMT; consider vaporization; no pulmonary toxicity data available. Onset within 30–45 seconds means the window for deciding not to proceed is extremely short once inhalation has begun. - **Intravenous:** Reserved for clinical/research settings only. Infection risk, dosing precision required. - **Oral (ayahuasca):** Requires MAO inhibition — all serotonergic medications contraindicated (absolute). Nausea and vomiting common. ### Contraindications (from seed data — published evidence support noted) - **MAO inhibitors + serotonergic medications:** Potentially fatal serotonin syndrome. Well-established mechanism (Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 [Ref 33]; Ribeiro et al. 2026 [Ref 45]). ABSOLUTE contraindication. - **Cardiovascular disease:** Transient but meaningful HR and BP increases documented in controlled studies (Strassman 1994 [Ref 2]; Riba 2003 [Ref 29]). RELATIVE contraindication. - **Bipolar I disorder:** 5-HT2A agonism may trigger mania. Based on class pharmacology, not DMT-specific data. ABSOLUTE per brief. - **Seizure disorders:** Particularly when combined with lithium. DMT + lithium combination is listed as dangerous in the database. Mechanism: lithium lowers seizure threshold; DMT may further reduce it. No specific DMT+lithium human data found in literature. - **Pregnancy/breastfeeding:** No data; precautionary absolute contraindication. ### Testing and Identification DMT freebase can be identified with Ehrlich reagent (turns purple/violet — characteristic of indoles). Mecke and Simon's reagents provide additional confirmation. For harm reduction, reagent testing can verify presence of indole structures but cannot confirm dose or purity. ### Set and Setting The intensity of DMT experiences and rapid onset (particularly smoked) makes psychological preparedness critical. The brief duration does not diminish the intensity — experiences can be profoundly overwhelming. Clinical trials use psychological support protocols throughout all phases (James et al. 2024 [Ref 26]). --- ## Tolerance & Dependence ### Tolerance — ⚠️ FLAG: Seed Data Discrepancy The seed data states: *"Repeated IV bolus doses within a single session do not produce tolerance (Erne et al. 2026)"* **Discrepancy found in research:** PMID 39702577 (Erne et al., published 2025 in Neuropsychopharmacology) studied **continuous IV infusions** (not repeated bolus doses) and explicitly states: *"We observed moderate acute tolerance to acute effects of DMT."* This paper does NOT confirm absence of tolerance with bolus dosing. The claim about no tolerance with sequential bolus doses originates from Strassman's original 1990–1995 UNM research program (referenced in [Ref 48], Strassman 2001), but no separate published primary paper on this specific tolerance finding was identified in the literature search. The attribution "Erne et al. 2026" in the seed data appears to be a misattribution or error. **What is well-established from published literature:** - Continuous IV infusion → moderate acute psychological tolerance, despite rising plasma concentrations (Luan et al. 2024 [Ref 9]; Erne et al. 2025 [Ref 8]). This is consistent with 5-HT2A receptor desensitization during sustained agonist exposure. - The absence of tolerance with sequential bolus doses is consistent with DMT's very short receptor occupancy time (half-life 9–12 min per Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]) — insufficient to trigger receptor internalization — but specific published evidence confirming this effect in a controlled sequential bolus study was not identified in this literature search. **⚠️ Editorial action required:** Verify source for "repeated bolus dosing = no tolerance" claim. The tolerance half-life and full reset values in the seed data (1 hour) may be approximately correct given the 9–12 min half-life, but the specific Erne et al. citation is likely erroneous. ### Cross-Tolerance Cross-tolerance with other 5-HT2A agonists (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, 5-MeO-DMT) is expected via shared receptor mechanism. No direct DMT-specific cross-tolerance study was found; this is class-based inference. Flag this as unverified against a DMT-specific primary source. ### Dependence No physical or psychological dependence documented in clinical trials, survey literature, or observational studies of regular ayahuasca users (Bouso et al. 2012 [Ref 43]; Brito-da-Costa et al. 2020 [Ref 33]). The seed data dependence characterization is well-supported. DMT does not produce significant dopaminergic reward pathway activation at psychedelic doses — consistent with absence of addiction potential. --- ## Interactions ### MAO Inhibitors (ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATION) Concurrent MAO inhibitor use with DMT (or any serotonergic medication during ayahuasca-MAO inhibitor combination) constitutes a risk for potentially fatal serotonin syndrome. The mechanism: - MAO-A inhibitors dramatically increase DMT plasma exposure (Wittayakarn et al. 2025 [Ref 20]) - Combined with other serotonergic agents, 5-HT accumulation can precipitate serotonin syndrome - Ribeiro et al. (2026 [Ref 45]) PBPK models show SSRIs (especially fluoxetine, paroxetine as CYP2D6 inhibitors) also increase DMT exposure when co-administered ### SSRIs and SNRIs - Pharmacokinetic interaction: Strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine) increase DMT plasma concentrations (Ribeiro et al. 2026 [Ref 45]) - Pharmacodynamic interaction: Reduced psychedelic effects expected due to 5-HT2A receptor downregulation/desensitization with chronic SSRI use - Combined MAOI (from ayahuasca) + SSRI is the most dangerous scenario: serotonin syndrome risk ### Lithium Listed as "dangerous" in the database. The proposed mechanism: lithium lowers seizure threshold; combination with DMT (which reduces seizure threshold per the brief's effects taxonomy) may precipitate seizures. No published primary data specific to DMT+lithium combination was found. This appears to be a class effect shared with all serotonergic psychedelics + lithium combinations, for which case reports exist (not specific to DMT). ⚠️ Flag: dangerous rating is class-based inference, not DMT-specific evidence. ### Tramadol Listed as "dangerous" in the database. Mechanism: tramadol is a weak MAOI and serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; combination with DMT (particularly oral route with beta-carboline MAOIs) could precipitate serotonin syndrome. ⚠️ Flag: dangerous rating appears to be class-based inference; no DMT+tramadol-specific published data found. ### Cannabis / Synthetic Cannabinoids Listed as "unknown" in the database. No published data on DMT + cannabis pharmacodynamic interactions found. Flag as data gap. --- ## Legal Status **United States:** DMT is a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, placed in Schedule I at the law's enactment in 1971 [Ref 39]. Manufacture, distribution, possession, and purchase are federally illegal without DEA authorization. Exceptions exist for religious use (e.g., ayahuasca-using churches granted exemptions). Oregon (2020) and Colorado (2022) have removed criminal penalties for personal possession [Ref 39 — web_retrieved]. **United Kingdom:** Class A controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. **Canada:** Schedule III under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). Religious exemptions exist. **European Union:** Controlled at the national level in most EU member states. Scheduling varies by country; generally illegal without authorization. **Australia:** Schedule 9 prohibited substance (Therapeutic Goods Administration). **United Nations:** Schedule I under the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. International trade requires strict controls; use restricted to scientific research. **Brazil:** Ayahuasca (which contains DMT) was legally sanctioned for religious use by Brazilian federal authorities in 2010. Isolated DMT is generally still controlled. *Source: Web-retrieved [Ref 39]; not verifiable via academic API* --- ## Clinical Trials ### Completed Trials | NCT | Title | Status | Phase | Sponsor | Notes | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | NCT04353024 | Effects of Dimethyltryptamine in Healthy Subjects | Completed | Phase 1 | University Hospital Basel | IV DMT PK/PD in healthy subjects | | NCT04640831 | Safety of GH001 in Healthy Volunteers | Completed | Phase 1 | GH Research Ireland | Inhaled DMT formulation | | NCT04673383 | SPL026 (DMT Fumarate) in Healthy Subjects and MDD Patients | Completed | Phase 1 | Small Pharma Ltd | Key PK study; Good et al. 2023 [Ref 25]; James et al. 2024 [Ref 26] | | NCT05553691 | SPL026 With or Without SSRIs in Participants With MDD | Completed | Phase 1 | Small Pharma Ltd | CYP2D6 interaction assessment | | NCT02914769 | Antidepressant Effects of Ayahuasca in Treatment Resistant Depression | Completed | Phase 1 | UFRN (Brazil) | Palhano-Fontes 2018 [Ref 19]; first RCT of DMT-containing preparation for TRD | | NCT05780216 | Mindfulness and Psychedelics | Completed | Early Phase 1 | Milan Scheidegger | DMT + harmine buccal formulation; Egger et al. 2025 [Ref 10]; Äbelö et al. 2025 [Ref 12]; Mueller et al. 2024 [Ref 11] | ### Active / Recruiting / Planned Trials | NCT | Title | Status | Phase | Sponsor | Notes | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | NCT04711915 | Fixed Order, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of DMT in Humans | Active, Not Recruiting | Phase 1 | Yale University | Depression, Deepak D'Souza's group | | NCT06671977 | Study of Safety, Tolerability, Electrophysiological Effects and Efficacy of DMT in Humans | Recruiting | Phase 1 | Deepak C. D'Souza | Electrophysiology + depression | | NCT06258031 | PsilOCD: A Pharmacological-Challenge Feasibility Study | Completed | Phase 1 | Imperial College London | DMT as pharmacological probe for OCD | | NCT05804708 | Phase 2 Clinical Trial of GH001 in Postpartum Depression | Terminated | Phase 2 | GH Research Ireland | Inhaled DMT for PPD; terminated | | NCT07562191 | Inhaled DMT for Major Depressive Disorder | Not Yet Recruiting | Phase 2 | UFRN (Brazil) | First Phase 2 for DMT specifically in MDD | **Key Pipeline Note (Melani et al. 2026 [Ref 32]):** As of early 2026, there are reportedly four Phase 2 studies of 5-MeO-DMT and one with DMT for TRD, plus two Phase 2 studies with DMT fumarate for MDD. These additional Phase 2 studies were not all captured in the ClinicalTrials.gov search and should be verified. --- ## Community Feedback Analysis No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. --- ## Gaps & Flags ### 🔴 Safety-Critical Flags 1. **Tolerance citation discrepancy (HIGH PRIORITY):** The seed data attributes "no tolerance with repeated IV bolus doses" to *Erne et al. 2026* (PMID 39702577). This paper actually studied continuous infusion and found *moderate* tolerance. The bolus tolerance claim originates from Strassman's 1990–1995 program, not Erne. The seed data contains an incorrect citation. **Recommend:** Correct the Erne citation; note tolerance mechanism language is accurate but citation is wrong. 2. **Lithium interaction mechanism:** The "dangerous" classification for DMT + lithium is a class-based inference (shared with LSD + lithium case reports); no DMT + lithium-specific published data found. Should be flagged as class inference in the article. 3. **Tramadol interaction:** "Dangerous" classification is based on tramadol's weak MAOI/serotonergic activity + theoretical serotonin syndrome risk; no DMT + tramadol primary data found. 4. **Cardiovascular safety in at-risk populations:** No published data on DMT administration in individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The relative contraindication is inferred from documented transient cardiovascular activation in healthy volunteers. 5. **Bipolar I contraindication:** No DMT-specific data; absolute contraindication is class-based inference from 5-HT2A agonism and clinical experience with other serotonergic psychedelics. ### 🟡 Data Gaps 6. **SMILES in database:** Missing from the brief — confirmed SMILES is `CN(C)CCc1c[nH]c2ccccc12`. Should be added to DB. 7. **PubChem CID in database:** Missing from the brief — confirmed as 6089. Should be added. 8. **Molecular formula and weight:** Missing from the brief — confirmed C₁₂H₁₆N₂, 188.27 g/mol. 9. **Strassman tolerance primary source:** No published primary paper was found specifically documenting the absence of tolerance with sequential bolus IV doses. Strassman's book [Ref 48] references this but is not peer-reviewed primary data. This is a gap for the tolerance section. 10. **Davis entity encounter survey:** The well-cited Davis et al. 2020 survey on entity encounter experiences (Journal of Psychopharmacology) was not locatable via PMID in the PubMed API during this search session. The entity encounter data is instead supported by Lawrence et al. (2022 [Ref 24], Scientific Reports, n=3,778). 11. **Cross-tolerance:** The claim that DMT shows cross-tolerance with LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, and 5-MeO-DMT is expected from shared 5-HT2A mechanism but was not found in a DMT-specific published study. Flag as class inference. 12. **Physical properties (melting point, solubility):** No primary source for DMT freebase mp ~40–44°C was located via API. Widely cited in literature but original characterization is pre-digital. 13. **CAS number 61-50-7:** Standard CAS for DMT freebase; not verifiable via the PubMed/Crossref APIs used. 14. **Endogenous DMT in humans:** Evidence in rodents is solid (Barker et al. 2013 [Ref 41]). The biosynthesis pathway via INMT is well-characterized mechanistically (Coutinho et al. 2023), but Glynos et al. (2023 [Ref 38]) showed INMT may not be the essential biosynthetic enzyme in rats — suggesting alternative pathways. The endogenous DMT hypothesis remains scientifically active but not fully resolved. 15. **Phase 2 clinical trials:** Melani et al. (2026 [Ref 32]) reference Phase 2 trials for DMT and 5-MeO-DMT in TRD/MDD, but not all trials were captured in ClinicalTrials.gov search. Generation agent should perform additional trial registry search before finalizing clinical section. 16. **Primary ROA in database:** Brief lists "Primary ROA" as blank. Based on current clinical research focus and historical use, smoked is the most common recreational ROA; IV is the research/clinical standard. The article should note both without designating a primary. ### 🟢 Seed Data Confirmed Accurate - Chemical class: Indole, Indoleamine, Tryptamine — confirmed - Pharmacological class: 5-HT2A/1A agonist, sigma-1 agonist — confirmed - Dose ranges (smoked, IV, oral) — broadly consistent with Strassman 1994 and Riba 2003 - Duration data — consistent with published PK and phenomenology studies - Dependence data — confirmed: no physical or psychological dependence documented - Toxicity data: negligible acute/chronic, cardiovascular primary — confirmed - Contraindications — all biologically plausible; most confirmed by class pharmacology - Known interactions with lithium and tramadol as "dangerous" — class-based but appropriate conservative rating