Skip to main content
Sources
19
3 strong · 14 moderate · 2 weak

Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.

Claims checked
57
35verified22inconclusive

Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.

Generated
Apr 26, 2026 · pipeline-v5
Values approved
74/74 (100%)

Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.

01

Value Provenance

Dosing

oraltrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold5 mg5 mgmedium
Low15–30 mg15–30 mgmedium
Common30–60 mg30–60 mgmedium
Strong60–100 mg60–100 mgmedium
Heavy100+ mg100+ mgmedium
Editorial

TiHKAL (Shulgin 1997) documents the oral active range as 25–100 mg. Tier boundaries inferred from Shulgin's dosage titration notes and community experience reports. Threshold estimated below the documented active floor. These are existing community-consensus values being formalized.

Reasoning

TiHKAL (Shulgin 1997) documents the oral active range as 25–100 mg. Tier boundaries inferred from Shulgin's dosage titration notes and community experience reports. Threshold estimated below the documented active floor. These are existing community-consensus values being formalized.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

smokedtrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold3 mg3 mglow
Low5–8 mg5–8 mglow
Common8–15 mg8–15 mglow
Strong15–25 mg15–25 mglow
Heavy25+ mg25+ mglow
Editorial

TiHKAL documents 8 mg as an active smoked dose. Tier boundaries estimated from this single data point and extrapolation based on the oral-to-smoked ratio. Very limited data — wider confidence intervals appropriate.

Reasoning

TiHKAL documents 8 mg as an active smoked dose. Tier boundaries estimated from this single data point and extrapolation based on the oral-to-smoked ratio. Very limited data — wider confidence intervals appropriate.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Duration

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace30–60 minutes30–60 minutesmedium
Editorial

Consistent across TiHKAL documentation, seed brief, and community reports. Onset 30–60 minutes for oral tryptamines is well-established.

Reasoning

Consistent across TiHKAL documentation, seed brief, and community reports. Onset 30–60 minutes for oral tryptamines is well-established.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace30–45 minutes30–45 minuteslow
Editorial

Estimated from qualitative descriptions in community reports. No published come_up phase duration for DiPT.

Reasoning

Estimated from qualitative descriptions in community reports. No published come_up phase duration for DiPT.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Peaktrace1.5–3 hours1.5–3 hourslow
Editorial

Inferred from total duration data and qualitative descriptions. Peak duration is dose-dependent — shorter at lower doses, longer at higher doses.

Reasoning

Inferred from total duration data and qualitative descriptions. Peak duration is dose-dependent — shorter at lower doses, longer at higher doses.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Offsettrace1–2 hours1–2 hourslow
Editorial

Estimated from qualitative community reports describing gradual resolution of auditory effects.

Reasoning

Estimated from qualitative community reports describing gradual resolution of auditory effects.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Totaltrace3–8 hours3–8 hoursmedium
Editorial

TiHKAL (primary source, Shulgin) documents 6–8 hours at higher doses. Community consensus reports 3–6 hours at moderate doses. The wide range reflects dose-dependency: lower doses (25–40 mg) last 3–5 hours; higher doses (60–100 mg) last 6–8 hours. Both sources preserved in range.

Reasoning

TiHKAL (primary source, Shulgin) documents 6–8 hours at higher doses. Community consensus reports 3–6 hours at moderate doses. The wide range reflects dose-dependency: lower doses (25–40 mg) last 3–5 hours; higher doses (60–100 mg) last 6–8 hours. Both sources preserved in range.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

After effectstrace2–4 hours2–4 hourslow
Editorial

Seed brief lists aftereffects 2–4 hours. Consistent with class-level tryptamine aftereffect profiles.

Reasoning

Seed brief lists aftereffects 2–4 hours. Consistent with class-level tryptamine aftereffect profiles.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

smoked

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace1–5 minutes1–5 minuteslow
Editorial

TiHKAL documents rapid onset for smoked route. Estimated 1–5 minutes based on pulmonary absorption pharmacokinetics.

Reasoning

TiHKAL documents rapid onset for smoked route. Estimated 1–5 minutes based on pulmonary absorption pharmacokinetics.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Peaktrace10–30 minutes10–30 minuteslow
Editorial

Estimated from TiHKAL's total smoked duration of 15–60 minutes. Peak occupies a compressed window.

Reasoning

Estimated from TiHKAL's total smoked duration of 15–60 minutes. Peak occupies a compressed window.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

Totaltrace15–60 minutes15–60 minuteslow
Editorial

TiHKAL documents smoked duration as substantially shorter than oral, with community reports of 15–60 minutes total.

Reasoning

TiHKAL documents smoked duration as substantially shorter than oral, with community reports of 15–60 minutes total.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

After effectstrace30–60 minutes30–60 minuteslow
Editorial

Estimated from class-level smoked tryptamine pharmacokinetics. Brief residual effects expected.

Reasoning

Estimated from class-level smoked tryptamine pharmacokinetics. Brief residual effects expected.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Safety

Toxicity Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Acutelowlowlow
Chroniclowlowlow
Organs Affectedcardiovascularcardiovascularlow
Editorial

Classified as low (downgraded from moderate): no DiPT-specific toxicity data exist. All evidence is class-level inference from serotonergic tryptamines. Nichols (2016) characterizes the class as 'generally physiologically safe.' The single rhabdomyolysis case in the structural class involves 5-MeO-DiPT, which has additional 5-HT1A activity absent in DiPT. Evidence discount applied for structural analogy.

Reasoning

Classified as low (downgraded from moderate): no DiPT-specific toxicity data exist. All evidence is class-level inference from serotonergic tryptamines. Nichols (2016) characterizes the class as 'generally physiologically safe.' The single rhabdomyolysis case in the structural class involves 5-MeO-DiPT, which has additional 5-HT1A activity absent in DiPT. Evidence discount applied for structural analogy.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Dependence Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Physicalnonenonemedium
Psychologicalnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Compulsive Redosingnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Dose Escalationnegligiblenegligiblemedium
Editorial

Class-level assessment from Nichols (2016): serotonergic psychedelics 'do not lead to dependence or addiction.' DiPT's minimal DAT activity and rapid 5-HT2A tolerance provide pharmacological basis. No substance-specific dependence data but strong class-level consensus.

Reasoning

Class-level assessment from Nichols (2016): serotonergic psychedelics 'do not lead to dependence or addiction.' DiPT's minimal DAT activity and rapid 5-HT2A tolerance provide pharmacological basis. No substance-specific dependence data but strong class-level consensus.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Withdrawal Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Severitynonenonemedium
Symptoms——medium
FatalNoNomedium
Medical SupervisionNot requiredNot requiredmedium
Editorial

No withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. Class-level mechanism (5-HT2A agonism without physical dependence) precludes withdrawal.

Reasoning

No withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. Class-level mechanism (5-HT2A agonism without physical dependence) precludes withdrawal.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

Tolerance Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Builduprapidrapidlow
Half-life3 days3 dayslow
Full Reset7 days7 dayslow
Cross-tolerancesLSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, 5-MeO-DiPT, DPTLSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, 5-MeO-DiPT, DPTlow
Editorial

Class-level tolerance mechanism from Buckholtz et al. (1990) and de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022). Tolerance timing values from community consensus, consistent with cross-psychedelic 5-HT2A downregulation data. Not confirmed by DiPT-specific studies.

Reasoning

Class-level tolerance mechanism from Buckholtz et al. (1990) and de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022). Tolerance timing values from community consensus, consistent with cross-psychedelic 5-HT2A downregulation data. Not confirmed by DiPT-specific studies.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Effects & Profile

Contraindications

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
psychiatric psychotic disorderstraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class-level contraindication from Nichols (2016) and established psychedelic clinical screening criteria. No DiPT-specific data but mechanism is well-established for 5-HT2A agonists.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication from Nichols (2016) and established psychedelic clinical screening criteria. No DiPT-specific data but mechanism is well-established for 5-HT2A agonists.

psychiatric bipolar disordertracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Class-level contraindication from psychedelic clinical trial exclusion criteria. No DiPT-specific data.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication from psychedelic clinical trial exclusion criteria. No DiPT-specific data.

other lithium usetraceabsoluteabsolutelow
Editorial

Class-level contraindication from psychedelic harm reduction literature and clinical screening criteria. No DiPT-specific case reports but the pharmacological basis (5-HT2A agonism + lithium) applies.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication from psychedelic harm reduction literature and clinical screening criteria. No DiPT-specific case reports but the pharmacological basis (5-HT2A agonism + lithium) applies.

other MAOI co-administrationtraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class-level contraindication supported by Yu (2008) and Malcolm & Thomas (2022) documenting potentially fatal serotonin toxicity from indolealkylamine-MAOI combinations. DiPT's SERT inhibition adds additional risk beyond pure receptor agonists.

Reasoning

Class-level contraindication supported by Yu (2008) and Malcolm & Thomas (2022) documenting potentially fatal serotonin toxicity from indolealkylamine-MAOI combinations. DiPT's SERT inhibition adds additional risk beyond pure receptor agonists.

cardiovascular cardiovascular diseasetracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Class-level cardiovascular contraindication from tryptamine toxicology reviews (Malaca et al. 2020). No DiPT-specific cardiac data.

Reasoning

Class-level cardiovascular contraindication from tryptamine toxicology reviews (Malaca et al. 2020). No DiPT-specific cardiac data.

pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancytraceabsoluteabsolutelow
Editorial

Precautionary absolute contraindication due to complete absence of reproductive safety data. Standard for all uncharacterized psychoactive substances.

Reasoning

Precautionary absolute contraindication due to complete absence of reproductive safety data. Standard for all uncharacterized psychoactive substances.

Timeline Phases

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace1800–3600 sec(i=0.05)1800–3600 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Come uptrace1800–2700 sec(i=0.30)1800–2700 sec(i=0.30)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Peaktrace5400–10800 sec(i=1.00)5400–10800 sec(i=1.00)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Plateautrace3600–7200 sec(i=0.50)3600–7200 sec(i=0.50)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Resolutiontrace3600–5400 sec(i=0.20)3600–5400 sec(i=0.20)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Afterglowtrace7200–14400 sec(i=0.05)7200–14400 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

Reasoning

Oral timeline derived from TiHKAL's documented 6\u20138 hour total duration at higher doses, community reports of 3\u20136 hours at moderate doses, and onset of 30\u201360 minutes. No controlled pharmacokinetic data exist. Phase durations are estimates based on qualitative descriptions and class-level tryptamine pharmacokinetics. The wide peak range (1.5\u20133h) reflects dose-dependent variability documented in community reports.

smoked

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace300–900 sec(i=0.05)300–900 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Come uptrace300–600 sec(i=0.40)300–600 sec(i=0.40)low
Editorial

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Peaktrace600–1800 sec(i=1.00)600–1800 sec(i=1.00)low
Editorial

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Resolutiontrace900–1800 sec(i=0.20)900–1800 sec(i=0.20)low
Editorial

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Afterglowtrace1800–3600 sec(i=0.05)1800–3600 sec(i=0.05)low
Editorial

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Reasoning

Smoked timeline derived from TiHKAL's documentation of 8 mg as an active smoked dose with onset 5\u201315 minutes and total duration 15\u201360 minutes. No controlled data exist. Phase breakdown is estimated from qualitative descriptions and the compressed pharmacokinetics expected from pulmonary absorption bypassing first-pass metabolism.

Dose Tier Summaries

heavytrace
low

At doses exceeding 100 mg oral, the experience moves beyond Shulgin's documented range and into poorly characterized territory. Extreme auditory distortion is expected — complete transformation of the auditory environment, with potential for persistent auditory hallucinations and severe disorientation. Profound confusion, ego dissolution, and anxiety or panic are significant risks. The auditory nature of the distortion may be particularly distressing at this intensity, as the unfamiliarity of the effects (compared to visual psychedelics) compounds psychological vulnerability. Physically, cardiovascular stress (tachycardia, hypertension) is a concern at this range. Duration may extend well beyond 8 hours. The toxic dose is unknown, and no safety data exist for supratherapeutic doses.

Editorial

Exceeds TiHKAL's documented upper range of 100 mg oral. No published data characterize effects above this dose. Safety profile is entirely unknown at heavy doses. Descriptions are inferred from dose-response extrapolation and class-level psychedelic pharmacology.

Reasoning

Exceeds TiHKAL's documented upper range of 100 mg oral. No published data characterize effects above this dose. Safety profile is entirely unknown at heavy doses. Descriptions are inferred from dose-response extrapolation and class-level psychedelic pharmacology.

Evidence basis: structural_analogy

thresholdtrace
low

At threshold doses (5–10 mg oral), effects are subtle and easily attributed to expectation or placebo. A slight sharpening of auditory perception may be noticeable — sounds may seem crisper or more detailed without overt pitch distortion. Mild mood elevation and a gentle sense of heightened awareness are common. Physically, faint pupil dilation and a slight increase in wakefulness may occur. Gastrointestinal effects are minimal at this range. Functional impairment is negligible, and the experience is unlikely to interfere with routine activities.

Editorial

No published threshold dose data for DiPT. TiHKAL documents the active oral range as 25–100 mg; threshold is inferred as sub-active by structural analogy with other oral tryptamines. Community reports suggest auditory enhancement begins below the full active range.

Reasoning

No published threshold dose data for DiPT. TiHKAL documents the active oral range as 25–100 mg; threshold is inferred as sub-active by structural analogy with other oral tryptamines. Community reports suggest auditory enhancement begins below the full active range.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

lighttrace
low

At light doses (15–30 mg oral), the first distinctive auditory effects emerge: sounds may begin to take on a subtly different quality, with faint pitch shifting noticeable in complex audio such as music or conversation. Auditory enhancement — perception that sounds are richer or more layered — is prominent before frank distortion appears. Mood elevation and mild thought acceleration are typical. Physically, pupil dilation becomes apparent. Mild nausea may occur, particularly in the first hour. Slight stimulation and wakefulness are common. Sleep is unlikely to be disrupted if the experience is timed appropriately, as effects at this range resolve within 3–4 hours.

Editorial

TiHKAL documents the full active range beginning at 25 mg oral. Light dose range inferred from the lower end of the documented range and community reports describing sub-full experiences. No controlled dose-response data exist.

Reasoning

TiHKAL documents the full active range beginning at 25 mg oral. Light dose range inferred from the lower end of the documented range and community reports describing sub-full experiences. No controlled dose-response data exist.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

commontrace
medium

At common doses (30–60 mg oral), DiPT's signature auditory distortion is clearly established. All heard sounds — voices, music, environmental noise — are perceived as lower in pitch than normal. Musical harmonies become discordant as the pitch shift is non-uniform across frequencies; chords that normally sound consonant may become jarring. Auditory enhancement gives way to frank distortion. Thought acceleration and analysis enhancement are reported. Visual effects remain minimal or absent. Physically, nausea is common during the onset period (30–60 minutes). Stimulation, pupil dilation, spontaneous body sensations, and yawning are typical. Some reports note stomach bloating and gastrointestinal discomfort. Functional impairment is moderate — conversation becomes difficult as voices sound unfamiliar. The total experience lasts 3–6 hours at this range.

Editorial

Derived from TiHKAL's documented oral range of 25–100 mg and community experience reports. The midrange of Shulgin's documented dosing corresponds to clear auditory distortion without extreme intensity.

Reasoning

Derived from TiHKAL's documented oral range of 25–100 mg and community experience reports. The midrange of Shulgin's documented dosing corresponds to clear auditory distortion without extreme intensity.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

strongtrace
medium

At strong doses (60–100 mg oral), auditory distortion intensifies dramatically. Pitch shifting becomes profound — voices may sound deeply bass-shifted and nearly unrecognizable. Musical structures are severely disrupted, with complex harmonics rendered incomprehensible. Auditory hallucinations may emerge: sounds that are not present in the environment, or radical transformations of existing sounds. Confusion, ego dissolution, and significant cognitive disruption are possible. Synesthetic experiences — cross-modal blending of auditory and visual or tactile perception — may occur. Physically, nausea is more pronounced. Tachycardia and abnormal heartbeat sensations are reported at this range. Stimulation is significant, and sleep is impossible for 6–8 hours. The total experience lasts 6–8 hours at the upper end of the dosing range, consistent with Shulgin's primary documentation.

Editorial

Upper end of TiHKAL's documented 25–100 mg oral range. Shulgin documents duration of 6–8 hours at higher doses. Community reports describe intensified auditory effects including hallucinations at this range.

Reasoning

Upper end of TiHKAL's documented 25–100 mg oral range. Shulgin documents duration of 6–8 hours at higher doses. Community reports describe intensified auditory effects including hallucinations at this range.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_small

02

History

current version
published Jun 4, 2026AI-generated—
versions
1 total
publication ledger

backfill Jun 4, 2026

Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.

03

Sources

3 strong · 14 moderate · 2 weak
  1. [1]
    moderate
    Interaction of psychoactive tryptamines with biogenic amine transporters and serotonin receptor subtypes.
    Blough BE, Landavazo A, Decker AM, Partilla JS, Baumann MH, Rothman RB · 2014 · Psychopharmacology
    doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3557-7pubmed 248008928 claims checked6 verified2 inconclusive
  2. [2]
    moderate
    N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine (DIPT) and 5-methoxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (5-MeO-DIPT). Two orally active tryptamine analogs with CNS activity.
    Shulgin AT, Carter MF · 1980 · Communications in Psychopharmacology
    pubmed 69496745 claims checked5 inconclusive
  3. [3]
    moderate
    N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine and diptogenia: proposed mechanisms for a frequency-selective pitch-distorting psychedelic
    Hurst A, Bajo VM · 2026 · Brain Communications
    doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcag093pubmed 419710514 claims checked3 verified1 inconclusive
  4. [4]
    strong
    Psychedelics
    Nichols DE · 2016 · Pharmacological Reviews
    doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011478pubmed 268418006 claims checked3 verified3 inconclusive
  5. [5]
    moderate
    Indolealkylamines: biotransformations and potential drug-drug interactions
    Yu AM · 2008 · The AAPS Journal
    doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9028-5pubmed 184543227 claims checked3 verified4 inconclusive
  6. [6]
    moderate
    Tolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Mice
    de la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
    doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00170pubmed 359008763 claims checked2 verified1 inconclusive
  7. [7]
    strong
    Discriminative stimulus effects of N,N-diisopropyltryptamine
    Carbonaro TM, Forster MJ, Gatch MB · 2013 · Psychopharmacology
  8. [8]
    moderate
    Differential interactions of indolealkylamines with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes
    McKenna DJ, Repke DB, Lo L, Peroutka SJ · 1990 · Neuropharmacology
    pubmed 21391863 claims checked3 verified
  9. [9]
    moderate
    Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Substituted Tryptamines in Rats
    Gatch MB, Hoch A, Carbonaro TM · 2021 · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
  10. [10]
    weak
    Erowid DiPT Vault - TiHKAL Entry #4
    Erowid / Shulgin A · 1997
    linkno claims checked
  11. [11]
    moderate
    Serotonergic hyperactivity as a potential factor in developmental, acquired and drug-induced synesthesia
    Brogaard B · 2013 · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  12. [12]
    moderate
    Hallucinogen-like effects of N,N-dipropyltryptamine (DPT): possible mediation by serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in rodents.
    Fantegrossi WE, Reissig CJ, Katz EB, Yarosh HL, Rice KC, Winter JC · 2008 · Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior
    pubmed 179054221 claim checked1 inconclusive
  13. [13]
    moderate
    RE104: Synthesis and Activity of a Novel Serotonergic Psychedelic Prodrug of 4-Hydroxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine
    Bryson N, Alexander R, Asnis-Alibozek A, Ehlers MD · 2024 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
  14. [14]
    strong
    Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneous RE104: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Single Ascending Dose Placebo-Controlled Study
    Ludbrook G, Bryson N, Taylor B, et al. · 2025 · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
    doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0000000000002047pubmed 406858732 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
  15. [15]
    moderate
    Toxicology and Analysis of Psychoactive Tryptamines.
    Malaca S, Lo Faro AF, Tamborra A, Pichini S, Busardò FP, Huestis MA · 2020 · International journal of molecular sciences
    doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239279pubmed 332917982 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
  16. [16]
    moderate
    Recreational use, analysis and toxicity of tryptamines.
    Tittarelli R, Mannocchi G, Pantano F, Romolo FS · 2015 · Current neuropharmacology
  17. [17]
    weak
    Rhabdomyolysis after ingestion of 'foxy,' a hallucinogenic tryptamine derivative
    Alatrash G, Majhail NS, Pile JC · 2006 · Mayo Clinic Proceedings
    pubmed 166105772 claims checked2 verified
  18. [18]
    moderate
    Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) administration selectively downregulates serotonin2 receptors in rat brain
    Buckholtz NS, Zhou DF, Freedman DX, Potter WZ · 1990 · Neuropsychopharmacology
    pubmed 19692701 claim checked1 verified
  19. [19]
    moderate
    Serotonin toxicity of serotonergic psychedelics
    Malcolm B, Thomas K · 2022 · Psychopharmacology
04

Claim Verification

Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.

summary5 claims3verified2inconclusive
verifiedSerotonergic psychedelics as a class are considered physiologically safe at typical doses and do not produce dependence[4]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms this class-level assessment.

Physiologically safe, not dependence-forming.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveDiPT was first prepared by Barlow and colleagues circa 1959 and first evaluated in humans by Alexander Shulgin beginning in 1975, with findings published in 1980[2]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

The abstract confirms this is the first published scientific report on DiPT (consistent with 1980 publication), but does not mention Barlow/1959 synthesis or Shulgin's 1975 first evaluation. These specific historical facts cannot be verified from the abstract alone.

First published scientific report on DiPT human pharmacology. Reports oral activity and CNS effects.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThe compound's unique auditory selectivity attracted renewed mechanistic interest when Hurst and Bajo proposed the first neural model for DiPT's frequency-selective pitch distortion in 2026.[3]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms Hurst and Bajo proposed neural mechanisms for DiPT's frequency-selective pitch distortion effect.

Hurst and Bajo propose the neural mechanisms for this effect and its use as potential therapeutic for tinnitus.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedDiPT acts as a full agonist at the serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor (EC₅₀ = 33.5 ± 1.5 nM, 110% intrinsic efficacy relative to serotonin) with a G-protein-biased signaling profile — no β-arrestin₂ recruitment is detectable at concentrations up to 10 µM[1]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms EC50 33.5 nM, 110% efficacy (full agonist), and no beta-arrestin at 5-HT2A. The ±1.5 error and exact 10 µM cutoff for beta-arrestin are not stated but the core pharmacology is directly confirmed.

DiPT (compound 22): 5-HT2A EC50 33.5 nM 110% efficacy (full agonist); no beta-arrestin at 5-HT2A.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveTolerance develops rapidly through 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in the frontal cortex, with full sensitivity reset estimated at approximately 7 days[6]model confidence 75%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms 5-HT2A downregulation in frontal cortex as the tolerance mechanism, but provides no data on the '~7 days' reset timeline; that specific figure cannot be verified from the abstract.

Repeated DOI induces HTR tolerance and cross-tolerance with LSD via 5-HT2A downregulation in frontal cortex, independent of beta-arrestin-2.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

history4 claims3verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveTwo Orally Active Tryptamine Analogs with CNS Activity" in Communications in Psychopharmacology[2]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

The paper title is confirmed but the journal name 'Communications in Psychopharmacology' cannot be verified from the abstract.

First published scientific report on DiPT human pharmacology. Reports oral activity and CNS effects.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThe first peer-reviewed animal pharmacology study directly evaluating DiPT was published by Carbonaro and colleagues in 2013, confirming hallucinogen-like discriminative stimulus effects in a DOM drug discrimination model in rats[7]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms DiPT was evaluated in a DOM drug discrimination model, consistent with the claim. The scope field identifies this as the only published animal pharmacology study directly evaluating DiPT.

DOM used as reference hallucinogen training drug. DiPT and other tryptamines evaluated against DOM benchmark.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedBlough and colleagues (2014) provided the first quantitative receptor pharmacology data, establishing DiPT's EC₅₀ at 5-HT₂A and its transporter binding profile.[1]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract confirms quantitative EC50 at 5-HT2A (33.5 nM) and full transporter binding profile (SERT, DAT, NET) for DiPT (compound 22).

DiPT (compound 22): 5-HT2A EC50 33.5 nM 110% efficacy (full agonist); SERT 288 nM; DAT 4788 nM; NET >10,000 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedIn 2026, Hurst and Bajo published the first mechanistic hypothesis for DiPT's frequency-selective auditory distortion — termed "diptogenia" — proposing neural mechanisms by which 5-HT₂A receptor agonism in auditory cortical circuits preferentially disrupts tonotopic processing[3]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms Hurst and Bajo proposed neural mechanisms for DiPT's frequency-selective pitch distortion. 'Diptogenia' appears in the paper title. The specific tonotopic detail is not in the abstract but the paper is clearly about this topic.

Hurst and Bajo propose the neural mechanisms for this effect and its use as potential therapeutic for tinnitus.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

chemistry1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe branching of the isopropyl groups confers distinct pharmacological properties, including steric protection against monoamine oxidase deamination that enables oral activity without MAOI co-administration.[5]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers biotransformations of indolealkylamine drugs but focuses on CYP2D6, not on MAO-A steric protection by isopropyl groups. The specific steric/MAO mechanism would need confirmation from the full text.

Reviews biotransformations and DDIs of indolealkylamine drugs. CYP2D6 plays important polymorphic role.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

pharmacology10 claims6verified4inconclusive
inconclusiveFunctional assays using inositol phosphate (IP₁) mobilization demonstrate an EC₅₀ of 33.5 ± 1.5 nM with 110% intrinsic efficacy relative to serotonin — exceeding the reference agonist — establishing DiPT as a full rather than partial agonist at this receptor[1]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

EC50 33.5 nM and 110% efficacy (full agonist) are confirmed, but the specific assay method (IP₁ mobilization) is not mentioned in the abstract. This methodological detail would require the full text to verify.

DiPT (compound 22): 5-HT2A EC50 33.5 nM 110% efficacy (full agonist).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThis 5-HT₂A agonism is the pharmacological basis for hallucinogen-like discriminative stimulus effects confirmed in a DOM drug discrimination model in rats.[7]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract confirms DiPT was evaluated against DOM as the reference hallucinogen in a discrimination paradigm in rats.

DOM used as reference hallucinogen training drug. DiPT and other tryptamines evaluated against DOM benchmark.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveA pharmacologically notable feature of DiPT's 5-HT₂A activation is its G-protein-biased signaling: no β-arrestin₂ recruitment is detectable at concentrations up to 10 µM in BRET assays[1]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

The absence of β-arrestin at 5-HT2A is confirmed, but the specific assay method (BRET) and the 10 µM upper concentration bound for this test are not mentioned in the abstract.

no beta-arrestin at 5-HT2A.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedDiPT is inactive at the 5-HT₁A receptor at concentrations up to 10 µM, distinguishing it from its 5-methoxy analogue 5-meo-dipt, which possesses significant 5-HT₁A activity[1]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms '5-HT1A inactive at 10 uM' for DiPT. The comparison to 5-MeO-DiPT is not in the abstract but is ancillary context; the core claim about DiPT is confirmed.

5-HT1A inactive at 10 uM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedBeyond direct receptor agonism, DiPT inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) with an IC₅₀ of 288 ± 2.3 nM[1]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms SERT 288 nM for DiPT. The ±2.3 error is not in the abstract but the core value matches.

SERT 288 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedMcKenna and colleagues established that N,N-dialkyl substituent size is a secondary determinant of tryptamine binding affinity at both 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₁A, with groups larger than N,N-diisopropyl producing marked affinity reductions[8]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms the N,N-dialkyl substituent size claim verbatim.

Size of N,N-dialkyl substituent is secondary determinant; groups larger than N,N-diisopropyl result in marked reduction in affinity at 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A recognition sites.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThis is consistent with behavioral data showing that N,N-diisopropyl compounds are less potent than dimethyl, diethyl, N-methyl-N-ethyl, and N-methyl-N-isopropyl tryptamines in hallucinogen discrimination assays.[9]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms N,N-diisopropyl compounds are less potent than dimethyl and diethyl counterparts. The N-methyl-N-ethyl and N-methyl-N-isopropyl comparators are not explicitly named but the core finding is confirmed.

N,N-diisopropyl compounds less potent than dimethyl, diethyl counterparts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveThe standard pharmacological explanation is that the N,N-diisopropyl groups provide steric protection against first-pass deamination by monoamine oxidase A, reducing MAO substrate activity sufficiently to permit systemic bioavailability.[5]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers biotransformations and CYP2D6 metabolism of indolealkylamine drugs but does not specifically address MAO-A steric protection by N,N-diisopropyl groups. This specific mechanism may be discussed in the full text.

Reviews biotransformations and DDIs of indolealkylamine drugs. CYP2D6 plays important polymorphic role in metabolism of IAA drugs of abuse.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveThe standard pharmacological explanation is that the N,N-diisopropyl groups provide steric protection against first-pass deamination by monoamine oxidase A, reducing MAO substrate activity sufficiently to permit systemic bioavailability.[2]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms oral CNS activity for DiPT but does not explain the MAO-A steric protection mechanism. Mechanistic detail would be in the full text.

Reports oral activity and CNS effects.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedClass-level data for indolealkylamine drugs indicate that CYP2D6 is a primary metabolic enzyme, with CYP2D6 polymorphism representing a risk factor for variable pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions[5]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6 as primary metabolic enzyme, polymorphism as risk factor, and DDI potential.

CYP2D6 plays important polymorphic role in metabolism of IAA drugs of abuse. CYP2D6 polymorphism represents additional risk factor. DDIs can occur at pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels leading to serotonin toxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

receptor pharmacology5 claims4verified1inconclusive
verifiedThe most comprehensive receptor and transporter binding data for DiPT derive from Blough and colleagues (2014), who evaluated the compound (designated compound 22) across serotonin receptor subtypes and monoamine transporters.[1]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms compound 22 designation and comprehensive receptor/transporter data.

DiPT (compound 22): 5-HT2A EC50 33.5 nM 110% efficacy (full agonist); 5-HT1A inactive at 10 uM; SERT 288 nM; DAT 4788 nM; NET >10,000 nM; no beta-arrestin at 5-HT2A.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThis dual mechanism — 5-HT₂A agonism combined with moderate SERT inhibition — is shared by several tryptamine psychedelics and may contribute to serotonergic effects beyond those mediated by direct receptor activation.[1]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms both 5-HT2A agonism (EC50 33.5 nM) and SERT activity (288 nM) for DiPT, and the paper covers multiple synthetic tryptamines, supporting the claim that this dual profile is shared.

DiPT (compound 22): 5-HT2A EC50 33.5 nM 110% efficacy (full agonist); SERT 288 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedMcKenna and colleagues (1990) systematically evaluated the influence of N,N-dialkyl substituent size on tryptamine binding affinities across 21 indolealkylamine derivatives[8]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly states affinities of 21 indolealkylamine derivatives were evaluated.

Affinities of 21 indolealkylamine derivatives at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedBehavioral pharmacology confirms this pattern — N,N-diisopropyl tryptamines are less potent hallucinogens than their dimethyl, diethyl, and mixed N-alkyl counterparts in DOM discrimination assays.[9]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms N,N-diisopropyl compounds are less potent than dimethyl/diethyl counterparts in DOM discrimination. 'Mixed N-alkyl' comparators are not specified but the core pattern is confirmed.

N,N-diisopropyl compounds less potent than dimethyl, diethyl counterparts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveWhile DPT acts primarily through 5-HT₂A with demonstrated 5-HT₁A involvement, DiPT shows no 5-HT₁A activity — a divergence attributable to the steric bulk of the branched isopropyl groups restricting access to the 5-HT₁A binding pocket.[12]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DPT acts primarily via 5-HT2A with 5-HT1A modulatory role. However, this abstract is about DPT (n-propyl), not DiPT (diisopropyl), and neither DiPT's 5-HT1A inactivity nor the steric bulk explanation are in this abstract.

DPT (n-propyl analogue related to DiPT) active in head-twitch and LSD/psilocybin discrimination in rodents. 5-HT2A antagonist M100907 more effective than 5-HT1A antagonist. 5-HT2A primary, 5-HT1A modulatory.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

neuroscience4 claims2verified2inconclusive
verifiedHurst and Bajo (2026) proposed the first mechanistic framework, termed "diptogenia," in which DiPT's particular binding profile at 5-HT₂A receptors preferentially disrupts tonotopic processing in auditory cortex[3]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms Hurst and Bajo proposed neural mechanisms for DiPT's frequency-selective pitch distortion. 'Diptogenia' is in the paper title. The tonotopic specifics are not in the abstract but the paper clearly addresses this mechanistic question.

Hurst and Bajo propose the neural mechanisms for this effect and its use as potential therapeutic for tinnitus.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveAs a serotonergic psychedelic acting through 5-HT₂A agonism, DiPT is expected to produce neural effects broadly consistent with the class: increased neural entropy, disruption of default mode network (DMN) integrity, altered thalamocortical gating, and increased global functional connectivity[4]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms 5-HT2A agonism on neocortical pyramidal cells but does not address neural entropy, DMN disruption, thalamocortical gating, or global connectivity. These specific neural effects are not verifiable from this abstract.

Agonists or partial agonists at 5-HT2A receptors on neocortical pyramidal cells.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedBrogaard (2013) reviewed evidence that serotonin system perturbation — particularly 5-HT₂A agonism — can induce cross-modal binding and synesthetic experiences through disinhibition of normally segregated sensory processing streams.[11]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms serotonergic hyperactivity inducing synesthesia via disinhibited feedback mechanisms increasing connectedness of sensory brain regions.

Excessive serotonin increases excitability and connectedness of sensory brain regions via direct projection and disinhibited feedback mechanisms.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveSerotonergic psychedelics are classified as psychoplastogens — compounds that promote structural and functional neural plasticity through mechanisms including BDNF release, TrkB activation, and mTOR signaling[4]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract does not mention psychoplastogens, BDNF, TrkB, or mTOR. These plasticity mechanisms are not discussed in the abstract and would need to be confirmed in the full Nichols review.

Agonists or partial agonists at 5-HT2A receptors on neocortical pyramidal cells. Physiologically safe, not dependence-forming.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

pharmacokinetic detail5 claims2verified3inconclusive
inconclusiveThe compound's oral activity is established qualitatively and attributed to steric protection of the amine nitrogen by the bulky N,N-diisopropyl groups, which reduces first-pass deamination by MAO-A sufficiently to permit systemic absorption.[2]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms oral activity qualitatively but does not describe the MAO-A steric protection mechanism. The mechanistic attribution would be in the full text.

Reports oral activity and CNS effects.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveThe compound's oral activity is established qualitatively and attributed to steric protection of the amine nitrogen by the bulky N,N-diisopropyl groups, which reduces first-pass deamination by MAO-A sufficiently to permit systemic absorption.[5]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract focuses on CYP2D6 metabolism; MAO-A steric protection mechanism is not discussed in the abstract.

Reviews biotransformations and DDIs of indolealkylamine drugs.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedFor comparative context, the closely related 4-hydroxy analogue (4-OH-DiPT, studied as prodrug RE104) shows a plasma half-life of approximately 40 minutes following subcutaneous administration in rats[13]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 40 min half-life after s.c. administration in rats for RE104 (4-OH-DiPT prodrug).

RE104 prodrug of 4-OH-DiPT. Half-life 40 min after s.c. in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveHuman pharmacokinetic data for RE104 (subcutaneous) from the Phase 1 study demonstrate a short psychedelic duration of 2–3 hours[14]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is a Phase 1 human study with PK/PD characterization but does not specifically state the 2–3 hour duration. This specific finding would need the full text.

First formal human evaluation of RE104, a prodrug of 4-OH-DiPT (4-hydroxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine). Safety, PK, PD characterized.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedClass-level data indicate that indolealkylamine drugs are substrates for CYP2D6, with CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism identified as a risk factor for pharmacokinetic variability and drug-drug interactions[5]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6 as primary metabolic enzyme, polymorphism as additional risk factor, and DDIs at the pharmacokinetic level.

CYP2D6 plays important polymorphic role in metabolism of IAA drugs of abuse. CYP2D6 polymorphism represents additional risk factor. DDIs can occur at pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

effects overview1 claim1verified
verifiedWhere psilocybin and LSD reshape the visual field and emotional landscape, DiPT leaves vision largely untouched and instead restructures auditory reality — a dissociation between sensory modalities that is pharmacologically unique within the 5-HT₂A agonist class.[7]model confidence 96%
Verified

Abstract directly contrasts visual effects of serotonergic hallucinogens (LSD, DMT) with DiPT's auditory distortions, confirming the sensory modality dissociation.

Serotonergic hallucinogens such as LSD and DMT produce distinctive visual effects, whereas the synthetic hallucinogen N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (DiPT) is known for its production of auditory distortions.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

safety14 claims8verified6inconclusive
inconclusiveNo published case reports of organ damage, overdose, or serious adverse events specifically attributable to DiPT were identified in comprehensive toxicology reviews of the tryptamine class.[15]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract is a tryptamine toxicology review that highlights 5-MeO-DiPT, 5-MeO-DALT, and DMT as most prevalent, but does not specifically confirm or deny the absence of DiPT-specific adverse event reports.

Review of tryptamine toxicology, analytical methods. 5-MeO-DiPT, 5-MeO-DALT and DMT most prevalent.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveNo published case reports of organ damage, overdose, or serious adverse events specifically attributable to DiPT were identified in comprehensive toxicology reviews of the tryptamine class.[16]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract describes a comprehensive tryptamine review covering toxicology, but doesn't specifically confirm the absence of DiPT adverse event data. The negative finding requires full-text verification.

Review of NPS tryptamines covering structure, pharmacology, recreational use, toxicology, and analytical methods.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedThe closest adverse event data within the N,N-diisopropyltryptamine structural class comes from 5-MeO-DiPT, whose 5-methoxy analogue caused rhabdomyolysis and transient acute renal failure in a 23-year-old male following ingestion[17]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly and precisely confirms the 5-MeO-DiPT case, rhabdomyolysis, transient acute renal failure, and 23-year-old male.

5-MeO-DiPT ('Foxy Methoxy') hallucinogenic tryptamine ingestion by a 23-year-old male resulted in rhabdomyolysis and transient acute renal failure.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedTryptamine class adverse effects include tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and serotonin syndrome, with morbidity described as "considerable" in a systematic review of tryptamine toxicology[15]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 'morbidity considerable.' Specific adverse effects are not listed in the abstract but are standard findings expected in a tryptamine toxicology review; the key quoted descriptor is confirmed.

Morbidity considerable.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedNichols (2016) states that serotonergic psychedelics are "generally considered physiologically safe and do not lead to dependence or addiction" at typical doses, a class-level assessment that applies to DiPT with the caveat that no substance-specific safety data exist.[4]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract confirms the substance of the Nichols statement — physiologically safe and not dependence-forming. The exact quoted wording may differ in the full text but the meaning is confirmed.

Physiologically safe, not dependence-forming.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveStandard 5-HT₂A-mediated psychological risks apply: anxiety, panic, paranoid ideation, and ego dissolution with potential for acute psychotic episodes, particularly in individuals with predisposition to psychotic disorders[4]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract mentions 5-HT2A agonism on neocortical pyramidal cells but does not enumerate specific psychological risks. These details likely appear in the full review but cannot be confirmed from the abstract.

Agonists or partial agonists at 5-HT2A receptors on neocortical pyramidal cells.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedTolerance to DiPT's effects is expected to develop rapidly following the class-level mechanism established for serotonergic psychedelics: repeated administration causes downregulation of 5-HT₂A receptors in the frontal cortex[18]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract confirms that repeated LSD dosing decreases 5-HT2 binding in cortex, establishing the class-level tolerance mechanism through 5-HT2 downregulation.

Daily LSD administration decreases 5-HT2 binding in cortex within 3 days but not after single dose. Psilocybin also reduces 5-HT2 binding.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedTolerance to DiPT's effects is expected to develop rapidly following the class-level mechanism established for serotonergic psychedelics: repeated administration causes downregulation of 5-HT₂A receptors in the frontal cortex[6]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 5-HT2A downregulation in frontal cortex as the mechanism for tolerance development.

Repeated DOI induces HTR tolerance and cross-tolerance with LSD via 5-HT2A downregulation in frontal cortex, independent of beta-arrestin-2.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedCross-tolerance with other serotonergic psychedelics — including LSD, psilocybin, DMT, and mescaline — is expected through the shared 5-HT₂A downregulation mechanism.[6]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms cross-tolerance with LSD via 5-HT2A downregulation. Extension to psilocybin, DMT, and mescaline is a reasonable inference from the shared receptor mechanism, though only LSD is named in the abstract.

Repeated DOI induces HTR tolerance and cross-tolerance with LSD via 5-HT2A downregulation in frontal cortex.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedSerotonergic psychedelics are classified as non-dependence-forming[4]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly states 'not dependence-forming.'

Physiologically safe, not dependence-forming.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveDrug interactions with indolealkylamine drugs "occur additively at the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels, leading to severe or even fatal serotonin toxicity".[5]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DDIs at PK/PD levels leading to serotonin toxicity, but the specific quoted words 'additively' and 'severe or even fatal' do not appear in the abstract. These may be direct quotes from the full text.

DDIs can occur at pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels leading to serotonin toxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveDrug interactions with indolealkylamine drugs "occur additively at the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels, leading to severe or even fatal serotonin toxicity".[19]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the paper evaluates serotonin toxicity and DDI risks, but the specific quoted language ('additively,' 'severe or even fatal') is not in the abstract and cannot be verified without the full text.

Evaluates potential risks of drug-drug interactions and serotonin toxicity between serotonergic psychedelics and SSRIs/serotonergic drugs used in psychiatric treatment.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedPharmacokinetic interaction through shared CYP2D6 metabolism is also possible.[5]model confidence 96%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6 metabolism of indolealkylamine drugs and PKinteractions.

CYP2D6 plays important polymorphic role in metabolism of IAA drugs of abuse. DDIs can occur at pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveSerotonergic drug-drug interaction risk exists with tricyclic antidepressants through both pharmacodynamic (serotonin potentiation) and pharmacokinetic (CYP2D6 competition) mechanisms.[19]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract mentions SSRIs and serotonergic drugs in psychiatric treatment but does not specifically name tricyclic antidepressants. TCA-specific data would need to be confirmed in the full text.

Evaluates potential risks of drug-drug interactions and serotonin toxicity between serotonergic psychedelics and SSRIs/serotonergic drugs used in psychiatric treatment.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

clinical evidence3 claims2verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveThe entirety of published human data derives from Shulgin's self-experimentation and small-group trials documented in 1980 and 1997.[2]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is the first published scientific report (1980), consistent with the claim. The '1997' publication and 'entirety' characterization cannot be confirmed from this abstract alone.

First published scientific report on DiPT human pharmacology.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedBryson and colleagues (2024) published preclinical characterization demonstrating serotonergic psychedelic activity and antidepressant-like effects in rodent behavioral models.[13]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract confirms psychedelic effects and significant antidepressant effect in the forced swim test (rodent behavioral model) for RE104 (4-OH-DiPT prodrug).

Short-duration (2-3h) psychedelic effects. Significant antidepressant effect in forced swim test.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedLudbrook and colleagues (2025) reported a Phase 1 single-ascending-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subcutaneous RE104 in healthy volunteers[14]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract confirms first formal human evaluation of RE104 with safety, PK, and PD characterization. Paper title explicitly states 'Double-Blind, Randomized, Single Ascending Dose Placebo-Controlled Study.'

First formal human evaluation of RE104, a prodrug of 4-OH-DiPT (4-hydroxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine). Safety, PK, PD characterized.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

comparative pharmacology5 claims4verified1inconclusive
verifiedThis potency reduction tracks with McKenna and colleagues' binding data showing that substituent size beyond N,N-diisopropyl produces marked affinity loss at both 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₁A.[8]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms that groups larger than N,N-diisopropyl result in marked reduction in affinity at 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A.

groups larger than N,N-diisopropyl result in marked reduction in affinity at 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A recognition sites.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedGatch and colleagues (2021) demonstrated that N,N-diisopropyl compounds are consistently less potent hallucinogens than dimethyl, diethyl, N-methyl-N-ethyl, and N-methyl-N-isopropyl tryptamines in DOM discrimination assays[9]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms N,N-diisopropyl compounds less potent than dimethyl and diethyl counterparts. N-methyl-N-ethyl and N-methyl-N-isopropyl comparators are not specifically named but core finding supported.

N,N-diisopropyl compounds less potent than dimethyl, diethyl counterparts.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedCarbonaro and colleagues (2013) explicitly note that DiPT "is known for its production of auditory distortions," a characteristic not shared by other tryptamines tested in the same discrimination paradigm[7]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract contains the exact quoted phrase and contrasts DiPT's auditory distortions with the visual effects of other serotonergic hallucinogens.

the synthetic hallucinogen N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (DiPT) is known for its production of auditory distortions.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

inconclusiveHurst and Bajo (2026) attribute this selectivity to DiPT's particular interaction with 5-HT₂A receptors in auditory cortical circuits and tonotopic processing networks.[3]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms Hurst and Bajo proposed neural mechanisms for DiPT's frequency-selective effect, but does not specifically mention 'tonotopic processing networks' or 'auditory cortical circuits.' These mechanistic specifics are not in the abstract.

Hurst and Bajo propose the neural mechanisms for this effect and its use as potential therapeutic for tinnitus.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

verifiedCritically, 5-MeO-DiPT has a documented adverse event profile — including a published case of rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure in a 23-year-old male — that DiPT lacks, though this absence likely reflects lower prevalence rather than lower intrinsic risk.[17]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract confirms the 5-MeO-DiPT case with rhabdomyolysis and renal failure in a 23-year-old. The interpretive commentary about DiPT is not from this paper, but the factual basis (5-MeO-DiPT adverse event) is confirmed.

5-MeO-DiPT ('Foxy Methoxy') hallucinogenic tryptamine ingestion by a 23-year-old male resulted in rhabdomyolysis and transient acute renal failure.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026

05

Coverage & Gaps

effect links
36 links · 36 approved · 19 audited0/36 with evidence basis
06

Research Trail

substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 26, 2026

StepSourceQueryResults
1database lookupPubChemDiPT1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary chemical identity verification

2literature searchPubMedDiPT diisopropyltryptamine pharmacology15 results, 4 selected
selection rationale

Direct pharmacological relevance to DiPT class or analogues

3literature searchOpenAlexDiPT N,N-diisopropyltryptamine psychedelic74 results, 5 selected
selection rationale

High-citation landmark papers covering tryptamine receptor pharmacology and toxicology

4clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.govdiisopropyltryptamine DiPT0 results, 0 selected
selection rationale

N/A - no results

5literature searchPubMedN,N-diisopropyltryptamine auditory psychedelic effects3 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Only two papers directly studying DiPT's pharmacological and neural effects

6literature searchPubMedtryptamine serotonin receptor binding affinity substituted Shulgin2 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Comparative tryptamine receptor pharmacology

7literature searchPubMedtryptamine hallucinogen serotonin 5-HT2A receptor binding N-diisopropyl1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Critical binding affinity data directly relevant to DiPT pharmacology

8literature searchPubMedserotonin syndrome MAOI tryptamine interaction serotonin toxicity psychedelic1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Drug interactions and serotonin toxicity relevant to DiPT safety

9legal status searchFederal Register / WebSearchDiPT N,N-diisopropyltryptamine legal status scheduling DEA analog act10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Critical legal status finding - DiPT is currently unscheduled despite DEA attempt

10document retrievalErowid / TiHKALDiPT TiHKAL entry synthesis dosage effects1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary source for DiPT synthesis history and effects from Shulgin

11legal status searchWebSearch / UK Isomer DesignUK Misuse of Drugs Act tryptamine generic definition DiPT1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Legal status confirmation for UK

12legal status searchWebSearchDiPT Australia schedule 9 Canada controlled substance5 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Legal status across major jurisdictions

13web searchWebSearch / Purdue ArchivesShulgin 1981 diisopropyltryptamine paper published journal10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Discovery and publication history of DiPT

14document retrievalPMC4194234DiPT tryptamine receptor binding transporter data1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Critical specific pharmacological data for DiPT receptor profile - flags discrepancy with seed data 5-HT1A agonist claim

15document retrievalPMC4194234 / Blough 2014DiPT tryptamine receptor binding transporter EC50 Ki values1 result, 3 selected
selection rationale

Only published paper with quantitative DiPT-specific receptor data

16literature searchPubMedserotonin toxicity MAOI tryptamine interaction; psychedelic dependence addiction2 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Drug interactions and tolerance mechanisms applicable to DiPT class

17data extractionMultiple sources cross-referenceDuration discrepancy DiPT: TiHKAL (6-8h) vs seed data (3-6h) vs community sources3 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Duration discrepancy requires editorial review; TiHKAL as primary human source suggests 6-8h may be more accurate

18literature searchPubMed/OpenAlexBrogaard synesthesia serotonergic; tryptamine MAO metabolism oral activity; RE104 4-OH-DiPT clinical5 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Synesthesia mechanism relevant to DiPT auditory effects; RE104/4-OH-DiPT data provides closest analogue clinical context

Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: DiPT (N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine)

**PSX ID:** PSX-0165 | **Slug:** dipt | **Generation Provenance:** aa957ff6-c78f-4184-86fc-37d614eca6ad
**Research completed:** 2026-04-26 | **Substance readiness:** sparse (< 0.3) — DiPT is a minimally studied research chemical with no controlled human trials

---

## Chemical Identity

**Verified via PubChem CID 26903** (api_verified):

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Molecular formula | C16H24N2 |
| Molecular weight | 244.37 g/mol |
| IUPAC name | N-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-N-propan-2-ylpropan-2-amine |
| InChIKey | ZRVAAGAZUWXRIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| CAS number | 14780-24-6 |
| PubChem CID | 26903 |
| Free base melting point | 72–74 °C |
| HCl salt melting point | 192–193 °C |
| Distillation range | 170–185 °C at 0.05 mmHg |

The systematic IUPAC name and molecular formula in the brief's seed data match PubChem exactly. The brief's CID, SMILES, and InChIKey fields were blank — these are now verified and provided above. CAS number 14780-24-6 confirmed via multiple reagent supplier records (Cayman Chemical, Bertin Bioreagent).

DiPT is a **substituted tryptamine**: an indole ring bearing a 2-aminoethyl sidechain, with both hydrogen atoms on the terminal amine replaced by isopropyl groups. It is an isomeric positional variant of DPT (N,N-dipropyltryptamine, which carries n-propyl rather than i-propyl groups).

---

## Pharmacology

### Receptor Profile

The most specific published pharmacological data for DiPT comes from Blough et al. (2014 [Ref 12]), which tested DiPT (listed as compound 22) in functional assays at serotonin receptors and in transporter binding assays. Key findings:

| Target | Value | Assay |
|---|---|---|
| 5-HT2A (functional, IP1 mobilization) | EC50 = **33.5 ± 1.5 nM** | Full agonist (110% intrinsic efficacy vs. 5-HT) |
| 5-HT1A | **Inactive at 10 µM** | IP1 mobilization |
| 5-HT2A β-arrestin recruitment | **>10,000 nM** (no recruitment) | BRET assay |
| SERT (serotonin transporter) | IC50 = **288 ± 2.3 nM** | Uptake inhibition |
| DAT (dopamine transporter) | IC50 = **4,788 ± 416 nM** | Release assay |
| NET (norepinephrine transporter) | **>10,000 nM** | Inactive |

**⚠️ FLAG — 5-HT1A classification error in seed data:** The brief lists "Serotonin 1A receptor agonist" as a pharmacological class for DiPT. Blough et al. (2014 [Ref 12]) found DiPT inactive at 5-HT1A at concentrations up to 10 µM. This contradicts the seed data classification. The 5-HT1A agonist classification should be removed from the pharmacological class. (Note: 5-MeO-DiPT, the 5-methoxy analogue, *does* have 5-HT1A activity — the 5-methoxy substitution is required for that activity, as reviewed in Reckweg et al. 2022.)

**5-HT2A full agonism and biased signaling:** DiPT acts as a full agonist at 5-HT2A (110% efficacy, exceeding the reference agonist 5-HT), yet shows no β-arrestin2 recruitment at this receptor at concentrations up to 10 µM (Blough et al. 2014 [Ref 12]). This G-protein-biased agonist profile at 5-HT2A is pharmacologically notable and shares characteristics with other tryptamine hallucinogens at this receptor.

**SERT inhibition:** DiPT inhibits the serotonin transporter (IC50 288 nM), which may contribute to serotonergic activity beyond direct receptor agonism. This weak-to-moderate SERT inhibition is consistent with Blough et al. (2014 [Ref 12]) noting that multiple neurochemical mechanisms beyond 5-HT2A agonism operate across the tryptamine class.

**N,N-diisopropyl substituent effects on binding affinity:** McKenna et al. (1990 [Ref 3]) evaluated binding affinities of 21 indolealkylamine derivatives at 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, finding that "the size of the N,N-dialkyl substituent was a secondary determinant of affinity, with groups larger than N,N-diisopropyl resulting in a marked reduction in affinity at both the 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A recognition sites." This means DiPT (N,N-diisopropyl) represents the boundary case: substituents of this size already reduce receptor affinity compared to smaller groups (N,N-dimethyl, N,N-diethyl), consistent with Gatch et al. (2021 [Ref 9]) finding that "N,N-diisopropyl compounds were less potent than the dimethyl, diethyl, N-methyl-N-ethyl, and N-methyl-N-isopropyl compounds" in a DOM discrimination model.

**Discriminative stimulus pharmacology:** Carbonaro et al. (2013 [Ref 2]) conducted the only published animal pharmacology study directly evaluating DiPT, using a DOM (2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine) drug discrimination model in rats. DiPT was confirmed to produce hallucinogen-like discriminative stimulus effects. The abstract notes the compound "is known for its production of auditory distortions," distinguishing it from 5-HT2A agonists like LSD and DMT that produce primarily visual effects.

### Mechanism of Auditory Selectivity

Hurst and Bajo (2026 [Ref 1]) published the first mechanistic hypothesis for DiPT's distinctive frequency-selective pitch distortion ("diptogenia"). The paper proposes neural mechanisms by which 5-HT2A receptor agonism in auditory cortical circuits, combined with DiPT's particular binding profile, preferentially disrupts tonotopic processing in ways that shift pitch perception downward. The paper also discusses potential therapeutic application for tinnitus — representing a novel proposed use case in the emerging psychedelic therapeutics landscape.

### Oral Bioavailability

DiPT is notably orally active without co-administration of an MAOI, unlike simpler tryptamines such as DMT. The standard explanation at the class level (Yu 2008 [Ref 7]) is that bulky N-substituents provide steric protection against first-pass deamination by monoamine oxidase (MAO), particularly MAO-A. The N,N-diisopropyl groups in DiPT are large enough to significantly reduce MAO substrate activity. This is consistent with Shulgin and Carter (1980 [Ref 23]) explicitly describing DiPT as an "orally active" tryptamine analog, contrasting it implicitly with DMT.

### CYP450 Metabolism

No DiPT-specific metabolism studies have been published. Class-level data from Yu (2008 [Ref 7]) indicates that indolealkylamine drugs of abuse are substrates for CYP2D6, with CYP2D6 polymorphism representing a risk factor for variable pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. For structurally related 5-methoxy-N,N-dialkyl tryptamines (e.g., 5-MeO-2-Me-DIPT), Caspar et al. (2018) identified CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 involvement in hydroxylation, with CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 responsible for N-dealkylation — metabolism profiles that likely generalize to DiPT. No published human PK parameters (Tmax, t½, bioavailability) exist for DiPT specifically.

---

## History

### First Synthesis

DiPT was first prepared in the scientific literature by R.B. Barlow and colleagues approximately 1959. This represents the earliest chemical documentation of the compound, though no psychoactive properties were characterized in that work.

### First Human Pharmacology

Alexander Shulgin conducted the first human trials of DiPT beginning in 1975. The findings were co-published with Michael F. Carter in 1980 as: **Shulgin AT, Carter MF (1980). "N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine (DIPT) and 5-Methoxy-N,N-Diisopropyltryptamine (5-MEO-DIPT). Two Orally Active Tryptamine Analogs with CNS Activity." *Communications in Psychopharmacology*, 4(5):363–369.** [PMID 6949674, Ref 23]. This paper constitutes the primary published human pharmacology report for DiPT. The abstract is not available in the PubMed record; the full text is referenced at the Purdue University Archives (Shulgin Archive).

Shulgin documented DiPT in further detail in his 1997 book *TiHKAL: Tryptamines I Have Known and Loved* (co-authored with Ann Shulgin) as Entry #4 [Ref 16]. The TiHKAL entry describes two synthesis routes, detailed chemical characterization, dosage titration from personal experimentation, and first-person accounts of the auditory effects.

### Research Chemical Market

DiPT appeared in research chemical markets in the late 1990s and early 2000s, associated with the broader emergence of unscheduled tryptamine analogues. Unlike its 5-methoxy analogue (5-MeO-DiPT, "Foxy Methoxy"), which received significant law enforcement attention, DiPT remained a lower-profile compound and was not specifically scheduled in most jurisdictions at that time.

---

## Subjective Effects

Published descriptions come from two primary sources: Shulgin's self-experimentation documented in TiHKAL [Ref 16, 23] (human, n=small group) and the Erowid experience vault [Ref 19] (user reports). Animal pharmacology from Carbonaro et al. (2013 [Ref 2]) confirms the compound produces hallucinogen-like discriminative stimulus effects in rats. Hurst and Bajo (2026 [Ref 1]) contextualize the effects within a mechanistic framework.

**Auditory effects (primary and distinctive):**
- Downward pitch shift affecting all heard sounds — voices, music, and environmental noise sound lower in pitch than normal ("the auditory world of the subject sounds lower in pitch than in a sober state of consciousness" — Hurst & Bajo 2026 [Ref 1])
- Musical disharmony: chords and melodies sound discordant because the shift is not uniform across frequencies, distorting harmonic relationships
- Single pure tones may be perceived relatively normally, while complex sounds (speech, music) are markedly distorted
- Auditory hallucinations (at higher doses) — consistent with effects taxonomy in brief
- Auditory enhancement at lower doses before distortion onset

**Visual and other perceptual effects:**
- Visual effects are notably minimal at typical doses — this distinguishes DiPT from most other psychedelic tryptamines
- At higher doses, mild geometric patterns and visual drifting have been reported (consistent with brief taxonomy)
- Some reports of synesthesia (consistent with serotonergic mechanism — Brogaard 2013 [Ref 20])

**Somatic effects:**
- Nausea (commonly reported, especially oral administration)
- Stimulation and wakefulness
- Spontaneous body sensations
- Pupil dilation (consistent with serotonergic effects)
- Some reports of abnormal heartbeat/tachycardia
- Yawning
- Stomach bloating and gastrointestinal discomfort

**Cognitive effects:**
- Thought acceleration and analysis enhancement reported at mild doses
- Ego dissolution at high doses
- Confusion documented

**Duration data (source comparison):**
- **TiHKAL [Ref 16] (primary human source, Shulgin):** Duration 6–8 hours (oral), onset not specified but implied ~30-60 min
- **Seed brief:** Total 3–6 hours (oral), onset 30–60 min, aftereffects 2–4 hours
- **Community consensus (web sources):** Onset 30–60 minutes; 3–6 hours commonly reported; some report up to 8 hours
- **Animal model (Carbonaro 2013 [Ref 2], IP rodent):** Onset within 5 min, effects resolved within 4 hours — *note: IP rodent pharmacokinetics differ significantly from oral human administration; these data cannot be directly translated*
- ⚠️ **FLAG — Duration discrepancy:** TiHKAL (primary source) specifies 6–8 hours, while the seed brief states 3–6 hours. Community reports span both ranges. The discrepancy may reflect dose-dependency (higher doses approaching 100 mg lasting 6–8h; lower doses lasting 3–5h). Recommend editorial review; the generation agent should present a dose-dependent range and flag TiHKAL as primary source.

**Smoked ROA:**
- Onset: 5–15 minutes
- Duration: 15–60 minutes total
- TiHKAL reports 8 mg as an active smoked dose [Ref 16]
- Effects are similar in character but shorter duration and faster onset vs. oral

---

## Safety & Toxicity

### Lethal Dose / LD50
No published LD50 or lethal dose data for DiPT in any species. The toxic dose in humans is unknown. This is consistent with the brief's "toxic dose is unknown" notation and is a safety-critical gap.

### Human Adverse Events
No published case reports of adverse events or overdoses specifically attributable to DiPT were found in PubMed, Malaca et al. (2020 [Ref 6]) tryptamine toxicology review, or Tittarelli et al. (2015 [Ref 5]) recreational tryptamine review. This likely reflects the compound's low prevalence of use rather than an absence of adverse potential. No deaths attributed to DiPT have been reported in the published literature.

⚠️ **FLAG:** Absence of adverse event data should not be interpreted as safety confirmation. All safety data is class-level inference.

### Analogue Adverse Events (for class context)
- 5-MeO-DiPT (5-methoxy analogue) has caused rhabdomyolysis and transient acute renal failure following ingestion in a 23-year-old male (Alatrash et al. 2006 [Ref not yet in registry — PMID 16610577]). This represents a serious adverse event in the N,N-diisopropyltryptamine class.
- Tryptamine class adverse effects include tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and serotonin syndrome (Malaca et al. 2020 [Ref 6]).
- The morbidity accompanying tryptamine intake is described as "considerable" (Malaca et al. 2020 [Ref 6]).

### Physiological Safety at Typical Doses
Nichols (2016 [Ref 14]) states that serotonergic psychedelics are "generally considered physiologically safe and do not lead to dependence or addiction" at typical doses. This class-level statement applies with the caveat that DiPT lacks its own safety data.

### Psychological Risks
- Risk of anxiety, panic, and dysphoria inherent to 5-HT2A-mediated psychedelic states [Nichols 2016, Ref 14]
- The unusual auditory distortion profile may be psychologically disturbing, particularly in unfamiliar settings
- No published HPPD (Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder) cases specifically attributed to DiPT

---

## Harm Reduction

### MAOI Contraindication
DiPT is a serotonergic compound with SERT inhibition (288 nM) and 5-HT2A full agonism. Co-administration with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), including irreversible MAOIs (e.g., phenelzine, tranylcypromine), reversible MAOIs (e.g., moclobemide), and naturally occurring MAOIs (e.g., harmaline in ayahuasca) creates elevated serotonin syndrome risk. Yu (2008 [Ref 7]) and Malcolm & Thomas (2022 [Ref 8]) both emphasize that DDIs with indolealkylamine drugs of abuse can "occur additively at the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic levels, leading to severe or even fatal serotonin toxicity."

**Note on MAO resistance:** Although DiPT itself is orally active (unlike DMT, which requires MAO inhibition), the N,N-diisopropyl groups reduce but do not eliminate MAO substrate activity. Combining DiPT with an MAOI could still amplify serotonergic load through MAOI's effect on endogenous serotonin metabolism and potential blockade of residual DiPT deamination.

### SSRI/Serotonergic Drug Interactions
Psychedelic use with concurrent SSRIs/SNRIs presents both pharmacodynamic interactions (additive serotonergic load) and pharmacokinetic interactions via shared CYP2D6 metabolism (Yu 2008 [Ref 7]; Malcolm & Thomas 2022 [Ref 8]).

### Testing
DiPT will produce a **positive Ehrlich test** (purple/violet) confirming indole structure. Hofmann reagent provides a green-blue color for tryptamines. These reagents do not distinguish DiPT from other tryptamines but confirm the presence of an indole ring. Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is required for definitive identification.

### Contraindications
No published DiPT-specific contraindications. Class-level contraindications from serotonergic psychedelic literature include:
- Personal or family history of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders
- Lithium use (reported seizure risk with psychedelic tryptamines in case reports)
- MAOI co-administration (serotonin syndrome risk)
- Cardiovascular disease (tachycardia, hypertension risk)
- Pregnancy (unknown teratogenic risk; no published data)

---

## Tolerance & Dependence

### Tolerance Mechanism
No DiPT-specific tolerance studies have been published. Class-level mechanism established by Buckholtz et al. (1990 [Ref 24]) and de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022 [Ref 15]): repeated serotonergic psychedelic administration causes downregulation of 5-HT2A receptors in the frontal cortex, reducing subsequent response. This mechanism is 5-HT2A activation-dependent and independent of β-arrestin-2. Notably, DiPT shows no β-arrestin recruitment at 5-HT2A (Blough et al. 2014 [Ref 12]) — whether this affects tolerance development is unknown.

**Seed data (not independently verified for DiPT specifically):**
- Buildup: almost immediately after ingestion
- Half-life of tolerance: ~3 days
- Full reset: ~7 days
- These values are consistent with cross-psychedelic class data but are not confirmed by a published DiPT-specific study.

### Cross-Tolerance
Serotonergic psychedelics share cross-tolerance mediated by shared 5-HT2A downregulation (Nichols 2016 [Ref 14]; de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022 [Ref 15]). Cross-tolerance between DiPT and LSD, psilocybin, DMT, and other 5-HT2A agonists is expected.

### Dependence Liability
Nichols (2016 [Ref 14]) classifies serotonergic psychedelics as generally not dependence-forming. The rapid tolerance development itself limits compulsive use patterns. No published case reports of DiPT dependence or withdrawal syndrome.

---

## Interactions

### Published Drug Interaction Data
No DiPT-specific drug interaction studies exist in the published literature. The following are class-level inferences:

**MAOI — HIGH RISK:** Serotonin syndrome risk from combined 5-HT2A agonism, SERT inhibition, and MAOI-mediated serotonin accumulation. May be fatal (Yu 2008 [Ref 7]).

**Lithium — ELEVATED RISK:** Case reports associate lithium + classical psychedelic combinations with seizures and increased psychological disturbance. Mechanism not fully elucidated.

**SSRIs/SNRIs — INTERACTION:** Pharmacodynamic blunting of psychedelic effects (5-HT2A downregulation from chronic SSRI use), combined with additive serotonergic load risk at pharmacodynamic level. CYP2D6 competition possible at pharmacokinetic level (Yu 2008 [Ref 7]).

**Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs):** Serotonergic DDI risk (Malcolm & Thomas 2022 [Ref 8]).

**Other serotonergic psychedelics:** Cross-tolerance but also potential for additive serotonergic effects.

---

## Legal Status

### United States
DiPT is **not federally scheduled** as of April 2026. The DEA published a proposed rule (87 FR 2376, January 14, 2022 [Ref 11]) to place DiPT in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act alongside 4-OH-DiPT, 5-MeO-AMT, 5-MeO-MiPT, and 5-MeO-DET. The DEA subsequently **withdrew this proposed rule on July 27, 2022** (87 FR 45290 [Ref 10]), citing the need for new HHS scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation. The public hearing scheduled for August 22, 2022 was cancelled. DiPT remains potentially subject to the **Federal Analog Act** (21 U.S.C. § 813) if sold or possessed for human consumption with substantially similar pharmacological effects to a Schedule I or II substance.

**⚠️ FLAG for editorial review:** Legal status may change. The HHS review process initiated following the 2022 withdrawal could result in a new scheduling recommendation at any time.

### United Kingdom
DiPT is a **Class A controlled substance** under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 under the tryptamine generic catch-all clause. The generic definition covers any compound structurally derived from tryptamine with N,N-dialkyl substitution; DiPT (N,N-diisopropyltryptamine) is explicitly cited as an example compound in the legislative reference materials [Ref 18].

### Australia
DiPT is a **Schedule 9 (Prohibited Substance)** under Australia's Poisons Standard (Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons). Possession and supply are prohibited without a government-issued licence; research use requires special authorization.

### Canada
DiPT is **not explicitly listed** under Canada's Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). Its status may be subject to interpretation as a tryptamine analogue in enforcement contexts, though no explicit scheduling has been confirmed.

### New Zealand
DiPT is a **Class C controlled drug** as a tryptamine analogue of DMT under New Zealand's Misuse of Drugs Act.

### European Union
No EU-wide scheduling; legal status varies by member state. DiPT is not among the substances specifically scheduled by the EMCDDA early warning system based on available records.

---

## Clinical Trials

No clinical trials involving DiPT itself are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the published literature.

**Related compound — 4-OH-DiPT (via RE104 prodrug):**
- RE104 (glutarate ester prodrug of 4-hydroxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine) has entered clinical development as a potential therapeutic for depressive disorders.
- Bryson et al. (2024 [Ref 22]) published preclinical characterization. Ludbrook et al. (2025 [Ref 21]) published Phase 1 SAD human data. 4-OH-DiPT via RE104 shows a 2–3 hour psychedelic duration and preclinical antidepressant activity.
- These data are not directly applicable to DiPT but demonstrate that the N,N-diisopropyltryptamine pharmacophore is of active clinical interest.

---

## Community Feedback Analysis

No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief.

---

## Gaps & Flags

### Safety-Critical Values Not Confirmed by Published Sources
1. **Lethal/toxic dose:** Unknown for DiPT in any species. The brief's note "toxic dose is unknown" is confirmed. ⚠️ SAFETY FLAG.
2. **Duration (oral):** TiHKAL (primary source, Shulgin 1980/1997) states **6–8 hours**; seed brief states **3–6 hours**. This discrepancy is unresolved. The 3–6 hour figure appears in community-sourced references; the 6–8 hour figure is from the originator's documented human trials. Recommend presenting dose-dependent range with TiHKAL as primary source. ⚠️ EDITORIAL FLAG.

### Contradictions Between Seed Data and Published Sources
3. **5-HT1A pharmacological class:** Seed data lists "Serotonin 1A receptor agonist" as a pharmacological class for DiPT. Blough et al. (2014 [Ref 12]) reports DiPT INACTIVE at 5-HT1A at concentrations up to 10 µM. This is a direct contradiction. The 5-HT1A classification likely originated from its analogy with 5-MeO-DiPT (which does have 5-HT1A activity) and should be removed. ⚠️ DATA CORRECTION FLAG.

### Missing Chemical Identity Fields
4. **SMILES, InChIKey, PubChem CID, molecular formula, molecular weight** were not populated in the brief. All are now verified: CID 26903; Formula C16H24N2; MW 244.37; InChIKey ZRVAAGAZUWXRIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N. SMILES can be retrieved from PubChem CID 26903.

### Areas Relying on Structural Analogy or Class Inference
5. **Metabolism/CYP enzymes:** No DiPT-specific metabolism data published. All metabolic pathway inferences are class-level (indolealkylamine class; CYP2D6 likely involved per Yu 2008).
6. **Tolerance buildup rate (3-day half-life, 7-day reset):** Seed data not confirmed by DiPT-specific studies. These values are consistent with class-level 5-HT2A downregulation data but are not substance-verified.
7. **MAOI interactions:** Class-level inference only; no DiPT-specific interaction study exists.
8. **Contraindications:** No DiPT-specific contraindication data; all from class-level psychedelic literature.
9. **Pharmocokinetics (Tmax, t½, bioavailability):** No published human PK data for DiPT exists. The 4-OH-DiPT analogue (RE104) has a 40 min half-life after SC administration in rats (Bryson 2024 [Ref 22]) but this cannot be directly applied to oral DiPT in humans.

### Absence of Published Evidence (Substance-Specific)
10. No published case reports of adverse events or overdose attributable to DiPT.
11. No registered or completed clinical trials for DiPT.
12. No neuroimaging or EEG studies in humans.
13. No controlled human dose-response studies.
14. No published studies on DiPT and long-term effects, HPPD, or psychological harm.
15. Legal status in EU member states not individually confirmed.