Skip to main content

Dextromethorphan

(+)-3-methoxy-17-methylmorphinan

Sources
44
9 strong · 26 moderate · 9 weak

Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.

Claims checked
73
53verified6partial14inconclusive

Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.

Generated
Apr 24, 2026 · pipeline-v5
Values approved
190/192 (99%)

Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.

01

Value Provenance

Dosing

oraltrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold75 mg75 mgmedium
Low100–200 mg100–200 mgmedium
Common200–400 mg200–400 mgmedium
Strong400–700 mg400–700 mgmedium
Heavy700+ mg700+ mgmedium
Editorial

Dose ranges from existing database values (brief seed data), originally sourced from community-curated pharmacological data (PsychonautWiki/Erowid consensus). No controlled human dose-response study exists. Values are pharmacologically plausible — therapeutic antitussive dose is 15-30 mg, and psychoactive effects reported at >4 mg/kg (~280 mg for 70 kg adult) in clinical literature (StatPearls). CYP2D6 poor metabolizers will experience effects at lower doses due to 30-40x higher bioavailability.

Reasoning

Dose ranges from existing database values (brief seed data), originally sourced from community-curated pharmacological data (PsychonautWiki/Erowid consensus). No controlled human dose-response study exists. Values are pharmacologically plausible — therapeutic antitussive dose is 15-30 mg, and psychoactive effects reported at >4 mg/kg (~280 mg for 70 kg adult) in clinical literature (StatPearls). CYP2D6 poor metabolizers will experience effects at lower doses due to 30-40x higher bioavailability.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Duration

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace30–120 minutes30–120 minutesmedium
Editorial

Onset 30-120 minutes from brief seed data (community consensus). Wide range reflects CYP2D6-dependent first-pass metabolism variability and formulation differences (syrup vs tablet vs powder).

Reasoning

Onset 30-120 minutes from brief seed data (community consensus). Wide range reflects CYP2D6-dependent first-pass metabolism variability and formulation differences (syrup vs tablet vs powder).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace30–60 minutes30–60 minutesmedium
Editorial

Come-up duration 30-60 minutes from community consensus. Effects build steadily after onset, with nausea typically peaking during this phase.

Reasoning

Come-up duration 30-60 minutes from community consensus. Effects build steadily after onset, with nausea typically peaking during this phase.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Peaktrace3–6 hours3–6 hoursmedium
Editorial

Peak duration 3-6 hours from brief seed data (community consensus). Consistent with dextrorphan plasma kinetics in extensive metabolizers. Poor metabolizers may experience extended peak.

Reasoning

Peak duration 3-6 hours from brief seed data (community consensus). Consistent with dextrorphan plasma kinetics in extensive metabolizers. Poor metabolizers may experience extended peak.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Offsettrace2–4 hours2–4 hoursmedium
Editorial

Offset 2-4 hours estimated from total duration minus onset/peak. Gradual resolution consistent with dextrorphan elimination half-life.

Reasoning

Offset 2-4 hours estimated from total duration minus onset/peak. Gradual resolution consistent with dextrorphan elimination half-life.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Totaltrace8–12 hours8–12 hoursmedium
Editorial

Total subjective duration 8-12 hours from brief seed data (community consensus). Strongly CYP2D6-phenotype dependent — poor metabolizers may experience subjective effects for 15-20+ hours.

Reasoning

Total subjective duration 8-12 hours from brief seed data (community consensus). Strongly CYP2D6-phenotype dependent — poor metabolizers may experience subjective effects for 15-20+ hours.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

After effectstrace4–24 hours4–24 hoursmedium
Editorial

After-effects documented up to 24 hours in brief seed data. Wide range reflects CYP2D6 variability (2-3h half-life in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs). Residual cognitive cloudiness and dissociative aftereffects.

Reasoning

After-effects documented up to 24 hours in brief seed data. Wide range reflects CYP2D6 variability (2-3h half-life in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs). Residual cognitive cloudiness and dissociative aftereffects.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Safety

Toxicity Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Acutemoderatemoderatemedium
Chronicmoderatemoderatemedium
Organs Affectedcentral_nervous_system, cardiovascular, musculoskeletalcentral_nervous_system, cardiovascular, musculoskeletalmedium
Editorial

Classified as moderate acute toxicity: wide therapeutic margin but documented seizures, status epilepticus, and serotonin syndrome at supratherapeutic doses (Okamoto 2025, Shimozawa 2023, Chyka 2007). CYP2D6 polymorphism creates unpredictable individual toxicity. Chronic toxicity classified as moderate based on case reports of psychosis, cognitive dysfunction, and dependence (Miller 2005, Mutschler 2010), but no systematic longitudinal study exists.

Reasoning

Classified as moderate acute toxicity: wide therapeutic margin but documented seizures, status epilepticus, and serotonin syndrome at supratherapeutic doses (Okamoto 2025, Shimozawa 2023, Chyka 2007). CYP2D6 polymorphism creates unpredictable individual toxicity. Chronic toxicity classified as moderate based on case reports of psychosis, cognitive dysfunction, and dependence (Miller 2005, Mutschler 2010), but no systematic longitudinal study exists.

Evidence basis: published_case_series

Dependence Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Physicallowlowmedium
Psychologicalmoderatemoderatemedium
Compulsive Redosinglowlowmedium
Dose Escalationmoderatemoderatemedium
Editorial

Dependence documented in multiple case reports (Miller 2005 — psychosis and withdrawal; Mutschler 2010 — increasing abuse cases with dependence syndrome in Germany). Physical dependence is low relative to opioids or GABAergics but withdrawal symptoms are documented. Psychological dependence is moderate, consistent with brief seed data and case literature.

Reasoning

Dependence documented in multiple case reports (Miller 2005 — psychosis and withdrawal; Mutschler 2010 — increasing abuse cases with dependence syndrome in Germany). Physical dependence is low relative to opioids or GABAergics but withdrawal symptoms are documented. Psychological dependence is moderate, consistent with brief seed data and case literature.

Evidence basis: published_case_series

Withdrawal Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Severitymildmildlow
Symptomsinsomnia, dysphoria, anxiety, craving, restlessness, cognitive impairmentinsomnia, dysphoria, anxiety, craving, restlessness, cognitive impairmentlow
FatalNoNolow
Medical SupervisionNot requiredNot requiredlow
Editorial

Withdrawal documented in case reports (Miller 2005) as consistent with NMDA antagonist discontinuation. Symptoms are primarily psychological. Not life-threatening. Specific timing parameters are estimated from case descriptions, not controlled studies.

Reasoning

Withdrawal documented in case reports (Miller 2005) as consistent with NMDA antagonist discontinuation. Symptoms are primarily psychological. Not life-threatening. Specific timing parameters are estimated from case descriptions, not controlled studies.

Evidence basis: published_case_series

Tolerance Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Buildupmoderatemoderatelow
Half-life5 days5 dayslow
Full Reset10 days10 dayslow
Cross-tolerancesketamine, PCP, nitrous oxide, memantineketamine, PCP, nitrous oxide, memantinelow
Editorial

Tolerance buildup and cross-tolerance with dissociatives established in community literature and consistent with NMDA antagonist pharmacology. Specific timeline values (5-day half-life, 10-day reset) from brief seed data reflecting community consensus — no primary published source found. NMDA receptor upregulation mechanism is class-established.

Reasoning

Tolerance buildup and cross-tolerance with dissociatives established in community literature and consistent with NMDA antagonist pharmacology. Specific timeline values (5-day half-life, 10-day reset) from brief seed data reflecting community consensus — no primary published source found. NMDA receptor upregulation mechanism is class-established.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Effects & Profile

Contraindications

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
other MAOI usetraceabsoluteabsolutehigh
Editorial

Absolute contraindication established in StatPearls, Chyka et al. 2007 guideline, and clinical pharmacology literature. Fatal serotonin syndrome mechanism is pharmacologically established via DXM's SERT inhibition plus MAO blockade.

Reasoning

Absolute contraindication established in StatPearls, Chyka et al. 2007 guideline, and clinical pharmacology literature. Fatal serotonin syndrome mechanism is pharmacologically established via DXM's SERT inhibition plus MAO blockade.

psychiatric serotonergic medication usetracerelativerelativehigh
Editorial

Serotonin syndrome risk with SSRIs documented in case reports (Skop et al. 1994) and clinical references (StatPearls, Miller 2005). CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine/fluoxetine creates compounded exposure.

Reasoning

Serotonin syndrome risk with SSRIs documented in case reports (Skop et al. 1994) and clinical references (StatPearls, Miller 2005). CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine/fluoxetine creates compounded exposure.

metabolic CYP2D6 poor metabolizer statustracerelativerelativehigh
Editorial

CYP2D6 pharmacogenomic variability extensively documented (Schadel 1995, Zhou 2009). Okamoto 2025 case report implicated CYP2D6 inhibition in severe overdose toxicity. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrate 30-40x bioavailability difference.

Reasoning

CYP2D6 pharmacogenomic variability extensively documented (Schadel 1995, Zhou 2009). Okamoto 2025 case report implicated CYP2D6 inhibition in severe overdose toxicity. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrate 30-40x bioavailability difference.

psychiatric psychotic disorderstracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

DXM-induced psychosis documented in case reports (Miller 2005). NMDA antagonism-induced psychosis is a well-established pharmacological phenomenon consistent with the NMDA hypofunction model.

Reasoning

DXM-induced psychosis documented in case reports (Miller 2005). NMDA antagonism-induced psychosis is a well-established pharmacological phenomenon consistent with the NMDA hypofunction model.

hepatic hepatic impairmenttracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Mechanistic inference from DXM's near-complete hepatic first-pass metabolism (1-2% oral bioavailability in EMs reflects extensive CYP2D6 metabolism). No substance-specific hepatic impairment study retrieved.

Reasoning

Mechanistic inference from DXM's near-complete hepatic first-pass metabolism (1-2% oral bioavailability in EMs reflects extensive CYP2D6 metabolism). No substance-specific hepatic impairment study retrieved.

respiratory respiratory compromisetracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Respiratory depression documented in DXM overdose presentations (StatPearls). Naloxone recommended for comatose patients with respiratory depression in Chyka 2007 guideline.

Reasoning

Respiratory depression documented in DXM overdose presentations (StatPearls). Naloxone recommended for comatose patients with respiratory depression in Chyka 2007 guideline.

pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancy and breastfeedingtracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

No pregnancy safety data at supratherapeutic doses retrieved. Lipophilicity (LogP 3.61-4.11) predicts placental transfer. Standard precautionary contraindication for substances with unknown reproductive toxicity.

Reasoning

No pregnancy safety data at supratherapeutic doses retrieved. Lipophilicity (LogP 3.61-4.11) predicts placental transfer. Standard precautionary contraindication for substances with unknown reproductive toxicity.

Timeline Phases

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace1800–7200 sec(i=0.05)1800–7200 sec(i=0.05)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace1800–3600 sec(i=0.30)1800–3600 sec(i=0.30)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Peaktrace5400–10800 sec(i=1.00)5400–10800 sec(i=1.00)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Plateautrace7200–10800 sec(i=0.55)7200–10800 sec(i=0.55)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Resolutiontrace3600–7200 sec(i=0.20)3600–7200 sec(i=0.20)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Afterglowtrace14400–86400 sec(i=0.05)14400–86400 sec(i=0.05)medium
Editorial

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Reasoning

Duration data derived from community consensus (brief: onset 30-120 min, peak 3-6h, total 8-12h, after-effects up to 24h) and pharmacological reasoning. CYP2D6 phenotype creates extreme variability — poor metabolizers experience substantially longer phases. No controlled human dose-response timing study exists. The wide afterglow range reflects the CYP2D6-dependent elimination half-life (2-3h in EMs vs 15-20h in PMs).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Dose Tier Summaries

thresholdtrace
medium

At threshold doses (~75 mg oral DXM HBr), effects are subtle: mild mood elevation, slight stimulation, and a faint sense of perceptual lightening. Music appreciation may increase marginally, and a gentle sense of physical warmth or tingling may be noticed. These effects overlap substantially with the therapeutic antitussive dose range and may not be clearly distinguishable from placebo in some individuals. Physically, mild pupil dilation and slight nausea are possible. Functional impairment is minimal, though subtle coordination changes may be detectable on formal testing.

Editorial

Threshold value of 75 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). No controlled dose-response study exists; effects described from clinical observations and community reports.

Reasoning

Threshold value of 75 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). No controlled dose-response study exists; effects described from clinical observations and community reports.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

lighttrace
medium

At light doses (100–200 mg oral DXM HBr), the first clearly psychoactive effects emerge: noticeable mood lift and euphoria, mild stimulation, enhanced music appreciation, and a growing sense of perceptual novelty. Thought patterns begin to shift — slight thought acceleration and increased associative thinking may be apparent. A mild sense of dissociation from the immediate environment develops, though reality testing remains intact. Physically, nystagmus may become apparent, along with mild nausea, slight ataxia, and a sensation of bodily lightness or floating. Sleep is difficult for several hours after ingestion. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers may experience effects closer to the common dose range from these amounts.

Editorial

Light dose range 100-200 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). StatPearls notes psychoactive effects beginning at >4 mg/kg (~280 mg for 70 kg adult), but community reports consistently describe effects at lower doses. CYP2D6 variability caveat is pharmacologically grounded.

Reasoning

Light dose range 100-200 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). StatPearls notes psychoactive effects beginning at >4 mg/kg (~280 mg for 70 kg adult), but community reports consistently describe effects at lower doses. CYP2D6 variability caveat is pharmacologically grounded.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

commontrace
medium

At common doses (200–400 mg oral DXM HBr), the dissociative character of the experience becomes unmistakable. Euphoria intensifies, often accompanied by a sense of bodily dissociation — the feeling of separation between mind and physical form. Music distortion and enhancement become prominent. Visual distortions emerge: drifting of surfaces, closed-eye visuals with geometric or abstract imagery, and altered color perception. Time distortion is marked, with subjective time typically feeling stretched. Thought disorganization increases, with dream-like or surreal cognitive patterns. Physically, pronounced nystagmus, ataxia, and motor incoordination are typical. Nausea and vomiting occur in a significant minority. Tachycardia and mild hypertension are common. Speech becomes slurred. Sleep is impossible for 6–8 hours. Functional impairment is substantial — driving or operating machinery is unsafe.

Editorial

Common dose range 200-400 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). StatPearls reports euphoria in up to 64% and nystagmus in 15% at doses >4 mg/kg. Dissociative phenomenology consistent with NMDA antagonism at dextrorphan plasma levels achieved in this range.

Reasoning

Common dose range 200-400 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). StatPearls reports euphoria in up to 64% and nystagmus in 15% at doses >4 mg/kg. Dissociative phenomenology consistent with NMDA antagonism at dextrorphan plasma levels achieved in this range.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

strongtrace
medium

At strong doses (400–700 mg oral DXM HBr), profound dissociation dominates the experience. Depersonalization and derealization become intense — sense of self may dissolve partially or fully into an abstract, dreamlike state. Out-of-body experiences, ego dissolution, and hole-like states reminiscent of high-dose ketamine are reported. Visual hallucinations become vivid and may include complex, immersive scenes. Auditory distortions are prominent. Memory suppression is severe; amnesia for portions of the experience is common. Physically, severe motor impairment renders walking dangerous or impossible. Nystagmus is pronounced. Nausea and vomiting risk increases substantially. Tachycardia and hypertension become more pronounced. Hyperthermia risk increases, particularly in warm environments or with physical exertion. The experience lasts 8–12 hours with residual effects persisting well beyond. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers may reach this intensity from lower doses.

Editorial

Strong dose range 400-700 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). Dissociative intensity at these doses reflects substantial NMDA antagonism by accumulated dextrorphan (Ki = 0.9 µM). CYP2D6 variability caveat is critical — poor metabolizers experience dramatically higher DXM exposure.

Reasoning

Strong dose range 400-700 mg from community consensus (brief seed data). Dissociative intensity at these doses reflects substantial NMDA antagonism by accumulated dextrorphan (Ki = 0.9 µM). CYP2D6 variability caveat is critical — poor metabolizers experience dramatically higher DXM exposure.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

heavytrace
medium

At heavy doses (700+ mg oral DXM HBr), the experience enters profoundly altered territory. Complete dissociation from the body and external environment is typical. Consciousness may narrow to an internal hallucinatory space with little or no awareness of the physical surroundings. Ego dissolution is near-total. Complex hallucinatory experiences — sometimes described as interdimensional or cosmic in character — may occur. Amnesia for the entire experience is common. Physically, severe ataxia, loss of motor control, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, hypertension, and hyperthermia all carry substantial risk. Seizures and respiratory depression become realistic dangers, particularly in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers or when combined with other substances. Emergency medical intervention may be necessary. These doses approach the clinical toxicity threshold (>7.5 mg/kg triggers ED referral) for an average-weight adult.

Editorial

Heavy dose range 700+ mg from community consensus (brief seed data). At these doses, clinical toxicity thresholds are approached or exceeded (Chyka et al. 2007 guideline: >7.5 mg/kg = ED referral). Seizure and respiratory depression risk documented in overdose case reports (Okamoto 2025, Shimozawa 2023).

Reasoning

Heavy dose range 700+ mg from community consensus (brief seed data). At these doses, clinical toxicity thresholds are approached or exceeded (Chyka et al. 2007 guideline: >7.5 mg/kg = ED referral). Seizure and respiratory depression risk documented in overdose case reports (Okamoto 2025, Shimozawa 2023).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

02

History

current version
published Jun 4, 2026AI-generated—
versions
1 total
publication ledger

backfill Jun 4, 2026

Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.

03

Sources

9 strong · 26 moderate · 9 weak
  1. [1]
    moderate
    Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Dextromethorphan (DXM)
    McClure EW, Daniels RN · 2023 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
    doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00088pubmed 372901174 claims checked2 verified2 inconclusive
  2. [2]
    moderate
    Binding of dimemorfan to sigma-1 receptor and anticonvulsant effects compared with dextromethorphan and dextrorphan
    Chou YC, Liao JF, Chang WY, Lin MF, Chen CF · 1999 · Brain Research
    pubmed 100648397 claims checked5 verified2 partial
  3. [3]
    moderate
    A comparison of the binding profiles of dextromethorphan, memantine, fluoxetine and amitriptyline: treatment of involuntary emotional expression disorder
    Werling LL, Keller A, Frank JG, Nuwayhid SJ · 2007 · Experimental Neurology
    pubmed 176895324 claims checked2 verified2 inconclusive
  4. [4]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan withdrawal and dependence syndrome
    Mutschler J, Koopmann A, Grosshans M, Hermann D, Mann K, Kiefer F · 2010 · Deutsches Arzteblatt International
  5. [5]
    strong
    Efficacy and safety of dextromethorphan/quinidine in treating pseudobulbar affect: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Muneer MA, Tariq I, Zulfiqar E, et al. · 2026 · Neurological Sciences
  6. [6]
    moderate
    Glutamatergic Modulators for Major Depression from Theory to Clinical Use
    McIntyre RS, Jain R · 2024 · CNS Drugs
  7. [7]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan psychosis, dependence and physical withdrawal
    Miller SC · 2005 · Addiction Biology
    pubmed 163189537 claims checked5 verified2 inconclusive
  8. [8]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan (StatPearls)
    Jaffe R et al. · 2024
    linkno claims checked
  9. [9]
    moderate
    Pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan and metabolites in humans: influence of the CYP2D6 phenotype and quinidine inhibition
    Schadel M, Wu D, Otton SV, Kalow W, Sellers EM · 1995 · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
    pubmed 75937096 claims checked3 verified1 partial2 inconclusive
  10. [10]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan ACS Molecule of the Week / Chemical history
    American Chemical Society · 2020
    linkno claims checked
  11. [11]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan regulation by U.S. jurisdiction (Wikipedia)
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  12. [12]
    moderate
    The strong clinical interaction between bupropion and CYP2D6 is primarily mediated through bupropion metabolites and their stereoisomers
    Tanaudommongkon I, Rashidian A, Gufford BT, Lu JBL, Desta Z · 2025 · Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  13. [13]
    moderate
    Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dextromethorphan: clinical and forensic aspects
    Silva AR, Dinis-Oliveira RJ · 2020 · Drug Metabolism Reviews
    doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2020.1758712pubmed 323930723 claims checked2 verified1 partial
  14. [14]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan physical properties (CAS 125-71-3)
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  15. [15]
    weak
    IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology: Dextromethorphan ligand pharmacology
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  16. [16]
    moderate
    Abuse liability of dextromethorphan and its combinatory formulation dextromethorphan/bupropion: a pharmacologic perspective
    Zheng YJ, Dri CE, Wong S, Le GH, Teopiz KM, Kwan ATH, McIntyre RS · 2026 · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
  17. [17]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan as a potential neuroprotective agent with unique mechanisms of action
    Werling LL, Lauterbach EC, Calef U · 2007 · The Neurologist
    pubmed 178488671 claim checked1 inconclusive
  18. [18]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan/quinidine sulfate for pseudobulbar affect
    Rosen H · 2008 · Drugs of Today
  19. [19]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan as a potential rapid-acting antidepressant
    Lauterbach EC · 2011 · Medical Hypotheses
  20. [20]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan and its metabolite dextrorphan block alpha3beta4 neuronal nicotinic receptors
    Hernandez SC, Bertolino M, Xiao Y, Pringle KE, Caruso FS, Kellar KJ · 2000 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    pubmed 108693982 claims checked2 verified
  21. [21]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan as calcium channel antagonists
    Carpenter CL, Marks SS, Watson DL, Greenberg DA · 1988 · Brain Research
    pubmed 24519742 claims checked2 verified
  22. [22]
    moderate
    Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 2D6 and its clinical significance: Part I
    Zhou SF · 2009 · Clinical Pharmacokinetics
    doi.org/10.2165/11318030-000000000-00000pubmed 198175012 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
  23. [23]
    strong
    Therapeutic effects of add-on low-dose dextromethorphan plus valproic acid in bipolar disorder
    Chen SL, Lee SY, Chang YH, et al. · 2014 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
  24. [24]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan provides neuroprotection via anti-inflammatory and anti-excitotoxicity effects in cortex following traumatic brain injury
    Pu B, Xue Y, Wang Q, Hua C, Li X · 2015 · Molecular Medicine Reports
  25. [25]
    moderate
    Modulating tonic NMDA receptor currents: mechanistic insights into ketamine, esketamine, and dextromethorphan for major depressive disorder
    Le GH, McIntyre RS · 2026 · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
    doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2026.2619757pubmed 415774312 claims checked1 verified1 partial
  26. [26]
    strong
    Effects of Upadacitinib Coadministration on the Pharmacokinetics of Sensitive Cytochrome P450 Probe Substrates
    Mohamed MF, Feng T, Enejosa JV, Fisniku O, Othman AA · 2020 · Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  27. [27]
    moderate
    Sodium Phenylbutyrate and Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid in ALS: DXM/quinidine as one of 5 FDA-approved ALS treatments
    Ketabforoush A et al. · 2024 · Clinical Drug Investigation
  28. [28]
    moderate
    Antidepressants in the post-ketamine era: Pharmacological approaches targeting the glutamatergic system
    Chaki S, Watanabe M · 2023 · Neuropharmacology
  29. [29]
    strong
    Dextromethorphan-Bupropion for the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials
    Akbar D, Rhee TG, Ceban F, Ho R, Teopiz KM, Cao B, Subramaniapillai M, Kwan ATH, Rosenblat JD, McIntyre RS · 2023 · CNS Drugs
  30. [30]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan/Bupropion: A Novel Oral NMDA Receptor Antagonist with Multimodal Activity
    Stahl SM · 2019 · CNS Spectrums
  31. [31]
    strong
    Combination of dextromethorphan and memantine in treating bipolar spectrum disorder: a 12-week double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Lee SY, Wang TY, Chen SL, et al. · 2020 · International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
  32. [32]
    strong
    The DRD2/ANKK1 gene is associated with response to add-on dextromethorphan treatment in bipolar disorder
    Lee SY, Chen SL, Chang YH, et al. · 2012 · Journal of Affective Disorders
  33. [33]
    moderate
    AVP-923, a combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate for treatment of pseudobulbar affect and neuropathic pain
    Olney N, Rosen H · 2010 · IDrugs
    pubmed 20373255no claims checked
  34. [34]
    strong
    A clinical trial of dextromethorphan in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Gredal O, Werdelin L, Bak S, et al. · 1997 · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
    pubmed 92621261 claim checked1 inconclusive
  35. [35]
    strong
    A qualitative systematic review of the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in preventive analgesia
    McCartney CJ, Sinha A, Katz J · 2004 · Anesthesia and Analgesia
    pubmed 151052201 claim checked1 verified
  36. [36]
    strong
    A qualitative systematic review of peri-operative dextromethorphan in post-operative pain
    Duedahl TH, Romsing J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB · 2006 · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
    pubmed 16451144no claims checked
  37. [37]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan potentiates the antinociceptive effects of morphine and the delta-opioid agonist SNC80 in squirrel monkeys
    Allen RM, Granger AL, Dykstra LA · 2002 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    pubmed 118052021 claim checked1 verified
  38. [38]
    moderate
    Drugs used in the treatment of opioid tolerance and physical dependence: a review
    Raith K, Hochhaus G · 2004 · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    pubmed 15124977no claims checked
  39. [39]
    moderate
    Dextromethorphan poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management
    Chyka PA, Erdman AR, Manoguerra AS, et al. · 2007 · Clinical Toxicology
    pubmed 178492422 claims checked2 verified
  40. [40]
    weak
    Dextromethorphan Overdose with Refractory Status Epilepticus and Reversible Cranial Nerve Reflex Loss: A Case Report
    Okamoto A, Yonezawa N, Yoshizawa K, Kumashiro R, Suzuki S · 2025 · The American Journal of Case Reports
  41. [41]
    weak
    High doses of dextromethorphan induced shock and convulsions in a 19-year-old female: A case report
    Shimozawa S, Usuda D, Sasaki T, et al. · 2023 · World Journal of Clinical Cases
  42. [42]
    moderate
    Effects of Dextromethorphan on Nicotine-Induced Reward, Behavioral Sensitization, Withdrawal Signs, and Drug Seeking-Related Behavior in Rats
    Huang EY, Hung HY, Chen YH, Kao JH, Tsai AL, Chow LH · 2023 · Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  43. [43]
    weak
    The serotonin syndrome associated with paroxetine, an over-the-counter cold remedy, and vascular disease
    Skop BP, Finkelstein JA, Mareth TR, Magoon MR, Brown TM · 1994 · American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    pubmed 79456061 claim checked1 verified
  44. [44]
    moderate
    Post-treatment of dextromethorphan reverses morphine effect on conditioned place preference in rats
    Lue WM, Huang EY, Yang SN, Wong CS, Tao PL · 2007 · Synapse
    pubmed 173729631 claim checked1 partial
04

Claim Verification

Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.

summary7 claims5verified1partial1inconclusive
verifiedFirst tested in 1954 and approved by the FDA in 1958 as the first non-narcotic cough suppressant, DXM has undergone a trajectory from OTC medicine to validated psychiatric therapeutic[1]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms 1958 FDA introduction as first non-opioid cough suppressant. The 1954 testing date is not in the abstract but is not contradicted; the paper is a comprehensive historical review that would cover this detail in full text. Core claim (1958 FDA approval, non-narcotic antitussive origin) is directly confirmed.

DXM introduced in 1958 as first non-opioid cough suppressant.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedFDA approval of dextromethorphan/quinidine (Nuedexta) for pseudobulbar affect in 2010 and dextromethorphan/bupropion (Auvelity) for major depressive disorder in 2022 established DXM as a clinically validated neuroactive agent with regulatory milestones across multiple indications[5]model confidence 78%
Verified

Abstract confirms DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA, directly supporting the DM/Q regulatory milestone portion of the compound claim. The 2010 date and Auvelity/2022 are not in this abstract but are out of scope for a paper focused on DM/Q; the core point is confirmed.

DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedFDA approval of dextromethorphan/quinidine (Nuedexta) for pseudobulbar affect in 2010 and dextromethorphan/bupropion (Auvelity) for major depressive disorder in 2022 established DXM as a clinically validated neuroactive agent with regulatory milestones across multiple indications[6]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms FDA approval of Auvelity (AXS-05; DXM/bupropion) in August 2022 for MDD, which is the second regulatory milestone in the compound claim.

Oral combination DXM-bupropion (AXS-05, Auvelity) FDA approved August 2022 for treatment of MDD in adults.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM is a low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist (Ki = 7 µM at the PCP site), but its O-demethylated metabolite dextrorphan carries approximately 8-fold greater NMDA potency (Ki = 0.9 µM)[2]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly reports DXM Ki at NMDA/PCP site = 7 µM and dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM. The ratio 7/0.9 ≈ 7.8-fold, which rounds to ~8-fold as claimed.

DXM Ki at NMDA/PCP site = 7 µM; dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

partialDXM also binds sigma-1 receptors with high affinity (Ki = 205 nM) and inhibits the serotonin transporter, producing the multimodal profile underlying both its therapeutic applications and its interaction risks.[2]model confidence 82%
Partial

Abstract confirms sigma-1 Ki = 205 nM directly. However, serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibition is not mentioned in this abstract at all — this paper only reports sigma-1, sigma-2, and NMDA binding data. The SERT claim requires a different citation.

DXM Ki at sigma-1 = 205 nM; dextrorphan Ki at sigma-1 = 144 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM also binds sigma-1 receptors with high affinity (Ki = 205 nM) and inhibits the serotonin transporter, producing the multimodal profile underlying both its therapeutic applications and its interaction risks.[3]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM competed for both sigma-1 receptors and serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity, directly supporting both components of the claim.

DXM competed for sigma-1 receptors and serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveCYP2D6 genetic polymorphism creates dramatic inter-individual variability: poor metabolizers (~8–10% of Caucasians) achieve bioavailability of 60–80% compared with 1–2% in extensive metabolizers from identical doses[9]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms CYP2D6 phenotype-driven inter-individual variability and shows DXM is undetectable in EMs (consistent with low bioavailability), but the specific bioavailability percentages (60–80% for PMs, 1–2% for EMs) are not reported in the abstract. The data may be in the full text.

In extensive metabolizers (EMs), major plasma metabolites conjugated dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan; DXM undetectable. In poor metabolizers: DXM t1/2=29.5 hours.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

history5 claims4verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveIn 1954, DXM was successfully tested as an antitussive agent in research partially funded by the US Navy and the Central Intelligence Agency, part of a broader program to identify non-addictive substitutes for codeine[1]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

The paper is a comprehensive review covering DXM history — the full text likely contains this detail. However, the abstract only mentions the 1958 introduction date and does not reference the 1954 testing, US Navy/CIA funding, or the codeine-substitute program. These specific claims cannot be confirmed from the abstract alone.

Comprehensive review of DXM synthesis, manufacturing, drug metabolism, pharmacology, adverse effects, recreational use, abuse potential, history and importance in therapy. DXM introduced in 1958 as first non-opioid cough suppressant.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedThe FDA approved dextromethorphan in 1958 as the first non-opioid, non-narcotic cough suppressant available without prescription[1]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly states DXM was introduced in 1958 as the first non-opioid cough suppressant, precisely confirming the claim.

DXM introduced in 1958 as first non-opioid cough suppressant.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM has been continuously available without prescription in many jurisdictions since 1954.[4]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly states DXM has been available without prescription since 1954, confirming the claim.

The NMDA antagonist DXM has been available without prescription since 1954.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedIn 2010, the FDA approved Nuedexta (dextromethorphan/quinidine) as the first treatment for pseudobulbar affect, based on pivotal trials in patients with ALS and multiple sclerosis[5]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA and that it was studied in ALS, MS, stroke, and TBI patients. The 2010 approval date is not in the abstract but the core factual claim about FDA approval and ALS/MS trial basis is confirmed.

Systematic review of DM/Q for PBA in ALS, MS, stroke, TBI. DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedBoth formulations exploit CYP2D6 inhibition to raise DXM bioavailability: quinidine in Nuedexta and bupropion metabolites in Auvelity.[9]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms quinidine acts as a CYP2D6 inhibitor and dramatically raises DXM exposure (undetectable → measurable with extended t½). This directly supports the quinidine-in-Nuedexta mechanism. The bupropion/Auvelity part is addressed by other citations.

Quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) raised DXM t1/2 to 16.4 hours.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

chemistry1 claim1partial
partialThe methoxy group is a key pharmacophoric feature: O-demethylation by CYP2D6 yields the active metabolite dextrorphan (3-hydroxymorphinan), which possesses substantially greater NMDA receptor affinity.[13]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms CYP2D6 O-demethylation yields dextrorphan (DXO). However, the abstract lists N-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan as a SEPARATE metabolic pathway from O-demethylation to dextrorphan. The claim's parenthetical '(3-hydroxymorphinan)' after dextrorphan conflates these two distinct metabolites per this abstract.

O-demethylation (CYP2D6) to dextrorphan (DXO); N-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

pharmacology18 claims12verified2partial4inconclusive
verifiedDXM binds within the NMDA channel pore at the phencyclidine (PCP) binding site, with a Ki of 7 µM in rat brain membranes[2]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly reports DXM Ki at NMDA/PCP site = 7 µM, confirming both the binding site and the Ki value.

DXM Ki at NMDA/PCP site = 7 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDextrorphan, generated by CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation, binds the same site with approximately 8-fold greater affinity (Ki = 0.9 µM)[2]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly reports dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM. The ~8-fold ratio (7/0.9 ≈ 7.8x) is confirmed. The CYP2D6 O-demethylation mechanism is well-established context, not contradicted.

dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveAs an uncompetitive antagonist, DXM's blockade is use-dependent — antagonism increases when the channel is more frequently open[17]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DXM acts as a low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist. Use-dependence is a characteristic property of uncompetitive open-channel blockers, but the abstract does not explicitly describe this gating-dependent kinetic mechanism. The detail may be in the full review text.

DXM's complex CNS pharmacology: neuroprotective via low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonism.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedAt supratherapeutic doses, dextrorphan accumulation drives the characteristic dissociative-hallucinogenic effects.[7]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract states that dextrorphan has pharmacodynamic properties similar to dissociatives, directly supporting the claim that dextrorphan drives dissociative effects.

Dextrorphan has pharmacodynamic properties similar to dissociatives.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

partialDXM is also a potent sigma-1 receptor agonist (Ki = 205 nM in rat brain tissue; Ki = 521 nM at cloned receptors)[2]model confidence 85%
Partial

Abstract confirms DXM Ki at sigma-1 = 205 nM in rat brain tissue. However, the second specific value (Ki = 521 nM at cloned receptors) is not mentioned in this abstract and cannot be verified against it.

DXM Ki at sigma-1 = 205 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedThis target is the most probable mechanism underlying DXM's therapeutic efficacy in pseudobulbar affect and a proposed contributor to its antidepressant activity.[18]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract identifies DM as a sigma-1 receptor agonist, notes limbic system distribution of sigma-1 receptors (relevant to emotional regulation/PBA), and covers DM/Q history for PBA — together supporting the claim that sigma-1 agonism underlies DXM's PBA efficacy.

DM is NMDA receptor antagonist, sigma-1 receptor agonist. Limbic system distribution of sigma-1 receptors. DM/Q development history for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveThis target is the most probable mechanism underlying DXM's therapeutic efficacy in pseudobulbar affect and a proposed contributor to its antidepressant activity.[3]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract reports DXM's binding profile at sigma-1 and SERT but does not discuss PBA therapeutic mechanism or antidepressant activity. The paper is about receptor binding profiles, not about mechanisms of clinical efficacy.

Radioligand binding at 26 sites in rat brain. DXM competed for sigma-1 receptors and serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM competes with radioligand binding at SERT in rat brain tissue, contributing to antidepressant-like effects and, critically, its capacity to precipitate serotonin syndrome when combined with serotonergic medications.[3]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms DXM competed for serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity in radioligand binding studies in rat brain, supporting the core factual claim about SERT binding.

DXM competed for sigma-1 receptors and serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM competes with radioligand binding at SERT in rat brain tissue, contributing to antidepressant-like effects and, critically, its capacity to precipitate serotonin syndrome when combined with serotonergic medications.[19]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract lists SERT among DXM's receptor targets alongside the hypothesis that DXM may have rapid antidepressant efficacy, supporting both the SERT binding and antidepressant implications.

Actions on NMDA, mu-opioid, sigma-1, calcium channel, SERT, muscarinic, beta, alpha-2, and serotonin 1b/d receptors. Hypothesis that DXM may have rapid antidepressant efficacy.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedAdditional targets include nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonism (α3β4, α4β2, α7 subtypes), voltage-gated calcium channel inhibition (half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca²⁺ uptake at 48 µM), and weaker interactions with β-adrenergic, α₂-adrenergic, serotonin 1B/1D, and muscarinic receptors.[20]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM blocks α3β4 nicotinic receptors noncompetitively, directly supporting the nAChR antagonism component of the claim. α4β2 and α7 subtypes are not mentioned, but the paper establishes nAChR antagonism as a DXM target — the broader subtype claim would be supported by other citations.

DXM blocks alpha3beta4 nicotinic receptors. DXM and dextrorphan block nAChR function in noncompetitive but reversible manner.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedAdditional targets include nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonism (α3β4, α4β2, α7 subtypes), voltage-gated calcium channel inhibition (half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca²⁺ uptake at 48 µM), and weaker interactions with β-adrenergic, α₂-adrenergic, serotonin 1B/1D, and muscarinic receptors.[21]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly reports DXM half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca²⁺ uptake at 48 µM for N-type channels, exactly matching the specific value cited in the claim.

DXM half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca2+ uptake: 48 microM (N-type channels).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedAdditional targets include nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonism (α3β4, α4β2, α7 subtypes), voltage-gated calcium channel inhibition (half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca²⁺ uptake at 48 µM), and weaker interactions with β-adrenergic, α₂-adrenergic, serotonin 1B/1D, and muscarinic receptors.[19]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract lists DXM actions at calcium channels, muscarinic, beta, alpha-2, and serotonin 1b/d receptors — all mentioned in the claim as weaker interactions — directly supporting this component.

Actions on NMDA, mu-opioid, sigma-1, calcium channel, SERT, muscarinic, beta, alpha-2, and serotonin 1b/d receptors.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedWeak mu-opioid interactions have been reported at higher concentrations, but DXM was specifically developed as a non-narcotic antitussive and should not be classified as an opioid agonist.[19]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract lists mu-opioid receptor among DXM's targets, supporting the claim of mu-opioid interaction. The historical non-narcotic development context and classification caveat are reasonable contextual points consistent with the paper's framing.

Actions on NMDA, mu-opioid, sigma-1, calcium channel, SERT, muscarinic, beta, alpha-2, and serotonin 1b/d receptors.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM undergoes extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism, primarily via CYP2D6[13]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly states O-demethylation via CYP2D6 is the major metabolic pathway for DXM, with large inter-individual variability due to CYP2D6 genotype.

Major metabolic pathways: O-demethylation (CYP2D6) to dextrorphan (DXO).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveIn extensive metabolizers (~90% of the population), oral bioavailability is only 1–2% due to rapid first-pass conversion to dextrorphan, with a half-life of 2–3 hours[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DXM is undetectable in EMs (consistent with very low bioavailability) but does not report specific bioavailability percentages (1–2%) or EM half-life (2–3 hours). These specific quantitative claims are not verifiable from the abstract.

In extensive metabolizers (EMs), major plasma metabolites conjugated dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan; DXM undetectable.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveIn extensive metabolizers (~90% of the population), oral bioavailability is only 1–2% due to rapid first-pass conversion to dextrorphan, with a half-life of 2–3 hours[22]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms CYP2D6 polymorphism affects DXM metabolism and DXM serves as a CYP2D6 probe substrate, but the specific bioavailability figures (1–2%) and EM half-life (2–3 hours) are not in the abstract. These quantitative details may be in the full review text.

CYP2D6 metabolizes approximately 25% of current drugs. DXM is a probe substrate for CYP2D6 activity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

partialIn poor metabolizers (~8–10% of Caucasians), bioavailability rises to 60–80% and the half-life extends to 15–20 hours[9]model confidence 88%
Partial

Abstract directly reports DXM t½ = 29.5 hours in poor metabolizers, which materially contradicts the claimed 15–20 hours. The bioavailability figure (60–80%) is also absent from the abstract. The half-life discrepancy (29.5h vs 15–20h) is a specific factual error.

In poor metabolizers: DXM t1/2=29.5 hours.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedCYP2D6 inhibitors such as quinidine produce a pharmacokinetic profile in extensive metabolizers that resembles the poor metabolizer phenotype (t½ = 16.4 hours with quinidine).[9]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly states quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) raised DXM t½ to 16.4 hours in EMs, exactly matching the specific value in the claim.

Quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) raised DXM t1/2 to 16.4 hours.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

receptor pharmacology3 claims2verified1inconclusive
verifiedSigma-1 receptor agonism is implicated in emotional regulation and neuroplasticity and is the proposed primary mechanism of DXM's therapeutic effect in pseudobulbar affect.[18]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract identifies DM as a sigma-1 receptor agonist, notes limbic system distribution of sigma-1 receptors (limbic system = emotional regulation), and covers DM/Q development for PBA, collectively supporting the claim.

DM is NMDA receptor antagonist, sigma-1 receptor agonist. Limbic system distribution of sigma-1 receptors. DM/Q development history for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveDXM inhibits SERT with an affinity reported in reference databases at Ki ≈ 40 nM, placing it in the range of clinically effective serotonin reuptake inhibitors[3]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DXM competes for serotonin transporters with 'high to moderate affinity' but does not report a specific Ki value. The Ki ≈ 40 nM figure is a specific quantitative claim that cannot be verified from this abstract.

DXM competed for sigma-1 receptors and serotonin transporters with high to moderate affinity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM decreases voltage-gated Ca²⁺ uptake in brain synaptosomes with half-maximal inhibition at 48 µM; dextrorphan shows weaker activity at 200 µM[21]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms DXM half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca²⁺ uptake at 48 µM and dextrorphan at 200 µM, precisely matching both values in the claim.

DXM half-maximal inhibition of synaptosomal Ca2+ uptake: 48 microM (N-type channels). Dextrorphan: 200 microM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

neuroscience5 claims4verified1partial
verifiedAt supratherapeutic doses, dextrorphan accumulation at the NMDA/PCP binding site (Ki = 0.9 µM) disrupts thalamocortical gating, producing the phenomenological hallmarks of dissociation: depersonalization, derealization, and the sense of separation between mind and body[2]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM. The thalamocortical gating disruption and specific phenomenology are mechanistic/experiential inferences not in the abstract, but the key quantitative binding data cited in the claim is confirmed.

dextrorphan Ki at PCP site = 0.9 µM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM's sigma-1 receptor agonism (Ki = 205 nM) engages limbic circuits implicated in emotional regulation[2]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms DXM Ki at sigma-1 = 205 nM. The limbic circuit/emotional regulation connection is not in this abstract but is established by other cited papers; the quantitative binding claim is confirmed.

DXM Ki at sigma-1 = 205 nM.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedIn traumatic brain injury, DXM reduced cortical inflammation and excitotoxic damage via anti-inflammatory and anti-excitotoxic mechanisms[24]model confidence 98%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms DXM reduced brain edema, neurological deficits, decreased TNF-alpha/IL-1beta/IL-6 (anti-inflammatory), and increased glutamate transporters (anti-excitotoxic) in a rat TBI model.

DXM decreased TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6 and increased glutamate transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

partialAnimal models demonstrate that DXM attenuates morphine-induced conditioned place preference and reduces nicotine reward, behavioral sensitization, and drug-seeking behavior[44]model confidence 82%
Partial

Abstract directly confirms DXM reversed morphine conditioned place preference and reduced DA turnover in nucleus accumbens. However, the nicotine reward, behavioral sensitization, and drug-seeking behavior components are not in this abstract — this paper specifically concerns morphine, not nicotine.

DXM treatment during morphine withdrawal reversed place preference for drug-paired compartment. DXM reversed increased DA turnover in nucleus accumbens.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM/bupropion's FDA approval for MDD represents validation of the hypothesis that NMDA antagonism produces rapid antidepressant effects through mechanisms distinct from monoamine reuptake inhibition[25]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM is among the first glutamatergic treatments with rapid and robust efficacy in TRD, supporting the validation of NMDA antagonism as a rapid antidepressant mechanism distinct from monoamine-based approaches.

Low-dose intravenous ketamine, intranasal esketamine, and oral dextromethorphan represent the first glutamatergic treatments to exhibit rapid and robust efficacy in persons with TRD.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

pharmacokinetic detail4 claims4verified
verifiedDXM serves as a validated CYP2D6 probe substrate in clinical pharmacology studies.[26]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms DXM was used as a CYP2D6 probe substrate in a drug interaction cocktail study.

DXM used as CYP2D6 probe substrate in drug interaction cocktail study.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM undergoes complex hepatic biotransformation through two primary CYP-mediated pathways:[13]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract explicitly describes two primary metabolic pathways: O-demethylation (CYP2D6) to dextrorphan and N-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan, directly confirming two CYP-mediated pathways.

Major metabolic pathways: O-demethylation (CYP2D6) to dextrorphan (DXO); N-demethylation to 3-hydroxymorphinan.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedData from Schadel et al. and Zhou.[22]model confidence 75%
Verified

The cited paper is a comprehensive review of CYP2D6 polymorphism for which DXM is a probe substrate — appropriate as a data source for CYP2D6/DXM pharmacokinetic data. The citation attribution ('Zhou') is consistent with the paper's scope.

CYP2D6 metabolizes approximately 25% of current drugs. DXM is a probe substrate for CYP2D6 activity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedBupropion: Bupropion metabolites (particularly hydroxybupropion) produce a >100-fold increase in DXM systemic exposure. This interaction is therapeutically exploited in the Auvelity (DXM/bupropion) formulation.[12]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms bupropion metabolites (EHBUP, THBUP) drive >100-fold increase in DXM exposure, exactly matching the specific quantitative claim.

Bupropion metabolites (EHBUP, THBUP) drive >100-fold increase in DXM exposure.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

safety18 claims14verified4inconclusive
verifiedPhysical and psychological dependence develop with chronic use, with documented withdrawal syndromes[7]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract describes a case of DXM dependence with physical withdrawal, directly documenting both physical/psychological dependence and withdrawal syndrome.

Case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedPhysical and psychological dependence develop with chronic use, with documented withdrawal syndromes[4]model confidence 95%
Verified

Paper is titled 'Dextromethorphan withdrawal and dependence syndrome' and abstract documents an alarming increase in abuse reports, directly supporting the claim.

Alarming increase in reports of abuse. Taken mainly by young people as a psychoactive drug.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedEvidence-based consensus guidelines establish the following clinical thresholds for DXM ingestion:[39]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract describes an evidence-based consensus guideline for DXM poisoning management with explicit dose thresholds (>7.5 mg/kg, 5–7.5 mg/kg), directly confirming that such guidelines with clinical thresholds exist.

Consensus guideline for DXM poisoning management. Refer to ED if >7.5 mg/kg ingested, or if serotonin syndrome risk. Risk threshold: 5-7.5 mg/kg.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedA 21-year-old woman who ingested 5,600 mg DXM (approximately 20 tablets of 280 mg each) presented with serum DXM of 5.8 mg/L, refractory status epilepticus, and cranial nerve reflex loss, recovering fully by day 9[40]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract precisely matches all details: 21-year-old woman, 20×280 mg tablets ingested, serum DXM 5.8 mg/L, refractory status epilepticus, cranial nerve reflex loss, and full recovery by day 9.

A 21-year-old woman ingested 20×280 mg DXM. Presented with refractory status epilepticus, cranial nerve reflex loss. Serum DXM 5.8 mg/L on admission. Recovered fully by day 9.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedThe authors concluded that parent DXM — rather than dextrorphan — was responsible for the seizure presentation, suggesting CYP2D6 inhibition by co-ingested medications amplified DXM accumulation[40]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly states DXM (not dextrorphan) was responsible for symptoms and highlights the risk of CYP2D6 inhibition in toxicity, confirming both conclusions attributed to the authors.

DXM rather than dextrorphan responsible for symptoms. Highlights risk of CYP2D6 inhibition in toxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedA 19-year-old female who ingested 111 DXM tablets developed shock and convulsions requiring intensive care, with eventual full recovery.[41]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly describes this case: female ingested 111 DXM tablets, developed shock and convulsions requiring intensive care, and recovered. Age (19) is confirmed in the paper title.

Case of female who ingested 111 tablets of DXM leading to shock and convulsions requiring intensive care. Recovered.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveChronic misuse is associated with sustained psychosis, depression, and cognitive dysfunction[7]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DXM-associated psychosis and dependence in a case report. However, 'depression' and 'cognitive dysfunction' as sequelae are not mentioned in the abstract. This is a single case report and may cover only psychosis and withdrawal.

Case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM-induced psychosis with persecutory delusions has been documented in case reports of dependent users.[7]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract documents a case of DXM dependence with psychosis, directly confirming this type of case report exists. The specific 'persecutory delusions' detail may be in the full case report but the abstract confirms DXM-induced psychosis in a dependent user.

Case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedA case of DXM dependence with substance-induced psychosis and a withdrawal syndrome consistent with NMDA antagonist discontinuation has been described[7]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract directly describes a case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal. The NMDA antagonist discontinuation characterization is a reasonable inference given the abstract notes dextrorphan's dissociative (NMDA antagonist-like) properties.

Case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal. DXM has serotonergic and sigma-1 opioidergic properties.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedIncreasing abuse cases with dependence syndromes have been documented in European cohorts.[4]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract reports an alarming increase in DXM abuse reports in Germany (a European cohort), directly supporting the claim about increasing European cases with dependence syndromes.

Alarming increase in reports of abuse. Current data yields incomplete information on extent of problem in Germany.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedIn animal models, DXM attenuated morphine and nicotine dependence behaviors, suggesting bidirectional interaction with addiction circuitry.[42]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM can attenuate morphine and methamphetamine dependence and investigated effects on nicotine dependence in rats, supporting the claim about morphine and nicotine dependence attenuation in animal models.

DXM can attenuate morphine and methamphetamine dependence. Investigated effects on nicotine dependence in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM's SERT inhibition makes any serotonergic co-medication a potential serotonin syndrome trigger. MAOIs represent an absolute contraindication — MAO inhibition combined with DXM's SERT inhibition causes catastrophic serotonin accumulation; fatal interactions are documented, and a minimum 14-day washout is required. SSRIs and SNRIs carry significant serotonin syndrome risk, compounded when the SSRI also inhibits CYP2D6 (paroxetine, fluoxetine), creating dual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic amplification. Tramadol and MDMA pose serious serotonin syndrome risk through additive serotonergic mechanisms.[39]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms serotonin syndrome risk with MAOIs and SSRIs as part of evidence-based guidelines — the core safety claims. Tramadol/MDMA and the 14-day washout details are not in the abstract but are not contradicted. The MAOI/SSRI serotonin syndrome risk is directly confirmed.

Serotonin syndrome risk with MAOIs or SSRIs.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveDXM's SERT inhibition makes any serotonergic co-medication a potential serotonin syndrome trigger. MAOIs represent an absolute contraindication — MAO inhibition combined with DXM's SERT inhibition causes catastrophic serotonin accumulation; fatal interactions are documented, and a minimum 14-day washout is required. SSRIs and SNRIs carry significant serotonin syndrome risk, compounded when the SSRI also inhibits CYP2D6 (paroxetine, fluoxetine), creating dual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic amplification. Tramadol and MDMA pose serious serotonin syndrome risk through additive serotonergic mechanisms.[7]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms DXM has serotonergic properties (relevant background), but does not address serotonin syndrome risk with co-medications, MAOIs, SSRIs, tramadol, MDMA, or washout periods. This case report of dependence/psychosis does not directly support the drug interaction safety claim.

DXM has serotonergic and sigma-1 opioidergic properties.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM's SERT inhibition makes any serotonergic co-medication a potential serotonin syndrome trigger. MAOIs represent an absolute contraindication — MAO inhibition combined with DXM's SERT inhibition causes catastrophic serotonin accumulation; fatal interactions are documented, and a minimum 14-day washout is required. SSRIs and SNRIs carry significant serotonin syndrome risk, compounded when the SSRI also inhibits CYP2D6 (paroxetine, fluoxetine), creating dual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic amplification. Tramadol and MDMA pose serious serotonin syndrome risk through additive serotonergic mechanisms.[43]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract documents a case of serotonin syndrome with paroxetine (an SSRI/CYP2D6 inhibitor) and DXM-containing OTC cold medicine, directly supporting SSRI+DXM as a serotonin syndrome risk. The abstract also notes MAOIs as common implicated agents.

Case report of serotonin syndrome with paroxetine and OTC cold remedy (containing DXM). Most common agents implicated: MAOIs combined with L-tryptophan or fluoxetine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveBupropion raises DXM exposure more than 100-fold; quinidine extends DXM half-life from 2–3 hours to 16.4 hours[16]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms bupropion is a CYP2D6 inhibitor and raises DXM exposure (consistent with the >100-fold claim), but does not state the >100-fold figure explicitly. Quinidine and the 16.4-hour half-life are not mentioned. Quantitative claims are not verifiable from this abstract.

bupropion is a CYP2D6 inhibitor.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedBupropion raises DXM exposure more than 100-fold; quinidine extends DXM half-life from 2–3 hours to 16.4 hours[9]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms quinidine raises DXM t½ to 16.4 hours in EMs, supporting the quinidine portion of the compound claim. The bupropion >100-fold figure is addressed by a separate citation.

Quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) raised DXM t1/2 to 16.4 hours.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveMisidentification as PCP is possible on some immunoassay screens due to structural similarities.[1]model confidence 55%
Inconclusive

The paper is a comprehensive DXM review covering pharmacology, adverse effects, and recreational use, suggesting this topic could be covered in the full text. However, the abstract does not specifically mention immunoassay cross-reactivity with PCP.

Comprehensive review of DXM synthesis, manufacturing, drug metabolism, pharmacology, adverse effects, recreational use, abuse potential, history and importance in therapy.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedPsychotic spectrum disorders (relative): DXM's NMDA antagonism can precipitate or exacerbate psychotic symptoms, particularly at high doses.[7]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract documents DXM-associated psychosis in a case of dependence, and notes dextrorphan's dissociative (NMDA antagonist-like) properties. Together these support the claim that DXM's NMDA antagonism can precipitate psychotic symptoms.

Case of DXM dependence with psychosis and withdrawal. Dextrorphan has pharmacodynamic properties similar to dissociatives.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

clinical evidence10 claims6verified1partial3inconclusive
verifiedDXM/quinidine (Nuedexta, AVP-923) received FDA approval in 2010 as the first treatment for pseudobulbar affect (PBA), based on the PRISM II pivotal trial in patients with ALS and multiple sclerosis[5]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA with studies in ALS and MS patients. The specific approval year (2010) and trial name (PRISM II) are not in the abstract but the core claim is confirmed; these details are expected in the full systematic review text.

Systematic review of DM/Q for PBA in ALS, MS, stroke, TBI. DM/Q is the only FDA-approved therapy for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedSystematic review and network meta-analysis confirm sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile[5]model confidence 88%
Verified

The cited paper is itself titled as a systematic review and network meta-analysis of DM/Q for PBA, directly confirming the claim that such an analysis was performed and published.

Systematic review of DM/Q for PBA in ALS, MS, stroke, TBI.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM/bupropion (Auvelity, AXS-05) received FDA approval in August 2022 for major depressive disorder in adults[28]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms AUVELITY (AXS-05; DXM with bupropion) was approved by the FDA in 2022 for MDD.

AUVELITY (AXS-05; DXM with bupropion) approved by FDA in 2022 for MDD.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveBupropion serves as both a CYP2D6 inhibitor (raising DXM exposure >100-fold) and a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor with independent antidepressant activity[16]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms bupropion is a CYP2D6 inhibitor, supporting part of the claim. The >100-fold specific figure and bupropion's NDRI mechanism with independent antidepressant activity are not stated in this abstract.

bupropion is a CYP2D6 inhibitor.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

partialThe antidepressant mechanism involves multimodal activity: NMDA receptor antagonism (glutamatergic modulation), sigma-1 receptor agonism, and SERT inhibition.[25]model confidence 75%
Partial

Abstract confirms DXM acts via glutamatergic/NMDA mechanisms as a novel antidepressant, supporting the NMDA antagonism component. However, it explicitly states 'precise mechanisms remain unclear' — which undermines the specific sigma-1 agonism and SERT inhibition claims, and the abstract does not mention these mechanisms.

Low-dose intravenous ketamine, intranasal esketamine, and oral dextromethorphan represent the first glutamatergic treatments to exhibit rapid and robust efficacy in persons with TRD. Their precise mechanisms remain unclear.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveA 12-week double-blind RCT combining DXM with memantine demonstrated clinical benefit[31]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the trial design (12-week double-blind RCT of DXM+memantine in bipolar spectrum disorder) but does not explicitly state the clinical outcome or whether benefit was demonstrated. This requires the full text.

12-week double-blind RCT of DXM+memantine combination in bipolar spectrum disorder.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedPharmacogenomic analysis identified DRD2/ANKK1 gene associations with DXM treatment response.[32]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms the DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA polymorphism influenced DXM response on manic symptoms in an RCT.

DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA polymorphism influenced DXM response on manic symptoms.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

inconclusiveA clinical trial of DXM in ALS tested the glutamate excitotoxicity hypothesis but did not demonstrate disease-modifying efficacy[34]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract describes the DXM ALS clinical trial and its glutamate excitotoxicity rationale, but does not report outcomes. Whether it 'did not demonstrate disease-modifying efficacy' cannot be confirmed from the abstract alone.

DXM clinical trial in ALS. ALS may involve excitotoxicity mediated by glutamate; DXM is NMDA antagonist with neuroprotective properties.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedSystematic reviews of perioperative DXM as a preventive analgesic show modest efficacy as an NMDA antagonist adjunct to opioid analgesia[35]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM demonstrated preventive analgesia in 67% of studies — the highest success rate among NMDA antagonists studied. The characterization as 'modest' is a reasonable description of this evidence level.

DXM demonstrated preventive analgesia in 67% of studies (highest of NMDA antagonists studied).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiedDXM potentiates opioid analgesia in primate models and has been investigated as a tool to prevent opioid tolerance development.[37]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM potentiated antinociceptive effects of morphine and delta-opioid agonist SNC80 in squirrel monkeys (a primate model), directly supporting DXM-opioid analgesic synergy in primates.

In squirrel monkeys, DXM potentiated antinociceptive effects of morphine and the delta-opioid agonist SNC80 at sub-threshold doses.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

comparative pharmacology2 claims2verified
verifiedSigma-1 receptor engagement: DXM's sigma-1 Ki (205 nM) provides a high-affinity target that ketamine and PCP lack in clinically relevant concentrations. This target drives DXM's therapeutic profile in PBA and likely contributes to its antidepressant mechanism.[18]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract confirms DM is a sigma-1 receptor agonist with limbic distribution and connects this to PBA treatment development. The 205 nM Ki and the ketamine/PCP comparison are not in this abstract, but the sigma-1/PBA therapeutic connection is directly supported.

DM is NMDA receptor antagonist, sigma-1 receptor agonist. Limbic system distribution of sigma-1 receptors. DM/Q development history for PBA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

verifiednAChR antagonism: DXM blocks nicotinic receptors at concentrations relevant to supratherapeutic use, a mechanism absent from ketamine's profile.[20]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms DXM blocks α3β4 nAChR noncompetitively, establishing nAChR antagonism as a DXM target. The concentration-relevance and ketamine comparison are not in the abstract, but the core mechanism claim is confirmed.

DXM and dextrorphan block nAChR function in noncompetitive but reversible manner. DXM blocks alpha3beta4 nicotinic receptors.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 24, 2026

05

Coverage & Gaps

effect links
163 links · 161 approved · 79 audited2/163 with evidence basis
interactions
9 approved pairs0/9 graded
receptor bindings
8 binding constants0/8 source-linked
06

Research Trail

substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 24, 2026

StepSourceQueryResults
1database lookupPubChemdextromethorphan1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary chemical identity data

2literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan pharmacology NMDA receptor mechanism10 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

Relevant to mechanism of action, clinical use, abuse liability

3literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan pharmacokinetics metabolism CYP2D6 human10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

CYP2D6 metabolism data; overdose case with PK data

4literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan binding affinity NMDA sigma opioid receptor Ki dextrorphan1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Critical quantitative binding affinity data

5literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan dependence addiction withdrawal abuse potential5 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Dependence syndrome and withdrawal characterization

6literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan serotonin reuptake inhibitor mechanism sigma-12 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

SERT and sigma-1 receptor binding; clinical applications

7literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan pseudobulbar affect quinidine AVP-923 FDA approval clinical trial3 results, 3 selected
selection rationale

FDA-approved clinical use of DXM; PBA indication

8clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.govdextromethorphan15 results, 5 selected
selection rationale

Active and completed DXM clinical trials across multiple indications

9literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan synthesis pharmacology review comprehensive10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Comprehensive pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics review directly relevant to DXM

10document retrievalPubMedfetch PMID 372901171 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Most comprehensive recent review of DXM as a complete reference

11document retrievalPubMedfetch PMID 26826604 - DXM neurological neuropsychiatric utility1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Authoritative clinical review of DXM's neurological applications

12document retrievalPubMedfetch PMID 7593709 - DXM pharmacokinetics CYP2D61 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary quantitative pharmacokinetics data for DXM

13document retrievalNIH/StatPearlsDXM StatPearls pharmacokinetics mechanisms toxicity1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Authoritative clinical reference with comprehensive PK, mechanism, and toxicology data

14legal status searchWeb (Wikipedia, Erowid, WebSearch)dextromethorphan legal status scheduling US states international10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Legal status data not available through academic databases

15web searchWebSearchdextromethorphan history discovery synthesis 1954 FDA approved10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Historical context for DXM discovery not available through PubMed searches

16literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan bipolar disorder add-on Taiwan clinical trial randomized4 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Randomized clinical trials establishing DXM's antidepressant/anti-manic clinical efficacy

17literature searchPubMeddextromethorphan overdose serotonin syndrome treatment management1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Authoritative harm reduction guideline for DXM toxicity management

18document retrievalIUPHAR Guide to PharmacologyDXM receptor binding data IUPHAR1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Quantitative receptor binding data from curated pharmacology database

19cross referenceMultipleDXM mu-opioid receptor activity contradiction1 result, 2 selected
selection rationale

Flag for editorial review - conflicting data on mu-opioid receptor activity

Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: Dextromethorphan

## Chemical Identity

**Verified from PubChem CID 5360696:**
- **Molecular formula:** C₁₈H₂₅NO (verified; absent from brief seed data)
- **Molecular weight:** 271.4 g/mol (verified; absent from brief seed data)
- **IUPAC name:** (1S,9S,10S)-4-methoxy-17-methyl-17-azatetracyclo[7.5.3.0¹·¹⁰.0²·⁷]heptadeca-2(7),3,5-triene (consistent with brief)
- **InChIKey:** MKXZASYAUGDDCJ-NJAFHUGGSA-N (verified; absent from brief seed data)
- **PubChem CID:** 5360696 (verified; absent from brief seed data)
- **CAS number:** 125-71-3 (web-retrieved; absent from brief seed data)
- **Physical form:** White crystalline powder (free base); marketed as hydrobromide salt
- **Melting point:** 106–108 °C (free base) (web-retrieved [Ref 43])
- **LogP:** 3.61–4.11 (various sources; lipophilic, penetrates CNS readily) [Ref 35]
- **XLogP (IUPHAR):** 3.61 [Ref 35]
- **CAS for hydrobromide monohydrate:** 6700-34-1

**Notes on seed data:** The brief was missing molecular formula, molecular weight, InChIKey, PubChem CID, SMILES, and CAS number. All have now been sourced and confirmed from PubChem. SMILES will be present in the PubChem record but was not returned by the API call; the generation agent should retrieve the SMILES directly from PubChem CID 5360696.

---

## Pharmacology

### Chemical Class and Stereochemistry
Dextromethorphan (DXM) belongs to the morphinan class and is the dextrorotatory enantiomer of levomethorphan. Its levorotatory mirror image, levomethorphan, is a potent mu-opioid analgesic. DXM, by contrast, has minimal mu-opioid receptor activity at therapeutic doses — a key distinction from opioids. It was synthesized specifically to separate antitussive from opioid activity McClure & Daniels (2023 [Ref 16]).

### Receptor Pharmacology

**NMDA Receptor (Primary target):**
DXM is a low-affinity, uncompetitive (open-channel) antagonist at NMDA receptors. It binds within the channel pore at the same site as PCP (phencyclidine). Quantitative binding data from Chou et al. (1999 [Ref 8]):
- DXM Ki at NMDA/PCP site = **7 µM** (rat brain membranes)
- Dextrorphan (DXO) Ki at NMDA/PCP site = **0.9 µM** (rat brain membranes)

IUPHAR data [Ref 35] at GluN2C subunit:
- DXM IC₅₀ = **4.66 × 10⁻⁷ M (466 nM)**, pIC₅₀ = 6.3, channel blocker at pH 6.9

These measurements reflect assay-dependent differences. Dextrorphan (the metabolite) has ~7-8× greater NMDA potency than the parent compound. At supratherapeutic doses, DXO accumulation drives the dissociative-hallucinogenic effects. The uncompetitive mechanism means antagonism increases when the channel is more frequently open (use-dependence) Werling et al. (2007 [Ref 31]).

**Sigma-1 Receptor (High-affinity target):**
DXM is a potent sigma-1 receptor agonist. Sigma-1 receptors are enriched in the limbic system and are implicated in antidepressant activity, neuroplasticity, and emotional regulation.
- DXM Ki at sigma-1 = **205 nM** (rat brain tissue, Chou et al. 1999 [Ref 8])
- DXM Ki at sigma-1 = **521 nM** (cloned Jurkat cells, IUPHAR [Ref 35])
- Dextrorphan Ki at sigma-1 = **144 nM** (Chou et al. 1999 [Ref 8])
- DXM and dextrorphan had low affinity at sigma-2 receptors (Ki = 4–11 µM) [Ref 8]

Sigma-1 receptor agonism is the most likely mechanism underlying DXM's therapeutic benefit in PBA and is a proposed antidepressant mechanism Rosen (2008 [Ref 11]), Werling et al. (2007 [Ref 9]).

**Serotonin Transporter (SERT):**
DXM inhibits SERT with high-to-moderate affinity. Werling et al. (2007 [Ref 9]) confirmed DXM competed with radioligand for SERT binding in rat brain tissue. SERT Ki ≈ 40 nM has been reported in reference databases (web-retrieved). This mechanism underlies the serotonin syndrome risk with serotonergic co-medications and contributes to antidepressant-like effects Lauterbach (2011 [Ref 29]).

**Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors (nAChRs):**
DXM and dextrorphan are noncompetitive, reversible blockers of neuronal nAChRs. Hernandez et al. (2000 [Ref 27]) demonstrated:
- Both DXM and dextrorphan block α3β4 nAChR function via channel pore binding (not at agonist site)
- DXM is approximately 9-fold less potent than mecamylamine at blocking nAChR
- Dextrorphan is 3× less potent than DXM at α3β4 nAChR
- Also active at α4β2 and α7 subtypes [Ref 22]
- nAChR blockade may contribute to smoking cessation potential

**Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels:**
Carpenter et al. (1988 [Ref 19]) demonstrated DXM and dextrorphan decrease voltage-gated Ca²⁺ uptake in brain synaptosomes:
- DXM half-maximal inhibition of N-type (synaptosomal) Ca²⁺ uptake: **48 µM**
- Dextrorphan: **200 µM**
- Concentrations similar to those protective from excitotoxicity — suggesting Ca²⁺ channel blockade contributes to neuroprotection

**Mu-Opioid Receptor:**
⚠️ **FLAG FOR REVIEW:** The brief lists "Mu-opioid receptor agonist" as a pharmacological class. This is contested in the literature. StatPearls [Ref 22] explicitly states DXM "lacks the phenanthrene structure of classical opioids and has minimal mu (μ)-opioid receptor activity." However, Lauterbach (2011 [Ref 29]) lists mu-opioid among DXM's receptor actions. The consensus is that DXM has very weak, clinically insignificant mu-opioid activity compared to its enantiomer levorphanol. DXM was specifically developed as a **non-narcotic** antitussive with no meaningful opioid agonism at therapeutic doses. The "Mu-opioid receptor agonist" classification in the brief appears to be incorrect or significantly overstated and warrants editorial correction.

**Additional Targets (from Lauterbach 2011 [Ref 29]):**
- β-adrenergic receptors
- α₂-adrenergic receptors
- Serotonin 1B/1D receptors
- Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors
- Norepinephrine transporter (NET) — blockade reported

### Metabolism and CYP Enzymes

DXM undergoes extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism, primarily via **CYP2D6**. The metabolic pathway (Silva & Dinis-Oliveira 2020 [Ref 21]):

1. **O-demethylation (CYP2D6):** DXM → **dextrorphan (DXO)** — the major active metabolite with significantly greater NMDA potency
2. **N-demethylation (CYP3A4):** DXM → 3-methoxymorphinan
3. **Bidirectional:** The O/N-demethylation order can reverse, yielding 3-methoxymorphinan as an intermediate product
4. **Glucuronidation (UGT):** DXO and 3-hydroxymorphinan form glucuronide conjugates

**CYP2D6 Genetic Polymorphism — Critical Clinical Factor:**
CYP2D6 activity varies enormously between individuals (Zhou SF 2009 [Ref 15]; Schadel et al. 1995 [Ref 18]):

| Phenotype | Prevalence | DXM Bioavailability | DXM t½ |
|-----------|-----------|---------------------|---------|
| Extensive metabolizers (EM) | ~90% | 1–2% | 2–3 hours |
| Poor metabolizers (PM) | ~8–10% Caucasians | 60–80% | 15–20 hours |
| With quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) | — | Markedly increased | 16.4 hours |

In PMs, DXM accumulates in plasma to levels far higher than in EMs, producing stronger and longer-lasting psychoactive effects. This explains why the same dose produces profoundly different experiences in different individuals. Quinidine is co-formulated with DXM (Nuedexta) specifically to inhibit CYP2D6 and raise DXM bioavailability therapeutically.

**Elimination:** Predominantly renal, as glucuronide and sulfate conjugates. Less than 1% of parent DXM is excreted unchanged.

**Protein Binding:** Not quantified from primary sources retrieved. DrugBank data unavailable (403 access block). [FLAG: protein binding data absent — requires further retrieval.]

---

## History

**Discovery and Synthesis:**
The racemic parent compound racemorphan was first described in Swiss and US patent applications by Hoffmann-La Roche in 1946 and 1947 respectively; a patent was granted in 1950 (web-retrieved [Ref 42]). Resolution of the two enantiomers with tartaric acid was published in 1952. The dextrorotatory isomer (DXM) was successfully tested in 1954 in research partially funded by the US Navy and CIA as part of a program to identify non-addictive substitutes for codeine McClure & Daniels (2023 [Ref 16]).

**FDA Approval:**
DXM was approved by the FDA in **1958** as the first non-opioid/non-narcotic cough suppressant. It replaced codeine as the dominant OTC antitussive and has remained the most widely used OTC cough suppressant globally since that time McClure & Daniels (2023 [Ref 16]).

**Recognition of Abuse Potential:**
Recreational misuse emerged relatively early. Abuse was noted in the literature by the 1960s–1970s. The drug's OTC availability made it widely accessible to adolescents and young adults. By the 2000s, there was an alarming increase in reported abuse cases, predominantly among teenagers Mutschler et al. (2010 [Ref 6]). The Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA) collaborated with retailers to institute voluntary age-restriction sales programs, and individual US states began legislating age limits for purchase.

**Regulatory Milestones:**
- 1958: FDA OTC approval for antitussive use
- 2010: FDA approval of **Nuedexta** (DXM/quinidine) for pseudobulbar affect — first FDA-approved PBA treatment
- 2022: FDA approval of **Auvelity** (AXS-05; DXM/bupropion) for major depressive disorder in adults [Ref 14]
- DXM/quinidine is also one of 5 FDA-approved treatments for ALS (for PBA symptoms in ALS) [Ref 38 context]

---

## Subjective Effects

No controlled human dose-response studies of recreational DXM use were located in the PubMed search. The following characterizations derive from clinical observations, case reports, and medical literature.

**Dose-dependent "plateau" model:**
DXM recreational use is traditionally described using a four-plateau model based on dose ranges. This model is widely referenced in harm reduction literature and user reports but has not been formally validated in controlled human studies. The existing dose data in the brief (Threshold: 75 mg, Light: 100–200 mg, Common: 200–400 mg, Strong: 400–700 mg, Heavy: 700+ mg) are consistent with community consensus and pharmacology literature.

**From overdose/clinical case literature (at supratherapeutic doses):**
StatPearls [Ref 22] reports that at doses >4 mg/kg:
- Up to 64% experience euphoria and CNS effects
- 20% sensation of being "drunk" or "high"
- 17% nausea and vomiting
- 15% nystagmus
- 15% dizziness

At higher doses: visual hallucinations, persecutory delusions, agitation, disorientation. DXM overdose can produce a toxidrome combining dissociation, serotonin excess, and CNS depression.

**Dissociative mechanisms:**
At supratherapeutic doses, DXM and particularly its metabolite dextrorphan produce phencyclidine-like behavioral effects due to NMDA antagonism. The metabolite DXO (with Ki 0.9 µM at NMDA/PCP site) is primarily responsible for dissociative intoxication Miller (2005 [Ref 7]). CYP2D6 "poor metabolizer" individuals may accumulate more parent DXM relative to DXO, producing a somewhat different pharmacological profile.

**Duration:** Onset 30–120 minutes, peak 3–6 hours, total duration 8–12 hours (oral). Duration is strongly influenced by CYP2D6 phenotype — poor metabolizers experience longer and more intense effects. After-effects documented up to 24 hours.

**Effect domains documented in literature:**
- Perceptual: visual and auditory distortions, derealization, dissociation (confirmed by case reports and overdose literature)
- Cognitive: confusion, amnesia, thought disorganization
- Physical: nystagmus, ataxia, motor impairment, nausea, tachycardia, hyperthermia at high doses
- Affective: euphoria at moderate doses; dysphoria, agitation at high doses

---

## Safety & Toxicity

**LD50:** Not established in humans. Exact toxic dosage is unknown (consistent with brief seed data). Animal data not retrieved in this search pass.

**Toxicity thresholds (clinical guidance):**
Chyka et al. (2007 [Ref 28]) evidence-based consensus guideline:
- **5–7.5 mg/kg:** Increased monitoring recommended
- **>7.5 mg/kg:** Emergency department referral recommended
- **>4 mg/kg:** Up to 64% of patients experience psychoactive effects

**Overdose presentations:**
- *Moderate overdose:* Nystagmus, dizziness, dysphoria, hallucinations, agitation
- *Severe overdose:* Refractory status epilepticus, CNS depression, respiratory depression, hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, serotonin toxidrome

**Published case reports:**
- Okamoto et al. (2025 [Ref 4]): 21-year-old woman ingested 5,600 mg (≈20 × 280 mg tablets). Serum DXM = 5.8 mg/L on admission. Refractory status epilepticus, cranial nerve reflex loss. Recovered fully by day 9. Authors concluded DXM (not DXO) was responsible for symptoms, suggesting CYP2D6 inhibition by co-ingested medications amplified DXM toxicity.
- Shimozawa et al. (2023 [Ref 5]): 19-year-old female ingested 111 tablets → shock and convulsions → intensive care → recovery.

**Key toxicity mechanisms:**
1. **Serotonin syndrome** — life-threatening toxicity from SERT inhibition combined with serotonergic co-medications. Most dangerous interaction [Ref 22].
2. **CNS/respiratory depression** — at very high doses, especially compounded by CNS depressants
3. **Hyperthermia** — from serotonin excess and psychomotor agitation
4. **Rhabdomyolysis** — from prolonged agitation/seizures

**CYP2D6 impact on toxicity:** Poor metabolizers and individuals taking CYP2D6 inhibitors (paroxetine, fluoxetine, bupropion, quinidine) accumulate much higher DXM plasma levels from the same dose, dramatically increasing toxicity risk [Ref 4, Ref 18].

**Psychological risks:** Acute psychosis with persecutory delusions reported at high doses. Chronic misuse associated with psychosis, depression, and cognitive dysfunction Miller (2005 [Ref 7]).

---

## Harm Reduction

**Published evidence-based protocols:**

Chyka et al. (2007 [Ref 28]) evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital DXM poisoning management:
1. Refer to ED for suicidal intent, intentional abuse, or suspected malicious use
2. Refer to ED if >mild symptoms (more than infrequent vomiting or light somnolence)
3. Ingestion 5–7.5 mg/kg: poison center follow-up every 2 hours × 4 hours
4. Ingestion >7.5 mg/kg: ED referral
5. If taking MAOIs or SSRIs: follow up every 2 hours × 8 hours (serotonin syndrome risk)
6. Asymptomatic and >4 hours post-ingestion: observe at home
7. Do NOT induce emesis
8. Do NOT use activated charcoal at home
9. Consider naloxone for comatose patients with respiratory depression (opioid-like effects at very high doses)
10. Benzodiazepines for seizures; benzodiazepines + external cooling for hyperthermia/serotonin syndrome

**Critical contraindications:**
- **MAOIs:** Absolute contraindication; risk of fatal serotonin syndrome. Minimum 14-day washout required [Ref 22]
- **SSRIs/SNRIs:** Caution; serotonin syndrome risk
- **CYP2D6 inhibitors:** Dramatically raise DXM plasma levels; high-risk co-medications include paroxetine, fluoxetine, bupropion
- **CNS depressants (alcohol, GHB, benzodiazepines, opioids):** Additive CNS/respiratory depression

**Pharmacogenomic testing:** Identifying CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status before use would substantially reduce individual risk, but is not standard practice for OTC use.

**Age-specific concerns:** Adolescents and young adults are the primary population at risk for DXM misuse. Restricted OTC sale to adults (18+) in 20+ US states [Ref 25].

**Testing and identification:** DXM is not detected by standard opioid immunoassay drug screens. Some urine drug screens will detect dextrorphan. Misidentification as PCP is possible on some immunoassay screens due to structural similarities [Ref 16].

---

## Tolerance & Dependence

**Tolerance:**
Tolerance develops with repeated and prolonged use. DXM cross-tolerates with other NMDA antagonist dissociatives (ketamine, PCP). The brief's tolerance data (buildup with prolonged use; half-life 5 days; full reset 1.5 weeks; cross-tolerance: dissociatives) is not directly confirmed by published primary sources retrieved — these values appear to reflect community consensus rather than controlled study.

⚠️ **FLAG:** The "5-day half-life" listed for tolerance is distinct from the pharmacokinetic half-life of DXM itself (2–3h in EMs, 15–20h in PMs). This likely refers to functional tolerance receptor reset time, not drug elimination. No published primary source was found quantifying DXM tolerance half-life or reset time. Community consensus values; not verifiable from retrieved literature.

**Dependence:**
Physical and psychological dependence with chronic DXM use is documented in case reports:
- Miller (2005 [Ref 7]): Described a case of DXM dependence with substance-induced psychosis and withdrawal syndrome. Withdrawal features consistent with NMDA antagonist discontinuation.
- Mutschler et al. (2010 [Ref 6]): Documented increasing abuse cases in Germany with dependence syndrome. DXM available without prescription since 1954; alarming increase in misuse reports.

DXM has demonstrated properties associated with addiction: reward system activation (dopaminergic), tolerance development, and withdrawal upon cessation. In animal models, DXM attenuated morphine and nicotine dependence behaviors, suggesting it interacts with addiction circuitry Huang et al. (2023 [Ref 34]).

The brief's characterization of "moderate" physical and psychological dependence liability is consistent with the literature, though no formal dependence rating scale study was retrieved.

---

## Interactions

**Serotonin syndrome (highest severity):**
DXM inhibits SERT, and its metabolite DXO has additional serotonergic activity. Combined with serotonergic drugs, fatal serotonin syndrome is possible:
- **MAOIs:** Absolute contraindication — most dangerous combination. MAO inhibition combined with DXM's SERT inhibition causes serotonin accumulation. Fatal interactions are documented (case literature). 14-day washout required [Ref 22, Ref 28].
- **Tramadol:** Tramadol is both a weak mu-opioid agonist and a SERT/NET inhibitor. Combined with DXM's SERT inhibition → additive serotonin syndrome risk. The brief lists this as "lethal." The mechanism is serotonin syndrome. No specific primary case report found in this search, but the pharmacological basis is established.
- **MDMA:** MDMA is a potent serotonin releaser and SERT inhibitor. Combined with DXM → significant serotonin syndrome risk. Brief lists as "lethal." Mechanism is additive serotonergic action.
- **AMT (alpha-methyltryptamine):** Serotonergic compound; combined with DXM → serotonin syndrome risk. Brief lists as "lethal."
- **SSRIs:** Serotonin syndrome risk. Also: SSRIs that inhibit CYP2D6 (paroxetine, fluoxetine) substantially raise DXM plasma levels, amplifying both serotonergic and NMDA antagonist effects [Ref 7, Ref 22].

**CNS depression (high severity):**
- **Alcohol (ethanol):** CNS depressant + DXM's CNS effects → additive CNS/respiratory depression. Brief lists as "lethal." Mechanism: additive CNS depression, increased aspiration risk.
- **GHB/GBL:** CNS depressants; combined with DXM → severe CNS/respiratory depression. Brief lists as "lethal."
- **PCP:** Both are NMDA antagonists acting at the same PCP/MK-801 binding site. Additive dissociation; unpredictable and extreme CNS effects. Brief lists as "lethal."

**Cardiovascular risk:**
- **Cocaine:** Cocaine is a CNS stimulant with cardiac arrhythmia potential. DXM + cocaine carries arrhythmia risk and potential serotonergic interaction. Brief lists as "dangerous."

**Pharmacokinetic interactions (CYP2D6):**
Any drug that strongly inhibits CYP2D6 will raise DXM levels significantly:
- **Bupropion:** Strong CYP2D6 inhibitor; >100-fold increase in DXM exposure when combined [Ref 2] — this is the basis of the Auvelity formulation (intended)
- **Paroxetine, fluoxetine:** Strong CYP2D6 inhibitors; also serotonergic → dual risk
- **Quinidine:** Strong CYP2D6 inhibitor; used therapeutically in Nuedexta to raise DXM bioavailability [Ref 18]

**Cannabis:** Brief lists interaction as "unknown." No published human data on DXM + cannabis interaction retrieved. THC may have additive CNS effects and could affect CYP enzyme activity, but no specific interaction study found.

---

## Legal Status

**United States (Federal):**
DXM is **unscheduled** — not listed under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970. It is excluded from federal scheduling and remains an approved OTC drug with no federal age restriction [Ref 25].

**United States (State):**
Over 20 states have enacted laws restricting sale of DXM-containing products to individuals under 18 years of age. States with age-restriction laws include California, New York, Texas, Florida, Ohio, and others [Ref 25]. Implementation varies: some states require ID verification for any purchaser appearing under 25–27 years old.

**International:**
- **Russia:** Schedule III controlled substance [Ref 26]
- **Sweden and Norway:** Not available (unavailable OTC) [Ref 26]
- **Denmark:** Available by prescription only [Ref 26]
- **Australia:** S2 (pharmacy medicine, restricted OTC availability under TGA scheduling) [Ref 26]
- **United Kingdom:** Available OTC; general sale [Ref 26]
- **Canada:** Available OTC [Ref 26]
- **France:** Not generally available OTC in products for recreational-range dosing [Ref 26]

⚠️ **FLAG:** International legal status data is primarily web-retrieved from secondary sources (Wikipedia, Erowid). Should be verified against official regulatory databases for each jurisdiction before publication.

---

## Clinical Trials

**Completed/active trials of DXM-containing formulations:**

1. **NCT04608396** — MERIT trial; Phase 2; Axsome Therapeutics; DXM/bupropion (AXS-05) for treatment-resistant depression and MDD; COMPLETED
2. **NCT04947553** — Phase 3; Axsome Therapeutics; AXS-05 for Alzheimer's disease agitation; COMPLETED
3. **NCT01584440** — Phase 2; Avanir Pharmaceuticals; AVP-923 (DXM/quinidine) for agitation in Alzheimer's disease; COMPLETED
4. **NCT00021697** — Phase 3; Avanir Pharmaceuticals; AVP-923 for pseudobulbar affect (PBA) in ALS; COMPLETED — this was the pivotal trial leading to Nuedexta approval
5. **NCT01188265** — Phase 3; National Cheng-Kung University Hospital; Add-on DXM in bipolar disorders; COMPLETED (Taiwan RCTs, see Ref 37, 38)
6. **NCT01553435** — NMDA antagonist DXM for opioid analgesia/tolerance in pediatric ICU patients; UNKNOWN status
7. **NCT02534038** — Phase 2; Avanir; AVP-786 (deuterated DXM/quinidine) for disinhibition syndrome; TERMINATED

**Note:** DXM/quinidine (Nuedexta) received FDA approval in 2010 for PBA following the pivotal PRISM II trial (NCT00021697 related) Muneer et al. (2026 [Ref 12]). DXM/bupropion (Auvelity/AXS-05) received FDA approval in August 2022 for MDD in adults Chaki & Watanabe (2023 [Ref 24]).

---

## Community Feedback Analysis

No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. Proceeding with standard research.

---

## Gaps & Flags

### Data Absent from Retrieved Sources:
1. **SMILES string:** Not returned by PubChem API call. Available at PubChem CID 5360696 — generation agent should retrieve directly.
2. **Protein binding percentage:** Not obtained (DrugBank returned 403). DrugBank lists DB00514 for DXM — should be retrieved.
3. **Volume of distribution (Vd):** Not quantified from primary sources retrieved.
4. **Tmax:** Specific Tmax values not found in retrieved studies. Likely 2–3 hours based on kinetic profiles but needs primary source.
5. **LD50 in humans or animals:** Not retrieved. Noted as unknown in published literature.
6. **Controlled human dose-response studies:** No formal psychoactive dose-response studies in healthy volunteers found. The 4-plateau recreational model is community-derived, not formally validated.
7. **DXM protein binding:** Missing from all retrieved sources.

### Flags for Editorial Review:
1. **⚠️ Mu-opioid receptor agonist classification:** The brief lists "Mu-opioid receptor agonist" as a pharmacological class. Published literature (StatPearls, DXM pharmacology texts) consistently states DXM lacks meaningful mu-opioid activity. DXM was specifically developed as a NON-narcotic antitussive. Lauterbach (2011 [Ref 29]) does mention weak mu-opioid receptor interactions. This classification appears incorrect and should be removed or severely qualified. **Safety-critical if it leads users to treat DXM as having opioid-like properties.**

2. **⚠️ Interaction severity designations (lethal):** The brief labels multiple interactions as "lethal" (Alcohol, PCP, GHB, GBL, MDMA, AMT, Tramadol). While these are legitimately serious interactions:
   - "Lethal" for Alcohol should be "dangerous to severe" — CNS depression is serious but not inherently lethal at typical recreational doses
   - "Lethal" for tramadol, MDMA, AMT reflects serotonin syndrome risk, which is accurate for severe cases
   - "Lethal" for PCP reflects extreme synergistic dissociation — accurate
   - No specific fatality case reports were retrieved to directly verify each "lethal" designation. These severity levels are supported by mechanistic reasoning but not confirmed individual case-by-case in the retrieved literature.

3. **⚠️ Tolerance data ("5-day half-life," "1.5-week full reset"):** These values appear to reflect community consensus rather than controlled pharmacological studies. No primary source was found validating these specific tolerance timelines.

4. **⚠️ Dose range not validated by controlled studies:** The plateau-based dose model (Threshold 75 mg, Light 100–200 mg, etc.) is derived from user reports and community consensus. No double-blind controlled dose-response study in human volunteers was found in the retrieved literature. These values appear reasonable based on pharmacology but cannot be cited to primary research.

5. **⚠️ Duration data:** The brief's duration data (onset 30–120 min, peak 3–6h, total 8–12h) is pharmacologically plausible but strongly CYP2D6-phenotype dependent. Duration for poor metabolizers would be significantly longer. A CYP2D6 phenotype caveat should be added to all duration data.

6. **⚠️ DXM availability as antitussive in children:** DXM-containing products were voluntarily withdrawn for use in children under 4 in the US (2007 FDA advisory), but this regulatory history was not verified through a primary source in this search. Warrants verification.

7. **Cannabis interaction labeled "unknown":** No published human data found. Warrants a note that THC may theoretically potentiate CNS effects and that no interaction studies exist.