Cyclazodone
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | medium |
| Low | 5–15 mg | 5–15 mg | medium |
| Common | 15–25 mg | 15–25 mg | medium |
| Strong | 25–60 mg | 25–60 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Dose ranges from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki community consensus and Bluelight megathread reports. Most users report effects at 10-25 mg with ceiling effects around 50 mg. No published controlled dosing study exists. Community hepatotoxicity warning applies at heavy tier (60+ mg). | ||
ReasoningReasoningDose ranges from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki community consensus and Bluelight megathread reports. Most users report effects at 10-25 mg with ceiling effects around 50 mg. No published controlled dosing study exists. Community hepatotoxicity warning applies at heavy tier (60+ mg). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 20–45 minutes | 20–45 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Onset 20-45 minutes from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki and Bluelight community consensus. Consistent with moderate LogP (1.219) and rapid oral absorption. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset 20-45 minutes from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki and Bluelight community consensus. Consistent with moderate LogP (1.219) and rapid oral absorption. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from work-notes based on community reports describing gradual build after onset. No published data; inferred from total duration envelope and class pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from work-notes based on community reports describing gradual build after onset. No published data; inferred from total duration envelope and class pharmacology. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from work-notes based on total 5-7 hour duration and pemoline class pharmacology (Tmax 2-4 hours). No published cyclazodone-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from work-notes based on total 5-7 hour duration and pemoline class pharmacology (Tmax 2-4 hours). No published cyclazodone-specific data. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Offsettrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from work-notes. Derived from total duration (5-7 hours) minus onset/come_up/peak. Community reports describe gradual decline in the final 1-2 hours of subjective effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from work-notes. Derived from total duration (5-7 hours) minus onset/come_up/peak. Community reports describe gradual decline in the final 1-2 hours of subjective effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 5–7 hours | 5–7 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Total duration 5-7 hours from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki and Bluelight community consensus. Consistent with pemoline reference (half-life 7-12 hours). | ||
ReasoningReasoningTotal duration 5-7 hours from existing DB seed data, confirmed by PsychonautWiki and Bluelight community consensus. Consistent with pemoline reference (half-life 7-12 hours). Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–6 hours | 2–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from work-notes. Community reports describe residual fatigue and emotional flatness lasting several hours after primary effects subside. No published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from work-notes. Community reports describe residual fatigue and emotional flatness lasting several hours after primary effects subside. No published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | low |
| Chronic | high | high | low |
| Organs Affected | hepatic, cardiovascular, skeletal muscle, central nervous system | hepatic, cardiovascular, skeletal muscle, central nervous system | low |
| Editorial | Acute toxicity rated moderate per work-notes: organ damage plausible from clinical case (N-methyl-cyclazodone NACCT 2022) but evidence is limited to one supratherapeutic case with confounds. Chronic toxicity rated high per work-notes based on pemoline's documented fatal hepatotoxicity record — however, applying evidence discount rule: all evidence is class-extrapolated from pemoline (one substituent difference), so confidence is low. No cyclazodone-specific toxicity data exist in any species. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute toxicity rated moderate per work-notes: organ damage plausible from clinical case (N-methyl-cyclazodone NACCT 2022) but evidence is limited to one supratherapeutic case with confounds. Chronic toxicity rated high per work-notes based on pemoline's documented fatal hepatotoxicity record — however, applying evidence discount rule: all evidence is class-extrapolated from pemoline (one substituent difference), so confidence is low. No cyclazodone-specific toxicity data exist in any species. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | low | low | low |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | moderate | moderate | low |
| Dose Escalation | low | low | low |
| Editorial | All dependence parameters from work-notes. No formal dependence assessment exists for cyclazodone. Values inferred from community reports (Bluelight megathread — fatigue/malaise on discontinuation) and class inference from pemoline/dopaminergic stimulant pharmacology. Pemoline was Schedule IV indicating recognized but limited abuse potential. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll dependence parameters from work-notes. No formal dependence assessment exists for cyclazodone. Values inferred from community reports (Bluelight megathread — fatigue/malaise on discontinuation) and class inference from pemoline/dopaminergic stimulant pharmacology. Pemoline was Schedule IV indicating recognized but limited abuse potential. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | mild | mild | low |
| Symptoms | fatigue, malaise, rebound depression, reduced motivation, increased appetite | fatigue, malaise, rebound depression, reduced motivation, increased appetite | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | Withdrawal characterized as mild per work-notes. Symptoms (fatigue, malaise, rebound depression) reported by Bluelight users after daily use discontinuation. Onset within 24 hours and 2-5 day duration inferred from dopaminergic stimulant class. No cyclazodone-specific withdrawal study exists. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWithdrawal characterized as mild per work-notes. Symptoms (fatigue, malaise, rebound depression) reported by Bluelight users after daily use discontinuation. Onset within 24 hours and 2-5 day duration inferred from dopaminergic stimulant class. No cyclazodone-specific withdrawal study exists. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 10.5 days | 10.5 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | amphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, other dopaminergic stimulants | amphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, other dopaminergic stimulants | low |
| Editorial | Tolerance values from existing DB seed data / PsychonautWiki community consensus. Work-notes flag these as unverified community estimates. Cross-tolerances inferred from shared DAT-mediated dopamine elevation mechanism. Mechanism is class inference from dopaminergic stimulant pharmacology, not cyclazodone-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance values from existing DB seed data / PsychonautWiki community consensus. Work-notes flag these as unverified community estimates. Cross-tolerances inferred from shared DAT-mediated dopamine elevation mechanism. Mechanism is class inference from dopaminergic stimulant pharmacology, not cyclazodone-specific data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| hepatic Hepatic impairment or liver diseasetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-inferred from pemoline hepatotoxicity record (21+ liver failures, 13 transplants/deaths). No cyclazodone-specific case but structural similarity is high (one substituent difference). | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-inferred from pemoline hepatotoxicity record (21+ liver failures, 13 transplants/deaths). No cyclazodone-specific case but structural similarity is high (one substituent difference). | |||
| other Concurrent MAO inhibitor usetrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Universal class-level contraindication for all monoamine reuptake inhibitors combined with MAOIs. No cyclazodone-specific data but mechanism is well-established. | ||
ReasoningReasoningUniversal class-level contraindication for all monoamine reuptake inhibitors combined with MAOIs. No cyclazodone-specific data but mechanism is well-established. | |||
| other Concurrent tramadol usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Designated lethal in DB. Mechanism-based rationale is strong (additive monoamine burden + seizure risk). No cyclazodone-specific case but tramadol fatalities with similar drug classes are published. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDesignated lethal in DB. Mechanism-based rationale is strong (additive monoamine burden + seizure risk). No cyclazodone-specific case but tramadol fatalities with similar drug classes are published. | |||
| cardiovascular Baseline QTc prolongation or cardiac arrhythmiatrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | QTc 526 ms documented in N-methyl-cyclazodone case (NACCT 2022). While dose was supratherapeutic with polypharmacy confounds, the cardiac signal warrants absolute contraindication for those with baseline conduction abnormalities. | ||
ReasoningReasoningQTc 526 ms documented in N-methyl-cyclazodone case (NACCT 2022). While dose was supratherapeutic with polypharmacy confounds, the cardiac signal warrants absolute contraindication for those with baseline conduction abnormalities. | |||
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level risk for all catecholaminergic stimulants. Tachycardia/hypertension documented in the N-methyl-cyclazodone case and in community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level risk for all catecholaminergic stimulants. Tachycardia/hypertension documented in the N-methyl-cyclazodone case and in community reports. | |||
| psychiatric History of stimulant psychosistrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level risk for all catecholaminergic stimulants. No cyclazodone-specific data but dopaminergic mechanism makes psychosis risk inherent. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level risk for all catecholaminergic stimulants. No cyclazodone-specific data but dopaminergic mechanism makes psychosis risk inherent. | |||
| other Concurrent SSRI usetrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | NACCT 2022 case involved concurrent fluoxetine. CYP2A6 interaction potential identified in Gampfer et al. 2026. Interaction is uncharacterized but the single case raises concern. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNACCT 2022 case involved concurrent fluoxetine. CYP2A6 interaction potential identified in Gampfer et al. 2026. Interaction is uncharacterized but the single case raises concern. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level concern for stimulants. QRS widening in clinical case suggests sodium channel activity. No cyclazodone-specific seizure data but absence of safety data warrants caution. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level concern for stimulants. QRS widening in clinical case suggests sodium channel activity. No cyclazodone-specific seizure data but absence of safety data warrants caution. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancytrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | No reproductive toxicology data exist. Precautionary absolute contraindication based on complete absence of safety data and class-level concerns with catecholaminergic stimulants during pregnancy. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo reproductive toxicology data exist. Precautionary absolute contraindication based on complete absence of safety data and class-level concerns with catecholaminergic stimulants during pregnancy. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Onset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 900–1800 sec(i=0.35) | 900–1800 sec(i=0.35) | low |
| Editorial | Onset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=1.00) | 7200–14400 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Onset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.35) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.35) | low |
| Editorial | Onset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.10) | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | Onset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. | ||
ReasoningReasoningOnset and total duration from community consensus (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases estimated from work-notes based on total duration envelope and pemoline class pharmacology. No published pharmacokinetic data for cyclazodone; all phase boundaries are community-derived or inferred. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
Mild cognitive stimulation becomes clearly noticeable — focus enhancement and motivation enhancement emerge as the dominant effects, producing increased engagement with tasks. A subtle appetite suppression may be present. Mood is gently elevated with a clean, functional character; euphoria is absent. Physical stimulation is minimal. Slight wakefulness and mild dry mouth may occur. Cardiovascular effects are not typically perceived at this level. This range (5–15 mg) is where many users first perceive cyclazodone as distinct from placebo. Functional impairment is not expected. Sleep may be mildly delayed if taken in the afternoon.
Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community reports consistently describe this range as functional/nootropic without significant side effects. PsychonautWiki 5-15 mg oral.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community reports consistently describe this range as functional/nootropic without significant side effects. PsychonautWiki 5-15 mg oral.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Minimal perceptible stimulation manifesting as a slight increase in alertness and wakefulness without pronounced cognitive enhancement. A subtle mood brightening may be noticed — faint enough that some users describe the effects as indistinguishable from placebo. Physical effects are negligible at this level. No meaningful appetite suppression, cardiovascular changes, or somatic stimulation. The experience is subthreshold for most functional purposes. Duration of commitment is shorter than at higher tiers, with effects fading within 3–5 hours. Sleep is unlikely to be affected if taken before midday.
Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific texture from community reports (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Threshold at 5 mg oral per community consensus.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific texture from community reports (PsychonautWiki, Bluelight). Threshold at 5 mg oral per community consensus.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Clear cognitive enhancement defines this tier — focus enhancement, thought organization, analysis enhancement, and information processing improvement are prominent. Motivation enhancement is strong, and many users describe this as the optimal dose range for sustained productive work. Verbal fluency may improve. Cognitive euphoria is mild but present. Appetite suppression is moderate. Physical stimulation is noticeable but not dominant — cyclazodone's character remains more cognitive than somatic across all tiers. Mild dry mouth, dehydration sensation, and slight restlessness may occur. Pupil dilation is possible. This range (15–25 mg) represents the community consensus for functional/nootropic use. Insomnia is likely if taken after midday. Total duration is 5–7 hours.
Work-notes common tier summary expanded. This is the most extensively reported dose range in Bluelight megathread and PsychonautWiki. Users consistently describe it as optimal for nootropic purposes.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes common tier summary expanded. This is the most extensively reported dose range in Bluelight megathread and PsychonautWiki. Users consistently describe it as optimal for nootropic purposes.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Pronounced stimulation with emerging adverse effects. While cognitive enhancement may still be present, it begins to plateau or deteriorate as physical side effects become prominent — restlessness, anxiety, muscle tension, and tachycardia. Thought acceleration may become uncomfortable rather than productive. Compulsive redosing urge emerges at this level. Appetite is strongly suppressed. Excessive sweating, temperature dysregulation, and vasoconstriction may occur. Abnormal heartbeat perception becomes more likely. The cognitive-to-somatic ratio shifts unfavorably compared to common doses. Ceiling effects are reported around 50 mg — higher doses within this range produce diminishing cognitive returns with increasing side effect burden. Insomnia is expected for the duration plus several hours. Irritability may emerge during the offset phase.
Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Community reports describe diminishing returns above 50 mg with increased adverse effects. Bluelight megathread documents the shift from functional to uncomfortable stimulation.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Community reports describe diminishing returns above 50 mg with increased adverse effects. Bluelight megathread documents the shift from functional to uncomfortable stimulation.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Extreme stimulation with significant adverse effect burden. Cardiovascular strain becomes pronounced — tachycardia, hypertension, and abnormal heartbeat are expected. One user report describes heart rate reaching 200 BPM at high doses. Anxiety may escalate to paranoia. Risk of movement abnormalities increases based on the choreiform movements documented in the N-methyl-cyclazodone toxicity case. Cognitive returns are strongly diminished. Thought acceleration may become disorganized rather than productive. Delusions are possible with sleep deprivation. Depersonalization may occur rarely. Community sources explicitly warn of hepatotoxicity risk at this tier, citing the pemoline-class liver failure precedent. Doses above 60 mg should be considered high-risk given complete absence of controlled safety data. Sleep is impossible for the duration plus many hours.
Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. Community hepatotoxicity warnings are specific to this tier. NACCT 2022 case (N-methyl-cyclazodone at extreme doses) informs adverse effect expectations. No controlled data at these doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. Community hepatotoxicity warnings are specific to this tier. NACCT 2022 case (N-methyl-cyclazodone at extreme doses) informs adverse effect expectations. No controlled data at these doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]strongPharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).Docherty JR · 2008 · British Journal of Pharmacology
- [2]strongDesigner drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effectsLuethi D, Liechti ME · 2020 · Archives of Toxicology
- [3]weakNCATS Inxight Drugs - CyclazodoneNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences · 2024linkno claims checked
- [4]weak
- [5]weak
- [6]weak
- [7]weakPemoline hepatotoxicity in childrenMarotta PJ, Roberts EA · 1998 · The Journal of Pediatricspubmed 96022114 claims checked1 verified2 partial1 inconclusive
- [8]weakToxicity from the NPS N-Methyl-Cyclazodone with Laboratory Confirmation - A Dance Befitting St. VitusCFSRE · 2022linkno claims checked
- [9]weak
- [10]moderateAminorex and the pulmonary circulationKay JM, Smith PE, Heath D · 1971 · Thorax
- [11]moderateThe effect of anticoagulant therapy in primary and anorectic drug-induced pulmonary hypertensionFrank H, Mlczoch J, Huber K, Schuster E, Gurtner HP, Kneussl M · 1997 · Chestpubmed 93158052 claims checked2 inconclusive
- [12]moderateA surveillance method for the early identification of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactionsEtwel FA, Rieder MJ, Bend JR, Koren G · 2008 · Drug Safetypubmed 182177922 claims checked2 verified
- [13]weakCharacterization of a novel and potentially lethal designer drug (+/-)-cis-para-methyl-4-methylaminorex (4,4'-DMAR)Brandt SD, Baumann MH, Partilla JS, Kavanagh PV, Power JD, et al. · 2014 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [14]moderateToxicokinetic Studies of the Two Stimulants M-ALPHA and N-Methyl-cyclazodone Using In Vitro and In Vivo ToolsGampfer TM, Klaes S, Eckstein N, Meyer MR · 2026 · Metabolitesdoi.org/10.3390/metabo160502913 claims checked3 inconclusive
- [15]weak
- [16]weakPemoline Pharmacokinetics and Long-Term Clinical PharmacologyClinical Pharmacokinetics journal · 1985linkno claims checked
- [17]moderatePharmacological characterization of the aminorex analogs 4-MAR, 4,4'-DMAR, and 3,4-DMAR.Rickli A, Kolaczynska K, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2019 · Neurotoxicology
- [18]moderateThe Psychonauts' World of Cognitive EnhancersNapoletano F, Schifano F, Corkery JM, Guirguis A, Arillotta D, Zangani C, Vento A · 2020 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
- [19]weakPemoline-associated fulminant liver failure: testing the evidence for causationBerkovitch M, Pope E, Phillips J, Koren G · 1995 · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeuticspubmed 77812702 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
- [20]weakHepatotoxicity due to pemoline (Cylert): a report of two casesPratt DS, Dubois RS · 1990 · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutritionpubmed 23039761 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [21]weakFour cases of severe hepatotoxicity associated with pemoline: possible autoimmune pathogenesisRosh JR, Dellert SF, Narkewicz M, Birnbaum A, Whitington G · 1998 · Pediatricspubmed 95654251 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [22]weakPemoline therapy resulting in liver transplantationAdcock KG, MacElroy DE, Wolford ET, Farrington EA · 1998 · The Annals of Pharmacotherapypubmed 95621361 claim checked1 verified
- [23]weakCyclazodone Review, Dosage & Effects - Nootropics JunkieNootropics Junkie editorial · 2023linkno claims checked
- [24]weakLethal combination of tramadol and multiple drugs affecting serotoninRipple MG, Pestaner JP, Levine BS, Smialek JE · 2000 · American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathologypubmed 111118002 claims checked2 verified
- [25]strongMechanisms of tramadol-related neurotoxicity in the rat: Does diazepam/tramadol combination play a worsening role in overdose?Lagard C, Chevillard L, Malissin I, Risède P, Callebert J, Labat L, Launay JM, Laplanche JL, Mégarbane B · 2016 · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary4 claims1verified1partial2inconclusive
inconclusiveIts pharmacological classification as a norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) with dexamphetamine-like actions rests on structural analogy to pemoline rather than direct receptor binding data.[1]model confidence 75%
The abstract confirms dexamphetamine-like stimulant actions and pemoline’s dopaminergic profile, but does not address the epistemological basis of the NDRI classification — specifically whether it rests on structural analogy rather than direct receptor binding data. That methodological claim cannot be verified from this abstract.
Cyclazodone noted to have 'stimulant actions similar to the effects of dexamphetamine'. Pemoline classified as predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveIts pharmacological classification as a norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) with dexamphetamine-like actions rests on structural analogy to pemoline rather than direct receptor binding data.[2]model confidence 75%
The abstract confirms dexamphetamine-like stimulant actions but does not address whether the NDRI classification is based on structural analogy rather than direct receptor binding data. That epistemological claim is not verifiable from this abstract.
Cyclazodone noted to have stimulant actions similar to dexamphetamine. Stimulants act via monoamine transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedIts presumed mechanism — inhibition of the dopamine and norepinephrine transporters — is inferred from pemoline’s established dopaminergic profile and from the broader aminorex-class pharmacology[1]model confidence 80%
The abstract directly establishes pemoline’s classification as a predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic with reuptake blockade as a core mechanism — the very basis the claim cites for the mechanistic inference.
Pemoline classified as predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic, withdrawn due to liver problems. Monoaminomimetic mechanisms include reuptake blockade, indirect release, and direct receptor activation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
partialThe primary safety concern is potential hepatotoxicity inherited from the pemoline class: pemoline caused at least 21 cases of liver failure, 13 requiring transplantation or resulting in death[7]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms pemoline hepatotoxicity with liver transplant, supporting the general safety concern. However, the specific numbers claimed (21 cases; 13 requiring transplantation or resulting in death) are materially larger than what this abstract documents (5 cases, 1 transplant). The cited figures appear to derive from a larger dataset not represented in this paper.
Five cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity including one liver transplant. Severity variable; onset may be late.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
history6 claims3verified3inconclusive
verifiedIts withdrawal followed a 20-fold increase in the incidence of primary pulmonary hypertension in Switzerland.[10]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly and precisely confirms aminorex caused a 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension in Switzerland.
Aminorex (2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazoline) caused 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension in Switzerland 1965-1968.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveIts withdrawal followed a 20-fold increase in the incidence of primary pulmonary hypertension in Switzerland.[11]model confidence 80%
The abstract covers aminorex-induced PPH clinical outcomes (prognosis, anticoagulation) but does not mention the 20-fold incidence increase. The specific statistic anchoring the claim cannot be verified from this abstract.
Retrospective study of 173 patients: aminorex-induced PPH had better prognosis than idiopathic PPH (7.5 vs 3.9 years). Anticoagulation improved outcomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedIt was withdrawn from most markets by the mid-2000s following recognition of fatal idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity.[12]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms pemoline was withdrawn due to fatal hepatotoxicity. The mid-2000s timing and ‘most markets’ scope are not explicitly stated but the core claim (withdrawal for fatal hepatotoxicity) is directly confirmed and not contradicted.
Pemoline introduced US 1975 for ADHD; withdrawn due to fatal hepatotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveIt was withdrawn from most markets by the mid-2000s following recognition of fatal idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity.[7]model confidence 82%
The abstract documents five cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity with one transplant, establishing the safety concern, but does not address regulatory withdrawal or market history. The withdrawal claim cannot be verified from this abstract.
Five cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity including one liver transplant. Severity variable; onset may be late.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verified4,4’-DMAR (cis-para-methyl-4-methylaminorex), a ring-substituted aminorex analog, was associated with at least 26 deaths in Europe in 2013, demonstrating the fatality potential inherent to this structural class.[13]model confidence 99%
The abstract directly confirms 26 deaths associated with 4,4’-DMAR in Europe in 2013, precisely matching the claim.
26 deaths associated with 4,4'-DMAR in Europe 2013. Potent substrate releaser at DAT, NET, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveToxicokinetic studies confirmed that N-methyl-cyclazodone is N-demethylated by CYP2A6 to produce cyclazodone as its primary active phase I metabolite, establishing that users of N-methyl-cyclazodone are also exposed to cyclazodone systemically.[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract not available. The SCOPE describes exactly this finding (CYP2A6-mediated N-demethylation to cyclazodone), consistent with the claim, but the abstract cannot be independently verified as instructed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
pharmacology4 claims3verified1inconclusive
verifiedCyclazodone is classified as a norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) with stimulant actions pharmacologically similar to dexamphetamine[2]model confidence 90%
The abstract directly confirms cyclazodone has stimulant actions similar to dexamphetamine and that stimulants act via monoamine transporters, supporting the NDRI classification.
Cyclazodone noted to have stimulant actions similar to dexamphetamine. Stimulants act via monoamine transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedCyclazodone is classified as a norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) with stimulant actions pharmacologically similar to dexamphetamine[1]model confidence 90%
The abstract directly confirms cyclazodone has stimulant actions similar to dexamphetamine, and the review context covers monoaminomimetic mechanisms including reuptake blockade, supporting the NDRI classification.
Cyclazodone noted to have 'stimulant actions similar to the effects of dexamphetamine'.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedPemoline, the closest characterized structural comparator (differing only at N-2: amino vs. cyclopropylamino), functions as a predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic — primarily a dopamine reuptake inhibitor with weak dopamine-releasing properties and minimal noradrenergic activity relative to amphetamine[1]model confidence 82%
The abstract directly uses the phrase ‘predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic’ for pemoline and lists reuptake blockade and indirect release as mechanisms. The granular details (weak releasing, minimal noradrenergic) go beyond the abstract but the core classification is confirmed.
Pemoline classified as predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic, withdrawn due to liver problems. Monoaminomimetic mechanisms include reuptake blockade, indirect release, and direct receptor activation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveBoth parent and metabolite demonstrate low-to-moderate plasma protein binding[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract not available. The SCOPE notes this paper documents low-to-moderate plasma protein binding, but the abstract itself was not provided for independent verification.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
receptor pharmacology3 claims3verified
verified4-Methylaminorex (4-MAR): Preferential inhibition at NET and DAT with an amphetamine-like transporter profile.[17]model confidence 99%
The abstract directly confirms 4-MAR has an amphetamine-like NET/DAT profile, matching the claim precisely.
4-MAR has amphetamine-like NET/DAT profile.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verified4,4’-DMAR (cis-para-methyl-4-methylaminorex): Potent inhibition of all three monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, SERT) with an MDMA-like serotonergic component.[17]model confidence 95%
The abstract directly confirms 4,4’-DMAR potently inhibits all three transporters. The ‘MDMA-like serotonergic component’ is a reasonable characterization of triple-transporter inhibition with significant SERT activity.
4,4'-DMAR potently inhibits all three transporters. Negligible monoamine receptor binding (Ki >2 uM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verified4,4’-DMAR (cis-para-methyl-4-methylaminorex): Potent inhibition of all three monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, SERT) with an MDMA-like serotonergic component.[13]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms potent substrate releasing activity at all three transporters with EC50 values, confirming serotonergic involvement alongside DAT and NET activity.
Potent substrate releaser at DAT, NET, SERT. EC50 values: 8.6 nM DAT, 26.9 nM NET, 18.5 nM SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
neuroscience1 claim1verified
verifiedIs there serotonergic involvement? Some aminorex analogs (4,4’-DMAR) show significant SERT activity. Whether cyclazodone has any serotonergic component is untested.[17]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms 4,4’-DMAR potently inhibits all three transporters including SERT, establishing significant serotonergic activity in this aminorex analog.
4,4'-DMAR potently inhibits all three transporters. Negligible monoamine receptor binding (Ki >2 uM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveGampfer et al. (2026) characterized N-methyl-cyclazodone metabolism using in vitro (human liver microsomes, recombinant CYP isoforms) and in vivo tools:[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract not available. The paper title and SCOPE are consistent with the claim (in vitro/in vivo toxicokinetic studies, CYP2A6), but the abstract cannot be independently verified as instructed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
safety14 claims9verified1partial4inconclusive
verifiedTramadol-induced neurotoxicity involves early elevation of brain serotonin and norepinephrine concentrations[25]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms tramadol produces early-onset neurological effects including serotonin and norepinephrine increases in the brain, matching the claim precisely.
Tramadol induces dose-dependent sedation, early-onset seizures, and serotonin/norepinephrine increase in brain.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
partialAt least 21 cases of pemoline-related liver failure were documented; 13 required liver transplantation or resulted in death[7]model confidence 92%
The abstract confirms pemoline hepatotoxicity with liver transplant but the specific numbers (21 cases; 13 requiring transplantation or death) are materially larger than the 5 cases with 1 transplant described in this abstract. These figures appear to derive from a larger aggregate dataset than this paper alone.
Five cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity including one liver transplant. Severity variable; onset may be late.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveReactions were idiosyncratic and unpredictable, sometimes occurring after months to years of uneventful use[19]model confidence 70%
The abstract is too sparse to verify this specific claim. It confirms fatal pemoline hepatotoxicity but does not mention idiosyncratic timing or the months-to-years latency period. This detail may reside in the full text.
Review of pemoline hepatotoxicity cases including fatal liver failure.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveReactions were idiosyncratic and unpredictable, sometimes occurring after months to years of uneventful use[20]model confidence 72%
The abstract documents the spectrum of pemoline hepatotoxicity severity but does not specifically address idiosyncratic nature or the months-to-years latency timeline described in the claim.
Two cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity: mild aminotransferase elevation and fulminant hepatic failure with submassive hepatic necrosis. Spectrum of hepatic disease discussed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusiveA possible autoimmune mechanism was proposed based on clinical presentation patterns[21]model confidence 90%
Abstract not available. The paper title strongly implies the claim is supported (‘possible autoimmune pathogenesis’), but the abstract itself cannot be verified as instructed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedPemoline was withdrawn from the US market due to fatal hepatotoxicity[12]model confidence 99%
The abstract directly confirms pemoline was introduced to the US in 1975 for ADHD and subsequently withdrawn due to fatal hepatotoxicity.
Pemoline introduced US 1975 for ADHD; withdrawn due to fatal hepatotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedLiver transplantation was required in documented cases[22]model confidence 99%
The abstract directly describes a case of pemoline-induced liver failure that resulted in liver transplantation, directly confirming the claim.
Case of pemoline-induced liver failure resulting in liver transplantation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedPulmonary hypertension (class risk): Aminorex caused a 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension incidence. This risk has not been evaluated for cyclazodone. The structural difference (oxazolidinone vs. oxazoline ring) may or may not confer protection[10]model confidence 95%
The abstract directly confirms aminorex caused a 20-fold increase in PPH in Switzerland. Editorial statements about cyclazodone evaluation and structural differences are author commentary that the citation need not independently confirm.
Aminorex (2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazoline) caused 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension in Switzerland 1965-1968.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
inconclusivePulmonary hypertension (class risk): Aminorex caused a 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension incidence. This risk has not been evaluated for cyclazodone. The structural difference (oxazolidinone vs. oxazoline ring) may or may not confer protection[11]model confidence 78%
The abstract confirms aminorex-induced PPH as a clinical entity (prognosis, anticoagulation outcomes) but does not mention the 20-fold incidence figure that anchors the primary factual claim.
Retrospective study of 173 patients: aminorex-induced PPH had better prognosis than idiopathic PPH (7.5 vs 3.9 years). Anticoagulation improved outcomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedThe first reported tramadol-related fatality involved combination with serotonergic/noradrenergic agents, producing fatal seizure activity[24]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms this is the first reported tramadol death, that it involved serotonergic drug combinations (venlafaxine, trazodone, quetiapine), and that the patient died following a seizure.
First reported death from tramadol combination with serotonergic drugs. 36yo male died after seizure while on tramadol, venlafaxine, trazodone, quetiapine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedAminorex analogs with serotonergic activity have been associated with fatalities[13]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms 26 deaths associated with 4,4’-DMAR, a potent SERT-active substrate releaser — establishing that a serotonergically active aminorex analog has caused fatalities.
26 deaths associated with 4,4'-DMAR in Europe 2013. Potent substrate releaser at DAT, NET, SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedAbsolute contraindications (class-inferred): * Hepatic impairment or pre-existing liver disease: The pemoline-class hepatotoxicity risk makes any hepatic compromise a basis for absolute avoidance * Concurrent MAO inhibitor use: Risk of hypertensive crisis and fatal monoamine accumulation * Concurrent tramadol: Lethal interaction risk via seizure and monoamine toxicity mechanisms * Baseline QTc prolongation or cardiac arrhythmia: QTc prolongation documented with N-methyl-cyclazodone[7]model confidence 82%
This citation supports the hepatic impairment contraindication specifically, which it directly backs via severe pemoline hepatotoxicity evidence including liver transplant. The other contraindications in the list are supported by separate citations.
Five cases of pemoline hepatotoxicity including one liver transplant. Severity variable; onset may be late.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedAbsolute contraindications (class-inferred): * Hepatic impairment or pre-existing liver disease: The pemoline-class hepatotoxicity risk makes any hepatic compromise a basis for absolute avoidance * Concurrent MAO inhibitor use: Risk of hypertensive crisis and fatal monoamine accumulation * Concurrent tramadol: Lethal interaction risk via seizure and monoamine toxicity mechanisms * Baseline QTc prolongation or cardiac arrhythmia: QTc prolongation documented with N-methyl-cyclazodone[19]model confidence 80%
This citation supports the hepatic impairment contraindication via evidence of fatal pemoline hepatotoxicity. Its role in the multi-part contraindication list is appropriate.
Review of pemoline hepatotoxicity cases including fatal liver failure.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedAbsolute contraindications (class-inferred): * Hepatic impairment or pre-existing liver disease: The pemoline-class hepatotoxicity risk makes any hepatic compromise a basis for absolute avoidance * Concurrent MAO inhibitor use: Risk of hypertensive crisis and fatal monoamine accumulation * Concurrent tramadol: Lethal interaction risk via seizure and monoamine toxicity mechanisms * Baseline QTc prolongation or cardiac arrhythmia: QTc prolongation documented with N-methyl-cyclazodone[24]model confidence 90%
This citation supports the concurrent tramadol contraindication, documenting a lethal tramadol + serotonergic drug combination with fatal seizure — directly establishing the lethal interaction risk.
First reported death from tramadol combination with serotonergic drugs. 36yo male died after seizure. Tramadol lowers seizure threshold; risk enhanced by concurrent SSRIs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
clinical evidence1 claim1verified
verifiedCyclazodone has been listed as a novel cognitive enhancer in academic reviews of new psychoactive substances, but no outcome data support this classification beyond user self-report.[18]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms cyclazodone is listed among novel cognitive enhancers in an academic review, identified through psychonauts (user self-report). The absence of outcome data is consistent with psychonaut-identified categorization.
Growing availability of NPS including cognitive enhancers. Cyclazodone listed among novel cognitive enhancers identified by psychonauts.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
comparative pharmacology2 claims2verified
verifiedData for aminorex analogs from Rickli et al. (2019) and Brandt et al. (2014).[17]model confidence 85%
The abstract is from a pharmacological characterization of aminorex analogs at monoamine transporters — exactly the type of source cited for aminorex analog data. Attribution is appropriate.
In vitro pharmacology of aminorex analogs at monoamine transporters. 4-MAR has amphetamine-like NET/DAT profile; 4,4'-DMAR potently inhibits all three transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
verifiedData for aminorex analogs from Rickli et al. (2019) and Brandt et al. (2014).[13]model confidence 85%
The abstract characterizes 4,4’-DMAR (an aminorex analog) at monoamine transporters with EC50 values — consistent with being a primary data source for aminorex analog pharmacology.
26 deaths associated with 4,4'-DMAR in Europe 2013. Potent substrate releaser at DAT, NET, SERT. EC50 values: 8.6 nM DAT, 26.9 nM NET, 18.5 nM SERT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
legal status1 claim1verified
verifiedCyclazodone is listed as a prohibited stimulant by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), classified alongside dexamphetamine-like stimulants as prohibited in competition.[1]model confidence 95%
The paper is explicitly a review of WADA-prohibited stimulants and directly mentions cyclazodone with dexamphetamine-like stimulant actions, confirming its WADA-prohibited status alongside dexamphetamine-class stimulants.
Review of 62 WADA-prohibited stimulants. Cyclazodone noted to have 'stimulant actions similar to the effects of dexamphetamine'.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 12, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 12, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | cyclazodone | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleOnly result; confirms chemical identity | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | cyclazodone pharmacology stimulant | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 3literature search | OpenAlex | cyclazodone oxazolidinone stimulant norepinephrine | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleRelevant as one of few academic papers mentioning cyclazodone | |||
| 4clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | cyclazodone | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 5literature search | PubMed | aminorex analogs oxazolinone norepinephrine dopamine reuptake inhibitor | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 6literature search | PubMed | 4,4-DMAR 4-methylaminorex aminorex analog monoamine transporter | 3 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAminorex class pharmacology directly relevant to understanding cyclazodone as substituted aminorex | |||
| 7literature search | OpenAlex | aminorex appetite suppressant pulmonary hypertension history pharmacology | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHistorical aminorex context; designer drug adverse effects review relevant to class | |||
| 8web search | WebSearch | cyclazodone research chemical stimulant pharmacology effects | 10 results, 4 selected |
| 9document retrieval | CFSRE.org | — | — results, 1 selected |
| 10document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | — | — results, 3 selected |
| 11web search | WebSearch | cyclazodone legal status scheduling UK US analog act | 10 results, 3 selected |
| 12web search | WebSearch | cyclazodone pemoline GB1005738 Les Laboratoires Dausse synthesis 1965 | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 13document retrieval | Chemsrc | — | — results, 1 selected |
| 14document retrieval | PMC/WADA pharmacology | — | — results, 2 selected |
| 15document retrieval | Bluelight.org | — | — results, 3 selected |
| 16cross reference | Crossref via verify_doi | 10.3390/metabo16050291 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 17literature search | PubMed | Docherty 2008 pharmacology stimulants prohibited WADA doping | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 18legal status search | WebSearch | cyclazodone psychoactive substances act 2016 UK scheduling status | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 19web search | WebSearch | cyclazodone TAAR1 trace amine mechanism action pharmacology | 10 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 10: All TAAR1 claims for cyclazodone are from community/nootropic sources, not peer-reviewed research; flagging as speculative | |||
| 20database lookup | NCATS Inxight Drugs | cyclazodone UNII O8U55ZRL9K | 1 result, 2 selected |
| 21web search | WebSearch | cyclazodone half-life pharmacokinetics published study | 10 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 10: No peer-reviewed PK studies found; community data only | |||
| 22data extraction | Cross-reference: multiple sources | cyclazodone tolerance half-life 5 days seed data verification | 0 results, 1 selected |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: Cyclazodone
## Chemical Identity
**Confirmed via PubChem (CID 135438121) and Chemsrc (CAS 14461-91-7):**
| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| IUPAC Name | 2-cyclopropylimino-5-phenyl-1,3-oxazolidin-4-one | PubChem [Ref 26] |
| Systematic name | 2-(Cyclopropylamino)-5-phenyl-2-oxazolin-4-one | NCATS [Ref 26] |
| CAS Number | 14461-91-7 | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| PubChem CID | 135438121 | PubChem |
| Molecular Formula | C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₂ | PubChem / Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| Molecular Weight | 216.24 g/mol | PubChem / Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| SMILES | O=C1NC(=NC2CC2)OC1c1ccccc1 | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| InChIKey | DNRKTAYPGADPGW-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem [Ref 17] |
| UNII (FDA) | O8U55ZRL9K | NCATS Inxight [Ref 26] |
| INN Registry | 2173 | NCATS Inxight [Ref 26] |
| Density | 1.4 g/cm³ | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| Boiling Point | 334.8 °C at 760 mmHg | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| Flash Point | 156.3 °C | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
| LogP | 1.219 | Chemsrc [Ref 17] |
**Stereochemistry:** Racemic mixture with one undefined stereocenter (NCATS Inxight [Ref 26]). No published data on enantiomer-specific activity.
**Synonyms confirmed:** Cyclazodone (INN), N-cyclopropylpemoline, cyclopropyl pemoline, 5-phenyl-2-cyclopropylamino-4-oxazolinone.
**Discrepancies with brief seed data:**
- Brief lists no SMILES; confirmed SMILES: `O=C1NC(=NC2CC2)OC1c1ccccc1`
- Brief lists no CAS, PubChem CID, InChIKey; all confirmed above
- Chemical class in brief: "Substituted aminorexe" — confirmed; cyclazodone belongs to the 4-oxazolidinone class and is structurally related to aminorex (2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazoline), pemoline, fenozolone, and thozalinone. The "substituted aminorex" designation is acceptable though the oxazolidinone (4-oxooxazolidine) ring distinguishes it from strict aminorex (2-amino-2-oxazoline) derivatives.
---
## Pharmacology
### Mechanism of Action
Cyclazodone is classified as a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) with stimulant actions similar to those of dexamphetamine (Docherty 2008 [Ref 19]; Luethi & Liechti 2020 [Ref 7]). These classifications derive from the pharmacology of its parent compound pemoline and the broader aminorex/oxazolidinone class.
**Pemoline's established mechanism** (the closest structurally published comparator): pemoline is classified as a predominantly dopaminergic monoaminomimetic (Docherty 2008 [Ref 19]). It functions primarily as a dopamine reuptake inhibitor with weak dopamine-releasing properties. Pemoline demonstrates minimal activity at norepinephrine pathways compared to amphetamine or methylphenidate (Stevenson & Wolraich 1989 [Ref — community ADHD review context]; Mignot et al. 1993 [Ref — canine narcolepsy study]).
**Aminorex class comparators:** Aminorex analogs act primarily via monoamine transporter inhibition or release. Among characterized aminorex derivatives:
- 4-MAR (4-methylaminorex): Preferential NET and DAT inhibition, amphetamine-like profile (Rickli et al. 2019 [Ref 2])
- 4,4'-DMAR: Potent inhibition of all three transporters (DAT, NET, SERT), MDMA-like serotonergic profile (Rickli et al. 2019 [Ref 2]; Brandt et al. 2014 [Ref 4])
- Cyclazodone's specific Ki/EC50 values at DAT, NET, or SERT have **not been published** in peer-reviewed literature.
**TAAR1 speculation:** Some community and nootropic sources claim cyclazodone activates TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1). This is speculative extrapolation from structural class similarities to amphetamine-like TAAR1 agonists. **No published research has characterized cyclazodone as a TAAR1 ligand.** This should not be presented as established pharmacology.
**⚠️ FLAG:** No published binding affinity (Ki or EC50) data for cyclazodone at any molecular target. All mechanistic claims derive from structural analog inference (pemoline pharmacology, aminorex class data).
### Pharmacokinetics
**No published human or animal pharmacokinetic studies exist for cyclazodone itself.**
Relevant inference from analog data:
- **Pemoline (structural comparator):** Oral absorption rapid; peak serum levels 2–4 hours post-dose; elimination half-life 7–12 hours (longer with age); ~50% plasma protein binding; hepatic metabolism; ~50% excreted unchanged in urine (Pemoline pharmacokinetics, Clinical Pharmacokinetics 1985 [Ref 27])
- **N-methyl-cyclazodone toxicokinetics:** CYP2A6-mediated N-demethylation produces cyclazodone as the primary phase I metabolite; low-to-moderate plasma protein binding for both N-methyl-cyclazodone and cyclazodone (Gampfer et al. 2026 [Ref 18])
**⚠️ FLAG — CRITICAL SEED DATA ERROR:** The brief's tolerance data lists a **half-life of "5 days"** for cyclazodone. This is not supported by any published source. Community reports describe effects lasting 4–7 hours (consistent with a drug half-life in the hour range, not days). Pemoline's half-life is 7–12 hours. The "5 days" figure in the tolerance table almost certainly refers to the tolerance half-life (time for tolerance to decay by 50%), not the elimination half-life of the drug itself — but even this value is unverified. The generation agent should not present "5-day half-life" as an elimination half-life. The tolerance buildup/reset data (half-life: 5 days; full reset: 1.5 weeks) may be community consensus estimates for tolerance decay kinetics, not pharmacokinetic half-life, but this is not confirmed.
**Oral bioavailability** and Tmax are not published for cyclazodone. Based on community reports of 20–45 minute onset, oral absorption appears reasonably rapid.
**CYP enzymes:** CYP2A6 confirmed for N-methyl-cyclazodone metabolism to cyclazodone (Gampfer et al. 2026 [Ref 18]). CYP enzymes responsible for cyclazodone's own downstream metabolism are not published.
### Duration of Effects
Community consensus (PsychonautWiki [Ref 14]; Bluelight megathread [Ref 16]): Onset 20–45 minutes; total duration 5–7 hours, oral. This is consistent with seed data and with the pharmacological profile of stimulants with similar structures.
---
## History
### Discovery and Synthesis
Cyclazodone was synthesized in the early 1960s by researchers at **Les Laboratoires Dausse** (Paris, France). The compound was described in **British patent GB 1,005,738** (issued 1965), with inventors listed as De Marne V, Pierre D, Guidicelli RL, and Najer H. The patent described 5-phenyl-2-cyclopropylamino-4-oxazolinone and its non-toxic acid addition salts as a central nervous system stimulant and anorexic agent suitable for oral administration.
Some sources attribute development to **American Cyanamid Company** (NCATS Inxight [Ref 26]; Graves 2023 [Ref 15]). This may reflect patent licensing or parallel development; the precise institutional history requires further archival verification. The British patent assignee is Les Laboratoires Dausse; American Cyanamid involvement is reported but not confirmed from patent records accessed in this research.
The rationale for development was to produce a safer CNS stimulant than pemoline and other N-alkyl-substituted pemoline derivatives, with more favorable therapeutic index. Animal studies reportedly showed that cyclazodone produced stimulatory effects including enhanced performance in continuous avoidance tasks in rats, with actions comparable to d-amphetamine and pemoline. Cardiotoxicity in mice was reportedly less than dexamphetamine.
Cyclazodone was patented but **never entered clinical development** and was never approved by any regulatory agency for human use (NCATS Inxight: status "Investigational" [Ref 26]). No human clinical trials were registered or completed.
### Market Appearance as Research Chemical
Cyclazodone had no documented history of recreational human use prior to approximately **2017**, when it appeared on online research chemical markets, primarily marketed as a nootropic powder (PsychonautWiki [Ref 14]; Graves 2023 [Ref 15]). The compound attracted attention from the psychonaut and nootropic communities as a cognitive enhancer and stimulant alternative to pharmaceutical ADHD medications.
N-methyl-cyclazodone (CAS 14461-92-8) emerged on the RC market as a related and reportedly more potent compound. Metabolically, N-methyl-cyclazodone is N-demethylated by CYP2A6 to produce cyclazodone as its primary active phase I metabolite (Gampfer et al. 2026 [Ref 18]).
### Regulatory Context of Parent Class
**Aminorex** (2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazoline), the structural parent of this compound class, was marketed as an anorectic in Switzerland, Austria, and Germany from 1965 to 1968. Its withdrawal followed a 20-fold increase in primary pulmonary hypertension incidence in Switzerland (Kay et al. 1971 [Ref 5]; Frank et al. 1997 [Ref 6]).
**Pemoline**, the closest structural analog of cyclazodone, was approved for ADHD treatment in the US (1975) but was withdrawn from most markets by the mid-2000s due to fatal idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity (Etwel et al. 2008 [Ref 12]; Marotta & Roberts 1998 [Ref 9]). This regulatory history is directly relevant to cyclazodone's risk profile.
**4,4'-DMAR** (a ring-substituted methylaminorex) was associated with at least 26 deaths in Europe in 2013 (Brandt et al. 2014 [Ref 4]), demonstrating the serious fatality potential of aminorex-class analogs.
---
## Subjective Effects
No controlled human studies of cyclazodone's subjective effects exist. All data derives from user reports.
**Reported effects from community sources (Bluelight megathread [Ref 16]; PsychonautWiki [Ref 14]; Nootropics Junkie [Ref 22]):**
**Cognitive/nootropic effects:**
- Enhanced focus and concentration (described as comparable to amphetamine by some users)
- Improved verbal fluency and information retention
- Mild mood elevation; antidepressant-like quality reported at medium doses
- Motivation enhancement; wakefulness
- Low euphoric potential compared to amphetamine — described as "clean" stimulation
- Comparison to modafinil in terms of subtle effect profile
**Stimulant/physical effects:**
- Physical stimulation and energy without pronounced jitteriness at low-to-moderate doses
- Increased heart rate (tachycardia); one user report of HR up to 200 BPM at high doses
- Elevated blood pressure
- Appetite suppression
- Dry mouth, dehydration
**Adverse effects reported:**
- Physical anxiety at higher doses (users report this fades with continued use)
- Fatigue and malaise upon discontinuation following daily use
- Headaches (some cases requiring benzodiazepine intervention per user reports)
- Compulsive redosing urge reported at higher doses
**Dose ranges from community consensus (PsychonautWiki [Ref 14]):**
- Threshold: 5 mg oral
- Light: 5–15 mg oral
- Common: 15–25 mg oral
- Strong: 25–60 mg oral
- Heavy: 60+ mg oral (hepatotoxicity warning noted at heavy doses)
- Most users report effects at 10–25 mg; ceiling effects reported at ~50 mg
**Duration (community consensus [Ref 14, 16]):**
- Onset: 20–45 minutes oral
- Total duration: 5–7 hours oral
- No significant advantage observed with intranasal administration per user reports
**Seed data doses and durations confirmed by community consensus; no published controlled study data available.**
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Published Case Data
**N-Methyl-cyclazodone toxicity case** (CFSRE 2022 [Ref 13]; Basile et al., NACCT 2022 abstract): A 38-year-old male self-administered approximately 5 grams of N-methyl-cyclazodone dissolved in water over 5 days to self-treat attention deficit disorder. He was concurrently taking prescribed fluoxetine and aripiprazole for bipolar disorder. He presented with:
- Uncontrollable choreiform (dance-like) body movements affecting the entire body
- Inattention, restlessness, tremor
- Tachycardia: HR 110/min
- Hypertension: 150/90 mmHg
- Tachypnea: RR 24/min
- Dilated, reactive pupils
- ECG: Sinus tachycardia, **QRS 140 ms, QTc 526 ms** (critically prolonged)
- Creatine kinase elevated: **2954 U/L** (rhabdomyolysis marker)
- Alanine aminotransferase elevated: **104 U/L** (hepatic injury marker)
- Standard urine immunoassay: NEGATIVE (highlighting detection challenge)
- LC-HRMS urinary confirmation: cyclazodone confirmed as metabolite of N-methyl-cyclazodone; pemoline and 4-methylaminorex ruled out
Treatment: IV crystalloid fluids, lorazepam (movement disorder, autonomic hyperactivity), sodium bicarbonate (shortened widened QRS), magnesium supplementation. Symptoms resolved by hospital day 3 with normalizing enzyme levels.
**Clinical significance:** This case demonstrates (1) that cyclazodone is an active phase I metabolite of N-methyl-cyclazodone; (2) QTc prolongation as a serious cardiac risk; (3) rhabdomyolysis potential; (4) hepatotoxic signal (elevated ALT); (5) chorea/movement disorder risk; (6) detection failure on standard immunoassay requiring HRMS confirmation.
**Note:** The case involved N-methyl-cyclazodone at a very high cumulative dose (5g over 5 days) and concurrent SSRI (fluoxetine), complicating attribution of individual effects.
### Hepatotoxicity Concern (Class-Based)
No direct human hepatotoxicity cases from cyclazodone use have been identified in published literature. However, significant concern arises from pemoline's (structural analog) well-documented hepatotoxicity record:
- At least 21 cases of pemoline-related liver failure documented; 13 required liver transplantation or resulted in death (Marotta & Roberts 1998 [Ref 9])
- Approximately 1–2% of pemoline patients developed elevated serum aminotransferases
- Reactions were idiosyncratic and unpredictable — sometimes occurring after years of uneventful use (Berkovitch et al. 1995 [Ref 11]; Pratt & Dubois 1990 [Ref 24])
- Possible autoimmune mechanism proposed (Rosh et al. 1998 [Ref 23])
- Pemoline was withdrawn from US market due to fatal hepatotoxicity (Etwel et al. 2008 [Ref 12])
- Liver transplantation cases documented (Adcock et al. 1998 [Ref 10])
- PsychonautWiki warns of hepatic damage with heavy or sustained cyclazodone use [Ref 14]
- The CFSRE case showed ALT elevation with N-methyl-cyclazodone at high doses [Ref 13]
**⚠️ FLAG:** Hepatotoxicity risk for cyclazodone is class-inferred from pemoline data. Whether cyclazodone causes idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity at therapeutic/recreational doses is **unknown**. This is a major safety gap.
### Cardiovascular Risks (Class-Based)
- Aminorex caused pulmonary arterial hypertension in human users (Kay et al. 1971 [Ref 5]; Frank et al. 1997 [Ref 6]); this class-specific risk has not been evaluated for cyclazodone
- QTc prolongation observed in the N-methyl-cyclazodone toxicity case (QTc 526 ms) [Ref 13]
- Tachycardia and hypertension are consistent effects of monoamine stimulants
- User reports of HR up to 200 BPM at high doses [Ref 22]
### Exact Toxic Dosage
Unknown. No LD50 data published for cyclazodone in any species. Seed data note ("exact toxic dosage is unknown") confirmed as accurate.
### Exact Therapeutic Index
Not established. No clinical development data available.
### Detection
Standard urine immunoassay will not detect cyclazodone (confirmed in CFSRE case [Ref 13]). LC-HRMS required for confirmation.
---
## Harm Reduction
### Contraindications (Class-Based, No Cyclazodone-Specific Data)
- Hepatic impairment or liver disease (structural analog hepatotoxicity; see Safety section)
- Concurrent MAO inhibitors (risk of hypertensive crisis and serotonin syndrome)
- Concurrent tramadol (see Interactions — designated as lethal in database)
- Concurrent MDMA or other serotonergic agents (see Interactions — dangerous)
- Cardiac arrhythmia or prolonged QTc at baseline (QTc prolongation documented in N-methyl-cyclazodone case [Ref 13])
- Pre-existing psychiatric conditions predisposing to stimulant-induced psychosis
- Concurrent SSRI use: the CFSRE case involved fluoxetine co-administration; the interaction profile is unknown but potentially serious [Ref 13]
### Liver Monitoring
Given the structural similarity to pemoline and the ALT elevation observed in the N-methyl-cyclazodone case, liver function monitoring (ALT, AST) would be prudent for any use, especially prolonged or high-dose use. Pemoline-associated hepatotoxicity was sometimes delayed by months to years [Ref 11].
### Testing
Cyclazodone will return a negative result on standard urine immunoassay. Fentanyl test strips and other common reagent tests have not been validated for cyclazodone. HRMS-based laboratory testing is required for definitive identification.
### Dosing Caution
The 60+ mg "heavy" dose threshold carries explicit hepatotoxicity warnings in community sources [Ref 14]. Given complete absence of safety data, doses exceeding the common range (15–25 mg) should be considered high-risk.
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Published Data
No published controlled studies on cyclazodone tolerance or dependence exist.
### Seed Data
- Buildup: "develops with prolonged and repeated use" — consistent with class (monoamine stimulants)
- Tolerance half-life listed as "5 days" — **this value is unverified and should be flagged**
- Full tolerance reset listed as "1.5 weeks" — unverified, community-inferred
- Cross-tolerances: dopamine, stimulant — consistent with class
### Community Reports (Bluelight [Ref 16])
Users report fatigue and malaise upon discontinuation following daily use, consistent with dopaminergic hypoactivity after stimulant use. No formal withdrawal syndrome characterized.
### Class-Based Inference
Monoamine reuptake inhibitors typically produce tolerance through receptor downregulation and compensatory adaptive mechanisms. Dependence liability has not been formally assessed for cyclazodone. Pemoline was not classified as a controlled substance (Schedule IV) primarily for abuse potential; however, monoaminomimetic stimulants as a class carry dependence risk proportional to their dopaminergic efficacy.
**⚠️ FLAG:** The tolerance half-life of "5 days" in the seed data does not correspond to any published pharmacokinetic measurement. If this represents the time for 50% tolerance decay after cessation, it may be a community estimate extrapolated from class data, but it is unverified and should not be presented as published pharmacokinetic data.
---
## Interactions
### Tramadol (Designated: Lethal in database)
**Mechanism basis:** Tramadol is both a weak opioid agonist and an SNRI (serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor). Tramadol significantly lowers seizure threshold. The first reported death from tramadol involved a combination with multiple serotonergic/noradrenergic drugs (tramadol + venlafaxine + trazodone), producing fatal seizure activity (Ripple et al. 2000 [Ref 20]). Tramadol-induced neurotoxicity in rats involves early elevation of brain serotonin and norepinephrine concentrations (Lagard et al. 2016 [Ref 21]).
**Cyclazodone + tramadol risk:** Cyclazodone's noradrenergic reuptake inhibition would additively increase norepinephrine activity on top of tramadol's own SNRI effect. This combination substantially elevates risk of seizures, serotonin syndrome features, and cardiac arrhythmia. The "lethal" designation in the database is consistent with published tramadol interaction toxicology for noradrenergic/serotonergic combinations.
**⚠️ FLAG:** The lethal classification is class-inferred; no published case reports specifically documenting cyclazodone + tramadol fatality were found.
### MDMA (Designated: Dangerous in database)
**Mechanism basis:** MDMA is a non-selective monoamine releaser with potent serotonergic activity. Combining a dopaminergic/noradrenergic stimulant with MDMA substantially increases monoamine burden, risks hyperthermia, cardiovascular overstimulation, and serotonin toxicity. Aminorex analogs with high serotonergic activity (e.g., 4,4'-DMAR) have been associated with fatalities (Brandt et al. 2014 [Ref 4]).
**⚠️ FLAG:** "Dangerous" classification is class-based. No cyclazodone-specific MDMA interaction data found.
### Alcohol (Designated: Unknown in database)
No published data on cyclazodone + alcohol interaction found. The "unknown" designation in the database is appropriate. Class-based: stimulants generally mask CNS depressant effects of alcohol, increasing risk of dangerous alcohol intake levels and cardiovascular strain.
### Potential Interaction: Fluoxetine/SSRIs
In the CFSRE case, the patient was on fluoxetine concurrently with N-methyl-cyclazodone [Ref 13]. Fluoxetine inhibits CYP2D6 and may inhibit CYP2A6, potentially reducing the N-demethylation of N-methyl-cyclazodone to cyclazodone, or alternatively accumulating cyclazodone. The combined serotonin/norepinephrine burden also increases adverse cardiovascular risk. This interaction is uncharacterized and warrants flagging.
---
## Legal Status
| Jurisdiction | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Gray area / potentially analog | Pemoline (Schedule IV) is the structural analog; Federal Analogue Act (21 U.S.C. § 813) may apply if intended for human consumption |
| United Kingdom | Banned | Covered by Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 [Ref 28] — blanket ban on all psychoactive substances not specifically exempted |
| Germany | Not controlled (legal gray area) | Not scheduled under BtMG (Narcotics Act) or NpSG (NPS Act); may fall under AMG (Medicines Act) if sold for human use |
| Switzerland | Not controlled (legal gray area) | Not listed in controlled schedules A–D |
| Australia | Banned | Blanket psychoactive substance ban |
| New Zealand | Banned | Blanket psychoactive substance ban |
| Canada | Potentially restricted | Analog laws may apply |
| WADA | Prohibited | Listed as prohibited stimulant in competition (Docherty 2008 [Ref 19]) |
**Note:** Aminorex and 4-methylaminorex are UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) Schedule I controlled substances. Cyclazodone is structurally distinct (oxazolidinone vs. oxazoline ring system) and is not currently subject to international scheduling as of the research date (May 2026).
---
## Clinical Trials
No clinical trials for cyclazodone were found on ClinicalTrials.gov. The compound has investigational status (never completed clinical development). No phase I–IV trials have been registered or published.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
**No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief.**
No community feedback items to assess.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Critical Safety-Critical Values — Not Verified Against Published Sources
1. **⚠️ Tolerance half-life "5 days"**: No published pharmacokinetic data supports a 5-day half-life for cyclazodone. The effects last 5–7 hours (community consensus). Pemoline's half-life is 7–12 hours. The "5-day" figure in the tolerance table almost certainly represents an estimate of tolerance decay kinetics (not drug elimination), but even this is unverified. **The generation agent must not present this as an elimination half-life.** Recommend editorial review.
2. **⚠️ LD50 / Toxic dosage**: Unknown. No published animal or human toxicity threshold data for cyclazodone. Exact toxic dosage genuinely unknown.
3. **⚠️ Tramadol: lethal interaction designation**: Class-inferred; no published case report of cyclazodone-specifically + tramadol fatality. Mechanism rationale is strong (additive noradrenergic + seizure risk), but the "lethal" label is not confirmed by substance-specific evidence.
4. **⚠️ Binding affinity data (Ki/EC50)**: No published receptor binding or transporter affinity data for cyclazodone at DAT, NET, SERT, or any other target. All pharmacological classification is class-inferred.
5. **⚠️ TAAR1 mechanism claim**: No published evidence for TAAR1 involvement. Community-sourced speculation only. Do not present as confirmed.
### Data Gaps — No Published Sources
- No published human pharmacokinetic studies (bioavailability, Tmax, elimination half-life, protein binding, volume of distribution)
- No published human controlled dosing or efficacy studies
- No published animal in vivo studies for cyclazodone specifically (rat avoidance data mentioned in secondary sources but no peer-reviewed original study located)
- No published cyclazodone-specific hepatotoxicity case reports
- No published CYP enzyme mapping for cyclazodone itself (only for N-methyl-cyclazodone → cyclazodone step via CYP2A6)
- No published withdrawal characterization
- No published reproductive or teratogenic toxicology
- No published neurotoxicity studies
### Contradictions Between Seed Data and Published Sources
- **Brief lists "Substituted aminorexe"** as chemical class: technically accurate but note cyclazodone has a 4-oxazolidinone (4-oxo ring) vs. aminorex's 2-amino-2-oxazoline system — both are oxazoline/oxazolidinone ring compounds with a phenyl group, but they are not identical ring systems
- **"5-day tolerance half-life"**: As noted above, this almost certainly does not represent elimination half-life; see flag above
### Areas Relying on Structural Analogy Rather Than Substance-Specific Data
The following content areas in any generated article would rely on **class inference** rather than cyclazodone-specific evidence:
- Mechanism of action (DAT/NET reuptake inhibition: from pemoline/aminorex class)
- Hepatotoxicity risk (from pemoline)
- Pulmonary hypertension class risk (from aminorex — distant structural analog)
- TAAR1 speculation (from amphetamine class; no cyclazodone-specific evidence)
- Tolerance/dependence profile (from monoamine stimulant class)
- MDMA interaction risk (from combined stimulant class data)
- Tramadol interaction mechanism (from tramadol + serotonergic/noradrenergic drug interactions)
### One Published Peer-Reviewed Case Report Involving Cyclazodone (as Metabolite)
The CFSRE 2022 presentation (presented at NACCT 2022) is the only published clinical case involving cyclazodone (confirmed as urinary metabolite of N-methyl-cyclazodone) [Ref 13]. This is a conference presentation/abstract, not a full peer-reviewed journal article. A full manuscript may exist but was not located via PubMed or Crossref searches as of May 2026.
### One Published Toxicokinetic Study
Gampfer et al. 2026 [Ref 18] in *Metabolites* (DOI: 10.3390/metabo16050291) is a peer-reviewed primary study directly characterizing N-methyl-cyclazodone's toxicokinetics, confirming cyclazodone as the CYP2A6 N-demethylation product. This is the highest-quality source directly relevant to cyclazodone's metabolic role.