generation run 2026-05-07
61 min completedmodel pipeline-v5plan not recordedrun/8333cdf5…Selection
Verification
- record
- seen / partial
- working
The model's own caveats
- contradictory_sources
- safety_data_note
Reproduce
- inputs
- 50 source keys (listed under Sources)
- plan
- not recorded — template version, prompt hash and git SHA are written from 2026-09 onward
- model
- pipeline-v5
- streams
- none — agent transcripts are persisted from 2026-09 onward
25 searches — query, source, results, what was kept and why
| # | source | query | seen | kept | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PubMed | cannabidiol pharmacology receptor binding mechanism of action | 12 | 4 | Most relevant to pharmacology/receptor binding. Others were too specific to cancer/delivery. |
| 2 | PubMed | cannabidiol pharmacokinetics bioavailability human | 10 | 5 | Key PK papers: comparative PK of formulations, EFSA safety update 2026, epilepsy PK review, lymphatic transport pig model |
| 3 | OpenAlex | cannabidiol CBD pharmacology mechanism | 10 | 4 | Landmark papers on CBD pharmacology, receptor targets, and PK |
| 4 | PubChem | cannabidiol | 1 | 1 | Confirms chemical identity of CBD |
| 5 | PubMed | cannabidiol drug interaction CYP2C19 CYP3A4 clobazam antiepileptic | 4 | 4 | Essential drug interaction papers for interactions section |
| 6 | PubMed · absence | cannabidiol discovery history isolation Adams mechoulam 1940 1963 | 0 | 0 | Will use web search for historical context |
| 7 | PubMed | cannabidiol tolerance dependence withdrawal abuse potential | 5 | 2 | Key tolerance/dependence papers for CBD specifically |
| 8 | PubMed | cannabidiol safety toxicity liver adverse effects hepatotoxicity | 8 | 6 | Key safety papers for toxicity section |
| 9 | OpenAlex | cannabidiol isolation structure Adams Mechoulam history discovery | 8 | 2 | Historical context for CBD discovery and phytocannabinoid chemistry |
| 10 | OpenAlex | cannabidiol anxiety antipsychotic clinical trial human | 8 | 1 | Major systematic review of cannabinoid clinical evidence |
| 11 | ClinicalTrials.gov | cannabidiol CBD treatment | 12 | 5 | Most clinically relevant trials across different indications |
| 12 | OpenAlex | cannabidiol anti-inflammatory neuroprotective antioxidant mechanisms | 8 | 4 | Important mechanistic and historical review papers |
| 13 | PubMed | cannabidiol 5-HT1A serotonin receptor binding affinity Ki EC50 | 3 | 3 | Quantitative binding data for 5-HT1A pharmacology |
| 14 | PubMed | cannabidiol nausea emesis antiemetic serotonin 5-HT | 5 | 2 | Evidence for CBD nausea suppression mechanism via 5-HT1A |
| 15 | PubMed | cannabidiol Devinsky Dravet syndrome randomized controlled trial 2017 | 1 | 1 | Pivotal Phase 3 RCT leading to FDA approval |
| 16 | WebSearch | cannabidiol history discovery isolation Roger Adams 1940 Mechoulam 1963 structure | 10 | 1 | Historical context for CBD discovery narrative |
| 17 | WebSearch | cannabidiol legal status UK EU Canada Australia DEA Schedule V US 2024 2025 | 10 | 0 | Legal status data for multiple jurisdictions |
| 18 | WebSearch | cannabidiol Australia TGA approved legal status CBD scheduling 2024 | 10 | 0 | Australian regulatory information |
| 19 | PubMed | cannabidiol adverse effects diarrhea somnolence appetite clinical Epidiolex trials | 6 | 3 | Real-world adverse effect profile from clinical trials |
| 20 | PubMed | cannabidiol opioid substance use disorder addiction treatment | 5 | 1 | Most current and high-quality evidence for CBD in substance use disorders |
| 21 | PubMed | cannabidiol autism spectrum disorder clinical trial children | 5 | 2 | Evidence for CBD in ASD - emerging indication |
| 22 | PubMed | cannabidiol Zuardi historical review first human trials | 1 | 1 | Key historical review from the group that conducted first human CBD studies |
| 23 | PubChem | CBD CID 644019 chemical properties | 1 | 1 | Chemical identity verification against seed data - no contradictions found |
| 24 | PubMed | Devinsky Patel Cross GWPCARE3 cannabidiol Lennox-Gastaut drop seizures NEJM 2018 | 1 | 1 | Companion trial to 2017 Dravet syndrome paper; led to FDA approval for LGS |
| 25 | Multiple | Cross-referencing seed data dose ranges against EFSA safety statement and Epidiolex clinical dosing | 3 | 0 | Safety-critical cross-reference flagged in research output |
188 claims by section — every cited sentence, checked against its source
safety70 · 3 ok
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
In iPSC-derived hepatocytes, the transcriptomic point-of-departure is 0.106 µM, with impairment of CYP activity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and lipid accumulation at 0.1–3 µM.partially supported
Transcriptomic analysis of hemp cannabinoids in human iPSC-derived hepatocytes. CBG has lowest transcriptional activity among cannabinoids tested (CBN > CBD > CBC > CBG). All cannabinoids impaired liver metabolism and caused oxidative stress. Hemp extract adverse effects largely driven by CBD. j.tox.2024.153885
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Additive cardiovascular effects with sympathomimetic agents represent a theoretical concernsupported
Cardiac toxicity via additive hypertension and tachycardia with sympathomimetics. bcp.13710
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Non-psychoactive cannabinoids do not produce intoxicating, cognitive, or rewarding properties in humanssupported
Non-psychoactive cannabinoids do not produce intoxicating, cognitive or rewarding properties in humans. Delta-9-THC has moderate reinforcing effects with a 2-6 day withdrawal syndrome. fpsyt.2024.1322434
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in safety — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
pharmacology46 · 1 ok
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
CBD subsequently desensitizes TRPV1 to capsaicin challenge, and additionally activates and desensitizes TRPV2, TRPA1, and TRPM8partially supported
CBD, CBG, CBGV and THCV stimulated and desensitized human TRPV1. CBC, CBD and CBN were potent rat TRPA1 agonists. j.1476-5381.2010.01166.x
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — not_supportednot supportedworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
clinical-evidence20 · 0 ok
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in clinical-evidence — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
history12 · 0 ok
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in history — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
neuroscience10 · 0 ok
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in neuroscience — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
summary10 · 0 ok
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in summary — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
comparative-pharmacology6 · 1 ok
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
THC is a cb1-receptor partial-agonist producing euphoria, perceptual distortion, and cognitive impairment; CBD is a CB1 negative allosteric modulator producing none of these effectspartially supported
Delta9-THC is a CB1 and CB2 receptor partial agonist. Responses strongly influenced by receptor expression level, signalling efficiency, and ongoing endocannabinoid release. sj.bjp.0707442
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in comparative-pharmacology — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
pharmacokinetic-detail6 · 0 ok
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →
Claim in pharmacokinetic-detail — inconclusiveinconclusiveworking →