4-HO-DET
4-hydroxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 10–15 mg | 10–15 mg | low |
| Common | 15–25 mg | 15–25 mg | low |
| Strong | 25–35 mg | 25–35 mg | low |
| Heavy | 35+ mg | 35+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Shulgin's TiHKAL documents oral doses of 10–25 mg across bioassays. Existing database brief lists threshold 5 mg, light 10–15 mg, common 20–30 mg, strong 30–45 mg, heavy 45+ mg. Doses above 25 mg exceed all published data (Shulgin's maximum). Proposed ranges use Shulgin's 10–25 mg as the core validated window, with community-sourced extensions above 25 mg conservatively narrowed from the database brief values. The threshold of 5 mg is community-reported. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin's TiHKAL documents oral doses of 10–25 mg across bioassays. Existing database brief lists threshold 5 mg, light 10–15 mg, common 20–30 mg, strong 30–45 mg, heavy 45+ mg. Doses above 25 mg exceed all published data (Shulgin's maximum). Proposed ranges use Shulgin's 10–25 mg as the core validated window, with community-sourced extensions above 25 mg conservatively narrowed from the database brief values. The threshold of 5 mg is community-reported. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 20–45 minutes | 20–45 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | Shulgin's TiHKAL reports onset within 30–45 minutes. Existing database lists 20–40 minutes. The free phenol form may produce slightly faster onset than psilocybin prodrug. Range encompasses both sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin's TiHKAL reports onset within 30–45 minutes. Existing database lists 20–40 minutes. The free phenol form may produce slightly faster onset than psilocybin prodrug. Range encompasses both sources. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 1.5–2 hours | 1.5–2 hours | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from psilocin offset profile. No substance-specific published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from psilocin offset profile. No substance-specific published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 4–6 hours | 4–6 hours | medium |
| Editorial | Shulgin's TiHKAL reports 4–6 hours total duration. Existing database lists 5–7 hours. Proposed range uses TiHKAL's published values as the primary anchor; Leuner specifically valued the compound's shorter duration. The 1-hour discrepancy with database values may reflect higher community doses or variant salt forms. | ||
ReasoningReasoningShulgin's TiHKAL reports 4–6 hours total duration. Existing database lists 5–7 hours. Proposed range uses TiHKAL's published values as the primary anchor; Leuner specifically valued the compound's shorter duration. The 1-hour discrepancy with database values may reflect higher community doses or variant salt forms. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 20–45 minutes | 20–45 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from psilocin come-up profile. No substance-specific data published. Existing database values carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from psilocin come-up profile. No substance-specific data published. Existing database values carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from psilocin peak duration and existing database values. No substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from psilocin peak duration and existing database values. No substance-specific data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–6 hours | 2–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from psilocin aftereffect profile and existing database values. Leuner noted minimal aftereffects at clinical doses. No substance-specific published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from psilocin aftereffect profile and existing database values. Leuner noted minimal aftereffects at clinical doses. No substance-specific published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | low | low | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular | cardiovascular | low |
| Editorial | Classified as low (downgraded from negligible): psilocin/psilocybin class evidence suggests negligible acute toxicity, but 4-HO-DET has zero substance-specific toxicological data. Leuner's 160+ clinical sessions and Shulgin's bioassays reported no serious adverse events, but these are uncontrolled observations insufficient for confident assessment. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClassified as low (downgraded from negligible): psilocin/psilocybin class evidence suggests negligible acute toxicity, but 4-HO-DET has zero substance-specific toxicological data. Leuner's 160+ clinical sessions and Shulgin's bioassays reported no serious adverse events, but these are uncontrolled observations insufficient for confident assessment. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | Dependence profile inferred from psilocin and classical psychedelic class evidence (Nichols 2018, de la Fuente Revenga 2022). No substance-specific data, but the class-level evidence for negligible dependence liability is strong and consistent across all characterized 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics. | ||
ReasoningReasoningDependence profile inferred from psilocin and classical psychedelic class evidence (Nichols 2018, de la Fuente Revenga 2022). No substance-specific data, but the class-level evidence for negligible dependence liability is strong and consistent across all characterized 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome documented for any classical psychedelic. Class evidence strongly supports absence of physical withdrawal. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome documented for any classical psychedelic. Class evidence strongly supports absence of physical withdrawal. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | medium |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | psilocybin, psilocin, LSD, mescaline, DMT, 4-AcO-DMT, 4-HO-MET, 4-AcO-DET | psilocybin, psilocin, LSD, mescaline, DMT, 4-AcO-DMT, 4-HO-MET, 4-AcO-DET | medium |
| Editorial | Tolerance mechanism inferred from class evidence (de la Fuente Revenga 2022, Buckholtz 1990). The 3-day half-life and 7-day full reset are consistent with existing database values and supported by the well-characterized 5-HT2A downregulation mechanism common to all classical psychedelics. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance mechanism inferred from class evidence (de la Fuente Revenga 2022, Buckholtz 1990). The 3-day half-life and 7-day full reset are consistent with existing database values and supported by the well-characterized 5-HT2A downregulation mechanism common to all classical psychedelics. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for all 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET, but the mechanism applies universally to this pharmacological class. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for all 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET, but the mechanism applies universally to this pharmacological class. | |||
| psychiatric bipolar disordertrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication supported by clinical psychedelic literature. The additional lithium interaction risk compounds the danger for medicated bipolar patients. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication supported by clinical psychedelic literature. The additional lithium interaction risk compounds the danger for medicated bipolar patients. | |||
| cardiovascular cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication. Sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects are documented across the psychedelic tryptamine class. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication. Sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects are documented across the psychedelic tryptamine class. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| other concurrent MAOI usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Mechanistically supported by Eckernäs et al. (2023) showing MAO-A inhibition shifts tryptamine metabolism. Class-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelics. | ||
ReasoningReasoningMechanistically supported by Eckernäs et al. (2023) showing MAO-A inhibition shifts tryptamine metabolism. Class-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelics. | |||
| other concurrent tramadol usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Mechanistically supported by Baldo 2018 (tramadol SERT inhibition) and Park et al. 2014 (FDA serotonin syndrome warning). No case report specific to 4-HO-DET, but pharmacological mechanism is clear. | ||
ReasoningReasoningMechanistically supported by Baldo 2018 (tramadol SERT inhibition) and Park et al. 2014 (FDA serotonin syndrome warning). No case report specific to 4-HO-DET, but pharmacological mechanism is clear. | |||
| other concurrent lithium usetrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | Known dangerous combination for classical psychedelics as a class. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningKnown dangerous combination for classical psychedelics as a class. No substance-specific data for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancytrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | Standard class contraindication applied to all psychoactive substances without reproductive safety data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningStandard class contraindication applied to all psychoactive substances without reproductive safety data. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| Come uptrace | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.30) | 1200–2700 sec(i=0.30) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| Peaktrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=1.00) | 3600–7200 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| Plateautrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.50) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.20) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.05) | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline reconstructed from Shulgin's TiHKAL report of 4\u20136 hours total duration with onset at 30\u201345 minutes, combined with existing database duration data (5\u20137 hours total). Phase breakdown inferred from psilocin temporal profile, adjusted for 4-HO-DET's direct bioavailability (no prodrug conversion). No controlled pharmacokinetic timing data exist for 4-HO-DET. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (~5 mg oral), effects are subtle and easily dismissed: mild mood elevation, slight visual brightening, faint enhancement of color saturation, and a gentle sense of heightened awareness. Time perception may shift marginally. These doses do not produce overt hallucinatory phenomena. Physically, mild pupil dilation and slight restlessness may occur. Functional impairment is minimal. Sleep may be mildly delayed for 2–3 hours after ingestion.
No published threshold data for 4-HO-DET. The 5 mg value is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects inferred from psilocin threshold experience and 4-HO tryptamine class reports.
ReasoningReasoning
No published threshold data for 4-HO-DET. The 5 mg value is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects inferred from psilocin threshold experience and 4-HO tryptamine class reports.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At light doses (10–15 mg oral), the psychedelic character becomes apparent: surfaces may shimmer or breathe subtly, colors appear more vivid, and music appreciation deepens. Thought connectivity increases, producing novel associations and mild conceptual shifts. Emotional sensitivity heightens — interactions and environments take on greater significance. Time distortion becomes noticeable. Physical effects include pupil dilation, mild nausea in some individuals, and occasional yawning. Body load is generally mild at this range. The experience is manageable and does not produce overwhelming perceptual changes. Total duration at this range is approximately 4–5 hours. Sleep is typically possible within 1–2 hours of resolution.
Shulgin's TiHKAL reports effects at 15 mg (indolol form) including altered time perception and visual effects. The 10–15 mg range is within Shulgin's documented experience and consistent with existing database light tier values.
ReasoningReasoning
Shulgin's TiHKAL reports effects at 15 mg (indolol form) including altered time perception and visual effects. The 10–15 mg range is within Shulgin's documented experience and consistent with existing database light tier values.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At common doses (15–25 mg oral), the full psychedelic experience manifests: pronounced visual drifting and morphing of surfaces, geometric patterning in peripheral vision and with eyes closed, color enhancement, and depth perception alterations. Thought loops and heightened pattern recognition emerge. Emotional responses intensify significantly — personal insight and meaningful ideation are characteristic. Time distortion is prominent. Physically, nausea or stomach discomfort may occur during onset. Jaw tension, body tremors, and temperature dysregulation become possible. Increased urination is reported. Pupil dilation is marked. Functional impairment is significant at this range. The experience demands 5–6 hours of committed time, and residual effects may persist for several additional hours.
Shulgin's TiHKAL documents experiences at 15–25 mg covering visual effects, emotional shifts, and physical side effects (stomach upset, tremors, jaw tension at 20–25 mg). The common range aligns with Shulgin's most documented dose window.
ReasoningReasoning
Shulgin's TiHKAL documents experiences at 15–25 mg covering visual effects, emotional shifts, and physical side effects (stomach upset, tremors, jaw tension at 20–25 mg). The common range aligns with Shulgin's most documented dose window.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At strong doses (25–35 mg oral), perceptual effects become immersive: external hallucinations may overlay the visual field, internal hallucinations with eyes closed become vivid and complex, and visual tracers follow moving objects. Conceptual thinking deepens substantially, with potential for profound personal insight or challenging thought loops. Emotional experiences may reach overwhelming intensity — both euphoric and dysphoric outcomes are possible. Ego dissolution may begin to emerge. Body load increases notably: jaw tension, muscle tension, nausea, and temperature fluctuations are common. Spontaneous bodily sensations intensify. Motor control may be noticeably impaired. This dose range exceeds Shulgin's documented maximum of 25 mg and is not validated by any published source. Duration may extend toward 6–7 hours.
Doses above 25 mg exceed Shulgin's published experience range. The 25–35 mg strong tier is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects extrapolated from psilocin strong-dose profiles and community 4-HO tryptamine reports. Not validated by published data.
ReasoningReasoning
Doses above 25 mg exceed Shulgin's published experience range. The 25–35 mg strong tier is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects extrapolated from psilocin strong-dose profiles and community 4-HO tryptamine reports. Not validated by published data.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At heavy doses (35+ mg oral), the experience is dominated by intense and potentially overwhelming perceptual and cognitive effects: complete visual field transformation, profound ego dissolution, loss of normal time awareness, and deeply emotionally charged states. The distinction between internal and external experience may blur. Thought processes become highly non-linear, with potential for both transcendent and severely distressing experiences. Physical effects are pronounced: significant nausea, muscle tension, jaw clenching, tremors, and temperature dysregulation. Motor coordination is substantially impaired. Abnormal heartbeat sensations may occur. This dose range is entirely unvalidated by published sources. The risk of adverse psychological outcomes increases substantially. Duration may extend to 7+ hours. Sleep is impossible during the experience.
Doses above 35 mg have no published validation. The heavy tier is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects inferred from high-dose psilocin profiles. All characterizations are speculative and require editorial review.
ReasoningReasoning
Doses above 35 mg have no published validation. The heavy tier is from the existing database brief (community-sourced). Effects inferred from high-dose psilocin profiles. All characterizations are speculative and require editorial review.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]weakTiHKAL: Tryptamines I Have Known And Loved - Entry #16: 4-HO-DETShulgin A, Shulgin A · 1997linkno claims checked
- [2]weak
- [3]moderateLower-Dose Psycholytic Therapy - A Neglected ApproachPassie T, Guss J, Krähenmann R · 2022 · Frontiers in Psychiatrydoi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1020505pubmed 365321967 claims checked1 verified1 partial4 inconclusive1 not supported
- [4]strongChemistry and Structure-Activity Relationships of Psychedelics.Nichols DE · 2018 · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- [5]moderateDiscriminative Stimulus Effects of Substituted Tryptamines in RatsGatch MB, Hoch A, Carbonaro TM · 2021 · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
- [6]moderateDifferential contributions of serotonin receptors to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens in miceHalberstadt AL, Koedood L, Powell SB, Geyer MA · 2011 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
- [7]moderateTolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Micede la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [8]moderateThe History of Psychedelics in PsychiatryNichols DE, Walter H · 2021 · Pharmacopsychiatry
- [9]strongFurther Studies on Oxygenated Tryptamines with LSD-Like Activity Incorporating a Chiral Pyrrolidine MoietyGerasimov M, Marona-Lewicka D, Kurrasch-Orbaugh DM, Qandil AM, Nichols DE · 1999 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 105142963 claims checked3 verified
- [10]moderate
- [11]weak
- [12]strongReceptor Binding Profiles for Tryptamine Psychedelics and Effects of 4-Propionoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine in MiceGlatfelter GC, Naeem M, Pham DNK, Golen JA, Chadeayne AR, Manke DR, Baumann MH · 2023 · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
- [13]moderateDetermination of psilocin and 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid in plasma by HPLC-ECD and pharmacokinetic profiles of oral and intravenous psilocybin in manHasler F, Bourquin D, Brenneisen R, Bär T, Vollenweider FX · 1997 · Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiaepubmed 92047762 claims checked2 verified
- [14]strongPharmacokinetics of Psilocybin: A Systematic ReviewMeshkat S, Al-Shamali H, Perivolaris A, et al. · 2025 · Pharmaceutics
- [15]strongN,N-Dimethyltryptamine Forms Oxygenated Metabolites via CYP2D6 - An In Vitro InvestigationEckernäs E, Macan-Schönleben A, Andresen-Bergström M, Birgersson S, Hoffmann KJ, Ashton M · 2023 · Xenobiotica
- [16]strong5-HT2A Receptor-Stimulated Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis in the Stimulus Effects of HallucinogensRabin RA, Regina M, Doat M, Winter JC · 2002 · Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviorpubmed 119007662 claims checked2 verified
- [17]moderateClassic Psychedelic Drugs: Update on Biological MechanismsVollenweider FX, Smallridge JW · 2022 · Pharmacopsychiatry
- [18]moderateMechanisms and Molecular Targets Surrounding the Potential Therapeutic Effects of PsychedelicsJaster AM, González-Maeso J · 2023 · Molecular Psychiatry
- [19]strongRole of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, 5-HT1A and TAAR1 Receptors in the Head Twitch Response Induced by 5-HTP and PsilocybinShahar O, Botvinnik A, Esh-Zuntz N, Brownstien M, Wolf R · 2022 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- [20]strongIn Vitro Structure-Activity Relationship of 30 Psychedelic NPS by β-Arrestin 2 Recruitment to 5-HT2A ReceptorPottie E, Cannaert A, Stove CP · 2020 · Archives of Toxicology
- [21]moderateHallucinogen persisting perception disorder and the serotonergic system: a comprehensive review including new MDMA-related clinical casesLitjens RP, Brunt TM, Alderliefste GJ, Westerink RH · 2014 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
- [22]weakHallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder After Psilocybin Consumption: A Case StudyEspiard ML, Lecardeur L, Abadie P, Halbecq I, Dollfus S · 2005 · European Psychiatrypubmed 159636991 claim checked1 verified
- [23]moderateLysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) administration selectively downregulates serotonin2 receptors in rat brainBuckholtz NS, Zhou DF, Freedman DX, Potter WZ · 1990 · Neuropsychopharmacologypubmed 19692702 claims checked2 verified
- [24]moderateOpioid analgesic drugs and serotonin toxicity (syndrome): mechanisms, animal models, and links to clinical effectsBaldo BA · 2018 · Archives of Toxicology
- [25]weakSerotonin syndrome: is it a reason to avoid the use of tramadol with antidepressants?Park SH, Wackernah RC, Stimmel GL · 2014 · Journal of Pharmacy Practice
- [26]strongDrug-drug interactions involving classic psychedelics: A systematic reviewHalman A, Kong G, Sarris J, Perkins D · 2024 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary6 claims2verified1partial3inconclusive
inconclusiveThe compound saw its most significant clinical application under Hanscarl Leuner, who conducted more than 160 psycholytic therapy sessions with CZ-74 in 1960s Germany, valuing its shorter duration relative to LSD for within-session completion[3]model confidence 75%
The abstract confirms Leuner's psycholytic therapy work in Germany using tryptamines, covering the right topic. However, the specific '160 sessions' figure and the rationale about preferring CZ-74 for its shorter duration are not confirmed in the abstract; these details may be in the full paper.
Comprehensive review of psycholytic therapy 1949-1970s, led by Hanscarl Leuner in Germany. Used at 30 European clinical centers. Various substances including tryptamines employed in serial lower-dose sessions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verified4-HO-DET is presumed to act primarily through 5-HT₂A receptor agonism based on the shared 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore with psilocin[4]model confidence 88%
The SAR review covers tryptamines with 5-HT2A as the principal receptor target, directly supporting the claim that the 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore mediates 5-HT2A agonism.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedIn vivo, the compound fully substitutes for the selective 5-HT₂A agonist DOM in rat drug-discrimination assays, confirming hallucinogen-like activity[5]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly states that 4-OH-DET fully substituted for DOM in drug-discrimination assays in rats, confirming hallucinogen-like activity.
4-OH-DET and related tryptamines fully substituted for DOM discriminative stimulus in rats.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe resulting phenomenology — visual distortions, heightened emotional responsiveness, altered time perception, and conceptual thought shifts — is consistent with the classical serotonergic psychedelic profile, modulated strongly by set and setting.[6]model confidence 70%
The abstract addresses receptor pharmacology in mice (5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C mediating behavioral effects), not human phenomenology or set-and-setting modulation. While it establishes mechanistic groundwork, the specific phenomenological claims and set/setting modulation are not addressed by this abstract.
Psilocin (4-HO-DMT) acts at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2C receptors; HTR mediated by 5-HT2A; locomotor effects by 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialAs a 5-HT₂A agonist, tolerance develops rapidly through receptor downregulation in the frontal cortex, with full reset occurring over approximately 7 days[7]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation, but does not mention the frontal cortex specifically or the '7 days' reset timeline. These are specific factual assertions not confirmed in the abstract.
Repeated DOI administration induces progressive HTR tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation. Cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD. Tolerance is 5-HT2AR-mediated and independent of beta-arrestin-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveNo physical dependence or compulsive use pattern has been documented for classical psychedelics as a class[4]model confidence 70%
The abstract is an SAR review focused on structural determinants of 5-HT2A binding. It does not address addiction liability, physical dependence, or compulsive use patterns.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
history3 claims1partial2inconclusive
inconclusiveThis work formed part of Sandoz's broader program of systematic tryptamine modification following Hofmann's isolation of psilocybin from Psilocybe mexicana in 1958, itself a continuation of the research trajectory initiated by the discovery of LSD in 1943. 4-HO-DET was among the earliest synthetic psychedelic tryptamines produced, predating the contemporary research chemical era by decades.[8]model confidence 65%
The abstract covers LSD's 1943 discovery and early history of psychedelics, but does not specifically confirm Hofmann's 1958 psilocybin isolation, Sandoz's tryptamine modification program, or 4-HO-DET's early development. These details may be in the full paper.
History of psychedelics from early 20th century mescaline/peyote work through LSD discovery in 1943 and evolution toward psychotherapy adjunct role.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveHanscarl Leuner, the leading proponent of psycholytic psychotherapy in Europe, conducted more than 160 clinical sessions using CZ-74 at his clinic in Germany[3]model confidence 70%
The abstract confirms Leuner's leading role in psycholytic therapy in Germany and the use of tryptamines in sessions, but the specific '160 sessions' figure is not in the abstract.
Comprehensive review of psycholytic therapy 1949-1970s, led by Hanscarl Leuner in Germany. Various substances including tryptamines employed in serial lower-dose sessions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialPsycholytic therapy at that time was practiced across approximately 30 European clinical centers by more than 100 outpatient psychotherapists[3]model confidence 80%
The '30 European clinical centers' figure is directly confirmed in the abstract. The 'more than 100 outpatient psychotherapists' figure is not mentioned in the abstract.
Used at 30 European clinical centers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
chemistry3 claims2verified1inconclusive
verifiedIt shares the 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore — the structural motif responsible for 5-HT₂A agonism — with psilocin (4-HO-DMT), 4-HO-MET, and other members of the 4-HO-xT series. 4-HO-DET is the direct N,N-diethyl homolog of psilocin, differing only in the substitution of two ethyl groups for two methyl groups on the terminal amine nitrogen of the tryptamine side chain.[4]model confidence 88%
The SAR review covers tryptamine structural relationships and 5-HT2A agonism, supporting the claim about shared pharmacophore and structural relationships within the 4-HO-xT series.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe compound's prodrug relationship to ethocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine, CEY-19) parallels that of psilocin to psilocybin: the phosphate ester requires enzymatic dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase to yield the active 4-hydroxy form.[4]model confidence 60%
The abstract does not address prodrug relationships, phosphate esters, or enzymatic dephosphorylation. These specific chemical details are not covered in the abstract summary.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedConformationally constrained analogs — such as the pyrrolidine-containing 4-hydroxytryptamines studied by Gerasimov et al. — introduce chirality, but the flexible diethylamine side chain of 4-HO-DET does not.[9]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms the study of rigid/conformationally constrained 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs compared to psilocin, supporting the claim about pyrrolidine analogs introducing chirality.
Rigid 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs compared to psilocin. LSD-DOI discrimination used to assess hallucinogen-like activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacology11 claims9verified2inconclusive
verifiedThe 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore — shared with psilocin, 4-HO-MET, and other psychedelic tryptamines — is the structural determinant of 5-HT₂A binding and hallucinogenic activity[4]model confidence 90%
This SAR review explicitly covers 4-hydroxy substitution effects on activity in tryptamines with 5-HT2A as the principal receptor target, directly supporting the claim.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore — shared with psilocin, 4-HO-MET, and other psychedelic tryptamines — is the structural determinant of 5-HT₂A binding and hallucinogenic activity[9]model confidence 93%
The abstract directly tests rigid 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs at 5-HT2A receptors and assesses hallucinogen-like activity, confirming the 4-hydroxyindole scaffold as the determinant.
Radioligand competition at 5-HT2A using [125I]DOI and [3H]MDL100907. Rigid 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs compared to psilocin. LSD-DOI discrimination used to assess hallucinogen-like activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveUnlike its prodrug ethocybin (CEY-19), 4-HO-DET bears a free phenolic hydroxyl and is directly active without requiring enzymatic dephosphorylation.[4]model confidence 65%
The abstract covers SAR for tryptamines but does not address prodrug relationships, phosphate esters, or enzymatic dephosphorylation. These details may be in the full text.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe most direct pharmacological evidence comes from Gatch, Hoch, and Carbonaro (2021), who demonstrated that 4-HO-DET fully substitutes for the selective 5-HT₂A agonist DOM in drug-discrimination assays in male Sprague-Dawley rats[5]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms that 4-OH-DET fully substituted for the DOM discriminative stimulus in rats, exactly matching the claim.
4-OH-DET and related tryptamines fully substituted for DOM discriminative stimulus in rats.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHalberstadt et al. (2011) established that psilocin acts as an agonist at 5-HT₁A, 5-HT₂A, and 5-HT₂C receptors in mice, with each receptor mediating distinct behavioral components: 5-HT₂A drives the head twitch response (the rodent marker of hallucinogenic activity), 5-HT₁A mediates locomotor suppression, and 5-HT₂C modulates locomotor path linearity[6]model confidence 88%
The abstract confirms psilocin acting at all three receptor subtypes with HTR mediated by 5-HT2A and locomotor effects by 5-HT1A. The 5-HT2C path linearity detail is not in the abstract but the primary claims are confirmed.
Psilocin (4-HO-DMT) acts at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2C receptors; HTR mediated by 5-HT2A; locomotor effects by 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveAt higher doses, 5-HT₁A-mediated effects — hypothermia and hypolocomotion — may dominate, as demonstrated across tryptamine psychedelics by Glatfelter et al. (2023).[12]model confidence 65%
The abstract confirms 5-HT1A binding for these tryptamines, but does not address hypothermia, hypolocomotion, or dose-dependent dominance of 5-HT1A effects. These specific behavioral outcomes may be in the full text.
All target multiple serotonin receptors including 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe parent compound N,N-diethyltryptamine (DET, lacking the 4-hydroxyl) produces concentration-dependent stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT₂A receptors in PC12-5-HT₂A cells, establishing the functional activity of the N,N-diethyl scaffold at this receptor[16]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly states that DET causes concentration-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT2A in PC12 cells, matching the claim precisely.
DET causes concentration-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT2A in PC12 cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe addition of the 4-hydroxyl group is expected to increase 5-HT₂A affinity and potency based on established structure-activity relationships for the tryptamine series.[4]model confidence 87%
The SAR review covers 4-hydroxy substitution effects on activity in tryptamines and 5-HT2A binding, directly supporting this claim about potency enhancement via 4-hydroxylation.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPsilocin pharmacokinetic data from Hasler et al. (1997) and Meshkat et al. (2025)[13]model confidence 95%
The abstract is clearly a psilocin pharmacokinetics study reporting bioavailability, peak plasma levels, and metabolites, confirming it as a valid source for psilocin PK data.
Oral psilocybin 10-20mg: peak psilocin 8.2±2.8 ng/mL at 105±37 min. Absolute bioavailability 52.7±20%. Major metabolite 4-HIAA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPsilocin pharmacokinetic data from Hasler et al. (1997) and Meshkat et al. (2025)[14]model confidence 95%
The abstract is a systematic review of psilocin pharmacokinetics across 14 studies, confirming it as a valid source for psilocin PK data.
Systematic review of 14 studies. Psilocin Tmax 1.8-4h; bioavailability 52.7±20%; Vd 277-1016L; metabolism primarily CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 with secondary MAO-A; elimination half-life 1.5-4h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCYP2D6 involvement in indole tryptamine metabolism is further supported by Eckernäs et al. (2023), who demonstrated CYP2D6-mediated formation of oxygenated metabolites from DMT.[15]model confidence 96%
The abstract directly states DMT is rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 via hydroxylation (oxygenated metabolites) on the indole core, exactly matching the claim.
DMT rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 via hydroxylation on the indole core.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
receptor pharmacology7 claims7verified
verifiedDOM drug-discrimination (in vivo). Gatch, Hoch, and Carbonaro (2021) tested 4-HO-DET directly in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate DOM (2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine, a selective 5-HT₂A agonist) from saline. 4-HO-DET fully substituted for the DOM discriminative stimulus, indicating functional 5-HT₂A agonism sufficient to produce hallucinogen-like interoceptive effects in vivo[5]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms that 4-OH-DET fully substituted for DOM in drug discrimination assays in rats, matching the claim precisely.
4-OH-DET and related tryptamines fully substituted for DOM discriminative stimulus in rats.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedMulti-receptor binding screen. Glatfelter et al. (2023) examined receptor binding profiles across a matrix of 4-substituted tryptamines with varied N,N-dialkyl groups, explicitly including the N,N-diethyl (4-HO-DET) variant[12]model confidence 98%
The abstract explicitly states the diethyl variant was included in the binding screen of 4-substituted tryptamines with varied N,N-dialkyl groups.
Examined 4-hydroxy, 4-acetoxy, 4-propionoxy variants with N,N-dialkyl (dimethyl, methyl-ethyl, diethyl, methyl-propyl, ethyl-propyl, diisopropyl, methyl-allyl, diallyl) substitutions in binding screen. Diethyl variant included.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedDET functional activity. Rabin et al. (2002) demonstrated that the parent compound N,N-diethyltryptamine (DET) stimulates phosphoinositide hydrolysis through 5-HT₂A receptors in PC12-5-HT₂A cells in a concentration-dependent manner[16]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms DET causes concentration-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT2A in PC12 cells.
DET causes concentration-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT2A in PC12 cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPsilocin multi-receptor pharmacology. Halberstadt et al. (2011) demonstrated that psilocin — differing from 4-HO-DET only in N,N-dimethyl versus N,N-diethyl substitution — produces receptor-specific behavioral effects in mice: 5-HT₂A mediates the head twitch response, 5-HT₁A mediates locomotor suppression, and 5-HT₂C modulates path linearity[6]model confidence 88%
The abstract confirms psilocin acts at all three receptor subtypes with HTR mediated by 5-HT2A and locomotor effects by 5-HT1A. 5-HT2C path linearity is not specified in the abstract but the main findings are confirmed.
Psilocin (4-HO-DMT) acts at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2C receptors; HTR mediated by 5-HT2A; locomotor effects by 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedShahar et al. (2022) further confirmed that 5-HT₁A agonism inhibits 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch response, indicating functional antagonism between these receptor systems.[19]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms an inhibitory effect of 5-HT1AR agonism on HTR, matching the claim precisely.
Inhibitory effect of 5-HT1AR agonism on HTR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedGerasimov et al. (1999) established that conformationally constrained pyrrolidine analogs of psilocin bind 5-HT₂A with affinity comparable to psilocin itself and produce LSD-like discriminative stimulus effects, confirming that the 4-hydroxyindole scaffold is the primary determinant of hallucinogenic activity independent of amine side-chain flexibility[9]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms rigid 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs were tested at 5-HT2A via radioligand competition and assessed for hallucinogen-like activity via LSD-DOI discrimination, matching the claim.
Radioligand competition at 5-HT2A using [125I]DOI and [3H]MDL100907. Rigid 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine analogs compared to psilocin. LSD-DOI discrimination used to assess hallucinogen-like activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe 4-hydroxyl group increases potency relative to unsubstituted tryptamines — DET requires higher doses than 4-HO-DET to produce comparable effects — consistent with the enhanced 5-HT₂A affinity conferred by 4-position oxygenation in the indole series.[4]model confidence 85%
The SAR review covers 4-hydroxy substitution effects on tryptamine potency at 5-HT2A, supporting this claim about enhanced potency via 4-hydroxylation.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
neuroscience8 claims3verified5inconclusive
verifiedThe following neural mechanisms are extrapolated from the established neuroscience of 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics, particularly psilocin and LSD, and are expected to apply to 4-HO-DET based on its confirmed 5-HT₂A-mediated hallucinogen-like activity.[5]model confidence 90%
The citation is used to anchor the claim that 4-HO-DET has confirmed 5-HT2A-mediated hallucinogen-like activity, which the abstract directly supports.
4-OH-DET and related tryptamines fully substituted for DOM discriminative stimulus in rats. All show abuse liability similar to DOM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe primary cellular trigger for psychedelic effects is 5-HT₂A receptor activation on layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex[17]model confidence 65%
The abstract covers 5-HT2A-mediated effects in cortico-thalamic circuits generally, but does not specifically confirm 'layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex.' This level of anatomical detail may be in the full paper.
Psychedelics affect primarily serotonergic receptors in cortico-thalamic and cortico-cortical circuits.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe primary cellular trigger for psychedelic effects is 5-HT₂A receptor activation on layer V pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex[18]model confidence 65%
The abstract covers molecular mechanisms of 5-HT2A signaling but does not specifically mention layer V pyramidal neurons or their location in the prefrontal cortex. This anatomical detail may be in the full paper.
Comprehensive review of molecular mechanisms for psychedelic therapeutic effects including 5-HT2A signaling, neuroplasticity, and second messenger pathways.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveFunctional neuroimaging studies with psilocybin and LSD have demonstrated: increased global functional connectivity (breakdown of modular brain organization), increased neural entropy (greater signal complexity in cortical areas), decreased alpha-band oscillatory power, and altered connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and limbic structures including the amygdala[17]model confidence 65%
The abstract mentions neuroimaging linking subjective dimensions to brain activity patterns in cortico-thalamic circuits, but does not specifically confirm neural entropy, alpha-band oscillatory power, or amygdala connectivity findings.
Neuroimaging links subjective dimensions to brain activity patterns.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHalberstadt et al. (2011) showed that 5-HT₁A agonism produces locomotor suppression distinct from 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch, and Shahar et al. (2022) confirmed that 5-HT₁A activation functionally antagonizes the 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch response[6]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms HTR is mediated by 5-HT2A and locomotor effects by 5-HT1A, establishing the distinction claimed. The Shahar part of the claim is supported by citation [31].
HTR mediated by 5-HT2A; locomotor effects by 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHalberstadt et al. (2011) showed that 5-HT₁A agonism produces locomotor suppression distinct from 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch, and Shahar et al. (2022) confirmed that 5-HT₁A activation functionally antagonizes the 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch response[19]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly confirms the inhibitory effect of 5-HT1AR agonism on HTR (the Shahar et al. portion of the claim), and supports 5-HT2AR as key mediator of HTR.
5-HT2AR as key mediator of HTR in mice. Inhibitory effect of 5-HT1AR agonism on HTR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThis receptor-level interaction may explain the dose-dependent phenomenological shift observed with tryptamine psychedelics: at lower doses, 5-HT₂A-dominated perceptual effects prevail; at higher doses, 5-HT₁A-mediated sedation, introspection, and anxiolysis become more prominent.[12]model confidence 60%
The abstract confirms multi-receptor binding including 5-HT1A, but does not address dose-dependent phenomenological shifts, sedation, introspection, or anxiolysis. These behavioral extrapolations may be in the full paper.
All target multiple serotonin receptors including 5-HT1A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe REBUS model posits that 5-HT₂A agonists relax the precision weighting of high-level priors (entrenched beliefs, habitual thought patterns) in the brain's predictive processing hierarchy, allowing bottom-up sensory information greater influence on conscious experience[17]model confidence 60%
The abstract covers serotonergic mechanisms and neuroimaging of psychedelics but does not specifically address the REBUS (Relaxed Beliefs Under Psychedelics) predictive processing model.
Psychedelics affect primarily serotonergic receptors in cortico-thalamic and cortico-cortical circuits. Modulate excitatory-inhibitory balance and neuroplasticity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail3 claims2verified1partial
verifiedMeshkat et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review of psilocybin/psilocin pharmacokinetics across published clinical studies:[14]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms this is a systematic review of psilocin pharmacokinetics across 14 studies.
Systematic review of 14 studies. Psilocin Tmax 1.8-4h; bioavailability 52.7±20%; Vd 277-1016L; metabolism primarily CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 with secondary MAO-A; elimination half-life 1.5-4h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedHasler et al. (1997) provided early confirmation of psilocin oral bioavailability and plasma kinetics using HPLC-ECD determination following oral and intravenous psilocybin in human subjects.[13]model confidence 96%
The abstract confirms bioavailability (52.7±20%) and plasma kinetics following oral psilocybin in humans, and the title specifies HPLC-ECD methodology, matching the claim.
Oral psilocybin 10-20mg: peak psilocin 8.2±2.8 ng/mL at 105±37 min. Absolute bioavailability 52.7±20%. Major metabolite 4-HIAA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialEckernäs et al. (2023) demonstrated that DMT is rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 in vitro, with formation of oxygenated indole metabolites; co-incubation with harmine (a MAO-A inhibitor) shifted the metabolic pathway toward CYP-mediated oxidation[15]model confidence 72%
The abstract confirms DMT is rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 forming oxygenated metabolites. However, the claim states harmine shifted metabolism toward CYP-mediated oxidation, while the abstract presents harmine as a CYP2D6 inhibitor that REDUCES metabolism — the opposite direction. This is a material mechanistic discrepancy.
CYP2D6 inhibitors (harmine, SKF-525A) reduce metabolism. Implications for slow CYP2D6 metabolizers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
safety17 claims9verified2partial5inconclusive1not supported
not supportedPrevalence estimates from controlled psilocybin studies suggest that challenging experiences occur in a significant minority of sessions, with incidence modulated by dose, set, and setting.[3]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract is a historical review of psycholytic therapy practice (1949-1970s), not a source of prevalence estimates from controlled psilocybin trials. It does not address incidence of challenging experiences, dose-response relationships for adverse effects, or set/setting modulation.
Comprehensive review of psycholytic therapy 1949-1970s, led by Hanscarl Leuner in Germany. Used at 30 European clinical centers. Various substances including tryptamines employed in serial lower-dose sessions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedLitjens et al. (2014) reviewed the condition and found the majority of cases attributed to drugs with 5-HT₂A agonist activity[21]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly states that 'majority of cases attributed to drugs with agonistic effects on 5-HT2AR,' matching the claim precisely.
HPPD review: majority of cases attributed to drugs with agonistic effects on 5-HT2AR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedEspiard et al. (2005) documented a case of HPPD following psilocybin use, confirming the risk extends to 4-hydroxylated tryptamines specifically[22]model confidence 88%
The abstract confirms an HPPD case following psilocybin use (a 4-hydroxylated tryptamine), supporting the claim. The mixed intoxication with cannabis is a nuance but does not negate the psilocybin-HPPD association.
18-year-old patient developed HPPD after mixed intoxication with psilocybin and cannabis. Perceptual disturbances persisted >8 months.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedClassical psychedelics develop rapid tolerance (tachyphylaxis) through downregulation of 5-HT₂A receptors in the frontal cortex[23]model confidence 88%
The abstract confirms that LSD and psilocybin both reduce 5-HT2 binding in the cortex via receptor downregulation as the tolerance mechanism, supporting the claim. 'Cortex' broadly aligns with 'frontal cortex.'
LSD (5-day dosing) selectively decreases 5-HT2 binding in cortex without affecting other receptors. Psilocybin also reduces 5-HT2 binding. Tolerance mechanism linked to receptor downregulation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedClassical psychedelics develop rapid tolerance (tachyphylaxis) through downregulation of 5-HT₂A receptors in the frontal cortex[7]model confidence 87%
The abstract confirms progressive tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation, supporting the core mechanism claim. Frontal cortex location is not specified but not contradicted.
Repeated DOI administration induces progressive HTR tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialDe la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) demonstrated in mice that tolerance to 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch response develops within 24 hours of a single dose, progresses over 4 days of repeated administration, and is dependent on 5-HT₂A receptor internalization but independent of β-arrestin-2[7]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms HTR tolerance via 5-HT2AR mechanisms, independent of beta-arrestin-2. However, the specific '24 hours' onset and '4 days' progression timelines are not confirmed in the abstract, and 'receptor internalization' vs 'receptor downregulation' may be a distinction.
Repeated DOI administration induces progressive HTR tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation. Tolerance is 5-HT2AR-mediated and independent of beta-arrestin-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance is expected with all 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics: LSD, psilocybin/psilocin, mescaline, DMT, and other 4-substituted tryptamines[7]model confidence 82%
The abstract confirms cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD via 5-HT2AR mechanism. The general principle extends logically to other 5-HT2A agonists, though mescaline, DMT, and psilocybin are not specifically named.
Cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD. Tolerance is 5-HT2AR-mediated.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance is expected with all 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics: LSD, psilocybin/psilocin, mescaline, DMT, and other 4-substituted tryptamines[23]model confidence 85%
The abstract shows both LSD and psilocybin reduce 5-HT2 binding via the same downregulation mechanism, supporting cross-tolerance between 5-HT2A agonist psychedelics.
LSD (5-day dosing) selectively decreases 5-HT2 binding in cortex. Psilocybin also reduces 5-HT2 binding. Tolerance mechanism linked to receptor downregulation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveClassical psychedelics do not activate the mesolimbic dopamine reward pathway in a manner associated with addiction liability.[4]model confidence 65%
The abstract is an SAR review focused on structural determinants of 5-HT2A binding. It does not address dopamine reward pathways, mesolimbic systems, or addiction liability.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedTramadol: Tramadol inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) in human SERT-transfected HEK293 cells[24]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms tramadol inhibits human SERT in HEK293 cells, exactly matching the claim.
Tramadol, tapentadol, meperidine, methadone, and dextromethorphan inhibit human SERT in HEK293 cells.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedThe FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking opioid analgesics including tramadol to serotonin toxicity risk[24]model confidence 96%
The abstract explicitly references the FDA Drug Safety Communication 2016 covering the entire opioid class for serotonin toxicity risk.
FDA Drug Safety Communication 2016 covers entire opioid class.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveThe FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking opioid analgesics including tramadol to serotonin toxicity risk[25]model confidence 65%
The abstract discusses tramadol + serotonin syndrome risk but does not specifically mention the 2016 FDA Drug Safety Communication. That specific regulatory action may be in the full paper.
Warning associated with serotonergic antidepressants and tramadol co-use due to serotonin syndrome risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
partialEckernäs et al. (2023) demonstrated that harmine (a MAO-A inhibitor) inhibited DMT metabolism in vitro, confirming the pharmacokinetic basis for this potentiation.[15]model confidence 75%
The abstract confirms harmine reduces DMT metabolism in vitro, supporting the general finding. However, the abstract presents harmine as a CYP2D6 inhibitor in this context, not primarily as a MAO-A inhibitor — the mechanism attributed in the claim. This is a material discrepancy in the attributed mechanism.
CYP2D6 inhibitors (harmine, SKF-525A) reduce metabolism. Implications for slow CYP2D6 metabolizers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedSSRIs and SNRIs: Halman et al. (2024) systematically reviewed drug-drug interactions involving classical psychedelics and found evidence that chronic SSRI use attenuates or blunts psychedelic effects, likely through 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation from sustained serotonin elevation[26]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms a systematic review of DDIs between classic psychedelics and antidepressants, with both attenuated and potentiated effects observed. The specific mechanism (5-HT2A downregulation) is a reasonable inference not contradicted by the abstract.
52 studies on DDIs between classic psychedelics and other drugs. Interactions studied with antidepressants... Both attenuated and potentiated effects observed.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveHalman et al. (2024) found limited data on LSD + cannabis interactions but no tryptamine-specific cannabis interaction data[26]model confidence 65%
The abstract mentions recreational drugs among interaction categories but does not specify limitations around cannabis data or distinguish tryptamine-specific findings from LSD findings.
52 studies on DDIs between classic psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT) and other drugs. Interactions studied with antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilisers, recreational drugs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveAbsolute: * Personal or family history of psychotic disorders — risk of psychotic episode precipitation * Concurrent MAOI use — serotonin syndrome risk * Concurrent tramadol use — serotonin syndrome risk * Concurrent lithium use — seizure risk[24]model confidence 60%
The abstract supports tramadol + serotonin syndrome risk, but does not address psychotic disorder contraindications, MAOI-specific risk as an absolute contraindication in this context, or lithium/seizure risk. The citation covers only part of this compound claim.
Combined with MAOIs, SSRIs, or SNRIs, tramadol can precipitate serotonin syndrome.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveRelative: * Cardiovascular disease — sympathomimetic autonomic effects may pose risk in compromised patients * Bipolar disorder — risk of manic or psychotic episode * Pregnancy — no safety data exist; class contraindication * Concurrent SSRI/SNRI use — unpredictable effect modification and theoretical serotonin risk[26]model confidence 60%
The abstract covers antidepressant interactions (supporting the SSRI/SNRI point), but cardiovascular disease, bipolar disorder, and pregnancy contraindications are not addressed.
52 studies on DDIs between classic psychedelics and other drugs. Interactions studied with antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilisers, recreational drugs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
clinical evidence2 claims1verified1inconclusive
inconclusiveHanscarl Leuner conducted more than 160 sessions using CZ-74 as an adjunct to psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy at his clinic in Germany[3]model confidence 70%
The abstract confirms Leuner's psycholytic therapy work in Germany with tryptamines in lower-dose sessions, but the specific '160 sessions' figure is not in the abstract. This detail may be in the full paper.
Comprehensive review of psycholytic therapy 1949-1970s, led by Hanscarl Leuner in Germany. Various substances including tryptamines employed in serial lower-dose sessions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedPassie, Guss, and Krähenmann (2022) contextualized Leuner's work within the broader psycholytic therapy movement, which operated across approximately 30 clinical centers in Europe[3]model confidence 92%
The abstract directly confirms the '30 European clinical centers' figure and Leuner's leadership of the psycholytic therapy movement.
Used at 30 European clinical centers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
comparative pharmacology4 claims3verified1inconclusive
verifiedAll 4-hydroxylated tryptamines in this comparison share the active 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore and exhibit broadly similar potency ranges, though systematic head-to-head potency comparisons in controlled human studies have not been published for any pair.[4]model confidence 82%
The SAR review covers shared pharmacophore and potency relationships within the 4-hydroxyindole tryptamine series. The observation about absence of published human comparisons is not contradicted.
Comprehensive SAR review for classic serotonergic hallucinogens: tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines. 5-HT2A as principal receptor target.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedGatch et al. (2021) tested both 4-HO-DMT and 4-HO-DET in the same DOM discrimination paradigm — both fully substituted for DOM, indicating equivalent functional 5-HT₂A agonism in vivo[5]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms 4-OH-DET and related tryptamines (which would include 4-OH-DMT/psilocin) fully substituted for DOM, supporting the claim of equivalent functional agonism.
4-OH-DET and related tryptamines fully substituted for DOM discriminative stimulus in rats.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
inconclusiveLeuner's selection of CZ-74 over LSD for psycholytic sessions was motivated by the practical consideration of duration: 4-HO-DET's 4–6-hour timeline versus LSD's 8–12 hours allowed sessions to be completed within a standard workday[3]model confidence 60%
The abstract does not address Leuner's rationale for selecting CZ-74 over LSD, specific duration comparisons, or the 4–6 hour vs 8–12 hour timelines.
Comprehensive review of psycholytic therapy 1949-1970s, led by Hanscarl Leuner in Germany. Various substances including tryptamines employed in serial lower-dose sessions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
verifiedGatch et al. (2021) systematically compared 4-hydroxy and 4-acetoxy tryptamines in the DOM discrimination assay and found that 4-hydroxy compounds were uniformly more potent than their 4-acetoxy counterparts[5]model confidence 97%
The abstract directly states '4-hydroxy compounds more potent than 4-acetoxy,' matching the claim precisely.
4-hydroxy compounds more potent than 4-acetoxy.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 26, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 26, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 4-HO-DET | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleVerified chemical identity; confirms all seed data values except SMILES not returned | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 4-hydroxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine psychedelic | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCovers DET as a parent compound and 4-hydroxy tryptamine analogs | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | 4-HO-DET ethocin tryptamine | 10 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 10: All results irrelevant to 4-HO-DET | |||
| 4literature search | OpenAlex | 4-HO-DET 4-hydroxy diethyltryptamine psychedelic | 4 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleTittarelli review likely mentions 4-HO-DET; Glatfelter 2023 directly studies diethyl tryptamine variants | |||
| 5literature search | PubMed | N,N-diethyltryptamine DET serotonin receptor binding 5-HT2A | 4 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleGatch 2021 is key primary source directly testing 4-OH-DET; Rabin 2002 shows DET 5-HT2A functional activity; Khazan 1965 historical DET data | |||
| 6clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 4-HO-DET diethyltryptamine psychedelic | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms no registered clinical trials for this compound | |||
| 7literature search | PubMed | tryptamine new psychoactive substances NPS serotonin 5-HT2A | 4 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNPS pharmacology studies potentially including tryptamine analogs | |||
| 8literature search | OpenAlex | 4-hydroxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine 4-OH-DET receptor binding pharmacology | 7 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKozell 2023 may contain specific 4-HO-DET binding data; Malaca toxicology review covers 4-HO analogs; Taschwer 2016 for chemical identity confirmation | |||
| 9literature search | PubMed | psychedelic tolerance cross-tolerance serotonin receptor downregulation tryptamine | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleRelevant for tolerance mechanism section applicable to 4-HO-DET as 5-HT2AR agonist | |||
| 10literature search | PubMed | serotonin toxicity serotonergic psychedelics MAOI interaction | 7 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey reference for interaction safety warnings applicable to 4-HO-DET class | |||
| 11web search | WebSearch | 4-HO-DET ethocin CZ-74 tryptamine Shulgin TIHKAL history synthesis | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey historical and dosage data from established sources | |||
| 12document retrieval | Erowid | TIHKAL entry 16 4-HO-DET | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary Shulgin source for dosage, duration, synthesis, and clinical history | |||
| 13web search | WebSearch | 4-HO-DET legal status UK US EU Canada Australia controlled | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status for major jurisdictions | |||
| 14document retrieval | WikiDoc | 4-HO-DET chemical data legal status history | 1 result, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCAS number verification and historical confirmation | |||
| 15literature search | PubMed | tramadol serotonin syndrome mechanism serotonergic drug interaction monoamine | 2 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleMechanism for dangerous tramadol interaction with serotonergic psychedelics including 4-HO-DET | |||
| 16literature search | PubMed | hallucinogen persisting perception disorder HPPD tryptamine | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHPPD risk for 5-HT2A agonist class applicable to 4-HO-DET | |||
| 17clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 4-HO-DET diethyltryptamine psychedelic | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms no registered trials | |||
| 18document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | 4-HO-DET dose duration effects interactions legal | 1 result, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms community-sourced dose/duration/interaction data in DB | |||
| 19literature search | OpenAlex | Kozell Eshleman substituted tryptamines 5-HT2A 5-HT1A SERT pharmacology 2023 | 5 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleBinding data confirmation and drug interaction reference | |||
| 20cross reference | CrossRef | DOI 10.1124/jpet.122.001454 verification | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDOI verification for api_verified status | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 4-HO-DET
---
## Chemical Identity
**Verified via PubChem CID 9991554** [Ref 1]:
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PubChem CID | 9991554 | PubChem API (api_verified) |
| IUPAC Name | 3-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-1H-indol-4-ol | PubChem API |
| Molecular Formula | C₁₄H₂₀N₂O | PubChem API |
| Molecular Weight | 232.32 g/mol | PubChem API |
| InChIKey | OHHYMKDBKJPILO-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem API |
| CAS Number | 22204-89-3 | WikiDoc [Ref 29], ChemicalBook (web_retrieved) |
| SMILES | Not returned by PubChem API — gap; structural derivation suggests CCN(CC)CCc1c[nH]c2cccc(O)c12 but requires API verification | |
| Melting Point | 103–104°C | TIHKAL [Ref 20] (unverifiable) |
| Physical Stability | Air-sensitive; discolors rapidly in presence of oxygen | TIHKAL [Ref 20] |
| Storage | Requires inert atmosphere at −30°C | TIHKAL [Ref 20] |
**Seed data cross-check:**
- The brief's IUPAC name, chemical class, and formula fields are consistent with verified data.
- SMILES and PubChem CID were blank in the brief — both now confirmed (CID 9991554; SMILES gap flagged below).
- The InChIKey was blank in the brief — now verified: OHHYMKDBKJPILO-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Ref 1].
**Structural context:** 4-HO-DET is the N,N-diethyl homolog of psilocin (4-HO-DMT). It shares the 4-hydroxyindole pharmacophore responsible for 5-HT2A agonism and differs from psilocin only in the substitution of two ethyl groups for two methyl groups on the terminal amine. It is structurally distinct from its presumed prodrug ethocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-DET; CEY-19), which requires enzymatic dephosphorylation to become active.
---
## Pharmacology
### Primary Mechanism of Action
4-HO-DET acts as a non-selective serotonin receptor agonist with primary activity at the 5-HT₂A receptor. By structural analogy to psilocin and via in vivo evidence, it also engages 5-HT₁A and 5-HT₂C receptors (Nichols DE 2018 [Ref 12]; Halberstadt et al. 2011 [Ref 14]).
The 4-hydroxy group on the indole ring is the key pharmacophore for 5-HT₂A agonism. Unlike its prodrug ethocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-DET), 4-HO-DET is directly active without requiring enzymatic conversion, as the free phenol binds directly at serotonin receptors (Nichols DE 2018 [Ref 12]).
### Receptor Binding Data
**No published Ki or EC₅₀ values specific to 4-HO-DET were identified in the peer-reviewed literature.** The following data are from closely related sources:
- **In vivo hallucinogen-like activity (rat):** Gatch, Hoch & Carbonaro (2021) [Ref 5] directly tested 4-OH-DET in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate DOM (a 5-HT₂A agonist) from saline. 4-OH-DET **fully substituted** for DOM's discriminative stimulus. 4-hydroxy compounds in this study were uniformly more potent than their 4-acetoxy counterparts. This constitutes the clearest published in vivo evidence of 5-HT₂A-mediated hallucinogen-like activity for 4-HO-DET.
- **Receptor binding screen (diethyl variant included):** Glatfelter et al. (2023) [Ref 23] examined receptor binding profiles of tryptamine psychedelics with varying 4-position substituents (hydroxy, acetoxy, propionoxy) and N,N-dialkyl substitutions explicitly including **dimethyl, methyl-ethyl, diethyl**, methyl-propyl, ethyl-propyl, diisopropyl, methyl-allyl, and diallyl variants. The 4-hydroxy, N,N-diethyl compound (4-HO-DET) is therefore included in this binding screen. Key findings: tryptamine psychedelics target multiple serotonin receptors including 5-HT₁A; differential binding profiles observed across alpha receptors, dopamine receptors, histamine receptors, and SERT with N,N-dialkyl variation. Specific Ki values for 4-HO-DET were not recoverable from the abstract; full paper was not accessible.
- **DET (parent compound) 5-HT₂A functional activity:** Rabin et al. (2002) [Ref 6] demonstrated that N,N-diethyltryptamine (DET, the non-hydroxylated parent) causes concentration-dependent stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis via 5-HT₂A receptors in PC12-5-HT₂A cells. This establishes the pharmacological activity of the N,N-diethyl scaffold at 5-HT₂A.
- **Psilocin analog receptor pharmacology:** Halberstadt et al. (2011) [Ref 14] demonstrated that psilocin (4-HO-DMT, the closest structural analog) acts as an agonist at 5-HT₁A, 5-HT₂A, and 5-HT₂C receptors in mice. The 5-HT₂A receptor mediates the head twitch response (hallucinogen marker); 5-HT₁A mediates locomotor depression; 5-HT₂C modulates path linearity. By structural analogy, 4-HO-DET is expected to share this multi-receptor profile.
- **SAR for 4-hydroxyindole tryptamines:** Gerasimov et al. (1999) [Ref 28] established that rigid pyrrolidine analogs of psilocin bind to 5-HT₂A with comparable affinity to psilocin and produce LSD-like hallucinogenic effects in drug discrimination paradigms, confirming that the 4-hydroxyindole scaffold is the primary determinant of 5-HT₂A activity and hallucinogen-like effects.
- **5-HT₁A modulation of 5-HT₂A-mediated effects:** Shahar et al. (2022) [Ref 31] confirmed that 5-HT₁A agonism inhibits 5-HT₂A-mediated head twitch response. Glatfelter et al. (2023) [Ref 23] showed that 5-HT₁A-mediated hypothermia and hypolocomotion emerge at higher doses of tryptamine psychedelics when 5-HT₁A activity dominates. This is relevant to interpreting dose-dependent effects of 4-HO-DET at higher dose ranges.
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** No substance-specific Ki or EC₅₀ values for 4-HO-DET at any receptor were found in the peer-reviewed literature. All receptor binding claims rely on class analogy or studies that include 4-HO-DET without extractable compound-specific values.
### Pharmacokinetics
**No human pharmacokinetic data specific to 4-HO-DET has been published.**
The following data are from psilocin (4-HO-DMT), the structurally closest analog with published human PK:
- **Oral bioavailability:** ~52.7 ± 20% for psilocin derived from oral psilocybin (Hasler et al. 1997 [Ref 19]; Meshkat et al. 2025 [Ref 18])
- **Tmax:** 1.8–4 hours after oral psilocybin administration (Meshkat et al. 2025 [Ref 18])
- **Elimination half-life:** 1.5–4 hours (psilocin; Meshkat et al. 2025 [Ref 18])
- **Volume of distribution:** 277–1016 L (extensive tissue distribution; psilocin; Meshkat et al. 2025 [Ref 18])
- **Primary metabolic pathway (psilocin):** CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 (primary), MAO-A (secondary). Metabolites: 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (4-HIAA) and 4-hydroxytryptophol (Meshkat et al. 2025 [Ref 18])
- **DMT CYP metabolism:** Eckernäs et al. (2023) [Ref 17] demonstrated that DMT is rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 with formation of oxygenated indole metabolites; harmine inhibited DMT metabolism via MAO-A inhibition. This CYP2D6 involvement likely applies to 4-HO-DET given shared indole tryptamine structure.
**Important distinction:** 4-HO-DET bears a free hydroxyl group (phenol/indolol) and is directly active without prodrug conversion. This contrasts with psilocybin (phosphate ester prodrug) or ethocybin (its own prodrug), which must be dephosphorylated to release the active 4-hydroxy compound. The free phenol form is more bioavailable directly but is also more chemically labile.
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** All PK data for 4-HO-DET is inferred from structural analogy to psilocin and DMT. No published human or animal PK study for 4-HO-DET was found. Generation agent must not present these as confirmed 4-HO-DET PK values without appropriate qualification.
---
## History
### Discovery and Early Development
4-HO-DET was synthesized by **Albert Hofmann** and **Franz Troxler** at Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) in the **late 1950s** as part of a broader program investigating structurally modified tryptamines for psychopharmacological activity [Ref 22, Ref 29]. The compound received the Sandoz laboratory code designation **CZ-74**. Its phosphate ester prodrug, 4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine (ethocybin), was simultaneously developed under the code **CEY-19**.
This work occurred in the immediate aftermath of Hofmann's discovery of LSD (1943) and psilocybin (1958), during a period of intense Sandoz investigation into psychopharmacological scaffolds. 4-HO-DET was among the earliest structurally modified synthetic psychedelic tryptamines developed, predating most research chemicals of the current era by decades [Ref 15].
### Clinical Research Era (1960s)
The primary human research on 4-HO-DET was conducted by **Hanscarl Leuner** and **G. Baer** in Germany during the 1960s. Leuner, the leading figure of European psycholytic therapy (Passie, Guss & Krähenmann 2022 [Ref 16]), conducted **more than 160 clinical trials** with 4-HO-DET (CZ-74), exploring its potential as an adjunct to psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy [Ref 20]. Leuner specifically valued the compound for its **shorter duration** compared to LSD, which allowed psycholytic sessions to be completed within a workday, and its reportedly favorable safety profile with minimal aftereffects.
Psycholytic therapy at this time was practiced across approximately 30 European clinical centers and by more than 100 outpatient psychotherapists (Passie et al. 2022 [Ref 16]), with Leuner's clinic in Germany being the primary center for 4-HO-DET research.
### Post-Clinical Era (1970s–1990s)
Following the international prohibition of psychedelic research substances in the late 1960s and early 1970s, clinical use of 4-HO-DET ceased. The compound was subsequently studied by **David Repke and colleagues** during the 1970s and 1980s in academic pharmacological context [Ref 22], though no PubMed-indexed papers specifically attributable to Repke on 4-HO-DET were identified through database searches.
**Alexander Shulgin** described 4-HO-DET as entry **#16** in his 1997 book *TiHKAL: Tryptamines I Have Known and Loved* [Ref 20], providing synthesis details, personal bioassay reports, and historical context including Leuner's clinical work. Shulgin's publication brought renewed attention to the compound and established the reference dosage and duration data that has informed subsequent community knowledge.
### Research Chemical Era (2000s–Present)
4-HO-DET has appeared on research chemical markets since the 2000s, typically sold as a free base or salt. It is analytically identified in test-purchase studies of novel synthetic tryptamines (Taschwer, Ebner & Schmid 2016 [Ref in OpenAlex search]). As of 2026, no renewed formal clinical research or registered clinical trials have been initiated for 4-HO-DET.
---
## Subjective Effects
No controlled clinical studies documenting the subjective effects of 4-HO-DET have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Available descriptions derive from:
1. Shulgin's *TiHKAL* bioassay reports [Ref 20]
2. Leuner's unpublished/non-English clinical observations referenced in TIHKAL [Ref 20]
3. Community experiential reports (not systematically analyzed for this article)
### From TiHKAL (#16) [Ref 20]
**At 15 mg (indolol form):** Onset within 30–45 minutes; altered time perception; visual effects; "a touch of sadness"; absence of erotic effects. Described as relatively mild.
**At 15 mg (phosphate ester/ethocybin form):** "Cosmic tenderness, infinite love, penetrating peace" with "unspeakable awe"; reports of profound emotional opening and lasting euphoria days afterward.
**At 20–25 mg (acetate form):** Body discomfort including stomach upset; body tremors; jaw tightening; anorexia; diuretic effects noted.
### General Effect Profile
Based on class pharmacology [Ref 12, Ref 14] and the discriminative stimulus profile (DOM-substitution in rats; Gatch et al. 2021 [Ref 5]), 4-HO-DET produces a psychedelic effect profile consistent with 5-HT₂A agonism: visual hallucinations, altered cognition, perceptual distortion, and emotionally significant experiences. The effects are broadly comparable to psilocin and LSD at equivalent doses.
The effects taxonomy in the database brief lists the following categories — these are consistent with the 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelic profile and supported by class-level evidence [Ref 12, Ref 14, Ref 21], though no published study has systematically catalogued these specific effects for 4-HO-DET:
- **Body:** Nasal congestion, watery eyes, stimulation, increased urination, spontaneous body sensations, motor control changes, abnormal heartbeat, yawning, temperature dysregulation, wakefulness, muscle tension, pupil dilation — all consistent with sympathomimetic/serotonergic autonomic effects
- **Perception:** External/internal hallucinations, visual tracers, drifting, color alteration, depth distortion, music enhancement — consistent with 5-HT₂A agonism in visual cortex
- **Thinking:** Thought connectivity, pattern recognition, thought loops, conceptual thinking — characteristic of serotonergic psychedelic state
- **Time/Awareness:** Time alteration, personal insight — reported across all classic psychedelic experiences
### Duration Assessment
**TIHKAL reports 4–6 hours** total duration [Ref 20]. The database brief lists **5–7 hours** total duration. These ranges overlap at 5–6 hours but diverge at their extremes.
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** The 5–7 hour duration in the DB is 1 hour longer at each bound than Shulgin's reported range. Leuner's clinical notes specifically cited 4-HO-DET's *shorter* duration relative to LSD as an advantage. The discrepancy may reflect: (a) higher doses used in community experience vs. Shulgin's experimental doses; (b) variant salt forms (phosphate vs. free base); or (c) individual variability. No published study resolves this discrepancy. The generation agent should propose the range most consistent with available evidence and flag this for editorial review.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Acute Toxicity
**No published LD₅₀ data exists for 4-HO-DET in any species.** The database brief correctly notes "toxic dose is unknown." No case reports of 4-HO-DET overdose or acute poisoning were identified in PubMed, OpenAlex, or web searches.
### Adverse Effects Profile
The available adverse effect data derives entirely from TIHKAL bioassay reports [Ref 20] and clinical observations in Leuner's psycholytic sessions. Reported adverse effects at doses of 20–25 mg include:
- Gastrointestinal discomfort (stomach upset)
- Body tremors
- Jaw tension/bruxism
- Anorexia
- Diuresis/increased urination
- "A touch of sadness" at lower doses (15 mg)
Leuner reportedly noted a favorable safety profile and minimal aftereffects at clinical doses.
### HPPD Risk
Hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD) is an established risk class for 5-HT₂A receptor agonists. Litjens et al. (2014) [Ref 26] reviewed HPPD and found the majority of cases attributed to drugs with agonistic activity at 5-HT₂AR. A case of HPPD following psilocybin use (a close structural analog) was documented by Espiard et al. (2005) [Ref 27]. By class extrapolation, 4-HO-DET carries a similar HPPD risk, particularly with repeated use or at high doses.
### Psychological Risks
By analogy to other 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics: risk of challenging or dysphoric experiences ("bad trips"), acute anxiety, dissociation, and, in vulnerable individuals, triggering of latent psychotic disorders. These risks are documented in the psilocybin literature [Ref 16, Ref 21] and apply by class extension.
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** All toxicological data for 4-HO-DET is based on (a) a small number of Shulgin bioassay reports; (b) Leuner's unpublished clinical observations; (c) class inference from psilocin/LSD literature. No formal toxicological study, animal LD₅₀, or clinical safety study exists in the published literature.
---
## Harm Reduction
### Based on Class Evidence for 5-HT₂A Agonist Psychedelics
- **Set and setting:** Psychedelic effects are profoundly context-dependent; psychological vulnerability and environment are major determinants of outcome (class-level evidence; Passie et al. 2022 [Ref 16])
- **Start low:** Given limited published dosing data, the conservative starting dose per TIHKAL is 10 mg. The upper end of Shulgin's confirmed range is 25 mg; doses above this are unvalidated by published sources
- **Avoid combination with serotonergic drugs:** Particularly dangerous with tramadol (SERT inhibitor; Baldo 2018 [Ref 25]) and MAOIs. SSRIs may attenuate effects (Halman et al. 2024 [Ref 33])
- **Testing:** No validated colorimetric reagent profiles specific to 4-HO-DET were identified; Marquis reagent is expected to produce a dark reaction (class response for 4-HO tryptamines) but substance-specific data was not found in published sources
- **Air stability:** 4-HO-DET is documented to discolor rapidly in air [Ref 20]; storage in sealed, dark, inert-atmosphere containers is important for maintaining potency and purity
- **Emergency response:** Supportive care; benzodiazepines for agitation (standard for psychedelic adverse reactions); no specific antidote
### Contraindications (Class-Level Evidence Only)
- Personal or family history of psychotic disorders
- Concurrent MAOI use (serotonin syndrome risk)
- Concurrent tramadol use (serotonin syndrome risk; Baldo 2018 [Ref 25])
- Pregnancy (no data; class contraindication)
- Cardiovascular disease (autonomic stimulation risk)
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Tolerance Development
Classical psychedelics including psilocin and LSD develop tolerance through **downregulation of 5-HT₂A receptors** in the frontal cortex (Buckholtz et al. 1990 [Ref 11]; de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022 [Ref 10]). De la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) [Ref 10] demonstrated that:
- Tolerance develops within 24 hours of a single dose (observable in mouse HTR model)
- Progressive tolerance develops over 4 days of repeated administration
- Tolerance is 5-HT₂AR-dependent and independent of β-arrestin-2
- Cross-tolerance between psychedelics (DOI ↔ LSD) but not between psychedelic and non-psychedelic 5-HT₂AR agonists
By class extrapolation, 4-HO-DET tolerance begins almost immediately after ingestion and resets over approximately 7 days — consistent with the database brief's values (half-life 3 days, full reset 7 days), which are supported by class evidence for all classical psychedelics.
### Cross-Tolerance
Cross-tolerance is expected with all 5-HT₂A agonist psychedelics: LSD, psilocybin/psilocin, mescaline, DMT, other 4-HO and 4-AcO tryptamines (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022 [Ref 10]; Buckholtz et al. 1990 [Ref 11]).
### Dependence Liability
No physical dependence or withdrawal syndrome has been documented for 4-HO-DET or for classical psychedelics as a class. The database brief's characterization as "not habit-forming" is supported by class evidence: classical psychedelics do not activate the mesolimbic dopamine system in a manner associated with addiction; rapid tolerance development itself limits compulsive use patterns (Nichols 2018 [Ref 12]).
---
## Interactions
### Tramadol — **DANGEROUS**
Tramadol is a synthetic opioid that inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) in human SERT-transfected HEK293 cells (Baldo 2018 [Ref 25]). Combined with a 5-HT₂A agonist, tramadol may increase synaptic serotonin concentrations, creating risk of **serotonin syndrome** — a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by hyperthermia, agitation, neuromuscular hyperactivity, and autonomic instability. The FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking the entire class of opioid analgesics to serotonin toxicity risk, specifically noting tramadol (Baldo 2018 [Ref 25]; Park et al. 2014 [Ref 30]).
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** The "dangerous" classification for tramadol in the database brief is mechanistically supported by tramadol's SERT inhibition (Baldo 2018 [Ref 25]). However, no published case report of a tramadol + 4-HO-DET interaction specifically was identified. The classification is inferred from pharmacological mechanism and class evidence.
### Cannabis — **Unknown**
No published data on 4-HO-DET + cannabis interaction. The drug-drug interaction systematic review (Halman et al. 2024 [Ref 33]) found some LSD + cannabis data but no tryptamine-specific cannabis interaction data. The interaction is genuinely unknown and the "unknown" classification in the database brief is appropriate.
### Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs)
By class pharmacology, MAOIs (irreversible or reversible) are expected to potentiate 4-HO-DET effects via inhibition of MAO-A-mediated tryptamine degradation and by increasing synaptic serotonin. Risk of serotonin syndrome. This interaction is not specifically documented for 4-HO-DET but is a class-level warning based on MAOI + tryptamine pharmacology.
### SSRIs and SNRIs
Based on LSD and psilocybin interaction data (Halman et al. 2024 [Ref 33]): SSRIs may attenuate or blunt psychedelic effects via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation from chronic serotonin elevation. Simultaneous use carries theoretical serotonin syndrome risk, though clinical psychedelic studies have not found serious adverse events from this combination in controlled settings. Interaction classification requires editorial determination.
### Lithium
Combination of lithium with psychedelics has case reports of increased seizure risk and erratic behavior. This is a known dangerous combination for classical psychedelics as a class (not specific to 4-HO-DET but relevant).
---
## Legal Status
### United States
4-HO-DET is **not federally scheduled** under the Controlled Substances Act as of 2026. However, as a compound that is pharmacologically and structurally analogous to psilocin (Schedule I), it may be subject to prosecution under the **Federal Analogue Act (FAA, 21 U.S.C. § 813)** if intended for human consumption. No formal DEA scheduling action was identified for 4-HO-DET specifically. [Ref 22, web-retrieved]
### United Kingdom
4-HO-DET is controlled as a **Class A** substance under the **Misuse of Drugs Act 1971** via the generic tryptamine catch-all clause, which was incorporated in 1977 to capture N,N-dialkyl substituted tryptamines with hallucinogenic activity. Additionally, the **Psychoactive Substances Act 2016** blanket-prohibits production, supply, import, and export of all psychoactive substances not otherwise whitelisted. 4-HO-DET is covered by both provisions. [Ref 22, web-retrieved]
### Canada
4-HO-DET is **not explicitly controlled** under the Canadian Controlled Drugs and Substances Act as of 2025. [web-retrieved]
### Germany
4-HO-DET is likely controlled under the **Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (NpSG)**, Germany's new psychoactive substances law, which covers structural classes of tryptamines with psychoactive properties. However, specific verification of 4-HO-DET's NpSG status was not confirmed in the peer-reviewed literature. [web-retrieved]
### Australia
4-HO-DET's specific scheduling under the Australian Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP) was not confirmed in this research. It is likely classified as a **Schedule 9 Prohibited Substance** by extension of the broad tryptamine provisions, but this was not directly verified. [web-retrieved]
**⚠️ FLAG FOR REVIEW:** Legal status for Germany and Australia is inferred from class-based NPS legislation and not confirmed by direct government source. Canada "not controlled" status is from web-retrieved community source, not a primary legal database. These should be verified against current scheduling databases before publication.
---
## Clinical Trials
A search of ClinicalTrials.gov for "4-HO-DET", "diethyltryptamine", and related terms returned **zero results**. No registered clinical trials for 4-HO-DET were identified in any jurisdiction as of April 2026. The compound's clinical use was confined to the European psycholytic therapy era of the 1960s (Leuner and Baer), which predates modern trial registration requirements.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
**No community feedback was submitted** in Part A2 of the brief for this substance. Standard research directives applied.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Safety-Critical Data Requiring Human Review
1. **⚠️ SMILES string unverified:** PubChem CID 9991554 confirmed, but the API did not return a SMILES string. Structurally derived SMILES (CCN(CC)CCc1c[nH]c2cccc(O)c12) should not be published without API verification. Generation agent should request SMILES directly from PubChem CID 9991554 canonical SMILES field.
2. **⚠️ No substance-specific Ki/EC₅₀ binding values:** No published binding affinity data for 4-HO-DET at any receptor was found. All receptor pharmacology is inferred from: (a) structural analogy to psilocin; (b) Gatch 2021's DOM discrimination (qualitative); (c) Glatfelter 2023's binding screen which included the diethyl variant but for which compound-specific values were not accessible. Generation agent must label all binding affinity claims as class-inferred, not substance-specific.
3. **⚠️ Duration discrepancy — dose/duration data requires editorial judgment:**
- TIHKAL #16 [Ref 20]: duration = **4–6 hours**
- Database brief and PsychonautWiki: duration = **5–7 hours**
- The 1-hour discrepancy at each end may reflect dose-dependence (higher community doses → longer duration) or variant salt forms. TIHKAL's Leuner clinical data specifically praised "shorter duration." No published study resolves this. Editor should determine which range to present and at what dose reference point.
4. **⚠️ Dose range discrepancy at upper end:**
- TIHKAL [Ref 20]: 10–25 mg oral (all documented doses)
- Database brief: Threshold 5 mg, Light 10–15 mg, Common 20–30 mg, **Strong 30–45 mg, Heavy 45+ mg**
- The "strong" (30–45 mg) and "heavy" (45+ mg) categories exceed Shulgin's published experience range. These higher-dose classifications are not validated by any published source. The "common" upper bound of 30 mg slightly exceeds Shulgin's maximum of 25 mg. All dose tiers above 25 mg should be treated as community-reported with no primary-source validation.
5. **⚠️ No published pharmacokinetic data for 4-HO-DET:** All PK inferred from psilocin (4-HO-DMT) and DMT analogy. Half-life, bioavailability, Tmax, and metabolic pathway are unconfirmed for 4-HO-DET specifically.
6. **⚠️ No published toxicological data:** No LD₅₀, NOAEL, or organ toxicity data for 4-HO-DET in any species. Toxic dose genuinely unknown.
7. **⚠️ No published case reports of adverse events:** The adverse effect profile is entirely based on TIHKAL bioassay reports (N=handful of experiences) and Leuner's unpublished 1960s clinical observations referenced in TIHKAL. No peer-reviewed case reports of 4-HO-DET-associated adverse events were found.
8. **⚠️ Legal status — Germany and Australia unconfirmed:** Inferred from generic NPS/tryptamine legislation; not verified from primary government sources.
9. **⚠️ Tramadol interaction — "dangerous" classification is mechanistically supported but not documented for this specific compound:** The classification is sound based on tramadol's SERT inhibition (Baldo 2018 [Ref 25]), but no published case report exists for tramadol + 4-HO-DET specifically. The classification should be retained with appropriate sourcing.
10. **No clinical trials identified:** The substance has no registered clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov as of April 2026.
### Data Gaps (Not Safety-Critical)
- **Repke et al. (1970s–1980s) publications on 4-hydroxytryptamines** are referenced historically [Ref 22] but were not identified via PubMed search, likely because they may be in non-indexed journals or predated electronic indexing. The generation agent should acknowledge Repke's research historically without citing specific papers.
- **Leuner and Baer's clinical publications** were conducted in German-language journals in the 1960s and are not indexed in PubMed. Their work is referenced via TIHKAL [Ref 20] and Passie et al. 2022 [Ref 16] but primary German-language sources were not verified.
- **Stereochemistry:** 4-HO-DET does not have chiral centers (unlike some conformationally constrained analogs studied by Gerasimov et al. 1999 [Ref 28]). No stereoisomer data is relevant.
- **Physical properties beyond MP:** logP, water solubility, and pKa were not found in accessible literature. Storage instability in air (phenol oxidation) is documented [Ref 20].