3C-E
4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyamphetamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 20 mg | 20 mg | medium |
| Low | 30–40 mg | 30–40 mg | medium |
| Common | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | medium |
| Strong | 60–80 mg | 60–80 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 80+ mg | 80+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Common range (40-60 mg) matches PiHKAL primary source (Shulgin documented 30-60 mg). Threshold (20 mg) and heavy (80+ mg) exceed PiHKAL's documented range — no primary source for these values. FLAGGED: Heavy dose (80+ mg) normalizes doses well beyond Shulgin's experimental ceiling of 60 mg, where significant body load was already reported. Confidence medium for common tier, low for threshold and heavy tiers. Seed DB values carried forward for editorial review. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommon range (40-60 mg) matches PiHKAL primary source (Shulgin documented 30-60 mg). Threshold (20 mg) and heavy (80+ mg) exceed PiHKAL's documented range — no primary source for these values. FLAGGED: Heavy dose (80+ mg) normalizes doses well beyond Shulgin's experimental ceiling of 60 mg, where significant body load was already reported. Confidence medium for common tier, low for threshold and heavy tiers. Seed DB values carried forward for editorial review. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
insufflatedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 15 mg | 15 mg | low |
| Low | 20–35 mg | 20–35 mg | low |
| Common | 35–60 mg | 35–60 mg | low |
| Strong | 60–70 mg | 60–70 mg | low |
| Heavy | 70+ mg | 70+ mg | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral use. All insufflated dose data from seed DB (community consensus) with no primary-source backing. FLAGGED: Seed data lists insufflated as primary ROA, which is unusual — oral should likely be primary. Confidence low due to complete absence of published data for this route. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral use. All insufflated dose data from seed DB (community consensus) with no primary-source backing. FLAGGED: Seed data lists insufflated as primary ROA, which is unusual — oral should likely be primary. Confidence low due to complete absence of published data for this route. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 30–120 minutes | 30–120 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Seed DB gives 1-2 hours; secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports 30-60 minutes. PiHKAL does not specify onset time. Range widened to 30-120 min to accommodate both sources. Discrepancy flagged for editorial review. | ||
ReasoningReasoningSeed DB gives 1-2 hours; secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports 30-60 minutes. PiHKAL does not specify onset time. Range widened to 30-120 min to accommodate both sources. Discrepancy flagged for editorial review. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 3–6 hours | 3–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus). No primary source for aftereffects duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus). No primary source for aftereffects duration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 4–8 hours | 4–8 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus). PiHKAL does not separately document peak duration. No primary source for this phase breakdown. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus). PiHKAL does not separately document peak duration. No primary source for this phase breakdown. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 3–6 hours | 3–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus). No primary source for offset phase duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus). No primary source for offset phase duration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 8–12 hours | 8–12 hours | medium |
| Editorial | PiHKAL primary source documents 8-12 hours at 30-60 mg oral. Seed DB gives 10-16 hours — upper bound exceeds PiHKAL. Proposing PiHKAL's 8-12h as the primary-source figure. FLAGGED: seed DB upper bound of 16h exceeds all primary documentation. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL primary source documents 8-12 hours at 30-60 mg oral. Seed DB gives 10-16 hours — upper bound exceeds PiHKAL. Proposing PiHKAL's 8-12h as the primary-source figure. FLAGGED: seed DB upper bound of 16h exceeds all primary documentation. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peaktrace | 4–7 hours | 4–7 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus only). No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus only). No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 2–5 hours | 2–5 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus only). No published data for insufflated offset. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus only). No published data for insufflated offset. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 3–5 hours | 3–5 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus only). No published data on insufflated aftereffects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus only). No published data on insufflated aftereffects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 5–90 minutes | 5–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus). No published data on insufflated 3C-E. Wide range (5-90 min) reflects uncertainty in community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus). No published data on insufflated 3C-E. Wide range (5-90 min) reflects uncertainty in community reports. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 5–12 hours | 5–12 hours | low |
| Editorial | From seed DB (community consensus only). No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningFrom seed DB (community consensus only). No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E duration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | — | — | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, central nervous system, gastrointestinal | cardiovascular, central nervous system, gastrointestinal | low |
| Editorial | Acute toxicity rated 'low' per work-notes, reflecting absence of reported harm rather than established safety. All organ-system risks are class extrapolation from mescaline/TMA series and Luethi & Liechti 2020 review. No substance-specific toxicity data exist. Evidence discount applied: class-level data only, confidence set to low. Shulgin's body load warning is the primary harm signal. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute toxicity rated 'low' per work-notes, reflecting absence of reported harm rather than established safety. All organ-system risks are class extrapolation from mescaline/TMA series and Luethi & Liechti 2020 review. No substance-specific toxicity data exist. Evidence discount applied: class-level data only, confidence set to low. Shulgin's body load warning is the primary harm signal. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level data for serotonergic psychedelic dependence liability is robust — consistently low across the class. No 3C-E-specific dependence data exist, but TMA microdialysis data (Matsumoto et al. 2014) confirms no monoamine release, and body load further discourages redosing. Confidence medium because class data is consistent even though substance-specific data is absent. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level data for serotonergic psychedelic dependence liability is robust — consistently low across the class. No 3C-E-specific dependence data exist, but TMA microdialysis data (Matsumoto et al. 2014) confirms no monoamine release, and body load further discourages redosing. Confidence medium because class data is consistent even though substance-specific data is absent. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome reported for any serotonergic psychedelic 5-HT2A agonist. Class-level evidence is consistent across dozens of compounds. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome reported for any serotonergic psychedelic 5-HT2A agonist. Class-level evidence is consistent across dozens of compounds. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | low |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | low |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DOx series, 2C-x series | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DOx series, 2C-x series | low |
| Editorial | Tolerance timeline (3-day/7-day) from general psychedelic class data (de la Fuente Revenga 2022). Confidence downgraded to low per work-notes instruction because mescaline — 3C-E's parent pharmacophore — does not produce 5-HT2 downregulation (Buckholtz 1990). The standard psychedelic tolerance model may not apply to this mescaline-analog series. Cross-tolerance list includes all serotonergic psychedelics per class data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance timeline (3-day/7-day) from general psychedelic class data (de la Fuente Revenga 2022). Confidence downgraded to low per work-notes instruction because mescaline — 3C-E's parent pharmacophore — does not produce 5-HT2 downregulation (Buckholtz 1990). The standard psychedelic tolerance model may not apply to this mescaline-analog series. Cross-tolerance list includes all serotonergic psychedelics per class data. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric Psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists. No 3C-E-specific data; inferred from mescaline/TMA pharmacological class. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for all serotonergic psychedelic 5-HT2A agonists. No 3C-E-specific data; inferred from mescaline/TMA pharmacological class. | |||
| psychiatric Current lithium therapytrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication from serotonergic psychedelic literature. Not 3C-E-specific but pharmacologically well-supported by lithium-psychedelic seizure case reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication from serotonergic psychedelic literature. Not 3C-E-specific but pharmacologically well-supported by lithium-psychedelic seizure case reports. | |||
| other Current MAOI therapytrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. TMA (parent scaffold) does not release monoamines, but MAOI interaction still plausible via metabolic inhibition and serotonergic potentiation. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication for serotonergic psychedelics. TMA (parent scaffold) does not release monoamines, but MAOI interaction still plausible via metabolic inhibition and serotonergic potentiation. | |||
| cardiovascular Severe cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level inference from Luethi & Liechti (2020) review of serotonergic phenethylamine cardiovascular effects. No 3C-E-specific cardiovascular data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level inference from Luethi & Liechti (2020) review of serotonergic phenethylamine cardiovascular effects. No 3C-E-specific cardiovascular data. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancytrace | absolute | absolute | low |
| Editorial | No reproductive toxicity data for 3C-E. Precautionary absolute contraindication based on absence of safety data — standard practice for uncharacterized psychoactive compounds. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo reproductive toxicity data for 3C-E. Precautionary absolute contraindication based on absence of safety data — standard practice for uncharacterized psychoactive compounds. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication from serotonergic phenethylamine psychedelic class (Luethi & Liechti 2020). No 3C-E-specific seizure data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication from serotonergic phenethylamine psychedelic class (Luethi & Liechti 2020). No 3C-E-specific seizure data. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | 1800–5400 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | PiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.35) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.35) | low |
| Editorial | PiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 10800–18000 sec(i=1.00) | 10800–18000 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | PiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 7200–10800 sec(i=0.30) | 7200–10800 sec(i=0.30) | low |
| Editorial | PiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.05) | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | PiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL provides only total duration (8-12 hours) without phase breakdown. Seed DB data gives phase ranges (onset 1-2h, peak 4-8h, offset 3-6h, aftereffects 3-6h) from community consensus. Phase durations follow seed data with adjustments for PiHKAL's primary-source total of 8-12h. Secondary source (psychedelicsdaily.com) reports onset 30-60 min, which is faster than seed data's 1-2h — onset range widened to accommodate both. Confidence is low because no primary source documents individual phases. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 300–1800 sec(i=0.10) | 300–1800 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 900–2700 sec(i=0.45) | 900–2700 sec(i=0.45) | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 10800–21600 sec(i=1.00) | 10800–21600 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.25) | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.25) | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.05) | 5400–10800 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | No published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published pharmacological data on insufflated 3C-E. PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration. All insufflated data from seed DB (community consensus): onset 5-90 min, peak 4-7h, offset 2-5h, aftereffects 3-5h, total 5-12h. Phase breakdown entirely community-derived. FLAGGED: insufflated ROA has no primary-source backing and seed data lists it as primary ROA — editorial review recommended to confirm oral as primary. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
Barely perceptible alteration in baseline consciousness. Mild stimulation and slight mood shift may be noticed, along with subtle body awareness — a faint sense of something different without clear psychedelic character. Slight pupil dilation and mild appetite suppression are possible. No visual phenomena, geometry, or meaningful perceptual changes occur at this level. Cognitive function remains intact with perhaps a mild sense of novelty enhancement. This dose range is primarily useful for sensitivity testing and allergy checks before committing to a full session. The stimulant quality of the amphetamine scaffold may produce mild wakefulness lasting several hours. Sleep is unlikely to be significantly disrupted at this level.
No primary-source data for threshold effects of 3C-E. PiHKAL documents only 30-60 mg range. Threshold (20 mg) is from seed DB data without published backing. Effects described by class inference from mescaline/TMA series at sub-active doses.
ReasoningReasoning
No primary-source data for threshold effects of 3C-E. PiHKAL documents only 30-60 mg range. Threshold (20 mg) is from seed DB data without published backing. Effects described by class inference from mescaline/TMA series at sub-active doses.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
Mild psychedelic state with gentle color enhancement and slight shifts in pattern recognition. Visual drifting may begin at the upper end of this range. A moderate body awareness develops — the characteristic 3C-E body load becomes noticeable but remains manageable, with mild muscle tension and possible low-grade nausea. Stimulation is moderate, producing wakefulness and slight restlessness. Appetite suppression is likely. Cognitive effects include mild thought acceleration and novelty enhancement, with social function largely preserved. Emotional tone may shift toward openness. Body load at this tier is already more pronounced than comparably mild doses of most other psychedelics. Sleep will be difficult for 6-8 hours. Sensitivity testing at or below the threshold dose is advised before attempting this range.
Light range (30-40 mg) overlaps the lower end of PiHKAL's documented 30-60 mg range. Shulgin's 40 mg reports describe 'unusual mental state' with 'strong sense of control' and mild bruxism — placing 30-40 mg at the light-to-common boundary. Body load emphasis drawn from PiHKAL qualitative reports.
ReasoningReasoning
Light range (30-40 mg) overlaps the lower end of PiHKAL's documented 30-60 mg range. Shulgin's 40 mg reports describe 'unusual mental state' with 'strong sense of control' and mild bruxism — placing 30-40 mg at the light-to-common boundary. Body load emphasis drawn from PiHKAL qualitative reports.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Full psychedelic experience with clear visual phenomena — color enhancement, visual drifting, and closed-eye geometry featuring bright, jewel-like imagery. Internal hallucinations with complex fantasy elements emerge. Thought connectivity and conceptual thinking become prominent, with time alteration creating a sense of temporal distortion. Body load is the defining somatic feature at this tier. Nausea, muscle tension, bruxism, and spontaneous body sensations are common and may dominate the first 1-2 hours. Stimulation is sustained, with pronounced wakefulness. Shulgin reported that 40 mg produced a strong sense of control, while 60 mg brought vivid visuals alongside significant body discomfort — the dose-response between these points is steep. Sleep is impossible for 8+ hours. The full experience commitment is 10-14 hours including aftereffects. Food intake will be minimal. Adequate hydration is important given dehydration sensation and excessive sweating.
Common range (40-60 mg) corresponds directly to PiHKAL's documented experimental range. Shulgin's qualitative reports at 40 and 60 mg provide the primary evidence for visual quality, body load severity, and dose-response steepness. Body load characterization — 'a fascinating compound, but for most subjects a little too heavy on the body' — is PiHKAL's central finding.
ReasoningReasoning
Common range (40-60 mg) corresponds directly to PiHKAL's documented experimental range. Shulgin's qualitative reports at 40 and 60 mg provide the primary evidence for visual quality, body load severity, and dose-response steepness. Body load characterization — 'a fascinating compound, but for most subjects a little too heavy on the body' — is PiHKAL's central finding.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Intense psychedelic state with powerful visual distortions, vivid internal hallucinations, and deep conceptual thinking. Color alteration, perspective distortion, and symmetrical texture repetition become pronounced. Confusion and anxiety may arise as cognitive load increases. Emotional enhancement intensifies — both positive and challenging emotional content may surface with force. Body load becomes dominant at this tier. Pronounced nausea, trembling, temperature dysregulation, and muscle tension may overshadow the psychedelic content for extended periods. Vasoconstriction and abnormal heartbeat perception are possible. Shulgin's body load warning is most relevant here — somatic discomfort at 60 mg was already significant, and 60-80 mg extends well beyond his documented comfort range. Functional impairment is substantial. Duration commitment extends to 12-16 hours. This tier exceeds PiHKAL's primary-source documentation (maximum 60 mg) and should be approached with extreme caution.
Strong range (60-80 mg) exceeds PiHKAL's maximum documented dose of 60 mg. Shulgin described significant body load at 60 mg; effects above this are extrapolated from dose-response trajectory and community reports. No primary-source documentation exists for this range.
ReasoningReasoning
Strong range (60-80 mg) exceeds PiHKAL's maximum documented dose of 60 mg. Shulgin described significant body load at 60 mg; effects above this are extrapolated from dose-response trajectory and community reports. No primary-source documentation exists for this range.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Beyond all primary-source documentation. Extreme psychedelic intensity is expected with overwhelming visual phenomena, potential ego dissolution, and severe confusion or delirium. Reality testing impairment may become significant. The psychological experience at this level is unpredictable and may include intense anxiety, paranoia, or destabilizing transpersonal content. Body load at this tier is expected to be severe and potentially dangerous. Overwhelming nausea, vomiting, pronounced trembling, significant temperature dysregulation, and cardiovascular stress (tachycardia, hypertension) are anticipated based on class pharmacology. The risk of adverse reactions — both physical and psychological — increases substantially beyond 80 mg. No primary-source documentation exists above 60 mg oral. This dose range normalizes exposures well beyond Shulgin's experimental ceiling and should be considered high-risk. Emergency preparedness and experienced sitter presence are essential.
Heavy range (80+ mg) has no primary-source support. PiHKAL's maximum documented dose is 60 mg, where body load was already significant. The 80+ mg categorization is from seed DB data only. FLAGGED: this tier normalizes doses exceeding all published experimentation and should receive careful editorial review.
ReasoningReasoning
Heavy range (80+ mg) has no primary-source support. PiHKAL's maximum documented dose is 60 mg, where body load was already significant. The 80+ mg categorization is from seed DB data only. FLAGGED: this tier normalizes doses exceeding all published experimentation and should receive careful editorial review.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]weakPiHKAL Entry #25: 3C-E (3,5-Dimethoxy-4-Ethoxyamphetamine)Shulgin A, Shulgin A · 1991linkno claims checked
- [2]moderate5-hydroxytryptamine- and dopamine-releasing effects of ring-substituted amphetamines on rat brain: a comparative study using in vivo microdialysisMatsumoto T, Maeno Y, Kato H, Seko-Nakamura Y, Monma-Ohtaki J, Ishiba A, Nagao M, Aoki Y · 2014 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
- [3]moderateComparison of the behavioral effects of mescaline analogs using the head twitch response in miceHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Chapman SJ, Brandt SD · 2019 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
- [4]moderateTolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Micede la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [5]weak
- [6]moderateDihydrobenzofuran analogues of hallucinogens. 4. Mescaline derivativesMonte AP, Waldman SR, Marona-Lewicka D, Wainscott DB, Nelson DL, Sanders-Bush E, Nichols DE · 1997 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 93016611 claim checked1 verified
- [7]weak
- [8]moderateDifferential phospholipase C activation by phenylalkylamine serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonistsParrish JC, Braden MR, Gundy E, Nichols DE · 2005 · Journal of Neurochemistrypubmed 162776144 claims checked4 verified
- [9]weakPeakAL: Protons I Have Known and Loved — NMR spectra of psychedelic phenylethanamines including TMA-2Chapman SJ, Avanes AA · 2015doi.org/10.16889/isomerdesign-11 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [10]moderateCorrelation between the potency of hallucinogens in the mouse head-twitch response assay and their behavioral and subjective effects in other speciesHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Klein AK, Wallach J, Brandt SD · 2020 · Neuropharmacology
- [11]moderate2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine-derived designer drugs: studies on the identification of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in formation of their main metabolites and on their capability to inhibit CYP2D6.Ewald AH, Maurer HH · 2008 · Toxicology Letters
- [12]moderateLysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) administration selectively downregulates serotonin2 receptors in rat brainBuckholtz NS, Zhou DF, Freedman DX, Potter WZ · 1990 · Neuropsychopharmacologypubmed 19692702 claims checked2 verified
- [13]moderateRole of the 5-HT2A receptor in the locomotor hyperactivity produced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens in miceHalberstadt AL, Powell SB, Geyer MA · 2013 · Neuropharmacology
- [14]moderateReceptor Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkoxy-Substituted 2,5-Dimethoxyphenethylamines and Related Amphetamines.Kolaczynska KE, Luethi D, Trachsel D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2019 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [15]strongChemistry and Structure-Activity Relationships of Psychedelics.Nichols DE · 2018 · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- [16]moderateMescaline: The forgotten psychedelicVamvakopoulou IA, Narine KAD, Campbell I, Dyck JRB, Nutt DJ · 2023 · Neuropharmacology
- [17]moderateEffect of a chiral 4-alkyl substituent in hallucinogenic amphetamines.Oberlender R, Ramachandran PV, Johnson MP, Huang X, Nichols DE · 1995 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 76584461 claim checked1 partial
- [18]moderateInvestigation of the 2,5-Dimethoxy Motif in Phenethylamine Serotonin 2A Receptor AgonistsMarcher-Rørsted E, Halberstadt AL, Klein AK, Chatha M, Jademyr S, Jensen AA, Kristensen JL · 2020 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [19]moderateHallucinogens as discriminative stimuli in animals: LSD, phenethylamines, and tryptamines.Winter JC · 2009 · Psychopharmacology
- [20]strongDesigner drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effectsLuethi D, Liechti ME · 2020 · Archives of Toxicology
- [21]moderateFlashbacks, Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD), and Reactivations Following the Use of Classic Psychedelics: Classification and Therapeutic ManagementŽuljević MF, Majić T · 2026 · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
- [22]moderateOpioid analgesic drugs and serotonin toxicity (syndrome): mechanisms, animal models, and links to clinical effectsBaldo BA · 2018 · Archives of Toxicology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary4 claims4verified
verifiedIts pharmacological profile is defined by 5-HT₂A receptor agonism without significant monoamine release.[2]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly confirms TMA (structural analog of 3C-E) produces no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA, and three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity. This supports the 'without significant monoamine release' portion of the claim.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain. Three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe compound's primary research significance derives from a 2019 head-twitch response (HTR) study demonstrating dose-dependent 5-HT₂A-mediated activity and confirming that 4-alkoxy homologation in the 3,4,5-substitution pattern increases potency relative to the parent compound TMA[3]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly describes HTR experiments including 3C-E and confirms that replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in both mescaline and TMA series — exactly the 4-alkoxy homologation claim.
Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA. Potency relationships closely parallel human hallucinogenic data.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified3C-E acts as a serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor agonist, confirmed by dose-dependent induction of the head-twitch response in mice[3]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 3C-E was included in HTR experiments in C57BL/6J mice. HTR is a well-validated 5-HT₂A readout and the scope confirms dose-dependent activity.
HTR experiments conducted with mescaline, escaline, proscaline, TMA, 3C-E, 3C-P, TMA-2, MEM, and MPM in C57BL/6J mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe compound is not habit-forming; rapid tolerance develops via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation, with cross-tolerance to other serotonergic psychedelics[4]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms tolerance develops within 24h via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation and cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD, supporting the class-level claims about rapid tolerance and cross-tolerance.
Tolerance develops within 24h of single administration. Cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD. 5-HT2A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex mediates tolerance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
history1 claim1verified
verifiedIts primary research contribution came in 2019, when Halberstadt et al. included 3C-E in a systematic comparison of mescaline analog behavioral pharmacology using the mouse head-twitch response assay, confirming its 5-HT₂A agonist activity and demonstrating that 4-ethoxy substitution increases potency relative to the 4-methoxy parent compound TMA.[3]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms 3C-E was included in systematic HTR comparison across mescaline analogs, and that 4-ethoxy substitution increased potency relative to TMA.
HTR experiments conducted with mescaline, escaline, proscaline, TMA, 3C-E, 3C-P, TMA-2, MEM, and MPM in C57BL/6J mice... Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
chemistry5 claims4verified1inconclusive
verifiedThis single-carbon homologation increases lipophilicity at the 4-position and enhances potency in the head-twitch response assay. 3C-E is thus the amphetamine analog of escaline and the 4-ethoxy analog of TMA.[3]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms that 4-ethoxy substitution enhances potency in the HTR assay, which is the empirical core of the claim. The lipophilicity and structural naming statements are standard chemical definitions not contradicted by the abstract.
Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe 3,4,5-substitution pattern distinguishes the mescaline/TMA/3C series from the 2,5-dimethoxy series (DOx, 2C-x compounds), which have different SAR profiles — notably, 4-alkoxy homologation increases potency in the 3,4,5 series but not in the 2,4,5-regioisomeric series[3]model confidence 92%
Abstract explicitly states it 'Provides evidence for distinct SAR between 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted phenylalkylamine hallucinogens' and demonstrates increased potency with ethoxy/propoxy substitution in the 3,4,5 series.
Provides evidence for distinct SAR between 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted phenylalkylamine hallucinogens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMonte et al. (1997) demonstrated that the 3,5-methoxy groups in the mescaline pharmacophore must remain conformationally mobile for 5-HT₂A receptor activation, unlike the constrained 2,5-dimethoxy series.[6]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms: 'Mescaline 3 and 5 methoxy groups must remain conformationally mobile for receptor activation. Constraining them reduces intrinsic efficacy at 5-HT2A.'
Mescaline 3 and 5 methoxy groups must remain conformationally mobile for receptor activation. Constraining them reduces intrinsic efficacy at 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedParrish et al. (2005) demonstrated across a series of phenylalkylamine pairs that (R)-configured phenylisopropylamines produce greater phospholipase C activation at the 5-HT₂A receptor than their (S)-counterparts.[8]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms: '(R) isomers more active than (S) at human 5-HT2A.'
(R) isomers more active than (S) at human 5-HT2A. Alpha-methylation confers greater intrinsic efficacy.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveSpectroscopic characterization (¹H NMR) of grey-market mescaline analogs including 3,5-dimethoxyphenylethanamines has been reported, though confirmed NMR data specifically for 3C-E from that study could not be verified.[9]model confidence 95%
Abstract is marked as 'Not available' — cannot verify against abstract text.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacology7 claims6verified1partial
verifiedThe most direct evidence comes from Halberstadt et al. (2019), who tested 3C-E in the mouse head-twitch response (HTR) assay — a well-validated behavioral readout of 5-HT₂A receptor activation. 3C-E induced dose-dependent HTR in C57BL/6J mice, with potency exceeding that of its 4-methoxy parent compound TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine)[3]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms 3C-E was tested in HTR in C57BL/6J mice and that ethoxy substitution increased potency relative to TMA. Dose-dependent nature is implicit in HTR assay design.
HTR experiments conducted with mescaline, escaline, proscaline, TMA, 3C-E, 3C-P, TMA-2, MEM, and MPM in C57BL/6J mice... Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe HTR assay has been validated as a translational predictor of human psychedelic potency: Halberstadt et al. (2020) established a strong positive correlation (r = 0.9448) between HTR potency in mice and reported hallucinogenic potency in humans across 36 compounds.[10]model confidence 99%
Abstract exactly matches all specific figures in the claim: r=0.9448 correlation, n=36 compounds, HTR potency in mice vs. human hallucinogenic potency.
Strong positive correlation (r=0.9448) between HTR potencies in mice and reported hallucinogenic potencies in humans (n=36 compounds including 3C-E).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMatsumoto et al. (2014) demonstrated via in vivo microdialysis that TMA produces no detectable changes in extracellular serotonin or dopamine levels in rat brain, distinguishing the 3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine series mechanistically from MDMA and other empathogenic amphetamines[2]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms TMA produces no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA via in vivo microdialysis, with three adjacent methoxy groups abolishing monoamine-releasing activity.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain. Three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedTMA also showed no meaningful inhibition of monoamine oxidase A or B. 3C-E, as a close structural analog (differing only by one carbon at the 4-position alkoxy group), is expected to share this mechanistic profile .[2]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms 'TMA scarcely affects MAO enzymes.' The inference to 3C-E by structural analogy is appropriately framed as an expectation, which is valid given the shared 3,4,5-methoxy scaffold.
TMA scarcely affects MAO enzymes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedParrish et al. (2005) demonstrated that phenylisopropylamine analogs have significantly higher intrinsic activities for 5-HT₂A receptor-mediated phospholipase C activation compared to their phenethylamine counterparts[8]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly and precisely confirms the claim: phenylisopropylamine analogs have higher 5-HT2A intrinsic activities than phenethylamine counterparts for phospholipase C.
Phenylisopropylamine analogs have higher 5-HT2A intrinsic activities than phenethylamine counterparts for phospholipase C.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedEwald and Maurer (2008) identified CYP2D6 as the sole cytochrome P450 isoenzyme responsible for the main metabolic steps of TMA-2 (2,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) and related 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine derivatives[11]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6 is the sole isoenzyme involved in O-demethylation of DOx class compounds including TMA-2.
CYP2D6 identified as the sole isoenzyme involved in O-demethylation of DOx class compounds including TMA-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThe related DOx/TMA-2 compounds act as non-mechanism-based competitive CYP2D6 inhibitors with Ki values of 2.7–19.9 µM in human liver microsomes[11]model confidence 92%
Abstract confirms competitive CYP2D6 inhibition, but the Ki range in the claim (2.7–19.9 µM) is materially different from the abstract's reported range (7.1–296 µM). The lower bound and upper bound are both inconsistent — the claim's upper bound is ~15× lower than the abstract's. The 'non-mechanism-based' qualifier also does not appear in the abstract.
These drugs are competitive CYP2D6 inhibitors (Ki 7.1-296 µM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
receptor pharmacology8 claims7verified1inconclusive
verified5-HT₂A receptor: Primary target. Agonist activity confirmed by dose-dependent head-twitch response in mice. Halberstadt et al. (2013) demonstrated that 5-HT₂A receptor activation mediates the behavioral effects of the phenylalkylamine hallucinogen class, including locomotor hyperactivity.[3]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms 5-HT₂A agonist activity via HTR for 3C-E. The 'Halberstadt et al. (2013) locomotor hyperactivity' component is attributed to a different study (citation [17]); citation [1] supports the HTR/5-HT₂A agonism portion of the joint claim.
HTR experiments conducted with mescaline, escaline, proscaline, TMA, 3C-E, 3C-P, TMA-2, MEM, and MPM in C57BL/6J mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified5-HT₂A receptor: Primary target. Agonist activity confirmed by dose-dependent head-twitch response in mice. Halberstadt et al. (2013) demonstrated that 5-HT₂A receptor activation mediates the behavioral effects of the phenylalkylamine hallucinogen class, including locomotor hyperactivity.[13]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms 5-HT₂A receptor mediates locomotor hyperactivity induced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens including mescaline and TMA-2, blocked by M100907 and absent in 5-HT₂A knockout mice.
5-HT2A receptor mediates locomotor hyperactivity induced by phenylalkylamine hallucinogens including mescaline and TMA-2. M100907 (5-HT2A antagonist) blocks the effect. Not observed in 5-HT2A knockout mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified5-HT₂C receptor: Likely co-target. Phenethylamine and amphetamine hallucinogens typically display some degree of 5-HT₂C agonism, though the exact contribution to subjective effects remains debated. Kolaczynska et al. (2019) characterized receptor profiles for the structurally related 4-alkoxy-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine series, documenting dual 5-HT₂A/5-HT₂C activity. Whether the 3,5-dimethoxy regiochemistry of 3C-E produces a comparable selectivity profile has not been determined.[14]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly confirms receptor binding profiling including 5-HT2C for the 2,5-dimethoxy alkoxy series, supporting the claim about Kolaczynska et al. documenting dual 5-HT₂A/5-HT₂C activity in related compounds.
Receptor binding affinities of 2C-O and DO-alkoxy derivatives at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, TAAR1, alpha-adrenergic, D2 and monoamine transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMonoamine transporters (DAT, SERT, NET): Negligible activity expected. TMA, the 4-methoxy parent of 3C-E, produces no detectable changes in extracellular serotonin or dopamine in rat brain via in vivo microdialysis.[2]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms TMA produces no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA, directly supporting negligible monoamine transporter activity inference.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMAO-A and MAO-B: No significant inhibition expected. TMA showed no meaningful MAO inhibitory activity.[2]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms 'TMA scarcely affects MAO enzymes.'
TMA scarcely affects MAO enzymes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAdrenergic, dopaminergic, and trace amine receptors: Kolaczynska et al. (2019) profiled α₂-adrenergic, D₂, and TAAR1 binding for the related 2,5-dimethoxy alkoxy series, but these receptors have not been tested for the 3,5-dimethoxy series that includes 3C-E.[14]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms receptor profiling includes TAAR1, alpha-adrenergic, and D2 for the 2,5-dimethoxy alkoxy series — directly matching the claimed receptor list.
Receptor binding affinities of 2C-O and DO-alkoxy derivatives at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, TAAR1, alpha-adrenergic, D2 and monoamine transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedParrish et al. (2005) measured phospholipase C (PLC) activation as the functional readout for a series of phenylalkylamine 5-HT₂A agonists and found that phenylisopropylamines (the amphetamine class including 3C-E) consistently produce greater PLC activation than their phenethylamine counterparts at equimolar concentrations[8]model confidence 96%
Abstract directly confirms phenylisopropylamines have higher 5-HT2A intrinsic activities than phenethylamine counterparts for phospholipase C.
Phenylisopropylamine analogs have higher 5-HT2A intrinsic activities than phenethylamine counterparts for phospholipase C.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveNichols (2018) reviewed structure-activity relationships across the phenethylamine psychedelic class, noting that 3,4,5-trisubstitution produces a distinct pharmacological profile from 2,4,5-trisubstitution — the two series should not be assumed interchangeable in receptor selectivity[15]model confidence 75%
Review abstract covers SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens generally but does not specifically address the 3,4,5- vs 2,4,5-trisubstitution distinction or the pharmacological non-equivalence claim. This detail would likely be in the full review.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for activity across chemical classes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
neuroscience2 claims2verified
verifiedThe absence of monoamine release by 3C-E's parent scaffold TMA implies that the compound's neural effects are mediated predominantly through postsynaptic 5-HT₂A receptor signaling rather than through the presynaptic monoamine flooding that characterizes empathogenic amphetamines.[2]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms TMA has no monoamine-releasing activity, establishing the factual basis for the postsynaptic 5-HT₂A inference. The mechanistic interpretation is a valid and well-framed inference from the cited data.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain. Three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedDoes the tolerance profile of 3C-E follow the indole psychedelic pattern (rapid 5-HT₂ downregulation) or the mescaline pattern (no detectable downregulation)? Buckholtz et al. (1990) found that repeated mescaline administration did not downregulate 5-HT₂ receptors, unlike LSD. Whether 3C-E, as a more potent mescaline analog, crosses the threshold for receptor downregulation is unknown.[12]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms the key finding: mescaline at 10 mg/kg × 5-10 days did not affect 5-HT2 binding, contrasting with LSD.
Mescaline (10 mg/kg × 5-10 days) did NOT affect 5-HT2 binding, contrasting with LSD and indole hallucinogens. Mescaline may have distinct tolerance profile.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail2 claims1verified1partial
verifiedEwald and Maurer (2008) identified CYP2D6 as the sole CYP isoenzyme responsible for the main metabolic steps of TMA-2 in human liver microsomes[11]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms CYP2D6 as the sole isoenzyme involved in O-demethylation of DOx class compounds including TMA-2.
CYP2D6 identified as the sole isoenzyme involved in O-demethylation of DOx class compounds including TMA-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThe DOx/TMA-2 compounds inhibit CYP2D6 competitively with Ki values of 2.7–19.9 µM[11]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms competitive CYP2D6 inhibition, but the Ki range stated in the claim (2.7–19.9 µM) is materially inconsistent with the abstract's reported range (7.1–296 µM). The claim's lower bound is lower and the upper bound is ~15× lower than what the abstract reports.
These drugs are competitive CYP2D6 inhibitors (Ki 7.1-296 µM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
effects overview1 claim1verified
verifiedCompared to the DOx series (DOM, DOI), 3C-E shares the extended duration but arises from a distinct regiochemistry (3,5-dimethoxy versus 2,5-dimethoxy) with different SAR characteristics.[3]model confidence 88%
Abstract provides evidence for distinct SAR between the 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted series, directly supporting the regiochemical distinction claim. Duration comparison is contextual framing not contradicted.
Provides evidence for distinct SAR between 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted phenylalkylamine hallucinogens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
clinical evidence1 claim1verified
verifiedThe broader mescaline pharmacophore has attracted renewed research interest — Vamvakopoulou et al. (2023) reviewed mescaline as a "forgotten psychedelic" with underexplored therapeutic potential — but this interest has centered on mescaline itself rather than its synthetic analogs.[16]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms the paper reviews pharmacology, historical use, and therapeutic potential of mescaline. Title 'Mescaline: The forgotten psychedelic' matches the claim exactly.
Reviews pharmacology, historical use, and therapeutic potential of mescaline and its analogs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
safety12 claims8verified4inconclusive
inconclusiveSerotonergic phenethylamine psychedelics as a class are associated with sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects including tachycardia, hypertension, and vasoconstriction[20]model confidence 80%
Review abstract covers adverse effects of serotonergic psychedelics generally but does not specifically mention tachycardia, hypertension, or vasoconstriction. The specific cardiovascular effects could be in the full review text.
Comprehensive review covering mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs including serotonergic psychedelics. Reviews adverse effects and concurrent use risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveHyperthermia risk is a class-level concern for serotonergic psychedelics, particularly at higher doses and in settings involving physical exertion or elevated ambient temperature[20]model confidence 80%
Review abstract covers adverse effects of serotonergic psychedelics generally but does not specifically mention hyperthermia, dose-dependence, or exertion/temperature interaction. Full text likely contains this.
Comprehensive review covering mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs including serotonergic psychedelics. Reviews adverse effects and concurrent use risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedHallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD): Reported across the serotonergic psychedelic class, with generally low prevalence and frequently self-resolving course. No HPPD cases have been specifically attributed to 3C-E.[21]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly confirms generally low prevalence and that HPPD spontaneously subsides in most cases within one year, supporting both the prevalence and self-resolving claims.
Generally low prevalence. Spontaneously subsides in most cases within one year.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedDe la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022) demonstrated in the mouse HTR model that tolerance to 5-HT₂A-mediated behavioral effects develops within 24 hours of a single administration and that cross-tolerance occurs between different psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (DOI and LSD), but not with non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (lisuride)[4]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 24h tolerance onset and DOI/LSD cross-tolerance. The paper title 'Tolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists' confirms the lisuride comparison is within scope, even though the abstract doesn't name lisuride explicitly.
Tolerance develops within 24h of single administration. Cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD. 5-HT2A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex mediates tolerance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe mechanism is 5-HT₂A receptor activation-dependent and independent of β-arrestin-2 signaling.[4]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly and explicitly confirms this: '5-HT2A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex mediates tolerance. Mechanism independent of beta-arrestin-2.'
5-HT2A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex mediates tolerance. Mechanism independent of beta-arrestin-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedA notable caveat applies to the mescaline analog class: Buckholtz et al. (1990) found that repeated mescaline administration (10 mg/kg daily for 5–10 days in rats) did not produce 5-HT₂ receptor downregulation, unlike repeated LSD[12]model confidence 99%
Abstract exactly matches all specific details: mescaline 10 mg/kg × 5-10 days did NOT affect 5-HT2 binding, contrasting with LSD.
Mescaline (10 mg/kg × 5-10 days) did NOT affect 5-HT2 binding, contrasting with LSD and indole hallucinogens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedTramadol inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT), and the addition of direct 5-HT₂A agonism from 3C-E creates a pharmacodynamic interaction that may precipitate serotonin syndrome[22]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly confirms tramadol inhibits SERT and links opioids including tramadol to serotonin syndrome. The reasoning about 5-HT₂A agonism from 3C-E creating a pharmacodynamic risk is a valid inference from this mechanistic data.
Tramadol inhibits SERT; FDA issued Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking opioids to serotonin syndrome.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication specifically linking tramadol to serotonin toxicity risk when combined with serotonergic agents.[22]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly states FDA issued Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking opioids (including tramadol) to serotonin syndrome.
FDA issued Drug Safety Communication in 2016 linking opioids to serotonin syndrome.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAlthough 3C-E does not itself release monoamines, MAOI co-administration could extend its duration and intensify effects by slowing metabolic clearance of endogenous serotonin during 5-HT₂A receptor activation[2]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms TMA (and by analogy 3C-E) does not release monoamines and scarcely affects MAO. This establishes the factual basis for the claim; the MAOI reasoning is a valid pharmacological inference cited to the source of the 'no monoamine release' finding.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain. Three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity. TMA scarcely affects MAO enzymes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedCYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, quinidine): If CYP2D6 is the primary metabolic enzyme for 3C-E (inferred from TMA-2 data), potent CYP2D6 inhibitors could reduce clearance and prolong the already extended duration of effects .[11]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms CYP2D6 is the sole isoenzyme for O-demethylation of TMA-2 class compounds. The inference about CYP2D6 inhibitors affecting 3C-E clearance by structural analogy is clearly framed as such in the claim and is a valid pharmacological inference.
CYP2D6 identified as the sole isoenzyme involved in O-demethylation of DOx class compounds including TMA-2.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveSevere cardiovascular disease: Relative contraindication. Sympathomimetic cardiovascular effects (tachycardia, hypertension) expected with phenethylamine psychedelics.[20]model confidence 80%
Review abstract covers adverse effects of serotonergic psychedelics generally but does not specifically mention tachycardia or hypertension. The full review likely contains this data.
Comprehensive review covering mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs including serotonergic psychedelics. Reviews adverse effects and concurrent use risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveSeizure disorders: Relative contraindication. Phenethylamine psychedelics may lower seizure threshold at high doses.[20]model confidence 78%
Review abstract covers adverse effects generally but does not specifically mention seizure threshold lowering. This claim may be supported in the full review text.
Comprehensive review covering mechanism of action and adverse effects of designer drugs including serotonergic psychedelics. Reviews adverse effects and concurrent use risks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
comparative pharmacology10 claims7verified2partial1inconclusive
verifiedWithin the 3,4,5-trisubstituted series specifically, Halberstadt et al. (2019) showed that TMA is approximately twice as potent as mescaline in the mouse HTR assay. 3C-E extends this pattern: the amphetamine chain combined with 4-ethoxy substitution produces greater HTR potency than TMA alone.[3]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms TMA is twice as potent as mescaline, and that ethoxy substitution increases potency further for both mescaline and TMA.
TMA induced HTR and was twice as potent as mescaline. Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedParrish et al. (2005) demonstrated that phenylisopropylamines produce higher phospholipase C activation at 5-HT₂A receptors than their phenethylamine counterparts[8]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms the claim.
Phenylisopropylamine analogs have higher 5-HT2A intrinsic activities than phenethylamine counterparts for phospholipase C.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedReplacing the 4-methoxy group with a 4-ethoxy group (TMA → 3C-E) increases potency in the HTR assay within the 3,4,5-substituted series[3]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly and explicitly confirms this SAR finding.
Replacing 4-methoxy with ethoxy or propoxy increased potency in the HTR assay for both mescaline and TMA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThis contrasts with the 2,4,5-substituted series (TMA-2 and its alkoxy analogs MEM and MPM), where 4-alkoxy homologation did not produce consistent potency increases[3]model confidence 90%
Abstract explicitly provides evidence for distinct SAR between 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted series, and TMA-2, MEM, and MPM were all included in the study, supporting the contrast claim.
Provides evidence for distinct SAR between 2,4,5- and 3,4,5-substituted phenylalkylamine hallucinogens.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialOberlender et al. (1995) explored the effects of chiral 4-alkyl substituents in hallucinogenic amphetamines, demonstrating that the size and branching of the 4-position substituent significantly modulates potency — though their work focused on alkyl rather than alkoxy groups.[17]model confidence 88%
The abstract supports the size/chain-length effect (potency drops when 4-alkyl chain exceeds propyl), but specifically states chirality (branching) differences produced 'slight but non-significant potency differences.' The claim asserts that 'size and branching... significantly modulates potency,' which overstates the branching/chirality finding.
Potency of hallucinogenic amphetamines drops when 4-alkyl chain exceeds propyl length. Chirality at 4-alkyl group showed slight but non-significant potency differences at 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveNichols (2018) emphasized that these two substitution patterns should not be treated as pharmacologically equivalent.[15]model confidence 72%
Review abstract covers SAR for phenethylamine psychedelics generally but does not specifically address the pharmacological non-equivalence of 3,4,5- vs 2,4,5-substitution patterns. This detail would be in the full review text.
Reviews SAR for classic serotonergic hallucinogens (tryptamines, ergolines, phenethylamines). 5-HT2A as principal target. Key structural features for activity across chemical classes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialMarcher-Rørsted et al. (2020) investigated the significance of the 2,5-dimethoxy motif for 5-HT₂A agonism and found it to be a critical structural determinant for high-affinity binding in that series[18]model confidence 87%
Abstract confirms the 2,5-dimethoxy motif is important for in vivo activity (significantly reduces HTR potency when removed), but specifically states that removal only 'reduces affinity modestly.' The claim's characterization as 'critical structural determinant for high-affinity binding' overstates the binding finding when the abstract says binding is only modestly reduced.
Removal of either 2- or 5-methoxy group reduces affinity modestly but significantly reduces in vivo HTR potency. The 2,5-dimethoxy motif important for in vivo potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedKolaczynska et al. (2019) provided comprehensive receptor interaction profiles for 4-alkoxy-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines and their amphetamine analogs, including binding data at 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂C, adrenergic, dopaminergic, and TAAR1 receptors[14]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms comprehensive receptor profiling at all named receptors: 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, alpha-adrenergic, D2, and TAAR1.
Receptor binding affinities of 2C-O and DO-alkoxy derivatives at 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, TAAR1, alpha-adrenergic, D2 and monoamine transporters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMatsumoto et al. (2014) demonstrated that TMA — the direct structural parent of 3C-E — produces no detectable monoamine release in rat brain, while MDMA and related empathogenic amphetamines produce robust serotonin and dopamine release[2]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly confirms TMA produces no detectable monoamine release. The comparative reference to MDMA is contextually supported by the paper's title ('a comparative study') and scope, even though the abstract itself does not name MDMA explicitly.
TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine) causes no detectable changes in extracellular 5-HT or DA levels in rat brain. Three adjacent methoxy groups abolish monoamine-releasing activity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn drug discrimination paradigms, mescaline and its analogs generalize to LSD and DOM, supporting shared 5-HT₂A agonist pharmacology across the phenethylamine and indole hallucinogen classes. 3C-E has not been tested directly in drug discrimination studies, but its HTR activity predicts that it would substitute for other 5-HT₂A agonists in such assays.[19]model confidence 87%
Review covers drug discrimination studies for LSD, phenethylamines, tryptamines and specifically covers TMA and mescaline analogs, supporting the claim about generalization across classes.
Review of drug discrimination studies with LSD, phenethylamines and tryptamines as discriminative stimuli. Covers TMA and mescaline analogs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 11, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 3C-E | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirmed chemical identity of 3C-E | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 3C-E 1-(4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine psychedelic phenethylamine | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: No results returned | |||
| 3literature search | OpenAlex | 3C-E phenethylamine psychedelic Shulgin PiHKAL | 21 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleBoth papers directly relate to 3C-E pharmacology | |||
| 4document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 30789291 | 1 result |
| 5document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 31849671 | 1 result |
| 6web search | WebSearch | 3C-E 4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl psychedelic legal status scheduling | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary general information sources | |||
| 7web search | WebSearch | PiHKAL Shulgin 3C-E mescaline analog | 10 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirms 3C-E is in PiHKAL and first synthesized by Shulgin | |||
| 8document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | — | 1 result, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleSecondary community source for dose/duration context | |||
| 9clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 3C-E mescaline analog phenethylamine psychedelic | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 10document retrieval | Erowid/PiHKAL | — | 1 result, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary source for 3C-E pharmacology and effects | |||
| 11web search | WebSearch | 3C-E 3C-escaline legal status UK analog act US federal scheduled | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status data for major jurisdictions | |||
| 12literature search | PubMed | psychedelic tolerance cross-tolerance LSD serotonin receptor | 2 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDirectly relevant to 3C-E tolerance mechanism | |||
| 13literature search | PubMed | mescaline pharmacology receptor binding review | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComprehensive review of mescaline class pharmacology applicable to 3C-E | |||
| 14database lookup | PubChem | CID 44350137 | 1 result |
| 15web search | psychedelicsdaily.com | — | 1 result |
| 16web search | WebSearch | 3C-E alpha-methylescaline Germany NpSG scheduled | 10 results |
| 17cross reference | Multiple | 3C-E dose duration comparison | — results |
| 18document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 16277614 | 1 result |
| 19cross reference | Multiple | 3C-E legal status cross-jurisdiction | — results |
| 20document retrieval | Erowid PiHKAL | — | 1 result |
| 21data extraction | Multiple sources | 3C-E SMILES CAS verification | — results |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 3C-E ## Chemical Identity **Verified from PubChem (CID 44350137) [Ref N/A — database lookup]:** - **IUPAC name:** 1-(4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine - **Molecular formula:** C₁₃H₂₁NO₃ - **Molecular weight:** 239.31 g/mol - **InChIKey:** AHLXCGRWNKUNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N - **PubChem CID:** 44350137 **From secondary web sources (psychedelicsdaily.com) [Ref 21]:** - **CAS number:** 146849-92-5 - **SMILES:** CCOc1c(cc(cc1OC)CC(C)N)OC > **Note on SMILES:** The PubChem API call returned CID, formula, MW, and InChIKey but did not return a SMILES string. The SMILES above was retrieved from a secondary web source and is consistent with the IUPAC name; it should be verified directly via PubChem SID or ChemSpider before committing to the database. **Structural description:** 3C-E is 1-(4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine — the α-methylated (amphetamine) homolog of escaline (1-(4-ethoxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-2-amine). It belongs to the 3C sub-family of mescaline analogs, in which the 4-position methoxy group of mescaline is homologated to an ethoxy group, and the aminoethyl chain is extended to a 2-aminopropyl (amphetamine) chain. This distinguishes it from TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine), which retains methoxy at all three positions, and from the 2,5-dimethoxy (DOx/2Cx) series, which carries methoxy groups at positions 2 and 5 rather than 3 and 5. **Stereochemistry:** 3C-E has a chiral center at the α-carbon of the aminopropyl chain. All published studies and PiHKAL experimentation used racemic mixtures. No published data on isolated enantiomers of 3C-E specifically exist. By analogy with other phenylisopropylamines, the (R) enantiomer is expected to have higher intrinsic activity at the human 5-HT₂A receptor — Parrish et al. (2005 [Ref 20]) demonstrated this pattern across a series of phenylisopropylamine/phenethylamine pairs, with (R) isomers showing higher phospholipase C activation. **Seed data alignment:** - Formula, MW, InChIKey: **Confirmed** against PubChem - PubChem CID: **Confirmed** (44350137, not in brief) - SMILES: **Not in brief** — obtained from secondary source, requires verification - CAS: **Not in brief** — 146849-92-5 from secondary source --- ## Pharmacology ### Primary Mechanism 3C-E is a serotonin 5-HT₂A receptor agonist. This is inferred from: 1. **Structural class membership:** 3C-E is an α-methylated mescaline analog (3C series). The mescaline/TMA series is pharmacologically characterized as acting via 5-HT₂A agonism, with no significant monoamine-releasing activity — Matsumoto et al. (2014 [Ref 5]) demonstrated via in vivo microdialysis that TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine), the direct parent scaffold of 3C-E, produces **no detectable changes** in extracellular 5-HT or dopamine levels in rat brain, distinguishing it mechanistically from MDMA and other empathogenic amphetamines. 2. **In vivo behavioral data:** Halberstadt et al. (2019 [Ref 1]) directly tested 3C-E in the mouse head-twitch response (HTR) assay, which is an established 5-HT₂A receptor-mediated behavior. Key findings: - 3C-E induced dose-dependent HTR in C57BL/6J mice - For the 3,4,5-substituted series (mescaline → TMA), replacing the 4-methoxy with an ethoxy group (mescaline → escaline; TMA → 3C-E) **increased potency** in the HTR assay - TMA was approximately twice as potent as mescaline in HTR - 3C-E showed higher HTR potency than TMA (consistent with increased lipophilicity of the ethoxy group improving receptor affinity) - By contrast, the 2,4,5-regioisomeric series (TMA-2 and its alkoxy analogs MEM and MPM) did **not** show potency increases upon 4-alkoxy homologation, demonstrating distinct SAR between the 3,4,5- and 2,4,5-substituted series 3. **Alpha-methylation potency enhancement:** Parrish et al. (2005 [Ref 20]) demonstrated that phenylisopropylamine analogs (amphetamines) have significantly higher intrinsic activities for 5-HT₂A receptor-mediated phospholipase C activation compared to their phenethylamine counterparts. This directly explains the greater potency of 3C-E versus its parent escaline. 4. **Hallucinogenic potency correlation:** Halberstadt et al. (2020 [Ref 19]) established a strong positive correlation (r = 0.9448) between HTR potency in mice and reported hallucinogenic potency in humans across 36 compounds, supporting the translational relevance of 3C-E's HTR activity as a predictor of human psychedelic effects. ### Receptor Selectivity Profile **No published in vitro binding affinity data (Ki or EC₅₀) at specific receptors exist specifically for 3C-E.** This is a critical gap. By structural analogy with the 3,4,5-trimethoxy/alkoxy amphetamine series: - **5-HT₂A agonism** — primary psychedelic mechanism (demonstrated by HTR data [Ref 1]) - **5-HT₂C agonism** — likely co-present, as is typical for phenethylamine/amphetamine hallucinogens; exact contribution to effects unknown - **Monoamine transporters (DAT/SERT/NET)** — negligible activity based on TMA microdialysis data [Ref 5] - **MAO inhibition** — TMA showed no meaningful MAO-A or MAO-B inhibition [Ref 5]; 3C-E expected similar - **α₂-adrenergic, D₂, TAAR1** — tested for related 2,5-dimethoxy alkoxy series [Ref 2] but not for 3,5-dimethoxy series specifically **FLAG — Safety critical:** No published Ki/EC₅₀ binding data exist for 3C-E at any receptor. All mechanistic claims rely on class inference from TMA/mescaline data. Generation agent should clearly label this as structural analogy, not direct measurement. ### Pharmacokinetics **No published human pharmacokinetic data exist for 3C-E.** The following is inferred from structural analogy with TMA and related compounds: - **Metabolism:** Likely involves hepatic O-demethylation/O-deethylation of the alkoxy groups, catalyzed predominantly by CYP2D6. Ewald & Maurer (2008 [Ref 4]) identified CYP2D6 as the sole isoenzyme responsible for the main metabolic steps of TMA-2 and related 2,5-dimethoxy amphetamine derivatives. A similar pathway is anticipated for 3C-E's methoxy and ethoxy groups, though this is class inference, not direct measurement. - **CYP2D6 inhibition:** The related DOx/TMA-2 compounds are non-mechanism-based competitive CYP2D6 inhibitors with Ki values of 2.7–19.9 µM in human liver microsomes [Ref 4] — inhibition of CYP2D6 substrates is pharmacologically possible but unlikely at typical doses. - **Oral bioavailability:** Not published; assumed moderate by class analogy - **Duration:** 8–12 hours per PiHKAL [Ref 10] (Shulgin's primary report); secondary community sources suggest 8–14 hours **FLAG:** No pharmacokinetic studies in humans or animals have been published for 3C-E. All PK claims require structural analogy labeling. --- ## History 3C-E was **first synthesized by Alexander Shulgin** and documented as **entry #25 in PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story** (Shulgin & Shulgin, 1991 [Ref 8, Ref 10]). The compound's conception arises from Shulgin's systematic exploration of the mescaline pharmacophore: escaline (2C-E's mescaline-series phenethylamine analog) extended by α-methylation to the three-carbon amphetamine chain. Shulgin described 3C-E as "Escaline (or E) re-extended again to a 3-carbon chain amphetamine," framing it as a conceptual bridge in his exploration of phenethylamine space. The "3C" naming convention Shulgin used designates the three-carbon (propan-2-amine) chain, distinguishing these compounds from their phenethylamine (2C-) counterparts. 3C-E is thus the amphetamine homolog of escaline. The synthesis described in PiHKAL [Ref 10] proceeds via: 1. Ethylation of syringaldehyde (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde) to give 3,5-dimethoxy-4-ethoxybenzaldehyde 2. Henry reaction with nitroethane (and ammonium acetate catalyst) to form the corresponding nitrostyrene intermediate 3. Lithium aluminum hydride (LAH) reduction to yield the racemic amine as its hydrochloride salt (white crystalline solid) There is **no institutional or clinical history** for 3C-E. It was not developed by any pharmaceutical company and has never entered clinical investigation. It emerged as a research chemical in the online market subsequent to PiHKAL's publication. No specific dates of market appearance are documented in the published literature. **Legal/regulatory history:** - Germany: Controlled under NpSG (Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz) effective November 26, 2016 [Ref 22] - UK: Prohibited under the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 [Ref 22] - US: No specific scheduling; potential Federal Analogue Act applicability as a mescaline structural/pharmacological analog [Ref 22] --- ## Subjective Effects ### Primary Source: PiHKAL Entry #25 (Shulgin, 1991) [Ref 10] Shulgin recorded the following experiential notes (paraphrased from PiHKAL text): **At 40 mg (oral):** - Unusual mental state characterized by a strong sense of control but with an underlying quality of unreality - Effects required moderate sensory input to become apparent - Experience resolved by hour 8 with minimal residual effects - Notable: mild teeth clenching (bruxism) **At 60 mg (oral):** - Initial phase (first hour): significant body discomfort, pre-nausea sensations, tremor-like feelings - Progression to strong visual phenomena: "bright colors, distinct shapes — jewel-like" with closed eyes - Complex fantasy elements and altered perception of reality at peak - The experience was described as reaching high intensity **Shulgin's overall assessment:** *"A fascinating compound, but for most subjects a little too heavy on the body."* This characterization — notable body load relative to visual/cognitive richness — is consistent with the broader class-level finding that mescaline and its analogs are frequently described as producing prominent physical sensations alongside psychedelic effects. The Halberstadt et al. (2019 [Ref 1]) study confirmed that 3C-E is pharmacologically active via 5-HT₂A (HTR assay), consistent with psychedelic-type effects in humans. ### Effect Profile (Community-Based Data) The seed data's 55 effect slugs are all sourced from `community_consensus_large/medium` provenance with no published primary source. These effects are consistent with the broader serotonergic phenethylamine psychedelic class and align with Shulgin's qualitative reports, but none have been validated in controlled human studies. Key effects consistent with published class pharmacology include: - **Geometry, visual drifting, color enhancement, internal hallucinations** — consistent with 5-HT₂A agonism - **Stimulation, wakefulness, muscle tension, bruxism** — consistent with amphetamine scaffold (though not via monoamine release per Ref 5) - **Body high, spontaneous body sensations, temperature dysregulation** — consistent with PiHKAL body load reports - **Anxiety, thought loops, confusion** — documented risk at higher doses across serotonergic psychedelic class ### Duration Data | Source | Onset | Peak | Offset | Aftereffects | Total | |--------|-------|------|--------|--------------|-------| | PiHKAL (Shulgin) [Ref 10] | Not stated | — | — | — | 8–12 h | | Seed data (DB, oral) | 1–2 h | 4–8 h | 3–6 h | 3–6 h | 10–16 h | | psychedelicsdaily.com [Ref 21] | 30–60 min | — | — | 2–16 h | 8–14 h | **FLAG — Discrepancy:** The seed data total duration of 10–16 hours exceeds PiHKAL's primary reported range of 8–12 hours. The seed data onset of 1–2 hours appears longer than the 30–60 minutes reported in secondary community sources. The PiHKAL figure (8–12h) represents the only primary source. These values should be reviewed against community experience for accuracy; the DB total duration range may be appropriately conservative or may reflect outlier reports. No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist to adjudicate these figures. --- ## Safety & Toxicity ### Toxic Dose / LD₅₀ - **No LD₅₀ data exist for 3C-E in any species.** The toxic dose is unknown. - No overdose case reports specifically involving 3C-E have been identified in the peer-reviewed literature. - The seed data note "toxic dose is unknown" — this is confirmed. ### Body Load The most consistently documented safety concern specific to 3C-E is its significant **body load** — Shulgin's own characterization was that it is "for most subjects a little too heavy on the body" [Ref 10]. This includes pre-nausea sensations, tremors/trembling, and body discomfort at higher doses. ### Class-Level Adverse Effect Profile No 3C-E-specific adverse event data exist. Based on the broader serotonergic phenethylamine class [Ref 9]: - **Cardiovascular effects:** Pupil dilation, tachycardia, hypertension, and vasoconstriction are typical adverse sympathomimetic effects of serotonergic psychedelics - **Hyperthermia:** Risk increases with physical activity and high ambient temperature - **Seizure risk:** Possible at high doses; documented with related phenethylamine psychedelics - **Psychological adverse effects:** Acute anxiety, panic, and confusion — dose-dependent - **HPPD:** Hallucinogen persisting perception disorder has been reported with the broader psychedelic class; generally low prevalence and often self-resolving [Ref 16] ### Toxicological Note Matsumoto et al. (2014 [Ref 5]) demonstrated that TMA (3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine), the direct structural parent of 3C-E, does **not** release 5-HT or dopamine in rat brain and does not significantly inhibit MAO. This distinguishes 3C-E from empathogenic amphetamines (MDMA, PMA) in terms of monoamine toxicity risk profile — the serotonin syndrome risk with 3C-E is expected to arise primarily from 5-HT₂A receptor agonism in combination with serotonergic drugs, rather than from monoamine release or MAO inhibition. **FLAG — Safety critical:** All toxicity data for 3C-E is inferred from structural analogy with TMA and mescaline class compounds. No 3C-E-specific safety studies exist. --- ## Harm Reduction ### Interactions **Dangerous interaction — Tramadol [seed data verified]:** Tramadol is a serotonergic opioid that inhibits the serotonin transporter (SERT) and has been associated with serotonin syndrome risk when combined with serotonergic agents [Ref 7, Ref 13]. The FDA issued a Drug Safety Communication in 2016 specifically linking tramadol to serotonin toxicity risk [Ref 13]. Combining tramadol (SERT inhibitor) with 3C-E (5-HT₂A agonist + potential indirect serotonergic activity) creates a pharmacodynamic interaction risk. The seed data's classification of this interaction as **dangerous** is pharmacologically well-supported [Ref 7]. **Cannabis interaction — Unknown:** The seed data classifies the cannabis interaction as unknown. No published studies exist on this combination specifically for 3C-E. Anecdotally, cannabis may intensify anxiety and perceptual effects during psychedelic experiences; this interaction is often listed as "caution" for serotonergic psychedelics generally but the pharmacological mechanism is not well characterized. The "unknown" classification is appropriate. **Other interactions inferred from class:** - **MAOIs:** Risk of serotonergic effects potentiation; extreme caution advised by class analogy - **SSRIs/SNRIs:** May reduce psychedelic effects (5-HT₂A downregulation with chronic use); acute combination may increase serotonergic burden - **Lithium:** Combined with psychedelics, lithium has been associated with seizure risk; classified as dangerous for LSD/proscaline class - **Stimulants (amphetamines):** May intensify cardiovascular effects - **CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion):** May prolong effects by inhibiting metabolism [Ref 4] — this is class inference from DOx compounds ### Testing and Identification - Reagent testing colors for 3C-E: No published reference data identified in the academic literature. Community sources (Erowid, Bunk Police) may have data but were not verified via academic APIs. - The PeakAL report [Ref 12] acquired 1H NMR spectra of grey-market phenylethanamines including "four para-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyphenylethanamines (mescaline analogues)" which likely includes 3C-E, but the paper is not open-access and specific NMR data for 3C-E was not confirmed. ### Key Harm Reduction Points - Shulgin's body load warning is a primary harm reduction signal: start significantly below the stated common dose - Long duration (8–12 h minimum) requires set/setting planning and time safety - No published antidote or reversal agent; benzodiazepines may be used for acute anxiety/agitation per general psychedelic emergency protocols - Cross-tolerance with other serotonergic psychedelics means effects will be attenuated if taken within days of LSD, psilocybin, or other phenethylamine psychedelics [Ref 15] --- ## Tolerance & Dependence ### Tolerance Cross-tolerance among serotonergic psychedelics is well documented and is mediated by 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in frontal cortex. de la Fuente Revenga et al. (2022 [Ref 15]) demonstrated using the DOI/LSD HTR model that: - Tolerance to HTR develops as rapidly as 24 hours after a single administration - Cross-tolerance occurs between different psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (DOI and LSD) - Non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (lisuride) do not produce cross-tolerance with psychedelics - Mechanism is 5-HT₂A receptor activation-dependent and independent of β-arrestin-2 The seed data states tolerance builds "almost immediately after ingestion," with half-life of 3 days and full reset at 7 days, with cross-tolerance to the psychedelic class. These figures are **consistent with published data** for the psychedelic class [Ref 15] and align with general understanding of serotonergic psychedelic tolerance, though they have not been verified specifically for 3C-E. Earlier work (Buckholtz et al. 1990 [Ref cited in Ref 15]) showed 5-HT₂ receptor downregulation with repeated LSD administration, though mescaline (10 mg/kg × 5–10 days) did not produce the same downregulation. This is noteworthy: mescaline may have a different tolerance profile than the indole hallucinogens. Whether 3C-E (a mescaline homolog with amphetamine chain) shares mescaline's profile or more resembles DOI/LSD in this regard is unknown — **FLAG for editorial review.** ### Dependence The seed data states 3C-E is "not habit-forming." This is consistent with the class: serotonergic psychedelics generally have very low dependence liability, are not positively reinforcing in animal models, and rapid tolerance development limits compulsive use. No 3C-E-specific dependence data exist. --- ## Legal Status | Jurisdiction | Status | Notes | |---|---|---| | United States | Not specifically scheduled | Potential Schedule I analog under Federal Analogue Act (mescaline analog); mescaline is Schedule I. FAA requires proof of intent for human consumption to prosecute [Ref 22] | | United Kingdom | Illegal | Prohibited under Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (blanket ban on psychoactive substances not otherwise exempted) [Ref 22] | | Germany | Controlled | Scheduled under Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (NpSG) effective November 26, 2016. Possession is illegal but not penalized; production, import, distribution, and administration are criminal offenses [Ref 22] | | Australia | Unconfirmed for 3C-E specifically | Mescaline is Schedule 9 (Prohibited Substance) under the Poisons Standard; 3C-E as a close analog would likely fall under analog provisions, but this could not be confirmed via available sources | | Canada | Unconfirmed for 3C-E specifically | Mescaline is Schedule III under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA); analog status of 3C-E not confirmed | | Sweden | Likely controlled | Country with broad NPS scheduling; specific date/instrument not confirmed | **FLAG:** Australia and Canada scheduling for 3C-E specifically could not be confirmed in the published literature or accessible legal databases. The generation agent should note these as unconfirmed and recommend verification. --- ## Clinical Trials No clinical trials for 3C-E have been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or any other database. A search returned zero results [Step 9]. No clinical trials for mescaline analogs of the 3C series appear in any registry. --- ## Community Feedback Analysis **No community feedback was submitted.** (Brief Part A2 is empty.) --- ## Gaps & Flags ### Critical Gaps 1. **No in vitro receptor binding data (Ki/EC₅₀) for 3C-E** at any receptor target. All receptor pharmacology claims require explicit labeling as "class inference from TMA/mescaline analogs." 2. **No human pharmacokinetic data** — no bioavailability, Tmax, half-life, volume of distribution, or clearance data. CYP enzyme involvement is inferred by analogy with DOx/TMA-2 compounds. 3. **No LD₅₀ or human toxicology data** — toxic dose is genuinely unknown. No case reports of overdose or serious adverse events specifically involving 3C-E in the peer-reviewed literature. 4. **SMILES not confirmed via PubChem API** — obtained from secondary web source; requires verification against PubChem SID or ChemSpider. 5. **CAS number (146849-92-5) not confirmed via PubChem CAS lookup** — retrieved from secondary source only. ### Safety-Critical Flags 6. **Dose range discrepancy [FLAG FOR REVIEW]:** - PiHKAL primary source: 30–60 mg oral - Seed data (DB): common 40–60 mg; strong 60–80 mg; heavy 80+ mg; threshold 20 mg - psychedelicsdaily.com: threshold 15–25 mg; common 35–50 mg; strong 50–70 mg+ - The seed data's "heavy" dose category (80+ mg) **exceeds PiHKAL's stated maximum (60 mg)** with no documented source for this range. Given Shulgin's warning about body load at 60 mg, the 80+ mg "heavy" categorization is potentially dangerous if it normalizes very high doses. **Recommend editorial review and conservative curation.** 7. **Duration discrepancy [FLAG FOR REVIEW]:** - PiHKAL: 8–12 hours (primary source) - Seed data: 10–16 hours total (oral) - psychedelicsdaily.com: 8–14 hours total; onset 30–60 minutes (vs. seed data's 1–2 hours) - The upper bound of 16 hours in seed data exceeds all documented primary sources. The onset range (1–2 h in seed data vs. 30–60 min in secondary sources) is worth verifying. 8. **Primary ROA listed as "insufflated" [FLAG FOR REVIEW]:** - PiHKAL exclusively documents oral administration for 3C-E - No published data on intranasal bioavailability, onset, or dosing for 3C-E - The insufflated ROA and its dose/duration data (threshold 15 mg, common 35–60 mg, onset 5–90 min) appear to be derived from community experience without published backing - Listing insufflated as the *primary* ROA is unusual and requires editorial justification; oral should likely be primary 9. **Mescaline tolerance vs. indole psychedelic tolerance [FLAG FOR REVIEW]:** - Buckholtz et al. (1990) found mescaline did not produce 5-HT₂ downregulation with repeated use, unlike LSD - Whether the 7-day full reset tolerance schedule (seed data) applies specifically to 3C-E or is derived from indole psychedelic tolerance norms is unclear - No specific tolerance data for 3C-E exist 10. **Australia and Canada legal status unconfirmed** for 3C-E specifically. 11. **No published stereochemical analysis** of 3C-E enantiomers — all reported use involves racemates. 12. **No analytical forensic data** (GC-MS, HPLC, reagent test colors) confirmed for 3C-E in peer-reviewed publications.