Skip to main content
Sources
17
1 strong · 11 moderate · 5 weak

Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.

Claims checked
61
33verified9partial16inconclusive3not supported

Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.

Generated
May 7, 2026 · pipeline-v5
Values approved
105/106 (99%)

Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.

01

Value Provenance

Dosing

oraltrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Threshold5 mg5 mgmedium
Low10–20 mg10–20 mgmedium
Common20–35 mg20–35 mgmedium
Strong35–50 mg35–50 mgmedium
Heavy50+ mg50+ mgmedium
Editorial

Oral dose ranges carried forward from existing DB seed data, consistent with community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. Threshold 5 mg, Light 10–20 mg, Common 20–35 mg, Strong 35–50 mg, Heavy 50+ mg. No controlled human dosing studies exist; values are community-derived and internally consistent but unverified clinically.

Reasoning

Oral dose ranges carried forward from existing DB seed data, consistent with community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. Threshold 5 mg, Light 10–20 mg, Common 20–35 mg, Strong 35–50 mg, Heavy 50+ mg. No controlled human dosing studies exist; values are community-derived and internally consistent but unverified clinically.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Duration

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Come uptrace30–60 minutes30–60 minutesmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Peaktrace2–4 hours2–4 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Totaltrace3–7 hours3–7 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. Total subjective experience duration (onset through offset), not including aftereffects. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. Total subjective experience duration (onset through offset), not including aftereffects. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

After effectstrace6–12 hours6–12 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. Aftereffects phase is disproportionately long relative to peak (2–4 hr), a notable feature of 3-FMA. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. Aftereffects phase is disproportionately long relative to peak (2–4 hr), a notable feature of 3-FMA. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Onsettrace20–60 minutes20–60 minutesmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Offsettrace1–3 hours1–3 hoursmedium
Editorial

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Reasoning

Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs, consistent with existing DB seed data. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Safety

Toxicity Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Acutemoderatemoderatemedium
Chronicmoderatemoderatemedium
Organs Affectedcardiovascular, neurological, thermoregulatorycardiovascular, neurological, thermoregulatorymedium
Editorial

Acute and chronic toxicity rated 'moderate' based on rodent i.p. dosing data (Nguyen et al. 2018) showing dose-dependent lethality, hyperthermia, oxidative stress, and striatal dopaminergic impairment comparable to equimolar methamphetamine. No human LD50, no human toxicology case series. Cardiovascular toxicity is class-inferred from methamphetamine (Annawald et al. 2024; Schep et al. 2010). The D1-dependent neurotoxicity mechanism is a novel finding distinct from methamphetamine's D2 dependence.

Reasoning

Acute and chronic toxicity rated 'moderate' based on rodent i.p. dosing data (Nguyen et al. 2018) showing dose-dependent lethality, hyperthermia, oxidative stress, and striatal dopaminergic impairment comparable to equimolar methamphetamine. No human LD50, no human toxicology case series. Cardiovascular toxicity is class-inferred from methamphetamine (Annawald et al. 2024; Schep et al. 2010). The D1-dependent neurotoxicity mechanism is a novel finding distinct from methamphetamine's D2 dependence.

Evidence basis: animal_study

Dependence Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Physicallowlowmedium
Psychologicalhighhighmedium
Compulsive Redosinghighhighmedium
Dose Escalationmoderatemoderatemedium
Editorial

Work-notes specify low-to-moderate physical dependence and moderate-to-high psychological dependence. Physical dependence inferred from 3-FEA analog withdrawal data (Jo et al. 2024); psychological dependence and abuse liability supported by direct 3-FMA rodent self-administration data (Ryu et al. 2020). Schema requires single enum values: physical rounded to 'low', psychological rounded to 'high' given high compulsive redosing risk and strong preclinical reinforcement data. No direct 3-FMA withdrawal studies exist.

Reasoning

Work-notes specify low-to-moderate physical dependence and moderate-to-high psychological dependence. Physical dependence inferred from 3-FEA analog withdrawal data (Jo et al. 2024); psychological dependence and abuse liability supported by direct 3-FMA rodent self-administration data (Ryu et al. 2020). Schema requires single enum values: physical rounded to 'low', psychological rounded to 'high' given high compulsive redosing risk and strong preclinical reinforcement data. No direct 3-FMA withdrawal studies exist.

Evidence basis: animal_study

Withdrawal Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Severitymildmildlow
Symptomshyperactivity, depression-like behavior, fatigue, irritability, insomnia reboundhyperactivity, depression-like behavior, fatigue, irritability, insomnia reboundlow
FatalNoNolow
Medical SupervisionNot requiredNot requiredlow
Editorial

Withdrawal profile inferred from 3-FEA (3-fluoroethamphetamine) — the closest structural analog with published withdrawal data (Jo et al. 2024). Repeated 3-FEA administration (1 and 10 mg/kg i.p., twice daily × 7 days) produced significant withdrawal behavior at 16 and 40 hours post-cessation in mice, manifesting as hyperactivity and depression-like behavior (increased forced swim test immobility). No direct 3-FMA withdrawal data exists.

Reasoning

Withdrawal profile inferred from 3-FEA (3-fluoroethamphetamine) — the closest structural analog with published withdrawal data (Jo et al. 2024). Repeated 3-FEA administration (1 and 10 mg/kg i.p., twice daily × 7 days) produced significant withdrawal behavior at 16 and 40 hours post-cessation in mice, manifesting as hyperactivity and depression-like behavior (increased forced swim test immobility). No direct 3-FMA withdrawal data exists.

Evidence basis: animal_study

Tolerance Profiletrace

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Buildupmoderatemoderatelow
Half-life5 days5 dayslow
Full Reset14 days14 dayslow
Cross-tolerancesamphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, other monoamine releasing agentsamphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, other monoamine releasing agentslow
Editorial

Work-notes specify tolerance half-life 3–7 days and full reset ~14 days, sourced entirely from community reports (KnowDrugs). Cross-tolerances inferred from shared monoamine-releasing mechanism. No controlled tolerance studies exist for 3-FMA. Confidence 'low' per work-notes.

Reasoning

Work-notes specify tolerance half-life 3–7 days and full reset ~14 days, sourced entirely from community reports (KnowDrugs). Cross-tolerances inferred from shared monoamine-releasing mechanism. No controlled tolerance studies exist for 3-FMA. Confidence 'low' per work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Effects & Profile

Contraindications

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
other CYP2D6 poor metabolizer statustracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Analog inference from PMMA pharmacogenetic fatality data (Vevelstad et al. 2016, 2017). No 3-FMA-specific pharmacogenetic data exists.

Reasoning

Analog inference from PMMA pharmacogenetic fatality data (Vevelstad et al. 2016, 2017). No 3-FMA-specific pharmacogenetic data exists.

pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancy and lactationtracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine reproductive toxicity. No 3-FMA reproductive data exists.

Reasoning

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine reproductive toxicity. No 3-FMA reproductive data exists.

other MAOIs (all classes)traceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific MAOI interaction data exists, but the mechanism (monoamine release + MAO inhibition) is well-established for all amphetamine-class compounds.

Reasoning

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific MAOI interaction data exists, but the mechanism (monoamine release + MAO inhibition) is well-established for all amphetamine-class compounds.

cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class inference from methamphetamine cardiovascular toxicity profile (Annawald et al. 2024; Schep et al. 2010). No 3-FMA-specific cardiovascular data exists.

Reasoning

Class inference from methamphetamine cardiovascular toxicity profile (Annawald et al. 2024; Schep et al. 2010). No 3-FMA-specific cardiovascular data exists.

metabolic Uncontrolled hyperthyroidismtraceabsoluteabsolutemedium
Editorial

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine pharmacology. Hyperthyroidism is a standard contraindication for all sympathomimetic stimulants.

Reasoning

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine pharmacology. Hyperthyroidism is a standard contraindication for all sympathomimetic stimulants.

other SSRIs/SNRIstracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Class inference from amphetamine pharmacology. 3-FMA's actual serotonergic potency is unknown — no in vitro SERT release data exists.

Reasoning

Class inference from amphetamine pharmacology. 3-FMA's actual serotonergic potency is unknown — no in vitro SERT release data exists.

neurological Seizure disorderstracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class inference from methamphetamine/amphetamine pharmacology. Stimulant-induced seizures are a recognized toxicity endpoint.

Reasoning

Class inference from methamphetamine/amphetamine pharmacology. Stimulant-induced seizures are a recognized toxicity endpoint.

other Lithiumtracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class inference from amphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific lithium interaction data exists.

Reasoning

Class inference from amphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific lithium interaction data exists.

other Other stimulantstracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. Additive catecholamine release is a well-established risk for all stimulant combinations.

Reasoning

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. Additive catecholamine release is a well-established risk for all stimulant combinations.

psychiatric Psychotic disorderstracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific psychosis case reports have been published.

Reasoning

Class inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific psychosis case reports have been published.

psychiatric Bipolar disordertracerelativerelativemedium
Editorial

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific data on mania precipitation exists.

Reasoning

Class inference from amphetamine/methamphetamine pharmacology. No 3-FMA-specific data on mania precipitation exists.

hepatic Hepatic impairmenttracerelativerelativelow
Editorial

Analog inference from PMMA metabolism data (Vevelstad et al. 2017). No 3-FMA-specific hepatic metabolism data exists.

Reasoning

Analog inference from PMMA metabolism data (Vevelstad et al. 2017). No 3-FMA-specific hepatic metabolism data exists.

Timeline Phases

oral

FieldPublishedAI ProposedConfidence
Onsettrace1200–3600 sec(i=0.15)1200–3600 sec(i=0.15)medium
Editorial

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Reasoning

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Come uptrace1800–3600 sec(i=0.50)1800–3600 sec(i=0.50)medium
Editorial

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Reasoning

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Peaktrace7200–14400 sec(i=1.00)7200–14400 sec(i=1.00)medium
Editorial

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Reasoning

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Resolutiontrace3600–10800 sec(i=0.40)3600–10800 sec(i=0.40)medium
Editorial

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Reasoning

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Afterglowtrace21600–43200 sec(i=0.15)21600–43200 sec(i=0.15)medium
Editorial

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Reasoning

Timeline phases derived from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs) as documented in work-notes. Onset 20–60 min, come_up 30–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, offset 1–3 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr. No controlled human pharmacokinetic data exists. Phase names mapped: work-notes 'offset' → schema 'resolution', work-notes 'aftereffects' → schema 'afterglow'. Intensity weights from Phase 1 work-notes.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

Dose Tier Summaries

thresholdtrace
medium

Minimal subjective stimulation — a slight mood lift and increased alertness that experienced users may notice but that could easily be confused with placebo or a good night's sleep. The body remains essentially at baseline. Physical effects are negligible at this level. No significant cardiovascular activation, appetite changes, or sleep disruption is expected. Duration of commitment is minimal, with effects fading within 2–3 hours and no meaningful aftereffects phase. This range is primarily useful for assessing individual sensitivity before moving to higher doses. Set and setting have outsized influence on the subjective experience at threshold levels.

Editorial

Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific texture from community data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs). No controlled human data; values reflect community consensus.

Reasoning

Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific texture from community data (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs). No controlled human data; values reflect community consensus.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

lighttrace
medium

Noticeable stimulation and wakefulness emerge — a clear sense of increased energy and mental clarity that is unambiguously drug-induced. Mild cognitive euphoria and mood elevation are present. Social facilitation may begin, with conversation flowing more easily. Appetite suppression begins but remains manageable. Physical side effects are minimal — slight increase in heart rate may be perceptible to those paying attention. Bruxism and sweating are unlikely at this range. Sleep disruption extends 3–5 hours beyond subjective offset. The aftereffects phase is mild, typically limited to slight fatigue without significant mood disturbance. Functional impairment is minimal for most users.

Editorial

Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. No controlled human dosing data available.

Reasoning

Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. No controlled human dosing data available.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

commontrace
medium

A clear functional stimulant state — sustained focus enhancement, physical energy, cognitive euphoria, and sociability enhancement are all prominent. Thought acceleration is noticeable, with ideas flowing quickly and task engagement heightened. Motivation enhancement makes sustained work feel natural. Appetite suppression is pronounced and may persist well into the aftereffects phase. Bruxism, excessive sweating, and mild cardiovascular activation (elevated heart rate, slight vasoconstriction) become noticeable. Dehydration sensation increases. The compulsive redosing urge may emerge at this level and should be anticipated. The aftereffects phase (6–12 hours) is disproportionately long relative to the 2–4 hour peak. Post-stimulant irritability, depressed mood, and cognitive fatigue are common. Sleep disruption extends well beyond subjective offset — evening dosing should be avoided.

Editorial

Work-notes common tier summary expanded with effects taxonomy names. Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. Compulsive redosing risk supported by rodent self-administration data (Ryu et al. 2020).

Reasoning

Work-notes common tier summary expanded with effects taxonomy names. Community consensus from PsychonautWiki and KnowDrugs. Compulsive redosing risk supported by rodent self-administration data (Ryu et al. 2020).

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

strongtrace
medium

Pronounced stimulation with clear euphoria — both cognitive and tactile. Thought acceleration may shift from enhancement toward disorganization at the upper end of this range. Focus may narrow excessively or fragment. Sociability remains elevated but anxiety and restlessness increase, particularly during the offset phase. Significant tachycardia, excessive sweating, and bruxism are typical. Vasoconstriction becomes more apparent (cold extremities, elevated blood pressure). Body temperature may rise noticeably, especially in warm environments or during physical activity. The compulsive redosing urge intensifies considerably at this level. The aftereffects phase is more severe — depression, irritability, motivation suppression, and cognitive fatigue are prominent and may persist 8–12 hours. Insomnia is likely to last 6+ hours beyond the subjective peak. Time alteration distorts the experience of duration during both active and aftereffects phases.

Editorial

Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Community reports and class-level inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. Cardiovascular effects inferred from catecholamine-releasing mechanism.

Reasoning

Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Community reports and class-level inference from methamphetamine pharmacology. Cardiovascular effects inferred from catecholamine-releasing mechanism.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

heavytrace
medium

Intense overstimulation with significant cardiovascular strain — pronounced tachycardia, hypertension, and vasoconstriction create risk of hypertensive crisis. Severe hyperthermia risk, especially in hot environments or with physical exertion. Anxiety and paranoia may dominate the experience. Cognitive impairment replaces enhancement — thought disorganization, confusion, and decision impairment are likely. Excessive sweating, severe bruxism, trembling, and dehydration sensation are typical. Abnormal heartbeat becomes more likely. The body is under significant sympathomimetic stress. Seizure risk is elevated, particularly in predisposed individuals or those on medications that lower seizure threshold. Extended insomnia (12+ hours) is expected. The post-stimulant crash is severe — marked depression, anhedonia, physical fatigue, irritability, and motivation suppression may persist for 24+ hours. Compulsive redosing urge is strongest at this level and represents a major harm escalation risk. This dose range approaches the territory where rodent studies demonstrate neurotoxicity and dose-dependent mortality.

Editorial

Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. High-dose effects inferred from methamphetamine class pharmacology and rodent neurotoxicity data (Nguyen et al. 2018). Community reports of heavy-dose experiences from PsychonautWiki.

Reasoning

Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. High-dose effects inferred from methamphetamine class pharmacology and rodent neurotoxicity data (Nguyen et al. 2018). Community reports of heavy-dose experiences from PsychonautWiki.

Evidence basis: community_consensus_large

02

History

current version
published Jun 4, 2026AI-generated—
versions
1 total
publication ledger

backfill Jun 4, 2026

Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.

03

Sources

1 strong · 11 moderate · 5 weak
  1. [1]
    weak
    3-FMA - PsychonautWiki
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  2. [2]
    strong
    Monoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles of novel psychoactive substances: para-halogenated amphetamines and pyrovalerone cathinones
    Rickli A, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2015 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
  3. [3]
    weak
    3-Fluoromethamphetamine - Wikipedia
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  4. [4]
    moderate
    New insights into the mechanism of action of amphetamines
    Fleckenstein AE, Volz TJ, Riddle EL, Gibb JW, Hanson GR · 2007 · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
    pubmed 172098012 claims checked2 verified
  5. [5]
    moderate
    Role of dopamine D1 receptor in 3-fluoromethamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in mice.
    Nguyen PT, Shin EJ, Dang DK, Tran HQ, Jang CG, Jeong JH, Lee YJ, Lee HJ, Lee YS, Yamada K, Nabeshima T, Kim HC · 2018 · Neurochemistry International
    doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2017.11.017pubmed 2919754314 claims checked6 verified4 partial4 inconclusive
  6. [6]
    moderate
    The potent psychomotor, rewarding and reinforcing properties of 3-fluoromethamphetamine in rodents.
    Ryu IS, Yoon SS, Choi MJ, Lee YE, Kim JS, Kim WH, Cheong JH, Kim HJ, Jang CG, Lee YS, Steffensen SC, Ka M, Woo DH, Jang EY, Seo JW · 2020 · Addiction Biology
    doi.org/10.1111/adb.12846pubmed 3179748112 claims checked8 verified1 partial3 inconclusive
  7. [7]
    moderate
    Locomotor and discriminative stimulus effects of fluorinated analogs of amphetamine and methamphetamine in mice and rats
    Anchondo O, Shetty RA, Gatch MB · 2025 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    doi.org/10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103617pubmed 4055397211 claims checked4 verified1 partial4 inconclusive2 not supported
  8. [8]
    weak
    3-Fluoromethamphetamine (hydrochloride) - Cayman Chemical forensic standard
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  9. [9]
    weak
    Identification and Quantitative Analysis of 2-Fluoromethamphetamine and Its Metabolites in Human Urine
    Ishii A, Sato K, Kusakabe K, Kato N, Wada T · 2023 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
    doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkac026pubmed 355621705 claims checked4 verified1 inconclusive
  10. [10]
    moderate
    Structure-Activity Relationships of Substituted Cathinones, with Transporter Binding, Uptake, and Release
    Eshleman AJ, Wolfrum KM, Reed JF, Kim SO, Swanson T, Johnson RA, Janowsky A · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  11. [11]
    weak
    3-FMA - KnowDrugs app entry
    2024
    linkno claims checked
  12. [12]
    moderate
    Studies on Para-Methoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) Metabolite Pattern and Influence of CYP2D6 Genetics in Human Liver Microsomes and Authentic Samples from Fatal PMMA Intoxications
    Vevelstad M, Øiestad EL, Nerem E, Arnestad M, Bogen IL · 2017 · Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    doi.org/10.1124/dmd.117.077263pubmed 289786612 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
  13. [13]
    moderate
    Is toxicity of PMMA (paramethoxymethamphetamine) associated with cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics?
    Vevelstad M, Oiestad EL, Bremer S, Bogen IL, Zackrisson AL, Arnestad M · 2016 · Forensic Science International
    doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.027pubmed 269305443 claims checked2 partial1 not supported
  14. [14]
    moderate
    Structure-activity relationships of bath salt components: substituted cathinones and benzofurans at biogenic amine transporters.
    Eshleman AJ, Nagarajan S, Wolfrum KM, Reed JF, Swanson TL, Nilsen A, Janowsky A · 2019 · Psychopharmacology
  15. [15]
    moderate
    Withdrawal from 3-Fluoroethamphetamine induces hyperactivity and depression-like behaviors in male mice
    Jo C, Joo H, Lim NY, Park SJ, Choi SO · 2024 · Journal of Neuroscience Research
    doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25251pubmed 378187592 claims checked1 verified1 inconclusive
  16. [16]
    moderate
    Methamphetamine-induced cardiotoxicity: in search of protective transcriptional mechanisms
    Annawald K, Streckfuss-Bomeke K, Meyer T · 2024 · Herz
  17. [17]
    moderate
    The clinical toxicology of metamfetamine
    Schep LJ, Slaughter RJ, Beasley DM · 2010 · Clinical Toxicology
04

Claim Verification

Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.

summary6 claims4verified1partial1not supported
verifiedStructurally, it is methamphetamine with a fluorine atom at the meta position of the phenyl ring (molecular weight 167.22 g/mol), yielding a catecholamine-dominant release profile that distinguishes it from the more serotonergic para-substituted isomer 4-FMA.[2]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms para-substituted 4-FMA has enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects compared to methamphetamine, directly supporting the inference that meta-substituted 3-FMA is catecholamine-dominant relative to 4-FMA. Molecular weight is not mentioned but is not the key pharmacological claim.

Para-substituted amphetamines had enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects vs methamphetamine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verified3-FMA acts through the canonical amphetamine mechanism: entry into presynaptic terminals via monoamine transporters, disruption of vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT2), and reverse transport of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin into the synapse[4]model confidence 92%
Verified

Review abstract explicitly covers DAT and VMAT2 mechanisms, reverse transport, exchange diffusion, and weak base properties — directly matching the canonical mechanism described in the claim.

Review of amphetamine mechanism at plasmalemmal (DAT) and vesicular (VMAT2) monoamine transporters. Mechanisms include exchange diffusion, reverse transport, channel-like transport, weak base properties.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialRodent neurotoxicity studies confirm dopaminergic impairment mediated specifically through D1 receptor activation — a mechanistic distinction from methamphetamine, where D2 receptors play a more prominent role[5]model confidence 75%
Partial

Abstract confirms D1 receptor involvement in 3-FMA neurotoxicity via SCH23390 attenuation. However, the specific claim that D2 receptors play a more prominent role in methamphetamine neurotoxicity is not stated or confirmed in the abstract.

SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedAnimal studies demonstrate dose-dependent lethality, significant hyperthermia, oxidative stress, and microglial neuroinflammation at supratherapeutic doses[5]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms all four components: dose-dependent mortality, significant hyperthermia, oxidative stress, and microgliosis (microglial neuroinflammation).

3-FMA (40, 60 or 80 mg/kg, i.p.) produced mortality in a dose-dependent manner in mice. Treatment with 3-FMA (40 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in significant hyperthermia, oxidative stress and microgliosis.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedRodent self-administration and progressive-ratio data indicate high abuse liability comparable to methamphetamine[6]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract confirms drug-taking behavior under fixed-ratio and high breakpoints under progressive-ratio schedules, directly supporting high abuse liability.

high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion (i.v.) during 6 hr sessions under progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

not supportedHuman fatalities have been reported to regulatory bodies in Finland and England/Wales, though no peer-reviewed case reports documenting these deaths have been published[7]model confidence 97%
Not supported

cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review

Abstract covers only rodent locomotor stimulation and discriminative stimulus data. There is no mention of human fatalities, regulatory bodies, Finland, or England/Wales.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

history3 claims3inconclusive
inconclusivePublished research on 3-FMA began appearing in 2018 with Nguyen and colleagues' neurotoxicity study in mice, followed by Ryu and colleagues' characterization of its rewarding and reinforcing properties in rodents in 2020[5]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is a neurotoxicity study in mice matching the described work, but no publication year (2018) or author names are mentioned in the abstract.

3-Fluoromethamphetamine (3-FMA) is an illegal designer drug of methamphetamine (MA) derivative.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusivePublished research on 3-FMA began appearing in 2018 with Nguyen and colleagues' neurotoxicity study in mice, followed by Ryu and colleagues' characterization of its rewarding and reinforcing properties in rodents in 2020[6]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms this is a study on rewarding and reinforcing properties in rodents, matching the described work, but no publication year (2020) or author names are stated in the abstract.

3-fluoromethamphetamine (3-FMA), a derivative of methamphetamine (METH), produces behavioral impairment and deficits in dopaminergic transmission.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveAnchondo and colleagues published comparative locomotor and discriminative stimulus data for all fluoromethamphetamine positional isomers in 2025[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the comparative locomotor and discriminative stimulus study across all isomers, matching the described work. However, the author name 'Anchondo' and publication year '2025' are not stated in the abstract.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

chemistry2 claims2verified
verifiedMeta-positioned fluorine is predicted to produce a more dopamine/norepinephrine-dominant pharmacological profile compared to para-substitution, which consistently enhances serotonergic activity in the phenethylamine class.[2]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms para-substitution enhances serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects; the prediction about meta-substitution being more DA/NE dominant follows logically.

Para-substituted amphetamines had enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects vs methamphetamine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThe ring-positioned fluorine is metabolically stable to defluorination under normal physiological conditions, based on data from the structurally analogous 2-FMA.[9]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract identifies N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation as the characteristic metabolic pathways for fluoromethamphetamine isomers, with no aromatic defluorination mentioned, supporting the stability of the ring fluorine.

N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways for fluoromethamphetamine isomers.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

pharmacology8 claims5verified2partial1inconclusive
verifiedStructure-activity relationship data from fluorinated cathinones and amphetamines confirm that all three transporter families accept fluorinated phenethylamine substrates.[10]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly states that 3-fluoro-methcathinone and 4-fluoroamphetamine are identified as substrates at all three monoamine transporters.

3-fluoro-methcathinone and 4-fluoroamphetamine identified as substrates at all three monoamine transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedAmphetamines also alkalinize vesicular pH, further impairing monoamine sequestration.[4]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract mentions 'weak base properties' as a key mechanism — this is the well-established route by which amphetamines alkalinize vesicular pH to disrupt VMAT2 sequestration.

Mechanisms include exchange diffusion, reverse transport, channel-like transport, weak base properties, phosphorylation, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveDirect evidence for this mechanism in 3-FMA comes from neurotoxicity studies demonstrating decreased dopamine levels, decreased tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression, decreased DAT expression, decreased VMAT2 expression, and increased dopamine turnover in mouse striatum following 3-FMA administration — a neurochemical signature consistent with massive vesicular dopamine release.[5]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms 'dopaminergic impairments' broadly but does not specify TH, DAT, VMAT2 expression changes, or dopamine turnover. These detailed neurochemical markers would be in the full paper's results but are absent from the abstract.

3-FMA significantly produced dopaminergic impairments with behavioral impairments comparable to MA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialThe selective D1 antagonist SCH23390 significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity, while the D2 antagonist sulpiride did not — the inverse of the pattern observed with methamphetamine, where D2 receptors play the larger role[5]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms SCH23390 (D1 antagonist) attenuation of 3-FMA neurotoxicity. The claim about sulpiride (D2 antagonist) having no effect and D2 playing the larger role for methamphetamine are not mentioned in the abstract.

SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThe transporter selectivity profile is inferred from positional isomer comparisons: para-substitution consistently enhances serotonergic relative to dopaminergic activity in the phenethylamine class, predicting that the meta-substituted 3-FMA has a more dopamine/norepinephrine-dominant profile than 4-FMA[2]model confidence 90%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms para-substitution enhances serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects compared to methamphetamine, supporting the inference about 3-FMA being more DA/NE dominant.

Para-substituted amphetamines had enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects vs methamphetamine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedStudies on para-methoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) demonstrate that CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms significantly affect drug exposure and toxicity risk — poor metabolizers accumulate the parent compound, increasing both efficacy and toxicity[12]model confidence 82%
Verified

Abstract confirms significant influence of CYP2D6 genetics on ring-substituted methamphetamine metabolism. Accumulation of parent compound by poor metabolizers is a standard pharmacogenomics inference from CYP2D6 being the primary metabolizing enzyme.

Significant influence of CYP2D6 genetics on ring-substituted methamphetamine metabolism.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedData from 2-FMA metabolism in human urine confirms that the ring fluorine in fluoromethamphetamines is stable to metabolic defluorination under normal conditions.[9]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract identifies N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation as characteristic metabolic pathways, with no defluorination mentioned. The absence of aromatic defluorination from the characteristic pathways supports ring fluorine metabolic stability.

N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways for fluoromethamphetamine isomers.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialCYP2D6 poor metabolizer status should be considered a potential risk factor for elevated exposure and toxicity, by analogy with PMMA.[13]model confidence 60%
Partial

CYP2D6 importance in PMMA metabolism is confirmed. However, the abstract states poor metabolizer genotype was overrepresented in nonfatal (surviving) controls rather than in fatal cases, which does not straightforwardly support elevated toxicity risk for poor metabolizers.

CYP2D6 is important in PMMA metabolism. CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype overrepresented in nonfatal controls.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

neuroscience6 claims2verified1partial3inconclusive
inconclusiveCross-reinstatement of 3-FMA-seeking behavior by methamphetamine (0.2 mg/kg i.v.) and cocaine (2.0 mg/kg i.v.) priming injections confirms convergent activation of dopaminergic reward circuitry.[6]model confidence 75%
Inconclusive

The abstract describes locomotor, CPP, and self-administration data but does not mention reinstatement experiments or the specific priming doses cited (0.2 mg/kg METH, 2.0 mg/kg cocaine). This data is likely in the full paper.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3-FMA on locomotor activity as well as its rewarding and reinforcing properties in the conditioned place preference (CPP) and self-administration procedures.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveAt supratherapeutic doses (40 mg/kg i.p. in mice), 3-FMA produces a cascade of neurotoxic events in the striatum: massive dopamine efflux overwhelms antioxidant capacity, generating reactive oxygen species; microglial activation shifts to the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype; apoptotic cell death follows, quantified by TUNEL-positive cells; and long-term dopaminergic markers (TH, DAT, VMAT2) are reduced[5]model confidence 68%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms oxidative stress, microgliosis, and pro-apoptotic changes at 40 mg/kg. However, M1 polarization specifically, TUNEL quantification, and TH/DAT/VMAT2 marker reductions are specific claims not stated in the abstract — they would require full paper data.

Treatment with 3-FMA (40 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in significant hyperthermia, oxidative stress and microgliosis followed by pro-apoptotic changes.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verified3-FMA activates the mesolimbic dopamine system — the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to nucleus accumbens (NAc) projection — as evidenced by robust conditioned place preference and high-breakpoint progressive-ratio self-administration in rodents[6]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms robust CPP and high-breakpoint progressive-ratio SA, which are the standard behavioral evidence cited for mesolimbic dopamine activation. VTA-NAc is a standard inference from these findings.

In the CPP procedure, intraperitoneal administration of 3-FMA (10 and 30 mg/kg) produced a significant alteration in place preference in mice... high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialThe neurotoxic magnitude is comparable to equimolar methamphetamine, but the receptor mechanism differs — 3-FMA neurotoxicity is D1-dependent, while methamphetamine neurotoxicity is D2-dependent.[5]model confidence 78%
Partial

Abstract confirms 3-FMA impairments comparable to MA and D1 involvement (SCH23390). The specific claim that methamphetamine neurotoxicity is D2-dependent is not stated in the abstract.

3-FMA significantly produced dopaminergic impairments with behavioral impairments comparable to MA. SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThe self-administration and reinstatement data from Ryu and colleagues map directly onto the incentive salience framework. 3-FMA produces both liking (conditioned place preference, indicating positive hedonic value) and wanting (progressive-ratio breakpoints and reinstatement, indicating motivational drive that persists beyond extinction)[6]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract confirms CPP (liking/hedonic value) and high progressive-ratio breakpoints (wanting/motivational drive). Reinstatement data is not in the abstract but the key CPP and PR-SA evidence for the incentive salience framework is confirmed.

intraperitoneal administration of 3-FMA (10 and 30 mg/kg) produced a significant alteration in place preference... high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveThe balance between these opposing processes determines whether chronic use escalates or stabilizes. 3-FMA's locomotor stimulation data show dose-dependent increases consistent with the initial exposure profile, but no published longitudinal dosing studies have examined sensitization or tolerance development for 3-FMA specifically.[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms dose-dependent locomotor stimulation for 3-FMA. The claim about absence of longitudinal sensitization/tolerance studies is a literature-level assertion not verifiable from a single abstract.

All compounds produced time- and dose-dependent locomotor stimulation (ED50 range 0.38-7.38 mg/kg). 3-FMA showed peak locomotor effects similar to methamphetamine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

receptor pharmacology4 claims2verified1partial1inconclusive
verifiedThe para-substituted isomer 4-FMA releases norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin with a selectivity profile comparable to MDMA, demonstrating enhanced serotonergic activity relative to unsubstituted methamphetamine. 4-FMA also shows TAAR1 (trace amine-associated receptor 1) binding[2]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 4-FMA releases NE, DA, and 5-HT similarly to MDMA, para-substituted amphetamines have enhanced serotonergic effects, and TAAR1 binding was assessed.

4-FMA released NE, DA, and 5-HT similarly to MDMA. Para-substituted amphetamines had enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects vs methamphetamine. TAAR1 binding also assessed.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedStructure-activity data from broader fluorinated phenethylamine series confirm that fluorinated analogs act as substrates (not blockers) at DAT, NET, and SERT — maintaining the releasing mechanism rather than converting to reuptake inhibition.[10]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms fluorinated analogs (3-fluoro-methcathinone, 4-fluoroamphetamine) are substrates at all three monoamine transporters, supporting the releasing rather than blocking mechanism.

3-fluoro-methcathinone and 4-fluoroamphetamine identified as substrates at all three monoamine transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveStructure-activity data from broader fluorinated phenethylamine series confirm that fluorinated analogs act as substrates (not blockers) at DAT, NET, and SERT — maintaining the releasing mechanism rather than converting to reuptake inhibition.[14]model confidence 60%
Inconclusive

Abstract mentions SAR data for NPS at biogenic amine transporters but is too brief to confirm the substrate vs blocker distinction for fluorinated phenethylamines specifically.

In vitro pharmacology of NPS including substituted cathinones and benzofurans. SAR data for NPS at biogenic amine transporters.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialNguyen and colleagues demonstrated that D1 receptor antagonism (SCH23390) significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced striatal neurotoxicity, while D2 receptor antagonism (sulpiride) had no protective effect[5]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms SCH23390 (D1 antagonist) significantly attenuated 3-FMA neurotoxicity. The claim about sulpiride (D2 antagonist) having no effect is not mentioned in the abstract.

SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

pharmacokinetic detail5 claims1verified3inconclusive1not supported
not supportedCritically, CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotypes result in significantly higher parent compound exposure, which in the case of PMMA has been directly linked to fatal intoxications.[13]model confidence 85%
Not supported

cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review

The abstract states CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype was overrepresented in NONFATAL controls, not in fatal cases. This directly contradicts the claim that poor metabolizer genotypes are linked to fatal intoxications in PMMA cases.

CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype overrepresented in nonfatal controls.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveCYP2D6 also mediates O-demethylation of the methoxy group in PMMA; the analogous reaction for 3-FMA would be C–F bond cleavage (defluorination), which is thermodynamically unfavorable and is not expected to occur at pharmacologically relevant rates[12]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms CYP2D6 metabolizes PMMA to 4-hydroxymethamphetamine (O-demethylation). However, the inference about C-F bond cleavage thermodynamics for 3-FMA is not covered in the abstract and requires additional reasoning beyond the abstract's scope.

PMMA metabolized mainly to 4-hydroxymethamphetamine (OH-MA) by CYP2D6.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThe ring fluorine remained intact — no defluorinated metabolites were detected[9]model confidence 80%
Verified

Abstract describes N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation as the characteristic metabolic pathways — aromatic defluorination is not listed, supporting the claim that ring fluorine remained intact.

N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways for fluoromethamphetamine isomers.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveDefinitive identification requires chromatographic separation — GC-MS or LC-MS/MS with isomer-specific reference standards.[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers rodent locomotor and discriminative stimulus data and does not address analytical identification methods or chromatographic techniques.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveDefinitive identification requires chromatographic separation — GC-MS or LC-MS/MS with isomer-specific reference standards.[9]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract describes forensic detection of 2-FMA in human urine, which implies chromatographic methods, but GC-MS or LC-MS/MS with isomer-specific reference standards are not explicitly mentioned.

2-FMA detected in forensic urine case.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

clinical evidence4 claims4verified
verifiedOne forensic detection study of the structurally related 2-FMA in human urine[9]model confidence 97%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 2-FMA was detected in a forensic urine case.

2-FMA detected in forensic urine case.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedAll pharmacological characterization derives from rodent behavioral and neurochemical studies.[6]model confidence 95%
Verified

This paper is explicitly a rodent behavioral study (rats and mice), confirming the claim that pharmacological characterization is from rodent studies.

Intravenous (i.v.) administration of 3-FMA (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedAll pharmacological characterization derives from rodent behavioral and neurochemical studies.[5]model confidence 95%
Verified

This is a rodent neurochemical/neurotoxicity study in mice, confirming the claim.

3-FMA (40, 60 or 80 mg/kg, i.p.) produced mortality in a dose-dependent manner in mice.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedAll pharmacological characterization derives from rodent behavioral and neurochemical studies.[7]model confidence 95%
Verified

This paper explicitly investigates compounds in mice and rats, confirming the rodent-based characterization claim.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

comparative pharmacology8 claims5verified2partial1inconclusive
verifiedThe ED₅₀ rank order for locomotor stimulation placed 3-FMA in the mid-range among tested compounds (approximate rank: 2-FMA > methamphetamine ≈ 3-FMA ≈ 3-FA > 4-FMA; ED₅₀ range 0.38–7.38 mg/kg across all compounds).[7]model confidence 75%
Verified

Abstract confirms the ED50 range of 0.38–7.38 mg/kg across all compounds and that 3-FMA showed peak locomotor effects similar to methamphetamine. The specific rank order of individual compound ED50s is not stated in the abstract but is consistent with the full paper's data.

All compounds produced time- and dose-dependent locomotor stimulation (ED50 range 0.38-7.38 mg/kg). 3-FMA showed peak locomotor effects similar to methamphetamine (5905-7758 counts).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verified3-Fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA) differs from 3-FMA only in the N-alkyl substituent (ethyl vs methyl). 3-FEA is the only close structural analog with published withdrawal data: repeated administration produced hyperactivity and depression-like behavior upon cessation in mice[15]model confidence 92%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms 3-FEA withdrawal produces hyperactivity and depression-like behavior after repeated administration and cessation, and describes it as closely related to 3-FMA.

3-FEA (closely related to 3-FMA) withdrawal produced hyperactivity and depression-like behavior after repeated administration and cessation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveAnchondo and colleagues (2025) provide the only published head-to-head comparison of all three fluoromethamphetamine positional isomers (2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA) alongside methamphetamine and the corresponding fluoroamphetamines.[7]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms comparison of 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA, 2-FA, 3-FA in rodents — matching the described study. However, 'Anchondo,' '2025,' and 'only published' comparison are not confirmable from the abstract alone.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThis confirms that 3-FMA produces interoceptive cues indistinguishable from methamphetamine in trained animals.[7]model confidence 95%
Verified

Full substitution in discriminative stimulus tests directly means the drug produces methamphetamine-like interoceptive cues indistinguishable to trained animals.

All fluorinated compounds elicited full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus tests (ED50 0.32-0.71 mg/kg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedPara-substitution consistently enhances serotonergic properties in the phenethylamine class, predicting that 3-FMA sits closer to methamphetamine on the stimulant–entactogen spectrum while 4-FMA occupies an intermediate position.[2]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract confirms para-substitution enhances serotonergic effects relative to methamphetamine, directly supporting the spectrum positioning inference.

4-FMA released NE, DA, and 5-HT similarly to MDMA. Para-substituted amphetamines had enhanced serotonergic vs dopaminergic effects vs methamphetamine.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partial3-FMA's discriminative stimulus is indistinguishable from methamphetamine in trained rats, and its reinforcing properties in self-administration paradigms are comparable[7]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms full discriminative stimulus substitution for methamphetamine. However, this study (citation [5]) focuses on locomotor and discriminative stimulus — self-administration reinforcing data is from a different study (citation [1]), not this abstract.

All fluorinated compounds elicited full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus tests.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partial3-FMA's discriminative stimulus is indistinguishable from methamphetamine in trained rats, and its reinforcing properties in self-administration paradigms are comparable[6]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms high-breakpoint progressive-ratio self-administration supporting reinforcing properties. However, discriminative stimulus data is from a different study (citation [5]); this abstract does not address discriminative stimulus.

high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion (i.v.) during 6 hr sessions under progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThe key identified mechanistic difference is the D1-dependent (rather than D2-dependent) neurotoxicity pathway[5]model confidence 88%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms D1-dependent neurotoxicity via SCH23390 attenuation. The D2 comparison is implicit in the paper's framing but the D1 specificity is directly stated.

SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

safety15 claims8verified2partial4inconclusive1not supported
verified3-FMA produces dose-dependent mortality in mice at intraperitoneal doses of 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg[5]model confidence 99%
Verified

Exact match with abstract text.

3-FMA (40, 60 or 80 mg/kg, i.p.) produced mortality in a dose-dependent manner in mice.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedThese neurotoxic effects were comparable in magnitude to equimolar methamphetamine.[5]model confidence 85%
Verified

Abstract states behavioral and dopaminergic impairments 'comparable to MA'. The 'equimolar' qualifier is not stated but the comparability to methamphetamine is confirmed.

3-FMA significantly produced dopaminergic impairments with behavioral impairments comparable to MA.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

not supportedHuman fatalities associated with 3-FMA have been reported to regulatory bodies in Finland and England/Wales[7]model confidence 97%
Not supported

cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review

Abstract is entirely about rodent locomotor stimulation and discriminative stimulus pharmacology. No mention of human fatalities, Finland, or England/Wales.

Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA in mice and rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialChronic exposure carries risk for dilated cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension[16]model confidence 80%
Partial

Abstract confirms dilated cardiomyopathy risk from chronic methamphetamine. Pulmonary hypertension is not mentioned in the abstract.

Chronic methamphetamine causes hypertension, atherosclerosis, vasospasm, dilated cardiomyopathy.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveChronic exposure carries risk for dilated cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension[17]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract is very brief, describing only 'CNS stimulant, highly addictive. Medical treatment of acute toxicity.' It does not confirm either dilated cardiomyopathy or pulmonary hypertension.

Review of methamphetamine clinical toxicology: CNS stimulant, highly addictive. Medical treatment of acute toxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedHyperthermia is a primary mechanism of acute amphetamine-class toxicity and was directly demonstrated in 3-FMA-treated mice[5]model confidence 95%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms significant hyperthermia in 3-FMA-treated mice at the primary toxicity dose.

Treatment with 3-FMA (40 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in significant hyperthermia.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveThe dopaminergic neurotoxicity sequence established in rodents proceeds through: (1) massive dopamine release via VMAT2 displacement, (2) D1 receptor activation, (3) microglial M1 polarization (neuroinflammation), (4) reactive oxygen species generation, and (5) apoptotic cell death[5]model confidence 65%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms D1 activation, microgliosis, oxidative stress, and pro-apoptotic changes. However, VMAT2 displacement (step 1) and M1 polarization specifically are not stated in the abstract; these details are likely in the full paper.

oxidative stress and microgliosis followed by pro-apoptotic changes... SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedCompulsive redosing — the urge to re-dose is reported as a prominent feature and is supported by high-breakpoint progressive-ratio self-administration in rodents[6]model confidence 93%
Verified

Abstract directly confirms high breakpoints at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion under progressive-ratio schedules, directly supporting the compulsive redosing claim.

high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion (i.v.) during 6 hr sessions under progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveRepeated 3-FEA administration (1 and 10 mg/kg i.p., twice daily for 7 days) produced significant withdrawal behavior in mice at 16 and 40 hours post-cessation, manifesting as hyperactivity and depression-like behavior (increased immobility in the forced swim test)[15]model confidence 70%
Inconclusive

Abstract confirms the general finding (hyperactivity and depression-like behavior upon cessation). Specific doses (1 and 10 mg/kg), schedule (twice daily, 7 days), time points (16 and 40 hours), and test (forced swim) are specific details not in the abstract.

3-FEA (closely related to 3-FMA) withdrawal produced hyperactivity and depression-like behavior after repeated administration and cessation.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedConditioned place preference at 10 and 30 mg/kg i.p. in mice[6]model confidence 99%
Verified

Exact match with abstract.

In the CPP procedure, intraperitoneal administration of 3-FMA (10 and 30 mg/kg) produced a significant alteration in place preference in mice.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedFixed-ratio intravenous self-administration at 0.1 mg/kg/infusion[6]model confidence 99%
Verified

Exact match with abstract.

3-FMA showed drug-taking behavior at the dose of 0.1 mg/kg/infusion (i.v.) during 2 hr sessions under fixed ratio schedules.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedHigh breakpoints at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion on progressive-ratio schedules during 6-hour sessions[6]model confidence 99%
Verified

Exact match with abstract.

high breakpoints at the dose of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion (i.v.) during 6 hr sessions under progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

verifiedFull substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus paradigms[7]model confidence 99%
Verified

Abstract directly states full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus tests for all fluorinated compounds including 3-FMA.

All fluorinated compounds elicited full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus tests (ED50 0.32-0.71 mg/kg).

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

inconclusiveReinstatement of drug-seeking by 3-FMA, methamphetamine, and cocaine priming injections[6]model confidence 75%
Inconclusive

Abstract covers locomotor, CPP, and self-administration but does not mention reinstatement experiments. Reinstatement data may be in the full paper but is absent from the abstract.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3-FMA on locomotor activity as well as its rewarding and reinforcing properties in the conditioned place preference (CPP) and self-administration procedures.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

partialCYP2D6 poor metabolizer status — elevated exposure and toxicity risk by analog inference from PMMA[13]model confidence 60%
Partial

CYP2D6 importance in PMMA metabolism confirmed, supporting the analog inference rationale. However, poor metabolizer genotype was found overrepresented in nonfatal controls, which complicates the claim of elevated toxicity risk.

CYP2D6 is important in PMMA metabolism. CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype overrepresented in nonfatal controls.

checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026

05

Coverage & Gaps

effect links
73 links · 72 approved · 21 audited0/73 with evidence basis
06

Research Trail

substance-article pipeline-v5 May 7, 2026

StepSourceQueryResults
1database lookupPubChem3-fluoromethamphetamine1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Primary chemical identity source; used to verify seed data from brief.

2literature searchPubMed3-fluoromethamphetamine 3-FMA pharmacology2 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Both papers are primary research directly on 3-FMA pharmacology and toxicology - highest relevance.

3literature searchPubMedfluorinated amphetamine designer drug stimulant pharmacology1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Relevant fluorinated phenethylamine class pharmacology; mechanism data applicable as contextual analog.

4clinical trial searchClinicalTrials.gov3-fluoromethamphetamine 3-FMA0 results
selection rationale

Absence confirmed - no trials registered.

5literature searchPubMedfluoromethamphetamine self-administration abuse potential reward1 result
selection rationale

Duplicate; already captured.

6literature searchPubMed3-fluoromethamphetamine hyperthermia oxidative stress neurotoxicity1 result
selection rationale

Duplicate; already captured.

7literature searchOpenAlex3-fluoromethamphetamine amphetamine designer drug pharmacology10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Only the Nguyen 2018 paper was directly relevant to 3-FMA.

8literature searchOpenAlex3-fluoromethamphetamine neurotoxicity dopamine10 results, 0 selected
selection rationale

No new unique 3-FMA papers found.

9web searchWebSearch3-FMA 3-fluoromethamphetamine legal status scheduling UK EU US controlled substance10 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Legal status data not available via structured APIs; web sources needed.

10web searchWebSearch3-fluoromethamphetamine EMCDDA new psychoactive substance first appearance market10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Provides history of 3-FMA market appearance and early regulatory notifications.

11document retrievalWebFetchchemical properties 3-FMA1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

CAS number confirmation.

12document retrievalWebFetchdose duration pharmacology effects1 result, 2 selected
selection rationale

Confirms seed data doses and durations from community sources.

13document retrievalWebFetcheffects dose tolerance harm reduction1 result, 2 selected
selection rationale

Additional dosing route data not in seed DB; tolerance data.

14web searchWebSearch3-fluoromethamphetamine CAS 1324717-74-9 SMILES physical properties10 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

SMILES not returned by PubChem API call; obtained via web.

15web searchWebSearch3-fluoromethamphetamine fatality Finland England Wales death10 results, 0 selected
selection rationale

Confirms fatality link but no published case reports identified.

16literature searchPubMedmethamphetamine mechanism VMAT2 dopamine amphetamine annual review1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Essential mechanistic reference for amphetamine class; applicable to 3-FMA.

17literature searchPubMedamphetamine methamphetamine cardiovascular toxicity hypertension tachycardia7 results, 2 selected
selection rationale

Cardiovascular and clinical toxicology data applicable by analog inference.

18literature searchPubMedstimulant overamping overdose management ambulatory protocol1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Directly applicable harm reduction/management guidance for stimulant class overdose.

19literature searchPubMedamphetamine analog enantiomer R S stereochemistry pharmacology0 results
selection rationale

Confirms absence of enantiomer data for 3-FMA.

20literature searchPubMedNPS stimulant wastewater epidemiology Europe prevalence5 results, 1 selected
selection rationale

Epidemiological context for NPS stimulant market; 3-FMA belongs to this category.

21literature searchPubMedstimulant overamping overdose management protocol ambulatory1 result, 1 selected
selection rationale

Evidence-based stimulant overdose management applicable to 3-FMA.

22cross referenceMultipleCross-reference seed data vs published data— results
selection rationale

Systematic verification of all seed data fields.

23data extractionMultiple PubMed papersExtract key quantitative values for 3-FMA— results
selection rationale

All key pharmacological quantitative data extracted for research output.

Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 3-FMA (3-Fluoromethamphetamine)

**Substance:** 3-FMA | PSX-0045 | IUPAC: 1-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-methylpropan-2-amine  
**Research date:** 2026-05-07  
**Readiness tier:** Sparse/emerging (< 0.3) — primarily rodent studies; no published human clinical data

---

## Chemical Identity

### Verified Data

| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| IUPAC name | 1-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-methylpropan-2-amine | PubChem CID 58216164 [Ref 1 in registry implies structure] |
| PubChem CID | 58216164 | PubChem API |
| CAS number | 1324717-74-9 (HCl salt) | Cayman Chemical [Ref 17] |
| Molecular formula | C₁₀H₁₄FN | PubChem API |
| Molecular weight | 167.22 g/mol (free base) | PubChem API |
| InChIKey | RRVAUTPWWWFYQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem API |
| SMILES | CC(CC1=CC(=CC=C1)F)NC | PubChem/web |

### Structural Notes

3-FMA is a fluorinated methamphetamine analog in which fluorine is substituted at the meta (3) position of the phenyl ring. It possesses a chiral center at the alpha carbon, producing R and S enantiomers; commercial samples and street product are typically sold as the racemate. No published data specifically comparing the pharmacology of the individual enantiomers was identified.

### Seed Data Discrepancies

- **SMILES, PubChem CID:** Missing from seed data — now confirmed.
- **Molecular formula and weight:** Missing from seed data — now confirmed.
- **InChIKey:** Missing from seed data — now confirmed.
- All other chemical identity data in the brief matches published sources.

**⚠ FLAG:** No enantiomer-specific pharmacology data is available in the published literature. The brief does not address stereochemistry; generation agent should note the racemate issue.

---

## Pharmacology

### Mechanism of Action

3-FMA is a substituted methamphetamine analog that functions as a monoamine releasing agent. Based on its structural class and direct rodent evidence, its primary mechanism involves:

1. **VMAT2 displacement:** Amphetamine-class compounds enter presynaptic terminals via DAT/NET, then disrupt the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT2), redistributing monoamines from vesicles to cytoplasm (Fleckenstein et al. 2007 [Ref 12]).
2. **Reverse transport:** Elevated cytoplasmic monoamine concentrations drive efflux through DAT, NET, and SERT operating in reverse, flooding the synapse with dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin (Fleckenstein et al. 2007 [Ref 12]).
3. **Weak base effects:** Amphetamines alkalinize vesicular pH, further disrupting monoamine storage (Fleckenstein et al. 2007 [Ref 12]).

#### Evidence for 3-FMA Specifically

- Neurotoxicity studies confirm that 3-FMA produces **dopaminergic impairments** — decreased DA levels, decreased TH expression, decreased DAT expression, decreased VMAT2 expression, and increased DA turnover — consistent with a vesicle-displacing monoamine releasing mechanism (Nguyen et al. 2018 [Ref 2]).
- Dopamine D1 receptor activation is critically involved in both 3-FMA's rewarding properties and its neurotoxicity. SCH23390 (D1 antagonist), but not sulpiride (D2 antagonist), significantly attenuated 3-FMA-induced neurotoxicity, distinguishing its mechanistic profile from methamphetamine (where D2 receptor plays a larger role) (Nguyen et al. 2018 [Ref 2]).
- 3-FMA produced conditioned place preference and high-breakpoint intravenous self-administration in rodents, behavior driven by dopamine release in the mesolimbic system (Ryu et al. 2020 [Ref 1]).

#### Positional Isomer Comparison

- **4-FMA** (para-fluorinated isomer): Published in vitro data confirms it releases NE, DA, and 5-HT at comparable potency to MDMA, with enhanced serotonergic activity relative to unfluorinated methamphetamine. TAAR1 binding is also reported (Rickli et al. 2015 [Ref 7]).
- **4-FA, 3-fluoro-methcathinone**: Confirmed monoamine substrates at all three transporters (DAT, NET, SERT) (Eshleman et al. 2017 [Ref 15]).
- **3-FMA vs 4-FMA**: The meta (3) position is expected to produce **lower serotonergic relative to dopaminergic activity** than the para isomer. Para-substitution consistently enhances serotonergic properties in the phenethylamine class (Rickli et al. 2015 [Ref 7]). This predicts 3-FMA has a more dopamine/norepinephrine-dominant profile than 4-FMA.

**⚠ FLAG:** No published in vitro Ki, IC₅₀, or EC₅₀ values for 3-FMA at DAT, NET, or SERT have been identified. All transporter selectivity claims for 3-FMA itself rest on structural analog inference. The generation agent must label any transporter potency estimates as inferred, not substance-specific.

### Behavioral Pharmacology

#### Locomotor Stimulation (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 5])
- 3-FMA produced **time- and dose-dependent locomotor stimulation** in Swiss-Webster mice.
- Peak locomotor effect: **5,905–7,758 counts**, which is comparable to methamphetamine at peak.
- ED₅₀ for locomotor stimulation: 3-FMA falls in the mid-range among fluoromethamphetamine isomers tested (rank order across all analogs: 2-FMA > methamphetamine > 3-FMA = 3-FA = 2-FMA > 4-FMA; ED₅₀ range 0.38–7.38 mg/kg across all compounds tested).

#### Discriminative Stimulus (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 5])
- 3-FMA produced **full substitution** for methamphetamine in a two-lever food-maintained discriminative stimulus procedure in Sprague-Dawley rats.
- ED₅₀ for methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus: **0.32–0.71 mg/kg** range (across fluorinated analogs; all showed comparable potency).
- This confirms 3-FMA produces interoceptive cues indistinguishable from methamphetamine.

#### Rewarding and Reinforcing Properties (Ryu et al. 2020 [Ref 1])
- **Conditioned place preference (CPP):** IP administration at 10 and 30 mg/kg produced significant place preference in mice.
- **Intravenous self-administration (FR):** Drug-taking behavior at 0.1 mg/kg/infusion during 2 hr sessions (fixed ratio schedule).
- **Progressive ratio:** High breakpoints at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion during 6 hr sessions — comparable to known drugs of abuse.
- **Reinstatement:** Priming injections of 3-FMA (0.4 mg/kg i.v.), METH (0.2 mg/kg i.v.), or cocaine (2.0 mg/kg i.v.) all reinstated 3-FMA-seeking behavior after extinction. This cross-reinstatement pattern mirrors that of conventional stimulants.

### Pharmacokinetics

**No published human pharmacokinetic studies for 3-FMA were identified.**

By structural analog inference from related fluorinated methamphetamines:

- **Route:** Primarily oral and intranasal (community sources [Ref 10, 11]).
- **Metabolism:** Methamphetamine-class compounds are metabolized primarily by **CYP2D6** (N-demethylation). The ring-positioned fluorine on 3-FMA may inhibit aromatic hydroxylation (a minor methamphetamine metabolic route), potentially shifting metabolism toward aliphatic routes. Studies on ring-substituted methamphetamine analogs (PMMA) confirm CYP2D6 importance for N-demethylation and aromatic hydroxylation; genetic CYP2D6 variants significantly affect exposure (Vevelstad et al. 2017 [Ref 18]).
- **Fluoro metabolite formation:** For 2-FMA, metabolic pathways include N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation; the ring fluorine is stable to metabolic defluorination under normal conditions (Ishii et al. 2023 [Ref 8]).
- **Duration of action:** Community data places oral duration at 3–7 hours total (onset 20–60 min, peak 2–4 hr, aftereffects 6–12 hr) [Ref 10, 11]. This is broadly consistent with methamphetamine pharmacokinetics (plasma half-life ~10 hr for methamphetamine, but 3-FMA duration appears shorter, consistent with modified metabolism).

**⚠ FLAG (Safety-critical):** All pharmacokinetic claims are inferred from structural analogs. No published Tmax, Cmax, t½, bioavailability, or volume of distribution data for 3-FMA in humans exists. This must be explicitly stated in the article.

---

## History

3-FMA is a **synthetic stimulant** that was developed as a research chemical and subsequently appeared on global designer drug markets. It is not derived from any traditional plant or pharmaceutical, and has no documented therapeutic use.

**Market appearance timeline (based on regulatory notifications and web-retrieved sources [Ref 9]):**
- **Finland, ~2009:** First reported regulatory notification of 3-FMA.
- **United States, ~2011:** Regulatory or law enforcement notification.
- **China and New Zealand, 2015–2016:** Addition to controlled substance lists.
- **Europe:** Germany's NpSG (November 2016) covers substituted amphetamines including 3-FMA.

3-FMA belongs to a family of fluorinated phenethylamine NPS that arose in the early-to-mid 2010s alongside 2-FMA, 4-FA, 4-FMA, and related analogs. These were marketed online as "research chemicals" or "designer drugs," with the fluorine substitution originally serving to evade blanket scheduling of methamphetamine.

**⚠ FLAG:** No peer-reviewed source has been identified that documents a specific discovery date, synthesis origin, or founding researcher for 3-FMA. The history section must rely on regulatory notification dates and should be labeled as such.

---

## Subjective Effects

**No controlled human dosing studies exist for 3-FMA.** All subjective effect descriptions derive from community harm reduction sources (KnowDrugs [Ref 10], PsychonautWiki [Ref 11]) and are not corroborated by published clinical data.

### Effects Reported by Community Sources

**Positive/desired:**
- Euphoria
- Increased energy and alertness
- Wakefulness
- Increased sociability and communication
- Mood elevation
- Reduced appetite
- Stimulation (physical and cognitive)
- Focus enhancement
- Motivation enhancement
- Music enhancement
- Touch enhancement (tactile enhancement)

**Negative/undesired (also from community sources):**
- Appetite suppression (often undesired at high doses)
- Excessive sweating
- Bruxism (teeth grinding)
- Insomnia
- Post-stimulant depression/fatigue (aftereffects phase)
- Anxiety and irritability (especially at high doses or comedown)
- Compulsive redosing urge
- Cardiovascular effects (palpitations, abnormal heartbeat)

The seed effect profile (22 effects listed, all with missing intensity/frequency values) broadly aligns with this community-reported picture. No published controlled study evidence is available to assign intensity or frequency values.

### Duration (Community Sources [Ref 10, 11])
- **Onset:** 20–60 minutes (oral)
- **Come-up:** 30–60 minutes
- **Peak:** 2–4 hours
- **Offset:** 1–3 hours
- **After effects:** 6–12 hours
- **Total duration:** 3–7 hours

These values are consistent with and confirm the seed data in the brief. No contradictions identified.

**⚠ FLAG:** Seed data duration and dose ranges are sourced from community consensus (PsychonautWiki/KnowDrugs), not controlled clinical studies. This limitation must be disclosed in the article. Values appear internally consistent but should be labeled as community-derived.

---

## Safety & Toxicity

### Animal Lethality

Nguyen et al. (2018) [Ref 2] established that 3-FMA produces **dose-dependent mortality in mice** at i.p. doses of 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg. This is a critical finding establishing acute lethality potential, though direct translation of these rodent doses to human equivalents is not possible.

- At **40 mg/kg i.p.** (a non-universally lethal dose in this study), mice showed:
  - Significant **hyperthermia**
  - **Oxidative stress** markers
  - **Microgliosis** (microglial activation to M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype)
  - **Pro-apoptotic changes** (TUNEL-positive cells)
  - Dopaminergic impairment (↓ TH, ↓ DAT, ↓ VMAT2, ↑ DA turnover)

These neurotoxic effects were **comparable in magnitude to methamphetamine** at equimolar doses (Nguyen et al. 2018 [Ref 2]).

**⚠ FLAG (Safety-critical):** No LD₅₀ values in humans, and no human clinical toxicology data, have been published for 3-FMA. The seed data toxicity characterization ("Acute: moderate; Chronic: moderate" with the note "Inferred from pharmacological class — not sourced from literature") is consistent with the animal evidence but remains unverified against human data. Generation agent must label this accordingly.

### Human Fatalities

3-FMA has been **linked to fatalities in Finland and England/Wales** based on regulatory and forensic reports referenced in Anchondo et al. (2025) [Ref 5] and Wikipedia [Ref 9]. However, **no peer-reviewed published case reports or case series specifically documenting 3-FMA-associated human deaths were identified** in PubMed searches. This is a significant gap.

**⚠ FLAG (Safety-critical):** The fatality link is real but the published clinical documentation is absent from indexed literature. The article should note that human fatalities have been reported to regulatory bodies without citing specific peer-reviewed case reports, as none were found.

### Cardiovascular Risks

By structural analogy with methamphetamine (Annawald et al. 2024 [Ref 13]; Schep et al. 2010 [Ref 14]):
- Excessive catecholamine release → vasoconstriction, tachycardia, hypertension
- Acute risks: hypertensive crisis, arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia
- Chronic risks: cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension
- Hyperthermia as a compound toxicity factor

All cardiovascular claims are inferred from methamphetamine class data, not 3-FMA-specific evidence.

### Neurotoxicity Mechanism

The dopaminergic neurotoxicity of 3-FMA proceeds via D1 receptor-dependent mechanisms (distinct from methamphetamine's larger D2 receptor involvement). The sequence is:
1. Massive dopamine release (VMAT2 displacement)
2. D1 receptor activation
3. Microglial M1 activation (neuroinflammation)
4. Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species generation
5. Apoptotic cell death

(Nguyen et al. 2018 [Ref 2])

---

## Harm Reduction

### Dose Caution

No controlled human safety data exists. Animal studies show dose-dependent lethality. Community dose ranges (oral common: 20–35 mg) should be treated as approximate — individual sensitivity, body weight, tolerance, and route of administration all affect response.

### Hyperthermia Risk

Hyperthermia is a leading mechanism of amphetamine-class stimulant toxicity. Avoiding hot environments, maintaining hydration, and not engaging in strenuous physical activity significantly reduces acute toxicity risk (inferred from methamphetamine class data [Ref 13]).

### Stimulant Overamping Protocol

For acute stimulant intoxication presenting clinically, evidence-based management includes:
1. Behavioral intervention first: reduce external stimuli, verbal de-escalation
2. Benzodiazepines (second-line)
3. Antipsychotics (third-line)
(Tilhou et al. 2026 [Ref 16])

### Testing Recommendations

Fluorinated methamphetamine isomers (2-FMA, 3-FMA, 4-FMA) are difficult to distinguish by standard immunoassay drug screens — cross-reactivity with methamphetamine tests is expected. GC-MS or LC-MS/MS with isomer-specific reference standards is required for definitive identification (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 5]; Ishii et al. 2023 [Ref 8]).

### Compulsive Redosing

The rodent self-administration data demonstrates robust reinforcing properties and reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior (Ryu et al. 2020 [Ref 1]). Compulsive redosing is a documented risk; users should be aware of rapidly escalating urges to re-dose.

### Contraindications

Based on class-level evidence:
- **MAOIs** (including moclobemide, phenelzine, selegiline, harmine, harmaline): Potentially life-threatening interaction via serotonin toxicity (serotonin syndrome) and/or hypertensive crisis. No published 3-FMA-specific interaction study found; inference from methamphetamine class.
- **Lithium:** Lowers seizure threshold in combination with stimulants.
- **Cardiovascular conditions:** Absolute contraindication given catecholamine-releasing mechanism.

**⚠ FLAG (Safety-critical):** No published drug interaction studies specific to 3-FMA exist. All contraindications are class-level inferences from methamphetamine pharmacology.

---

## Tolerance & Dependence

### Tolerance

- Community data indicates tolerance half-life of approximately **3–7 days** [Ref 10].
- Full tolerance develops with "prolonged and repeated use" [Ref 10].
- Cross-tolerance with other monoamine releasers (amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA) is expected by class, though no substance-specific cross-tolerance data for 3-FMA was identified.

### Dependence and Withdrawal

The closely related **3-fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA)** — differing only in N-ethyl vs N-methyl substitution — demonstrates physical dependence potential:
- Repeated administration (1 and 10 mg/kg i.p., twice daily for 7 days) produced significant withdrawal behavior scores at 16 and 40 hours post-cessation in mice.
- Withdrawal manifested as **hyperactivity** and **depression-like behavior** (increased immobility in forced swim test).
- The study explicitly concluded: "findings indicate that 3-FEA administration may lead to physical dependence" (Jo et al. 2024 [Ref 6]).

This is the most directly applicable analog evidence for 3-FMA dependence liability. Direct 3-FMA withdrawal studies in animals have not been published.

### Abuse Liability

The evidence base clearly establishes high abuse liability for 3-FMA:
- Robust self-administration in rodents (FR and PR schedules) [Ref 1]
- High-breakpoint progressive ratio performance [Ref 1]
- Full methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus [Ref 5]
- Reinstatement by methamphetamine and cocaine [Ref 1]

**⚠ FLAG:** No published human addiction/dependence case reports for 3-FMA were identified.

---

## Interactions

**No published drug interaction studies specific to 3-FMA exist.** All interactions are class-level inferences.

| Interaction | Mechanism | Severity | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAOIs | Serotonin toxicity + hypertensive crisis from unmetabolized monoamines | Potentially fatal | Class inference only |
| SSRIs/SNRIs | Additive serotonergic effects; serotonin syndrome risk | Severe | Class inference |
| Other stimulants | Additive cardiovascular burden; hyperthermia | Severe | Class inference |
| Alcohol | May mask sedation, increase cardiovascular strain, worsen dehydration | Moderate | Class inference |
| Lithium | Lowers seizure threshold | Moderate | Class inference |
| Cannabis | Unpredictable anxiety augmentation at higher doses | Mild-moderate | Class inference |

**⚠ FLAG (Safety-critical):** Every interaction listed is inferred from methamphetamine/amphetamine class data. No 3-FMA-specific interaction data exists. Must be labeled as such in the article.

---

## Legal Status

| Jurisdiction | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | Schedule I controlled substance | Since 1996; controlled as methamphetamine analog |
| China | Controlled substance | Since October 2015 |
| United Kingdom | Covered by Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 | Blanket ban on novel psychoactives; supply/production prohibited |
| Germany | Controlled under NpSG | New Psychoactive Substances Act, effective November 2016; covers substituted amphetamine family |
| United States | Not explicitly scheduled | Federal Analogue Act (FAA, 21 USC § 813) potentially applies if sold for human consumption; no explicit DEA scheduling found |
| Australia | Unclear / likely prohibited | 4-FMA is Schedule 9 (prohibited); 3-FMA specific status not confirmed |
| Sweden | Classified as hazardous goods | Under Act on Chemical Weapons (Produktsäkerhetslagen); specific scheduling date not confirmed |

Sources: Wikipedia [Ref 9]; web searches confirmed Canada 1996 and China 2015; UK PSA 2016 and Germany NpSG 2016 confirmed via secondary sources.

**⚠ FLAG:** US scheduling status is not explicitly confirmed — the Federal Analogue Act may apply but 3-FMA is not on the DEA's List of Scheduled Controlled Substances. Australia status not confirmed for 3-FMA specifically. A dedicated legal database search (DEA, TGA) would be required for definitive confirmation.

---

## Clinical Trials

**No clinical trials for 3-FMA were found on ClinicalTrials.gov.** Search returned zero results. This is expected for a Schedule I-equivalent NPS with no therapeutic applications.

---

## Community Feedback Analysis

**No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief.** No feedback items to evaluate.

---

## Gaps & Flags

### Critical Data Absent from Published Literature

1. **No human pharmacokinetic data** — Tmax, Cmax, t½, bioavailability, volume of distribution: all unknown. Stated as "not sourced from literature" in seed data.

2. **No published Ki/EC₅₀/IC₅₀ values for 3-FMA specifically** at DAT, NET, or SERT. All transporter pharmacology is inferred from structural analogs (4-FMA, 4-FA, 3-FPM).

3. **No published human case reports or case series** — the factual fatality link in Finland and England/Wales appears in regulatory and secondary sources, but no peer-reviewed clinical documentation of individual cases was found.

4. **No LD₅₀ in humans** — only dose-dependent rodent mortality data exists (Nguyen et al. 2018 [Ref 2]).

5. **No controlled human dosing studies** — dose ranges and duration data derive entirely from community harm reduction databases (PsychonautWiki, KnowDrugs).

6. **No enantiomer pharmacology** — 3-FMA has a chiral center; no R vs S pharmacology data exists.

7. **No specific metabolite identification in human samples** — only analog inference from 2-FMA and PMMA metabolism studies.

8. **No published MAOI, SSRI, or stimulant-combination interaction studies** for 3-FMA.

### Safety-Critical Flags for Human Review

- **Seed toxicity data** ("Acute: moderate; Chronic: moderate") is labeled as inferred, consistent with animal data, but not human-sourced. ✓ Flag preserved.
- **Dose data** sourced from community consensus, not clinical trials. ✓ Values appear reasonable and consistent; no contradiction found, but editorial note required.
- **Duration data** similarly community-sourced and consistent with brief. ✓ No contradiction.
- **Fatality link** documented but no peer-reviewed case reports found — generation agent should not imply false precision about fatality circumstances.
- **Legal status (US, Australia)** — not fully confirmed. Generation agent should use hedged language ("may be covered under…").

### Contradictions Between Sources

No direct contradictions were found between seed data and published sources. The oral dose ranges and duration values in the seed database match community harm reduction databases exactly.

### Structural Analog Inference Dependency

The following sections rely **primarily on structural analog inference**, not 3-FMA-specific data:
- Transporter pharmacology (DAT/NET/SERT selectivity ratios)
- Human pharmacokinetics and metabolism
- CYP enzyme involvement
- Drug interaction profile
- Cardiovascular risk profile
- Tolerance mechanism
- MAOI interaction severity

All of these must be labeled explicitly in the generated article as analog-inferred, not substance-specific findings.