2C-T
4-(methylthio)-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 20 mg | 20 mg | medium |
| Low | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | medium |
| Common | 60–100 mg | 60–100 mg | medium |
| Strong | 100–120 mg | 100–120 mg | medium |
| Heavy | 125+ mg | 125+ mg | medium |
| Editorial | Common/strong range (60–120 mg) supported by PiHKAL Entry #39 which documents 60–100 mg with effects at 100–125 mg. Threshold (20 mg) and light tier (40–60 mg) are PsychonautWiki community consensus extrapolations not present in PiHKAL. Heavy boundary (125+ mg) from community consensus. Existing DB values carried forward unchanged. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommon/strong range (60–120 mg) supported by PiHKAL Entry #39 which documents 60–100 mg with effects at 100–125 mg. Threshold (20 mg) and light tier (40–60 mg) are PsychonautWiki community consensus extrapolations not present in PiHKAL. Heavy boundary (125+ mg) from community consensus. Existing DB values carried forward unchanged. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| After effectstrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | medium |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki lists aftereffects 1–2 hours. PiHKAL and Erowid report describe good sleep and residual well-being, consistent with mild brief aftereffects. Existing DB value carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki lists aftereffects 1–2 hours. PiHKAL and Erowid report describe good sleep and residual well-being, consistent with mild brief aftereffects. Existing DB value carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 30–45 minutes | 30–45 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki lists 30–45 min onset. Erowid report shows onset at ~40 min. PiHKAL does not specify onset time explicitly but is consistent. Supported by multiple sources. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki lists 30–45 min onset. Erowid report shows onset at ~40 min. PiHKAL does not specify onset time explicitly but is consistent. Supported by multiple sources. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | No published come_up data for 2C-T. Estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (come_up ~15–30 min for oral phenethylamines). Work-notes specify proposing with confidence=low. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published come_up data for 2C-T. Estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (come_up ~15–30 min for oral phenethylamines). Work-notes specify proposing with confidence=low. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 30–115 minutes | 30–115 minutes | medium |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki lists peak 30–115 min. Erowid report suggests peak around 1h10min from onset. Wide range reflects sparse data and individual variability. Existing DB value carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki lists peak 30–115 min. Erowid report suggests peak around 1h10min from onset. Wide range reflects sparse data and individual variability. Existing DB value carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | medium |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki lists offset 1–2 hours. Consistent with total duration of 3–6 hours minus onset+peak phases. Existing DB value carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki lists offset 1–2 hours. Consistent with total duration of 3–6 hours minus onset+peak phases. Existing DB value carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 3–6 hours | 3–6 hours | medium |
| Editorial | PiHKAL gives 3–5 hours; PsychonautWiki community consensus expands to 3–6 hours. Erowid report shows baseline at ~5 hours. Using wider community range. Existing DB value carried forward. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPiHKAL gives 3–5 hours; PsychonautWiki community consensus expands to 3–6 hours. Erowid report shows baseline at ~5 hours. Using wider community range. Existing DB value carried forward. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | negligible | negligible | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, neurological | cardiovascular, neurological | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify acute=low, chronic=negligible, confidence=low. All toxicity data extrapolated from 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 (Dean et al. 2013, Luethi et al. 2018). 2C-T's lower potency and minimal market presence suggest lower acute risk than congeners, but this is inference. Evidence discount applied: no substance-specific data exist. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify acute=low, chronic=negligible, confidence=low. All toxicity data extrapolated from 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 (Dean et al. 2013, Luethi et al. 2018). 2C-T's lower potency and minimal market presence suggest lower acute risk than congeners, but this is inference. Evidence discount applied: no substance-specific data exist. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify physical=none, psychological=negligible, compulsive redosing=negligible, dose escalation=negligible, confidence=medium. Class-level inference from serotonergic hallucinogens; no substance-specific dependence data. Supported by Luethi et al. 2018 (Ki > 4,000 nM at monoamine transporters) confirming no dopaminergic reinforcement. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify physical=none, psychological=negligible, compulsive redosing=negligible, dose escalation=negligible, confidence=medium. Class-level inference from serotonergic hallucinogens; no substance-specific dependence data. Supported by Luethi et al. 2018 (Ki > 4,000 nM at monoamine transporters) confirming no dopaminergic reinforcement. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. 5-HT₂A agonists do not produce physiological dependence requiring compensatory adaptation. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome documented for any serotonergic psychedelic. 5-HT₂A agonists do not produce physiological dependence requiring compensatory adaptation. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 3 days | 3 days | medium |
| Full Reset | 7 days | 7 days | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT | LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify rapid buildup, 3-day half-life, 7-day full reset, cross-tolerance with psychedelic class. Values from PsychonautWiki community consensus; mechanism from class pharmacology (β-arrestin–mediated 5-HT₂A internalization). No 2C-T-specific tolerance data published. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify rapid buildup, 3-day half-life, 7-day full reset, cross-tolerance with psychedelic class. Values from PsychonautWiki community consensus; mechanism from class pharmacology (β-arrestin–mediated 5-HT₂A internalization). No 2C-T-specific tolerance data published. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| other MAO inhibitorstrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Work-notes list MAOIs as absolute contraindication. Mechanism supported by Jacob & Shulgin 1981 (MAO substrate), Wagmann et al. 2019 (class MAO data), and Rached et al. 2026 (MAOI+psychedelic interaction risk). No 2C-T-specific case data, but class-level risk is well-established. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list MAOIs as absolute contraindication. Mechanism supported by Jacob & Shulgin 1981 (MAO substrate), Wagmann et al. 2019 (class MAO data), and Rached et al. 2026 (MAOI+psychedelic interaction risk). No 2C-T-specific case data, but class-level risk is well-established. | |||
| neurological Lithiumtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes list lithium as absolute contraindication with medium confidence. Class-level seizure risk from LSD/psilocybin case reports. No 2C-T-specific evidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list lithium as absolute contraindication with medium confidence. Class-level seizure risk from LSD/psilocybin case reports. No 2C-T-specific evidence. | |||
| psychiatric Psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes list psychotic disorders as absolute contraindication with medium confidence (class inference). Standard serotonergic psychedelic contraindication supported by extensive class literature. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list psychotic disorders as absolute contraindication with medium confidence (class inference). Standard serotonergic psychedelic contraindication supported by extensive class literature. | |||
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes list cardiovascular disease as relative contraindication with medium confidence. Supported by Dean et al. 2013 class-level sympathomimetic toxidrome data and Luethi et al. 2018 5-HT₂B EC₅₀ 44–370 nM. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list cardiovascular disease as relative contraindication with medium confidence. Supported by Dean et al. 2013 class-level sympathomimetic toxidrome data and Luethi et al. 2018 5-HT₂B EC₅₀ 44–370 nM. | |||
| psychiatric Bipolar disordertrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes list bipolar disorder as relative contraindication with low confidence (class inference). Standard psychedelic class contraindication. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list bipolar disorder as relative contraindication with low confidence (class inference). Standard psychedelic class contraindication. | |||
| other Serotonergic medicationstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes list serotonergic medications as relative contraindication with medium confidence. Supported by Inan et al. 2020 interaction data and class pharmacology. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list serotonergic medications as relative contraindication with medium confidence. Supported by Inan et al. 2020 interaction data and class pharmacology. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancytrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes list pregnancy as relative contraindication with low confidence. No substance-specific or class-specific reproductive data exist; purely precautionary. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list pregnancy as relative contraindication with low confidence. No substance-specific or class-specific reproductive data exist; purely precautionary. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.15) | 1800–2700 sec(i=0.15) | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 900–1800 sec(i=0.45) | 900–1800 sec(i=0.45) | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1800–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 1800–5400 sec(i=1.00) | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.40) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.40) | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.10) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.10) | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 5 phases for oral ROA: onset (0–45 min), come_up (30–75 min), peak (1–2.5 h), resolution (2.5–4.5 h), afterglow (4–6 h) with intensity weights. Duration values derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus (onset 30–45 min, peak 30–115 min, total 3–6 h) cross-referenced with PiHKAL (3–5 h total) and Erowid report (onset ~40 min, peak ~1h10min, baseline ~5h). Come_up phase is estimated from class analogy to 2C-B (confidence low for that phase). Afterglow driving advisory taken verbatim from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
A threshold dose of 2C-T produces minimal perceptible effects — a possible slight shift in mood or body awareness without clear psychedelic character. Some users report a faint sense of bodily lightness or mild emotional coloring, but the experience remains ambiguous and could be attributed to expectation. Physical effects are negligible at this level. No gastrointestinal discomfort, pupil dilation, or tactile changes are expected. Functional capacity is fully preserved. The threshold value (20 mg) is not documented in PiHKAL and derives from community consensus extrapolation. Duration at this level is likely shorter than the full 3–6 hour range reported at common doses.
Work-notes specify threshold ~110 words. 20 mg threshold from PsychonautWiki community consensus, not PiHKAL. No direct experimental evidence for sub-active doses of 2C-T.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes specify threshold ~110 words. 20 mg threshold from PsychonautWiki community consensus, not PiHKAL. No direct experimental evidence for sub-active doses of 2C-T.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At light doses (40–60 mg), 2C-T produces mild mood elevation and a subtle increase in tactile sensitivity. A gentle introspective quality emerges — thoughts may feel slightly more fluid or emotionally tinged — but there is no significant visual component. Social function and verbal communication remain fully intact. Physically, mild body awareness develops. Some users notice faint stomach pressure or warmth, though gastrointestinal discomfort is generally absent at this range. The sedating character of 2C-T begins to become apparent, distinguishing it from the stimulating quality of most phenethylamine psychedelics. Duration is expected at the shorter end of the 3–6 hour range. Sleep quality is typically unaffected or mildly improved.
Work-notes outline light tier as mild mood elevation, subtle tactile enhancement, no significant visuals. 40–60 mg range from PsychonautWiki. PiHKAL does not document effects below 60 mg explicitly; light tier is community extrapolation.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline light tier as mild mood elevation, subtle tactile enhancement, no significant visuals. 40–60 mg range from PsychonautWiki. PiHKAL does not document effects below 60 mg explicitly; light tier is community extrapolation.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
The common dose range (60–100 mg) represents the core 2C-T experience as documented in PiHKAL. Tactile sensitivity becomes clearly noticeable — touch feels enhanced and surfaces more textured. Introspection deepens, with emotional openness and a gentle empathogenic quality. Thoughts flow more freely, and aesthetic appreciation may be heightened. Verbal communication remains easy and natural; one PiHKAL subject described the state as one that "opens things up but doesn't get in the way." Visual effects are minimal at common doses — mild color enhancement or saturation may be noticed, but geometric patterns and morphing are largely absent. The dominant body load is gastrointestinal: a persistent stomach pressure that some users find mildly uncomfortable. The overall character is sedating rather than stimulating, described as "stoning." Total duration is 3–5 hours, with good sleep and residual well-being commonly reported afterward. This is the PiHKAL-documented range and the best-characterized tier for 2C-T.
Work-notes specify common tier as core experience with tactile sensitivity, introspection, emotional openness, mild GI discomfort, minimal visuals. Supported by PiHKAL 60–100 mg range (n=4 accounts) and Erowid report (85 mg). The best-evidenced tier for this substance.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes specify common tier as core experience with tactile sensitivity, introspection, emotional openness, mild GI discomfort, minimal visuals. Supported by PiHKAL 60–100 mg range (n=4 accounts) and Erowid report (85 mg). The best-evidenced tier for this substance.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At strong doses (100–120 mg), full psychedelic effects emerge more clearly. Introspection becomes more pronounced, with deeper emotional processing and possible periods of emotional detachment — one PiHKAL subject at 75 mg described a sensation like "a hooded cloak brought down over my head," suggesting dysphoric responses may appear even below this range. Mild visual enhancement becomes more apparent: color saturation increases, and subtle drifting or breathing of surfaces may be noticed. Body load intensifies at this tier. Stomach pressure becomes more persistent, and some users experience nausea. The sedating quality deepens, with increased physical heaviness. Duration may extend toward the longer end of the 3–6 hour range. Emotional lability is possible. Users should be prepared for shifting emotional states and ensure a comfortable, supportive setting.
Work-notes outline strong tier with more pronounced introspection, mild visual enhancement, increased body load, emotional detachment. PiHKAL documents 100–125 mg experiences with psychedelic properties and stomach discomfort. Upper boundary approaches heavy range.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline strong tier with more pronounced introspection, mild visual enhancement, increased body load, emotional detachment. PiHKAL documents 100–125 mg experiences with psychedelic properties and stomach discomfort. Upper boundary approaches heavy range.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Heavy doses (125+ mg) produce an intensified psychedelic state that exceeds the range documented in PiHKAL. Gastrointestinal distress becomes the dose-limiting factor — nausea and stomach discomfort may become pronounced. Visual effects are more apparent than at lower tiers but remain less intense than those produced by congeners like 2C-T-2 or 2C-T-7 at equivalent potency-adjusted doses. Psychological distress becomes more likely: anxiety, confusion, thought loops, and temporary disorientation may occur. The sedating body state intensifies, and motor coordination may be mildly impaired. Emotional processing can become overwhelming. This range is poorly documented — no PiHKAL accounts exceed 125 mg, and community reports at heavy doses are essentially absent. The risk-benefit profile is unfavorable given 2C-T's limited visual and psychedelic ceiling relative to body load escalation.
Work-notes specify heavy tier as intensified state with increased GI distress, anxiety, confusion, and visual effects still less than congeners. Not well-documented — extrapolated from dose-response trajectory. No PiHKAL data above 125 mg.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes specify heavy tier as intensified state with increased GI distress, anxiety, confusion, and visual effects still less than congeners. Not well-documented — extrapolated from dose-response trajectory. No PiHKAL data above 125 mg.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateUse of the head-twitch response to investigate the structure-activity relationships of 4-thio-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenylalkylaminesHalberstadt AL, Luethi D, Hoener MC, Trachsel D, Brandt SD, Liechti ME · 2023 · Psychopharmacology
- [2]moderateSulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents. Monothio analogues of mescaline and isomescaline.Jacob P, Shulgin AT · 1981 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 73108126 claims checked2 verified2 partial2 inconclusive
- [3]strong2C or Not 2C: Phenethylamine Designer Drug ReviewDean BV, Stellpflug SJ, Burnett A, Engebretsen KM · 2013 · Journal of Medical Toxicology
- [4]strongSafety and Efficacy of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors in Patients Who Use Psychoactive SubstancesRached G, Campana A, Fiani D, et al. · 2026 · CNS Drugs
- [5]moderateMonoamine receptor interaction profiles of 4-thio-substituted phenethylamines (2C-T drugs)Luethi D, Trachsel D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2018 · Neuropharmacology
- [6]moderateInteractions of phenethylamine-derived psychoactive substances of the 2C-series with human monoamine oxidasesWagmann L, Brandt SD, Stratford A, Maurer HH, Meyer MR · 2019 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [7]moderateSulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents. 2. Analogues of (2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)- and (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenyl)isopropylamine.Jacob P, Shulgin AT · 1983 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 68425151 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [8]moderateSulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents. 3. Ethyl homologues of mescaline and their monothio analogues.Jacob P, Shulgin AT · 1984 · Journal of Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 67374311 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [9]weakSchedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine and N-Benzylpiperazine Into Schedule IDEA · 2004linkno claims checked
- [10]moderateLegal highs: staying on top of the flood of novel psychoactive substancesBaumeister D, Tojo LM, Tracy DK · 2015 · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
- [11]weak
- [12]weakPiHKAL Entry #39: 2C-T (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylthiophenethylamine)Shulgin AT, Shulgin A · 1991linkno claims checked
- [13]weak
- [14]moderateAcute Pharmacological Effects of 2C-B in Humans: An Observational StudyPapaseit E, Farre M, Perez-Mana C, Torrens M, Ventura M, Pujadas M, de la Torre R, Gonzalez D · 2018 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [15]moderateCorrelation between the potency of hallucinogens in the mouse head-twitch response assay and their behavioral and subjective effects in other speciesHalberstadt AL, Chatha M, Klein AK, Wallach J, Brandt SD · 2020 · Neuropharmacology
- [16]moderatePsychedelics and the human receptoromeRay TS · 2010 · PLoS ONE
- [17]strongAssessment of the Acute Effects of 2C-B vs. Psilocybin on Subjective Experience, Mood, and CognitionMallaroni P, Mason NL, Reckweg JT, Paci R, Ritscher S, Toennes SW, Theunissen EL, Kuypers KPC, Ramaekers JG · 2023 · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- [18]strongNovel Phenethylamines and Their Potential Interactions With Prescription Drugs: A Systematic Critical ReviewInan F, Brunt TM, Contrucci RR, Hondebrink L, Franssen EJF · 2020 · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary8 claims3verified4partial1inconclusive
partialWith a 5-HT₂A binding affinity of Ki = 49 nM — approximately ten-fold weaker than its ethylthio and propylthio congeners — 2C-T is the least potent member of the series, active at oral doses of 60–100 mg with a total duration of 3–6 hours.[1]model confidence 85%
Ki=49 nM is directly confirmed. However, the claim that 2C-T is 'approximately ten-fold weaker than its ethylthio' congener is materially wrong: 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM gives a ~5.4x ratio, not 10x (the ~10x ratio holds for propylthio/2C-T-7 at Ki=5.3 nM). Additionally, the oral doses (60–100 mg) and duration (3–6 hours) are not present in the abstract.
2C-T 5-HT2A Ki=49 nM; 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM; 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM. Increasing alkylthio chain length markedly increases potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveAlexander Shulgin synthesized 2C-T as part of a systematic investigation of sulfur-substituted phenethylamines; the first peer-reviewed report appeared in 1981[2]model confidence 80%
The abstract describes monothio analogues of mescaline and isomescaline but does not name Shulgin, does not mention 2C-T specifically, and does not confirm the 1981 publication date. The abstract is about the right general topic but lacks enough detail to verify these specific claims.
Two monothio analogues of mescaline and three monothio analogues of isomescaline synthesized and characterized.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partial2C-T acts as a partial agonist at 5-HT₂A receptors (Ki = 49 nM; mouse head-twitch response ED₅₀ = 13.8 µmol/kg), with negligible monoamine transporter affinity (Ki > 4,000 nM) distinguishing it from stimulant phenethylamines[1]model confidence 85%
Ki=49 nM and ED50=13.8 µmol/kg are directly confirmed. However, the specific transporter data (Ki > 4,000 nM) is not present in this abstract — that finding comes from citation [12] (Luethi et al.). Attributing transporter data to this citation cannot be verified from the abstract.
2C-T 5-HT2A Ki=49 nM, ED50=13.8 µmol/kg (mouse HTR)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified2C-T acts as a partial agonist at 5-HT₂A receptors (Ki = 49 nM; mouse head-twitch response ED₅₀ = 13.8 µmol/kg), with negligible monoamine transporter affinity (Ki > 4,000 nM) distinguishing it from stimulant phenethylamines[5]model confidence 95%
The abstract directly confirms partial agonism at 5-HT2A and no monoamine transporter activity (Ki >4000 nM). The 5-HT2A Ki range 1–54 nM encompasses 2C-T's Ki=49 nM.
Partial agonists at 5-HT2A/2B. no monoamine transporter activity (Ki >4000 nM).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThe class exhibits weak in vitro MAO inhibitory activity, though 2C-T is more accurately characterized as an MAO substrate than a clinically meaningful inhibitor.[2]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms MAO substrate status ('serve as MAO substrates in vitro'), supporting the second half of the claim. However, it does not address 'weak in vitro MAO inhibitory activity' at all — that is a separate finding from citation [13].
All five compounds serve as MAO substrates in vitro; no correlation between MAO degradation and psychotomimetic potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThe class exhibits weak in vitro MAO inhibitory activity, though 2C-T is more accurately characterized as an MAO substrate than a clinically meaningful inhibitor.[6]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms weak MAO inhibitory activity (IC50 10–125 µM) for the 2C series, supporting the first half of the claim. However, it does not address the 'MAO substrate' characterization specifically, which comes from citation [1].
IC50 values ranged 10-125 microM for MAO-A. MAO inhibition cannot be excluded as pharmacological contributor for 2C-series compounds.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe broader 2C class has been associated with sympathomimetic toxicity and at least five deaths involving higher-potency congeners in polydrug contexts[3]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms at least 5 deaths and sympathomimetic toxicity presentations, matching the claim.
At least 5 deaths reported; excited delirium common among fatalities. Sympathomimetic and serotonin toxicity presentations.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe principal pharmacological risk is potentiation by MAO inhibitors, which slow oxidative deamination[4]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms MAOI + phenethylamines risk (serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency), directly supporting MAOI potentiation as a principal risk. The specific mechanism (oxidative deamination) is standard pharmacology reasonably implied by a comprehensive MAOI interaction review.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
history6 claims1partial5inconclusive
inconclusiveThe foundational chemistry was developed in collaboration with Philip Jacob, with the pair publishing three papers on "Sulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents" in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry between 1981 and 1984[2]model confidence 80%
The abstract does not name Philip Jacob, does not name the journal, and does not confirm the 1981–1984 date range or the total of three papers. The abstract is from the right general research area but lacks the specific bibliographic details.
Two monothio analogues of mescaline and three monothio analogues of isomescaline synthesized and characterized.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveThe foundational chemistry was developed in collaboration with Philip Jacob, with the pair publishing three papers on "Sulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents" in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry between 1981 and 1984[7]model confidence 75%
The title confirms this is Part 2 of the 'Sulfur analogues' series, consistent with a multi-paper series, but the abstract does not confirm Philip Jacob, the journal name, or the 1981–1984 date range.
Thio analogues of DOM and DOET synthesized and evaluated in man.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveThe foundational chemistry was developed in collaboration with Philip Jacob, with the pair publishing three papers on "Sulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents" in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry between 1981 and 1984[8]model confidence 75%
The title confirms this is Part 3 of the 'Sulfur analogues' series, consistent with a multi-paper series, but the abstract does not confirm Philip Jacob, the journal name, or the 1981–1984 date range.
Monothio analogues of mono-, di-, and triethoxy homologues of mescaline synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated in man.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThese papers established the structure-activity relationships for 4-alkylthio-substituted phenethylamines and amphetamines, demonstrating that sulfur substitution at the 4-position of the 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold produced compounds with psychotomimetic activity while also serving as substrates for monoamine oxidase.[2]model confidence 85%
MAO substrate status and psychotomimetic activity at the 4-position are directly confirmed. However, the claim specifies the '2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold,' which is incorrect — the compounds in this paper are monothio analogues of mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold), not the 2,5-dimethoxy scaffold of the 2C series. This is a material factual error.
3- and 4-thiomescaline found to be psychotomimetics in man. All five compounds serve as MAO substrates in vitro.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveWhile 2c-t-2 and 2c-t-7 experienced significant distribution in the late 1990s and 2000s — with 2C-T-7 attracting sufficient regulatory attention to warrant explicit Schedule I placement in the United States in 2004 — 2C-T itself remained largely within psychonaut research communities[3]model confidence 80%
The abstract is a clinical pharmacology and toxicology review and does not address the regulatory history, Schedule I placement, or historical distribution of specific 2C-T congeners.
Reviews pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical effects, and treatment of 2C drug intoxication.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveWhile 2c-t-2 and 2c-t-7 experienced significant distribution in the late 1990s and 2000s — with 2C-T-7 attracting sufficient regulatory attention to warrant explicit Schedule I placement in the United States in 2004 — 2C-T itself remained largely within psychonaut research communities[10]model confidence 80%
The abstract covers NPS including 2C series pharmacodynamics and harm potential but does not address the specific regulatory history, Schedule I placement of 2C-T-7, or the historical distribution of individual 2C-T congeners.
Review of NPS including 2C series. Discusses pharmacodynamics, subjective/physical effects, harm potential.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
chemistry1 claim1verified
verifiedChain extension of the thioether to ethylthio yields 2c-t-2, to n-propylthio yields 2c-t-7, and to butylthio yields 2C-T-19 — each step increasing 5-HT₂A affinity and in vivo potency.[1]model confidence 85%
The chain extension trend (methylthio→ethylthio→propylthio increasing potency) is directly confirmed. 2C-T-19 and butylthio are not specifically named in the abstract but the general SAR principle of increasing chain length increasing potency is confirmed, and 2C-T-19 would be covered under the 12 evaluated compounds.
2C-T Ki=49 nM; 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM; 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM. Increasing alkylthio chain length markedly increases potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacology11 claims10verified1partial
verifiedThe compound binds 5-HT₂A with a Ki of 49 nM, as determined in radioligand displacement assays[1]model confidence 97%
Ki=49 nM is directly confirmed in the abstract. Radioligand displacement is the standard method for Ki determination and is implied by the study design.
2C-T 5-HT2A Ki=49 nM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn the mouse head-twitch response (HTR) — a validated translational model for 5-HT₂A-mediated hallucinogenic activity in humans (correlation r = 0.9448) — 2C-T shows an ED₅₀ of 13.8 µmol/kg (i.p.).[15]model confidence 98%
The r=0.9448 correlation between HTR mouse potencies and human hallucinogenic potencies is directly confirmed in this abstract. This supports the translational validity claim.
Strong positive correlation (r=0.9448) between HTR potencies in mice and reported hallucinogenic potencies in humans across 36 compounds.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn the mouse head-twitch response (HTR) — a validated translational model for 5-HT₂A-mediated hallucinogenic activity in humans (correlation r = 0.9448) — 2C-T shows an ED₅₀ of 13.8 µmol/kg (i.p.).[1]model confidence 98%
ED50=13.8 µmol/kg (mouse HTR) for 2C-T is directly confirmed in the abstract.
2C-T 5-HT2A Ki=49 nM, ED50=13.8 µmol/kg (mouse HTR)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAcross the 2C-T-x class, functional pharmacology reveals partial agonism at both 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂B receptors, with 5-HT₂B EC₅₀ values of 44–370 nM[5]model confidence 98%
Partial agonism at 5-HT2A/2B and 5-HT2B EC50 44–370 nM are both directly stated in the abstract.
5-HT2B EC50 44-370 nM... Partial agonists at 5-HT2A/2B.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedMonoamine transporter affinity is negligible (NET/DAT/SERT Ki > 4,000 nM), clearly distinguishing 2C-T-class compounds from stimulant phenethylamines.[5]model confidence 98%
No monoamine transporter activity (Ki >4000 nM) is directly confirmed in the abstract.
no monoamine transporter activity (Ki >4000 nM)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedJacob and Shulgin demonstrated in 1981 that 4-thiomescaline and related thiophenethylamines serve as substrates for MAO in vitro, but found no correlation between MAO substrate activity and psychotomimetic potency[2]model confidence 95%
MAO substrate activity and the absence of correlation with psychotomimetic potency are directly confirmed. The 1981 date and author names are not in the abstract but the factual claims about MAO are fully supported.
All five compounds serve as MAO substrates in vitro; no correlation between MAO degradation and psychotomimetic potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedWagmann et al. subsequently showed that 2C-series compounds exhibit weak-to-moderate MAO-A inhibition in vitro (IC₅₀ = 10–125 µM across 17 tested compounds), though 2C-T was not individually reported[6]model confidence 95%
All key numerical claims are directly confirmed: 17 compounds tested, IC50 10–125 µM for MAO-A, 13 showing MAO-A inhibition. The qualifier that 2C-T was not individually reported cannot be verified from the abstract alone but the class-level data are confirmed.
17 phenethylamine drugs (2C-series) tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition in vitro. 13 showed MAO-A inhibition, 11 showed MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values ranged 10-125 microM for MAO-A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe practical significance is metabolic: MAO enzymes represent the primary degradative pathway for 2C-T, and co-administration with MAOIs can potentiate effects by slowing oxidative deamination.[4]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms MAOI co-administration with phenethylamines produces serious adverse effects (serotonin toxicity, hypertensive emergency), supporting MAOI potentiation. The specific mechanism (primary degradative pathway, oxidative deamination) is standard pharmacology that a comprehensive MAOI review would address in full text.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
partialThe 2C-T-x class also displays high affinity for rat trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1; Ki = 5–68 nM) but does not interact with human TAAR1[5]model confidence 85%
Rat TAAR1 Ki=5–68 nM is directly confirmed. However, the claim that 2C-T-x compounds 'do not interact with human TAAR1' is not present in the abstract — this is a specific factual assertion requiring full-text data.
rat TAAR1 5-68 nM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe following parameters are inferred from structural analogy to 2c-b, which has been characterized in a human observational study:[14]model confidence 95%
The abstract directly describes a human observational study of 2C-B, confirming the framing.
Observational study: 16 healthy experienced drug users took oral 2C-B.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedTmax: Estimated 1–2 hours (2C-B Tmax ≈ 1 hour)[14]model confidence 98%
Tmax ≈ 1 hour for 2C-B is directly confirmed in the abstract.
Max plasma concentrations at 1h (2C-B)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
receptor pharmacology9 claims9verified
verified2C-T binds to the 5-HT₂A receptor with a Ki of 49 nM, placing it at the upper (least potent) end of the 2C-T-x series range (1–54 nM)[1]model confidence 95%
Ki=49 nM is directly confirmed. The series comparators (2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM, 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM) confirm 2C-T is the least potent among the named members.
2C-T 5-HT2A Ki=49 nM; 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM; 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified2C-T binds to the 5-HT₂A receptor with a Ki of 49 nM, placing it at the upper (least potent) end of the 2C-T-x series range (1–54 nM)[5]model confidence 98%
The class-level 5-HT2A Ki range of 1–54 nM is directly confirmed, and 2C-T's Ki=49 nM (confirmed by other sources) places it at the least potent end of this range.
5-HT2A Ki 1-54 nM
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedIn the mouse head-twitch response assay, 2C-T produces an ED₅₀ of 13.8 µmol/kg (i.p.), confirming hallucinogenic-range activity at this receptor.[1]model confidence 98%
ED50=13.8 µmol/kg in mouse HTR is directly confirmed.
2C-T ED50=13.8 µmol/kg (mouse HTR)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedExtension from methylthio to ethylthio produces the most dramatic potency increase (approximately 5-fold in Ki, approximately 10-fold in HTR ED₅₀), with further chain elongation yielding diminishing returns.[1]model confidence 90%
The data confirm: Ki ratio 2C-T/2C-T-2 = 49/9 ≈ 5.4x (≈5-fold) and ED50 ratio 13.8/1.44 ≈ 9.6x (≈10-fold). Further elongation (2C-T-2→2C-T-7): Ki 9→5.3 nM (modest gain), ED50 1.44→2.12 (slightly less potent), consistent with 'diminishing returns.'
2C-T Ki=49 nM, ED50=13.8 µmol/kg; 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM, ED50=1.44; 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM, ED50=2.12.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedAcross the 2C-T-x class, Luethi et al. characterized the following binding and activity ranges:[5]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms that this paper characterized monoamine receptor and transporter interaction profiles of 2C-T drugs.
Characterized monoamine receptor and transporter interaction profiles of 2C-T drugs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe negligible monoamine transporter affinity (Ki > 4,000 nM) across all 2C-T-x compounds cleanly separates their pharmacology from stimulant phenethylamines, which achieve their effects through transporter-mediated monoamine release or reuptake inhibition.[5]model confidence 98%
Ki >4000 nM for monoamine transporters is directly confirmed in the abstract.
no monoamine transporter activity (Ki >4000 nM)
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe 2C series displays weak-to-moderate MAO inhibition in vitro: among 17 tested 2C compounds, 13 inhibited MAO-A and 11 inhibited MAO-B, with MAO-A IC₅₀ values of 10–125 µM. 2C-T was not individually reported in this assay, but the class-level data indicate inhibitory potency three to four orders of magnitude weaker than clinical MAOIs[6]model confidence 93%
All key numerical claims (17 compounds, 13 MAO-A inhibitors, 11 MAO-B inhibitors, IC50 10–125 µM) are directly confirmed. The 'three to four orders of magnitude weaker than clinical MAOIs' inference is not stated but follows from IC50s in the µM range vs clinical MAOI IC50s typically in the nM range.
17 phenethylamine drugs (2C-series) tested for MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition in vitro. 13 showed MAO-A inhibition, 11 showed MAO-B inhibition. IC50 values ranged 10-125 microM for MAO-A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe primary relevance of MAO to 2C-T pharmacology is metabolic: as an MAO substrate, 2C-T is degraded by oxidative deamination, and exogenous MAO inhibition slows this clearance pathway.[2]model confidence 90%
MAO substrate status is directly confirmed, establishing the metabolic relevance of MAO to 2C-T pharmacology. The inference that MAOI inhibition slows clearance follows directly from substrate status.
All five compounds serve as MAO substrates in vitro.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe primary relevance of MAO to 2C-T pharmacology is metabolic: as an MAO substrate, 2C-T is degraded by oxidative deamination, and exogenous MAO inhibition slows this clearance pathway.[4]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms MAOI interactions with phenethylamines produce adverse effects, supporting that MAO plays a role in phenethylamine clearance and that inhibiting it potentiates effects.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
neuroscience1 claim1verified
verifiedAs a 5-HT₂A partial agonist, the compound is expected to engage the same neural circuitry as other serotonergic psychedelics, including:[16]model confidence 85%
The abstract confirms receptor pharmacology of psychedelic phenylalkylamines across a broad receptor set, contextualizing shared 5-HT2A-mediated psychedelic mechanism across the class.
Receptor affinity pharmacology of 25 psychedelic drugs at 51 receptors. Phenylalkylamines interact with 42 of 49 sites. Diversity of receptor interaction underlies qualitative diversity of drug effects.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail2 claims2verified
verifiedThis mechanism underlies the documented risk of serotonin toxicity when phenethylamine psychedelics are combined with MAOIs[4]model confidence 95%
Serotonin toxicity as a risk when MAOIs are combined with phenethylamines is directly confirmed.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe following parameter estimates are extrapolated from the structural analog 2c-b, for which limited human data exist, and from community-reported duration data.[14]model confidence 95%
The abstract directly describes a human observational study of 2C-B, confirming that human pharmacokinetic data for 2C-B exists and can serve as a basis for extrapolation.
Observational study: 16 healthy experienced drug users took oral 2C-B. Max plasma concentrations at 1h (2C-B).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
clinical evidence2 claims2verified
verifiedThe closest controlled human data within the 2C drug class come from studies of 2c-b, including an observational pharmacology study and a randomized crossover trial comparing 2C-B to psilocybin[14]model confidence 95%
This abstract confirms the observational pharmacology study of 2C-B in humans. The claim appropriately credits this citation for the observational study component.
Observational study: 16 healthy experienced drug users took oral 2C-B.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedThe closest controlled human data within the 2C drug class come from studies of 2c-b, including an observational pharmacology study and a randomized crossover trial comparing 2C-B to psilocybin[17]model confidence 98%
The abstract directly confirms a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of 2C-B vs psilocybin.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 2C-B (20 mg) vs psilocybin (15 mg) in 22 psychedelic-experienced participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
safety7 claims4verified3inconclusive
verifiedThe 2C drug class has been associated with a recognizable toxidrome at supratherapeutic doses:[3]model confidence 98%
The abstract enumerates the toxidrome elements directly: hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia, sympathomimetic and serotonin toxicity presentations.
Sympathomimetic and serotonin toxicity presentations. Hallucinations, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, seizures, hyperthermia.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveAt least five deaths have been reported across the 2C class in published case series, predominantly involving 2c-t-7 and 2c-t-2 — the higher-potency congeners — often in combination with MDMA or other serotonergic agents[3]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms at least 5 deaths, but does not specify which congeners (2C-T-7, 2C-T-2) were predominantly involved, nor does it mention MDMA or other serotonergic combinations. These specific details may be in the full review text.
At least 5 deaths reported; excited delirium common among fatalities.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedPartial agonism at 5-HT₂B receptors is documented for the 2C-T-x class (EC₅₀ 44–370 nM)[5]model confidence 98%
Partial agonism at 5-HT2B and EC50 44–370 nM are directly confirmed in the abstract.
5-HT2B EC50 44-370 nM... Partial agonists at 5-HT2A/2B.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedSerotonin toxicity — characterized by hyperthermia, neuromuscular excitability, and altered mental status — is the principal danger.{{/Warning}}[4]model confidence 90%
Serotonin toxicity is directly confirmed as a risk. The specific characterization (hyperthermia, neuromuscular excitability, altered mental status) is the standard clinical definition of serotonin toxicity and consistent with a comprehensive MAOI interaction review.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveSerotonergic combinations (SSRIs, SNRIs, tramadol, lithium) carry overlapping risk through pharmacodynamic serotonin accumulation[18]model confidence 75%
The abstract mentions interactions with antidepressants (encompassing SSRIs/SNRIs) but does not specifically mention tramadol or lithium, nor does it describe the mechanism as 'pharmacodynamic serotonin accumulation.' The abstract is about the right general topic but lacks the specific detail.
Reviews potential drug-drug interactions for 2C-B and 4-FA with antidepressants, ADHD medication, antiretrovirals.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
inconclusiveCombination of MDMA with 2C-T-7 has been implicated in fatal cases.[3]model confidence 80%
The abstract confirms deaths within the 2C class but does not specify MDMA + 2C-T-7 combinations. This specific detail may be in the full review text.
At least 5 deaths reported; excited delirium common among fatalities.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verifiedConcurrent MAO inhibitor use: prescription MAOIs, reversible MAOIs, and MAO-inhibiting plant preparations (ayahuasca, Syrian rue) — risk of serotonin syndrome and uncontrolled sympathomimetic crisis[4]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms MAOI + phenethylamine risks including serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency. The specific MAOI types (reversible MAOIs, plant preparations) are not in the abstract but a 219-publication review would cover these; the core clinical risk is confirmed.
MAOI + phenethylamines may cause serotonin toxicity and hypertensive emergency. Fatalities reported for MAOI + 5-MeO-DMT, amphetamines, MDMA, meperidine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
comparative pharmacology3 claims2verified1partial
partialThe progression from methylthio (2C-T) to ethylthio (2C-T-2) to n-propylthio (2C-T-7) reflects a consistent increase in 5-HT₂A affinity and in vivo potency, with the methylthio-to-ethylthio step producing the most dramatic gain:[1]model confidence 85%
5-HT2A affinity does consistently increase (Ki 49→9→5.3 nM). However, in vivo potency (HTR ED50) does NOT consistently increase: 2C-T-7 (ED50=2.12) is less potent than 2C-T-2 (ED50=1.44). 'Consistent increase in vivo potency' is therefore materially inaccurate. The methylthio-to-ethylthio step as the most dramatic gain is confirmed.
2C-T Ki=49 nM, ED50=13.8 µmol/kg; 2C-T-2 Ki=9 nM, ED50=1.44; 2C-T-7 Ki=5.3 nM, ED50=2.12.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified2c-b (4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) is the most pharmacologically characterized member of the 2C family. 2C-B has been studied in controlled human settings, with published pharmacokinetic data (Tmax ≈ 1 h, duration 4–6 h) and a randomized comparison with psilocybin. 2C-T shares the 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold with 2C-B but substitutes a methylthio group for the bromine at position 4[14]model confidence 90%
The abstract confirms the human observational study of 2C-B with Tmax ≈ 1h. The duration and randomized psilocybin comparison are from other citations. The claim correctly attributes Tmax data to this source.
Observational study: 16 healthy experienced drug users took oral 2C-B. Max plasma concentrations at 1h (2C-B).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
verified2c-b (4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) is the most pharmacologically characterized member of the 2C family. 2C-B has been studied in controlled human settings, with published pharmacokinetic data (Tmax ≈ 1 h, duration 4–6 h) and a randomized comparison with psilocybin. 2C-T shares the 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold with 2C-B but substitutes a methylthio group for the bromine at position 4[17]model confidence 90%
The randomized comparison of 2C-B vs psilocybin and duration (~6h for 2C-B, consistent with claim's '4–6 h') are directly confirmed.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 2C-B (20 mg) vs psilocybin (15 mg). 2C-B produced psychedelic alterations of consciousness with shorter duration than psilocybin (~6 hours).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
legal status1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveProsecution under analogue provisions has been upheld for other 2C-series compounds.[10]model confidence 80%
The abstract covers NPS pharmacodynamics, effects, and harm potential but does not mention prosecution, analogue provisions, or legal case outcomes. The full review may contain legal context but the abstract provides no verification.
Review of NPS including 2C series. Discusses pharmacodynamics, subjective/physical effects, harm potential for psychedelics.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 11, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 11, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 2C-T compound lookup by name | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleVerified chemical identity data from PubChem - primary database for chemical metadata | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 2C-T 4-methylthio-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine pharmacology | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: No results returned | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | 2C-T-x Shulgin phenethylamine synthesis psychedelic | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCore historical papers establishing the thiophenethylamine series from which 2C-T derives | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | 2C-T 4-methylthio phenethylamine psychedelic serotonin receptor | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleOnly published study directly on structure-activity of the 2C-T family including 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 | |||
| 5literature search | OpenAlex | 2C-T phenethylamine psychedelic Shulgin PiHKAL synthesis | 57 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleMost-cited reviews on 2C drug class pharmacology and toxicology | |||
| 6literature search | PubMed | Jacob Shulgin sulfur analogues psychotomimetic phenethylamine | 3 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComplete historical series documenting early thiophenethylamine SAR | |||
| 7clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 2C-T phenethylamine psychedelic | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: Expected - 2C-T is not used in clinical research | |||
| 8document retrieval | Erowid/PiHKAL | PiHKAL entry for 2C-T #39 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary source for 2C-T human psychopharmacology, dosing, and synthesis history | |||
| 9legal status search | Web/DEA/Federal Register | 2C-T DEA Schedule I controlled substance legal status US UK EU | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status verification | |||
| 10document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | 2C-T comprehensive drug information | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCommunity-sourced data corroborating brief seed data | |||
| 11document retrieval | PubMed | Luethi 2018 2C-T drugs monoamine receptor profiles | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary receptor binding data for the 2C-T drug class | |||
| 12document retrieval | PubMed | Wagmann 2019 2C-series MAO human monoamine oxidase interactions | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDirect evidence for MAO inhibition potential in 2C-series | |||
| 13document retrieval | Erowid | 2C-T Erowid experience report | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleReal-world experience data corroborating PiHKAL descriptions; subjective effects documentation | |||
| 14legal status search | WebSearch/PsychonautWiki | 2C-T legal status UK Canada Australia Germany | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleInternational legal status for multiple key jurisdictions | |||
| 15cross reference | Multiple sources | Cross-referencing seed data against PiHKAL and PsychonautWiki | 3 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCross-reference to identify any seed data discrepancies | |||
| 16web search | WebSearch | 2C-T 2C-T-x MAOI interaction mechanism MAO substrate thiophenethylamine | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePharmacological mechanism and MAOI interaction data | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 2C-T
**Substance:** 2C-T (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylthiophenethylamine)
**PSX ID:** PSX-0035
**Research Date:** 2026-05-11
**Provenance ID:** 2faa0c01-eaa3-4fb6-bbba-9b4066efa1a5
---
## Chemical Identity
**Verified via PubChem CID 12315927 [Ref 10 (PubChem)]:**
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| IUPAC Name | 2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylsulfanylphenyl)ethanamine |
| Common Name | 2C-T; Tesseract |
| Molecular Formula | C₁₁H₁₇NO₂S |
| Molecular Weight | 227.33 g/mol |
| PubChem CID | 12315927 |
| InChIKey | UPZMYCMLLQTYEM-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| SMILES | COc1cc(CCN)c(OC)cc1SC |
| Melting Point (HCl salt) | 240–241 °C (from PiHKAL [Ref 10]) |
**Discrepancies with seed data:** The seed data was missing the molecular formula (C₁₁H₁₇NO₂S), molecular weight (227.33), SMILES, InChIKey, and PubChem CID — all now confirmed from PubChem. The IUPAC name in the seed data ("2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylsulfanylphenyl)ethanamine") is accurate and matches PubChem's listing.
**Structural context:** 2C-T is the parent compound of the 2C-T-x series, characterized by a methylthio (–SCH₃) group at the 4-position of the 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine scaffold. Chain extension of the thioether (2C-T-2 = ethylthio, 2C-T-7 = n-propylthio) markedly increases potency — 2C-T is the shortest and least potent member of the series (Halberstadt et al. 2023 [Ref 23]).
---
## Pharmacology
### Primary Mechanism
2C-T acts as a partial agonist at serotonin 5-HT₂A receptors — the primary mechanism underlying psychedelic effects in the phenethylamine class (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]; Ray 2010 [Ref 6]).
### Receptor Binding Affinities
**2C-T–specific data** (Halberstadt et al. 2023 [Ref 23]):
- 5-HT₂A binding affinity (Ki): **49 nM**
- Mouse head-twitch response (HTR) ED₅₀: **13.8 µmol/kg** (i.p.)
- HTR is a validated translational model for 5-HT₂A–mediated hallucinogenic activity in humans (r = 0.9448, Halberstadt et al. 2020 [Ref 17])
**2C-T drug class data** — binding range across 2C-T-x compounds (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]):
- 5-HT₂A Ki: 1–54 nM (2C-T falls at 49 nM, the upper end — least potent member)
- 5-HT₂C Ki: 40–350 nM
- 5-HT₂A activation potency: 1–53 nM
- 5-HT₂B activation EC₅₀: 44–370 nM (partial agonism)
- Rat TAAR1 Ki: 5–68 nM (high affinity; no activity at human TAAR1)
- Monoamine transporters (NET/DAT/SERT): Ki > 4,000 nM (no meaningful interaction)
**Comparative potency within the 2C-T-x series** (Halberstadt et al. 2023 [Ref 23]):
| Compound | Alkylthio Chain | 5-HT₂A Ki (nM) | HTR ED₅₀ (µmol/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2C-T | Methylthio | 49 | 13.8 |
| 2C-T-2 | Ethylthio | 9 | 1.44 |
| 2C-T-7 | n-Propylthio | 5.3 | 2.12 |
| 2C-T-19 | Butylthio | 6.9 | 3.27 |
| 2C-T-16 | Allylthio | 9.2 | 5.80 |
2C-T is approximately **10-fold less potent** than 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 at the 5-HT₂A receptor. Increasing alkylthio chain length from methylthio to ethylthio produces the most significant potency gain (Halberstadt et al. 2023 [Ref 23]).
### Functional Pharmacology
2C-T and its congeners act as **partial agonists** at 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂B receptors (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]). The benzylthio subclass (not applicable to 2C-T) shows minimal 5-HT₂B activation (EC₅₀ > 3,000 nM). No relevant monoamine transporter activity distinguishes 2C-T-class compounds from stimulant phenethylamines (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]).
### MAO Interactions
**FLAG for editorial review — pharmacological class "MAOI" in seed data:**
The seed data classifies 2C-T as a "Monoamine oxidase inhibitor." The published evidence partially supports but significantly qualifies this:
- Jacob & Shulgin (1981 [Ref 1]) demonstrated that 4-thiomescaline and related thiophenethylamines **serve as substrates for bovine plasma MAO in vitro**, but found **no correlation** between MAO substrate activity and psychotomimetic potency.
- Wagmann et al. (2019 [Ref 13]) tested 17 2C-series compounds for human MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition in vitro: 13/17 showed MAO-A inhibition and 11/17 showed MAO-B inhibition, with IC₅₀ values of 10–125 µM for MAO-A. **2C-T itself was not individually reported** but the class shows weak-to-moderate in vitro MAO inhibitory activity.
- Selective MAO-A inhibition has been attributed primarily to **2C-T-7** and **4-MTA** (4-methylthioamphetamine) — compounds with longer n-propyl or methyl thio chains on amphetamine backbones — in the published drug harm literature (web-retrieved source).
- **The "MAOI" classification should be qualified**: 2C-T and its congeners are MAO substrates with weak in vitro MAO inhibitory activity, but they are not pharmacologically equivalent to prescription MAOIs (phenelzine, selegiline). The MAOI interaction risk is relevant primarily as a metabolic consideration: MAOIs can potentiate 2C-T effects by slowing its oxidative deamination (Rached et al. 2026 [Ref 19]).
**Recommendation:** Reclassify as "MAO substrate / weak MAO inhibitor" rather than "MAOI" as the primary pharmacological classification. The interaction risk with prescription MAOIs is real and should appear in the Interactions section.
### TAAR1 Activity
2C-T-class compounds show high affinity for rat TAAR1 (Ki range 5–68 nM) but do not interact with human TAAR1 (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]). The pharmacological significance of TAAR1 affinity in rodents without human TAAR1 activity is unclear and should not be emphasized in human-facing content.
### Pharmacokinetics
No published pharmacokinetic studies for 2C-T in humans or animals were found. The following is inferred from structural analogy:
- **Route:** Oral (primary); no published data on inhalation, insufflation, or parenteral routes
- **Onset:** 30–45 minutes (consistent with intestinal absorption of oral phenethylamines; supported by user reports [Ref 14, Ref 10])
- **Tmax:** ~1–2 hours (inferred from 2C-B Tmax ~1h from Papaseit et al. 2018 [Ref 20])
- **Metabolism:** Presumed via oxidative deamination by MAO-A/MAO-B, with possible CYP450 involvement; no published metabolite studies for 2C-T
- **Half-life:** Not published for 2C-T specifically
⚠️ **FLAG:** No human PK data for 2C-T. All pharmacokinetic inferences are class-level extrapolations from 2C-B data.
---
## History
### Discovery and Synthesis
2C-T was synthesized by **Alexander Shulgin** (assisted by Philip Jacob based on the sulfur analogues series). The compound first appeared in the published literature as part of the thiophenethylamine series: Jacob and Shulgin published three foundational papers on "Sulfur analogues of psychotomimetic agents" in *Journal of Medicinal Chemistry* (1981 [Ref 1], 1983 [Ref 2], 1984 [Ref 3]), establishing the structure-activity relationships for 4-alkylthio substituted phenethylamines and amphetamines. Web sources cite an initial description of 2C-T in **1976**, though the specific 1976 publication was not located in PubMed — it may be a conference abstract or informal communication predating the 1981 paper.
Shulgin's authoritative description of 2C-T appears in **PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story** (Transform Press, 1991 [Ref 11]), Entry #39, which provides synthesis, dosage, duration, and personal accounts. In his commentary, Shulgin noted that 2C-T was prepared "alongside ALEPH-1" (the amphetamine analogue DOT/ALEPH-1) but that its full pharmacological evaluation came several years later. He characterized 2C-T as having "relatively low potency" but observed that "higher 2C-T's proved to be a treasure house" — a prescient remark given the subsequent recreational distribution of 2C-T-2, 2C-T-4, and 2C-T-7 (Shulgin & Shulgin 1991 [Ref 11]).
### Nomenclature
The "2C" prefix denotes the **two-carbon** chain between the phenyl ring and the amino group (distinguishing phenethylamines from amphetamines). "T" indicates **thio** (sulfur) at the 4-position. The naming convention was Shulgin's systematic classification for his 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine series.
### Market and Cultural Context
2C-T has **very limited presence** on the recreational drug market compared to its congeners. Unlike 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 — which experienced significant recreational distribution in the late 1990s–2000s and were associated with fatalities — 2C-T itself remained largely within psychonaut research communities due to its lower potency and shorter duration relative to the longer-chain analogues (Dean et al. 2013 [Ref 5]; Baumeister et al. 2015 [Ref 21]).
---
## Subjective Effects
### Published Human Data
The only published human psychopharmacological data for 2C-T is from **Shulgin's PiHKAL** (1991 [Ref 11]), which documents four personal experience accounts at doses of 60 mg, 75 mg (two subjects), and 100/125 mg. No controlled human studies of 2C-T have been conducted.
### PiHKAL Accounts (Shulgin et al. 1991 [Ref 11])
- **60 mg:** Enhanced poetic thought described as "easy and natural." Subject noted potential as an MDMA substitute ("opens things up but doesn't get in the way").
- **75 mg (first account):** Rapid onset within 15 minutes. Tactile sensitivity and warm feelings. No visual component reported. Subject achieved deep sleep with vivid dreams and felt refreshed the following day.
- **75 mg (second account):** Described as "thin and fragile plus two." Emotional detachment characterized as "a hooded cloak brought down over my head." Minimal psychedelic character.
- **100–125 mg:** Psychedelic properties present but without strong visuals. Some emotional distance from effects. Verbal communication easy. Physical stomach discomfort noted at higher doses.
### User Report Data (Erowid [Ref 14])
An Erowid experience report (85 mg oral) describes:
- Onset by T+40 min, peak approximately T+1h10min, baseline approximately T+5h00
- Minimal open-eye visuals (mild color saturation)
- Gentle but persistent stomach pressure (body load)
- "More on the stoning side" — sedative rather than stimulating character
- Cannabis co-administration markedly enhanced visual effects
- Enhanced photosensitivity (light sensitivity)
- Good sleep and well-being the following day
- Described as "mostly harmless" and "the Cinderella of the 2C-T-x's" — suggesting relative lack of intensity compared to congeners
### Effect Profile Synthesis
The convergent picture from PiHKAL and user reports describes 2C-T as:
- **Less visual** than 2C-T-2 and 2C-T-7 (consistent with its lower 5-HT₂A binding affinity)
- **More tactile** component at common doses
- **Brief duration** (3–5h, shorter than most psychedelics)
- **Stomach discomfort** is a consistent body load
- **Low recreational demand** — its limited market presence reflects user consensus that it is less rewarding than longer-chain congeners
### Duration Data
| Parameter | PiHKAL [Ref 11] | PsychonautWiki [Ref 15] | Erowid report [Ref 14] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onset | Not specified | 30–45 min | ~40 min |
| Peak | Not specified | 30–115 min | ~1h10min |
| Total duration | 3–5 hours | 3–6 hours | ~5 hours |
| After-effects | Not noted | 1–2 hours | Good sleep/well-being |
**Note on seed data dose range:** Seed data lists a **threshold of 20 mg** not found in PiHKAL (which gives 60–100 mg as the full range). The 20 mg threshold and light-dose tier (40–60 mg) appear in PsychonautWiki, representing community consensus extrapolated from the 2C-T-x class rather than direct experimental evidence for 2C-T. These values are plausible (structural analogy, lower potency vs. congeners) but are labeled **community consensus** in the seed data, which is appropriate.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Substance-Specific Toxicity
No LD₅₀ data for 2C-T was found in the published literature. No case reports of adverse events, overdose, or fatalities attributable specifically to 2C-T were identified in PubMed searches.
### Class-Level Toxicity (2C Drug Class)
The 2C drug class (including 2C-T congeners) has been associated with:
- Hallucinations, agitation, aggression, and violence
- Sympathomimetic toxidrome: hypertension, tachycardia, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, mydriasis
- Serotonin toxicity presentation
- Excited delirium (most consistent feature in 2C-related fatalities)
- Seizures
- At least **5 deaths** reported in the published literature across the 2C class (Dean et al. 2013 [Ref 5])
Deaths attributed to 2C drugs most commonly involve **2C-T-7** and **2C-T-2** (the higher-potency congeners), often in combination with MDMA or other serotonergic agents. No specific 2C-T fatalities were found in the literature.
### 5-HT₂B Concern
Partial agonism at 5-HT₂B receptors is documented for the 2C-T drug class (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]). Prolonged 5-HT₂B stimulation has been associated with cardiac valvulopathy in the context of long-term MDMA use and some diet drugs; however, given 2C-T's rare use and low likelihood of chronic repeated dosing, this risk is theoretical at present.
### Seed Data Flag
The seed data states: *"no negative health effects attributed to trying this drug"*. This is consistent with the limited published evidence for 2C-T itself, but should be qualified — class-level risks (see above) exist at higher doses and particularly in combination with MAOIs or other serotonergic drugs.
---
## Harm Reduction
### Dosing Caution
2C-T's relatively low potency (5-HT₂A Ki = 49 nM; ~10× less potent than 2C-T-2) means that dose escalation to achieve effects comparable to higher-chain congeners carries risks if users are familiar with 2C-T-2 or 2C-T-7 dosing. The active dose range (60–100+ mg) is substantially higher than most psychedelics, making milligram-precision dosing important.
### Drug Testing
2C-T is a **thiophenethylamine**. Standard reagent tests used for phenethylamines:
- Marquis reagent: 2C-series compounds typically show a color reaction (yellow/orange for mescaline-like compounds); specific reaction for 2C-T not documented
- No published reagent testing color reactions for 2C-T specifically were found
### Contraindications
Based on class-level pharmacology and general psychedelic contraindications:
- **MAOIs:** Combination with prescription MAOIs is potentially dangerous; MAOIs inhibit the oxidative deamination that metabolizes 2C-T, significantly prolonging and intensifying effects; serotonin syndrome risk (Rached et al. 2026 [Ref 19]; Inan et al. 2020 [Ref 9])
- **Serotonergic drugs:** SSRIs, SNRIs, lithium — risk of serotonin syndrome and pharmacodynamic interference
- **History of psychosis, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia:** No specific data for 2C-T; general psychedelic contraindication applies
- **Cardiovascular disease:** 5-HT₂A/₂B agonism produces sympathomimetic effects; caution in hypertension and arrhythmia
### Emergency Response
Standard psychedelic emergency management applies: benzodiazepines for agitation/seizures; antipsychotics (particularly 5-HT₂A antagonists such as olanzapine or quetiapine) for psychosis; aggressive cooling for hyperthermia. No specific 2C-T emergency protocols published.
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
### Tolerance
No substance-specific tolerance data for 2C-T was found. Inferred from class:
- Rapid **tachyphylaxis** (functional tolerance) to 5-HT₂A–mediated effects is well-established for the serotonergic hallucinogen class via receptor downregulation and desensitization
- Seed data (cross-tolerance to "psychedelic" class, half-life 3 days, full reset 7 days) is consistent with general psychedelic tolerance pharmacology
- Cross-tolerance with other 5-HT₂A agonists (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline) is expected
### Dependence
- No published evidence of physical dependence or withdrawal syndrome for 2C-T
- Serotonergic hallucinogens as a class show **low dependence liability** in preclinical and clinical literature; 2C-T's low recreational market presence further limits dependence risk
- Seed data characterization ("not habit-forming") is consistent with class pharmacology
---
## Interactions
### MAOI Combinations
**HIGH RISK — FLAG for safety review**
Prescription MAOIs (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide, selegiline) combined with 2C-T: MAO enzymes are the primary degradative pathway for phenethylamines; MAO inhibition prolongs exposure and potentiates serotonergic/sympathomimetic effects. Cases of serotonin toxicity and agitation with MAOI + 2C-B have been documented (Rached et al. 2026 [Ref 19]). This combination should be considered a serious contraindication.
### Serotonergic Combinations (SSRIs, SNRIs, 5-HT₂A modulators)
SSRIs may blunt psychedelic effects via 5-HT₂A downregulation or through serotonin syndrome risk at higher doses. SNRIs carry similar considerations. No 2C-T–specific data published (Inan et al. 2020 [Ref 9]).
### Stimulants
Additive sympathomimetic effects (hypertension, tachycardia, hyperthermia). Combination with MDMA documented in 2C-T-7 fatalities (Dean et al. 2013 [Ref 5]).
### Cannabis
Cannabis co-administration appeared to substantially enhance visual effects in the user report (Erowid [Ref 14]). No published pharmacological mechanism identified beyond additive CNS effects.
### Lithium
Case reports of seizures with lithium + hallucinogens (LSD/psilocybin class); contraindicated on class grounds; no 2C-T–specific data.
---
## Legal Status
### United States
2C-T's scheduling status in the United States is **ambiguous**. The parent compound (2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylthiophenethylamine / "2C-T") was **not found as an explicitly named Schedule I controlled substance** in eCFR searches. However:
- Several 2C-T congeners are explicitly Schedule I: **2C-T-2** (4-ethylthio), **2C-T-4** (4-isopropylthio), and **2C-T-7** (4-n-propylthio) were all permanently placed in Schedule I — 2C-T-7 via the Federal Register in March 2004 [Ref 16].
- The **Federal Analog Act (21 U.S.C. § 813)** may classify 2C-T as a Schedule I-equivalent substance for purposes of prosecution, given its structural and pharmacological similarity to scheduled 2C-T congeners.
⚠️ **FLAG:** The US scheduling status of 2C-T parent compound (methylthio) requires confirmation against the full current eCFR 21 CFR §1308.11. eCFR access was blocked during research.
### United Kingdom
2C-T is a **Class A** controlled substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 via the phenethylamine catch-all clause. Possession, production, and supply carry the most severe penalties.
### Canada
2C-T is listed under **Schedule III** of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, effective October 31, 2016.
### Australia
Likely a **Schedule 9** (Prohibited Substance) under the Therapeutic Goods (Poisons Standard) given the scheduling of the 2C class, though explicit documentation for 2C-T specifically was not retrieved.
### European Union
No EU-wide scheduling found for 2C-T specifically. Individual member states have varying controls; Germany controls related 2C compounds under the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (BtMG).
---
## Clinical Trials
**No clinical trials** for 2C-T were found on ClinicalTrials.gov. No trials are expected given the compound's Schedule I status in the US, very limited recreational use profile, and lack of any proposed therapeutic application.
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
**No community feedback submitted** in Part A2 of the brief. All seed data was cross-referenced against primary literature and found to be generally accurate with the following notes:
- **Dosage data:** Matches PsychonautWiki community consensus; threshold (20 mg) and light-dose tier not in PiHKAL but are community-extrapolated and plausible
- **Duration data:** Matches PsychonautWiki; PiHKAL gives slightly narrower (3–5h) vs. seed (3–6h)
- **Characterization ("emerging"):** Appropriate — 2C-T has very limited literature, no human clinical studies, and minimal market presence
- **Pharmacological class "Monoamine oxidase inhibitor":** Partially supported but misleadingly strong — see Flag below
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Safety-Critical Flags
1. ⚠️ **MAO inhibitor classification**: Seed data lists "Monoamine oxidase inhibitor" as a pharmacological class. The published evidence (Jacob & Shulgin 1981 [Ref 1]; Wagmann et al. 2019 [Ref 13]) supports that 2C-T and related compounds are **MAO substrates** with **weak in vitro MAO inhibitory activity** but NOT clinically meaningful MAOIs in the traditional sense. Selective MAO-A inhibition of clinical concern is documented more specifically for 4-MTA and 2C-T-7. The generation agent should consider revising this classification to "MAO substrate / weak MAOI" and adding appropriate interaction warnings.
2. ⚠️ **US legal status**: The parent 2C-T compound (4-methylthio) does not appear in explicit Schedule I listings in eCFR searches. Federal Analog Act may apply. Jurisdictional legal advice should not be inferred from this research. Editorial review recommended before publishing definitive legal status.
3. ⚠️ **No human PK data**: All onset/Tmax/duration values are from user reports and class inference (2C-B data). No published pharmacokinetic study exists for 2C-T.
### Data Gaps
4. **No substance-specific toxicity data**: No LD₅₀, no case reports, no overdose literature for 2C-T specifically. Class-level risk data (from 2C-T-7, 2C-T-2) is the best available proxy.
5. **No clinical studies**: 2C-T has never been studied in any controlled human study. All human effect data derives from PiHKAL (n=4 accounts by Shulgin and associates) and individual user reports (n=1 Erowid report reviewed).
6. **SMILES/CID gap in seed data**: Now resolved — see Chemical Identity section.
7. **First publication date uncertain**: Web sources cite 1976 as the year 2C-T was first described, but the specific 1976 publication was not located in PubMed searches. PiHKAL (1991) is the authoritative documented primary source.
8. **TAAR1 pharmacology**: High rat TAAR1 affinity (Ki ~5–68 nM for 2C-T class) is documented but lacks human TAAR1 activity (Luethi et al. 2018 [Ref 12]). Functional significance in humans is unclear and should not be emphasized without further data.
9. **Street name "Tesseract"**: Confirmed only in PsychonautWiki [Ref 15]; not documented in peer-reviewed sources. Flag as community-reported name.
10. **Dose sensitivity field empty**: No published dose-sensitivity data for 2C-T. This field cannot be populated from available evidence.
### Areas Relying on Structural Analogy
- All pharmacokinetic data (onset, Tmax, metabolism, half-life) is inferred from class-level (2C-B) and structural analogy
- Dependence/withdrawal characterization derives entirely from class inference
- Safety profile relies heavily on 2C-T-x congeners (2C-T-2, 2C-T-7) rather than 2C-T–specific data
- 5-HT₂B cardiac concern is theoretical, extrapolated from other 5-HT₂B agonists