2-FEA
N-ethyl-2-fluoroamphetamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
insufflatedtrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 15 mg | 15 mg | low |
| Low | 20–30 mg | 20–30 mg | low |
| Common | 30–40 mg | 30–40 mg | low |
| Strong | 40–60 mg | 40–60 mg | low |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Insufflated dose ranges carried forward from existing DB seed data, which matches PsychonautWiki community consensus exactly (threshold 15 mg, light 20–30 mg, common 30–40 mg, strong 40–60 mg, heavy 60+ mg). No controlled human dose-finding studies exist for 2-FEA. All values are community-sourced and unverified against published pharmacological data. Work-notes confirm these values and note that oral ROA data should NOT be proposed due to insufficient evidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInsufflated dose ranges carried forward from existing DB seed data, which matches PsychonautWiki community consensus exactly (threshold 15 mg, light 20–30 mg, common 30–40 mg, strong 40–60 mg, heavy 60+ mg). No controlled human dose-finding studies exist for 2-FEA. All values are community-sourced and unverified against published pharmacological data. Work-notes confirm these values and note that oral ROA data should NOT be proposed due to insufficient evidence. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Come uptrace | 5–10 minutes | 5–10 minutes | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: come up 5–10 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: come up 5–10 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 1–2.5 hours | 1–2.5 hours | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: total 1–2.5 hours insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. This is subjective experience duration only, not including aftereffects. No controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: total 1–2.5 hours insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. This is subjective experience duration only, not including aftereffects. No controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 5–15 minutes | 5–15 minutes | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: onset 5–15 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled pharmacokinetic studies for 2-FEA. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: onset 5–15 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled pharmacokinetic studies for 2-FEA. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: peak 30–60 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: peak 30–60 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Offsettrace | 30–60 minutes | 30–60 minutes | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: offset 30–60 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: offset 30–60 minutes insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. No controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 1–3 hours | 1–3 hours | low |
| Editorial | PsychonautWiki community consensus: aftereffects 1–3 hours insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. Includes residual wakefulness, restlessness, mild fatigue, and possible irritability. No controlled data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPsychonautWiki community consensus: aftereffects 1–3 hours insufflated. Matches existing DB seed data. Includes residual wakefulness, restlessness, mild fatigue, and possible irritability. No controlled data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | low |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, neurological | cardiovascular, neurological | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify acute: moderate, chronic: moderate, organs: cardiovascular (primary) and neurological (uncertain). All toxicity assessment is class-extrapolated from 4-FA cardiovascular toxicity and amphetamine class cardiotoxicity. Evidence discount applied: no substance-specific data exist. Cardiovascular organ designation has stronger analog support (4-FA ED presentations); neurological designation is more speculative (para-halogenation neurotoxicity may not apply to ortho position). | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify acute: moderate, chronic: moderate, organs: cardiovascular (primary) and neurological (uncertain). All toxicity assessment is class-extrapolated from 4-FA cardiovascular toxicity and amphetamine class cardiotoxicity. Evidence discount applied: no substance-specific data exist. Cardiovascular organ designation has stronger analog support (4-FA ED presentations); neurological designation is more speculative (para-halogenation neurotoxicity may not apply to ortho position). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | moderate | moderate | low |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | high | high | low |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify physical: moderate, psychological: moderate, compulsive redosing: moderate-to-high (rounded to high given short duration factor), dose escalation: moderate. All values are class-level inference from amphetamine dependence data and community consensus. 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent studies (Anchondo et al. 2025); fluorinated amphetamines elevate drug liking and wanting (Kuypers et al. 2018). No 2-FEA-specific dependence studies exist. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify physical: moderate, psychological: moderate, compulsive redosing: moderate-to-high (rounded to high given short duration factor), dose escalation: moderate. All values are class-level inference from amphetamine dependence data and community consensus. 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent studies (Anchondo et al. 2025); fluorinated amphetamines elevate drug liking and wanting (Kuypers et al. 2018). No 2-FEA-specific dependence studies exist. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | mild | mild | low |
| Symptoms | fatigue, hypersomnia, depressed mood, increased appetite, anhedonia | fatigue, hypersomnia, depressed mood, increased appetite, anhedonia | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | Withdrawal profile inferred from amphetamine class discontinuation data. Work-notes specify mild-to-moderate severity, onset hours after last dose, duration days to 1–2 weeks. Symptoms (fatigue, hypersomnia, depressed mood, increased appetite, anhedonia) are standard amphetamine withdrawal features. No 2-FEA-specific withdrawal data published. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWithdrawal profile inferred from amphetamine class discontinuation data. Work-notes specify mild-to-moderate severity, onset hours after last dose, duration days to 1–2 weeks. Symptoms (fatigue, hypersomnia, depressed mood, increased appetite, anhedonia) are standard amphetamine withdrawal features. No 2-FEA-specific withdrawal data published. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 10.5 days | 10.5 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | amphetamine, methamphetamine, 2-FA, 2-FMA, other dopamine-releasing stimulants | amphetamine, methamphetamine, 2-FA, 2-FMA, other dopamine-releasing stimulants | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify buildup: moderate, half-life: 5 days, full reset: 1.5 weeks, cross-tolerances: amphetamine, methamphetamine, 2-FA, 2-FMA, other dopamine-releasing stimulants. All values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki seed data); mechanism is class-level inference. No published tolerance studies for 2-FEA. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify buildup: moderate, half-life: 5 days, full reset: 1.5 weeks, cross-tolerances: amphetamine, methamphetamine, 2-FA, 2-FMA, other dopamine-releasing stimulants. All values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki seed data); mechanism is class-level inference. No published tolerance studies for 2-FEA. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication with strong analog support from 4-FA cardiovascular toxicity data. All fluorinated amphetamines share catecholamine release mechanism driving cardiovascular risk. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication with strong analog support from 4-FA cardiovascular toxicity data. All fluorinated amphetamines share catecholamine release mechanism driving cardiovascular risk. | |||
| other Concurrent MAOI therapytrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Well-established class interaction between MAOIs and monoamine releasing agents. Mechanism is pharmacodynamic (prevention of monoamine degradation + active release = catastrophic monoamine excess). | ||
ReasoningReasoningWell-established class interaction between MAOIs and monoamine releasing agents. Mechanism is pharmacodynamic (prevention of monoamine degradation + active release = catastrophic monoamine excess). | |||
| other Concurrent serotonergic medicationtrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level interaction; 2-FEA's possible SERT activity (predicted by N-ethyl SAR data, Fitzgerald et al. 2024) makes serotonergic combinations particularly concerning. Tramadol combination is rated lethal in seed data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level interaction; 2-FEA's possible SERT activity (predicted by N-ethyl SAR data, Fitzgerald et al. 2024) makes serotonergic combinations particularly concerning. Tramadol combination is rated lethal in seed data. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Standard amphetamine class contraindication. Seizure threshold reduction is a well-documented class effect of catecholamine-releasing stimulants. | ||
ReasoningReasoningStandard amphetamine class contraindication. Seizure threshold reduction is a well-documented class effect of catecholamine-releasing stimulants. | |||
| metabolic Hyperthyroidismtrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication based on additive sympathomimetic pharmacodynamics. No 2-FEA-specific data; inferred from amphetamine class. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication based on additive sympathomimetic pharmacodynamics. No 2-FEA-specific data; inferred from amphetamine class. | |||
| psychiatric Psychotic disorders, severe anxiety, bipolar disordertrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level contraindication. Stimulant-precipitated psychosis, panic, and mania are well-documented amphetamine class risks. Community reports confirm anxiety and paranoia at higher 2-FEA doses. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level contraindication. Stimulant-precipitated psychosis, panic, and mania are well-documented amphetamine class risks. Community reports confirm anxiety and paranoia at higher 2-FEA doses. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancy and lactationtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level absolute contraindication based on amphetamine reproductive toxicity data. No substance-specific data for 2-FEA; safety-critical flag warranted. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level absolute contraindication based on amphetamine reproductive toxicity data. No substance-specific data for 2-FEA; safety-critical flag warranted. | |||
Timeline Phases
insufflated
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 300–900 sec(i=0.15) | 300–900 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 300–600 sec(i=0.50) | 300–600 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | 1800–3600 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.35) | 1800–3600 sec(i=0.35) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.10) | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | Timeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTimeline phases derived from PsychonautWiki community consensus duration data (insufflated: onset 5–15 min, come up 5–10 min, peak 30–60 min, offset 30–60 min, aftereffects 1–3 hours). No controlled pharmacokinetic studies exist for 2-FEA. Phase descriptions incorporate substance-specific texture from article prose and community reports. Work-notes specified onset, come_up, peak, offset, and afterglow phases with intensity weights of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.15 respectively — adjusted slightly for schema consistency. Afterglow driving advisory taken from work-notes. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (~15 mg insufflated), 2-FEA produces minimal perceptible effects — a faint increase in alertness and wakefulness that confirms the substance is active. There is no significant euphoria, mood alteration, or cognitive enhancement at this level. Physical effects are subtle: a slight increase in heart rate may be noticeable, and mild appetite suppression can emerge. Most users report the experience as barely distinguishable from placebo. This tier is primarily useful for establishing individual sensitivity. Given the complete absence of controlled human safety data for 2-FEA, starting at threshold is particularly important to assess personal tolerance before escalating.
Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific context. All values are community consensus (PsychonautWiki); no controlled studies exist for 2-FEA at any dose. Reference compounds: 2-FA, amphetamine class.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes threshold summary expanded with substance-specific context. All values are community consensus (PsychonautWiki); no controlled studies exist for 2-FEA at any dose. Reference compounds: 2-FA, amphetamine class.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At light doses (20–30 mg insufflated), mild stimulation emerges — increased focus, slight mood lift, and gentle physical energy. Sociability may increase subtly. The experience is functional rather than recreational, with effects resembling a moderate dose of caffeine plus a mild mood brightener. Appetite suppression becomes noticeable. A mild increase in heart rate and slight dry mouth may occur. Some users report faint tactile warmth suggestive of serotonergic activity, though this is inconsistently described at this tier. Effects resolve within approximately 1.5–2 hours via insufflation. Sleep is generally achievable within 2–3 hours of dosing. Aftereffects are minimal at this tier.
Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community consensus dosing from PsychonautWiki; serotonergic warmth noted in Bluelight reports. No controlled data. Reference compounds: 2-FA, 2-FMA, amphetamine class.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes light tier summary expanded. Community consensus dosing from PsychonautWiki; serotonergic warmth noted in Bluelight reports. No controlled data. Reference compounds: 2-FA, 2-FMA, amphetamine class.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At common doses (30–40 mg insufflated), the core stimulant experience fully manifests. Cognitive euphoria, enhanced focus, motivation enhancement, thought acceleration, and pronounced wakefulness dominate the cognitive profile. A subtle entactogenic warmth — sociability enhancement and mild empathic quality — is reported by some users, though less pronounced than in 3-FEA. Physical stimulation is prominent: increased energy, appetite suppression, dry mouth, and increased heart rate. Bruxism may emerge. Pupil dilation is typical. Temperature dysregulation and mild vasoconstriction are possible. The total insufflated duration is 1–2.5 hours, with aftereffects lasting 1–3 hours. Compulsive redosing urge begins at this tier — the short duration makes repeated dosing tempting, but each redose adds cumulative cardiovascular strain.
Work-notes common tier summary expanded with entactogenic qualities from prose and community reports. Duration and dose from PsychonautWiki community consensus. Compulsive redosing flagged in both work-notes and article prose. Reference compounds: 2-FA, 2-FMA, 4-FA.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes common tier summary expanded with entactogenic qualities from prose and community reports. Duration and dose from PsychonautWiki community consensus. Compulsive redosing flagged in both work-notes and article prose. Reference compounds: 2-FA, 2-FMA, 4-FA.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At strong doses (40–60 mg insufflated), stimulation intensifies with pronounced cognitive euphoria and thought acceleration. Ego inflation is possible. The experience shifts from functional toward forcefully recreational, with motivation enhancement and focus becoming less directed and more diffuse. Cardiovascular effects are more prominent — tachycardia, noticeable vasoconstriction, and temperature dysregulation. Bruxism and jaw tension increase. Excessive sweating, restlessness, and anxiety emerge as dose-dependent side effects. Pupil dilation is marked. Compulsive redosing urge is significant at this tier. Insomnia is likely for several hours after effects subside. The aftereffect period may include headache, irritability, and low mood as catecholamine levels normalize. Each redose at this range substantially increases cardiovascular risk.
Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Side effect escalation profile inferred from amphetamine class and 4-FA cardiovascular data (Annawald et al. 2024; Gresnigt et al. 2022). Community reports confirm anxiety and restlessness at higher doses. No controlled data for 2-FEA.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes strong tier summary expanded. Side effect escalation profile inferred from amphetamine class and 4-FA cardiovascular data (Annawald et al. 2024; Gresnigt et al. 2022). Community reports confirm anxiety and restlessness at higher doses. No controlled data for 2-FEA.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At heavy doses (60+ mg insufflated), the risk of adverse effects escalates sharply. Cardiovascular strain becomes the primary concern — abnormal heartbeat, severe vasoconstriction, and dangerous blood pressure elevation are expected by analog inference from 4-FA and amphetamine class data. Hyperthermia risk increases, especially in warm environments or with physical exertion. Significant anxiety, paranoia, and possible delusions may emerge. Physical discomfort — restlessness, trembling, severe bruxism — can outweigh euphoria. The experience becomes dysphoric for many users at this level. Extended aftereffects are typical: headache, depression, cognitive fatigue, irritability, and anhedonia may persist for hours to days. This tier carries substantially elevated risk given that no toxic dose threshold has been established for 2-FEA. Emergency medical presentations would follow standard sympathomimetic toxidrome protocols.
Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. Adverse effect profile inferred from 4-FA ED presentations (Gresnigt et al. 2022), amphetamine overdose clinical features (Spiller et al. 2013), and class-level cardiovascular toxicity (Annawald et al. 2024). No 2-FEA-specific overdose data exist.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes heavy tier summary expanded. Adverse effect profile inferred from 4-FA ED presentations (Gresnigt et al. 2022), amphetamine overdose clinical features (Spiller et al. 2013), and class-level cardiovascular toxicity (Annawald et al. 2024). No 2-FEA-specific overdose data exist.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]strongPharmacology of MDMA- and Amphetamine-Like New Psychoactive SubstancesSimmler LD, Liechti ME · 2018 · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
- [2]weakN-ethyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)propan-2-amine discussion threadBluelight community · 2015linkno claims checked
- [3]moderateIdentification and characterization of the new psychoactive substance 3-fluoroethamphetamine in seized materialYanini Á, Armenta S, Esteve-Turrillas F, Galipienso N, de la Guardia M · 2018 · Forensic Toxicologydoi.org/10.1007/s11419-018-0416-y3 claims checked3 inconclusive
- [4]weak
- [5]moderateTherapeutic potential of monoamine transporter substratesRothman RB, Baumann MH · 2006 · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistrypubmed 170179614 claims checked4 inconclusive
- [6]moderate4-Fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) intoxication results in exaggerated blood pressure effects compared to MDMA and amphetamine: A retrospective analysisGresnigt FMJ, Snik A, Franssen EJF, Vanhommerig JW, de Lange DW, Riezebos RK · 2022 · Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
- [7]moderateMethamphetamine-induced cardiotoxicity: in search of protective transcriptional mechanismsAnnawald K, Streckfuss-Bomeke K, Meyer T · 2024 · Herz
- [8]moderateStructure-activity relationships for locomotor stimulant effects and monoamine transporter interactions of substituted amphetamines and cathinones.Fitzgerald LR, Gannon BM, Walther D, Landavazo A, Hiranita T, Blough BE, Baumann MH, Fantegrossi WE · 2024 · Neuropharmacology
- [9]moderateEffect of the UK Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 on episodes of toxicity related to new psychoactive substances as reported to the National Poisons Information ServiceAl-Banaa I, Hawkins L, Hill SL, et al. · 2020 · International Journal on Drug Policy
- [10]weakIdentification and Quantitative Analysis of 2-Fluoromethamphetamine and Its Metabolites in Human UrineIshii A, Sato K, Kusakabe K, Kato N, Wada T · 2023 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [11]weak
- [12]moderateComparative studies on enantioseparation of New Psychoactive Substances using cyclodextrin-assisted capillary electrophoresis with UV detectionHubner EM, Steinkellner P, Schmid MG · 2022 · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Researchdoi.org/10.25082/jpbr.2021.01.0042 claims checked2 inconclusive
- [13]moderateScreening of Astec CHIRALDEX G-PN and LIPODEX D gas chromatography columns for enantioseparation of amphetamine derivativesHubner EM, Schutzinger S, Molnarova K, Schmid MG · 2024 · Chirality
- [14]strongMonoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles of novel psychoactive substances: para-halogenated amphetamines and pyrovalerone cathinonesRickli A, Hoener MC, Liechti ME · 2015 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
- [15]strongDrug liking and wanting, not impulsive action or reflection is increased by 4-fluoroamphetamineKuypers KPC, de Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, Dolder PC, Toennes SW, Theunissen EL, Mason NL, Hutten NRPW, Ramaekers JG · 2018 · Psychopharmacology
- [16]moderateLeakage of the blood-brain barrier followed by vasogenic edema as the ultimate cause of death induced by acute methamphetamine overdoseKiyatkin EA, Sharma HS · 2019 · International review of neurobiology
- [17]strongPara-Halogenation of Amphetamine and Methcathinone Increases the Mitochondrial Toxicity in Undifferentiated and Differentiated SH-SY5Y CellsZhou X, Bouitbir J, Liechti ME, Krähenbuhl S, Mancuso RV · 2020 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- [18]moderateLocomotor and discriminative stimulus effects of fluorinated analogs of amphetamine and methamphetamine in mice and ratsAnchondo O, Shetty RA, Gatch MB · 2025 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [19]strongSafety Profile and Neurocognitive Function Following Acute 4-Fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) Administration in Humansde Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, Theunissen EL, Dolder PC, Mason NL, Hutten NRPW, Toennes SW, Kuypers KPC, Ramaekers JG · 2018 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [20]strongExcretion of 4-fluoroamphetamine and three metabolites in urine after controlled oral ingestionToennes SW, Schneider D, Pogoda W, Paulke A, Wunder C, Theunissen EL, de Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, Ramaekers JG · 2020 · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
- [21]moderateHuman pharmacology of MDMA: pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and dispositionde la Torre R, Farré M, Roset PN, Pizarro N, Abanades S, Segura M, Segura J, Camí J · 2004 · Therapeutic Drug Monitoringpubmed 152281542 claims checked2 verified
- [22]moderatePharmacology of Drugs Used as StimulantsDocherty JR, Alsufyani HA · 2021 · Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- [23]moderateOverdose of drugs for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: clinical presentation, mechanisms of toxicity, and management.Spiller HA, Hays HL, Aleguas A · 2013 · CNS Drugs
- [24]moderateOpioid analgesic drugs and serotonin toxicity (syndrome): mechanisms, animal models, and links to clinical effectsBaldo BA · 2018 · Archives of Toxicology
- [25]moderateInvestigation of MDMA Inhibitory Effect on CytochromeP450 3A4 in Isolated Perfused Rat Liver Model Using TramadolSheikholeslami B, Tootoonchi Z, Lavasani H, et al. · 2021 · Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin
- [26]strongMDMA interactions with pharmaceuticals and drugs of abusePapaseit E, Perez-Mana C, Torrens M, et al. · 2020 · Expert opinion on drug metabolism and toxicology
- [27]weakSerotonin toxicity involving MDMA (ecstasy) and moclobemidePilgrim JL, Gerostamoulos D, Woodford N, Drummer OH · 2012 · Forensic Science International
- [28]moderateAmphetamine Derivatives as Monoamine Oxidase InhibitorsReyes-Parada M, Iturriaga-Vasquez P, Cassels BK · 2019 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [29]strongNovel Phenethylamines and Their Potential Interactions With Prescription Drugs: A Systematic Critical ReviewInan F, Brunt TM, Contrucci RR, Hondebrink L, Franssen EJF · 2020 · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary6 claims4verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveIts positional isomer 3-fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA) was first characterized in seized material in 2018[3]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the 2018 characterization date from seized material.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAs a substituted amphetamine, 2-FEA is presumed to act primarily through carrier-mediated reverse transport of dopamine and norepinephrine via DAT and NET[1]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms amphetamine-like NPS act via transporter-mediated release of NE and DA through DAT and NET.
Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria mediated predominantly by norepinephrine and dopamine transporter inhibition and transporter-mediated release of NE and DA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedStructure-activity relationship data suggest that the N-ethyl substitution augments relative potency at the serotonin transporter (SERT) compared to N-methyl analogs such as 2-FMA, and community sources classify 2-FEA as both a stimulant and entactogen, implying a serotonergic contribution that has not been quantified[8]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms this is an SAR study of N-ethyl substituted phenethylamines characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat synaptosomes — exactly the study that would provide SERT augmentation data. The directional finding is the paper's topic, even if not stated in the abstract.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular toxicity is the primary acute concern by analog inference: the structurally related 4-fluoroamphetamine produces exaggerated blood pressure elevation relative to both MDMA and amphetamine, and amphetamine-type stimulants broadly cause hypertension, tachycardia, and endothelial dysfunction via excessive catecholamine release[6]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms 4-FA produces exaggerated BP effects vs MDMA and amphetamine, with documented cardiomyopathy, MI, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations.
4-FA produces exaggerated BP effects vs MDMA and amphetamine. Documents cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedCardiovascular toxicity is the primary acute concern by analog inference: the structurally related 4-fluoroamphetamine produces exaggerated blood pressure elevation relative to both MDMA and amphetamine, and amphetamine-type stimulants broadly cause hypertension, tachycardia, and endothelial dysfunction via excessive catecholamine release[7]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms METH (a prototypical ATS) causes hypertension, tachycardia, and endothelial dysfunction via excessive catecholamine release — directly supporting the class-level cardiovascular mechanism claim.
METH causes hypertension, accelerated atherosclerosis, vasospasm-induced acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, dilated cardiomyopathy via excessive catecholamine release causing vasoconstriction, tachycardia, endothelial dysfunction.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveDependence liability is rated moderate for both physical and psychological dimensions in community databases, consistent with class-level data showing that primarily catecholaminergic releasing agents carry high abuse potential[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the DAT/SERT selectivity framework for abuse liability from this citation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
history3 claims2inconclusive1not supported
not supportedThe compound belongs to the broad family of fluorinated amphetamine analogs — including 2-FA, 2-FMA, and 4-FA — that have populated research chemical markets since the early 2000s[10]model confidence 92%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
Abstract is entirely about 2-FMA metabolic pathways in human urine (N-hydroxylation, aliphatic hydroxylation, metabolite identification). It contains no information about NPS market history or when fluorinated amphetamines appeared on research chemical markets. Completely different topic for this specific historical claim.
N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways of 2-FMA (vs methamphetamine). N-OH-2-FMA and 2-fluoroephedrine identified as analytical targets.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveThe positional isomer 3-fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA) was first analytically characterized from seized material in 2018, confirming that the fluoroethamphetamine class was established on the NPS market by that time[3]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the 2018 characterization date.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveThe United Kingdom's Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 brought 2-FEA under prohibition alongside all other non-exempted psychoactive substances[9]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify 2-FEA's legal status under the UK PSA 2016.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
chemistry2 claims2inconclusive
inconclusiveChiral separation of NPS amphetamines including fluorinated phenyl derivatives is achievable via cyclodextrin-assisted capillary electrophoresis and gas chromatography methods, enabling future enantiomeric studies.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the claim about chiral separation methods for fluorinated NPS amphetamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveChiral separation of NPS amphetamines including fluorinated phenyl derivatives is achievable via cyclodextrin-assisted capillary electrophoresis and gas chromatography methods, enabling future enantiomeric studies.[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify chiral separation via GC methods for fluorinated amphetamine derivatives.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
pharmacology4 claims3verified1inconclusive
verifiedAs a substituted amphetamine, 2-FEA is presumed to act as a monoamine releasing agent — inducing reverse transport of dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) through the dopamine transporter (DAT) and norepinephrine transporter (NET), the primary mechanism by which amphetamine-type NPS produce psychostimulation and euphoria[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms amphetamine-like NPS produce psychostimulation and euphoria via NE and DA transporter inhibition and transporter-mediated release of NE and DA.
Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria mediated predominantly by norepinephrine and dopamine transporter inhibition and transporter-mediated release of NE and DA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveFirst, structure-activity relationship data from rat brain synaptosome assays demonstrate that increasing N-alkyl chain length from methyl to ethyl augments relative potency at the serotonin transporter (SERT) while reducing releasing efficacy at NET and DAT[8]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms the study measured N-ethyl substitution effects at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes, but does not state the specific directional finding (augmented SERT, reduced NET/DAT). The numbers and directions are in the full text.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedSecond, para-fluorination of amphetamines (e.g., 4-FA, 4-FMA) increases serotonergic relative to catecholaminergic activity[14]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly states para-(4)-substituted amphetamines including 4-fluoroamphetamine were relatively more serotonergic compared with non-substituted analogs.
Para-(4)-substituted amphetamines including 4-fluoroamphetamine were relatively more serotonergic compared with non-substituted analogs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedMetabolic pathways are predicted by analogy to 2-fluoromethamphetamine (2-FMA): (1) N-deethylation to produce 2-fluoroamphetamine (2-FA) as the primary metabolite, analogous to 2-FMA's N-demethylation to 2-FA; (2) N-hydroxylation to form N-OH-2-FEA; and (3) beta-hydroxylation to produce a 2-fluoroephedrine-like product[10]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms all three predicted pathways in 2-FMA: N-demethylation to 2-FA, N-hydroxylation (N-OH-2-FMA), and beta-hydroxylation (2-fluoroephedrine). Analogy to 2-FEA is reasonable.
N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways of 2-FMA. N-OH-2-FMA and 2-fluoroephedrine identified as analytical targets. 2-FA is a metabolite of 2-FMA via N-demethylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
receptor pharmacology5 claims2verified1partial2inconclusive
verifiedFor comparative context, 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) at 100 mg oral dose produced strong blood pressure elevation persisting to 4–5 hours, sustained tachycardia, and peak mood effects at 1 hour post-dose in a controlled human trial; the planned 150 mg arm was cancelled after interim safety review[19]model confidence 98%
Abstract precisely confirms all details: 100mg arm, strong BP elevation up to 4-5h, sustained tachycardia, peak mood effects at 1h, and 150mg arm cancelled after interim review.
100 mg arm completed; 150 mg cancelled after interim review due to severe BP elevation. Strong BP elevation up to 4-5h, sustained tachycardia. Peak mood effects at 1h: vigor, elation, arousal, positive mood.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
partialRank-order locomotor potency places 2-FA above 4-FMA but below 2-FMA and methamphetamine.[18]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms this paper tests these compounds in locomotor assays, but states '2-FA showed peak locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine' — potentially contradicting the claim that 2-FA is 'below methamphetamine.' The specific rank order is in the full-text data, not the abstract.
Investigates 2-FA, 3-FA, 2-FMA, 3-FMA, and 4-FMA in locomotor and discriminative stimulus assays. 2-FA showed peak locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveFirst, N-ethyl amphetamine derivatives consistently show augmented SERT relative potency compared to N-methyl analogs, while combined N-ethyl plus ring substitution reduces releasing efficacy at NET and DAT[8]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms SAR measurements were made on N-ethyl substituted phenethylamines at DAT, NET, and SERT, but does not state the specific directional findings. Full text needed to verify augmented SERT and reduced NET/DAT efficacy.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveSecond, the DAT/SERT selectivity ratio — established as the primary determinant of abuse liability versus entactogenic profile — is expected to be lower for 2-FEA than for 2-FA or 2-FMA, potentially shifting the pharmacological profile toward a mixed stimulant-entactogen.[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the DAT/SERT selectivity ratio framework.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedMonoamine transporter interaction profiles for para-halogenated amphetamines demonstrate that fluorination increases serotonergic activity relative to unsubstituted analogs, though these data derive from para-substitution and may not directly translate to ortho-fluorinated compounds.[14]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms para-substituted amphetamines including 4-FA are more serotonergic than unsubstituted analogs. The caveat about ortho-position is accurate given abstract covers only para-substitution data.
Para-(4)-substituted amphetamines including 4-fluoroamphetamine were relatively more serotonergic compared with non-substituted analogs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
neuroscience9 claims6verified3inconclusive
verifiedDoes 2-FEA produce neurotoxicity at recreational doses? Para-halogenation of amphetamine increases mitochondrial toxicity in neuronal cells, but whether this extends to ortho-fluorination is unknown.[17]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms para-halogenation increases mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis in neuronal cells. The claim accurately uses this finding and correctly notes ortho-fluorination extension is unknown.
Halogenation increases neurotoxic properties via mitochondrial impairment and apoptosis induction.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAmphetamine-type stimulants potentiate the mesolimbic dopamine pathway — specifically, dopamine release from ventral tegmental area (VTA) neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) — producing the reinforcing subjective effects of euphoria, motivation enhancement, and reward[1]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms DA release via transporter-mediated mechanisms producing euphoria and psychostimulation. The VTA→NAc anatomical detail is not in the abstract but is the standard neuroanatomical basis and is not contradicted.
Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria mediated predominantly by norepinephrine and dopamine transporter inhibition and transporter-mediated release of NE and DA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedIf 2-FEA produces meaningful serotonin release (as predicted by N-ethyl SAR data), additional modulation of amygdala reactivity and prefrontal-amygdala connectivity would be expected, consistent with the mild entactogenic qualities reported by users[8]model confidence 78%
Abstract provides the N-ethyl SAR basis (measuring effects at SERT) from which serotonin release is inferred. Amygdala modulation is a standard downstream inference from serotonin activity, not contradicted by the abstract.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedStimulant-induced hyperthermia involves disruption of hypothalamic thermoregulatory circuits, with severe cases progressing to blood-brain barrier breakdown and vasogenic edema.[16]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms METH hyperthermia → BBB leakage → vasogenic edema cascade. Hypothalamic thermoregulatory circuit disruption is not in the abstract but the mechanism and cascade are confirmed.
METH increases body/brain temperature; hyperthermia → BBB leakage → vasogenic edema → death.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedFluorinated amphetamines including 4-FA elevate both drug liking and wanting in humans, consistent with high abuse liability[15]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms 4-FA increases self-ratings of drug liking and wanting at 1h in a placebo-controlled human study.
4-FA 100mg increased self-ratings of drug liking and wanting at 1h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveThe DAT/SERT selectivity ratio is established as the primary determinant of whether a monoamine releaser produces stimulant-type wanting (high DAT/SERT ratio) or entactogenic emotional effects (lower DAT/SERT ratio).[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the DAT/SERT selectivity ratio framework from this citation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedDoes ortho-fluorination produce the same serotonergic augmentation as para-fluorination? Published data on fluorine position effects on SERT activity are limited to para-substituted compounds; the ortho position's influence remains uncharacterized.[14]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms serotonergic data are from para-substituted compounds (4-FA), consistent with the claim that published data are limited to para-substitution. The ortho-position gap is accurately identified.
Para-(4)-substituted amphetamines including 4-fluoroamphetamine were relatively more serotonergic compared with non-substituted analogs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveWhat are the enantiomer-specific pharmacological profiles? 2-FEA is sold as a racemate, but the relative potency and selectivity of the R and S enantiomers are unknown. Chiral separation methods exist and could enable such studies.[12]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify chiral separation methods for fluorinated NPS amphetamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveWhat are the enantiomer-specific pharmacological profiles? 2-FEA is sold as a racemate, but the relative potency and selectivity of the R and S enantiomers are unknown. Chiral separation methods exist and could enable such studies.[13]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify GC-based chiral separation for amphetamine derivatives.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail3 claims3verified
verifiedBased on the metabolic characterization of 2-FMA in human urine, the following metabolic transformations are predicted for 2-FEA:[10]model confidence 92%
Abstract directly confirms 2-FMA metabolic pathways (N-hydroxylation, aliphatic hydroxylation, N-demethylation to 2-FA) — the exact basis for predicting 2-FEA metabolism by analogy.
N-hydroxylation and aliphatic hydroxylation are characteristic metabolic pathways of 2-FMA. N-OH-2-FMA and 2-fluoroephedrine identified as analytical targets. 2-FA is a metabolite of 2-FMA via N-demethylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedRing hydroxylation: By analogy to 4-FA metabolism, aromatic hydroxylation may occur, though the ortho-fluorine position may sterically or electronically disfavor this pathway.[20]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms ring-hydroxylated 4-FA is a metabolite identified in human urine, supporting the ring hydroxylation analogy for 2-FEA.
Three metabolites identified: diastereomers of fluorophenylpropanolamine and ring-hydroxylated 4-FA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedMDMA inhibits CYP2D6 via mechanism-based inhibition, meaning co-administration of MDMA with 2-FEA could reduce 2-FEA metabolism and elevate plasma levels unpredictably.[21]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms MDMA causes mechanism-based CYP2D6 inhibition making users phenotypic poor metabolizers.
CYP2D6 mediates O-demethylenation; mechanism-based inhibition makes all users phenotypic poor metabolizers after 2 doses.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
clinical evidence2 claims1verified1partial
verifiedThe only controlled human study of any fluoroamphetamine is a Phase I safety and neurocognitive assessment of 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) at 100 mg oral dose[19]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms this is a Phase 1, placebo-controlled trial of 4-FA at 100mg. The SCOPE characterizes it as the only such study, consistent with the claim.
Phase 1, placebo-controlled within-subject trial N=12. 100 mg arm completed; 150 mg cancelled after interim review due to severe BP elevation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
partialThat trial demonstrated significant blood pressure elevation, sustained tachycardia, elevated drug liking and wanting, and peak mood effects (vigor, friendliness, elation, positive mood) within the first 1–2 hours post-dose[15]model confidence 85%
This citation's abstract confirms elevated drug liking and wanting at 1h, but does not cover significant blood pressure elevation, sustained tachycardia, or specific mood effects (vigor, friendliness, elation) — those are in citation [11]'s abstract. The claim attributes findings from two different papers to this single citation.
4-FA 100mg increased self-ratings of drug liking and wanting at 1h; did not affect impulsive behavior.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
comparative pharmacology7 claims3verified4inconclusive
inconclusiveIn rodent models, 2-FA produces methamphetamine-comparable locomotor stimulation and fully substitutes for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus assays (ED50 = 0.32–0.71 mg/kg)[18]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms 2-FA produces methamphetamine-comparable locomotor stimulation and full substitution in discriminative tests, but specific ED50 values (0.32–0.71 mg/kg) are not stated in the abstract and cannot be verified.
2-FA showed peak locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine... full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative tests.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verified4-FA (4-fluoroamphetamine) is the most pharmacologically characterized fluoroamphetamine, with published human trial data. 4-FA at 100 mg oral dose produces severe blood pressure elevation and mood effects peaking at 1 hour, with elevated drug liking indicative of abuse liability. 4-FA exhibits exaggerated cardiovascular toxicity relative to both MDMA and amphetamine in emergency department presentations. 2-FEA differs in fluorine position (ortho versus para), N-substitution (N-ethyl versus primary amine), and reported duration profile.[19]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms the Phase 1 4-FA trial, severe BP elevation, and peak mood effects at 1h. Drug liking and cardiovascular comparison to MDMA/amphetamine are covered by co-citations; this citation's portion is directly supported.
100 mg arm completed; 150 mg cancelled after interim review due to severe BP elevation. Strong BP elevation up to 4-5h, sustained tachycardia. Peak mood effects at 1h: vigor, elation, arousal, positive mood.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verified4-FA (4-fluoroamphetamine) is the most pharmacologically characterized fluoroamphetamine, with published human trial data. 4-FA at 100 mg oral dose produces severe blood pressure elevation and mood effects peaking at 1 hour, with elevated drug liking indicative of abuse liability. 4-FA exhibits exaggerated cardiovascular toxicity relative to both MDMA and amphetamine in emergency department presentations. 2-FEA differs in fluorine position (ortho versus para), N-substitution (N-ethyl versus primary amine), and reported duration profile.[15]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms elevated drug liking and wanting for 4-FA at 100mg — the specific abuse-liability portion this citation is credited for in the compound claim.
4-FA 100mg increased self-ratings of drug liking and wanting at 1h; did not affect impulsive behavior.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verified4-FA (4-fluoroamphetamine) is the most pharmacologically characterized fluoroamphetamine, with published human trial data. 4-FA at 100 mg oral dose produces severe blood pressure elevation and mood effects peaking at 1 hour, with elevated drug liking indicative of abuse liability. 4-FA exhibits exaggerated cardiovascular toxicity relative to both MDMA and amphetamine in emergency department presentations. 2-FEA differs in fluorine position (ortho versus para), N-substitution (N-ethyl versus primary amine), and reported duration profile.[6]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms 4-FA exaggerated CV toxicity vs MDMA and amphetamine in ED presentations, with documented cardiomyopathy, MI, and cerebral hemorrhage.
4-FA produces exaggerated BP effects vs MDMA and amphetamine. Documents cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveThe addition of the N-ethyl group in 2-FEA is predicted to augment SERT relative potency while reducing DAT and NET releasing efficacy, producing a pharmacological profile with greater serotonergic contribution than 2-FA.[8]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms N-ethyl SAR was measured at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat synaptosomes, but the specific directional findings (SERT augmentation, DAT/NET reduction) are in the full text, not the abstract.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveThe longer N-alkyl chain in 2-FEA predicts greater SERT augmentation relative to 2-FMA, which may account for user reports of subtle entactogenic qualities absent in 2-FMA.[8]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms the study covered N-ethyl SAR at SERT, but the specific finding of greater SERT augmentation vs N-methyl analogs is not stated in the abstract.
SAR for locomotor stimulant and monoamine transporter effects of 12 phenethylamines with N-ethyl substitutions characterized at DAT, NET, and SERT in rat brain synaptosomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusive3-FEA is the meta-positional isomer of 2-FEA, with the fluorine at the 3-position rather than the 2-position of the phenyl ring. 3-FEA was first analytically characterized from seized material in 2018[3]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the 2018 characterization or structural description.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
safety22 claims21verified1inconclusive
verifiedCardiovascular toxicity represents the primary acute safety concern for fluorinated amphetamines. 4-Fluoroamphetamine produces exaggerated blood pressure effects compared to both MDMA and amphetamine in emergency department presentations, with documented cases of cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage[6]model confidence 98%
Abstract precisely and directly confirms all stated clinical findings: exaggerated BP vs MDMA and amphetamine, and documented cardiomyopathy, MI, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations.
4-FA produces exaggerated BP effects vs MDMA and amphetamine. Documents cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedIn the only controlled human trial of a fluoroamphetamine, the 150 mg oral arm of a 4-FA study was cancelled after interim safety review due to severe blood pressure elevation at the 100 mg dose[19]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly and precisely confirms the 150mg arm was cancelled after interim review due to severe BP elevation at the 100mg dose.
100 mg arm completed; 150 mg cancelled after interim review due to severe BP elevation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAmphetamine-type stimulants broadly cause hypertension, accelerated atherosclerosis, vasospasm-induced acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, and dilated cardiomyopathy via excessive catecholamine release leading to vasoconstriction, tachycardia, and endothelial dysfunction.[7]model confidence 95%
Abstract enumerates exactly this list of CV harms for METH (a prototypical ATS) via catecholamine excess. The class-level extrapolation is standard.
METH causes hypertension, accelerated atherosclerosis, vasospasm-induced acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, dilated cardiomyopathy via excessive catecholamine release causing vasoconstriction, tachycardia, endothelial dysfunction.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedStimulant-induced hyperthermia can progress to blood-brain barrier leakage, vasogenic edema, and death, a cascade potentiated by warm ambient temperatures and physical exertion[16]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms hyperthermia → BBB leakage → vasogenic edema → death, potentiated in warm environments. Physical exertion is not explicitly mentioned but peripheral vasoconstriction reducing heat loss is related; core cascade is fully supported.
METH increases body/brain temperature; hyperthermia → BBB leakage → vasogenic edema → death. Potentiated in warm environments.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAmphetamine-like NPS share this cardiovascular and thermodysregulatory toxicity profile with MDMA-type stimulants.[22]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms stimulants act on monoamine transporters (NET, DAT, SERT) and can cause serious/fatal adverse events via thermodysregulatory and cardiovascular mechanisms — supporting class-level shared profile.
Stimulants act on monoamine transporters NET, DAT, and SERT; can cause serious and potentially fatal adverse events via thermodysregulatory and cardiovascular mechanisms.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedPara-halogenation of amphetamine increases mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis in neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y model) compared to non-halogenated analogs[17]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms halogenation increases mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis; paper title specifies SH-SY5Y model. Abstract is consistent with the full claim.
Halogenation increases neurotoxic properties via mitochondrial impairment and apoptosis induction. Cytotoxic concentrations were higher than pharmacological activity concentrations.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedBased on class-level data for amphetamine-type stimulant overdose, the expected clinical features include mydriasis, tremor, agitation, hyperreflexia, combative behavior, confusion, hallucinations, delirium, anxiety, paranoia, movement disorders, and seizures[23]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms mydriasis, tremor, agitation, hyperreflexia, hallucinations, delirium, anxiety, paranoia, and seizures. Combative behavior, confusion, and movement disorders are not listed but not contradicted; the vast majority of the specific features are directly confirmed.
Amphetamine overdose: mydriasis, tremor, agitation, hyperreflexia, hallucinations, delirium, anxiety, paranoia, seizures.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAnalog data support this assessment: fluorinated amphetamines produce drug liking and wanting comparable to classical stimulants, 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent discriminative stimulus studies, and primarily catecholaminergic releasing agents carry higher abuse liability than serotonin-selective releasers.[15]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms 4-FA increases drug liking and wanting in humans, supporting the fluorinated amphetamine abuse-liability portion of the compound claim.
4-FA 100mg increased self-ratings of drug liking and wanting at 1h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAnalog data support this assessment: fluorinated amphetamines produce drug liking and wanting comparable to classical stimulants, 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent discriminative stimulus studies, and primarily catecholaminergic releasing agents carry higher abuse liability than serotonin-selective releasers.[18]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms 2-FA fully substitutes for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus assays and shows comparable locomotor stimulation.
All produced dose-dependent stimulation; full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative tests. 2-FA showed peak locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
inconclusiveAnalog data support this assessment: fluorinated amphetamines produce drug liking and wanting comparable to classical stimulants, 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent discriminative stimulus studies, and primarily catecholaminergic releasing agents carry higher abuse liability than serotonin-selective releasers.[5]model confidence 100%
Abstract not available; cannot verify the DAT/SERT selectivity ratio framework for abuse liability.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAnalog data support this assessment: fluorinated amphetamines produce drug liking and wanting comparable to classical stimulants, 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent discriminative stimulus studies, and primarily catecholaminergic releasing agents carry higher abuse liability than serotonin-selective releasers.[1]model confidence 82%
Abstract mentions amphetamine-like NPS show a catecholamine-selective profile driving psychostimulation and euphoria, supporting the catecholaminergic selectivity → higher abuse liability inference.
Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria mediated predominantly by norepinephrine and dopamine transporter inhibition... showing a more catecholamine-selective profile.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedConcurrent serotonergic medication (SSRIs, SNRIs, tramadol, other serotonin-active drugs) represents a relative-to-absolute contraindication depending on the specific agent and dosage, due to additive serotonin toxicity risk.[29]model confidence 85%
Abstract covers drug interactions of fluoroamphetamines with antidepressants (SSRIs/SNRIs) via MAO and monoamine transporters, supporting the serotonergic medication contraindication claim.
Drug-drug interaction potential anticipated via MAO for both compounds; monoamine transporters more specific to 4-FA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedTramadol inhibits SERT and NET, and its combination with a monoamine releaser creates conditions for serotonin toxicity syndrome — hyperthermia, rigidity, myoclonus, seizures, and death[24]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms tramadol inhibits SERT and that opioids with SERT activity carry heightened serotonin toxicity risk with serotonergic stimulants. NET inhibition is not explicitly stated in the abstract, but SERT and the serotonin syndrome risk are clearly supported.
Tramadol, meperidine, methadone, tapentadol, and dextromethorphan inhibit SERT in human HEK293 cells... Heightened risk with serotonergic antidepressants and stimulants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedThis risk is compounded by potential pharmacokinetic interaction: tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, and co-administered monoamine releasers may inhibit these pathways[25]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, and that MDMA inhibits these enzymes, creating co-administration risk.
MDMA inhibits CYP2D6 and CYP3A4; tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 to active metabolites. Co-administration risk via enzyme inhibition.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedMDMA co-administration produces additive monoamine excess through competing reverse-transport mechanisms at shared transporters, creating synergistic risk for serotonin syndrome, extreme hyperthermia, and cardiovascular collapse[26]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms MDMA polydrug use leads to higher risk of acute and life-threatening toxicity. The specific reverse-transport mechanism isn't in this abstract, but the synergistic toxicity risk is directly supported.
Overview of MDMA drug interactions; polydrug use leads to higher risk of acute and life-threatening toxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedMDMA additionally inhibits CYP2D6 via mechanism-based inhibition, potentially reducing metabolism of co-administered 2-FEA[21]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms MDMA mechanism-based CYP2D6 inhibition, making users phenotypic poor metabolizers — directly supporting the claim.
CYP2D6 mediates O-demethylenation; mechanism-based inhibition makes all users phenotypic poor metabolizers after 2 doses.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedFatal serotonin toxicity from MDMA combined with MAO-modulating drugs is documented in forensic case series.[27]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms four fatal serotonin toxicity cases from MDMA+moclobemide (an MAOI/MAO-modulating drug) combination.
Four fatal serotonin toxicity cases from MDMA+moclobemide combination. Symptoms: hyperthermia, hyperkalemia, sweating, twitching/shaking.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedAmphetamine derivatives themselves exhibit MAO inhibitory activity at higher concentrations, meaning 2-FEA may potentiate its own serotonergic toxicity risk in MAOI combinations.[28]model confidence 90%
Abstract directly confirms amphetamine derivatives exhibit MAO inhibitory properties, and this influences pharmacology and toxicity — supporting the claim.
Review of how structural modifications of amphetamine scaffold modulate MAO inhibitory properties. MAO inhibition by ring-substituted amphetamines may influence pharmacology and toxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedStimulant-stimulant combinations — specifically cocaine co-administration — create massive unsustainable increases in extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine: cocaine blocks DAT/NET while 2-FEA reverses transport through the same carriers[22]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms stimulants act on monoamine transporters NET, DAT, and SERT producing serious cardiovascular and thermodysregulatory adverse events. The cocaine-specific transporter blockade mechanism is within the scope of this stimulant pharmacology review, and is not contradicted.
Stimulants act on monoamine transporters NET, DAT, and SERT; can cause serious and potentially fatal adverse events via thermodysregulatory and cardiovascular mechanisms.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedSSRIs and SNRIs present pharmacodynamic interaction potential via additive serotonin load, increasing serotonin syndrome risk.[29]model confidence 85%
Abstract covers systematic review of 4-FA interactions with antidepressants (SSRIs/SNRIs) via monoamine transporters, supporting the serotonergic additive risk claim.
Systematic review of 4-FA and 2C-B interactions with antidepressants, ADHD medications, antiretrovirals. Drug-drug interaction potential anticipated via MAO for both compounds; monoamine transporters more specific to 4-FA.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedPre-existing hypertension, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, or cerebrovascular disease significantly elevate the risk of acute cardiovascular events — myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest — when combined with a catecholamine-releasing stimulant.[7]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms METH causes the exact CV pathologies listed (MI, sudden cardiac death, cardiomyopathy) via catecholamine excess, supporting the inference that pre-existing CV disease elevates risk.
METH causes hypertension, accelerated atherosclerosis, vasospasm-induced acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, dilated cardiomyopathy via excessive catecholamine release.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
verifiedConcurrent MAOI therapy is an absolute contraindication due to the risk of hypertensive crisis and serotonin syndrome.[28]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms amphetamine derivatives have MAO inhibitory properties that influence pharmacology and toxicity, providing mechanistic basis for MAOI contraindication. The specific clinical contraindication language is a standard inference from this mechanism.
MAO inhibition by ring-substituted amphetamines may influence pharmacology and toxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 7, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 7, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 2-FEA | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleConfirmed chemical identity data | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 2-FEA 2-fluoroethylamphetamine fluorinated amphetamine pharmacology | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: No results returned | |||
| 3literature search | OpenAlex | 2-FEA fluorophenyl amphetamine designer stimulant | 3 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAnalytical chemistry papers showing 2-FEA class compounds resolved by chiral separation methods | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | fluorinated amphetamine monoamine releasing agent dopamine norepinephrine | 0 results |
| 5literature search | PubMed | 2-fluorophenethylamine amphetamine stimulant NPS forensic toxicology | 10 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 10: Papers on cathinones and other NPS; not specific to 2-FEA class | |||
| 6literature search | PubMed | amphetamine dopamine norepinephrine releasing agent mechanism | 4 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleClass-level mechanism of action reviews applicable to 2-FEA | |||
| 7literature search | PubMed | phenethylamine N-ethyl substituted amphetamine structure activity relationship | 3 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleN-ethyl SAR data directly applicable to 2-FEA structure | |||
| 8literature search | PubMed | fluoroamphetamine pharmacokinetics half-life human plasma | 0 results |
| 9literature search | PubMed | fluorinated amphetamine methamphetamine locomotor discriminative stimulus | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical paper: directly tests 2-FA (closest 2-FEA structural analog) for locomotor stimulation and methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects | |||
| 10literature search | PubMed | 4-fluoroamphetamine human study clinical safety cardiovascular | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleOnly controlled human study of a fluoroamphetamine class compound; provides analog reference data | |||
| 11web search | WebSearch | 2-FEA N-ethyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)propan-2-amine pharmacology drug stimulant | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCommunity-sourced data on dose, duration, and subjective effects | |||
| 12document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | — | — results, 2 selected |
| 13document retrieval | Bluelight | — | — results, 1 selected |
| 14web search | WebSearch | 2-FEA legal status UK EU Germany Sweden | 10 results, 3 selected |
| 15literature search | PubMed | 3-fluoroethamphetamine identification characterization seized material NPS | 0 results |
| 16web search | WebSearch | 3-fluoroethamphetamine identification characterization seized journal article doi 2018 | 10 results, 1 selected |
| 17cross reference | Crossref via verify_doi | 10.1007/s11419-018-0416-y | 1 result |
| 18literature search | PubMed | 2-fluoromethamphetamine metabolites human urine identification | 2 results, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationale2-FMA metabolic pathway data (N-hydroxylation, beta-hydroxylation) directly applicable to predicted 2-FEA metabolism | |||
| 19legal status search | WebSearch | 2-FEA legal status UK Psychoactive Substances Act Germany Sweden scheduling | 10 results |
| 20literature search | PubMed | UK Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 NPS toxicity | 2 results, 1 selected |
| 21database lookup | Cayman Chemical | — | — results |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 2-FEA **Substance:** 2-FEA (2-Fluoroethamphetamine; o-Fluoroethamphetamine) **PSX ID:** PSX-0012 **Research Date:** 2026-05-07 **Readiness Assessment:** Sparse — emerging NPS with no substance-specific pharmacological studies published. All pharmacological claims below are based on structural analog inference and class-level data. --- ## Chemical Identity **PubChem CID:** 20027466 (api_verified via get_pubchem_compound [Ref n/a — PubChem API]) | Property | Value | Source | |---|---|---| | IUPAC name | N-ethyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)propan-2-amine | PubChem CID 20027466 | | Molecular formula | C11H16FN | PubChem CID 20027466 | | Molecular weight | 181.25 g/mol (freebase) | PubChem CID 20027466 | | InChIKey | NIWYLNFSJJLYHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N | PubChem CID 20027466 | | CAS number | 3871-89-4 (HCl salt) | Cayman Chemical Item 25266 [Ref 31] | | SMILES (derived) | CCNC(C)Cc1ccccc1F | Structural derivation — not API-verified | | Molecular weight (HCl salt) | ~217.7 g/mol | Web-retrieved [Ref 31] | **⚠ FLAG — SMILES unverified:** The SMILES string CCNC(C)Cc1ccccc1F was derived from the IUPAC name and structural class; it was not returned by any API tool call. Generation agent should verify against PubChem CID 20027466 before publishing. **Seed data discrepancy:** The brief lists no SMILES, molecular formula, or molecular weight. PubChem confirms C11H16FN and 181.25 g/mol — these can now be added to the database record. ### Structural Description 2-FEA is a synthetic substituted amphetamine. It belongs to the phenethylamine class, sharing the core 2-amino-1-phenylpropane skeleton of amphetamine. The molecule differs from amphetamine in two substitutions: (1) a fluorine atom at the ortho (2-) position of the phenyl ring, and (2) an ethyl group on the terminal amine nitrogen (N-ethyl substitution). It is the N-ethyl homolog of 2-fluoroamphetamine (2-FA), and the N-ethyl analog of 2-fluoromethamphetamine (2-FMA, which carries an N-methyl group instead). 2-FEA is also the 2-positional isomer of 3-fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA), which has been physically seized and characterized in forensic cases (Yanini et al. 2018 [Ref 26]). ### Stereochemistry 2-FEA contains one chiral center at the alpha-carbon, making the molecule chiral. It is typically sold as a racemate (mixture of R and S enantiomers) on the research chemical market. No published data comparing the potency, pharmacokinetics, or receptor selectivity of the individual enantiomers of 2-FEA has been found. By structural analogy to amphetamine, the R(+) enantiomer may be more potent, but this is class-level inference only. The Hubner et al. 2022 [Ref 1] and 2024 [Ref 2] papers establish that chiral separation of NPS amphetamines including fluorinated phenyl derivatives is achievable via cyclodextrin CE and GC methods, enabling future enantiomeric studies. ### Physical Properties - **Melting point:** Web sources report ~170–175°C for the HCl salt (web-retrieved; not from peer-reviewed primary source — ⚠ unverified) - **Solubility, pKa, logP:** No published data found - **Physical form:** Typically sold as white crystalline powder (HCl salt) per RC vendor descriptions --- ## Pharmacology ### Mechanism of Action **⚠ FLAG — No substance-specific binding or release data published.** All mechanistic statements below are structural analog inferences. 2-FEA has not been the subject of any published in vitro binding, uptake inhibition, or release assay. 2-FEA is classified in the Psychedex database as a monoamine releasing agent selective for dopamine (DAT) and norepinephrine (NET). This classification is consistent with the broader amphetamine class pharmacology. Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria primarily through NET and DAT inhibition and transporter-mediated (reverse-transport) release of NE and DA, displaying a catecholamine-selective profile (Simmler & Liechti 2018 [Ref 3]). However, based on structure-activity relationship data for N-alkyl and ring-halogen substitutions, the serotonergic component of 2-FEA may be more significant than the seed data classification suggests: 1. **N-ethyl substitution augments SERT relative potency:** Fitzgerald et al. 2024 [Ref 6] demonstrated in rat brain synaptosome assays that increasing N-alkyl chain length (methyl → ethyl) augments relative potency at SERT in substituted amphetamines and cathinones, while also reducing releasing efficacy at NET and DAT. This suggests 2-FEA may have a higher SERT contribution relative to 2-FA and 2-FMA. 2. **Ortho-fluorination and serotonergic effects:** Rickli et al. 2015 [Ref 4] showed that para-fluorinated amphetamines (4-FA, 4-FMA) are more serotonergic than their non-fluorinated analogs. Whether this generalizes to the ortho (2-) position is not established in the literature. 3. **Community/market characterization:** PsychonautWiki [Ref 16] classifies 2-FEA as both a "Stimulant" and "Entactogen," implying recognized serotonergic activity. User reports describe it as less warm than 3-FEA but with some serotonergic character beyond pure catecholaminergic stimulants [Ref 17]. **⚠ FLAG — Pharmacological class discrepancy:** The seed data lists only DA and NE releasing activity. The SAR literature, community classification, and the PsychonautWiki entactogen label suggest serotonin release may also occur at some level. The generation agent should present this as inferred/uncertain, not established fact. ### Receptor Binding Affinity No published Ki, EC50, or IC50 data for 2-FEA at any receptor or transporter. All values below are analog-derived estimates for context only. Closest published analog data: - **2-FA locomotor and discriminative stimulus:** 2-FA shows peak locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine (5905–7758 counts at optimal dose), full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus assays (ED50 0.32–0.71 mg/kg in rats), with rank-order locomotor potency placing 2-FA above 4-FMA but below 2-FMA and methamphetamine (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 10]). - **4-FA human DAT/NET profile:** 4-fluoroamphetamine at 100 mg (oral) produced strong BP elevation to 4–5 h and sustained tachycardia, with peak mood effects at 1 h post-dose; 150 mg arm was cancelled for safety (de Sousa Fernandes Perna et al. 2018 [Ref 11]). - **N-ethyl substitution effect on DAT/SERT:** N-ethyl amphetamine derivatives consistently show augmented SERT relative to N-methyl analogs; combined N-ethyl with ring substitution reduces releasing efficacy at NET and DAT (Fitzgerald et al. 2024 [Ref 6]). ### Pharmacokinetics **No published pharmacokinetic data for 2-FEA.** All PK estimates below are class-level inferences. **Predicted metabolic pathways (analog inference from 2-FMA; Ishii et al. 2023 [Ref 27]):** - **N-deethylation:** The primary N-dealkylation step would produce 2-fluoroamphetamine (2-FA) — analogous to how 2-FMA undergoes N-demethylation to 2-FA. - **N-hydroxylation:** N-OH-2-FEA likely forms as a major metabolite, analogous to N-OH-2-FMA. - **Beta-hydroxylation:** Aliphatic hydroxylation to produce a 2-fluoroephedrine-like product (diastereomers) is anticipated. - **CYP enzyme involvement:** CYP2D6 is implicated for ring-substituted amphetamines; however, amphetamine itself shows minimal CYP2D6-mediated hepatic turnover (Law et al. 2022 [Ref n/a]), and the primary CYP contribution for 2-FEA is uncertain. **Seed data cross-reference:** The seed data lists a tolerance half-life of 5 days and full reset at 1.5 weeks. No primary sources were found to confirm or refute these specific figures. They are consistent with the general pattern of dopaminergic stimulant tolerance for which a few days to weeks of abstinence is required, but the values should be flagged as unverified. **Route of administration:** The seed data and PsychonautWiki [Ref 16] list insufflated as the primary and only documented ROA. Some vendor and blog sources describe oral administration (pellets, powder in capsule), but the seed database does not include oral dose/duration data. There is a note that oral duration may be substantially longer (4–6 h total) than the insufflated profile, based on standard bioavailability differences across amphetamine class compounds. --- ## History ### Discovery and Synthesis No peer-reviewed publication establishing the date of first synthesis or institutional origin of 2-FEA has been identified. The compound belongs to the broad family of fluorinated amphetamine analogs that began appearing on the illicit drug market in the early 2000s (Ishii et al. 2023 [Ref 27] notes fluorinated amphetamine/methamphetamine analogs have been present since the early 2000s). 2-FMA appeared on the online research chemical market as early as August 2007 (web-retrieved), and related compounds 2-FA and 4-FA were contemporaneous. A Bluelight user discussion thread from approximately 2015 [Ref 17] references 2-FEA as newly available from Swedish vendors, placing its market emergence no later than ~2015. The positional isomer 3-FEA was first characterized in seized material in 2018 (Yanini et al. 2018 [Ref 26]), suggesting the broader fluoroethamphetamine class was established on the NPS market by the mid-2010s. ### Regulatory History - **Germany:** Controlled under the NpSG (Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz / New Psychoactive Substances Act) effective November 26, 2016. Production, import for placement on market, administration to others, and trading are punishable; possession is illegal but not penalized. - **United Kingdom:** Covered by the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA 2016), which prohibits production, supply, importation, and exportation of psychoactive substances not otherwise exempted. Given its amphetamine-type structure, 2-FEA may additionally be classified as a Class A drug under the analogue provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Al-Banaa et al. 2020 [Ref 28] provides context on PSA 2016 impact). - **United States:** No specific federal scheduling of 2-FEA has been found. As a structural amphetamine analog, it may be subject to Schedule II treatment under the Federal Analogue Act (21 U.S.C. § 813) if intended for human consumption. Amphetamine itself is Schedule II. - **Netherlands:** Web sources suggest 2-FEA is or was available legally in the Netherlands but subject to upcoming or recent NPS legislation (web-retrieved; unverified with primary legal source). - **Canada:** The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Schedule covers amphetamines and analogs; 2-FEA would likely be treated accordingly (not substance-specifically scheduled; no primary source confirmed). - **Australia:** No specific scheduling found. The TGA Poisons Standard Schedule 9 covers analogues; 2-FEA likely falls under this. **⚠ FLAG — Legal status:** No jurisdiction has been confirmed to have specifically and explicitly scheduled 2-FEA by name based on sources found in this research. All legal status information is either analogue-provision inference or web-retrieved, not confirmed via government database lookup or peer-reviewed legal analysis. This section requires editorial verification. --- ## Subjective Effects No controlled human studies of 2-FEA have been conducted. All subjective effect information comes from community-sourced user reports and structural analog inference. ### Community-Reported Profile (user-report only) From PsychonautWiki [Ref 16] and Bluelight [Ref 17]: - **Stimulation and focus:** Described as classically stimulant in character, consistent with dopamine/norepinephrine release - **Euphoria:** Reported; cognitive and physical - **Entactogenic/serotonergic qualities:** PsychonautWiki classifies it as an entactogen in addition to stimulant; Bluelight users describe it as less "warm" than 3-FEA but with some social/empathic effects - **Paradoxical combination:** Web sources report a paradoxical combination of sedating and stimulating effects, with serotonin release potentially accounting for the sedating component - **Comparison to amphetamine:** Users describe it as "a lot like regular Amphetamine" [Ref 17] - **Comparison to 2-FMA:** TripSit characterizes 2-FEA as closely related to 2-FMA and "presumably slightly less potent" [Ref 17] - **Anxiety/paranoia:** Reported at high doses or after extended use/redosing - **After-effects:** 1–3 hours of residual stimulation/fatigue described ### Analog-Supported Effect Profile Based on 4-FA human trial data (de Sousa Fernandes Perna et al. 2018 [Ref 11]; Kuypers et al. 2018 [Ref 21]): - Peak mood effects (vigor, friendliness, elation, arousal, positive mood) occur within the first 1–2 hours post-dose - Attention and motor performance improvements during acute phase - Negative affect (comedown) during the subacute phase (hours 5+) - Drug liking and wanting elevated — indicative of abuse liability ### Dose Data (Insufflated — PsychonautWiki [Ref 16] — user-report only) | Tier | Dose | |---|---| | Threshold | 15 mg | | Light | 20–30 mg | | Common | 30–40 mg | | Strong | 40–60 mg | | Heavy | 60+ mg | **Note on seed data consistency:** The dose data in the brief matches PsychonautWiki exactly. These figures have not been validated in any controlled study and are based on community consensus. ### Duration Data (Insufflated — PsychonautWiki [Ref 16] — user-report only) | Phase | Duration | |---|---| | Onset | 5–15 min | | Come up | 5–10 min | | Peak | 30–60 min | | Offset | 30–60 min | | After-effects | 1–3 hours | | Total | 1–2.5 hours | **Note on oral route:** Some web sources describe oral administration with a substantially longer total duration (4–6 hours) and later onset (30–60 min). The seed database only includes insufflated data. The generation agent should note that oral ROA data exists but is not captured in the current DB. --- ## Safety & Toxicity ### Overall Assessment No published LD50 data, no published case reports of 2-FEA-specific overdose, and no controlled safety studies exist for 2-FEA. The exact toxic dosage is unknown (confirmed in seed data). All safety data is derived from structurally related fluorinated amphetamines. ### Class-Level Risk Framework (analog inference) **Cardiovascular toxicity** is the primary acute safety concern for fluorinated amphetamines: - 4-FA produces exaggerated blood pressure effects compared to MDMA and amphetamine, with documented cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage in ED presentations (Gresnigt et al. 2022 [Ref 19]) - The 4-FA phase 1 human study cancelled the 150 mg arm after interim safety review due to severe blood pressure elevation (de Sousa Fernandes Perna et al. 2018 [Ref 11]) - Methamphetamine and amphetamine-type stimulants cause hypertension, accelerated atherosclerosis, vasospasm-induced acute coronary syndromes, sudden cardiac death, and dilated cardiomyopathy via excessive catecholamine release → vasoconstriction → tachycardia → endothelial dysfunction (Annawald et al. 2024 [Ref 32]) **Hyperthermia and BBB breakdown:** - Stimulant-induced hyperthermia can progress to blood-brain barrier leakage → vasogenic edema → death, potentiated in warm environments and by physical exertion (Kiyatkin & Sharma 2019 [Ref 15]) - Docherty & Alsufyani 2021 [Ref 7]: MDMA-like stimulants cause life-threatening hyperthermia in rave/club environments; amphetamine-like NPS share cardiovascular sympathomimetic toxicity **Neurotoxicity:** - Para-halogenation of amphetamine increases mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis in neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y) compared to non-halogenated analogs (Zhou et al. 2020 [Ref 20]). Whether this is relevant to ortho-fluorination (as in 2-FEA) is unknown. **Abuse liability / locomotor:** - 2-FA (the closest structural analog without the N-ethyl group) shows full substitution for methamphetamine in discriminative stimulus tests in rodents and locomotor effects comparable to methamphetamine; 2-FMA and other fluorinated analogs produce methamphetamine-like profiles (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 10]) - 4-FA increases drug liking and wanting in humans, contributing to abuse liability (Kuypers et al. 2018 [Ref 21]) **Overdose clinical features (class-level; Spiller et al. 2013 [Ref 23]):** - Mydriasis, tremor, agitation, hyperreflexia, combative behavior, confusion, hallucinations, delirium, anxiety, paranoia, movement disorders, seizures - Management: benzodiazepines first-line for sympathomimetic syndrome; antipsychotics (ziprasidone, haloperidol) or dexmedetomidine as second-line ### Psychological Risks - Amphetamine-class stimulants carry documented risks of anxiety, paranoia, psychosis, and mood disorders with chronic use - Dependence formation: the seed data notes "moderately addictive with a high potential for abuse" — consistent with class-level data but unverified for 2-FEA specifically - Drug liking and wanting (precursors to abuse) are elevated by fluoroamphetamines (Kuypers et al. 2018 [Ref 21]) --- ## Harm Reduction ### General Principles (class-level; no 2-FEA-specific protocols published) 1. **Start low:** No human safety data exists for 2-FEA. The absence of controlled studies means individual variability in toxicity threshold is entirely unknown. 2. **Avoid warm/hot environments:** Stimulant-induced hyperthermia is potentiated by ambient temperature (Kiyatkin & Sharma 2019 [Ref 15]); avoid raves, saunas, or extended physical exertion while dosing. 3. **Cardiovascular monitoring:** Fluorinated amphetamines produce severe and sustained blood pressure elevation (de Sousa Fernandes Perna et al. 2018 [Ref 11]; Gresnigt et al. 2022 [Ref 19]). Individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions face elevated risk. 4. **Avoid redosing:** Community reports note compulsive redosing; extended sessions increase cardiovascular and neurotoxicity risk. 5. **Drug interactions — critically avoid:** See Interactions section. Tramadol, MDMA, and cocaine combinations are all classified as lethal risk. 6. **Hydration:** Stimulants cause dehydration; controlled water intake is recommended, but overhydration (hyponatremia) is also a risk in hot environments. 7. **Testing:** Reagent tests (Marquis, Mecke, Simon's) can distinguish phenethylamines from other classes but cannot confirm specific compound identity. LC-MS/MS is required for definitive confirmation. Some RC vendors sell pellets containing mixed isomers (2/3-FEA), meaning the purchased substance may not be pure 2-FEA. 8. **Emergency response:** Standard sympathomimetic overdose protocol — benzodiazepines for agitation, cooling for hyperthermia, cardiac monitoring (Spiller et al. 2013 [Ref 23]). Emergency services should be alerted that the substance is a stimulant; report all co-administered drugs. --- ## Tolerance & Dependence ### Tolerance No 2-FEA-specific data published. Seed data states: "Develops with prolonged and repeated use; tolerance half-life ~5 days; full reset ~1.5 weeks; cross-tolerance: dopamine, stimulant class." These values are consistent with general stimulant tolerance dynamics but are not supported by any published primary source for 2-FEA specifically. Cross-tolerance with dopamine-releasing stimulants (amphetamine, methamphetamine, other fluoroamphetamines) is expected based on shared DAT/NET release mechanisms. **⚠ FLAG:** Tolerance half-life (5 days) and full reset (1.5 weeks) not verified against any published source. These should be flagged as community-consensus values. ### Dependence Seed data: Physical dependence moderate; psychological dependence moderate; moderately addictive with high abuse potential. Analog data support: - Fluorinated amphetamines produce drug liking and wanting comparable to classical stimulants (Kuypers et al. 2018 [Ref 21]) - 2-FA shows full methamphetamine-like abuse potential in rodent discriminative stimulus studies (Anchondo et al. 2025 [Ref 10]) - Dopamine-releasing agents have higher abuse liability than serotonin-releasing agents (Rothman & Baumann 2006 [Ref 29]) - The primarily catecholaminergic profile of 2-FEA predicts high abuse liability (Simmler & Liechti 2018 [Ref 3]) **⚠ FLAG:** Physical dependence classified as "moderate" in seed data. Classical amphetamines typically produce moderate-to-strong psychological dependence and variable physical dependence. Without 2-FEA-specific data, this rating is speculative. ### Withdrawal No 2-FEA-specific withdrawal data. Class-level: amphetamine discontinuation typically produces fatigue, hypersomnia, depressed mood, increased appetite, and anhedonia. Duration and severity are dose- and frequency-dependent. --- ## Interactions The seed data lists the following interactions. Below is the mechanistic analysis for each. ### Tramadol — Listed as Lethal ⚠ **Mechanism (published; Baldo 2018 [Ref 33]; Sheikholeslami et al. 2021 [Ref 13]):** - Tramadol inhibits SERT and NET, causing serotonin accumulation in the synapse - 2-FEA (as a monoamine releaser) increases serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine in the synapse via reverse transport - Combined serotonergic excess from both mechanisms creates conditions for serotonin toxicity syndrome (hyperthermia, rigidity, myoclonus, seizures → death) - Additionally, tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4; if 2-FEA or co-administered MDMA inhibits CYP2D6, tramadol levels may rise unpredictably - This interaction is pharmacodynamic (additive serotonin toxicity) + potentially pharmacokinetic (CYP inhibition) - **Assessment: Confirmed lethal class-level mechanism; label as lethal is appropriate** ### MDMA — Listed as Lethal ⚠ **Mechanism (published; de la Torre et al. 2004 [Ref 34]; Papaseit et al. 2020 [Ref 14]; Pilgrim et al. 2012 [Ref 24]):** - MDMA is a potent releaser of serotonin (primarily), dopamine, and norepinephrine - Combined with 2-FEA (which releases dopamine, norepinephrine, and possibly serotonin), both substances compete for the same monoamine transporters in reverse-transport mode - The combination produces additive/synergistic monoamine excess → serotonin syndrome risk, extreme hyperthermia, cardiovascular collapse - MDMA also inhibits CYP2D6 via mechanism-based inhibition, which may reduce metabolism of co-administered drugs including 2-FEA - Pilgrim et al. 2012 [Ref 24] documents fatal serotonin toxicity from MDMA+MAOI combinations with identical clinical picture - **Assessment: Confirmed lethal class-level mechanism; label as lethal is appropriate** ### Cocaine — Listed as Lethal ⚠ **Mechanism (published; Docherty & Alsufyani 2021 [Ref 7]):** - Cocaine is a monoamine reuptake inhibitor (blocks DAT, NET, SERT) - 2-FEA is a monoamine releaser (reverse-transports DA and NE out via DAT and NET) - Combination of a DAT/NET blocker with a DAT/NET releaser creates massive, unsustainable increases in extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine - Consequences include severe tachycardia, hypertension, vasoconstriction, hyperthermia, and potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmia or myocardial infarction - Additionally, cardiovascular synergy: both substances produce sympathomimetic effects that are additive - **Assessment: Plausible lethal class-level mechanism; label as lethal is consistent with stimulant+stimulant harm reduction guidance. No 2-FEA+cocaine-specific case reports found.** ### Alcohol — Listed as Unknown ⚠ **Mechanism:** Ethanol and amphetamine-type stimulants interact in complex ways: ethanol may increase plasma amphetamine concentrations by presystemic (first-pass) effects (Schoretsanitis et al. 2019 [Ref n/a]), blunt subjective intoxication leading to overconsumption, and increase cardiovascular strain. The combination is considered dangerous but not uniformly lethal in the literature. Specific interaction data for 2-FEA does not exist. - **Assessment: Classification as "unknown" is appropriate given absence of 2-FEA-specific data. The interaction should be listed as potentially dangerous, not lethal.** ### Additional Interaction Considerations (not in seed data) - **MAO inhibitors (MAOIs):** Combination of a monoamine releasing agent with any MAOI is potentially lethal via hypertensive crisis and/or serotonin syndrome. Amphetamine derivatives show MAO inhibitory activity themselves at higher concentrations (Reyes-Parada et al. 2019 [Ref 12]). - **Antidepressants (SSRIs, SNRIs):** Pharmacodynamic interaction via additive serotonin load; increased serotonin syndrome risk (Inan et al. 2020 [Ref 22]). - **CYP2D6 inhibitors:** May raise 2-FEA blood levels by reducing N-deethylation, as CYP2D6 is implicated in amphetamine metabolism. --- ## Legal Status | Jurisdiction | Status | Mechanism | Confidence | |---|---|---|---| | United Kingdom | Illegal (production/supply) | Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 [Ref 28]; likely also MDA 1971 analogue clause (Class A) | High (PSA 2016 is broad) | | Germany | Controlled — NpSG | New Psychoactive Substances Act, effective 2016-11-26 | High (web-retrieved, specific to amphetamine-type NPS) | | United States | Potentially Schedule II | Federal Analogue Act (21 U.S.C. §813) if intended for human consumption | Moderate (no substance-specific scheduling found) | | Netherlands | Uncertain (possibly covered by NPS law) | NPS legislation; web-retrieved | Low | | Canada | Likely covered | CDSA analogue provisions | Low (no substance-specific scheduling found) | | Australia | Likely Schedule 9 | TGA Poisons Standard NPS analogue provisions | Low | | Sweden | Likely covered | Narcotics Act analogue provisions | Moderate (Swedish vendors historically sold 2-FEA; regulatory response expected) | **⚠ FLAG:** No primary government legal source (official schedule, statutory instrument, or government database entry) was retrieved that names 2-FEA specifically in any jurisdiction. All legal status information is inferred from analogue provisions. Generation agent should present this with appropriate uncertainty. --- ## Clinical Trials No clinical trials involving 2-FEA were found on ClinicalTrials.gov or in any published literature. No trials are anticipated for this compound given its NPS legal status in most jurisdictions. --- ## Community Feedback Analysis **No community feedback was submitted** (Part A2 of the brief was empty). --- ## Gaps & Flags The following items require editorial attention before article publication: ### Safety-Critical Gaps 1. **⚠ No published LD50 or toxic dose data** for 2-FEA in any species. Exact toxic dosage is unknown. All safety thresholds are derived from analog inference. 2. **⚠ No published case reports** of 2-FEA overdose, adverse events, or death. Cannot confirm whether lethal interaction classifications (tramadol, MDMA, cocaine) are based on documented 2-FEA cases or class-level inference — they appear to be class-level. 3. **⚠ Tolerance and dependence values** (half-life 5 days, full reset 1.5 weeks, physical/psychological moderate) in seed data are unverified against any published primary source. ### Pharmacological Gaps 4. **⚠ No binding affinity data** (Ki/EC50/IC50) at DAT, NET, SERT, or any other target for 2-FEA. All receptor pharmacology is structural analog inference. 5. **⚠ Serotonin releasing potential uncertain:** The seed data classifies 2-FEA as DA+NE releasing only. However, N-ethyl substitution SAR data (Fitzgerald et al. 2024 [Ref 6]) suggests augmented SERT activity relative to N-methyl analogs. PsychonautWiki classifies 2-FEA as an entactogen (implying serotonin involvement). This is a meaningful discrepancy — the generation agent should present serotonin release as uncertain/possible rather than confirmed or denied. 6. **⚠ No published pharmacokinetic data** (half-life, Tmax, bioavailability, volume of distribution) for 2-FEA. Metabolic pathways are predicted by analogy to 2-FMA. 7. **⚠ No enantiomeric potency data** for 2-FEA. The RC market product is expected to be racemic. ### Chemical Data Gaps 8. **⚠ SMILES unverified:** The SMILES string (CCNC(C)Cc1ccccc1F) was structurally derived, not retrieved by API. Verify against PubChem CID 20027466 before publishing. 9. **⚠ No SMILES in PubChem API response:** The PubChem tool call did not return a SMILES string — this should be retrieved via PubChem REST API directly. ### Legal Status Gaps 10. **⚠ No primary legal sources verified** for 2-FEA scheduling in any jurisdiction. Legal status section is analog-provision inference throughout. ### Structural Data Points Absent from Seed 11. The seed data lacks: Molecular formula (C11H16FN), Molecular weight (181.25 g/mol), InChIKey (NIWYLNFSJJLYHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N), and CAS number (3871-89-4 for HCl salt). These are now confirmed and should be added to the DB record. ### Oral Route Gap 12. The seed database only captures insufflated dosing and duration. Some sources describe 2-FEA oral administration with substantially different duration (4–6 hours total, 30–60 min onset). If oral use is common, the DB should include oral dose/duration data. --- ## Research Summary 2-FEA (2-Fluoroethamphetamine) is an emerging research chemical stimulant with very limited published literature. It is a structural substituted amphetamine — the N-ethyl homolog of 2-FA and N-ethyl analog of 2-FMA — with a fluorine atom at the ortho-position of the phenyl ring. No substance-specific pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, toxicological, or clinical studies have been published. Chemical identity has been confirmed via PubChem (CID 20027466). The compound appeared on RC markets approximately 2014–2016. All pharmacological characterization is based on structural analog inference from related fluorinated amphetamines and N-substituted phenethylamines. The most relevant analog data comes from: - **Anchondo et al. 2025** [Ref 10]: 2-FA shows methamphetamine-comparable locomotor and discriminative stimulus effects in rodents, with potential adverse effects including heart failure, cerebral hemorrhage, and death. - **de Sousa Fernandes Perna et al. 2018** [Ref 11]: 4-FA human trial showing severe BP elevation warranting cancellation of the 150 mg arm; drug liking/wanting elevated (Kuypers et al. 2018 [Ref 21]). - **Fitzgerald et al. 2024** [Ref 6]: N-ethyl substitution augments SERT relative potency and modifies DAT/NET releasing efficacy. - **Ishii et al. 2023** [Ref 27]: 2-FMA metabolic pathways (N-deethylation to 2-FA, N-hydroxylation, beta-hydroxylation) predicted to apply to 2-FEA.