2-FA
2-fluoroamphetamine
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 5 mg | 5 mg | low |
| Low | 15–30 mg | 15–30 mg | low |
| Common | 30–50 mg | 30–50 mg | low |
| Strong | 50–60 mg | 50–60 mg | low |
| Heavy | 60+ mg | 60+ mg | low |
| Editorial | Values from existing DB / community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No published human dosing study exists. Dose ranges are consistent with amphetamine class — common range (30-50 mg) overlaps with therapeutic racemic amphetamine doses. Work-notes confirm these values with low confidence. All dose ranges are safety-critical and unverified against published clinical data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningValues from existing DB / community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No published human dosing study exists. Dose ranges are consistent with amphetamine class — common range (30-50 mg) overlaps with therapeutic racemic amphetamine doses. Work-notes confirm these values with low confidence. All dose ranges are safety-critical and unverified against published clinical data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offsettrace | 1–1.5 hours | 1–1.5 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Onsettrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Consistent with amphetamine class oral onset. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Consistent with amphetamine class oral onset. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 15–30 minutes | 15–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. No published data. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 1–2 hours | 1–2 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. Notably shorter than 4-FA or amphetamine peak duration — no pharmacokinetic explanation published. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. Notably shorter than 4-FA or amphetamine peak duration — no pharmacokinetic explanation published. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Totaltrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Community consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. Total subjective duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine (4-6 hours). No PK explanation published. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity consensus (PsychonautWiki). Matches existing DB seed data. Total subjective duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine (4-6 hours). No PK explanation published. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| After effectstrace | 2–6 hours | 2–6 hours | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify 2-6 hours aftereffects from class inference — post-stimulant fatigue, dysphoria. Not specifically documented for 2-FA. Inferred from amphetamine class recovery pattern. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify 2-6 hours aftereffects from class inference — post-stimulant fatigue, dysphoria. Not specifically documented for 2-FA. Inferred from amphetamine class recovery pattern. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | moderate | moderate | low |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular, central nervous system, hepatic | cardiovascular, central nervous system, hepatic | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes: acute=moderate, chronic=moderate (no data, inferred from amphetamine class). Evidence class is class extrapolation from amphetamine + 1 fatal polydrug case report + 3 DUID cases. Per evidence discount rule, class-extrapolated evidence → confidence low. Reference compound: amphetamine. Hepatic listed as affected organ per work-notes flag on para-halogenation hepatotoxicity data gap, though ortho-halogenation untested. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes: acute=moderate, chronic=moderate (no data, inferred from amphetamine class). Evidence class is class extrapolation from amphetamine + 1 fatal polydrug case report + 3 DUID cases. Per evidence discount rule, class-extrapolated evidence → confidence low. Reference compound: amphetamine. Hepatic listed as affected organ per work-notes flag on para-halogenation hepatotoxicity data gap, though ortho-halogenation untested. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | moderate | moderate | low |
| Psychological | moderate | moderate | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | high | high | low |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes: physical=moderate, psychological=moderate, compulsive redosing=moderate-to-high (rounded to high given short duration + meth-like interoception), dose escalation=moderate. All values are community consensus supported by one rodent discriminative stimulus study (Anchondo 2025). No human dependence data. Reference compound: amphetamine. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes: physical=moderate, psychological=moderate, compulsive redosing=moderate-to-high (rounded to high given short duration + meth-like interoception), dose escalation=moderate. All values are community consensus supported by one rodent discriminative stimulus study (Anchondo 2025). No human dependence data. Reference compound: amphetamine. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | mild | mild | low |
| Symptoms | Fatigue, Hypersomnia, Increased appetite, Dysphoria, Psychomotor retardation | Fatigue, Hypersomnia, Increased appetite, Dysphoria, Psychomotor retardation | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | low |
| Editorial | Class inference from amphetamine withdrawal. Work-notes specify mild-to-moderate severity (conservatively coded as mild), onset 12-24 hours, duration 3-7 days. No 2-FA-specific withdrawal data exist. Amphetamine withdrawal is not medically dangerous but can be functionally debilitating. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from amphetamine withdrawal. Work-notes specify mild-to-moderate severity (conservatively coded as mild), onset 12-24 hours, duration 3-7 days. No 2-FA-specific withdrawal data exist. Amphetamine withdrawal is not medically dangerous but can be functionally debilitating. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | 5 days | 5 days | low |
| Full Reset | 5.5 days | 5.5 days | low |
| Cross-tolerances | amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, dopaminergic stimulants | amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, cocaine, dopaminergic stimulants | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes: buildup=moderate, half-life=5 days, full reset=5.5 days. All values from community consensus (TripSit/PsychonautWiki), not published 2-FA studies. Cross-tolerances expanded from seed data 'dopamine, stimulant' to specific compound names per work-notes. Reference compound: amphetamine. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes: buildup=moderate, half-life=5 days, full reset=5.5 days. All values from community consensus (TripSit/PsychonautWiki), not published 2-FA studies. Cross-tolerances expanded from seed data 'dopamine, stimulant' to specific compound names per work-notes. Reference compound: amphetamine. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| metabolic Hyperthyroidismtrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication inherited from amphetamine. Work-notes list moderate confidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication inherited from amphetamine. Work-notes list moderate confidence. | |||
| other Concurrent MAOI usetrace | absolute | absolute | high |
| Editorial | Class-level absolute contraindication for all amphetamine-type monoamine releasing agents. Mechanism universally established; no substance-specific override possible. Work-notes list this as high confidence at class level. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level absolute contraindication for all amphetamine-type monoamine releasing agents. Mechanism universally established; no substance-specific override possible. Work-notes list this as high confidence at class level. | |||
| cardiovascular Severe cardiovascular diseasetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level absolute contraindication inherited from amphetamine. Sympathomimetic cardiovascular toxidrome is the primary acute risk identified in the article prose and research output. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level absolute contraindication inherited from amphetamine. Sympathomimetic cardiovascular toxidrome is the primary acute risk identified in the article prose and research output. | |||
| other Concurrent tramadol usetrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Work-notes list this as absolute contraindication with moderate confidence. Lethal designation from community interaction databases (TripSit). Pharmacological mechanism is sound but no 2-FA-specific case data exist. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list this as absolute contraindication with moderate confidence. Lethal designation from community interaction databases (TripSit). Pharmacological mechanism is sound but no 2-FA-specific case data exist. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication from amphetamine. Work-notes list moderate confidence. Seizure threshold reduction is included in the seed effect profile. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication from amphetamine. Work-notes list moderate confidence. Seizure threshold reduction is included in the seed effect profile. | |||
| psychiatric Anxiety disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication. Work-notes list moderate confidence. Consistent with article prose describing anxiety predominance at strong/heavy doses. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication. Work-notes list moderate confidence. Consistent with article prose describing anxiety predominance at strong/heavy doses. | |||
| psychiatric Psychotic spectrum conditionstrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication with high confidence at the class level. Work-notes rate this as well-established. Downgraded to medium for 2-FA specifically due to absence of substance-specific data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication with high confidence at the class level. Work-notes rate this as well-established. Downgraded to medium for 2-FA specifically due to absence of substance-specific data. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancytrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level relative contraindication. Work-notes list moderate confidence. No 2-FA-specific reproductive data; entirely inferred from amphetamine class. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level relative contraindication. Work-notes list moderate confidence. No 2-FA-specific reproductive data; entirely inferred from amphetamine class. | |||
| hepatic Hepatic impairmenttrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes list low confidence — entirely inferred from predicted metabolic pathway and para-isomer hepatotoxicity data. No 2-FA-specific hepatic data exist. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes list low confidence — entirely inferred from predicted metabolic pathway and para-isomer hepatotoxicity data. No 2-FA-specific hepatic data exist. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 600–1800 sec(i=0.15) | 600–1800 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Come uptrace | 900–1800 sec(i=0.50) | 900–1800 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Peaktrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=1.00) | 3600–7200 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 3600–5400 sec(i=0.40) | 3600–5400 sec(i=0.40) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.15) | 7200–21600 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases from community consensus data (PsychonautWiki). No published pharmacokinetic study for 2-FA. Work-notes specify onset (0-15 min), come_up (15-30 min), peak (30-120 min), offset (120-180 min), afterglow (180-360 min). Duration notably shorter than expected from structural analogy with amphetamine — no PK explanation published. Afterglow described as recovery period, not positive residual effects. Evidence basis: community_consensus_large | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At approximately 5 mg oral, 2-FA produces barely perceptible stimulation — a subtle increase in wakefulness and alertness without clear cognitive enhancement or mood elevation. Most users report minimal subjective change at this level, with effects easily attributable to placebo or expectation. Physical effects are negligible. No appreciable cardiovascular activation, appetite suppression, or pupil dilation is expected at threshold doses. The experience is sub-functional and primarily useful for assessing individual sensitivity before titrating upward. Duration at threshold is brief, typically resolving within 1–2 hours. Sleep disruption is unlikely at this dose level.
Work-notes outline: 'Barely perceptible stimulation at 5 mg oral.' All values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No published human dosing study. Threshold consistent with amphetamine class.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline: 'Barely perceptible stimulation at 5 mg oral.' All values from community consensus (PsychonautWiki). No published human dosing study. Threshold consistent with amphetamine class.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At 15–30 mg oral, 2-FA produces mild functional stimulation. Wakefulness becomes noticeable, with subtle focus enhancement and a slight sharpening of attention. Thought acceleration is minimal. Cognitive euphoria is absent or barely perceptible — the experience is utilitarian rather than hedonic. Physical effects remain mild. Slight appetite suppression may emerge. Cardiovascular changes (heart rate, blood pressure) are minimal at this range. Pupil dilation is possible but subtle. Side effects such as bruxism, muscle tension, or excessive sweating are uncommon at light doses. Comparable in character to a low therapeutic dose of amphetamine. Duration is 2–3 hours. Sleep disruption is unlikely if taken early in the day.
Work-notes outline: 'Mild functional stimulation at 15-30 mg oral.' Community consensus values from PsychonautWiki. No published human dosing data. Consistent with amphetamine class dose-response.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline: 'Mild functional stimulation at 15-30 mg oral.' Community consensus values from PsychonautWiki. No published human dosing data. Consistent with amphetamine class dose-response.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At 30–50 mg oral, 2-FA produces its characteristic stimulant profile. Focus enhancement, motivation enhancement, and thought acceleration are clearly present. Wakefulness is pronounced. Cognitive euphoria is possible but described as modest — a mild sense of clarity and drive rather than overt pleasure. The experience is consistently described as functional rather than recreational. Appetite suppression is moderate. Heart rate elevation becomes noticeable. Mild excessive sweating, dehydration sensation, and pupil dilation are common. Bruxism and muscle tension may appear but are less prominent than with more serotonergic stimulants like 4-FA. This is the dose range most commonly reported for productive use. Total duration is 2–4 hours, with the short duration creating potential temptation to redose. Insomnia is possible if taken in the afternoon or evening.
Work-notes outline: 'Clear stimulant profile at 30-50 mg oral; pronounced focus enhancement, motivation, thought acceleration.' Community consensus dose range. No published clinical data. Functional character noted consistently in user reports.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline: 'Clear stimulant profile at 30-50 mg oral; pronounced focus enhancement, motivation, thought acceleration.' Community consensus dose range. No published clinical data. Functional character noted consistently in user reports.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
At 50–60 mg oral, 2-FA shifts toward side-effect dominance. Stimulation is pronounced but the desirable cognitive effects — focus enhancement, thought organization — do not scale proportionally with dose. Anxiety and restlessness become prominent. Cognitive euphoria, if present at common doses, does not meaningfully increase. Physical effects intensify: excessive sweating, muscle tension, insomnia, vasoconstriction, and elevated heart rate are common. Temperature dysregulation and headache may emerge. Appetite suppression is strong. The cardiovascular stress at this tier warrants caution in anyone with borderline cardiovascular health. Diminishing returns on desirable effects with increasing adverse effects define this tier. The compulsive redosing urge may be stronger due to the short duration, but escalating dose produces more side effects rather than greater reward.
Work-notes outline: 'Pronounced stimulation at 50-60 mg oral with shift toward side-effect dominance.' Community consensus. Article prose confirms anxiety and overstimulation predominate at higher ranges. No published data at these doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline: 'Pronounced stimulation at 50-60 mg oral with shift toward side-effect dominance.' Community consensus. Article prose confirms anxiety and overstimulation predominate at higher ranges. No published data at these doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
Doses above 60 mg oral produce strong sympathomimetic activation with a high adverse-effect burden. Marked anxiety, paranoia potential, pronounced insomnia, vasoconstriction, and temperature dysregulation are expected. Cardiovascular stress is significant — tachycardia and hypertension may reach clinically concerning levels. Risk of stimulant psychosis increases substantially at this tier, particularly with prolonged use, repeated dosing, or concurrent sleep deprivation. Delusions and tactile hallucinations become possible under extreme conditions. The compulsive redosing urge may lead to cumulative dose escalation that compounds all risks. No published safety data exist at these doses. The exact toxic threshold is unknown. Heavy doses of 2-FA represent an uncharacterized risk space where acute cardiovascular emergencies and psychotic episodes become plausible outcomes.
Work-notes outline: 'Doses above 60 mg oral produce strong sympathomimetic activation with high adverse-effect burden.' Community consensus only. Article prose explicitly states no published safety data at these doses. All risk assessments are class-level inference from amphetamine.
ReasoningReasoning
Work-notes outline: 'Doses above 60 mg oral produce strong sympathomimetic activation with high adverse-effect burden.' Community consensus only. Article prose explicitly states no published safety data at these doses. All risk assessments are class-level inference from amphetamine.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_large
History
+ 2-Fluoroamphetamine - Wikipedia (2024)
− 2-Fluoroamphetamine - Wikipedia (Legal status section) (2024)
publish Oct 2, 2026
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]weakIdentification and Quantitative Analysis of 2-Fluoromethamphetamine and Its Metabolites in Human UrineIshii A, Sato K, Kusakabe K, Kato N, Wada T · 2023 · Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- [2]weakIsomers of fluoroamphetamines detected in forensic cases in DenmarkJohansen SS, Hansen TM · 2012 · International Journal of Legal Medicine
- [3]moderateLocomotor and discriminative stimulus effects of fluorinated analogs of amphetamine and methamphetamine in mice and ratsAnchondo O, Shetty RA, Gatch MB · 2025 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [4]moderateAmphetamine and other weak bases act to promote reverse transport of dopamine in ventral midbrain neuronsSulzer D, Maidment NT, Rayport S · 1993 · Journal of Neurochemistrypubmed 8419534no claims checked
- [5]moderateInteraction of amphetamines and related compounds at the vesicular monoamine transporterPartilla JS, Dempsey AG, Nagpal AS, Blough BE, Baumann MH, Rothman RB · 2006 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 16835371no claims checked
- [6]strongPara-Halogenation Affects Monoamine Transporter Inhibition Properties and Hepatocellular Toxicity of Amphetamines and MethcathinonesLuethi D, Walter M, Zhou X, Rudin D, Krähenbuhl S, Liechti ME · 2019 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
- [7]moderateThe clinical toxicology of metamfetamineSchep LJ, Slaughter RJ, Beasley DM · 2010 · Clinical Toxicology
- [8]weakOrgan distribution of diclazepam, pyrazolam and 3-fluorophenmetrazineLehmann S, Sczyslo A, Froch-Cortis J, Rothschild MA, Thevis M, Andresen-Streichert H, Mercer-Chalmers-Bender K · 2019 · Forensic Science International
- [9]weak
- [10]weak
- [11]moderateIndirect chiral separation of 8 novel amphetamine derivatives as potential new psychoactive compounds by GC-MS and HPLCWeiss JA, Kadkhodaei K, Schmid MG · 2017 · Science & Justice
- [12]weak
- [13]moderateMass-Spectrometry-Based Identification of Synthetic Drug Isomers Using Infrared Ion SpectroscopyKranenburg RF, van Geenen FAMG, Berden G, Oomens J, Martens J · 2020 · Analytical Chemistry
- [14]weak
- [15]strongPharmacokinetic properties of 4-fluoroamphetamine in serum and oral fluid after oral ingestionToennes SW, Schneider D, Pogoda W, Paulke A, Wunder C, Theunissen EL, Kuypers KPC, de Sousa Fernandes Perna E, Ramaekers JG · 2019 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [16]strongRelationship between the serotonergic activity and reinforcing effects of a series of amphetamine analogsWee S, Anderson KG, Baumann MH, Rothman RB, Blough BE, Woolverton WL · 2005 · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 15677348no claims checked
- [17]moderateThe designer methcathinone analogs, mephedrone and methylone, are substrates for monoamine transporters in brain tissueBaumann MH, Ayestas MA, Partilla JS, et al. · 2012 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [18]moderate4-Fluoroamphetamine in the Netherlands: more than a one-night standLinsen F, Koning RP, van Laar M, Niesink RJ, Koeter MW, Brunt TM · 2015 · Addiction
- [19]weakPostoperative Serotonin Syndrome: A Case Report Highlighting Dexmedetomidine for Refractory SymptomsLopez BM, Shin W, Lopez MD · 2025 · Cureus
Claim Verification
No claim verification has run for this version.