1BP-LSD
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 50 µg | 50 µg | low |
| Low | 75–125 µg | 75–125 µg | low |
| Common | 150–200 µg | 150–200 µg | low |
| Strong | 225–350 µg | 225–350 µg | low |
| Heavy | 375+ µg | 375+ µg | low |
| Editorial | All dose ranges calculated from 1.88× MW ratio applied to established LSD dose ranges (threshold ~25 µg, light 25–75 µg, common 75–150 µg, strong 150–300 µg, heavy 300+ µg). Vendor blotter tabs (175 µg, 200 µg) corroborate the common range. No clinical validation exists — individual variation in boronate ester hydrolysis efficiency adds uncertainty beyond typical LSD dose-response variability. Reference compound: LSD (Holze et al. 2021). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll dose ranges calculated from 1.88× MW ratio applied to established LSD dose ranges (threshold ~25 µg, light 25–75 µg, common 75–150 µg, strong 150–300 µg, heavy 300+ µg). Vendor blotter tabs (175 µg, 200 µg) corroborate the common range. No clinical validation exists — individual variation in boronate ester hydrolysis efficiency adds uncertainty beyond typical LSD dose-response variability. Reference compound: LSD (Holze et al. 2021). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 60–120 minutes | 60–120 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Estimated from two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis prodrug conversion. Consumer sources cite ~2 hours for first effects. Substantially delayed vs LSD (30–60 min) or simpler prodrugs like 1P-LSD. Reference compound: LSD via prodrug model. | ||
ReasoningReasoningEstimated from two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis prodrug conversion. Consumer sources cite ~2 hours for first effects. Substantially delayed vs LSD (30–60 min) or simpler prodrugs like 1P-LSD. Reference compound: LSD via prodrug model. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Come uptrace | 60–120 minutes | 60–120 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Gradual come-up due to slow prodrug conversion releasing LSD incrementally. Inferred from LSD come-up duration with extension for two-step hydrolysis delay. Reference compound: LSD. | ||
ReasoningReasoningGradual come-up due to slow prodrug conversion releasing LSD incrementally. Inferred from LSD come-up duration with extension for two-step hydrolysis delay. Reference compound: LSD. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 3–5 hours | 3–5 hours | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from LSD peak duration at common doses (75–150 µg LSD-equivalent from 150–200 µg 1BP-LSD). LSD peak duration is dose-dependent; Holze et al. 2021 data supports 3–5 hour peak at these doses. Reference compound: LSD. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from LSD peak duration at common doses (75–150 µg LSD-equivalent from 150–200 µg 1BP-LSD). LSD peak duration is dose-dependent; Holze et al. 2021 data supports 3–5 hour peak at these doses. Reference compound: LSD. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Offsettrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from LSD offset duration. LSD's slow 5-HT2A receptor dissociation (EL2 lid mechanism, Wacker et al. 2017) produces gradual offset. Reference compound: LSD. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from LSD offset duration. LSD's slow 5-HT2A receptor dissociation (EL2 lid mechanism, Wacker et al. 2017) produces gradual offset. Reference compound: LSD. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Totaltrace | 10–14 hours | 10–14 hours | low |
| Editorial | LSD total subjective duration is 6.7–11 hours dose-dependent (Holze et al. 2021). The additional prodrug conversion delay (~1–2 hours beyond simpler prodrugs) extends total duration. Consumer sources estimate 10–14 hours. Reference compound: LSD + consumer estimate. | ||
ReasoningReasoningLSD total subjective duration is 6.7–11 hours dose-dependent (Holze et al. 2021). The additional prodrug conversion delay (~1–2 hours beyond simpler prodrugs) extends total duration. Consumer sources estimate 10–14 hours. Reference compound: LSD + consumer estimate. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| After effectstrace | 12–48 hours | 12–48 hours | low |
| Editorial | Residual effects per StatPearls LSD reference: 12–48 hours of aftereffects including mood changes, mild perceptual sensitivity, and possible insomnia. Reference compound: LSD. | ||
ReasoningReasoningResidual effects per StatPearls LSD reference: 12–48 hours of aftereffects including mood changes, mild perceptual sensitivity, and possible insomnia. Reference compound: LSD. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | low |
| Chronic | low | low | low |
| Organs Affected | cardiovascular | cardiovascular | low |
| Editorial | Work-notes specify acute=low, chronic=no data. LSD itself has negligible acute toxicity, but evidence discount rule (one level down from raw finding for class-extrapolated evidence) keeps this at 'low' rather than 'negligible'. Chronic set to 'low' rather than omitted — no chronic data exist for 1BP-LSD or its breakdown products (especially boron), but LSD class shows no chronic organ toxicity. All values inferred from LSD and the N1-acyl lysergamide prodrug series (Jurowski et al. 2026; StatPearls LSD toxicity review). Cardiovascular listed as organ affected due to moderate tachycardia/hypertension from LSD metabolite. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWork-notes specify acute=low, chronic=no data. LSD itself has negligible acute toxicity, but evidence discount rule (one level down from raw finding for class-extrapolated evidence) keeps this at 'low' rather than 'negligible'. Chronic set to 'low' rather than omitted — no chronic data exist for 1BP-LSD or its breakdown products (especially boron), but LSD class shows no chronic organ toxicity. All values inferred from LSD and the N1-acyl lysergamide prodrug series (Jurowski et al. 2026; StatPearls LSD toxicity review). Cardiovascular listed as organ affected due to moderate tachycardia/hypertension from LSD metabolite. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | none | none | medium |
| Psychological | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Compulsive Redosing | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Dose Escalation | negligible | negligible | medium |
| Editorial | Inferred from LSD dependence profile — high confidence for LSD itself, medium for prodrug extension to 1BP-LSD. LSD has well-established low addiction potential with no physical dependence, no withdrawal syndrome, and rapid tolerance as a biological rate-limiter (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022). | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from LSD dependence profile — high confidence for LSD itself, medium for prodrug extension to 1BP-LSD. LSD has well-established low addiction potential with no physical dependence, no withdrawal syndrome, and rapid tolerance as a biological rate-limiter (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | none | none | medium |
| Symptoms | — | — | medium |
| Fatal | No | No | medium |
| Medical Supervision | Not required | Not required | medium |
| Editorial | No withdrawal syndrome has been characterized for any LSD-class psychedelic. Physical dependence does not develop. Inferred from LSD via prodrug model. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo withdrawal syndrome has been characterized for any LSD-class psychedelic. Physical dependence does not develop. Inferred from LSD via prodrug model. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | rapid | rapid | medium |
| Half-life | 3.5 days | 3.5 days | medium |
| Full Reset | 10 days | 10 days | medium |
| Cross-tolerances | LSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1cP-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1S-LSD | LSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1cP-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1S-LSD | medium |
| Editorial | Tolerance mechanism well-characterized for LSD (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022): rapid 5-HT2A downregulation after single administration, 7–14 day full reset. Applied to 1BP-LSD via prodrug model — confidence medium because the mechanism is from the active metabolite LSD, not the prodrug itself. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance mechanism well-characterized for LSD (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022): rapid 5-HT2A downregulation after single administration, 7–14 day full reset. Applied to 1BP-LSD via prodrug model — confidence medium because the mechanism is from the active metabolite LSD, not the prodrug itself. Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| psychiatric Psychotic disorderstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD via prodrug model. Well-established contraindication across serotonergic psychedelic class, supported by clinical observation and survey data (Simonsson et al. 2023). | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD via prodrug model. Well-established contraindication across serotonergic psychedelic class, supported by clinical observation and survey data (Simonsson et al. 2023). | |||
| other Lithiumtrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD. Simonsson et al. 2023 survey data consistently identifies lithium as the highest-risk co-administered medication with serotonergic psychedelics. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD. Simonsson et al. 2023 survey data consistently identifies lithium as the highest-risk co-administered medication with serotonergic psychedelics. | |||
| other MAOIstrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD and serotonergic drug interaction principles. MAOIs potentiate all serotonergic psychedelics by inhibiting serotonin metabolism. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD and serotonergic drug interaction principles. MAOIs potentiate all serotonergic psychedelics by inhibiting serotonin metabolism. | |||
| psychiatric Bipolar disorder with psychotic featurestrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD and serotonergic psychedelic class. Lower confidence than psychotic disorders contraindication due to less direct evidence. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD and serotonergic psychedelic class. Lower confidence than psychotic disorders contraindication due to less direct evidence. | |||
| other Mood stabilizerstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD. Simonsson et al. 2023 survey data identified mood stabilizers as associated with increased difficulty during psychedelic experiences. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD. Simonsson et al. 2023 survey data identified mood stabilizers as associated with increased difficulty during psychedelic experiences. | |||
| cardiovascular Cardiovascular diseasetrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Class inference from LSD pharmacodynamic data. LSD's adrenergic and dopaminergic receptor engagement produces well-documented cardiovascular effects (Holze et al. 2021). | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass inference from LSD pharmacodynamic data. LSD's adrenergic and dopaminergic receptor engagement produces well-documented cardiovascular effects (Holze et al. 2021). | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding Pregnancy and breastfeedingtrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Absence of safety data for all lysergamides during pregnancy/breastfeeding. Standard precautionary contraindication. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAbsence of safety data for all lysergamides during pregnancy/breastfeeding. Standard precautionary contraindication. | |||
| neurological Seizure disorderstrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Theoretical concern based on psychedelic-induced cortical excitation mechanisms. No direct evidence for LSD or 1BP-LSD specifically, but precautionary inclusion is warranted. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTheoretical concern based on psychedelic-induced cortical excitation mechanisms. No direct evidence for LSD or 1BP-LSD specifically, but precautionary inclusion is warranted. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.10) | 3600–7200 sec(i=0.10) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Come uptrace | 3600–5400 sec(i=0.40) | 3600–5400 sec(i=0.40) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Peaktrace | 5400–10800 sec(i=1.00) | 5400–10800 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.50) | 7200–14400 sec(i=0.50) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 7200–50400 sec(i=0.15) | 7200–50400 sec(i=0.15) | low |
| Editorial | All timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). | ||
ReasoningReasoningAll timeline phases inferred from LSD duration data (Holze et al. 2021; StatPearls) with adjustments for the delayed onset (~2 hours) produced by 1BP-LSD's two-step boronate ester + amide hydrolysis. Consumer sources estimate ~2 hours for prodrug conversion. No controlled pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exist. Onset and come-up extended relative to direct LSD administration; peak and offset durations inferred from LSD at common doses (80–106 µg equivalent). Evidence basis: structural_analogy | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (~50 µg 1BP-LSD, delivering approximately 27 µg LSD-equivalent), effects are subtle and may be barely distinguishable from placebo. Perceptual sharpening may emerge — slightly brighter colors, mild enhancement of visual acuity — alongside faint body awareness and a possible gentle mood lift. No overt geometry or visual distortion occurs. Physical effects are minimal: slight restlessness or tingling sensations may be noticed. Appetite may be mildly reduced. The extended onset (~2 hours) means these subtle shifts emerge very gradually, making it difficult to identify the moment effects begin. The prodrug conversion uncertainty at this dose range is proportionally largest — individual variation in boronate ester hydrolysis could mean some users experience nothing at all while others notice clear sub-psychedelic effects.
All values inferred from LSD threshold dose (~25 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical data for 1BP-LSD. Prodrug conversion uncertainty adds additional variability at this dose range.
ReasoningReasoning
All values inferred from LSD threshold dose (~25 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical data for 1BP-LSD. Prodrug conversion uncertainty adds additional variability at this dose range.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
At light doses (~75–125 µg 1BP-LSD, delivering approximately 40–66 µg LSD-equivalent), mild perceptual enhancement becomes apparent. Color enhancement brightens the visual field, edges appear sharper, and subtle visual breathing may be noticed on textured surfaces. Thought acceleration and mild cognitive euphoria emerge alongside increased aesthetic appreciation and music enhancement. Physically, a mild body high develops with slight stimulation. Pupil dilation becomes noticeable. Mild appetite suppression and occasional yawning may occur. Social function remains largely preserved, though emotional sensitivity begins to increase. The extended onset of approximately 2 hours means effects build very gradually. Users should resist the urge to redose during this period — the full light-dose experience may not manifest until 3 hours after ingestion.
Inferred from LSD light dose range (~40–75 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. Vendor tab sizes (175–200 µg) suggest these doses fall below standard blotter strength. No clinical validation.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from LSD light dose range (~40–75 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. Vendor tab sizes (175–200 µg) suggest these doses fall below standard blotter strength. No clinical validation.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
At common doses (150–200 µg 1BP-LSD, delivering approximately 80–106 µg LSD-equivalent), the full psychedelic experience unfolds. Geometry becomes clearly visible — patterning on surfaces, symmetrical texture repetition, and visual drifting. Color enhancement and color alteration are prominent. Thought connectivity deepens, linking concepts across domains. Emotional enhancement intensifies both positive and challenging feelings. Music enhancement is often reported as a highlight of this dose range. Stimulation is noticeable — wakefulness and restlessness accompany the cognitive and perceptual shifts. Pupil dilation is marked. Appetite suppression is typical, and mild nausea may occur during the come-up. Vasoconstriction and muscle tension are possible but usually mild. Sleep is effectively impossible for 10+ hours after ingestion. This is the dose range targeted by vendor blotter tabs (175–200 µg). The ego remains intact but perspective is shifted. Introspection enhancement and novelty enhancement make familiar environments feel fresh. Time alteration — usually experienced as dilation — is common.
Inferred from LSD common dose range (~75–150 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. Vendor blotter sizes (175 µg, 200 µg) confirm this as the intended common range. No clinical validation for 1BP-LSD specifically.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from LSD common dose range (~75–150 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. Vendor blotter sizes (175 µg, 200 µg) confirm this as the intended common range. No clinical validation for 1BP-LSD specifically.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
At strong doses (~225–350 µg 1BP-LSD, delivering approximately 120–186 µg LSD-equivalent), visual phenomena intensify substantially. Complex geometry fills the visual field, environmental patterning becomes immersive, and visual morphing transforms objects and faces. Internal hallucinations may emerge with eyes closed. Ego dissolution becomes possible — a partial or complete loss of the ordinary sense of self. Thought loops and confusion may occur alongside deep introspection enhancement. Physical effects are more pronounced: marked stimulation, temperature dysregulation, muscle tension, and vasoconstriction. Motor control impairment makes movement feel uncoordinated. Nausea risk increases during the extended come-up. Emotional lability can swing rapidly between euphoria and anxiety. Temporal disorientation is significant — minutes may feel like hours. Decision-making is substantially impaired. This dose range demands a safe, controlled environment and an experienced, sober companion. The 2-hour onset creates elevated premature redosing risk.
Inferred from LSD strong dose range (~150–300 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical validation. Represents 1.5–2 standard vendor blotter tabs.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from LSD strong dose range (~150–300 µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical validation. Represents 1.5–2 standard vendor blotter tabs.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
At heavy doses (~375+ µg 1BP-LSD, delivering approximately 200+ µg LSD-equivalent), complete ego dissolution is likely. Boundary dissolution erases the perceived separation between self and environment. Internal hallucinations become vivid and immersive — entity contact, death-rebirth sequences, and transpersonal visions may occur. Reality testing is severely impaired; the distinction between hallucination and reality may be lost entirely. Physical intensity is high: pronounced stimulation, significant vasoconstriction, temperature dysregulation, trembling, and marked motor control impairment. Nausea and vomiting are more likely. Cardiovascular effects (tachycardia, hypertension) reach their maximum expression. Anxiety, paranoia, and panic risk are substantially elevated. Confusion and thought disorganization may become overwhelming. This dose range carries the highest risk of acute psychological distress and psychiatric emergency. The extended onset compounds danger — users who redose prematurely during the 2-hour wait may inadvertently reach this range. Professional harm reduction support and a safe environment are essential.
Inferred from LSD heavy dose range (~300+ µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical validation. Represents 2+ standard vendor blotter tabs. Maximum risk territory for an emerging, unstudied compound.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from LSD heavy dose range (~300+ µg) scaled by 1.88× MW ratio. No clinical validation. Represents 2+ standard vendor blotter tabs. Maximum risk territory for an emerging, unstudied compound.
Evidence basis: structural_analogy
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]weak
- [2]strongAcute dose-dependent effects of lysergic acid diethylamide in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy subjectsHolze F, Vizeli P, Müller F, Ley L, Duerig R, Varghese N, Zizzari P, Liechti ME · 2021 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [3]weak1S-LSD ban in Germany: regulatory history and NpSG 6th amendmentVarious (Chemical Collective, ModernMind, AcidBerlin) · 2025linkno claims checked
- [4]weak
- [5]weak
- [6]moderateTolerance and Cross-Tolerance among Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic 5-HT2A Receptor Agonists in Micede la Fuente Revenga M, Jaster AM, McGinn J, Silva G, Saha S, Gonzalez-Maeso J · 2022 · ACS Chemical Neuroscience
- [7]moderateAdverse effects of psychedelics: From anecdotes and misinformation to systematic scienceSchlag AK, Aday J, Salam I, Neill JC, Nutt DJ · 2022 · Journal of Psychopharmacology
- [8]moderatePharmacological and biotransformation studies of 1-acyl-substituted derivatives of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)Halberstadt AL, Chatha M, Klein AK, McCorvy JD, Meyer MR, Wagmann L, Stratford A, Brandt SD · 2020 · Neuropharmacology
- [9]moderatePharmacokinetics and subjective effects of 1P-LSD in humans after oral and intravenous administrationGrumann C, Henkel K, Brandt SD, Stratford A, Passie T, Auwaerter V · 2020 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [10]weak
- [11]moderateReturn of the lysergamides. Part I: Analytical and behavioural characterization of 1-propionyl-d-lysergic acid diethylamide (1P-LSD)Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Stratford A, Elliott SP, Hoang K, Wallach J, Halberstadt AL · 2016 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [12]moderateReturn of the lysergamides. Part V: Analytical and behavioural characterization of 1-butanoyl-d-lysergic acid diethylamide (1B-LSD)Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Stratford A, Elliott SP, et al. · 2019 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [13]moderateReturn of the lysergamides. Part VI: Analytical and behavioural characterization of 1-cyclopropanoyl-d-lysergic acid diethylamide (1CP-LSD)Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Stratford A, Odland AU et al. · 2020 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [14]moderateReturn of the lysergamides. Part VII: Analytical and behavioural characterization of 1-valeroyl-d-lysergic acid diethylamide (1V-LSD)Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Pulver B, Morton K, Stratford A, Dowling G, Halberstadt AL · 2022 · Drug Testing and Analysis
- [15]moderateIdentification of two lysergic acid diethylamide analogs, 1-(3-(trimethylsilyl) propionyl) lysergic acid diethylamide (1S-LSD) and 1-(2-thienoyl)-6-allyl-nor-d-lysergic acid diethylamide (1T-AL-LAD), in paper sheet products distributed on the internetTanaka R, Kawamura M, Ito M, Kikura-Hanajiri R · 2025 · Forensic Toxicology
- [16]weak
- [17]moderateCrystal Structure of an LSD-Bound Human Serotonin ReceptorWacker D, Wang S, McCorvy JD, Betz RM, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Levit A, Lansu K, Schools ZL, Che T, Nichols DE, Shoichet BK, Dror RO, Roth BL · 2017 · Celldoi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.0334 claims checked3 verified1 inconclusive
- [18]strongThe polypharmacology of psychedelics reveals multiple targets for potential therapeuticsJain MK, Gumpper RH, Slocum ST, Schmitz GP, Madsen JS, Tummino TA, Suomivuori CM, Huang XP, Shub L, DiBerto JF, Kim K, DeLeon C, Krumm BE, Fay JF, Keiser M, Hauser AS, Dror RO, Shoichet B, Gloriam DE, Nichols DE, Roth BL · 2025 · Neuron
- [19]strong5-HT2A receptors: Pharmacology and functional selectivityCummins BR, Billac GB, Nichols DE, Nichols CD · 2025 · Pharmacological Reviews
- [20]strongAbsolute Oral Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of LSD Base and Tartrate in a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover StudyArikci D, Holze F, Mueller L, Vizeli P, Rudin D, Luethi D, Hysek CM, Liechti ME · 2025 · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- [21]strongPharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Microdoses in Healthy ParticipantsHolze F, Liechti ME, Hutten NRPW, Mason NL, Dolder PC, Theunissen EL, Duthaler U, Feilding A, Ramaekers JG, Kuypers KPC · 2021 · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- [22]moderateCytochrome P450 enzymes contribute to the metabolism of LSD to nor-LSD and 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD: Implications for clinical LSD useLuethi D, Hoener MC, Krahenbuhl S, Liechti ME, Duthaler U · 2019 · Biochemical Pharmacology
- [23]strongGenetic influence of CYP2D6 on pharmacokinetics and acute subjective effects of LSD in a pooled analysisVizeli P, Straumann I, Holze F, Schmid Y, Dolder PC, Liechti ME · 2021 · Scientific Reports
- [24]strongModern Clinical Research on LSDLiechti ME · 2017 · Neuropsychopharmacology
- [25]moderateGenie in a blotter: A comparative study of LSD and LSD analogues' effects and user profileConey LD, Maier LJ, Ferris JA, Winstock AR, Barratt MJ · 2017 · Human Psychopharmacology
- [26]moderateThe toxicity of psychedelic LSD derivatives: in silico approach for 1cP-LSD and analogsJurowski K, Krosniak A, Kobylarz D, Fijalkowska O · 2026 · Archives of Toxicology
- [27]moderatePrevalence and associations of challenging, difficult or distressing experiences using classic psychedelicsSimonsson O, Hendricks PS, Chambers R, Osika W, Goldberg SB · 2023 · Journal of Affective Disorders
- [28]moderateHallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder: Etiology, Clinical Features, and Therapeutic PerspectivesMartinotti G, Santacroce R, Pettorruso M, Montemitro C, Spano MC, Lorusso M, Di Giannantonio M, Gallimberti L · 2018 · Brain Sciences
- [29]strongPharmacological Treatment of Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD): A Systematic ReviewNeven A, Blom JD · 2025 · Harvard Review of Psychiatrydoi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000439pubmed 409386893 claims checked1 verified1 partial1 inconclusive
- [30]strongAcute effects of MDMA and LSD co-administration in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participantsStraumann I, Ley L, Holze F et al. · 2023 · Neuropsychopharmacology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary4 claims3verified1partial
verifiedAs an N1-acyl lysergamide, 1BP-LSD is presumed to undergo two-step hydrolysis — boronate ester cleavage followed by amide bond scission — to liberate LSD as the sole pharmacologically active metabolite[8]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms that N1-acyl LSD derivatives (ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD) act as prodrugs via in vivo deacylation, producing high LSD plasma levels. The claim's 'boronate' specificity and 'presumed' qualifier are consistent with extrapolating this established prodrug model to 1BP-LSD.
High LSD plasma levels detected in rats after 1P-LSD/ALD-52 SC administration, confirming prodrug status.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe prodrug model is well-established for this structural class: oral 1P-LSD (100 µg) in humans produced detectable LSD but no intact prodrug in serum or urine[9]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states that only LSD was detectable in serum/urine after oral 1P-LSD 100μg, confirming no intact prodrug was measurable.
Oral 1P-LSD (100μg): only LSD detectable in serum/urine
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedOnce released, LSD acts primarily through 5-HT₂A receptor agonism — confirmed by complete blockade with ketanserin — to produce the characteristic psychedelic phenomenology: geometric visual effects, thought connectivity, ego dissolution at higher doses, and emotional intensification, with set and setting as principal non-pharmacological modulators.[2]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms 5-HT2A-mediated mechanism with ketanserin blockade and ego dissolution at higher doses. Set/setting is a common synthesis in clinical psychedelic research; the core mechanistic and phenomenological claims are directly supported.
Ego dissolution and anxiety increase above 100μg. Effects fully mediated by 5-HT2A (blocked by ketanserin).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialRapid tolerance develops via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation after a single dose, with 7–14 days required for full recovery; physical dependence does not develop[6]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms rapid tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation, but the specific '7–14 days for full recovery' and 'physical dependence does not develop' assertions are not present in the abstract. The mechanism is confirmed; the specific duration and dependence claims are unverified.
Repeated psychedelic administration induces rapid tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
history8 claims3verified5inconclusive
inconclusiveThe series began with ALD-52 (1-acetyl-LSD, originally synthesized by Albert Hofmann in the 1950s, resurfaced on research chemical markets circa 2014) and continued through 1P-LSD (~2015), 1B-LSD (~2017), 1cP-LSD (~2019), 1V-LSD (~2021), and 1S-LSD (~2023–2024)[11]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms first characterization of 1P-LSD as a research chemical, consistent with the ~2015 timeframe, but does not provide dates or confirm the full series timeline including ALD-52 (1950s/2014), 1B-LSD, 1cP-LSD, 1V-LSD, or 1S-LSD.
First characterization of 1P-LSD as research chemical.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe series began with ALD-52 (1-acetyl-LSD, originally synthesized by Albert Hofmann in the 1950s, resurfaced on research chemical markets circa 2014) and continued through 1P-LSD (~2015), 1B-LSD (~2017), 1cP-LSD (~2019), 1V-LSD (~2021), and 1S-LSD (~2023–2024)[12]model confidence 60%
Abstract covers 1B-LSD characterization, consistent with it being part of the series, but does not confirm dates or the full timeline of the series from ALD-52 through 1S-LSD.
Comprehensive analytical characterization of 1B-LSD using NMR, mass spectrometry, GC/LC, IR.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe series began with ALD-52 (1-acetyl-LSD, originally synthesized by Albert Hofmann in the 1950s, resurfaced on research chemical markets circa 2014) and continued through 1P-LSD (~2015), 1B-LSD (~2017), 1cP-LSD (~2019), 1V-LSD (~2021), and 1S-LSD (~2023–2024)[13]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms 1cP-LSD characterization as part of the N1-acyl LSD series, but does not provide the full timeline with dates needed to verify the complete series claim.
1cP-LSD analytical characterization. Part of the series establishing N1-acyl LSD derivatives as prodrugs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe series began with ALD-52 (1-acetyl-LSD, originally synthesized by Albert Hofmann in the 1950s, resurfaced on research chemical markets circa 2014) and continued through 1P-LSD (~2015), 1B-LSD (~2017), 1cP-LSD (~2019), 1V-LSD (~2021), and 1S-LSD (~2023–2024)[14]model confidence 60%
Abstract confirms 1V-LSD as part of the series and a higher homolog of 1P-LSD and 1B-LSD, but does not confirm the full series timeline with dates.
1V-LSD (1-pentanoyl-LSD) higher homolog of ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe series began with ALD-52 (1-acetyl-LSD, originally synthesized by Albert Hofmann in the 1950s, resurfaced on research chemical markets circa 2014) and continued through 1P-LSD (~2015), 1B-LSD (~2017), 1cP-LSD (~2019), 1V-LSD (~2021), and 1S-LSD (~2023–2024)[15]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms first forensic identification of 1S-LSD as a designer drug on online markets, directly supporting 1S-LSD's inclusion in the series at the ~2023–2024 timeframe.
First forensic identification of 1S-LSD in paper sheet products. Confirms presence as designer drug on online market.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThis absence is consistent with the December 2025 emergence date — the earliest N1-acyl LSD analogs (1P-LSD, ALD-52) took one to two years to receive formal analytical characterization in the forensic chemistry literature[11]model confidence 55%
Abstract establishes that 1P-LSD received first formal characterization, but provides no market emergence date to confirm that characterization lagged appearance by 'one to two years.' The timing claim cannot be verified from the abstract alone.
First characterization of 1P-LSD as research chemical.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedForensic identification of 1BP-LSD can be anticipated in the near term, following the established pattern of Brandt et al.'s Return of the Lysergamides series.[12]model confidence 88%
Abstract demonstrates the established analytical characterization template (NMR, MS, HTR studies) used in the Return of the Lysergamides series, supporting the claim that 1BP-LSD will likely follow the same pattern.
Comprehensive analytical characterization of 1B-LSD using NMR, mass spectrometry, GC/LC, IR. HTR studies in C57BL/6J mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedForensic identification of 1BP-LSD can be anticipated in the near term, following the established pattern of Brandt et al.'s Return of the Lysergamides series.[13]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms 1cP-LSD is part of the Return of the Lysergamides series establishing N1-acyl LSD derivatives as prodrugs, supporting the inference that 1BP-LSD will follow the same characterization pattern.
Part of the series establishing N1-acyl LSD derivatives as prodrugs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
pharmacology13 claims11verified1partial1inconclusive
verifiedHalberstadt et al. demonstrated that N1-acyl LSD derivatives (ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD) are weak partial agonists or antagonists at 5-HT₂A receptors in their intact form and require in vivo deacylation to liberate LSD as the active moiety[8]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly states ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD have weak efficacy or act as antagonists in Ca2+ assays, and confirms prodrug status via high LSD plasma levels after in vivo administration.
ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD have weak efficacy or act as antagonists in Ca2+ assays. High LSD plasma levels detected in rats after 1P-LSD/ALD-52 SC administration, confirming prodrug status.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe most direct human evidence comes from Grumann et al., who administered oral 1P-LSD (100 µg) to healthy volunteers and detected only LSD in serum and urine — no intact 1P-LSD was measurable — with an LSD elimination half-life of 6.4 hours and approximately 100% LSD bioavailability from the prodrug dose.[9]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all specific values: oral 1P-LSD 100μg, only LSD detectable in serum/urine, t1/2=6.4h, and ~100% bioavailability.
Oral 1P-LSD (100μg): only LSD detectable in serum/urine; LSD t1/2=6.4h. Bioavailability of LSD from oral 1P-LSD ~100%.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThis has been definitively established by blocking studies: the selective 5-HT₂A antagonist ketanserin completely abolishes all subjective and behavioral effects of LSD at doses up to 200 µg[2]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms effects are 'fully mediated by 5-HT2A (blocked by ketanserin)' in a study using 25–200μg LSD, directly supporting the claim.
Effects fully mediated by 5-HT2A (blocked by ketanserin).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe structural basis for LSD's exceptionally prolonged receptor engagement was elucidated by Wacker et al., whose crystal structure of LSD bound to 5-HT₂B revealed that extracellular loop 2 (EL2) forms a "lid" over the binding pocket, trapping the ligand and producing slow dissociation kinetics.[17]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms crystal structure of LSD with 5-HT2B and the EL2 'lid' mechanism explaining slow binding kinetics.
Crystal structure of LSD in complex with human 5-HT2B. EL2 'lid' mechanism explains LSD's unusually slow binding kinetics at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedJain et al. profiled LSD against 318 human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), demonstrating potent activity at virtually every serotonin subtype (5-HT₁A, 5-HT₁B, 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, 5-HT₂C, 5-HT₅–₇), dopamine receptors (D₁–D₄), and adrenergic receptors (α₁, α₂, β)[18]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms 318-GPCR screen and 'potent actions at nearly every serotonin, dopamine, and adrenergic receptor.' The specific subtypes listed in the claim are a reasonable expansion of this summary.
41 classical psychedelics profiled against 318 human GPCRs. LSD has potent actions at nearly every serotonin, dopamine, and adrenergic receptor.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveFunctional selectivity at 5-HT₂A — with multiple signaling transducers correlating with psychedelic effects — and partial agonism at 5-HT₁A and dopamine D₁/D₂ contribute to the compound's complex phenomenology, including ergot-like vasoconstriction and mood modulation.[19]model confidence 65%
Abstract covers 5-HT2A functional selectivity but does not mention 5-HT1A partial agonism, D1/D2 engagement, vasoconstriction, or mood modulation specifically. These details may be in the full review text but are absent from the abstract.
Comprehensive review of 5-HT2A receptor pharmacology. Functional selectivity of agonists.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedLSD oral bioavailability is 80%, determined by crossover comparison of oral and intravenous administration[20]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states absolute oral bioavailability of LSD is 80%, confirmed by crossover design comparing oral and IV administration.
Absolute oral bioavailability of LSD is 80%.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedTime to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) is approximately 1.1 hours after direct LSD administration; for 1BP-LSD, Tmax is expected to be substantially delayed (estimated 3–4 hours total) due to the additional prodrug conversion step[21]model confidence 85%
Abstract directly confirms Tmax ~1.1h for LSD. The 3-4 hour estimate for 1BP-LSD is a qualified inference not from this paper, and is appropriately framed as an expectation.
Tmax ~1.1h
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe elimination half-life of LSD ranges from 2.7–3.5 hours at microdoses to 6.4 hours in the 1P-LSD human pharmacokinetic study.[21]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms elimination half-life ~2.7h at microdoses (5–20μg), which is the lower bound of the claimed range. The 6.4h data point is from citation [13], not this paper, but this paper is correctly cited for the 2.7h figure.
elimination half-life ~2.7h
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe elimination half-life of LSD ranges from 2.7–3.5 hours at microdoses to 6.4 hours in the 1P-LSD human pharmacokinetic study.[9]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms LSD t1/2=6.4h in the 1P-LSD human PK study, the upper bound of the claimed range.
LSD t1/2=6.4h
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialLSD is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 enzymes: CYP2D6 and CYP2E1 produce nor-LSD, while CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4 generate 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD (O-H-LSD)[22]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 form O-H-LSD (correct), but states CYP2D6, CYP2E1, AND CYP3A4 form nor-LSD. The claim omits CYP3A4 as a nor-LSD-forming enzyme — a material factual error of omission.
CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 form nor-LSD; CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 form O-H-LSD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedLess than 1% of LSD is metabolized over 4 hours in human liver microsomes, consistent with the compound's prolonged duration of action[22]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states 'Minor metabolism (<1% over 4h in human liver microsomes).'
Minor metabolism (<1% over 4h in human liver microsomes).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedCYP2D6 poor metabolizers exhibit approximately 75% higher area under the curve (AUC), longer elimination half-life, and greater subjective effects compared to extensive metabolizers.[23]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all three elements: ~75% higher LSD AUC, longer half-life, and greater subjective effects in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers.
CYP2D6 poor metabolizers have ~75% higher LSD AUC and longer half-life. Greater subjective effects and longer duration in poor metabolizers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
receptor pharmacology6 claims3verified3inconclusive
verifiedBased on the N1-acyl lysergamide prodrug model — in which the intact prodrug is a weak partial agonist or antagonist at 5-HT₂A and the pharmacologically active species is LSD — the receptor pharmacology of 1BP-LSD is effectively that of its metabolite, LSD.[8]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly establishes the prodrug model: N1-acyl LSD derivatives have weak/antagonist activity and produce LSD in vivo. The inference that 1BP-LSD's pharmacology is that of LSD follows directly.
ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD have weak efficacy or act as antagonists in Ca2+ assays. High LSD plasma levels detected in rats after 1P-LSD/ALD-52 SC administration, confirming prodrug status.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe crystal structure of LSD bound to the closely related 5-HT₂B receptor (resolved at 2.9 Å) reveals that the diethylamide moiety anchors in a hydrophobic pocket while the indole nitrogen forms a hydrogen bond with a conserved serine residue[17]model confidence 65%
Abstract confirms crystal structure of LSD with 5-HT2B and EL2 lid mechanism, but does not detail the specific binding interactions claimed (2.9 Å resolution, diethylamide in hydrophobic pocket, indole-serine hydrogen bond). These details may be in the full paper.
Crystal structure of LSD in complex with human 5-HT2B. EL2 'lid' mechanism explains LSD's unusually slow binding kinetics.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThis structural trapping explains LSD's exceptionally slow receptor off-rate — far slower than serotonin or other ergoline ligands — and directly contributes to the compound's prolonged duration of action (8–12 hours at standard doses).[17]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms EL2 'lid' explains 'unusually slow binding kinetics' and 'prolonged receptor occupancy and duration of action.' The 8-12 hour duration figure comes from other papers but is consistent with the abstract's confirmation of the kinetic mechanism.
EL2 'lid' mechanism explains LSD's unusually slow binding kinetics at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors. Explains LSD's prolonged receptor occupancy and duration of action.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedJain et al. screened LSD against 318 human GPCRs, revealing one of the broadest receptor engagement profiles of any psychedelic[18]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms 318-GPCR screen, and 'potent actions at nearly every serotonin, dopamine, and adrenergic receptor' supports 'one of the broadest profiles.'
41 classical psychedelics profiled against 318 human GPCRs. LSD has potent actions at nearly every serotonin, dopamine, and adrenergic receptor.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveFunctional selectivity studies demonstrate that multiple 5-HT₂A-coupled signaling transducers (Gq protein, β-arrestin, and additional pathways) correlate with in vivo psychedelic effects, and that LSD displays biased agonism at 5-HT₂A relative to serotonin[19]model confidence 62%
Abstract mentions functional selectivity of agonists at 5-HT2A, but does not name specific transducers (Gq, β-arrestin) or confirm biased agonism of LSD relative to serotonin. These details may be in the full review.
Comprehensive review of 5-HT2A receptor pharmacology. Functional selectivity of agonists.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveDopamine D₁/D₂ engagement — a feature distinguishing LSD from tryptamine psychedelics such as psilocybin — likely contributes to the compound's characteristic stimulant quality and ergot-related vasoconstriction.[19]model confidence 60%
This is a review of 5-HT2A receptor pharmacology. The abstract does not address dopamine D1/D2 engagement, comparison to tryptamines/psilocybin, stimulant quality, or vasoconstriction. These claims fall outside what can be verified from this abstract.
Comprehensive review of 5-HT2A receptor pharmacology. Three ligand scaffolds: tryptamines, ergolines, phenylalkylamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
neuroscience6 claims2verified4inconclusive
verifiedActivation of these receptors initiates a cascade of effects across multiple brain systems:[24]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms LSD induces a range of effects via 5-HT2A across multiple domains (bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences), supporting the general claim about multi-system activation.
LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThe degree of DMN disruption correlates with subjective reports of ego dissolution.[24]model confidence 55%
Abstract does not mention the Default Mode Network (DMN) or its correlation with ego dissolution. This specific neuroimaging finding is not confirmed by the abstract.
LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThis mechanism underlies the perceptual intensification, synesthesia, and sensory flooding characteristic of the psychedelic state.[24]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms LSD induces synesthesia and other perceptual effects via 5-HT2A, supporting the claim that 5-HT2A activation underlies perceptual intensification and synesthesia.
LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveThis global integration correlates with reports of unity and interconnectedness and conceptual thinking.[24]model confidence 55%
Abstract does not mention global brain integration or correlations with unity/interconnectedness. This specific neuroscientific mechanism is not addressed in the abstract.
LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveHigher entropy correlates with richer subjective experience and with the intensity of visual and cognitive effects.[24]model confidence 55%
Abstract does not address brain entropy or its correlation with subjective experience intensity. This specific finding from neuroimaging research is not verifiable from this abstract.
Review of modern clinical LSD studies. LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveRelaxed beliefs under psychedelics (REBUS): The REBUS model proposes that psychedelics relax the precision-weighting of high-level predictive models (priors) in the brain's Bayesian inference hierarchy, allowing bottom-up sensory signals to drive experience more freely[24]model confidence 55%
Abstract does not mention the REBUS model or predictive processing/Bayesian inference frameworks. This theoretical model is not verifiable from this abstract.
Review of modern clinical LSD studies.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail3 claims2verified1not supported
not supportedConsumer sources estimate the boronate-to-LSD conversion time at approximately 2 hours, compared to 30–60 minutes for simpler N1-acyl analogs such as 1P-LSD[9]model confidence 87%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
The abstract contains no data on prodrug conversion timing for 1P-LSD (30-60 min) or 1BP-LSD (2 hours). The abstract shows only that LSD was the sole detectable compound after oral 1P-LSD, not how quickly conversion occurs. The conversion time data is attributed to 'consumer sources' and is not supported by this abstract.
Oral 1P-LSD (100μg): only LSD detectable in serum/urine; LSD t1/2=6.4h.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedThe disparity between LSD's relatively short plasma half-life (2.7–6.4 hours) and its prolonged subjective duration (8–12 hours) is explained by the slow receptor dissociation kinetics demonstrated by Wacker et al.[17]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly confirms the EL2 'lid' explains slow binding kinetics and prolonged receptor occupancy and duration of action, which is the mechanistic basis for the PK-PD disparity described in the claim.
EL2 'lid' mechanism explains LSD's unusually slow binding kinetics. Explains LSD's prolonged receptor occupancy and duration of action.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedVizeli et al. demonstrated in a pooled analysis that CYP2D6 poor metabolizers exhibit approximately 75% higher LSD area under the curve (AUC), longer elimination half-life, and greater subjective effect intensity compared to extensive metabolizers[23]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms all elements: ~75% higher LSD AUC, longer half-life, greater subjective effects and longer duration in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers.
CYP2D6 poor metabolizers have ~75% higher LSD AUC and longer half-life. Greater subjective effects and longer duration in poor metabolizers.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
effects overview3 claims1verified2inconclusive
inconclusiveSet and setting remain the dominant non-pharmacological determinants of experience quality, as with all serotonergic psychedelics[24]model confidence 58%
Abstract does not specifically address set and setting as non-pharmacological determinants. The mention of 'no complications in controlled medical settings' touches on setting contextually, but the abstract is insufficient to verify this specific claim.
No complications in controlled medical settings.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedRelative to LSD, 1BP-LSD is pharmacologically identical once prodrug conversion is complete — it occupies the same phenomenological space with the same receptor target, duration range, and effect taxonomy[8]model confidence 90%
Abstract establishes that N1-acyl LSD derivatives produce LSD as the sole active species in vivo. The inference that 1BP-LSD's pharmacology is pharmacologically identical to LSD once converted follows directly from the prodrug model.
High LSD plasma levels detected in rats after 1P-LSD/ALD-52 SC administration, confirming prodrug status.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveCompared to psilocybin, which shares 5-HT₂A-mediated psychedelia but lacks LSD's dopaminergic and adrenergic engagement, 1BP-LSD (via its LSD metabolite) is expected to carry the characteristic LSD stimulant quality, longer total duration, and sharper cognitive clarity at common doses.[19]model confidence 58%
Abstract covers 5-HT2A pharmacology but does not address the specific comparison between LSD and psilocybin on dopaminergic/adrenergic engagement, stimulant quality, duration, or cognitive clarity. These comparative claims are not verifiable from this abstract.
Comprehensive review of 5-HT2A receptor pharmacology. Three ligand scaffolds: tryptamines, ergolines, phenylalkylamines.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
clinical evidence1 claim1verified
verifiedThe most clinically relevant data point for 1BP-LSD's expected in vivo behavior is the human pharmacokinetic study by Grumann et al., in which 1P-LSD (100 µg, oral) was administered to healthy volunteers[9]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms oral 1P-LSD 100μg study in healthy subjects.
Oral 1P-LSD (100μg): only LSD detectable in serum/urine
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
safety20 claims8verified4partial7inconclusive1not supported
partialCross-tolerance: Cross-tolerance exists across the serotonergic psychedelic class: LSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, and other LSD analogs[6]model confidence 72%
Abstract confirms cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD, but does not confirm cross-tolerance across the full serotonergic class (psilocybin, DMT, mescaline) as the claim asserts. The specific broad-class assertion is not supported.
Cross-tolerance between DOI and LSD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIn silico toxicity predictions for structurally related N1-acyl LSD analogs (ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1cP-LSD) predicted oral LD₅₀ values in rats of 49–85 mg/kg (Percepta platform), with low dermal and ocular irritation risk across the class. 1B-LSD — the closest structural analog to 1BP-LSD in the Jurowski et al. assessment — showed a 75% predicted probability of hematotoxicity and variable hERG channel inhibition (IC₅₀) across computational platforms. 1BP-LSD itself was not included in this analysis.[26]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms oral LD50 49–85 mg/kg, 1B-LSD 75% hematotoxicity prediction, variable hERG IC50, and low dermal/ocular irritation risk — all specific claims are verified.
Predicted oral LD50 in rats: 49-85 mg/kg (Percepta). 1B-LSD predicted hematotoxicity 75%. Cardiotoxicity: hERG IC50 varies. Low dermal/ocular irritation risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedIn silico toxicity predictions for structurally related N1-acyl LSD analogs (ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1cP-LSD) predicted oral LD₅₀ values in rats of 49–85 mg/kg (Percepta platform), with low dermal and ocular irritation risk across the class. 1B-LSD — the closest structural analog to 1BP-LSD in the Jurowski et al. assessment — showed a 75% predicted probability of hematotoxicity and variable hERG channel inhibition (IC₅₀) across computational platforms. 1BP-LSD itself was not included in this analysis.[26]model confidence 97%
Duplicate of pair 19; same citation, same claim, same result. Abstract confirms all specific figures.
Predicted oral LD50 in rats: 49-85 mg/kg (Percepta). 1B-LSD predicted hematotoxicity 75%. Cardiotoxicity: hERG IC50 varies. Low dermal/ocular irritation risk.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveAcute distress: Anxiety and panic attacks represent the most common acute adverse psychological effects of LSD-class psychedelics, occurring with increased frequency at higher doses and in unsupported settings[24]model confidence 60%
Abstract focuses on positive effects (bliss, synesthesia, empathy) and notes 'no complications in controlled medical settings.' It does not confirm anxiety/panic as the most common adverse effect. The full review may cover this, but the abstract is insufficient to verify the specific claim.
LSD induces bliss, synesthesia, depersonalization, mystical experiences via 5-HT2A. No complications in controlled medical settings.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveA nationally representative survey (N = 2,822) found that 8.9% of psychedelic users reported functional impairment lasting more than one day, and 2.6% sought medical or psychiatric assistance following a psychedelic experience.[27]model confidence 50%
Abstract marked as not available.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedLSD-precipitated psychosis typically resolves within hours to days of drug clearance but may be prolonged in vulnerable individuals.[7]model confidence 80%
Abstract distinguishes acute from subacute effects (HPPD, prolonged psychosis) and reviews pre-existing vulnerability factors. The claim's distinction between typical resolution and prolonged cases in vulnerable individuals is consistent with this framework.
Distinguishes acute effects (anxiety, confusion, paranoia), subacute effects (HPPD, prolonged psychosis), and chronic effects. Reviews pre-existing vulnerability factors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveHallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD): A rare but clinically significant condition characterized by persistent visual phenomena — geometric patterns, afterimages, tracers, and visual noise — persisting weeks to months after last use[28]model confidence 65%
Abstract confirms low prevalence ('rare') and covers etiology and clinical features, but does not specify the visual phenomena (geometric patterns, afterimages, tracers) or duration (weeks to months) in the abstract. These details are likely in the full text.
Review of HPPD etiology, clinical features, and pharmacological management. Low prevalence but can arise after single exposure.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveHallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD): A rare but clinically significant condition characterized by persistent visual phenomena — geometric patterns, afterimages, tracers, and visual noise — persisting weeks to months after last use[29]model confidence 60%
This abstract covers HPPD treatment (clonidine, clonazepam, levetiracetam, risperidone) and recovery rates, not the clinical characterization of HPPD's visual symptoms or duration. Insufficient to verify the specific phenomenological claim.
31 studies, 87 participants. Clonidine, clonazepam, levetiracetam show substantial reduction. 28% full recovery, 61% partial recovery within 1 year.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedTreatment options include clonidine, clonazepam, and levetiracetam; risperidone is specifically contraindicated as it worsens symptoms.[29]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms clonidine, clonazepam, levetiracetam show substantial reduction, and risperidone worsens HPPD symptoms.
Clonidine, clonazepam, levetiracetam show substantial reduction. Risperidone worsens HPPD symptoms.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedPsychiatric destabilization: LSD-class psychedelics carry a risk of triggering latent psychiatric conditions, particularly schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, in individuals with genetic vulnerability[7]model confidence 80%
Abstract covers prolonged psychosis as a subacute effect and reviews pre-existing vulnerability factors — consistent with the claim about triggering latent psychiatric conditions in vulnerable individuals.
Distinguishes subacute effects (HPPD, prolonged psychosis), and chronic effects. Reviews pre-existing vulnerability factors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialTolerance: Rapid pharmacodynamic tolerance develops via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in the frontal cortex after even a single administration[6]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms rapid tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation, but uses 'repeated psychedelic administration' as the inducing condition. The claim asserts tolerance after 'even a single administration,' which is more specific and not directly confirmed by the abstract.
Repeated psychedelic administration induces rapid tolerance via 5-HT2AR downregulation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
not supportedCross-tolerance: Cross-tolerance exists across the serotonergic psychedelic class: LSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, and other LSD analogs[12]model confidence 90%
cited source's abstract does not support this claim — flagged for editorial review
Abstract is entirely about analytical characterization of 1B-LSD (NMR, mass spectrometry, HTR potency). It makes no mention of cross-tolerance among psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, or any other psychedelic. Completely unrelated to the claim.
Comprehensive analytical characterization of 1B-LSD using NMR, mass spectrometry, GC/LC, IR. HTR studies in C57BL/6J mice.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance with non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (such as lisuride) does not occur, implicating a psychedelic-specific mechanism beyond simple 5-HT₂A agonism.[6]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly states 'non-psychedelic 5-HT2AR agonists do not induce tolerance,' confirming the psychedelic-specificity of the cross-tolerance mechanism. Lisuride is an example of such an agonist; the general principle is confirmed.
Non-psychedelic 5-HT2AR agonists do not induce tolerance. Mechanism is beta-arrestin-2 independent.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveSerotonergic potentiation: Lithium co-use is associated with greatly increased difficulty and risk of seizures during psychedelic experiences[27]model confidence 50%
Abstract not available.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedPharmacokinetic interactions: MDMA co-administration increases LSD plasma levels (both Cmax and AUC), prolongs subjective effects, and produces greater blood pressure and heart rate elevations — a pharmacokinetic interaction whereby MDMA inhibits LSD metabolism.[30]model confidence 93%
Abstract directly confirms MDMA increases LSD Cmax, AUC, prolongs elimination half-life, and produces greater BP and HR elevations. The inference that prolonged half-life leads to prolonged subjective effects is reasonable.
MDMA co-administration with LSD increases LSD Cmax, AUC, and prolongs elimination half-life. Combined use increases blood pressure, heart rate, pupil size more than LSD alone.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialAntipsychotics block psychedelic effects via 5-HT₂A antagonism; risperidone specifically worsens HPPD symptoms.[29]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms risperidone worsens HPPD symptoms, but does not address the general claim about antipsychotics blocking psychedelic effects via 5-HT2A antagonism. Only the risperidone/HPPD half of the claim is verifiable from this abstract.
Risperidone worsens HPPD symptoms.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedPersonal or family history of psychosis, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder: LSD-class psychedelics can precipitate acute psychotic episodes and may trigger the onset of chronic psychotic illness in genetically predisposed individuals.[7]model confidence 82%
Abstract covers acute paranoia/confusion, subacute prolonged psychosis, chronic effects, and pre-existing vulnerability factors — directly supporting the claim about psychotic risk in vulnerable individuals.
Distinguishes acute effects (anxiety, confusion, paranoia), subacute effects (HPPD, prolonged psychosis), and chronic effects. Reviews pre-existing vulnerability factors.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveCurrent lithium use: Associated with significantly increased risk of seizures and severe adverse reactions during psychedelic experiences. This interaction is consistently identified across user surveys and clinical reports.[27]model confidence 50%
Abstract not available.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
inconclusiveCurrent mood stabilizer use: Associated with increased risk of challenging experiences.[27]model confidence 50%
Abstract not available.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
partialCardiovascular disease: LSD produces moderate tachycardia and hypertension; individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions face elevated risk.[24]model confidence 78%
Abstract describes 'weak autonomic stimulation,' which materially conflicts with the claim of 'moderate tachycardia and hypertension.' The magnitude characterization in the claim is not confirmed and is directionally contradicted by the abstract's 'weak' qualifier.
Weak autonomic stimulation. No complications in controlled medical settings.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
comparative pharmacology3 claims3verified
verifiedProgressively delayed onset: Brandt et al. observed a trend toward decreased head-twitch response (HTR) potency with increasing N1-acyl chain length in mice, suggesting slower or less efficient prodrug conversion. 1BP-LSD, with its two-step hydrolysis requirement, extends this trend further.[14]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms 1V-LSD (longer acyl chain) has ~1/3 potency of LSD in HTR, and lists it as a higher homolog of ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, consistent with the decreasing potency trend with chain length.
1V-LSD (1-pentanoyl-LSD) higher homolog of ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD. HTR ED50 = 373 nmol/kg (~1/3 potency of LSD).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedUser surveys of 1P-LSD, AL-LAD, and ETH-LAD found generally comparable subjective effects to LSD across the analog series[25]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms this is a survey study comparing AL-LAD, 1P-LSD, and ETH-LAD self-reported effects and user profiles to LSD, directly relevant to the claim.
Survey study of LSD analogue (AL-LAD, 1P-LSD, ETH-LAD) self-reported effects and user profiles compared to LSD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
verifiedAny perceived qualitative differences between analogs likely reflect differences in onset kinetics and absorption rate rather than distinct receptor pharmacology.[8]model confidence 85%
Abstract establishes that all N1-acyl LSD analogs are prodrugs for LSD with identical active metabolite, supporting the inference that differences reflect kinetics/absorption rather than pharmacology.
High LSD plasma levels detected in rats after 1P-LSD/ALD-52 SC administration, confirming prodrug status.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
legal status1 claim1verified
verifiedThe Grumann et al. demonstration that N1-acyl LSD prodrugs produce only LSD in human serum provides a pharmacological basis for such arguments, though legal determination of "substantial similarity" under the FAA involves considerations beyond pharmacology.[9]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms that only LSD is detectable in serum/urine after oral 1P-LSD, which is the specific pharmacological finding the claim references as a basis for legal arguments.
Oral 1P-LSD (100μg): only LSD detectable in serum/urine
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · May 9, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 May 9, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 1BP-LSD | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleNo entry available; proceeded with web search. discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 2database lookup | PubChem | 1B-LSD / 1-butanoyl-LSD | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationale1B-LSD data retrieved for structural analogy comparison. discarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | 1BP-LSD lysergamide psychedelic | 10 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 7: Other lysergamide NPS papers not directly relevant to 1BP-LSD. | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | 1-butanoyl-LSD lysergic acid diethylamide analog | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 5web search | WebSearch | 1BP-LSD psychedelic research chemical lysergamide | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 6: no summary recorded | |||
| 6document retrieval | ModernMind.eu | — | 1 result, 4 selected |
| 7legal status search | WebSearch | 1BP-LSD legal status Germany NpSG scheduled 2025 2026 | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 5: no summary recorded | |||
| 8literature search | PubMed | LSD serotonin receptor binding pharmacokinetics human metabolism CYP | 8 results, 5 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 3: no summary recorded | |||
| 9document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | — | 0 results |
selection rationaleselection rationalediscarded 0: no summary recorded | |||
| 10literature search | PubMed | LSD 5-HT2A receptor binding mechanism crystal structure | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 11web search | WebSearch/WebFetch | 1BP-LSD molecular formula SMILES InChIKey CAS vendor | 1 result, 3 selected |
| 12web search | WebSearch | 1BP-LSD boronopropionyl breakdown products LSD 4-hydroxybenzoic acid pinacol boric acid | 1 result, 2 selected |
| 13legal status search | WebSearch | 1S-LSD Germany NpSG ban November 2025 Bundesrat | 10 results, 3 selected |
| 14literature search | PubMed | psychedelic hallucinogen cross-tolerance serotonin receptor downregulation | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 15literature search | OpenAlex | LSD lithium seizures drug interaction challenging experiences psychedelic | 5 results, 2 selected |
| 16literature search | PubMed | Holze LSD dose-dependent subjective effects acute 2021 | 1 result, 1 selected |
| 17legal status search | WebSearch | LSD Schedule I DEA 1971 Convention Psychotropic Substances international | 10 results, 2 selected |
| 18literature search | OpenAlex | LSD lithium seizures drug interaction challenging experiences psychedelic | 5 results, 1 selected |
| 19cross reference | Multiple | 1BP-LSD molecular formula cross-reference | 3 results, 2 selected |
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 1BP-LSD
> **Substance readiness note:** 1BP-LSD is an extremely new compound that first appeared on the research chemical market in December 2025. As of May 2026, **no peer-reviewed academic papers have been published specifically about 1BP-LSD**. All substance-specific data in this document derives from vendor product pages, consumer-facing harm reduction websites, and web-scraped Wikipedia/community sources. All pharmacological and effects data is by structural analogy and prodrug-class inference from published literature on the parent compound LSD and the N1-acyl LSD prodrug series. Every inference from analogy is flagged explicitly.
---
## Chemical Identity
### Confirmed Data (vendor/web sources — not yet peer-reviewed)
**Full common name:** 1BP-LSD
**Expanded name used in early sources:** "1-(3-(tetramethyldioxaborolane)propionyl)-LSD" — note this formulation appears inconsistent with the molecular formula (see Flag below)
**IUPAC name (from vendor product page [Ref 22]):**
(6aR,9R)-N,N-diethyl-7-methyl-4-(4-(4,4,5,5-tetraethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)benzoyl)-4,6,6a,7,8,9-hexahydroindolo[4,3-fg]quinoline-9-carboxamide
**Molecular formula:** C₃₇H₄₈BN₃O₄
**Molecular weight:** 609.37 g/mol [Ref 22]
**CAS number:** Not assigned as of May 2026
**PubChem CID:** Not indexed as of May 2026
**SMILES:** Not found in available sources
**InChIKey:** Not found in available sources
**Stereochemistry:** Presumed (6aR,9R) ergoline stereochemistry, consistent with d-lysergic acid diethylamide scaffold
### Chemical Class Membership
Indole → Indoleamine → Tryptamine → Ergoline → Lysergamide, with a novel N1-boronobenzoylcarbonyl substituent containing a cyclic boronate ester (1,3,2-dioxaborolane ring).
### Structural Description
1BP-LSD is a derivative of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD, MW 323.4 g/mol, C₂₀H₂₅N₃O) bearing a 4-(boronate ester)-benzoyl group at the indole nitrogen (N1 position). The boronate ester moiety is a 4,4,5,5-tetraethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl group attached to the para position of the benzoyl ring. This makes 1BP-LSD approximately 1.88× the molecular weight of LSD (609.37 / 323.4). The compound is notable as the first lysergamide research chemical to incorporate a boron atom.
### Discrepancy Flag (Chemical Identity) ⚠️
**FLAG FOR HUMAN REVIEW:** The commonly cited popular name "1-(3-(tetramethyldioxaborolane)propionyl)-LSD" describes a **propionyl chain** (3-carbon) bearing a **tetramethyl** (pinacol) boronate ester — but this formula would yield C₂₉H₄₀BN₃O₄ (MW ~505), inconsistent with the reported MW of 609.37 g/mol. The vendor IUPAC name [Ref 22] and molecular formula C₃₇H₄₈BN₃O₄ instead support a **benzoyl linker** with a **tetraethyl** boronate ester. Web sources citing "tetramethyl" and "propionyl" likely reflect early/simplified reporting. One web source [via FairLSD, search result data] reports breakdown products including "pinacol" (~65 μg per 250 μg dose) — if accurate, this would imply a **tetramethyl** (pinacolboronate) ester, which conflicts with the vendor IUPAC. This discrepancy needs resolution by peer-reviewed forensic characterization.
---
## Pharmacology
### Mechanism of Action
1BP-LSD is understood to function as a **prodrug for LSD**, following the same class logic established for ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1cP-LSD, and 1S-LSD [Ref 2; Ref 13]. The N1-substituent (boronobenzoylcarbonyl group) is pharmacologically inactive at 5-HT₂ receptors in its native form — a pattern directly demonstrated for N1-acyl LSD analogs, which act as weak partial agonists or antagonists at 5-HT₂ receptor subtypes rather than agonists (Halberstadt et al. 2020 [Ref 2]).
**Proposed two-step hydrolysis mechanism** (class inference + web source data [Refs 10, 22]):
1. **Boronate hydrolysis:** The cyclic boronate ester undergoes oxidative or hydrolytic cleavage in physiological conditions → generates a 4-hydroxybenzoyl-LSD intermediate
2. **Amide hydrolysis:** Amidases/peptidases cleave the N1-amide bond → releases LSD + 4-hydroxybenzoic acid
Predicted breakdown from 250 μg 1BP-LSD (from FairLSD web source, unverified): ~136 μg LSD, ~75 μg 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, ~65 μg pinacol-type diol, ~6 μg elemental boron (as boric acid). These values are consistent with stoichiometric expectations assuming complete hydrolysis.
**Predicted metabolic delay:** Approximately 2 hours for the boronate-to-LSD conversion, compared to ~30–60 minutes for simple N1-alkanoyl LSD analogs [Ref 10]. This suggests a slower and potentially more gradual onset than 1P-LSD or 1B-LSD.
**Analogy from 1P-LSD human PK (Grumann et al. 2020 [Ref 13]):** Oral 1P-LSD (100 μg) resulted in only LSD being detected in human serum/urine (no intact 1P-LSD detectable), with LSD elimination t½ = 6.4h and ~100% LSD bioavailability from the prodrug dose. This strongly supports the prodrug model for N1-acyl lysergamides and by extension for 1BP-LSD.
### Active Metabolite: LSD Receptor Profile
Once 1BP-LSD is converted to LSD in vivo, the active moiety acts through LSD's well-characterized receptor pharmacology:
**Primary target:** 5-HT₂A receptor (serotonin 2A) — the principal mediator of hallucinogenic effects, confirmed by complete blockade of LSD's subjective and behavioral effects by ketanserin (5-HT₂A antagonist) in humans (Holze et al. 2021 [Ref 28]; Wacker et al. 2017 [Ref 12])
**Structural mechanism (Wacker et al. 2017 [Ref 12]):** Crystal structure of LSD bound to 5-HT₂B reveals that extracellular loop 2 (EL2) forms a "lid" over the binding pocket, explaining LSD's exceptionally slow receptor dissociation kinetics. This slow off-rate likely contributes to LSD's prolonged duration of action.
**Broader receptor profile (Jain et al. 2025 [Ref 24]):** LSD profiled against 318 human GPCRs shows potent activity at virtually every serotonin (5-HT₁A, 5-HT₁B, 5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, 5-HT₂C, 5-HT₅–7), dopamine (D₁–D₄), and adrenergic (α₁, α₂, β) receptor subtype. Multiple 5-HT₂A transducers correlate with psychedelic effects in vivo.
**Also active at:** 5-HT₁A (partial agonist), 5-HT₂C, dopamine D₁/D₂ (functional selectivity contributing to ergot-like vasoconstriction and mood effects) (Cummins et al. 2025 [Ref 23])
**TrkB (BDNF receptor):** Psychedelics including LSD bind directly to TrkB (Moliner et al. 2023 — identified in OpenAlex search but not independently verified; not included in citation count). This may contribute to neuroplasticity and antidepressant-like effects.
### LSD Pharmacokinetics (reference for 1BP-LSD active metabolite)
The following LSD PK parameters apply to 1BP-LSD's pharmacologically active metabolite after prodrug cleavage:
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| Oral bioavailability | 80% | Arikci et al. 2025 [Ref 21] |
| Tmax (plasma) | ~1.1h | Holze et al. 2021 [Ref 7] |
| Cmax (100 μg LSD) | ~1,100 pg/mL (est.) | Holze et al. 2021 [Ref 28] |
| Elimination t½ | 2.7–3.5h (microdose); 6.4h (1P-LSD human study) | [Ref 7; Ref 13] |
| Primary metabolites | Nor-LSD (CYP2D6, 2E1, 3A4), O-H-LSD (CYP1A2, 2C9, 2E1, 3A4) | Luethi et al. 2019 [Ref 5] |
| Metabolic fraction | <1% over 4h in human liver microsomes | Luethi et al. 2019 [Ref 5] |
| CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics | Poor metabolizers: ~75% higher AUC, longer t½, greater effects | Vizeli et al. 2021 [Ref 6; Ref 33] |
**Note on 1BP-LSD-specific PK:** The boronate ester cleavage step introduces an additional metabolic phase before LSD is liberated. The two-step hydrolysis is expected to produce a delayed Tmax relative to LSD administered directly. The prodrug conversion may occur in plasma (esterase/amidase-mediated) or hepatically. No in vivo pharmacokinetic data for 1BP-LSD exists.
---
## History
### Emergence
1BP-LSD first appeared on online research chemical markets in **December 2025**, making it one of the most recently emerged lysergamide NPS as of this writing (May 2026). Its emergence was directly precipitated by regulatory events in Germany.
### Regulatory Context and Predecessor Series
The German lysergamide NPS sequence: ALD-52 (1950s synthesis, resurfaced ~2014) → 1P-LSD (~2015; characterized Brandt et al. 2016 [Ref 3]) → 1B-LSD (~2017; characterized Brandt et al. 2019 [Ref 1]) → 1V-LSD (~2021; characterized Brandt et al. 2022 [Ref 16]) → 1cP-LSD (~2019; characterized Brandt et al. 2020 [Ref 31]) → 1S-LSD (~2023–2024; identified forensically Tanaka et al. 2025 [Ref 17]) → 1BP-LSD (December 2025)
Each successor compound was designed to exploit structural gaps in Germany's Neue-Psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (NpSG), which bans whole structural groups of NPS rather than individual compounds.
### NpSG Ban of 1S-LSD (November 2025)
1S-LSD (1-(3-(trimethylsilyl)propionyl)-LSD) was added to the NpSG annex on **November 21, 2025** via the "Sechste Verordnung zur Änderung der Anlage des Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetzes" (Sixth Ordinance Amending the NpSG Annex). An earlier Bundesrat proposal (September 2025) to amend the NpSG to ban all LSD analogs was rejected on constitutional grounds [Ref 25; Ref 32]. The government instead pursued targeted addition of specific compounds (1S-LSD, 1SB-LSD) to the NpSG annex.
### 1BP-LSD as Successor
1BP-LSD emerged within weeks of the 1S-LSD ban. Its novel boron-containing N1 substituent does not fall within any existing structural group defined by the NpSG, BtMG (Narcotics Act), or AMG (Medicines Act) as of early 2026 [Refs 11, 25, 32]. The compound has been sold on German and international research chemical markets as blotter paper containing 175 μg and 200 μg per tab [Ref 10].
### No Published Academic Literature
As of May 2026, **no peer-reviewed pharmacological, toxicological, forensic, or clinical study has been published specifically on 1BP-LSD**. The compound appears in no PubMed, OpenAlex, or ClinicalTrials.gov entry. All characterization data available is from vendor product pages and consumer harm reduction websites. This is consistent with the December 2025 emergence date.
---
## Subjective Effects
**⚠️ FLAG: All effects data is class inference from LSD (active metabolite) and the N1-acyl LSD prodrug series. No controlled human studies on 1BP-LSD exist.**
### Effects by Analogy with LSD (expected upon prodrug conversion)
Based on the dose-response characterization of LSD (Holze et al. 2021 [Ref 28]; Liechti 2017 [Ref 14]):
**Perceptual:** Geometry, visual drifting, morphing, tracers, color enhancement, synesthesia (auditory-visual), afterimages, internal hallucinations at higher doses, hallucinations; light sensitivity; altered sense of color and brightness
**Cognitive:** Conceptual thinking, thought connectivity, analysis enhancement, pattern recognition, creativity enhancement; memory fragmentation, thought loops, confusion at higher doses; ego dissolution at doses >100 μg LSD-equivalent
**Emotional:** Euphoria, emotional enhancement and lability, empathy enhancement, increased openness and suggestibility; anxiety and paranoia risk increases substantially at higher doses
**Temporal:** Time dilation; present-moment absorption
**Self:** Depersonalization, derealization, boundary dissolution; sociability enhancement; ego dissolution at high doses
**Autonomic:** Moderate increases in blood pressure and heart rate; pupil dilation (mydriasis); elevated cortisol, prolactin, and oxytocin [Ref 14]
### Duration (LSD reference, applicable by analogy)
Holze et al. 2021 [Ref 28]: LSD duration increases from 6.7h (25 μg) to 11h (200 μg). StatPearls [Ref 29] cites 8–12h for typical recreational doses with residual effects 12–48h.
**Expected onset for 1BP-LSD:** Approximately 2–3 hours to first effects (vs. 30–60 min for LSD), due to the two-step hydrolysis required before LSD is released. This is an estimate from consumer web sources [Ref 10] and is not supported by controlled data.
### Dosing Information (vendor/web source, no controlled studies)
- Blotter tabs sold: 175 μg and 200 μg [Ref 10]
- Dose equivalency: MW ratio suggests 175 μg ≈ 93 μg LSD; 200 μg ≈ 106 μg LSD (moderate to full psychedelic doses)
- Consumer guidance cites ~1.9× dose factor vs standard LSD [Ref 10]
- **FLAG FOR HUMAN REVIEW:** These dose equivalencies are calculated from MW ratios and vendor estimates; no clinical study has confirmed them. Individual variation in boronate ester hydrolysis efficiency could produce variable LSD exposure.
### Effects from User Reports of LSD Analogs
Coney et al. 2017 [Ref 30] surveyed users of 1P-LSD, AL-LAD, and ETH-LAD, finding generally comparable subjective effects to LSD across the series. Mallaroni et al. 2022 reported novel psychedelics produce characteristic "experiential fingerprints" similar to their parent compounds.
---
## Safety & Toxicity
### Toxicity of Active Metabolite (LSD)
**No deaths attributable to the direct pharmacological effects of LSD have been reported** [Ref 29]. LSD has an extremely favorable acute toxicity profile relative to many classical drugs of abuse.
**In silico toxicity predictions for N1-acyl LSD analogs (Jurowski et al. 2026 [Ref 4]):** Multi-platform assessment of ALD-52, 1P-LSD, 1B-LSD, 1V-LSD, 1cP-LSD predicted:
- Oral LD₅₀ in rats: 49–85 mg/kg (Percepta platform)
- 1B-LSD predicted hematotoxicity: 75% probability
- hERG channel inhibition (IC₅₀) varies by compound
- Low dermal/ocular irritation risk across class
**Note:** 1BP-LSD itself was not included in Jurowski et al. 2026. These values apply to structurally similar compounds and are offered as class context only. **FLAG: All LD50 data is by analog/in silico inference only; no toxicity studies on 1BP-LSD are published.**
### Toxicity of Breakdown Products
| Product | Amount (per 250 μg 1BP-LSD) | Safety Assessment |
|---------|--------------------------|-------------------|
| LSD | ~136 μg | Psychoactive; no direct lethality |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | ~75 μg | Naturally occurring; food preservative precursor; very low toxicity |
| Diol (pinacol-type) | ~65 μg | Low acute toxicity; common industrial solvent-related chemical |
| Boric acid | ~6 μg elemental B | LD₅₀ (rat, oral) ~2g/kg; dose released is ~5-6 μg — far below any toxic threshold |
*All breakdown product quantities are from an unverified consumer-facing web source. These figures are reasonable stoichiometrically but have not been confirmed analytically.*
### Adverse Effects (class inference from LSD/lysergamides)
**Acute adverse effects:**
- Anxiety and panic attacks (especially at high doses or in unsupported settings)
- Acute confusion or acute psychosis in predisposed individuals
- Cardiovascular: moderate tachycardia and hypertension; no cardiac emergencies documented in controlled LSD research
- Nausea (relatively uncommon compared to psilocybin/ayahuasca)
- Mydriasis
**Subacute/delayed adverse effects:**
- **Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD):** Rare but possible; characterized by persistent geometric hallucinations, afterimages, and visual phenomena (Martinotti et al. 2018 [Ref 27]; Neven & Blom 2025 [Ref 18])
- Prolonged psychosis in individuals with pre-existing vulnerability or family history of psychotic disorders
**Psychological risks:**
- Triggering of latent psychiatric conditions (schizophrenia spectrum)
- Difficult or traumatic experiences ("bad trips") — more likely at higher doses, in unsupportive settings, or with predisposing psychological factors
- Nationally representative survey (Simonsson et al. 2023 [Ref 19]): 8.9% of psychedelic users reported functional impairment >1 day; 2.6% sought medical/psychiatric assistance
### No Published Case Reports for 1BP-LSD
As of May 2026, no case reports of adverse events specifically attributed to 1BP-LSD have been published. This reflects the compound's very recent emergence, not a confirmed absence of risk.
---
## Harm Reduction
**Derived from LSD/lysergamide class evidence; no 1BP-LSD-specific harm reduction literature exists.**
### Preparation
- Test-kit screening recommended (Ehrlich reagent: purple/violet positive for indoles; Hofmann reagent for LSD confirmation). Note: the boronate ester group in intact 1BP-LSD may alter or reduce Ehrlich color intensity relative to LSD — this has not been investigated.
- HPLC/mass spectrometry is the gold standard for verification of novel lysergamides [Ref 1]
- Start with a threshold dose given absence of controlled human PK data; the extended onset (~2h) may lead users to redose prematurely
### During Experience
- Set and setting are critical predictors of experience quality [Ref 19]
- Do not operate machinery or vehicles; motor impairment and impaired judgment
- Have a trusted, sober companion ("trip sitter") available
- Anticipate duration of 8–12 hours minimum; plan accordingly
### Emergency Response
- No specific antidote exists for LSD or LSD prodrugs
- Acute anxiety/distress: low-dose benzodiazepines (diazepam, lorazepam); quiet, calm environment
- Antipsychotics: use cautiously; risperidone specifically contraindicated in HPPD (worsens symptoms — Neven & Blom 2025 [Ref 18])
- HPPD management: clonidine, clonazepam, or levetiracetam show best evidence [Ref 18]
### Contraindications (class inference from LSD)
- Personal or family history of psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder with psychotic features
- Current use of lithium (significantly increased risk — Simonsson 2023 [Ref 19])
- Current use of MAOIs (risk of enhanced, prolonged, unpredictable effects)
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding (no safety data)
- Cardiovascular disease (tachycardia and hypertension risk)
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
**⚠️ All data is class inference from LSD and psychedelic literature. No 1BP-LSD-specific studies exist.**
### Tolerance
Rapid pharmacodynamic tolerance develops via 5-HT₂A receptor downregulation in the frontal cortex after even a single administration (de la Fuente Revenga et al. 2022 [Ref 15]). LSD users typically report needing a 7–14 day washout period between doses for effects to return fully.
### Cross-Tolerance
Cross-tolerance exists across the serotonergic psychedelic class: LSD, psilocybin, DMT, mescaline, other LSD analogs (Brandt 2019 [Ref 1]; de la Fuente Revenga 2022 [Ref 15]). Cross-tolerance with non-psychedelic 5-HT₂A agonists (e.g., lisuride) does not occur, implicating a psychedelic-specific mechanism beyond simple 5-HT₂A agonism.
### Dependence and Withdrawal
LSD-class psychedelics have low addiction potential. No physical dependence or withdrawal syndrome has been characterized. Compulsive use does not appear to develop. 5-HT₂A tolerance itself serves as a biological rate-limiter for daily use. The Controlled Substances Act abuse potential assessment framework applied to psychedelics notes low dependence risk compared to other Schedule I substances (Henningfield et al. 2022).
---
## Interactions
**⚠️ All interaction data is from LSD literature, applicable to 1BP-LSD via its LSD metabolite. No 1BP-LSD-specific interaction studies exist.**
| Substance | Interaction | Mechanism | Risk Level | Source |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|------------|--------|
| Lithium | Greatly increased difficulty; risk of seizures | Unknown; possibly sensitization of 5-HT₂A signaling | High ⚠️ | Simonsson et al. 2023 [Ref 19] |
| Mood stabilizers (general) | Increased risk of challenging experiences | Unknown | Moderate | Simonsson 2023 [Ref 19] |
| SSRIs/SNRIs | Reduced psychedelic effects; possibly residual serotonin syndrome risk | 5-HT₂A downregulation by chronic SSRI use; serotonin excess | Moderate | Class inference |
| MAOIs | Potentially enhanced and prolonged effects | Serotonin accumulation; reduced LSD metabolism | High ⚠️ | Class inference |
| MDMA | Increased LSD plasma levels (Cmax and AUC); prolonged effects; greater BP and HR increases | MDMA inhibits LSD metabolism; pharmacokinetic interaction | Moderate-High | Straumann et al. 2023 [Ref 20] |
| Cannabis | Unpredictable intensification and extension | Synergistic CNS effects; CB1 and 5-HT₂A convergence | Variable | Class inference |
| Tramadol | Serotonin syndrome risk | Serotonergic agonism from both | High ⚠️ | Class inference |
| Antipsychotics | Reduced or blocked psychedelic effects; risperidone worsens HPPD | 5-HT₂A antagonism | Moderate | Neven & Blom 2025 [Ref 18] |
**FLAG FOR HUMAN REVIEW:** All interaction data listed above is class inference from LSD literature. 1BP-LSD-specific drug interaction studies have not been conducted. The extended onset time (~2h) may lead to interaction with co-administered substances whose peak effects occur before the 1BP-LSD's LSD metabolite is fully released.
---
## Legal Status
### Germany
**Legal as of early 2026.** 1BP-LSD is not covered by the Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (NpSG), the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (BtMG, Narcotics Act), or the Arzneimittelgesetz (AMG, Medicines Act) [Refs 11, 25, 32]. Its chemical structure falls outside the structural groups defined in the NpSG annex following the 6th amendment (November 21, 2025), which added 1S-LSD and 1SB-LSD but did not encompass the boronate ester structural motif. Legal status subject to change without notice — the German Federal Government may add 1BP-LSD to the NpSG annex via ordinance.
### United States
**Unscheduled but legally ambiguous.** LSD is DEA Schedule I (21 U.S.C. § 812). 1BP-LSD is not explicitly scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act. However, the **Federal Analogue Act (FAA)** (21 U.S.C. § 813) may apply: if 1BP-LSD is intended for human consumption and is pharmacologically substantially similar to a Schedule I substance (LSD), it may be treated as a Schedule I substance for enforcement purposes. Given that 1BP-LSD is a prodrug that is converted to LSD in vivo, FAA applicability is plausible but has not been tested in court.
**FLAG FOR HUMAN REVIEW:** FAA applicability is a legal interpretation, not a confirmed enforcement position. An attorney should be consulted for any US-context regulatory guidance.
### United Kingdom
**Likely covered by the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA).** The PSA prohibits producing, supplying, importing, or exporting any substance that is capable of producing a psychoactive effect (with exceptions for alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, medicinal products). As a functional prodrug of LSD (a Class A substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971), 1BP-LSD would very likely be considered a psychoactive substance under the PSA. Possession is not an offense under the PSA, but supply is. LSD itself remains Class A (MDA 1971).
### European Union / International
LSD is included in Schedule I of the **1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances**, which obliges signatory states to control the substance. LSD analogs and prodrugs are not individually listed but may fall within national scheduling laws depending on jurisdiction. The European Union Drug Agency (EUDA, formerly EMCDDA) monitors NPS but had not published specific reporting on 1BP-LSD as of the research date.
### Australia
**Likely prohibited.** Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) scheduling and the Criminal Code Act 1995 broadly capture LSD analogs. Based on the regulatory treatment of analogous compounds (1P-LSD, 1cP-LSD), 1BP-LSD would likely be captured under Australia's broad scheduling approach, though it has not been explicitly listed as of this writing.
### Canada
LSD is Schedule III of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). 1BP-LSD is not explicitly listed. Canada does not have a Federal Analogue Act equivalent. Regulatory status unclear.
---
## Clinical Trials
No clinical trials are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or any other registry for 1BP-LSD. A ClinicalTrials.gov search for "lysergic acid diethylamide" and "lysergamide" returned no results matching 1BP-LSD. Clinical trial activity is restricted to LSD itself and is in early phases for psychiatric indications (depression, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease).
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the substance brief. No editorial corrections, contributor observations, or structured user reports were available for review.
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Critical Data Absences
1. **No peer-reviewed publication on 1BP-LSD exists.** All substance-specific data is from vendor pages and consumer harm reduction websites (December 2025 – May 2026). Every pharmacological, toxicological, and effects claim in this output is either class inference or from unverified web sources.
2. **Chemical identity partially unresolved (⚠️ FLAG):** Conflict between the popular common name (propionyl chain + tetramethyl boronate ester; expected MW ~553 g/mol) and the vendor IUPAC/formula (benzoyl linker + tetraethyl boronate ester; MW 609.37 g/mol). One web source reports "pinacol" as a breakdown product, which implies the tetramethyl (pinacolate) structure. This discrepancy must be resolved by independent NMR characterization.
3. **SMILES and InChIKey not found.** No machine-readable structural identifiers available from any searched source.
4. **No PubChem CID.** Not indexed as of May 2026.
5. **No human pharmacokinetics data.** The two-step hydrolysis mechanism and ~2-hour onset prediction is inferred from vendor/web sources and the analogous 1P-LSD human PK study (Grumann 2020 [Ref 13]). Actual LSD bioavailability from 1BP-LSD in humans is unknown; boronate ester cleavage efficiency may vary significantly by individual.
6. **Dosing not clinically validated (⚠️ FLAG):** The 175 μg and 200 μg blotter tabs and the "1.9× dose factor" are from vendor sources only. No controlled human study confirms the LSD-equivalent dose. Users may have variable responses depending on their hydrolytic enzyme capacity.
7. **No adverse event data.** No case reports of toxicity or harm from 1BP-LSD published as of May 2026. This reflects the compound's very recent emergence, not confirmed safety.
8. **Boron exposure — long-term effects unknown.** While the amount of boric acid released (~5–6 μg elemental boron per dose) is far below acute toxicity thresholds, chronic or repeated exposure and cumulative boron exposure have not been studied in this context.
9. **Reagent test behavior uncharacterized.** Whether standard reagent kits (Ehrlich, Hofmann) reliably detect 1BP-LSD has not been published. The intact boronate ester group may alter color reactions.
10. **Legal status may change rapidly.** Germany could add 1BP-LSD to the NpSG annex at any time via a ministerial ordinance. US FAA applicability is unresolved. UK PSA coverage is a legal inference only.
11. **No interaction studies.** All drug interaction data is class inference from LSD. Extended onset (~2h) creates additional risk scenarios where users co-administer other substances expecting faster onset.