1,3-Butanediol
Studies and references cited across this article, graded by evidence strength.
Inconclusive means the cited source neither confirms nor refutes the claim — a lower-confidence badge, not an error.
Data points an editor reviewed and accepted for publication.
Value Provenance
Dosing
oraltrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 0.1 g/kg | 0.1 g/kg | low |
| Low | 0.2–0.3 g/kg | 0.2–0.3 g/kg | low |
| Common | 0.35–0.5 g/kg | 0.35–0.5 g/kg | low |
| Strong | 0.5–0.7 g/kg | 0.5–0.7 g/kg | low |
| Heavy | 0.7+ g/kg | 0.7+ g/kg | low |
| Editorial | No published dose-response curve for psychoactive effects exists. Ranges inferred from: Shaw 2019 (0.35 g/kg produced GI symptoms, euphoria, dizziness in some participants); Lowder 2023 (~0.5 g/kg split-dosed, well tolerated, no sleepiness); historical Ketone-IQ data (0.5-0.7 g/kg acute produced nausea/euphoria/dizziness); PsychonautWiki community reports. These are editorial proposals based on limited evidence — no controlled human dose-response study has been conducted. Widened ranges to account for uncertainty. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published dose-response curve for psychoactive effects exists. Ranges inferred from: Shaw 2019 (0.35 g/kg produced GI symptoms, euphoria, dizziness in some participants); Lowder 2023 (~0.5 g/kg split-dosed, well tolerated, no sleepiness); historical Ketone-IQ data (0.5-0.7 g/kg acute produced nausea/euphoria/dizziness); PsychonautWiki community reports. These are editorial proposals based on limited evidence — no controlled human dose-response study has been conducted. Widened ranges to account for uncertainty. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
Duration
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 20–40 minutes | 20–40 minutes | low |
| Editorial | BHB elevation begins ~30 min post-ingestion (Lowder 2023). Direct parent compound effects may onset earlier. No published data on subjective onset time specifically. Estimated from BHB PK and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningBHB elevation begins ~30 min post-ingestion (Lowder 2023). Direct parent compound effects may onset earlier. No published data on subjective onset time specifically. Estimated from BHB PK and community reports. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Come uptrace | 20–30 minutes | 20–30 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Inferred from BHB PK trajectory (Lowder 2023 Tmax ~2.25h) and community reports of relatively rapid come-up. No controlled data on subjective come-up duration. | ||
ReasoningReasoningInferred from BHB PK trajectory (Lowder 2023 Tmax ~2.25h) and community reports of relatively rapid come-up. No controlled data on subjective come-up duration. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Peaktrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | BHB Cmax at ~2.25 hours post-dose with split dosing (Lowder 2023). Community reports describe peak effects shorter than ethanol. Estimated peak duration from BHB PK plateau and PsychonautWiki descriptions. | ||
ReasoningReasoningBHB Cmax at ~2.25 hours post-dose with split dosing (Lowder 2023). Community reports describe peak effects shorter than ethanol. Estimated peak duration from BHB PK plateau and PsychonautWiki descriptions. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Offsettrace | 45–90 minutes | 45–90 minutes | low |
| Editorial | Community reports describe faster resolution than ethanol. BHB returns toward baseline within 3-5 hours of split dosing (Lowder 2023). Offset estimated from PK decline curve and community reports. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCommunity reports describe faster resolution than ethanol. BHB returns toward baseline within 3-5 hours of split dosing (Lowder 2023). Offset estimated from PK decline curve and community reports. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| Totaltrace | 2–4 hours | 2–4 hours | low |
| Editorial | No published subjective duration data. PsychonautWiki and community reports describe duration shorter than ethanol. BHB elevation window of 1-5 hours (Egan 2025, Lowder 2023) with subjective experience likely shorter than full PK window. Frye 1981 comparative data support shorter-duration CNS depression vs ethanol. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published subjective duration data. PsychonautWiki and community reports describe duration shorter than ethanol. BHB elevation window of 1-5 hours (Egan 2025, Lowder 2023) with subjective experience likely shorter than full PK window. Frye 1981 comparative data support shorter-duration CNS depression vs ethanol. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
| After effectstrace | 1–3 hours | 1–3 hours | low |
| Editorial | Residual BHB elevation may persist after subjective effects resolve. Hypoglycemia risk window extends beyond peak. No published aftereffects duration data. Estimated from BHB PK tail and metabolic effects described by McCarthy 2021 and Tobin 1975. | ||
ReasoningReasoningResidual BHB elevation may persist after subjective effects resolve. Hypoglycemia risk window extends beyond peak. No published aftereffects duration data. Estimated from BHB PK tail and metabolic effects described by McCarthy 2021 and Tobin 1975. Evidence basis: community_consensus_small | |||
Safety
Toxicity Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute | low | low | medium |
| Chronic | moderate | moderate | medium |
| Organs Affected | gastrointestinal, liver, metabolic | gastrointestinal, liver, metabolic | medium |
| Editorial | Acute: rat oral LD50 of 18,610 mg/kg (McCarthy 2021, ChemicalBook) is ~2.5x ethanol; human studies to 40 g/day show no significant adverse effects; FDA GRAS status. Chronic: classified as moderate (downgraded from potentially high due to reliance on animal data): physical dependence demonstrated in rats (Frye 1981), hepatic sinusoidal dilation at 20% drinking water (McCarthy 2021), but no human chronic toxicity beyond 28-day RCT (Chen 2021). Morris 2026 flags limited population-level safety data. | ||
ReasoningReasoningAcute: rat oral LD50 of 18,610 mg/kg (McCarthy 2021, ChemicalBook) is ~2.5x ethanol; human studies to 40 g/day show no significant adverse effects; FDA GRAS status. Chronic: classified as moderate (downgraded from potentially high due to reliance on animal data): physical dependence demonstrated in rats (Frye 1981), hepatic sinusoidal dilation at 20% drinking water (McCarthy 2021), but no human chronic toxicity beyond 28-day RCT (Chen 2021). Morris 2026 flags limited population-level safety data. Evidence basis: animal_study | |||
Dependence Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | moderate | moderate | low |
| Psychological | low | low | low |
| Compulsive Redosing | low | low | low |
| Dose Escalation | moderate | moderate | low |
| Editorial | Physical dependence demonstrated in rats by Frye et al. 1981 (withdrawal CNS hyperexcitability) and cross-tolerance with ethanol by Majchrowicz 1976. No human dependence data exist. Physical dependence rated moderate (downgraded from high based on animal-only evidence). Psychological dependence and compulsive redosing rated low by inference from ethanol class — shorter duration and GI side effects may limit abuse potential, but no human data confirm this. | ||
ReasoningReasoningPhysical dependence demonstrated in rats by Frye et al. 1981 (withdrawal CNS hyperexcitability) and cross-tolerance with ethanol by Majchrowicz 1976. No human dependence data exist. Physical dependence rated moderate (downgraded from high based on animal-only evidence). Psychological dependence and compulsive redosing rated low by inference from ethanol class — shorter duration and GI side effects may limit abuse potential, but no human data confirm this. Evidence basis: animal_study | |||
Withdrawal Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | moderate | moderate | low |
| Symptoms | CNS hyperexcitability, tremor, increased seizure susceptibility | CNS hyperexcitability, tremor, increased seizure susceptibility | low |
| Fatal | No | No | low |
| Medical Supervision | Required | Required | low |
| Editorial | Withdrawal demonstrated in rats (Frye 1981): CNS hyperexcitability analogous to sedative-hypnotic withdrawal after chronic 1,3-BD administration. No human withdrawal cases published. Severity rated moderate based on animal data showing seizure susceptibility increase; medical supervision recommended given parallels to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Fatality rated false but with low confidence — human data absent. | ||
ReasoningReasoningWithdrawal demonstrated in rats (Frye 1981): CNS hyperexcitability analogous to sedative-hypnotic withdrawal after chronic 1,3-BD administration. No human withdrawal cases published. Severity rated moderate based on animal data showing seizure susceptibility increase; medical supervision recommended given parallels to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Fatality rated false but with low confidence — human data absent. Evidence basis: animal_study | |||
Tolerance Profiletrace
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buildup | moderate | moderate | low |
| Half-life | — | — | low |
| Full Reset | — | — | low |
| Cross-tolerances | ethanol | ethanol | low |
| Editorial | Tolerance demonstrated in rats by Frye et al. 1981 with chronic 1,3-BD administration. Cross-tolerance with ethanol established by Majchrowicz 1976 and Frye 1981. No quantitative tolerance kinetics (buildup rate, half-life, reset time) have been published for 1,3-BD in any species. Buildup rated moderate by analogy with ethanol tolerance development pattern. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTolerance demonstrated in rats by Frye et al. 1981 with chronic 1,3-BD administration. Cross-tolerance with ethanol established by Majchrowicz 1976 and Frye 1981. No quantitative tolerance kinetics (buildup rate, half-life, reset time) have been published for 1,3-BD in any species. Buildup rated moderate by analogy with ethanol tolerance development pattern. Evidence basis: animal_study | |||
Effects & Profile
Contraindications
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| metabolic diabetes mellitustrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Tobin et al. 1975 documented blood glucose reduction in humans receiving 1,3-BD. McCarthy et al. 2021 confirmed hypoglycemia in animal models. No published contraindication guidelines specific to 1,3-BD exist, but the hypoglycemic effect is well-documented. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTobin et al. 1975 documented blood glucose reduction in humans receiving 1,3-BD. McCarthy et al. 2021 confirmed hypoglycemia in animal models. No published contraindication guidelines specific to 1,3-BD exist, but the hypoglycemic effect is well-documented. | |||
| metabolic hypoglycemia susceptibilitytrace | absolute | absolute | medium |
| Editorial | Tobin 1975 and McCarthy 2021 document glucose reduction. In individuals already prone to hypoglycemia, additional glucose-lowering effect poses serious risk. | ||
ReasoningReasoningTobin 1975 and McCarthy 2021 document glucose reduction. In individuals already prone to hypoglycemia, additional glucose-lowering effect poses serious risk. | |||
| pregnancy breastfeeding pregnancytrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Ishimwe et al. 2022 is the only pregnancy-relevant study — periconceptional rat data showing no adverse fetal effects. No human data. Precautionary classification as relative contraindication. | ||
ReasoningReasoningIshimwe et al. 2022 is the only pregnancy-relevant study — periconceptional rat data showing no adverse fetal effects. No human data. Precautionary classification as relative contraindication. | |||
| psychiatric alcohol use disordertrace | relative | relative | medium |
| Editorial | Cross-tolerance with ethanol established by Majchrowicz 1976 and Frye 1981. Li et al. 2024 and 2026 show paradoxical craving reduction. The risk-benefit profile for AUD individuals is complex and unresolved. | ||
ReasoningReasoningCross-tolerance with ethanol established by Majchrowicz 1976 and Frye 1981. Li et al. 2024 and 2026 show paradoxical craving reduction. The risk-benefit profile for AUD individuals is complex and unresolved. | |||
| other concurrent CNS depressant usetrace | relative | relative | low |
| Editorial | Class-level inference from ethanol-like CNS depressant profile (Frye 1981). No published 1,3-BD-specific interaction data with benzodiazepines, opioids, or GHB. | ||
ReasoningReasoningClass-level inference from ethanol-like CNS depressant profile (Frye 1981). No published 1,3-BD-specific interaction data with benzodiazepines, opioids, or GHB. | |||
Timeline Phases
oral
| Field | Published | AI Proposed | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onsettrace | 1200–2400 sec(i=0.05) | 1200–2400 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | No published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | |||
| Come uptrace | 1200–1800 sec(i=0.30) | 1200–1800 sec(i=0.30) | low |
| Editorial | No published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | |||
| Peaktrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=1.00) | 2700–5400 sec(i=1.00) | low |
| Editorial | No published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | |||
| Resolutiontrace | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.20) | 2700–5400 sec(i=0.20) | low |
| Editorial | No published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | |||
| Afterglowtrace | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.05) | 3600–10800 sec(i=0.05) | low |
| Editorial | No published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | ||
ReasoningReasoningNo published duration data specific to subjective psychoactive effects exist for 1,3-BD. Timeline inferred from: BHB PK data (Tmax ~2.25 hours, ketosis duration 1-5 hours depending on dose protocol — Lowder 2023, Egan 2025), community reports of shorter duration than ethanol (PsychonautWiki), and Frye 1981 comparative data showing shorter CNS depression duration than ethanol. Phase boundaries are editorial estimates. | |||
Dose Tier Summaries
At threshold doses (~0.1 g/kg oral, approximately 7 g for a 70 kg person), effects are subtle and easily overlooked. A faint sense of relaxation or mild mood lift may be perceptible, similar to the first sip of an alcoholic drink. Most users report no clear psychoactive shift at this level. Physically, slight warmth in the abdomen may be noticed. The bitter-sweet taste is present but manageable. Gastrointestinal effects are generally absent at threshold doses. Functional impairment is negligible. Sleep and appetite are unaffected.
No published threshold dose data exist for psychoactive effects. Estimated from the lower bound of doses where GI/CNS effects begin to appear in Shaw 2019 (0.35 g/kg) and community reports (PsychonautWiki). Flagged as editorial proposal requiring verification.
ReasoningReasoning
No published threshold dose data exist for psychoactive effects. Estimated from the lower bound of doses where GI/CNS effects begin to appear in Shaw 2019 (0.35 g/kg) and community reports (PsychonautWiki). Flagged as editorial proposal requiring verification.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At light doses (~0.2–0.3 g/kg oral, approximately 14–21 g for a 70 kg person), a mild alcohol-like relaxation becomes clearly perceptible. Anxiety suppression is subtle but present, with mild disinhibition. Mood is gently elevated without pronounced euphoria. Gastrointestinal discomfort may begin to emerge at the upper end of this range, particularly on an empty stomach. A slight sense of dizziness is possible. The bitter-sweet taste of the liquid is often described as aversive. Duration is shorter than an equivalent subjective level of alcohol intoxication. Functional capacity remains largely intact, though fine motor coordination may be mildly affected.
Inferred from Shaw 2019 data (0.35 g/kg produced GI symptoms and mild euphoria/dizziness in some participants) and PsychonautWiki community reports describing alcohol-like effects at lower doses. No controlled human data specifically characterize this range.
ReasoningReasoning
Inferred from Shaw 2019 data (0.35 g/kg produced GI symptoms and mild euphoria/dizziness in some participants) and PsychonautWiki community reports describing alcohol-like effects at lower doses. No controlled human data specifically characterize this range.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At common doses (~0.35–0.5 g/kg oral, approximately 25–35 g for a 70 kg person), the full alcohol-like intoxication profile emerges. Disinhibition, relaxation, and euphoria are clearly present. Anxiety suppression is pronounced. Dizziness becomes noticeable. Thought deceleration and mild analysis suppression are reported at this level. Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, abdominal cramping) are common and dose-limiting, particularly with rapid consumption. Divided dosing over 30–60 minutes substantially reduces GI distress. Consuming with food improves tolerability. Subjective effects last approximately 2–3 hours, notably shorter than ethanol at equivalent intoxication levels. Motor coordination is impaired. Driving and operation of machinery are unsafe.
Shaw 2019 documented euphoria, dizziness, and nausea at 0.35 g/kg. Lowder 2023 used 34.5 g (R)-1,3-BD (~0.5 g/kg) with split dosing and found good tolerability, mild GI symptoms, no sleepiness. Historical dose-escalation data (Ketone-IQ) describe nausea/euphoria/dizziness at 0.5–0.7 g/kg acutely, mitigated by divided dosing.
ReasoningReasoning
Shaw 2019 documented euphoria, dizziness, and nausea at 0.35 g/kg. Lowder 2023 used 34.5 g (R)-1,3-BD (~0.5 g/kg) with split dosing and found good tolerability, mild GI symptoms, no sleepiness. Historical dose-escalation data (Ketone-IQ) describe nausea/euphoria/dizziness at 0.5–0.7 g/kg acutely, mitigated by divided dosing.
Evidence basis: published_case_series
At strong doses (~0.5–0.7 g/kg oral, approximately 35–49 g for a 70 kg person), pronounced CNS depression occurs. Euphoria and disinhibition are marked. Dizziness intensifies. Motor impairment is significant — coordination is visibly affected. Thought deceleration and analysis suppression are more prominent. Gastrointestinal distress becomes a major limiting factor at this dose range when consumed acutely. Nausea and abdominal cramping are frequent. Divided dosing protocols are strongly recommended. Hypoglycemia risk increases and may contribute to fatigue or lightheadedness. Impairment duration extends to 3–4 hours. Functional capacity is substantially reduced. Sleep quality may be affected. This range approaches the upper boundary of doses studied in controlled human settings.
Historical dose-escalation data describe nausea, euphoria, and dizziness at 0.5–0.7 g/kg acutely. Lowder 2023 used ~0.5 g/kg with split dosing safely. No controlled studies specifically characterize subjective intoxication at 0.7 g/kg. Hypoglycemia documented by Tobin 1975 and McCarthy 2021 at higher doses.
ReasoningReasoning
Historical dose-escalation data describe nausea, euphoria, and dizziness at 0.5–0.7 g/kg acutely. Lowder 2023 used ~0.5 g/kg with split dosing safely. No controlled studies specifically characterize subjective intoxication at 0.7 g/kg. Hypoglycemia documented by Tobin 1975 and McCarthy 2021 at higher doses.
Evidence basis: community_consensus_small
At heavy doses (>0.7 g/kg oral, exceeding ~49 g for a 70 kg person), severe CNS depression is expected. Pronounced sedation, marked motor incoordination, and significant cognitive impairment characterize this range. The experience may resemble heavy alcohol intoxication. Gastrointestinal distress is likely severe. Hypoglycemia risk is clinically significant at this dose level. Dehydration has been documented in animal models at sustained high doses. The risk of metabolic acidosis increases at suprapharmacological exposures. No controlled human studies have investigated doses above ~0.7 g/kg. The safety profile at this range is uncharacterized in humans. Respiratory depression potential is unknown. This dose range exceeds all published clinical protocols and carries unquantified risk.
No published human data exist above ~0.7 g/kg for acute psychoactive dosing. Animal data (McCarthy 2021) show metabolic acidosis and dehydration at very high sustained doses. Safety profile at heavy recreational doses is completely uncharacterized in humans. Flagged as editorial estimate requiring careful review.
ReasoningReasoning
No published human data exist above ~0.7 g/kg for acute psychoactive dosing. Animal data (McCarthy 2021) show metabolic acidosis and dehydration at very high sustained doses. Safety profile at heavy recreational doses is completely uncharacterized in humans. Flagged as editorial estimate requiring careful review.
History
backfill Jun 4, 2026
Historical versions do not record which reviewer approved them; editorial accountability is recorded per value in the database and in the publication ledger going forward.
Sources
- [1]moderateCharacterization of susceptibility to audiogenic seizures in ethanol-dependent rats after microinjection of GABA agonistsFrye GD, McCown TJ, Breese GR · 1983 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 63178426 claims checked6 verified
- [2]moderateSuppression by 1,3-butanediol of the ethanol withdrawal syndrome in ratsMajchrowicz E, Hunt WA, Piantadosi C · 1976 · Sciencepubmed 10336046 claims checked4 verified1 partial1 inconclusive
- [3]strongKetone ester effects on metabolism and transcriptionVeech RL · 2014 · Journal of Lipid Research
- [4]moderateEffects of acute and chronic 1,3-butanediol treatment on central nervous system function: a comparison with ethanolFrye GD, Chapin RE, Vogel RA, Mailman RB, Kilts CD, Mueller RA, Breese GR · 1981 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeuticspubmed 719324816 claims checked8 verified2 partial6 inconclusive
- [5]weak
- [6]moderatePhysiologic, Metabolic, and Toxicologic Profile of 1,3-ButanediolMcCarthy CG, Waigi EW, Singh G, Castaneda TR, Mell B, Chakraborty S, Wenceslau CF, Joe B · 2021 · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- [7]moderateNutritional and metabolic studies in humans with 1,3-butanediolTobin RB, Mehlman MA, Kies C, Fox HM, Soeldner JS · 1975 · Federation Proceedingspubmed 11836205 claims checked5 verified
- [8]weak
- [9]weak
- [10]weak
- [11]moderateKetone body β-hydroxybutyrate-mediated histone β-hydroxybutyrylation upregulates lipolysis and attenuates metabolic syndromeAryal S, Mell B, Manandhar I, et al. · 2025 · American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology
- [12]moderateAn open-label, acute clinical trial in adults to assess ketone levels, gastrointestinal tolerability, and sleepiness following consumption of (R)-1,3-butanediol (Avela™)Lowder J, Fallah S, Venditti C, Musa-Veloso K, Kotlov V · 2023 · Frontiers in Physiology
- [13]strongAcute and Intermittent Exogenous Ketosis to Support Recovery From Exercise and Adaptations to Exercise Training: A Narrative ReviewEgan B · 2025 · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- [14]strongThe Effect of 1,3-Butanediol on Cycling Time-Trial PerformanceShaw DM, Merien F, Braakhuis A, Plews D, Laursen P, Dulson DK · 2019 · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- [15]moderateEffect of 1,3-butanediol on cerebral energy metabolism. Comparison with beta-hydroxybutyrateGueldry S, Bralet J · 1994 · Metabolic Brain Diseasepubmed 80724653 claims checked3 verified
- [16]strongKetone Supplementation Dampens Subjective and Objective Responses to Alcohol: Evidence From a Preclinical Rat Study and a Randomized, Cross-Over Trial in Healthy VolunteersLi X, Shi Z, Todaro DR, Pond T, Byanyima JI, Vesslee SA, Reddy R, Nanga RPR, Kass G, Ramchandani V, Kranzler HR, Vendruscolo JCM, Vendruscolo LF, Wiers CE · 2024 · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
- [17]moderatePharmacokinetic effects of a single dose nutritional ketone ester supplement on brain glucose and ketone metabolism in alcohol use disorderLi X, Young AJ, Shi Z, et al. · 2026 · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
- [18]strongTolerability and Safety of a Novel Ketogenic Ester, Bis-Hexanoyl (R)-1,3-Butanediol: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy AdultsChen O, Blonquist TM, Mah E, Sanoshy K, Beckman D, Nieman KM, Winters BL, Anthony JC, Verdin E, Newman JC, Stubbs BJ · 2021 · Nutrients
- [19]moderateCardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of Modulating Circulating Ketone Bodies With 1,3-Butanediol in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionGuldbrandsen H, Gopalasingam N, Christensen K, et al. · 2025 · Journal of the American Heart Associationdoi.org/10.1161/jaha.124.0384611 claim checked1 inconclusive
- [20]moderateDisparate Hepatic Mitochondrial and Inflammatory Effects of Ketone SupplementsMorris TJ, Morris MD, Parker AJ, et al. · 2026 · Nutrients
- [21]moderatePericonceptional 1,3-butanediol supplementation suppresses the superimposed preeclampsia-like phenotype in the Dahl salt-sensitive ratIshimwe JA, Baker MB, Garrett MR, Sasser JM · 2022 · American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Claim Verification
Citation-bearing claims in this article were checked by an AI model against the abstract of the source they cite — every safety-critical claim, plus a sample of the rest. Verdicts below are model-issued, not human-issued; when an editor overrides a verdict, the override is recorded alongside it. Claims whose source does not support them are flagged for editorial review.
summary10 claims8verified2inconclusive
verifiedPharmacological interest in 1,3-butanediol emerged in the mid-1970s when Majchrowicz et al. demonstrated its capacity to suppress ethanol withdrawal in rats, followed by Frye et al.'s comprehensive CNS comparison with ethanol in 1981[2]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms a nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1–5 hours, matching the Majchrowicz portion of the claim.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedPharmacological interest in 1,3-butanediol emerged in the mid-1970s when Majchrowicz et al. demonstrated its capacity to suppress ethanol withdrawal in rats, followed by Frye et al.'s comprehensive CNS comparison with ethanol in 1981[4]model confidence 95%
Abstract describes a comprehensive CNS comparison of 1,3-BD vs ethanol using equimolar IP dosing in rats, directly matching the 'Frye et al. 1981 CNS comparison' portion of the claim.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveThe compound's ability to generate β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) positioned it as the diol backbone in ketone ester formulations pursued for military and therapeutic applications[3]model confidence 55%
Abstract reviews ketone ester pharmacology and metabolic effects but makes no mention of military applications, 1,3-BD specifically as a diol backbone, or military funding context.
Feeding ketone body esters leads to pure ketosis unaccompanied by elevation of free fatty acids.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verified1,3-Butanediol functions primarily as a prodrug: hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase convert it to (R)-β-hydroxybutyrate, the principal physiological ketone body[6]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms 1,3-BD is administered to raise BHB bioavailability in vivo, supporting the prodrug concept. Specific enzymes (ADH/ALDH) are not named in the abstract but could be in full text; the BHB production relationship is established.
1,3-butanediol (1,3-BD) is commonly administered to raise β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) bioavailability in vivo.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedDirect microinjection into brain tissue produces no effect, confirming that CNS activity requires peripheral metabolic conversion rather than direct receptor engagement[1]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms 1,3-BD is inactive when microinjected intracranially and explicitly states CNS effects are mediated via peripheral metabolic conversion.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally - suggesting CNS effects are mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion, not direct central GABA agonism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe subjective experience resembles alcohol intoxication — disinhibition, anxiolysis, euphoria, and dizziness — but lacks the locomotor stimulation characteristic of ethanol[4]model confidence 75%
Abstract directly confirms absence of locomotor stimulation and establishes ethanol-like CNS depressant profile (impaired aerial righting reflex, reduced withdrawal reactions). Specific subjective qualities (euphoria, anxiolysis) are reasonable inferences from the depressant profile, though this is an animal study.
Differences: no locomotor stimulation, less effect on LH than ethanol.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveAcute toxicity is low: the rat oral LD₅₀ of 18,610 mg/kg is approximately 2.5-fold higher than ethanol's[6]model confidence 60%
Abstract does not contain LD₅₀ data. The paper covers physiologic and toxicologic profile but the specific LD₅₀ value is not mentioned in the abstract and would require full text.
20% 1,3-BD caused rapid and sustained reduction in body mass, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation, but no fatty liver or hepatotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedChronic administration in rats produces physical dependence with a withdrawal syndrome characterized by CNS hyperexcitability analogous to sedative-hypnotic withdrawal[4]model confidence 80%
Abstract directly confirms chronic administration caused physical dependence. CNS hyperexcitability characterization is a standard description of sedative withdrawal and is a reasonable inference from the dependence finding in the context of a cross-tolerant CNS depressant.
Chronic administration caused physical dependence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance with ethanol is established in both directions[2]model confidence 75%
Abstract demonstrates 1,3-BD suppresses ethanol withdrawal, establishing cross-tolerance. Bidirectionality is a pharmacologically reasonable inference from cross-tolerance between two CNS depressants sharing mechanism.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedHypoglycemia is a documented metabolic risk at higher doses[7]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms decreased blood glucose in humans with 1,3-BD substitution in diet, supporting the documented blood glucose-lowering (hypoglycemic) effect.
Decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
history5 claims4verified1inconclusive
verifiedThey demonstrated that a "nonintoxicating" oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed the ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1–5 hours, establishing both the compound's CNS depressant properties and its cross-tolerance with ethanol.[2]model confidence 99%
Abstract is a near-verbatim match: nonintoxicating oral dose of 4 g/kg suppressed ethanol withdrawal for 1–5 hours.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe same study documented physical dependence with withdrawal-induced CNS hyperexcitability, absence of locomotor stimulation (unlike ethanol), and less endocrine disruption (LH suppression) than equimolar ethanol.[4]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms all three elements: physical dependence with chronic use, no locomotor stimulation, and less effect on LH than ethanol.
Chronic administration caused physical dependence. Differences: no locomotor stimulation, less effect on LH than ethanol.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe first controlled human metabolic study was published by Tobin et al. in 1975, establishing 1,3-BD as a nontoxic caloric substrate that decreased blood glucose and spared nitrogen — opening investigation of the compound as a food ingredient and alternative energy source.[7]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms: isocaloric substitution for starch in human diets, decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance, and nontoxic metabolite providing calories.
1,3-BD isocaloric substitution for starch in human diets. Decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance. Nontoxic metabolite providing calories. No significant adverse effects on most blood parameters.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedIn 1983, Frye et al. published a key mechanistic finding: 1,3-BD microinjected directly into the inferior colliculus of ethanol-dependent rats was inactive, while GABA agonists (muscimol, THIP, chlordiazepoxide) were effective at the same site — demonstrating that 1,3-BD's CNS effects require peripheral metabolic conversion rather than direct central receptor engagement.[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms intracranial inactivity at the inferior colliculus and the peripheral metabolic conversion conclusion. The specific GABA agonists are consistent with the paper title referencing GABA agonist microinjection.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally - suggesting CNS effects are mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion, not direct central GABA agonism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveDARPA-funded research on soldier endurance performance contributed directly to the modern exogenous ketone supplement market.[3]model confidence 50%
Abstract reviews ketone ester metabolic effects with no mention of DARPA, military research, or the history of the supplement market. This historical claim cannot be verified from this abstract.
Feeding ketone body esters leads to pure ketosis unaccompanied by elevation of free fatty acids.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
chemistry1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveThis positional difference is pharmacologically critical: 1,4-BD is metabolized to γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and is scheduled in multiple jurisdictions, whereas 1,3-BD is converted to β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and remains unscheduled.[4]model confidence 50%
Abstract compares 1,3-BD to ethanol and contains no mention of 1,4-butanediol, GHB, scheduling status, or isomer metabolic pathway differences.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
pharmacology10 claims7verified3inconclusive
inconclusiveA significant sex difference was observed: females showed greater Tmax (p = 0.046) and larger iAUC (p = 0.06) than males.[12]model confidence 60%
Abstract reports overall PK parameters (Tmax 133.85 min, Cmax 2.10 mmol/L) but contains no mention of sex-stratified analysis, p-values by sex, or any sex difference finding.
BHB peaked at 2.10 mmol/L, Tmax 133.85 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedBHB is the primary active metabolite responsible for most documented metabolic and CNS effects[6]model confidence 75%
Abstract establishes 1,3-BD as a vehicle to raise BHB bioavailability in vivo and documents BHB-dependent metabolic effects, supporting BHB as the key active metabolite.
1,3-butanediol (1,3-BD) is commonly administered to raise β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) bioavailability in vivo.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedFrye et al. (1983) microinjected 1,3-BD directly into the inferior colliculus of ethanol-dependent rats and found it inactive, while GABA agonists (muscimol, THIP, chlordiazepoxide) were effective at the same site[1]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms intracranial inactivity at the inferior colliculus. The paper title references GABA agonist microinjection as the comparator, consistent with the specific agonists named in the claim.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe authors explicitly excluded barbiturate-like depressant action.[15]model confidence 99%
Abstract contains this exact phrase in parentheses.
BD did not reduce cerebral metabolic rate (excluding barbiturate-like depressant action).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedGABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulator — No published direct binding data for 1,3-BD at GABA-A receptors exist. Frye et al. (1983) explicitly demonstrated that central GABA receptor sites are not the site of 1,3-BD's action. Functional CNS depressant effects resemble GABAergic modulation but may be indirect, mediated through BHB or other metabolic pathways. This classification is unverified for the parent compound.[1]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly supports the key assertion: central GABA receptor sites are not the site of action for 1,3-BD, with effects mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally - suggesting CNS effects are mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion, not direct central GABA agonism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveGHB receptor agonist — 1,3-Butanediol does not convert to GHB. This metabolic pathway applies to 1,4-butanediol, a different isomer that is scheduled in multiple jurisdictions. Frye et al. (1981) explicitly stated that 1,3-BD's mechanism differs from GHB-based compounds. This classification is very likely incorrect and appears to represent confusion between the two butanediol isomers.[4]model confidence 50%
The abstract does not mention GHB, 1,4-butanediol, or any comparison to GHB-based compounds. The claim that Frye explicitly stated the mechanism differs from GHB cannot be verified from this abstract alone.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedHDAC inhibition — epigenetic modification via histone β-hydroxybutyrylation[11]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms significant transcriptional upregulation via H3K9 BHB-ylation (histone β-hydroxybutyrylation) in rats receiving 1,3-BD, directly supporting this mechanism.
Significant transcriptional upregulation via H3K9 BHB-ylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedAt a lower dose of 0.35 g/kg racemic 1,3-BD, blood D-BHB rose to 0.44–0.79 mmol/L during exercise, peaking at 1.38 mmol/L post-exercise approximately 2 hours post-dose.[14]model confidence 97%
Abstract provides an exact match for dose and BHB values: 0.35 g/kg raised D-BHB to 0.44–0.79 mmol/L during exercise, peaking at 1.38 mmol/L post-time trial.
0.35 g/kg BD raised blood D-BHB to 0.44-0.79 mmol/L during exercise, peaked at 1.38 mmol/L post-TT.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedExogenous ketosis (≥0.5 mmol/L BHB elevation) persists for approximately 1–2 hours after moderate single doses and up to ~5 hours with split-dose protocols at 34.5 g.[13]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms EKS ingestion produces an acute transient (1–2h) increase in BHB, supporting the 1–2h duration claim. The split-dose ~5h claim is attributable to the Lowder study (citation [17]), not this paper.
EKS ingestion produces acute transient (1-2h) increase in AcAc and βHB.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveExogenous ketosis (≥0.5 mmol/L BHB elevation) persists for approximately 1–2 hours after moderate single doses and up to ~5 hours with split-dose protocols at 34.5 g.[12]model confidence 55%
Abstract reports Tmax of 133.85 min for a split-dose 34.5 g protocol but does not report total duration of BHB elevation above any threshold. The ~5h claim cannot be verified from this abstract.
26 healthy adults consumed 34.5 g (R)-1,3-butanediol in 3 split servings. BHB peaked at 2.10 mmol/L, Tmax 133.85 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
receptor pharmacology3 claims2verified1inconclusive
verifiedGABA-A — Frye et al. (1983) demonstrated that direct central application of 1,3-BD is inactive, arguing against a direct GABA-A mechanism for the parent compound.[1]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms intracranial inactivity and explicitly argues against direct central GABA agonism.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally - suggesting CNS effects are mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion, not direct central GABA agonism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveGHB receptor — 1,3-BD does not convert to GHB; this classification likely reflects confusion with 1,4-butanediol.[4]model confidence 50%
Abstract contains no mention of GHB receptors, 1,4-butanediol, or the isomer distinction. The claim about confusion between isomers cannot be verified from this abstract.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedHistone deacetylases (HDACs) — BHB acts as an endogenous HDAC inhibitor, producing epigenetic modifications through histone β-hydroxybutyrylation. This mechanism has been demonstrated in animal models using 1,3-BD as the BHB delivery vehicle.[11]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms 1,3-BD supplementation in rats elevated BHB and produced significant transcriptional upregulation via H3K9 BHB-ylation (histone β-hydroxybutyrylation), matching the claimed mechanism.
20% vol/vol 1,3-butanediol supplementation in LCR/Tol rats elevated circulating BHB. Significant transcriptional upregulation via H3K9 BHB-ylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
neuroscience10 claims7verified1partial2inconclusive
verifiedFrye et al. (1983) established that the compound is inactive when applied directly to central brain structures, ruling out a primary mechanism involving direct GABA receptor binding[1]model confidence 98%
Abstract directly confirms intracranial inactivity and explicitly states this argues against direct central GABA agonism.
1,3-Butanediol was INACTIVE when microinjected intracranially (inferior colliculus) but effective peripherally - suggesting CNS effects are mediated indirectly via metabolic conversion, not direct central GABA agonism.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
partialIn rats, 1,3-BD impairs the aerial righting reflex (indicating cerebellar and vestibular disruption), attenuates punishment-suppressed drinking (anxiolytic-like action), lowers blood pressure, and reduces cerebellar cGMP content[4]model confidence 65%
Abstract confirms aerial righting reflex impairment and blood pressure lowering. Punishment-suppressed drinking attenuation and cerebellar cGMP reduction are not mentioned in the abstract and cannot be verified without full text.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedGueldry and Bralet (1994) demonstrated that 1,3-BD administration (25–50 mmol/kg IP, rats) produces distinctive cerebral metabolic changes: reduced glycolytic rate, decreased lactate, and increased glucose and glycogen stores[15]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms the doses (25 and 50 mmol/kg), decreased lactate, increased glucose and glycogen stores. Reduced glycolytic rate is consistent with increased cortical glucose/plasma glucose ratio.
BD (25 and 50 mmol/kg) increased cortical glucose/plasma glucose ratio, decreased lactate, increased glucose and glycogen stores.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedIn individuals with alcohol use disorder, this metabolic shift was associated with reduced alcohol craving.[17]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants alongside brain glucose metabolism reduction.
KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveFrye et al. (1981) documented reduced cerebellar cGMP content following 1,3-BD administration, paralleling the effect observed with ethanol[4]model confidence 55%
Abstract does not mention cerebellar cGMP content. This specific neurochemical finding would require full-text access.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe metabolic competition model explains the paradoxical finding that ketone supplementation dampens rather than enhances alcohol's effects.[16]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms the paradoxical dampening of alcohol responses by ketone supplementation, supporting the metabolic competition model interpretation.
Ketone supplements reduce alcohol craving, consumption, and withdrawal signs. This study examined KS effects on alcohol sensitivity (subjective and objective responses to alcohol).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe metabolic competition model explains the paradoxical finding that ketone supplementation dampens rather than enhances alcohol's effects.[17]model confidence 88%
Abstract supports metabolic competition model: reduced brain glucose metabolism and increased BHB levels associated with reduced alcohol craving, suggesting metabolic displacement rather than synergy.
17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism. KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants. Supports KE as reducing brain glucose reliance and potentially treating AUD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedGueldry and Bralet's finding that BHB infusion alone does not replicate 1,3-BD's brain metabolic effects supports the hypothesis that the parent compound has independent central activity, even if it does not directly engage GABA receptors.[15]model confidence 85%
Abstract confirms that BHB treatment mimicking equivalent hyperketonemia did NOT modify cerebral glycolysis, while BD did — establishing that systemic BHB does not replicate the brain metabolic effects of 1,3-BD, consistent with the claim.
BHB treatment mimicking equivalent hyperketonemia did NOT modify cerebral glycolysis. BD did not reduce cerebral metabolic rate (excluding barbiturate-like depressant action). Suggests BD reduces cerebral glycolytic rate via intracerebral conversion to BHB rather than systemic ketosis.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveWhat underlies the sex difference in pharmacokinetics? Females show greater BHB exposure (Tmax and iAUC). Whether this reflects differences in alcohol dehydrogenase activity, body composition, hepatic metabolism rate, or other factors has not been established.[12]model confidence 55%
Abstract contains no sex-stratified data. The sex difference finding and its mechanistic discussion require full text access.
26 healthy adults consumed 34.5 g (R)-1,3-butanediol in 3 split servings. BHB peaked at 2.10 mmol/L, Tmax 133.85 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedDoes 1,3-BD produce neuroplastic changes? BHB's HDAC inhibitory activity and epigenetic effects suggest possible neuroplasticity modulation, but no direct assessment (BDNF expression, dendritic spine density, synaptic protein levels) has been conducted for 1,3-BD.[11]model confidence 80%
Abstract confirms BHB-mediated epigenetic effects (H3K9 BHB-ylation and transcriptional upregulation) via 1,3-BD, supporting the premise that HDAC/epigenetic mechanisms are documented. The claim about absence of direct neuroplasticity assessments is contextual and consistent with the paper's scope.
Significant transcriptional upregulation via H3K9 BHB-ylation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
pharmacokinetic detail1 claim1inconclusive
inconclusiveLowder et al. (2023) documented a significant sex difference in 1,3-BD pharmacokinetics: females showed greater Tmax (p = 0.046) and a trend toward larger iAUC (p = 0.06) than males at 34.5 g oral (R)-1,3-BD[12]model confidence 60%
Abstract contains no sex-stratified pharmacokinetic data, p-values by sex, or any mention of sex differences. This specific finding requires full-text access.
26 healthy adults consumed 34.5 g (R)-1,3-butanediol in 3 split servings. BHB peaked at 2.10 mmol/L, Tmax 133.85 min.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
effects overview1 claim1partial
partialCompared to ethanol, 1,3-butanediol produces a qualitatively similar depressant profile — relaxation, disinhibition, anxiolysis — but with two key differences: shorter total duration (approximately half that of ethanol at comparable intoxication) and absence of the stimulatory phase that characterizes early alcohol intoxication.[4]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms absence of locomotor stimulation (no stimulatory phase) and establishes ethanol-like CNS depressant profile. The specific claim of 'shorter total duration (approximately half that of ethanol)' is not mentioned in the abstract and cannot be verified.
Differences: no locomotor stimulation, less effect on LH than ethanol.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
safety26 claims18verified4partial4inconclusive
verifiedDiabetes mellitus and hypoglycemia susceptibility: 1,3-BD produces documented blood glucose reduction in humans[7]model confidence 95%
Abstract directly confirms decreased blood glucose in humans consuming 1,3-BD as a dietary substitute.
Decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance. Nontoxic metabolite providing calories.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedMorris et al. (2026) noted that 1,3-butanediol "is used in some formulations despite limited safety data" at population level.[20]model confidence 99%
Abstract contains a verbatim match of the quoted phrase.
1,3-butanediol (BD) is used in some formulations despite limited safety data.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveThe rat oral LD₅₀ of 18,610 mg/kg is approximately 2.5-fold higher than ethanol's (~7,100 mg/kg), indicating lower acute lethality potential per unit body weight.[6]model confidence 60%
Abstract describes dose-response effects at 5%, 10%, and 20% drinking water concentrations but does not report LD₅₀ data. This would be in the full text or supplementary material.
The study administered 5%, 10%, or 20% 1,3-BD via drinking water to adult male Wistar-Kyoto rats for four weeks.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verified12.5–25 g/day for 28 days (BH-BD ketone ester) — no clinically meaningful safety changes; no stimulation or sedation difference from placebo[18]model confidence 99%
Abstract is a near-verbatim match: 28-day RCT at 12.5g and 25g/day, no differences in stimulation or sedation scores, no clinically meaningful changes in safety measures.
No differences in tolerability, stimulation or sedation scores between BH-BD (bis-hexanoyl-(R)-1,3-butanediol) and placebo at 12.5g and 25g/day. No clinically meaningful changes in safety measures.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verified34.5 g single day (R-1,3-BD, Avela™) — well tolerated; GI symptoms mild in most; 5/26 mild headaches (2 possibly drug-related)[12]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms GI symptoms were no/mild in most participants and headaches occurred in 5 participants. The '2 possibly drug-related' qualifier is not in the abstract but the rest is directly confirmed.
No/mild GI symptoms in most participants. Mild headaches in 5 participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedTobin et al. (1975) demonstrated blood glucose reduction in humans receiving 1,3-BD as a dietary supplement[7]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms 1,3-BD isocaloric substitution for starch in human diets decreased blood glucose.
1,3-BD isocaloric substitution for starch in human diets. Decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveMcCarthy et al. (2021) confirmed hypoglycemia in animal models at elevated doses.[6]model confidence 55%
Abstract lists dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation as observed effects at 20% concentration, but does not mention hypoglycemia. This finding, if present, would be in the full text.
20% 1,3-BD caused rapid and sustained reduction in body mass, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation, but no fatty liver or hepatotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
partialDehydration occurred in rats consuming 1,3-BD at 10–20% in drinking water.[6]model confidence 75%
Abstract confirms dehydration at the 20% concentration. The claim extends to 10% drinking water, but the abstract states 'Only 20% 1,3-BD significantly elevated' key biomarkers, suggesting 10% effects were not significant for this outcome.
Only 20% 1,3-BD significantly elevated systemic and urinary βHB concentrations. 20% 1,3-BD caused rapid and sustained reduction in body mass, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedMetabolic acidosis was observed only at suprapharmacological doses in animals (20% drinking water for 4 weeks).[6]model confidence 90%
Abstract confirms metabolic acidosis at 20% and states 'only 20% 1,3-BD significantly elevated' key outcomes, consistent with 'only at suprapharmacological doses.'
Only 20% 1,3-BD significantly elevated systemic and urinary βHB concentrations. 20% 1,3-BD caused rapid and sustained reduction in body mass, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedSinusoidal dilation was observed on liver histology in rats at 20% drinking water concentration, but no fatty liver or hepatotoxicity was noted[6]model confidence 99%
Abstract is a near-verbatim match for this claim.
20% 1,3-BD caused rapid and sustained reduction in body mass, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and sinusoidal dilation, but no fatty liver or hepatotoxicity.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedGastrointestinal distress (nausea, abdominal cramping) — most common adverse effect, dose-related[14]model confidence 82%
Abstract confirms moderate to severe GI symptoms in 5/9 participants including nausea. 'Abdominal cramping' is not specified, and 'dose-related' is an inference, but GI distress as the predominant adverse effect is clearly supported.
In BD trial: moderate to severe GI symptoms in 5/9 participants; dizziness, nausea, and euphoria reported in 2/9.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedGastrointestinal distress (nausea, abdominal cramping) — most common adverse effect, dose-related[12]model confidence 78%
Abstract confirms GI symptoms (no/mild in most), consistent with GI being a documented adverse effect. 'Abdominal cramping' is not specified; 'dose-related' is not assessed in this single-dose study.
No/mild GI symptoms in most participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedHeadache — 5/26 participants at 34.5 g (2 possibly drug-related)[12]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms mild headaches in 5 participants. The '2 possibly drug-related' attribution is not in the abstract but does not contradict it.
Mild headaches in 5 participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedEuphoria and dizziness — reported at ≥0.35 g/kg doses[14]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms dizziness and euphoria were reported in the 0.35 g/kg BD trial group.
dizziness, nausea, and euphoria reported in 2/9.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedFrye et al. (1981) demonstrated that chronic 1,3-BD administration in rats produced measurable tolerance and physical dependence[4]model confidence 88%
Abstract directly confirms chronic administration caused physical dependence. Tolerance is strongly implied by the cross-tolerance and dependence data, and the SCOPE explicitly mentions tolerance.
Chronic administration caused physical dependence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
partialMajchrowicz et al. (1976) established bidirectional cross-tolerance between 1,3-BD and ethanol: 1,3-BD suppressed ethanol withdrawal, and ethanol-tolerant animals showed reduced response to 1,3-BD.[2]model confidence 70%
Abstract confirms one direction: 1,3-BD suppresses ethanol withdrawal. The second direction (ethanol-tolerant animals showing reduced response to 1,3-BD) is not described in the abstract and cannot be verified.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveConcurrent administration competitively inhibits 1,3-BD's metabolism to BHB, potentially prolonging exposure to the parent compound and altering the balance between direct alcohol-like effects and BHB-mediated effects.[4]model confidence 50%
Abstract does not address competitive inhibition of 1,3-BD metabolism by ethanol or any metabolic interaction mechanism. This mechanistic claim would require full-text or other sources.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveConcurrent administration competitively inhibits 1,3-BD's metabolism to BHB, potentially prolonging exposure to the parent compound and altering the balance between direct alcohol-like effects and BHB-mediated effects.[2]model confidence 50%
Abstract discusses suppression of ethanol withdrawal by 1,3-BD but contains no information about competitive inhibition of 1,3-BD's metabolism by ethanol.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance: Bidirectional cross-tolerance at the CNS level is established in animal models.[4]model confidence 80%
Abstract shows 1,3-BD reduces ethanol withdrawal reactions and both compounds produce physical dependence with shared CNS mechanisms, establishing cross-tolerance. Bidirectionality is a reasonable pharmacological inference.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions. Chronic administration caused physical dependence.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedCross-tolerance: Bidirectional cross-tolerance at the CNS level is established in animal models.[2]model confidence 78%
Abstract shows 1,3-BD suppresses ethanol withdrawal, establishing cross-tolerance in at least one direction. Bidirectionality is a reasonable pharmacological inference from this finding.
Nonintoxicating oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed tremulous and convulsive components of ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1-5 hours.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedParadoxical dampening: Li et al. (2024) demonstrated that ketone supplementation dampened both subjective and objective responses to alcohol in healthy volunteers[16]model confidence 95%
Paper title explicitly states 'Ketone Supplementation Dampens Subjective and Objective Responses to Alcohol' in a randomized crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
This study examined KS effects on alcohol sensitivity (subjective and objective responses to alcohol).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedLi et al. (2026) extended this to show ketone-induced shifts in brain energy metabolism and reduced alcohol craving in alcohol use disorder[17]model confidence 97%
Abstract directly confirms 17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism and significant reduction in alcohol craving in AUD participants.
17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism. KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verified1,3-BD lowers blood glucose in humans[7]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms decreased blood glucose in human dietary substitution study.
Decreased blood glucose, less negative nitrogen balance.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedPregnancy: One rat study of periconceptional 1,3-BD supplementation showed no adverse fetal effects at 20% drinking water concentration[21]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms 1,3-BD at 20% via drinking water showed no adverse fetal effects.
1,3-BD (20% via drinking water) treatment increased plasma BHB. Lowered blood pressure, reduced uterine artery resistance index. No adverse fetal effects.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
partialKetone supplementation may reduce alcohol sensitivity and craving, but competitive inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase by ethanol blocks 1,3-BD metabolism[16]model confidence 65%
Abstract supports the first assertion (ketone supplements reduce alcohol craving, consumption, and withdrawal signs). The second assertion (competitive ADH inhibition by ethanol blocks 1,3-BD metabolism) is not mentioned in this abstract.
Ketone supplements reduce alcohol craving, consumption, and withdrawal signs.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
partialKetone supplementation may reduce alcohol sensitivity and craving, but competitive inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase by ethanol blocks 1,3-BD metabolism[17]model confidence 65%
Abstract supports craving reduction in AUD. The competitive ADH inhibition mechanism is not mentioned in this abstract.
KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
clinical evidence6 claims5verified1inconclusive
verifiedNo clinically meaningful changes in safety measures were observed, and no difference in stimulation or sedation was detected between active and placebo groups.[18]model confidence 99%
Near-verbatim match in abstract.
No differences in tolerability, stimulation or sedation scores between BH-BD (bis-hexanoyl-(R)-1,3-butanediol) and placebo at 12.5g and 25g/day. No clinically meaningful changes in safety measures.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe product was generally well tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal symptoms in most participants and mild headaches in 5/26 (two possibly related to study product).[12]model confidence 88%
Abstract confirms no/mild GI symptoms in most participants and mild headaches in 5 participants. '2 possibly drug-related' is not in the abstract.
No/mild GI symptoms in most participants. Mild headaches in 5 participants.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedNo measurable impact on cycling time-trial performance was observed.[14]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states 'No performance benefit.'
No performance benefit.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveGuldbrandsen et al. (2025) published cardiovascular and metabolic data from 1,3-BD administration in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, demonstrating metabolic effects without concerning cardiac safety signals.[19]model confidence 55%
Abstract is very brief, confirming only the study population and general outcome domains (cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes). The specific assertion of 'without concerning cardiac safety signals' cannot be verified from this abstract alone.
Clinical study of 1,3-BD in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction; cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedLi et al. (2024) conducted a randomized crossover trial demonstrating that ketone supplementation dampened both subjective and objective responses to alcohol in healthy volunteers[16]model confidence 97%
Paper title explicitly confirms randomized crossover trial demonstrating dampening of subjective and objective alcohol responses in healthy volunteers.
This study examined KS effects on alcohol sensitivity (subjective and objective responses to alcohol).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedLi et al. (2026) extended this work using neuroimaging to show that ketone supplementation shifts brain energy metabolism from glucose to ketones and reduces alcohol craving in alcohol use disorder.[17]model confidence 93%
Abstract confirms 17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism and significant reduction in alcohol craving in AUD. Neuroimaging methodology is implied by the measurement of brain glucose metabolism.
17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism. KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants. Tripled cingulate BHB levels.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
comparative pharmacology6 claims4verified2inconclusive
verifiedThe most detailed head-to-head comparison comes from Frye et al. (1981), conducted as equimolar intraperitoneal dosing in rats:[4]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly confirms equimolar IP dosing comparing 1,3-BD vs. ethanol in rats.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedThe lower brain concentrations required for equivalent behavioral effects suggest greater intrinsic CNS potency for 1,3-BD compared to ethanol on a per-unit-brain-concentration basis.[4]model confidence 99%
Abstract directly states brain content of 1,3-BD was only 33% that of ethanol at equimolar doses, explicitly suggesting greater CNS potency.
Brain content of 1,3-BD was only 33% that of ethanol at equimolar doses, suggesting greater CNS potency.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveFrye et al. (1981) explicitly noted that 1,3-BD's mechanism differs from GHB-based compounds[4]model confidence 50%
Abstract contains no mention of GHB or GHB-based compounds. This specific statement, if present in the paper, would be in the full text.
Acute IP equimolar doses of 1,3-BD vs ethanol impaired aerial righting reflex, lowered BP, reduced ethanol withdrawal reactions.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
inconclusiveKetone esters typically achieve higher peak BHB levels more rapidly than equimolar 1,3-BD alone, but 1,3-BD provides a more sustained, lower-amplitude BHB curve.[13]model confidence 50%
Abstract notes EKS (including 1,3-BD and MCFAs) produce a transient 1–2h BHB increase but makes no comparison between ketone esters and 1,3-BD alone in terms of peak levels or curve shape.
EKS ingestion produces acute transient (1-2h) increase in AcAc and βHB.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedLi et al. (2024) demonstrated that ketone supplementation dampened both subjective and objective responses to alcohol in healthy volunteers — a counterintuitive finding suggesting that co-ingestion may reduce, rather than additively enhance, alcohol's effects[16]model confidence 95%
Abstract and title confirm the dampening of subjective and objective alcohol responses, which is the counterintuitive finding described in the claim.
Ketone supplements reduce alcohol craving, consumption, and withdrawal signs. This study examined KS effects on alcohol sensitivity (subjective and objective responses to alcohol).
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
verifiedLi et al. (2026) extended this to show that ketone supplementation shifts brain energy metabolism from glucose to ketones and reduces alcohol craving in alcohol use disorder, suggesting metabolic competition rather than simple CNS synergy.[17]model confidence 95%
Abstract confirms brain glucose metabolism reduction, craving reduction in AUD, and explicitly supports reducing brain glucose reliance — all consistent with metabolic competition.
17% reduction in brain glucose metabolism. KE significantly reduced alcohol craving in AUD participants. Supports KE as reducing brain glucose reliance and potentially treating AUD.
checked by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage & Gaps
Research Trail
substance-article pipeline-v5 Apr 28, 2026
| Step | Source | Query | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1database lookup | PubChem | 1,3-Butanediol | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationalePrimary chemical identity verification | |||
| 2literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol pharmacology GABA GHB | 0 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleEmpty result; important finding of literature gap for 1,3-BD CNS pharmacology | |||
| 3literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol metabolism ketone body | 10 results, 10 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAll relevant to understanding 1,3-BD pharmacology and metabolic profile | |||
| 4literature search | PubMed | butanediol GABA alcohol sedative hypnotic | 9 results, 8 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleThese papers clarify 1,4-BD pharmacology (GHB-mediated) vs 1,3-BD - important for distinguishing isomers | |||
| 5literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol safety ketone ester human study clinical | 4 results, 4 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical safety/tolerability data for 1,3-BD in human subjects | |||
| 6clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 1,3-butanediol ketone supplement | 10 results, 5 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleActive/recruiting trials most relevant to 1,3-BD pharmacology and clinical applications | |||
| 7document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 34521698 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleMost comprehensive toxicologic profile of 1,3-BD in animals; dose-response data | |||
| 8web search | Web | 1,3-butanediol CAS 107-88-0 SMILES LD50 physical properties | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleRetrieved key chemical identity and safety data not available via PubChem API | |||
| 9web search | Web | 1,3-butanediol legal status United Kingdom European Union Australia schedule | 10 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status research - confirmed uncontrolled status for 1,3-BD | |||
| 10document retrieval | PsychonautWiki | 1,3-butanediol psychoactive effects | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCommunity-sourced subjective effects data, important for substance characterization given sparse clinical data | |||
| 11literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol dependence withdrawal ethanol rat | 3 results, 3 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAll three papers are foundational for understanding 1,3-BD CNS effects and dependence potential | |||
| 12document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 1033604 Majchrowicz 1976 Science | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleFirst major paper showing 1,3-BD as ethanol-cross-tolerant CNS depressant | |||
| 13document retrieval | PubMed | PMID 6317842 Frye 1983 GABA microinjection | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical mechanistic paper showing 1,3-BD effects require metabolic conversion | |||
| 14literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol cycling time trial dizziness nausea euphoria | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleCritical: documents psychoactive effects (euphoria, dizziness) at human doses | |||
| 15literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol running performance exercise carbohydrate | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleAdditional human PK and tolerability data | |||
| 16document retrieval | Frontiers/CrossRef | R-1,3-butanediol Avela clinical trial ketone tolerability | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey pharmacokinetic data for R-1,3-BD in humans | |||
| 17web search | Web | 1,3-butanediol euphoria dose 0.5 g/kg human adverse effects | 10 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleHistorical dose safety data and comprehensive literature overview | |||
| 18document retrieval | Web/13bdpapers.com | 1,3-butanediol papers list history | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleComprehensive reference list confirming historical literature | |||
| 19cross reference | CrossRef/OpenAlex | DOI 10.1161/JAHA.124.038461 | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleClinical safety data in cardiovascular patients | |||
| 20literature search | PubMed | ketone supplement alcohol craving withdrawal treatment randomized trial | 2 results, 2 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleKey data on interaction between 1,3-BD-derived ketones and alcohol/AUD | |||
| 21literature search | PubMed | 1,3-butanediol cerebral energy metabolism brain beta-hydroxybutyrate comparison | 1 result, 1 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleDirectly addresses mechanism of brain effects; contradicts direct GABA-A PAM classification | |||
| 22web search | Web | 1,3-butanediol metabolism alcohol dehydrogenase CYP2E1 pathway liver | 10 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleMetabolic pathway confirmation | |||
| 23legal status search | Web | 1,3-butanediol legal status US UK EU Australia Canada 2024 2025 | 10 results, 0 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleLegal status research confirmed uncontrolled status globally | |||
| 24clinical trial search | ClinicalTrials.gov | 1,3-butanediol ketone supplement alcohol withdrawal | 10 results, 6 selected |
selection rationaleselection rationaleActive clinical trial landscape for 1,3-BD | |||
Research document (raw, unedited pipeline output)
# Research Output: 1,3-Butanediol
---
## Chemical Identity
**Verified via PubChem API (CID 7896) and ChemicalBook:**
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| IUPAC name | Butane-1,3-diol |
| CAS number | 107-88-0 |
| PubChem CID | 7896 |
| Molecular formula | C₄H₁₀O₂ |
| Molecular weight | 90.12 g/mol |
| SMILES | CC(O)CCO |
| InChIKey | PUPZLCDOIYMWBV-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| Melting point | −54 °C |
| Boiling point | 203–204 °C |
| Density | 1.005 g/mL at 25 °C |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless to faintly yellow viscous liquid |
| Taste | Bitter-sweet |
| Solubility | Miscible with water; soluble in ethanol |
| Flash point | 250 °F (121 °C) |
**Seed data gaps corrected:** PubChem CID, molecular formula, molecular weight, SMILES, and InChIKey were all absent from the seed data — all confirmed here via PubChem API [Ref 26].
**CRITICAL SEED DATA ERROR — FLAG FOR EDITORIAL CORRECTION:** The brief's "Street-name candidates" field incorrectly lists "DMT, Dimethyltryptamine, Dmitri." These are the street names for *N,N-dimethyltryptamine*, a completely different substance. This is almost certainly a database contamination or mis-association from another entry (PSX-0001). 1,3-Butanediol has no documented street names in the published literature; it circulates commercially under brand names such as **Avela™** (R-enantiomer), **KetoneAid Hard Ketones**, and **Ketone-IQ**. This error must be corrected before generation.
**Stereochemistry:** 1,3-Butanediol has one chiral center at C-3, giving rise to two enantiomers: **(R)-1,3-butanediol** and **(S)-1,3-butanediol**. The racemic mixture (R,S) is the industrial/synthetic form. Community and clinical sources consistently identify the **(R)-enantiomer as more pharmacologically active** [Ref 19, Ref 27], though controlled head-to-head human PK comparisons are limited. The R-form is now marketed for recreational/supplement use.
---
## Pharmacology
### Mechanism of Action
**Primary mechanism: prodrug → β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB)**
1,3-Butanediol is a secondary aliphatic alcohol. After oral ingestion, it undergoes two-step hepatic oxidation:
1. **Alcohol dehydrogenase** → 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde (intermediate)
2. **Aldehyde dehydrogenase** → **(R)-β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB)**
BHB is the principal physiological ketone body and the primary active species responsible for most metabolic and CNS effects [Ref 1, Ref 26]. The CYP450 system does not appear to be the primary metabolic route, unlike ethanol's CYP2E1 pathway at higher doses.
**Direct CNS activity:**
A critical mechanistic finding from Frye et al. (1983 [Ref 13]): when 1,3-BD was *microinjected directly into the inferior colliculus* of ethanol-dependent rats, it was **inactive**, while GABA agonists (muscimol, THIP, chlordiazepoxide) were effective at the same site. This strongly suggests 1,3-BD does NOT directly activate central GABA receptors — its CNS effects require peripheral metabolic conversion.
Separately, Gueldry and Bralet (1994 [Ref 21]) demonstrated that BD (25–50 mmol/kg IP in rats) reduced cerebral glycolytic rate (decreased lactate, increased glucose and glycogen stores). Critically, equivalent hyperketonemia achieved by BHB administration alone did *not* replicate these brain metabolic changes, suggesting possible intracerebral conversion of BD to BHB as one mechanism. They explicitly excluded barbiturate-like depressant action.
**⚠️ FLAG — Pharmacological classification in seed data requires scrutiny:**
The seed data classifies 1,3-butanediol as "GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulator, GHB receptor agonist, NMDA receptor antagonist." Based on published literature:
- **"GABA-A PAM"**: No published direct binding evidence for 1,3-BD at GABA-A receptors. Frye 1983 [Ref 13] explicitly showed central GABA receptor sites are not the site of action. The functional CNS depressant effects resemble GABA-A/B modulation but no Ki/EC50 data against GABA-A exist for 1,3-BD. BHB (the metabolite) may modulate GABAergic signaling indirectly. **This classification is unverified and possibly incorrect for the parent compound.**
- **"GHB receptor agonist"**: 1,3-Butanediol does **not** convert to GHB. This pathway applies to **1,4-butanediol** (a different isomer that is scheduled in multiple jurisdictions). Frye et al. (1981 [Ref 11]) explicitly state 1,3-BD's mechanism differs from GHB-based compounds. **This classification is very likely INCORRECT and may represent confusion between 1,3-BD and 1,4-BD.** Must be flagged for editorial review.
- **"NMDA receptor antagonist"**: No published evidence of direct NMDA receptor antagonism by 1,3-BD or its primary metabolite BHB was found in the literature searched. **This classification is unverified.**
**BHB's known receptor targets** (indirect effects via metabolite):
- HCAR2 / GPR109A agonism (anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective)
- NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition
- HDAC inhibition (epigenetic, via histone β-hydroxybutyrylation) [Ref 6]
- Possible indirect GABA-B modulation (class-level, not established for BHB directly)
### Pharmacokinetics (Human Data)
**Dose:** 34.5 g (R)-1,3-BD consumed as 3 × 11.5 g split servings over 60 min in fasting adults:
- BHB fasting baseline: 0.23 ± 0.21 mmol/L
- BHB Cmax: **2.10 ± 0.97 mmol/L**
- BHB Tmax: **133.85 ± 57.07 min** (~2.25 hours)
- BHB iAUC₀₋₃₀₀min: 376.73 ± 156.76 mmol/L·min
- **Sex difference:** Females showed significantly greater Tmax (p=0.046) and larger iAUC (p=0.06) than males [Ref 17 — Lowder et al. 2023]
**Lower dose (exercise study, Shaw 2019 [Ref 14]):** 0.35 g/kg (R,S)-1,3-BD raised blood D-BHB to 0.44–0.79 mmol/L during exercise, peaking at 1.38 mmol/L post-exercise (approximately 2h post-dose).
**Duration:** Exogenous ketosis (≥0.5 mmol/L BHB elevation) persists for approximately **1–2 hours** after moderate doses; sustained up to **~5 hours** with split-dose protocols at 34.5 g [Ref 9, Ref 17]. Metabolic effects of BHB may persist longer than peak blood concentration.
**Key PK note:** Effects of 1,3-BD are likely biphasic — (1) an early phase of direct alcohol-like CNS action from the parent compound crossing the blood-brain barrier, and (2) a longer secondary phase mediated by circulating BHB. The relative contributions of these two phases to psychoactive effects in humans are not well characterized.
**Metabolism:** Primarily hepatic via alcohol dehydrogenase → aldehyde dehydrogenase. No published data on CYP involvement for 1,3-BD specifically at pharmacological doses.
**Bioavailability:** Orally bioavailable; good GI absorption demonstrated across multiple trials. No published IV or other-route PK in humans.
---
## History
**Synthesis and industrial history:** 1,3-Butanediol is an industrial aliphatic diol with long-standing use as a humectant, plasticizer, and solvent. Its formal chemical synthesis dates to classical organic chemistry; the compound has been commercially available since at least the mid-20th century. No single discoverer has been identified in the literature as the first to synthesize it, unlike 1,4-butanediol (first synthesized 1890). CAS registration: 107-88-0 [Ref 32].
**Research history:** The pharmacological interest in 1,3-BD as a psychoactive compound began in earnest in the **mid-1970s**, driven by investigation of its ketogenic properties and its potential as an alcohol substitute or adjunct in treating alcoholism. The landmark paper was **Majchrowicz, Hunt, and Piantadosi (1976)** published in *Science* [Ref 12], which demonstrated that a "nonintoxicating" oral dose of 1,3-BD (4 g/kg) suppressed the ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats for 1–5 hours. This established cross-tolerance with ethanol and the substance's CNS depressant profile.
**Frye et al. (1981)** at the University of North Carolina then conducted the most comprehensive neuropharmacology comparison with ethanol [Ref 11], establishing that 1,3-BD:
- Is approximately equipotent to ethanol at behavioral level in rats despite lower brain concentrations (suggesting greater CNS potency per brain unit)
- Produces physical dependence with withdrawal CNS hyperexcitability
- Does not produce ethanol's locomotor stimulation
- Causes less endocrine disruption (LH) than equimolar ethanol
**Nutritional research era (1975):** Tobin et al. [Ref 24] published the first controlled human metabolic studies, establishing 1,3-BD as a nontoxic caloric substrate that decreased blood glucose and spared nitrogen. This opened investigations into its use as a food ingredient and energy source.
**Veech/ketone ester era (~2000s–present):** Richard Veech at NIH pursued ketone body esters as therapeutic agents; 1,3-butanediol was incorporated as the diol backbone in ketone esters (e.g., (R)-3-hydroxybutyl (R)-3-hydroxybutyrate) due to its ability to generate BHB after hydrolysis. The DARPA-funded work on soldier endurance contributed to the modern exogenous ketone supplement market [Ref 22].
**Commercial recreational use (~2019–present):** 1,3-Butanediol began appearing in commercially marketed "alcohol alternatives" from approximately 2019, with products like KetoneAid Hard Ketones. Media coverage and recreational community interest expanded significantly post-2020. As of 2026, multiple companies market R-1,3-butanediol beverages as social intoxicants with claimed reduced hangover risk.
---
## Subjective Effects
**Published controlled data (human):**
Shaw et al. (2019 [Ref 14]) — cycling study at 0.35 g/kg racemic 1,3-BD:
- Moderate to severe **gastrointestinal symptoms** in 5/9 participants
- **Dizziness, nausea, and euphoria** reported in 2/9 participants
- No measurable impact on performance or sedation
Tobin et al. (1975 [Ref 24]) — dietary supplementation in humans at higher doses:
- Decreased blood glucose (hypoglycemic effect)
- No major subjective CNS effects reported at metabolic doses
Lowder et al. (2023 [Ref 17]) — 34.5 g (R)-1,3-BD in fasting adults:
- **No impact on sleepiness** (Stanford Sleepiness Scale: no significant change)
- Generally well-tolerated; no/mild GI symptoms in most participants
- Mild **headaches** in 5/26 participants (two possibly related to study product)
**Historical reference (dose-escalation):** Per Ketone-IQ/historical source [Ref 19], beverages providing **0.5–0.7 g/kg** (35–49 g for 70 kg person) of racemic 1,3-BD produced **nausea, euphoria, and dizziness**; adverse effects were mitigated with divided dosing.
**Animal models (published):**
Frye et al. (1981 [Ref 11]) — equimolar IP dosing in rats vs. ethanol:
- Impaired aerial righting reflex (sedation/motor impairment)
- Attenuated punishment-suppressed drinking (anxiolytic-like)
- Lowered blood pressure (hypotension)
- Reduced cerebellar cGMP content
- Did NOT cause locomotor stimulation seen with ethanol in mice
**Community-sourced descriptions (PsychonautWiki [Ref 27]):**
- Alcohol-like intoxication with shorter duration than ethanol
- Disinhibition, relaxation, euphoria, dizziness
- Bitter-sweet taste noted as aversive by many users
- GI discomfort common
- Duration described as shorter than alcohol
**Effects taxonomy consistency check (vs. seed data):**
- *Disinhibition* — consistent with published CNS depressant profile [Ref 11, Ref 14]
- *Stimulation* — NOT documented in literature; Frye 1981 explicitly notes NO locomotor stimulation (unlike ethanol). This effect designation may be inaccurate for 1,3-BD.
- *Dizziness* — documented in human trials [Ref 14]
- *Dehydration sensation* — consistent with McCarthy et al. 2021 [Ref 1] showing dehydration at high doses in animals; hypoglycemia may contribute
- *Thought deceleration* — plausible as CNS depressant; no controlled data
- *Analysis suppression* — plausible; no controlled data
- *Anxiety suppression* — consistent with Frye 1981's anxiolytic-like effects (attenuation of punishment-suppressed drinking) [Ref 11]
---
## Safety & Toxicity
**LD50 data (animal):**
- Rat, oral: **18,610 mg/kg** (18.61 g/kg) [Ref 26]
- Mouse, oral: 12,980 mg/kg (12.98 g/kg) [web sources]
- Guinea pig, oral: 11,000 mg/kg (11.0 g/kg) [web sources]
- Rabbit, dermal: >20,000 mg/kg [Ref 26]
- Rabbit, oral: 18,610 mg/kg [Ref 26]
**Comparison:** Rat LD50 approximately 2.5× higher than ethanol (rat oral LD50 ~7.1 g/kg) [Ref 1], suggesting lower acute lethality potential per weight.
**Human safety data:**
- 15 g/day for 14 days: no significant adverse effects (historical clinical study, 1973; ref via [Ref 19])
- 40 g/day for 5 days: no significant adverse effects (historical clinical study, 1975; ref via [Ref 19])
- 12.5–25 g/day for 28 days (BH-BD ketone ester): no clinically meaningful changes in safety measures, no stimulation/sedation difference from placebo [Ref 2]
- 34.5 g/day (Avela, R-1,3-BD): well tolerated, mild GI symptoms in most, 5/26 mild headaches [Ref 17]
**FDA status:** Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) for use as a food flavoring molecule [Ref 19, Ref 27]
**Adverse effects documented in literature:**
- GI distress (nausea, abdominal cramping): most common, dose-related [Ref 14, Ref 17]
- Headache: 5/26 participants at 34.5g, 2 possibly drug-related [Ref 17]
- Euphoria, dizziness: at ≥0.35 g/kg doses [Ref 14]
- Hypoglycemia: documented in humans and animal models [Ref 24, Ref 1]; clinically relevant at high doses
- Dehydration: at very high doses in animals (10–20% in drinking water) [Ref 1]
- Metabolic acidosis: only at suprapharmacological doses in animals (20% drinking water, 4 weeks) [Ref 1]
- Sinusoidal dilation (liver histology): at 20% drinking water concentration in rats; no fatty liver or hepatotoxicity [Ref 1]
**Safety note on "limited safety data" (Ref 4):** Morris et al. (2026) specifically noted that 1,3-butanediol "is used in some formulations despite limited safety data" at a population level — flagging the gap between current commercial use volumes and available long-term human safety studies.
**⚠️ FLAG — Safety-critical:** No published acute overdose case reports specific to 1,3-butanediol (as opposed to 1,4-BD) were found. The emergency management literature does not appear to include 1,3-BD cases. No published LD50 in humans. No published studies on respiratory depression potential at high doses in humans.
**⚠️ FLAG — Hypoglycemia risk:** The well-documented hypoglycemic effect [Ref 24, Ref 1] poses a risk for diabetic individuals and those on blood glucose–lowering medications. No clinical contraindication guidance in published literature specific to 1,3-BD.
---
## Harm Reduction
**Published risk reduction strategies:**
- Divided dosing reduces GI adverse effects and peak psychoactive symptoms (0.5–0.7 g/kg doses were described as causing nausea/euphoria when consumed acutely; divided dosing mitigated this) [Ref 19]
- Consuming with food slows absorption and reduces GI distress [Ref 17]
- The Lowder et al. (2023 [Ref 17]) protocol (34.5 g over 3 servings across 60 min) was developed partly for tolerability
**Contraindications (inferred from published evidence; no published contraindication guidelines specific to 1,3-BD exist):**
- Diabetes mellitus or hypoglycemia susceptibility (documented blood glucose–lowering effect [Ref 24])
- Pregnancy (limited published data; one rat study [Ref 8] showed no adverse fetal effects at 20% drinking water, but human data are absent)
- Concurrent CNS depressant use — additive CNS and respiratory depression risk by class (no 1,3-BD–specific interaction studies found)
- Alcohol use disorder — complex: ketone supplements may reduce alcohol sensitivity [Ref 3] or reduce cravings [Ref 28], but competitive inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase by ethanol blocks 1,3-BD metabolism
**Identification:** No colorimetric test kits (e.g., reagent tests) for 1,3-BD are documented in published literature. Not detectable by standard drug screening panels (not a scheduled substance).
**Emergency note:** 1,3-BD produces CNS depression that may be confused with ethanol intoxication; it will NOT be detected by standard breathalyzer or most urine drug tests. No published antidote or reversal protocol specific to 1,3-BD overdose.
---
## Tolerance & Dependence
**Tolerance (animal data):**
Frye et al. (1981 [Ref 11]) demonstrated that chronic 1,3-BD administration in rats produced measurable tolerance, consistent with the physical dependence syndrome. No published human tolerance data.
**Physical dependence (animal data):**
- Majchrowicz et al. (1976 [Ref 12]): established that 1,3-BD suppresses ethanol withdrawal syndrome, demonstrating cross-tolerance with ethanol — indicating shared neuroadaptive mechanisms
- Frye et al. (1981 [Ref 11]): chronic administration and withdrawal of 1,3-BD caused CNS hyperexcitability characteristic of physical dependence in rats. This is the same hyperexcitability profile seen in sedative-hypnotic withdrawal syndromes (tremor, seizure susceptibility)
- **⚠️ FLAG — Safety critical:** 1,3-BD produces physical dependence and a withdrawal syndrome in rodent models. Human dependence liability has not been formally assessed in published clinical literature. Given the compound's similarity to ethanol at CNS level, dependence potential in chronic recreational human users is plausible but unquantified.
**Cross-tolerance:** Documented cross-tolerance with ethanol in both directions [Ref 11, Ref 12].
**Withdrawal:** In rats, 1,3-BD withdrawal after chronic administration produced hyperexcitability, analogous to sedative-hypnotic/ethanol withdrawal [Ref 11]. No published human withdrawal case reports.
---
## Interactions
**Ethanol (alcohol):**
- **Competitive substrate inhibition:** Both ethanol and 1,3-BD are substrates for alcohol dehydrogenase. Concurrent administration would be expected to competitively inhibit 1,3-BD's metabolism to BHB, potentially extending the half-life of the parent compound and altering its CNS/metabolic profile.
- **Cross-tolerance:** Frye 1981 [Ref 11] and Majchrowicz 1976 [Ref 12] established bidirectional cross-tolerance at CNS level
- **Paradoxical dampening:** Li et al. (2024 [Ref 3]) found that ketone supplementation *dampened* subjective and objective responses to alcohol in healthy volunteers — meaning co-ingestion may *reduce* alcohol's effects, contrary to simple additive CNS depression expectation
- **Brain metabolism shift:** Li et al. (2026 [Ref 28]) demonstrated that ketone supplementation shifts brain energy from glucose to ketones and reduces alcohol craving in AUD, suggesting a metabolic competition rather than CNS synergy
**CNS depressants (general):**
- As a CNS depressant with ethanol-like properties, additive effects with other depressants (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, opioids, GHB/GBL) should be expected at a class level
- **⚠️ FLAG — No published 1,3-BD–specific interaction studies with benzodiazepines, opioids, or other CNS depressants exist.** The interaction profile is inferred from class membership only.
**Blood glucose–lowering agents (insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas, SGLT-2 inhibitors):**
- 1,3-BD lowers blood glucose [Ref 24]; additive hypoglycemic risk with antidiabetics is plausible
- No published interaction studies
**Clinical trials investigating interactions:** NCT05551754 (alcohol response in healthy volunteers), NCT06559995 and NCT06815237 (ketone supplementation in AUD), NCT06807918 (ketones in AUD brain energetics) are all actively investigating the interaction between 1,3-BD/ketone supplements and alcohol — results pending.
---
## Legal Status
**United States:**
- NOT a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
- Not scheduled by DEA
- Holds FDA **GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe)** status as a food flavoring molecule
- Commercially available as food supplement / functional beverage ingredient [Ref 19]
**United Kingdom:**
- NOT listed in Schedules to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
- Not a controlled drug; no Home Office licence required
- Note: 1,4-butanediol (a different isomer) was added to UK controls; 1,3-BD was not
**European Union:**
- NOT scheduled; no EU-level controlled substance status identified
- Available as food ingredient in EU jurisdictions
**Canada:**
- NOT a scheduled substance under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA)
**Australia:**
- NOT listed in the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP/Poison Scheduling)
- Note: 1,4-butanediol was listed as border-controlled drug from March 2024; 1,3-BD was not affected
**Industrial note:** 40 CFR § 721.11417 references "(3R)-1,3-Butanediol" in a Significant New Use Rule context under EPA environmental regulations (not drug scheduling). No therapeutic or drug scheduling classification in US law.
---
## Clinical Trials
**Active/Recruiting as of April 2026:**
| NCT ID | Title | Phase | Status | Sponsor | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT06653725 | KETO-AHF: Exogenous Ketone Supplements in Patients Hospitalized for AHF | Phase 2 | Recruiting | Aarhus University Hospital | 1,3-BD vs placebo in acute heart failure/HFrEF [Ref 29] |
| NCT06559995 | Effects of Ketone Supplementation on Alcohol Withdrawal and Brain Metabolism in AUD | Phase 2 | Recruiting | University of Pennsylvania | Ketone (likely 1,3-BD-based) in AUD withdrawal |
| NCT06815237 | Effects of Ketone Supplement and Alcohol on Brain Metabolism | Phase 2 | Recruiting | University of Pennsylvania | Ketone-alcohol interaction |
| NCT06807918 | Effects of Ketones on Brain Energetics and Alcohol Consumption in AUD | Phase 2 | Not Yet Recruiting | University of Pennsylvania | Brain energy, AUD treatment |
| NCT05551754 | Acute Effects of Ketone Supplement on Responses to Alcohol Challenge in Healthy Volunteers | Phase 2 | Active, Not Recruiting | University of Pennsylvania | Alcohol sensitivity interaction |
| NCT06645847 | Targeting Aging With a Ketone Ester for Function in Frailty | N/A | Recruiting | Buck Institute for Research on Aging | KE (1,3-BD based) in frailty |
| NCT07224074 | Impact of Exogenous Ketones on Sleep and Breathing in Healthy Volunteers (K-SLEEP) | Phase 1 | Recruiting | Johns Hopkins University | Sleep/respiratory effects |
**Key completed/published trials relevant to 1,3-BD:**
- NCT04707989 (BH-BD safety, published as Chen et al. 2021 [Ref 2])
- Lowder et al. 2023 (Avela/R-1,3-BD clinical trial [Ref 17])
---
## Community Feedback Analysis
No community feedback was submitted in Part A2 of the brief. Per instructions, this section is therefore marked as follows:
**No community feedback submitted.**
---
## Gaps & Flags
### Critical Flags (Must Address Before Generation)
1. **⚠️ CRITICAL — Street name error:** Seed data lists "DMT, Dimethyltryptamine, Dmitri" as street names for 1,3-Butanediol. These belong to *N,N-dimethyltryptamine*, an entirely different substance. 1,3-Butanediol has no established street names in published literature; it is marketed commercially under brand names (Avela™, KetoneAid, Ketone-IQ). The generation agent should NOT use the seed data street names. This requires immediate database correction.
2. **⚠️ CRITICAL — Pharmacological class likely incorrect:** The seed data classifies 1,3-BD as "GHB receptor agonist." No published evidence supports this. GHB receptor agonism is documented for **1,4-butanediol** (which converts to GHB) — not 1,3-BD. This classification is likely a confusion between two different butanediol isomers. The generation agent should NOT perpetuate this classification without explicitly flagging it as unverified/disputed.
3. **⚠️ PHARMACOLOGY FLAG — GABA-A PAM unverified:** The "GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulator" classification is unverified for 1,3-BD itself. Frye 1983 [Ref 13] showed 1,3-BD is inactive at central GABA sites when applied directly. Effects are likely indirect (via BHB metabolite or systemic ethanol-like mechanisms). No Ki or EC50 data at GABA-A exist for 1,3-BD.
4. **⚠️ PHARMACOLOGY FLAG — NMDA antagonism unverified:** "NMDA receptor antagonist" classification has no published primary source support found in literature searches. Flag as unverified.
### Data Gaps
5. **No published human dose-response curve** for psychoactive effects. Published human data show:
- GI distress and some euphoria/dizziness at 0.35 g/kg (Shaw 2019 [Ref 14])
- No sleepiness at 34.5 g in split doses (Lowder 2023 [Ref 17])
- Nausea/euphoria/dizziness at 0.5–0.7 g/kg acutely (historical ref [Ref 19])
- No published threshold, light, common, strong, heavy dose ranges in controlled human studies
6. **No published duration data specific to subjective effects** in humans. The PK window (BHB elevation 1–5 hours) is established, but this does not directly map to subjective psychoactive duration.
7. **No human withdrawal or dependence case reports.** Animal dependence data exist [Ref 11, Ref 12], but human addiction liability is unknown. The compound is now in recreational use; clinical literature has not caught up.
8. **No published human overdose or toxicity case reports** specific to 1,3-BD (unlike 1,4-BD, which has extensive emergency medicine literature).
9. **CYP enzyme involvement unknown.** Published metabolic pathway uses alcohol dehydrogenase + aldehyde dehydrogenase, but formal CYP inhibition/induction studies have not been published for 1,3-BD.
10. **Sex differences in PK are documented** (Lowder 2023 [Ref 17]: females show greater Tmax and iAUC) but no sex-disaggregated dose guidance has been published.
11. **Pregnancy contraindication:** Only one animal study (periconceptional rat data [Ref 8] showing no fetal adverse effects); no human pregnancy data.
12. **Dose/duration proposals (per brief directive):** Based on the evidence hierarchy:
- *Published evidence:* GI/CNS effects at 0.35–0.7 g/kg in single acute dosing; 15–40 g/day documented safe in humans
- *Structural analog inference:* Effects comparable to but shorter-duration than ethanol (supported by Frye 1981 [Ref 11])
- *Community reports:* Shorter duration than alcohol (PsychonautWiki [Ref 27])
- Proposed dose ranges for editorial review: threshold ~0.1 g/kg (~7 g for 70 kg person); light ~0.2–0.3 g/kg; common ~0.35–0.5 g/kg (35 g); strong ~0.5–0.7 g/kg; heavy >0.7 g/kg — NOTE: these are editorial proposals based on limited evidence and should be clearly flagged as unconfirmed
- Proposed onset: 20–40 min oral (BHB elevation begins ~30–45 min; direct effects possibly faster)
- Proposed peak: 1–2 hours
- Proposed total duration: 2–4 hours (shorter than comparable ethanol doses based on Frye 1981 comparison and community reports)
13. **⚠️ "Characterization: emerging" partially accurate.** The compound has been studied since 1975–1981, so it is not newly discovered. However, its *recreational use* and *commercial marketing as alcohol alternative* is indeed recent (post-2019), which may justify the "emerging" characterization in the recreational context.
14. **Interactions with benzodiazepines, opioids, GHB/GBL:** No 1,3-BD-specific data. Inferred class-level additive CNS depression risk. The paradoxical ketone-dampening-of-alcohol effect [Ref 3, Ref 28] complicates simple additive interaction assumptions.